Emil von Maltitz - Professional Photography.

Going on a workshop

2012-01-20T10:09:00.000+02:00

I originally wrote about going on workshops in July 2010 for my Photo Writing. Since then I have run over 30 workshops that have been more than a day in duration as well as a number of smaller single day workshops and seen numerous students on a private basis. What I wrote in July 2010 still holds, if not being even more relevant today.

10 years ago most middle income families didn’t own an SLR. Certainly there were video cameras and point and shoot cameras in their masses. However, SLR cameras tended to be the realm of the enthusiast. Then came the boom in digital photography and there was an attendant explosion in the numbers of digital SLRs that hit the market...and were gobbled up as if the camera buying public were an insatiable beast. A number of commentators are now saying that DSLRs have reached their saturation point. If you look at the prospected financials of the likes of Nikon this would suggest that this is true.

Part of the allure of digital photography is the immediacy of the image capture process: Point, shoot and see. No more the waiting for weeks to not only finish the film but then to have it processed at a lab before being able to see the final results. There are a number of consequences of this boom in amateur photography, one of which is the proliferation of workshops that are now available.

With all the choices out there, what does the budding workshop goer look for in a workshop. Here’s a basic list that might come in handy when choosing a workshop to go to:

· Is it a workshop or a photo tour? This is critical in knowing what to expect from a workshop. There are plenty of outfits that claim to be running workshops, but in fact are leading a photographic tour. The difference is immense. A workshop involves a very large learning aspect, usually under the guidance of a professional photographer or instructor. Some workshops have a strong classroom based element while others take place predominantly in the field. Either way, are you being taken to a location to take photos, or are you also receiving instruction at the same time.

· Are you going somewhere? What better than to go to an exotic location and learn how to take photographs at the same time? Be aware though that sometimes workshops based in a single location are more valuable from a learning point of view than workshops that require travel (it’s pretty difficult to teach while jolting around in the back of a Landrover for 5 hours a day). That said, travel workshops have a unique feeling to them as a workshop group become friends and fellow travellers at the same time.

· Who is your instructor? This links in directly to the first point. A lot of photographic tours are led by prominent professional photographers. This doesn’t mean though that the photographer, as amazing as they may be, is any good as a teacher. You pay a premium to join a workshop or a photographic tour. Decide whether simply joining a photographer on a tour so that they can pay for their shoot is worthwhile or whether you actually want to get valuable one on one interaction with the photographer, which leads us to:

· How many other photographers will there be? This is critical for someone wanting to obtain valuable learning from an instructor. A good instructor can really only handle 6-10 students while maintaining a high level of interaction. More than this and personal attention starts to fade. I personally do not take more than 10 students unless I absolutely have to (special request for instance). Ideally I would take less but sadly economy of numbers does rear its ugly head and it’s the actual students who benefit by making the course less expensive for all.

· So how good is the instructor anyway? A recent article I read recommended that the workshop goer only uses a well-known photographer/instructor. I certainly agree with trying to avoid fly-by-nighters, but well-known is relative. A photographer may be well known in one country but completely unheard of in another. A good gauge is to look at how long the instructor has been teaching workshops for and also what their website looks like. Is the website full of awe-inspiring images, or is there also a good deal of instructional material? My preference would be to go with the photographer who also disseminates information through their websites. The former may just be another top-photographer struggling through the recession by piggybacking his/her shoots on a workshop, and for that matter:

· Does the instructor take their own photographs? I’ve come across some internet chatter on this before. Some feel that the instructor should not even have a camera as it is the students that come first, while others feel that the instructor is a photographer and should be allowed to practice the art. My feeling is somewhere between the two. Photography to me is like breathing. So this is an admission that I do take photographs on workshops. However, the students’ images and their learning experience do come first. Quite frankly, if the instructor never picks up a camera they are going to get awfully bored. In my experience, when the light is right, the students disappear in every which direction to capitalise on it. I’ve tried the no-camera approach and not only found myself bothering the students (after-all, it’s only the rare student who needs to have their hand held the whole way), but was actually chastised by some of them as they wanted to see how I worked, resulting in my adjusting the workshop so that my images became teaching tools.

· Is there feedback? Feedback sessions are possibly the most important aspect of the workshop and surprisingly are often overlooked by some operators. Here is the opportunity for students to learn from their mistakes. In all the workshops I run, critique sessions are built in so that students are able to learn from mistakes and apply what they have learnt the next day.

· Who is the workshop for? This is actually quite important. Not all workshops are equal. Some workshops cover a very specific area of expertise (Macro-lighting, Landscape Composition) while others are broad in their scope. Check to see who the workshop is intended for. Advanced photographers may be disappointed going on a workshop intended to teach the basics while beginner photographers may be completely overwhelmed in a workshop geared toward intermediate and advanced photographers.

At the end of the day one of the greatest advantages of going on a workshop is the artistic stimulation that you will receive. Whether there is a competitive air among the students or not (and sometimes there is a slight undercurrent) the ideas that bounce back and forth through discussion and viewing each other’s work is incredibly stimulating. I have seen some students do a complete u-turn in their thinking purely from seeing other people’s work. There is also more energy put into finding and creating the images. It’s as if the artistic part of the brain decides, “Now I am going to work”. For me though, the simple fact that you are surrounding yourself with other photographers, talking, thinking and doing photography can only improve your skills and photographic mindset. For that reason, the instructor, if they are passionate about their work (the kind you want as an instructor), will get as much out of the workshop as the students will.

Thanda Photography workshop - A start to 2012

2012-01-13T15:45:00.002+02:00

Thanda time once more. Make that insect season actually. January's moist-oven heat, means that the insect world comes alive...that and every heat loving animal as well (read snakes). For some of the students this wasn't exactly fantastic as a drive through the bush meant tearing through innumerable Bark Spider and Garden Orb-Web Spider webs that were strewn across every open patch of bushveld available. But it made for some great shots of terrifyingly large spiders that look like Shelob from the Lord of the Rings.

On a sobering note, the current poaching crisis is affecting all of the reserves in the Zululand region. Every reserve is on high alert with Thanda as well as its neighbours now posting 24 hour patrols to protect the rhino population. Rhino deaths increased last year from 323 last year to 448 in 2011, with Kwazulu-Natal Province being the hardest hit (you can visit Stop Rhino Poaching for more information or to make a donation to save the rhino). Already, there have been 19 confirmed rhino death's in 2012, and we're only 13days in. This is shocking news for a species that might not live to see the next century, and is an appalling indictment on humankind's avarice. Thanda has also lost one of their male lions, 'Spot', to poaching since the last workshop. So it was with some sadness that I watched the now depleted South Pride on my first day back on the reserve.

On photographic matters: a number of the students struggled with low light photography this last week. Although I know that I harp on about ultimate image quality regularly, it must be said that there is a time and place for upping the ISO. Modern DSLRs are extraordinarily good at shooting in low light. The above image of a lioness and the lower image of two buffalo sparring were both taken at high ISO (1600 on a D700). Yes, the image quality is compromised, but not so much that the images cannot be blown up to as large as A3. Good post-production technique will mean that either of these images could be used as a double truck (double page spread) in a magazine. In landscape photography there is reason to shoot at the base ISO so that better detail can be retained in the shadows. For wildlife and sport photography, although the image would benefit from low ISO shooting, the reality is that getting the image is better than not getting the image at all. So be brave and crank up that ISO. Just remember that it's not the highest ISO possible that you use, but the lowest permissible ISO that you use (i.e. in the example's here the lowest permissible ISO to obtain a shutter speed that would negate camera shake and unintentional blur was 1600 ISO).

Thanks to the students at Thanda for yet another wonderful week in the bush.

Enter 2012 and Previsualisation in Life

2012-01-05T09:51:00.001+02:00

The end of 2011 turned into quite a busy month, hence the dearth of blog posts over the festive season. 2012 has also started off at a sprint, along with some of the complications of a New Year. Admin first then. If you are reading this and have subscribed to the Photo Writing Newsletter, but have not received your edition this month, please check your spam settings (particularly for Hotmail users) and white-list the Limephoto email address.

I'll also be posting the editorial of the Photo Writing on the blog hence forth...although for the news sections and technique piece a subscription to Photo Writing is still necessary (pdf file emailed at the beginning of each month).

Okay, admin over. Read on for the editorial from the January 2012 Photo Writing.

Previsualisation in Life

Being the father of two daughters means that I get to read a lot of storybooks with inspirational life-lesson messages that we hope our children will cling to someday. The irony of course is that the messages are maybe more relevant to the adult reader than the child listener. So with that in mind I have the moral of two stories that might make for a decent New Year’s message and motivation to draw up those resolutions once more. Yes, they are applicable to photographers.

The first is of the small train, Thomas, from ‘Thomas the Tank Engine’ as he chants to himself, “I think I can, I think I can” while climbing a steep hill with a long and heavy load of carriages ahead of him as he assists Gordon, a large steam train that has given up. The second is a small picture book entitled, “Believe It, Because It Can Be”. Both stories rotate around something I’ve waxed lyrical on before…previsualisation.

The concept of previsualistion comes firmly from traditional ideas of art, whereas post-visualists are more concerned with the unique opportunities presented by the photographic medium in capturing slices of unmediated time on film (or sensor). At any rate, previsualisation requires seeing the image in the mind’s eye before the shutter is tripped, so that the previsualised image can guide the creation of the actual image. It is one of the hardest things for fine art photographers to learn.

Previsualisation stretches beyond picture-taking though. Enter Thomas the Tank Engine struggling up the hill. You need to see your success so that it can be achieved. No this isn’t a zen kind piece, it’s a realization that photographers need to set themselves goals that they can see in their mind’s eye. You want to be that great photographer one day? Then see it, believe it, and work towards it with every scrap of skill and talent that you may possess. Too many would be photographers are put off at the first hurdle. Often that hurdle is only a small one, like not getting the gig you wanted. So what? Try again. There are plenty of jobs out there and a lot of photographers vying for them. If you don’t get this one and give up, then how are you going to get the next one. Be motivated to learn from people as to why you didn’t get the job. It’ll help the next time round.

Having a vision of where you want to be is a little like running a race. Without knowing more or less where the finishing line is, a runner can’t exactly compete against other runners. Admittedly the world of professional photography is a little less linear than a straight 400m sprint race. It has a couple twists, some odd multiple options and a crazy ‘run three races at a time’ mentality. In a recent series of articles that David Noton has written about going pro he finds that there is no single way to succeed in the photographic profession. I disagree. One of the over-riding similarities between photographers that have made it in the photographic world is the commonality of wanting to make it. There is a hunger that those who drop out simply don’t have. I suspect that without visualizing your ‘place’ that you want to be in, it is very hard to develop that ‘hunger’ to succeed.

The idea of pre-visualisation in life doesn’t only extend to aspiring professional photographers though. Enthusiasts make up the greatest number in the photographic population. Again, if there is a commonality amongst this throng it is the desire to be better. So set a goal. Visualise the end. Perhaps it’s an exhibition. Maybe it’s to be a finalist in a major international photographic salon. Possibly it’s to sell an art print, or better yet, produce a book. Regardless of the end result, previsualisng that end is an important part of being able to reach that end. That’s what New Year’s resolutions are all about. The problem is that most New Year’s resolutions are vaguely structured. It’s just a hint of an idea of what to do. To get it right you need to feel, taste the end. Know that you can do it, and then follow that knowledge and use it as your ambition or your drive. So as we enter another year, don’t make resolutions that are mere wisps of a desire. Create a dream and follow it rigorously. Then the dream will become reality. Good luck and happy shooting for 2012!

Updated Drakensberg Gallery

2011-12-07T09:39:00.001+02:00

One of the things I seem appallingly bad at is updating the actual website. An early New Year's resolution is to finally catch up with this. The results so far can be viewed on the Drakensberg and Standard Bank Project galleries on the Limephoto Website. Hope you enjoy the images.

COP17 - Making Events Interesting

2011-12-06T12:41:00.001+02:00

Okay, so I am fortuitously placed to be a part of the United Nations Congress of Parties, Durban 2011 climate talks. By fortuitously placed I mean that I live in Durban and people are desperate for photographers. So this means I spent the weekend shooting one of the side events to the full on COP17 negotiations. No I didn't make it in as a photographer to the main sessions, but in a way I'm relieved. Instead I ended up being the official photog to the Standard Bank hosted IETA conference.

The thing about event photography is that most of the time you are shooting business suit clad men and women looking dour-faced at times, disinterested at others. The goal is to make the proceedings look lively, interesting and above all, good. Not an easy thing to do when the height of lighting sophistication from some venues is a panel of halogen down-lights. Of course I speak from the highly biased point of view of an events photographer, NOT A JOURNALIST!! The journalist's job is convey THEIR version, or interpretation of the truth as they see it. An event's photographer is a hired gun in much the same way as an advertorial photographer is. You are paid to cover the event for publicity purposes, and if that happens to be propaganda for the client, so be it (we can have an ethical debate on this at another point...the basic premise being that if you have issues with the organizing party, then don't shoot for them...duh). If you agree with the party, then by all means accept the gig and enjoy the talks.

To the task at hand and the horrible down-lighting. For the most part I find shooting available light is often the best way to get interesting shots, particularly when you are using a long telephoto lens. The problem comes with trying to get more than just the usual shadows and here the advantages of being the event photographer start to play a hand...or in this case two light stands, one umbrella and three flashes play a hand. In other words, because I have relative carte blanche I am able to set up auxiliary lighting, so long as it doesn't interfere with the proceedings themselves.

For the first day I used solely available light. So the images of Minister Manuel and the big shot meeting were all done on high ISO on my D700. Thing is, this was on purpose. As an event photographer you don't necessarily want to interrupt certain meetings with flash bursts going off continuously (a caveat to this follows in a moment), particularly on the first day of the shoot if there are multiple days.

The first two images show no flash at all, only pure ambient light shots on high ISO (1600 or 3200 on the D700, 640 on the D3x). The second day's shots were then augmented with flash light. Again the advantage of being the official event photog is that people get used to seeing you around. On day one where a stray flash burst will irritate the speakers, day 2 and beyond they become almost nonchalant towards the flash (although always chat to the session's chairperson before banging away with flash). I've also noticed that not being journalist actually gets participants to open up towards me as the photog. They seem almost less reticent to be photographed. Incidentally the third image shows one of the shots with a bare strobe coming from the opposit side of the room so that I could get some interesting short lighting effects on the speakers.

The basic setup for the large room was to have a strobe placed high and in the center of the room facing towards the speakers and softened by shooting through a shoot-through brolly. This flooded the room with soft light and could be used on it's own if desired. Then on opposite sides of the room I had two more straight strobes (i.e. no modifiers) pointed towards the speakers but slightly feathered inwards. Using the Phottix Stratos II and setting the three strobes into their own group each, I was able to choose one, two or all three flashes at any given time. A little bit of trial and error just prior to the session helped me calculate the flash outputs and the basic settings that I would be using.

You can see how the opposing flash was used in the above shot. This meant that I could easily create either a rim light or short lighting depending on my position vis-a-vis the flash and the speaker. Definitely more interesting than the standard bog ordinary shot of a talking head.

Another great way of creating interesting shots is to do panoramic sweep of the room. Thanks to Adobe's photomerge, which has gotten increasingly better with each of the Photoshop iterations, panoramics are really easy. No you don't need a special head. The shot here was done with a 16mm lens on the vertical axis in a relatively small boardroom. It's not fine art, but it works for the task in hand.

Lastly there is the ubiquitous group shot. Shudder. Another setup of a line of individuals facing the camera. Sometimes this is admittedly necessary, but other times people want to have something that's a little different. Do the standard shot, then get people to do something different. You don't necessarily have to get corporate jumping on the spot as if they are at a wedding lampooning for the photographer, but certainly get them to do something different. In this case I popped a single strobe behind a shoot-through brolly on the ground, lay down on my back and shot the group as if they were upside down (at least that's what it'll look like in the viewfinder). Instant smile as the photographer, who everyone now knows because you have been hanging around for a while, looks like an idiot on the floor (or num-nuts as Joe McNally calls himself).

Like I said, it doesn't have to be high art, but if it's different, and if it's good, you will get a call back for future work!

Going Grey

2011-11-24T15:42:00.001+02:00

An interesting aspect of fine art photography, or at least the acceptance of photography as fine art by the general public (in South Africa at the very least but I've heard this from photographers in the UK and Australia well) is that it must be in black and white rather than colour. Scott Kelby rather cynically comments that to be accepted as a great photographer you must produce some black and white images. Although I think this is rubbish, I also think that Kelby is absolutely right. The acceptance of colour photography as a fine art medium is still to occur in much of the photography buying world. David Ward says much the same thing in his book, 'The Inner Landscape' when he muses that serious colour landscape photography is still to be explored - an interesting comment considering the exceptional work by the likes of Charlie Waite and Joe Cornish who are also personal friends of Ward's (or so we are led to assume), not to mention Ward's own work.

Ground breaking work was done for the United States by Alfred Stieglitz and the rest of the 'Photo Secessionists' and later 'Group F64' in elevating photography to the ranks of Fine Art. If one looks at the number of Fine Art photographers around the world, the predominant number of them that make their entire living from prints and fine art media are situated in North America. This may be an unqualified statement, but it thanks to early masters in the States that photographs have been recognised as objets d'arts. Here in South Africa, and I would argue much of the rest of the Western world, photographs are seen -by the public- as something that can be created by anyone, that skill and artistry are not necessary requirements. "That's a great photograph, you must have a fantastic camera", is a common enough double-edged 'compliment'.

Still, it is in black and white photographs people seem to see 'real' art. Which is a shame, as the world is beautiful in colour as well. In South Africa at least I have been to exhibitions by significant photographers where it is only the black and white images that garner the attention of the public. David Goldblat is a good example. He worked in both colour and black and white, but his exhibitions and books seem to hold mostly his black and white images. Obie Oberholzer is one of the few fine art photographers in South Africa who seems to be recognised as a 'colour' photographer, and it mainly has to do with the way that his colours are so strikingly vivid. He works with colour as a black and white master would work with tone. Yet, the last exhibition of his that I saw was shortly before leaving Grahamstown (he was also off to new pastures) and his beautiful prints were going for...well a song compared to even mediocre photographers in the States (just take a look at the prices of prints on the plethora of photographer's websites to get an idea).

Not that I want to decry black and white photography. Heinrich van den Berg's stunning images in his 'Shades of Nature' are oftentimes breathtaking. the rich detail and tones become all the more obvious for their presentation in monochrome. Standing in front of an original Ansel Adams is almost indescribable as you look at the richness in texture and tone that he was capable of married to compositions that weld your eyes to the frame.

But colour should have a place too. I love black and white, but struggle to see in it. These few images are examples where I have consciously tried to think in black and white. I'm not convinced I was successful. the irony is that given the chance I would bet that some commentators would say these are better than the colour work that I strive towards. Juries out I guess.

Thanda Paused

2011-11-18T11:40:00.001+02:00

November...and the world (or at least much of the Western world) starts to grind to a yule-tide induced lethargy. Businesses wind down - some earlier than others - and retail outlets gear up as the festive season is hailed in with the ring of the till-register. Cynicism aside it is a time to reflect on the year past. admittedly I might be doing this a touch early as I have just returned to the studio after another excellent week at Thanda Game Reserve with the African Impact Photography Volunteers/Students. This is also the last workshop of the year, hence the time to reflect.

Something that we should all reflect on as the new year approaches with a plethora of new toys emerging from the East (and Germany of course ;-) ): Do we really need a gazillion megapixels and the world's most advanced focusing engines in our cameras? Let's face it, if we are not getting the results we want from the camera, it's probably not the camera to blame. But I preach in vain I suspect (my itchy palms when the latest and greatest is presented to me is ample evidence of this). So it was refreshing this week to have one of my students work with her two cameras, a Canon 50D and an older 20D interchangeably. Looking at the images, which were good mind you, you could not tell which camera was used (and she shot equally with both). So what do we want from a camera? Be honest and you might find that rather than putting a mortgage up to buy the next best thing from Nikon, Canon or Sony the money might be better spent going somewhere to use your existing equipment. As an exercise price the lust items that you scan the ads for. then look and see what it would cost to go to that place you've been wanting to see for the past decade (Madagascar or the Galapagos perhaps). Telling isn't it (when you start talking pro gear you could probably afford to bring the family too)!

I am guilty myself though, having recently tucked into my savings and credit card to obtain a backup body (a used D700). I could have had a safari in Botswana for what I paid - and I think of this fact often. To me, the relief now when I go on a shoot that I have a fall-back is worth that though. Note, that the purchase was second hand and unlike the multitude that are waiting for Nikon's soon-we-hope-we-pray-to-be-released-D800 I bought something that is at the end of it's product cycle. It's a great camera and will continue to be so for years to come...I still wish I could go to Botswana though ;-).

So back to reflecting: the last year at Thanda has taken a photography project that was good in St Lucia to something fantastic at the reserve. We've had dozens of photographers join the project over the year, more than any year to date. We've even had returnees within the same year (hats off to Martijn and Cyndi who are currently staff). I have met incredible talent that is simply waiting for that moment to burst out and shine. Each month I'm in awe at some of the images that the students produce. Original, bold, technical and beautiful, professionals could take a leaf out of the many and varied books that these photographers create. They love photography. Wait, they LOVE photography. It is so easy to get caught up in billing, clients, pushing your name and images out there, that we can forget what brought us into this incredible pastime and vocation.

We've watched some amazing things happen on the reserve as well. Although I haven't been there for all of it, the students and volunteers have had incredible interactions with elephant, lion, rhino, cheetah, leopard, hyena and various other large mammals. The lion prides on Thanda (North and South) have kept the researchers scratching their heads at some of the strange behavior that they have recorded. Lions and wild dog have left the reserve and then subsequently returned. A caracal made the camp home for a day or two, geckos pooed untold tons of...stuff...onto pillow cases, and we all learned how to live without water (although I thankfully get to go home after a week).

It's been a wonderful year at Thanda. Although the year is yet to extinguish the candle (and work must continue), it's time for a pause at Thanda, at least for me. Next year, 9th of January the first workshop starts. If anybody out there is interested in joining, drop me a line. Thanks to yet another wonderful group that made me forget that what I do is actually work... (hehe).

Frisbee Fun

2011-11-11T07:45:00.001+02:00

Last month my sister-in-law came up to Durban to take part in an ultimate frisbee competition along with a team from Cape Town called the 'Chillies'. She works for a non-profit organisation called 'Life X Change' , youth development program that takes adolescents off the street and tries to empower them so that they are able to change their lives for the better. Many of these young guys have been in detention, are addicted to some sort of substance, have been in gangs or any number of foul ups that can put someone into a spiral from which they can't climb out. The point of this is that the Chillies allowed two of these 'life exchangers' as well as my sister-in-law into the team for the National Competition which was held this year in sunny (or not as the case may be) Durban.

Which gave me a chance to practice my sports photography, and wow was I rusty. the last time I shot sports was for the build-up to the Beijing Olympics where I was assigned by Getty to cover the development aspect of the buildup by a large international mining company. The development aspect happened to be the development of soccer in the rural and township clubs. So I found myself photographing a lot of football for a while. As with any skill though, if you don't practice, you get rusty.

Enthusiasts who have never shot sport tend to think that modern cameras do all the work for the photographer. not so. Autofocus actually only has limited usefulness. Auto-exposure similarly can get things wrong a lot of the time, meaning that sports pros are often in manual mode and manual focus. Yes, AF is incredible nowadays, but it can actually be harder to autofocus than to manually follow-focus on a running player.

First off, metering: In the old days of film sports pros would spot meter off the one constant in the game - the grass. Setting the camera to manual they could then pretty much shoot as they liked and just keep an eye on the changing light-levels, adjusting occasionally to suit. If you ever go and watch a big sports game you'll notice that the old-hands sit in one place. They DON'T go charging up and down the field to follow the action. That's why they are able to happily meter off the grass and stick it in manual. In some ways things haven't changed. Now though we have the welcome addition of a histogram to check the exposure. A quick look at the histogram and we can be certain that the exposure is right when we are pointing in a certain direction down the field (it's harder to do this when we are on the sideline and in the middle of the field as we'll be swinging the lens in two different directions). So the gist of it is that manual metering is the most consistent, although aperture priority is the next fallback mode. Again, a beginner might think 'why not shutter priority?'. The problem with shutter priority is that if the light level changes and you are already at your maximum aperture (the widest aperture) the camera will still fire, but underexpose. In aperture priority at the maximum aperture the shutter speed just drops a stop when the light goes. This means the exposure is still good, but there may be a touch of blur on the movement, which isn't always a bad thing.

Then there's focus. Here the best advice is the same thing that you do on the field in most team sports - 'mark your man'. Trying to follow the ball is nigh on impossible (sometimes it works, but only sometimes). Whether you choose to manual focus or autofocus, keeping the lens trained on one player is the best way to achieve accurate focus. The ball, or frisbee in this case, moves faster than we can keep up with, but not the players. It doesn't matter how fast a player runs, they are slower than the ball or frisbee and consequently a whole lot easier to follow. With practice it becomes possible to accurately manual focus, as was the case with all the images presented here (it's not that I don't have an autofocus camera, but that my lenses were either manual focus, the 400mm f3.5, or were rather slow in AF performance, the 80-200mm f2.8 EDIF).

Once you have the knack of following an individual, then it's just a matter of practice getting the ball, puck, shuttle-cock or whatever other object that is being played with in the frame as well. This is the final 'rule' of good sports images. There are very few great shots that don't have the 'ball' in the frame. Without it, it's just a bunch of people frozen in time. Yes, some images are memorable without it, but that's due to another factor such as they players taking a swing at each other, or some other out of the ordinary moment.

Sport's photography, doesn't necessarily require a vast equipment outlay (an APS-C sensor camera - think Canon EOS 550D or Nikon D90 - with a 70-300mm lens is perfectly adequate for decent sports shots). Yes, a D3s or the new Canon 1Dx with a 400mm f2.8 would be lovely, but the reality is that few soccer moms or dads can afford an almost luxury vehicle worth of camera gear. Bumping the ISO up a tad and getting the composition and focus right and your shots can be as good as the double truck images in Sport's Illustrated. It's just a matter of practice (of which I clearly need some more of ;-) ).

Tripping the light fantastic - a completely unprofessional review of the Phottix Stratos II

2011-11-08T21:11:00.000+02:00

Review sites abound. I'm sure that a couple of google taps away and you can find an exhaustive review of the Phottix Stratos radio triggers. Not only that, but there are likely some detailed reviews that will point out the merits (or lack thereof) of these triggers vis-a-vis Pocket Wizards and the various other triggers on the market (I even read some of them ;-) ). Some techie out there has probably even gone so far as to measure the exact frequency that these triggers use. That doesn't matter a jot to me I'm afraid. What I cared about was whether these small and relatively cheap triggers would fit into my workflow without causing too many headaches.

The short answer is that I cannot believe I ever managed to work without them. They really are fantastic. So now for the long answer. A radio trigger is essentially a device that triggers your flashes wirelessly using radio waves. They've been around for a while with most of the lighting manufacturers now producing their own variants, such as Elichrom's 'Skyport' triggers. Currently the de facto king of the hill when it comes to flash triggering via radio receivers are the trusted, hardy, and extremely expensive Pocket Wizards (or PWs for short). A plethora of cheap Chinese manufactured variants have flooded the market in the costly wake of the American PW. Some are nasty, others are reasonable and a few are really good.

Read the Full Review

The Special Group - November Drakensberg Workshop and a comment on Dynamic Range

2011-11-07T06:52:00.001+02:00

I live a charmed life to be able to meet and work with the photography students that I have the privilege to meet on a monthly basis. This month’s Drakensberg workshop cemented this once more as we travelled through to Royal Natal with the largest group to date. Of course, group dynamics have a large part to play and the November group of photographers (the very same individuals as the Thanda group that I worked with two weeks ago) have hit it off from the word go. A disparate group is certainly a good description, geographically, personality wise and occupationally, but they have seemed to get on as if they have all known each other since kindergarten. I love groups like that. It turns my work into play…to the point that I start to feel guilty that I’m actually being paid to do what I do…although that happens a lot to be honest.

Talking photography: sitting atop the Witches viewpoint makes you realize the importance of your camera’s histogram. Modern digital cameras are exceptionally good at resolving detail right from the darkest shadows through the brightest highlights. DXO Mark reports that a number of the top, and even a good number of the entry-level cameras available today, are able to resolve tonal detail in up to ten stops of light. I have a habit, a bad one I realize, of falling back on the safe number of seven stops of dynamic range in a digitial SLR as was the case with DSLRs some three generations back (think the Nikon D200, Canon 20D, maybe even the 30D). These cameras were excellent, but pulling details from the shadows still brought out the worst in the sensor. It still does, it just happens that the worst happens to be exceptionally good.

Getting shots like the image of the photographers on the Witches (above) then revolves around trusting the histogram. Forget about the image in the LCD screen. Chimping only makes sense if you are doing it effectively, and doing it effectively means using the full RGB histogram. In the case of this image the histogram was spread right across the range from the very darkest shadow, where is wasn’t clipping, through to the brightest highlight, where it very definitely was clipping (the sun will pretty much always clip, and if it doesn’t it means you have an extremely underexposed shot that is rendering everything except the sun in pitch black). Yes, a tonal blend would be a great way to get maximum dynamic range right from the very darkest shadows through the highlights around the sun. Sometimes we don’t have time to do this though. Sometimes a quick single frame is all that we can, or want, to do. Trust the histogram. Processing the image in Capture NX2 (Photoshop would have been as easy), I brightened the darks and shadows portion of the image while masking off the bright sky. The same thing was then done in reverse by darkening the sky portion and masking off the now not so shadowy foreground. There are still the same number of stops of light that have been recorded by the camera, but the image has a greater perceived dynamic range. The miraculous thing is that when zooming in to 100% in the shadows, there is little to no noise (and what small noise there is can easily be cleaned up). The trick here is to shoot at the base ISO of the camera. Anything higher and the noise in the shadows in amplified in the analogue to digital conversion within the camera. Neat that cameras have gotten so good! We just need to learn how to effectively use them.

Another wonderful weekend in the Berg. Sitting at Witsieshoek after 3 days where the weather gods smiled and gave us perfection, a sense of supreme satisfaction creeps in. Now it’s back to the studio, clients, processing, keywording (aaargh) and marketing. There are downsides to being a freelance photographer and instructor, but the good outweighs the bad a hundred to one!

Portraiture Assignment – using available light

2011-10-27T08:18:00.000+02:00

I recently had the pleasure to photograph the lead oboist of the KZN Philharmonic Orchestra in short portrait shoot at the Playhouse Company building in Durban’s CBD. As usual I came prepared with absolutely everything…6 small hotshoe strobes, brollies, softboxes stands and an army of lenses…all crammed into a duffel and two camera backpacks. I like to be prepared I guess. So I sweated my way into the foyer and soon met up with Alison Lowell, the oboist (you can see her site on www.alisonlowell.com). We wound our way through the labyrinthine backstage area to the theatre for the first shot…where we were promptly chased off from.

The first shots were fairly simple headshots against against one of the black velvet backdrop curtains behind stage. A white umbrella used as a reflector for the main and a zoomed flash-head for the hair light (Alison has lovely red hair which I wanted to emphasize in the colour images). I also put a reflector up on her lap to fill any hard shadows and soften the face somewhat.

Then we got a little more interesting. The Playhouse building has these incredible ornate doors facing onto the side street. Light was pouring through these, despite the fact that the side-street angled away from the sun itself (essentially the light was being reflected from the concrete façade of the building next door. I wanted to selectively light Alison with the framework of the doors behind her. To do this I underexposed the doors so that we got black frames with light. I then placed a flash in a white umbrella reflected back to her on camera left. This gave nice defined lighting on her right hand side, but cast a strong shadow on her left. This was moody but a bit too dark, so a kicker in the form of a strobe from camera right with a rogue flash-bender formed into a snoot filled her face nicely.

As I mention above, I came fully prepared with a mountain of gear (wish I'd had an assistant to lug the stuff about), but my favourite images came, not from the shots that used flash, but from the natural light images that we finished up with.

We had various other setups using stairs, chairs and other backgrounds. the location that was brimming with promise in the end was a sort of conservancy like space above the main foyer. Window light flooded this large area. the light itself was then bounced around thanks to a wall of mirrors on either end and light toned walls opposite the actual window. The light coming in through the large windows was beautiful. I couldn't pay for better light!

So the final few images were shots completely sans flash. The first image was a simple one using the window light with Alison up close to the window itself. This is a pretty cliched technique...because it works so well. Thanks to the inverse square rule the light falls off incredibly quickly, meaning that if the face is properly exposed, the back of the head is already about two to three stops darker. Move away from the window and the effect is less obvious, as seen in the final image below.

The images were done for next years KZN Philharmonic Orchestra brochure. Alison, an American by birth, will be performing with them for the foreseeable future. Her site can be visited by clicking on the link (http://www.alisonlowell.com).

Let's talk about...

2011-10-24T15:57:00.000+02:00

Well that's what the wildlife seemed to be talking about this last week. The final drive of the week was one of the most interesting I have been on in a long time. We had the opportunity to watch two Spotted Hyenas mating as well as a lion and lioness doing the same (while the lion's brother looked on). Still, not all wildlife photography is of such a nature...and sometimes simple portraits will suffice.

The last week was the biggest group to date with 10 photographers joining the workshop. The pace was frenetic for all, but I managed to collapse only one student with a migraine (sorry Kerry). 10 photographers draws a lot of intensity when it comes to group sessions, and this months group were fantastic. There was a great repartee that seemed to develop between the group as we went out on shoots and bandied over crit sessions. Yes, the weather gremlin was still in force. I swear that African Impact are going to ban me soon as I always without fail seem to bring the grey skies. As I write this the sun is shining, but last week it was anything but.

Overall a wonderful with a really a great group of photogs. I'm looking forward to seeing what comes out of this month.

For anyone wanting to book for the next workshop which takes place between the 14th and the 19th of November, please get hold of me asap. Numbers are starting to come in and we are wanting to keep it to a maximum of 6 for November.

Breathing in the Berg

2011-10-18T18:04:00.000+02:00

At the end of last week I had a rather dim moment. I left my laptop on the Thanda bus, so waved goodbye to the wonderful guests that I had in the berg over the weekend...and my laptop and the last blog post that I was supposed to put up. So imagine this is actually being read last Monday :-)

This morning I wandered out to the ridge overlooking the Mahai Valley to gaze at my beguiling mistress. The distant whisper of Mahai Falls drifted over the stubby grass. It is sometimes good to put the camera down so that we can fall in love again with the wonder that impels us to pick up the camera and make a canvas of the world. Will our images mean anything in the future? Do they mean anything now? We can look at areas of natural splendour in the world and often a photographer’s images have been instrumental in protecting that small space. Zack Arias’ eloquent and moving video about that questions what it is he does as a photographer came to me as a I picked out details in the near distance of Dooley Waters. Will my images move people to protect the mountain that mesmerizes me so. I’m just a photographer. One of a million who is trying to make a living with a camera in my hand. Will these images do anything for anyone apart from myself. Are they just an attempt to fill a ceasely draining bank account, or can they do more for the mountain and its future.

With these thoughts of the mortality of imagery in my head ;-) I can now reflect on this last weekend’s Drakensberg photography workshop with African Impact. Not everyone makes it to the summit sadly, as was the case this last weekend. However, I am continually amazed at how everyone walks away having created beautiful, often breathtaking imagery. For the few photographers who opted not to go to the summit yesterday, they were treated to the fantastic experience of a full 20 minutes up close to a feeding bearded vulture. Witsieshoek Resort are in the process of a developing a Vulture’s restaurant of the flanks of the hill that looks out towards Phudhatijaba. Jeremiah, responsible for tending to the restaurant is quite protective of his ‘clients’. There are four recognizable individuals that frequent the restaurant, but it is still not necessarily a regular occurance for visitors to see the birds, let alone spend as much time as the photographers did with them.

As I mention in the opening paragraphs, it is sometimes good to put down the camera. Standing above Witches with the photographers that went to the top of the Amphitheatre, watching the sun rise through the distant haze, I noticed that there was a point that the clatter of cameras fell silent. Silence enveloped the small peak that we were standing on. It was as if the mountain were holding its breath. Something made everyone stop focusing on the machine and instead stare into the glowing sky. The mountain’s hold was momentary, but it was there all the same. The Drakensberg left its mark I suspect. Maybe the images won’t necessarily mean anything in the long term. But the memories will.

Murky Days - September Thanda Wildlife workshop

2011-09-26T14:38:00.000+02:00

The weather gremlin was back last week, and with a vengeance! A whole week in Thanda and the sun showed its wonderful face for seemingly a grand total of 5 minutes. Nevertheless, lenses and cameras were out and working hard (Romeo's sounded like a machine gun with an uninterrupted supply of ammunition ;-) ).

For me, when the weather is truly horrible, i.e. lacking in interesting regardless of the time of day, providing nothing but a bland uniform grey light, that's the time to try and get in close and concentrate on the animal's portrai, or a texture in the skin...so long as it's close. Usually the strong constrasty light of a cloudless sky can play havoc with deep shadows obliterating eyes and burning out the highlights to nuclear levels. The soft lighting of a murky sky means that the photographer can work with textures without actually losing the shadows into an inky pit of darkness.

as ever, work with what is given and you can produce great images. Some of which last week's photography students at the Thanda Photography workshop were able to do. We had 9 students, the largest group for the Thanda workshop to date. This comes with pros and cons of course. 9 people have 9 different requirements in terms of what is most important to them to photograph, let alone learn. BUT, and this is a big one, 9 different photographs also bring 9 different unique sets of skills and experience to a group, meaning that if the group works together they can learn that much more from each other!

Photography workshops are not just about learning from the workshop leader. Sure, they might know a thing or two about photography, but as a Monty Cooper -a mentor of mine - pointed out years ago, photography is not just about the technical side of photography, which he criticized me as being too caught up in at the time. What do you see when you take the photograph? Concentrate on the small things (he suggested I actually use programme mode occasionally - students of mine will know that I'm allergic to this mode ;-) - so that I concentrate on the details of the composition rather than the details of the exposure - admittedly I didn't really listen to the programme part, but I did about the details).

So bad colourless drab weather can still be good for photography. Well any weather can be good for photography. It might even push you to try something new indoors, as evinced by the 'last supper' group shot at the start of the post (thanks to Peter and Yossi for the idea).

Constructing the Image

2011-09-18T10:49:00.000+02:00

Ansel Adams commented that you don't take a picture, you create an image. I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment. Novice photographers often 'take pictures', pointing the camera at something that they deem worthy of photographing and capturing a moment in time, often without any preconceived artistry or aesthetic intent. Adams was pointing out that the advanced photographer, an artist essentially, crafts the image through technical and aesthetic ideas that together create an image that is already in the photographers head. This is often termed as 'pre-visualisation', and it's an essential part of good photographic technique.

In the advertising and design world 'pre-visualization' is often spoken of as story-boarding. Create the story, and then shoot for that storyboard. Stills photographers should take a leaf from this book. This is particularly the case when shooting to a brief. However, nature photographers can also learn how to create an image with intent. Good examples can be seen in David Noton's and David Ward's work.

Previsualisation often means that multiple images are required to create the composition that the photographer has in mind. Common multiple image photographs are high dynamic range images and stitched panoramics. One can take the concept further though. Star-trail photography is a case in point. Another example is to introduce elements to a scene that are difficult to combine in a single exposure.

The last is a case in point for a current project that I am working on for a company in Johannesburg (Aluview) that does a lot of work with hotels around the country. The brief includes images of the hotels and their bathrooms for a glossy brochure/company profile. To this end I have had to create architectural images of the hotels themselves, sometimes in lighting conditions that don't gel with my pre-visualized notion of the image. Enter the multiple image capture.

In the two images of the hotels, the Turbine in Knysna and the West Cliff in Joburg, multiple images were captured for the vehicle light trails, sky, shadows and lit signage. In the bathroom example (D'Oreal, Emperor's Palace) a number of images were required to not only get the lighting right, but to achieve this without hot-spot reflections in the glass, or a reflection of the photographer himself (and the temporary assistant who had to crawl next to the toilet under the basin in order to be in the room to switch off lights - via unscrewing the light bulb - while not being in the image itself...thanks Kath!). The jist of this post then is to experiment with multiple image capture in order to introduce new elements into the scene. To do this effectively remember that you have to imagine then final result of the image before you even trip the shutter.

Not Quite Right but Great!

2011-09-12T19:46:00.000+02:00

Sometimes you don’t exactly get what you expected, or rather hoped for, as a landscape photographer. Sometimes the light isn’t quite right, or there is something that obstructs what you feel would make the ultimate composition. Perhaps the clouds aren’t in the right place, or the right shape. Maybe there’s rain instead of sunshine, or even that there’s simply too much sun and not enough cloud. Or maybe you go up the Drakensberg expecting grand vistas and there aren’t because it’s simply that time of year when the haze gets so thick you can barely see to the bottom of the mountain.

This month’s Drakensberg photography workshop was a little like that. Rather than the usual clouds and rain that seem to coincide like clockwork with our workshops, there were no clouds, plenty of harsh sunshine and a whole lot of murky haze. But, you can work with this. This is still the Drakensberg. The photographers handled this with aplomb I thought. When the sun was too strong, use a fellow photographer as a makeshift gobo or sunscreen. When the light was in the wrong place, look for the inner landscapes…beautiful close-ups that show of the mountains as much as the grand vistas do. When the haze is like pea-soup, go abstract and look at the amazing lines that appear instead of the finer details of the valleys below.

Too many photographers put the camera away when the light isn’t quite right. I’m guilty of this myself at times. After a weekend of ‘not-quite right light’, while looking at the images a crit session, Bash, one of the photographers summed it up nicely, :”I wish I had taken more shots”. When life gives you lemon’s - figure out how to light em properly. Group them together for a great still life, get in close for a macro, and then when you are finished make some lemonade.

So, despite lighting that wasn’t right, and situations that weren’t perfect, the Berg was awesome as usual, with some stunning images produced by the photographers. A great bunch that I had the pleasure to spend some time with.

A Mantid Season

2011-09-07T10:19:00.000+02:00

I love summer. Not for the heat, or trips to the beach or anything conventional. No, summer is the time for increased insect activity. Some people at this point would shake their heads while muttering "weird" under their breath. Ah, but for the macro photographer at large this is the time to delve into the plants and look for the little wildlife.

Here are two recent mini safaris that I've had searching for possibly my favourite 'subject' - Mantids. The first was actually a request to photograph a Flower-eyed Mantid in the garden of an apartment block on Durban's Berea. The second was a chance find in our garden.

I've mentioned before that a good way to approach macro photography of insects is to approach it as if you were thinking of doing a portrait shoot in a studio. Due to the low-light nature of macro photography in the wild it is usually essential that artificial light has to be used. In both instances I used a similar setup of a flash in a softbox (home-made) and a second flash unmodified. Although I was using Nikon's Creative Lighting System (CLS), it was purely for triggering purposes as I worked out the flash exposure manually. The softbox light was used as the key light while the second smaller flash was toned down somewhat and used as fill for the leaf and rim light for the Mantid. Bumping up the ISO a touch enabled a little bit of light to filter in from the background so that it wasn't pure black. Even so, considering the shadows and late afternoon light of the second mantid, it's still pretty dark.

It's probably noticeable the difference in depth of field between the two insects as well. The first has considerably more as the pink Flower-eyed Mantid itself was far larger than the second nymph (I'm not sure of the exact species). As a rough estimate once one gets to life-size magnification the depth of field is almost equivalent to the aperture in fractions of a millimeter (so f16 = 0.16mm DoF).

If a black background isn't desired it's easy enough to manoeuvre such that there is a background behind the insect that is close enough that the flash's output can light it. Shooting through a leaf also lights up the leaf, creating a great background glow.

If I have to shoose essential equipment, two flashguns would be it. although a single flashgun mounted in a softbox can create wonderful wrap-like lighting, two flashes open up a world of macro lighting possibilities. You can get more information on lighting setups for macro from my tutorial on the website.

Keep it Moving - Thanda Photography Workshop

2011-08-29T16:31:00.000+02:00

I’ve just finished another Thanda photographic workshop with a great bunch of photographers from the African Impact volunteer programme. For once the weather was perfect (readers of this blog will know that I seem to have a weather gremlin that tests my thesis of ‘bad weather makes for good images’). This month was instead the month of close encounters. A couple of fantastic up-close encounters left the photographers of this month's Thanda Photographic workshop with some incredible images. A close encounter with two of Thanda's elephants had a number of us grinning from ear-to-ear, albeit with hearts still drumming in our ears (when an elephant is so close that the lens hits it's minimum focusing distance you know you are close).

Still, despite close encounters it can get difficult to produce images that are different to the 'same old' that you see produced every single day. Somehow as a photographer you still have to do more than simply get closer. One of the ways in which to separate images from the crowd of ordinary wildlife imagery is to add a sense of movement. Photography is medium of time, although we tend to forget about this element of the image making process. In fact, photography is all about light and time. The shutter speed is usually so fast that the element of time isn’t that obvious, despite the fact that the fast shutter freezes a moment in time. With the ever-increasing low light abilities of digital cameras photographers have been able to use fast shutter speeds even when the light levels are very low. This means that the evocative use of long (ish) exposures seems to be relegated to professional photographers.

This doesn't have to be the case. Creating images with movement doesn't have to be that difficult. Again, modern technology such as in lens vibration reduction (or image stabilization for Canon cameras) makes it even easier to pan with a moving subject so that smooth ‘flow lines’ are visible while keeping the subject close to tack sharp (there is always going to be some loss of critical sharpness, but because of the movement this doesn't matter as much anymore). Panning basically means to move the camera so that the subject stays in the same point of the frame as it moves. The difficult part is to not pan faster or slower than the moving subject. An exposure that doesn't freeze the movement is going to show blur in the areas that were static in the frame (bushes, ground, background) and which were moving in a different direction to the actual pan (legs, arms etc.). Elements of the frame or subject that are moving at the same pace as the pan come out relatively sharp (the head and body of the subject). The longer the exposure the more blur there is and the less chance that there is a sharp area in the frame. The shorter the exposure the less sense of movement there is, but the more chance that the subject is sharp.

In the image of the elephant eye I concentrated on keeping the eye as steady as possible while moving the camera in time with the elephant's head swaying ponderously from side to side. The result is an image that is 'sharp, but not', creating a sense of drama. Although I don't think the giraffe shot is necessarily successful it does demonstrate that the sense of movement can change the overall feeling of an image. The image of the Marabou Stork flying was taken earlier this year and again gives that sense of speed and movement that would be lacking in an image without the blur. Additionally, the bird shot would be criticized as being too far from the action without the blur. Personally, i feel it works at this size (bird in relation to space) because of the blur. Working with slower shutter speeds is more difficult than with fast shutter speeds, but the effort pays off in the long run with genuinely unique imagery. If you simply through glossy coffee-table books by the big gun wildlife photographers one will notice numerous blurred movement images that technically would be slated by camera club enthusiasts and competition judges, but which are spoken about by the authors with pride. Give it a try, slow things down a touch.

Thanks to a wonderful group of photographers this month. I loved your company and am looking forward to meeting some more of you in the Berg in a few week's time. Keep checking as well to see if I can post the call of the Greater Geared Photographer (Maioribus Apparatus pictor)

Snowbound

2011-08-16T19:42:00.001+02:00

When you travel to South Africa from abroad, you don't usually expect to see snow. You definitely don't expect to be trapped by said fluffy white stuff as it precludes all travel...or at least safe travel. That was the situation myself and the workshop attendees found ourselves in at the end of this month's photography workshop in the Drakensberg. Monday morning came with a couple of inches of snow that just kept on piling up. Roads were closed coming into Phudhaditjaba from just about every direction (that didn't stop some 4x4 nuts though what with the opportunity to see some serious snow...South Africans are mad ;-) ).

I can only commend the people at Witsieshoek Resort for their incredible service during our pleasurable incarceration there. Deon and Isabel were phenomenal hosts, allowing us run of the lodge, excellent food and amazing help with electricity and warmth (they had problems of their own with power outages, diminishing supplies of diesel for the generator and stranded staff members). But throughout they kept a steady supply of hot chocolate and coffee coming through to a group of cold photographers as they capitalized on the downtime to process images and make the odd foray to shoot some snow, build an igloo or toboggan down the driveway of the lodge. I can think of few better places to be snowbound in!

Then this morning the clouds lifted and the Amphitheatre was bathed in magical golden light that sparkled off the virgin snow-field that lay around us. Being South Africa things thaw pretty quickly and the fear of black ice on the road was quickly dispelled as winter wonderland rapidly turned to slush central. Before this though there was plenty of opportunity to capture that golden three-dimensional light as it washed over the Amphitheatre and the Mahai Valley below.

If a photographer happens to come from the northern hemisphere photographing snow can oft
en be a commonplace occurance. For those who it isn't it can be a little frustrating dealing with exposure and the cold. Nowadays modern exposure meters are so good that the old over-exposure of snow requirements isn't quite as important as it used to be. Nikon's 3-D colour meter does an amazing job of handling snow. The occasional 2/3rd over-exposure only ever needed to be dialed in occasionally for effective 'expose the the right' metering (admittedly shooting directly into the sun as it filtered throughlow-lying cloud was a little tricker, but nothing that manual and a peek at the histogram couldn't solve). More confusing to photographers who don't shoot in the snowy conditions is condensation on the lens. As the cold moist air comes into contact with the front element of the lens or a filter - like a graduated ND - condensation forms causing the image to lose contrast and clarity. A simple solution, albeit fiddly, is to blow cold dry air onto the glass with the aid of a blower like the Giottos 'Rocket'. This dries the moisture at the same temperature as the ambient temperature. Trying to blow using your mouth simply puts warm moist air into contact with cold glass. Viola, instant fog filter. So, make sure you have a decent blower when heading out to shoot. It's useful for more than just blowing dust from the sensor.

Mountain...What Mountain. It Could be Belgium

2011-08-15T09:26:00.000+02:00

I always seem to wax lyrical about the weather. It's not that I mean to, but bad weather seems to follow me around. It's as if some Norse weather God is laughing jovially to himself as he tests my motto that bad weather makes for good images (it does, it really does - if your camera can survive the cold and rain and your feet don't get frostbite that is). So, there we were. Looking out over the magnificent vista that is the Witches viewpoint...and it could have been Belgium. A whole lotta white met us slap bang in the face...with a very cold wet slap.

Still, the whole weekend didn't have awful weather thankfully. The Drakensberg is like that. Magnificent days are followed by days where a giant sponge is squeezed out over the mountains, drenching everything. Herein lies the moral of the story. Don't trust mountains! They are temperamental beasts, that can turn on you in minutes notice. A quick survey of the deaths in the Drakensberg and one realises that the majority of fatalities have occurred to people who have taken the mountain for granted. A few months ago while walking down from the Chain Ladder and the Amphitheatre we came across two men and a young girl (the daughter of one of the men) walking up. They were dressed completely inadequately in sport shorts and T-shirts... and the weather was closing in. It had already taken them 2 hours to reach a point that should have taken 1. When I suggested that they turn around they indicated that they were prepared for cold weather...they "come from Joburg and it gets cold there".

Great images do come from bad weather. If the photographer is prepared. If you are wet and cold and shivering, the likelihood of taking a spectacular image of dramatic weather and lighting is about nil. Good warm, waterproof, mountain clothing is about as essential to great images as tripod is. I firmly believe that great images happen when you feel you should be elsewhere. Great images don't happen when you are concentrating on your own survival (not true of combat photographers admittedly).

Despite weather everyone had a fantastic time. This says a lot when two of the photographers in the group were struggling from the after effects of tick-bite fever (a perverse trophy from their time in the bush) and a third had some serious malady with her knees. Ah, the joys of hiking and photographing in the mountains. But...beautiful light kissing the flanks of the Amphitheatre at dawn, misty water from roaring Cascades, stars trailing over the Eastern Buttress were all the stuff of photographic nirvana.

Except of course when you are shivering and can't feel your fingers anymore while concentrating on ice that has formed on long grass on the escarpment....So, in the words of Annelies on the top of the mountain as we struggled to motivate image making, "I think I'm done now!"

Ok, so some great images do happen while one is concentrating on survival - so long as the camera is actually used - but they don't tend to involve any acute level of concentration on the image itself ;-)

A cold Postscript: This entry was written while still at the wonderful Witsieshoek at the end of the workshop. It's Monday morning now and we are still at Witsieshoek...and the snow is piling up outside (we're snowed in for the foreseeable future). I'll write again once we finally get off the mountain, but that looks like a couple of days from now...time to go and create some great images in dramatic and cold weather!

Straight outa Star Wars

2011-08-10T08:46:00.000+02:00

This thing was big...and loud. Any second and Luke Skywalker was about to step out of the cockpit. Last week I found myself photographing something called a Compressor Carrier for a industrial hydraulics company based outside Durban. This behemoth is intended to provide massive amounts of compressed air for exploratory drilling in any terrain. It looked mean. To photograph it so that it looked hard and industrial, as well as intimidating I chose a low angle of view. Waiting for low light also meant that I was able to throw some hot-shoe flashes into the mix. The basic setup was a flash on camera set to about 1/2 power, flash to camera left on full power and two more flashes boomed together camera right and about 10 metres in front to light up the side and rear of the machine. Although most of the images were very simply processed, I over processed this for an industrial look that is quite popular at the moment. Lots of fun basically.

Thanda Tripping

2011-08-01T13:40:00.001+02:00

Much of south Africa was gripped with a cold spell that brought snow to the highlands and freezing rain to much of the coast stretching down the east and south of the country. So much for a temperate winter! The photographers I joined on this month's Thanda Wildlife photography workshop came to grips with icy rain and freezing wind as we attempted the impossible...to find animals that were as mad as us in the open.

This isn't actually as easy as one would think. Naturally wild animals don't have a warm centrally heated brick house with double glazing to call home. Still, what shelter they can get they will needless stick to, whether it's a burrow in the ground or a close-standing group of acacia. It's only idiotic wildlife photographers that come out in the open to greet the slushy drops of cold water with apparent glee. Well in the hopes of creating great images at any rate. I have a habit of saying that bad weather means for great images. It often does, but only if something actually happens during that bad weather. Hey ho.

Thankfully the cold spell blew (in a gale force wind) away eventually. It left motorists stranded on a pass between Kwazulu-Natal and the interior as snow built up to over a foot deep on the middle of the highway. In Zululand it meant for uncharacteristically cold and wet winter weather. But shoot on we did!

One of the inherent problems with wildlife photography and game drives is the angle of view that the photographer is forced to accept. Whenever one goes to workshops, reads books, and watches photographers on television, the idea is pounded home that the animal needs to be on the same eye-level as the photographer. The reason why images by the likes of Nick Nichols and Frans Lanting are so powerful is that the camera's lens is on the same level as that of the animal's eye. This creates a connection between the viewer and the subject, a pathos develops if you would like. We are placed in the same 'space' as the animal occupies. This connection is severed once the all-important eye-contact and eye-level view are lost. At what stage in the wild would we possibly be on an angle above a lion?

This is difficult for any enthusiast photographer to deal with. The average enthusiast does not have the means available to photograph big five animals from anything but a game viewer vehicle (traditionally an open top Land Rover or Land Cruiser). Professionals usually put a lot of money and time into getting unique images by getting not only eye-contact, but either eye-level angles or an angle that is out of kilter with the usual view of the animal (think of Nichol's image of a blue gelled Rhino from ground level, his image of a tiger jumping across a stream - and the remote camera, Andy Rouse's shot of a muddy elephant chucking wet mud at a low angle camera). They do this by using remote camera's, special vehicles, and, getting out of the vehicle. This is not something your average photographer is even allowed to do. So what do you do?

Get down as low as possible in the vehicle. With birds, try and get the guide to start looking out for birds that are at eye-level to you. Ask the guide about spots where the vehicle is likely to go into a hollow in the track or road that could work for animals. The above shot of a yawning lioness is one of my favourite sites for lions in Thanda Reserve. Here a low dam wall is a regular chill spot for the resident pride of lions. The game viewer ends up being just below the lion's eye-level...perfect for that low level kind of image. Use the guide's knowledge to be able to get good shots. Impress upon them the importance of angle of view. Also, be prepared to accept that getting the incredible Cheetah shot might not happen, but the killer image of a Lilac-breasted Roller, might just.

Thanks to a wonderful crew this last month. I enjoyed working with a keen and advanced group that were game for mad dashes in the rain. Now I'm holding thumbs that the sun stays out long enough to dry them and the animals off!

Wowwee...new toys (or so what?)

2011-07-23T09:10:00.000+02:00

It seems there's a plethora of new toys imminent. If you read the countless blogs and sites that predict such things it becomes quickly apparent that both Canon and Nikon are about to announce new gear that is guaranteed to get the pulse of even the least ardent gearheads racing. But should they really get excited? What exactly is the fuss likely to be about? More megapixels? Maybe better low light ability? How about a better build? Or maybe even a faster frame rate? I'll leave video aside for the moment as I'm a stills photographer so haven't dabbled in this esoteric - to me at least - branch of the imaging world).

Hang on a second. Are more megapixels necessary? Currently you can get above 20mp with a number of cameras including the affordable Sony A900 and A850. Then there's the Canon 5Dmk II as well as the more expensive 1Ds mk III and the Nikon D3x. Okay, so maybe you'll cry poverty and say that even Sony's offerings are too expensive. I'd argue that 20+ mp isn't actually necessary in any case. The 12mp D700 performs incredibly well even above A3+ print size (I've had a 5m wide mural printed from a 12mp file and last year shot my biggest assignment was shot on a D700 - the format of the book was A3 landscape and there were a number of full bleed images in it). Suddenly we realise that the current benchmark is around 14-16mp in enthusiast and even entry-level DSLRs. The Nikon D7000 is quite frankly incredible. The Canon 7D is one of the best cameras I've ever held and shot with. Then there is the aging but wonderfully versatile Nikon D300 and the more than serviceable Canon 50D. My favourite of course is Nikon's D700 which also ticks the low-light performance box (I've shot events happily at 3200 ISO and even punched up to 6400 without any serious issues).

Ah, the thorny issue of build quality. Well, we already have it in spades. Nikon's enthusiast range is practically bomb-proof and Canon is no slouch either (although I'd question their entry level build to be honest). Build quality is not going to improve for any of the entry-levels in any case, and is pretty much state of the art in the professional grade cameras already. Similarly frame rate is only really going to affect the pro bodies.

Now it's practically guaranteed that video performance is going to improve. As I mention above this doesn't affect me. I suspect that it doesn't really affect a great number of photographers out there. For a brief while the DSLR has reigned champion in the shallow depth of field camp for videographers. Now with the introduction of several APS-C format sensor video cameras I suspect that better video performance in a stills camera is going to be less exciting for videographers.

As photographers we have never had it this good. There is really isn't a single digital SLR out there that cannot produce top quality imagery given the ability of the photographer. Quite frankly it isn't the gear that makes great images, it's the photographer. Buying a new camera isn't going to suddenly improve one's abilities. I freely admit that I will be amongst the ranks that have mop up my own drool when the new glut of cameras start being announced in the coming two months. Will I actually go out and buy them? Maybe if my current setup breaks, then yes. I have it good right now. This is just a guess, but I suspect a good one nonetheless. A vast number of buyers who dish out money for the new equipment will already have perfectly good gear on hand right now. what comes in the next short while is not going to revolutionize the average photographer's work (unless of course the manufacturers bring out a paradigm shifter of a camera...which is highly unlikely). So get to love what you have...a smile broadly when you can buy a D3x or 1DsmkIII for peanuts secondhand when some well-monied photog believes that the new whatchamacallit is going to improve their images.

A Pleasant Dream

2011-07-11T09:49:00.002+02:00

What with the rush to go all nostalgic in some quarters I thought I'd put out my Christmas gear wish and maybe St. Nikon will listen (yup that's likely!). Said rush obviously refers to some of the more retrospective styled cameras that can be found on dealers shelves. The camera that knocked the socks off the enthusiast buying public is of course the Fuji X100. This small range-finderesque camera harks back to an era of photographer centric machines that were a joy to use as much as to hold and look at (if you are that way inclined...sadly I am as a shelf of antiquated but beautiful cameras in my studio attests to). Leica of course have their highly sought after, but seldom owned (it's the same price as a small car) M9 and Pentax have recently tried to jump on the band-wagon with the newly announced Pentax Q interchangeable lens camera. Forum also abound as to the use of older M42 Leica lenses on a the new glut of Micro four thirds cameras in a bid to create an affordable 'Leica-like' manual camera.

From what I can tell there are a couple of points which excite people about these cameras:

Interchangeable lenses (except of course for the X100 which almost immediately drew criticism that it was an interchangeable lens camera, to which rumors now abound that Fuji will indeed pursue such a camera).
Simplified manual controls (Having played with a Leica M9 I have to admit it was sheer joy using the simple dials and buttons of pre-electric cameras. The true irony is that an experienced photographer can work faster with the older controls ala the Nikon F4 and and FM than the newer button frenzied layout of say the D5100).
Small (Forget pocketable for the time being. Compare a D3 with an FM and you get my meaning. The modern well built camera can be used as a stop for a truck on a hill. It's big, it's heavy).
Good image quality coupled to RAW image capture.

So with this is mind comes my Christmas wish from Nikon (quite frankly any camera manufacturer but Nikon and Pentax are those best placed to perform such a request). Nikon (and Pentax) both have in their parts inventories the necessary bits as well as knowledge to create such a camera with relatively little R&D. There obviously are some complications inherent in what I am about to put forward, but they are nowhere near the league of complications that arise with massive frame rates and video abilities etc. etc. etc.

So, why not create a digital solution for the old manual metal cameras such as the Nikon FM? Nikon has produced the most incredible cult classic in the chassis of the FM. Not only that but the FM spawned a legacy of cameras - the FM, FE, FM2, FE2 and FM3a - that had interchangeable accessories, the back and MD12 motordrive which are the most important in this case.

Why not create a digital back connected to an MD12 chassis that can be attached to any of the FM series cameras, or at the very least the FM2 and up (The FM lacked some of the electrical components of the the later models). The parts are there. I suspect that the buyers are there too. For a second just consider the D700 without the vertical grip. This is a fairly small camera in terms of full frame offerings. The surprising thing is that an FM2 with motordrive is only marginally larger and heavier. Place an EL-e3a battery in the MD-12 and the weight actually goes down.

What the buyer of such a camera wants is not a million frames a second, or even 5 for that matter. They don't necessary want video capabilities or even live view (although admittedly that would be nice for critical focusing). Yes Nikon (or Pentax), you will be chastised by the internet reviewers for not including video, and all the other niceties of the modern uba-DSLR, but I don't know a single avid enthusiast who will not want that camera. Go beyond these requests (like doing all this in just a bolt on back with manual advance) and the Nikon fraternity will beat a path to your door. Well that's what I think at any rate.

addendum: The reason I say Pentax is also capable of doing this is that both Nikon and Pentax are the only manufacturers of DSLRs that still have the same lens mount (I leave Leica R out of the equation here) as when they originally introduced bayonet lens mounts. This means that an autofocus lens will happily sit on an old brass bodied camera such as the FM or Pentax's classic K1000 or ME Super, so long as the lens still has an aperture ring.

Software Choices

2011-06-21T09:23:00.002+02:00

A question I’m often asked by students is what software I use or recommend. The usual assumption is that what I use is probably the right software. The thing is there is no such thing as the right software. The average photographer has to precariously balance what they need, what they want and what they can afford. There is a very big difference between all three of these. I don’t know a single photographer who wouldn’t like to own every bit of photo manipulation software ever made. Creating a panoramic? Great, I’ll use the latest and greatest Panorama X-factor 64-bit software that makes a cup of tea while rendering the image. But having all of this software costs money, so we end up choosing less and concentrating more on what we need (with an unhealthy dose of what we want).

The reality is that we can get away with what we need for gratis. You don’t have to spend a cent except on bandwidth. I don’t mean pirated software either. Camera manufacturers provide basic software with the camera. If you are shooting Nikon, Nikon View NX2 comes bundled and for free. You can even download it from the site without so much as paying a cent. The same Canon and Sony systems. From there is you need to do some serious pixel bending, there’s the incredibly versatile, and again free, Gimp photo editing software. As good as the free options are though; they aren’t necessarily the best, the fastest or the most efficient programs. So we end up having to spend money.

Click through for more....

The software I use has been selected carefully for the purposes need it for and is also, more importantly, what I can afford. I find that certain programs do certain things better than others. So, for one image I might find myself using Nikon Capture, while for another Adobe Photoshop. I recently wrote to a well-known internet pundit to ask this same question. He had written about the merits of a particular program, so I asked whether he used one program for everything. The answer, No. some programs are simply better at certain tasks than others.

With all of the above in mind, these are the programs I use and why.

For image ingest and keywording I currently use Photo Mechanic. I really like the fact that I can embed IPTC data into my RAW files, meaning that I’m not going to have tiny XMP files floating about all over the place. What I don’t like about PM is that it is pretty slow compared to some other ingest software. But I love the keywording features, so it really is software of choice for that feature.

RAW editing depends on the nature of the work itself. For fine art and stock photography I find myself using Nikon’s Capture NX2 software. I love the final image quality that I get out of the image. I’m also particularly fond of Control Point feature for image editing (yes I could buy Viveza but that’s yet more money – remember the balance with what you can afford). The major problem with NX2 is it is slooooow. I’ve added years to my life while waiting for the program to respond to some of the simplest commands. But, I keep coming back to it for fine image editing.

Photoshop’s Adobe Camera RAW (ACR), bundled with Photoshop is another excellent RAW editing program which I use often. The thing I don’t like about it is that I can’t embed the RAW changes into the file (I really don’t like those little XMPs. I also find that straight into the computer, NX2 creates a better image as it’s using the camera information more effectively than Adobe’s offerings do (although they are pretty darn good at it). To be honest I juggle between the two according to how patient I’m feeling.

Then there’s Lightroom. Lightroom has the major advantage of speed. Lots of it. This is my goto choice when I have to churn out lots of photos (think events and weddings) in a short space of time. Yes, I have those darned XMP files again, but for single shoots it’s a pain I can live with. Besides, they are neatly stored inside my Lightroom catalogue. The other thing that Lightroom simply excels at is image cataloguing. As mentioned, I hate XMPs, but if Lightroom is handling bitmap images (i.e. PSD, jpeg and Tiff) then xmps are no longer an issue really. So I absolutely love Lightroom for my library of Tiffs. From these I can easily resize and save as various file types at the click of a button. There are even free lightroom plugins that enable me to export images straight into internet services such as Pixoasis (an online file delivery service that I use), Smugmug, Flickr and the ubiquitous (and dreaded) Facebook.

Odd little programmes that I use include a very outdated version of Neat Image, which still does a fantastic job of cleaning up film images of visible grain and noisy digital images, and HDRsoft’s Photomatix Pro for the occasional HDR image that I do fully automated (rare as I prefer manually blending exposures in Photoshop).

So here’s my software workflow for one of my individual images that requires top notch image quality.

Ingest using Photo Mechanic, putting in all the necessary metadata and initial keywords. Of course, because it is PM these are all embedded in the RAW image. I’ll proceed to initial edit of the batch which includes renaming and categorizing while in PM.
From PM I can open my files directly into Nikon Capture NX2 for the RAW edit. Saved 16 bit Adobe RGB or ProPhoto Wide RGB images get saved into a ‘in process’ folder.
Bitmap images that have now been dealt with by NX2 now get imported into my Tif library which is essentially managed by Lightroom (therefore they get imported into Lightroom). From Lightroom I can do my final editing in Photoshop.
Final keywording for stock images happens in Photo Mechanic and I simply sync my folder in Lightroom to update any changes to the metadata.

So why complicate it with Photo Mechanic and NX2? Photo Mechanic just handles RAW metadata so much better than Adobe. If Lightroom could embed data into the RAW it would become the only cataloguing necessary. But it doesn’t, so I still need PM. Then there’s the image quality of NX2. It is simply superb. Lightroom and ACR come close, but NX2 simply handles highlights better. Noise is also slightly more ‘filmic’ than Adobe’s renderings (in my opinion, which some people would disagree with).

Sadly, there is no such thing as a do everything optimally programme. One day there might be, but it’s doubtful. The closest you will get is Photoshop with its attached Bridge. However, it’s a little bit like the all-purpose family car. It can do everything, it’s just that there are times that you might need that 4x4, sports car or pick-up truck. The software I use, as I said, is a personal choice. Because I use it doesn’t mean that it’s the right thing for everybody to use. It does work for me though. Until something else comes out that is :-)