Lionheart

Psalm 109

2012-05-27T10:17:00.001Z

Plea for Judgment of False Accusers

To the Chief Musician. A Psalm of David.

109 Do not keep silent,

O God of my praise!
2 For the mouth of the wicked and the mouth of the deceitful
Have opened against me;
They have spoken against me with a lying tongue.
3 They have also surrounded me with words of hatred,
And fought against me without a cause.
4 In return for my love they are my accusers,
But I give myself to prayer.
5 Thus they have rewarded me evil for good,
And hatred for my love.

6 Set a wicked man over him,
And let an accuser stand at his right hand.
7 When he is judged, let him be found guilty,
And let his prayer become sin.
8 Let his days be few,
And let another take his office.
9 Let his children be fatherless,
And his wife a widow.
10 Let his children continually be vagabonds, and beg;
Let them seek their bread[b] also from their desolate places.
11 Let the creditor seize all that he has,
And let strangers plunder his labor.
12 Let there be none to extend mercy to him,
Nor let there be any to favor his fatherless children.
13 Let his posterity be cut off,
And in the generation following let their name be blotted out.

14 Let the iniquity of his fathers be remembered before the Lord,
And let not the sin of his mother be blotted out.
15 Let them be continually before the Lord,
That He may cut off the memory of them from the earth;
16 Because he did not remember to show mercy,
But persecuted the poor and needy man,
That he might even slay the broken in heart.
17 As he loved cursing, so let it come to him;
As he did not delight in blessing, so let it be far from him.
18 As he clothed himself with cursing as with his garment,
So let it enter his body like water,
And like oil into his bones.
19 Let it be to him like the garment which covers him,
And for a belt with which he girds himself continually.
20 Let this be the Lord’s reward to my accusers,
And to those who speak evil against my person.

21 But You, O GOD the Lord,
Deal with me for Your name’s sake;
Because Your mercy is good, deliver me.
22 For I am poor and needy,
And my heart is wounded within me.
23 I am gone like a shadow when it lengthens;
I am shaken off like a locust.
24 My knees are weak through fasting,
And my flesh is feeble from lack of fatness.
25 I also have become a reproach to them;
When they look at me, they shake their heads.

26 Help me, O Lord my God!
Oh, save me according to Your mercy,
27 That they may know that this is Your hand—
That You, Lord, have done it!
28 Let them curse, but You bless;
When they arise, let them be ashamed,
But let Your servant rejoice.
29 Let my accusers be clothed with shame,
And let them cover themselves with their own disgrace as with a mantle.

30 I will greatly praise the Lord with my mouth;
Yes, I will praise Him among the multitude.
31 For He shall stand at the right hand of the poor,
To save him from those who condemn him.

Bribery detective works for a leading bank

2012-05-27T09:51:00.004Z

Daily Mail: Bribery detective works for RBS

Anti-corruption officer arrested last week for corruption at the heart of the Metropolitan police works inside a bank.

This all has to do with pressure put on the British media by Met officers not to report on criminal cases (one in question) due to large personal financial payments received.

Makes a little more sense why Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake has been protected from the Breivik enquiry and any serious media exposure when he works in another high profile bank operating out of London, an EU operated bank at that.

All these links to banks in London, a murdered MI6 officer, a mass murder of innocent kids in Norway and a massive Norwegian oil & gas deal with Russia worth hundreds of billions of dollars, amongst other things.

Further reading: Lake's international bank

Russian - Norwegian Oil & Gas deal

2012-05-26T13:19:00.006Z

Aftenposten: Norwegian - Russian deal on shaky ground

Russia's Putin and the head of Norway's oil & gas industry yesterday in Moscow.

Is it all a big coincidence?

Asymmetric warfare in the age of international oil and gas crisis.

It all makes sense to me now and I have the explanation and understanding that makes it complete to me.

There are different layers to Breivik with different people's involvement, all for different reasons that dovetail with one another, but one hand behind them all with the biggest reason being big money - Hundreds of Billions of Dollars

Is that worth setting up a long term project for?

Breivik was the brainwashed pawn and made the whole thing on his level be about "right wing politics" that deflects all attention from the real higher source and reason behind him and his political terrorist attacks.

The Norwegian State want the world to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one because if he is connected to someone then there is a trail back to those who are involved for whatever reason and those in control of the Breivik enquiry do not want that which is why there is a cover-up of the truth.

My full explanation coming soon.

Norwegian psychiatry having its own mental breakdown

2012-05-25T14:22:00.003Z

It is taboo to criticise the State’s case against Breivik in Norway even in the face of overwhelming evidence and this saga now being played out in the court room over the psychiatric reports tells a very clear story.

It is a wonder how there has not been some type of higher intervention for the sake of the ‘rule of law’ in Norway, instead everyone involved are trying to play the situation down and play it cool when anyone from the outside who knows the facts can clearly see what is happening which is a travesty of justice.

The first psychiatric report carried out on Breivik concluded that he was a paranoid schizophrenic who was psychotic at the time of his actions.

This was in-part based upon the fact that Breivik claimed he was connected to other people as part of a group/network.

The Norwegian police at the time of the first report did not believe this and told the psychiatrists that they had finished this line of enquiry and they were satisfied he was totally alone in the entirety of his actions.

So in Breivik’s first report any talk of other people’s involvement was classed as delusions of a paranoid mind, thus schizophrenic in the eyes of his Dr’s.

3 weeks before trial it emerged that the police had lied to the first set of psychiatrists 6 months before and they had not finished this line of enquiry when they said they had which meant they were not satisfied he was totally alone. This means the first psychiatric report is an unsafe report because it was founded upon critical misleading information which the psychiatrists used to form the fundamental basis of their diagnosis.

It should be thrown out of the court on that one point alone.

The second serious flaw that the report was built around was Breivik’s mother’s opinion of her son.

She made some allegations to the first set of psychiatrists that made Breivik look insane, along with actually claiming in a round a bout way that he was insane.

The time period she talks about her son’s mental state of mind it emerged that she had laundered through her own bank accounts over $600,000 from Breivik’s network of offshore international banks that is said to be the proceeds of an online fake diploma operation but in all likelihood is the financing of international terrorism.

From a legal point of view should the opinion of a co-conspirator to a crime be used to form the basis of an ‘official’ report over someone’s mental state of mind?

That is another fundamental flaw in the first psychiatric report.

Anyone reading this knows that based upon those 2 points above the first psychiatric report carried out on Breivik is an unsafe report and has no legal grounds to even be in the courts proceedings any more.

The psychiatric commission overseeing Breivik’s trial do not think so, on the contrary they believe the first report is stronger than the second report.

They have not made one criticism of the first psychiatric report even though they know it is an unsafe report and even go as far as promoting it as taking precedence over the second report that came to a completely contradictory conclusion about Breivik’s state of mind which they keep undermining in the media for the purpose of influencing the mind of the public to the end result they want.

Call it conditioning of the masses through their control of the ‘official’ case.

All leading professionals in the field of psychiatry in Norway do not believe in the authority of the first psychiatric report or its diagnosis, with their being mumblings from certain quarters of the commission now being on a suicide path with its actions.

I don’t know about a suicide path, it is criminal in nature and should be fully investigated!

The Norwegian State in no way want Breivik to be declared sane because that would contradict the end result they want which is Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one who is insane, and mean that anyone intimately involved with him and his crimes would escape justice.

This is called a State sanctioned cover-up of the truth then you question the reasons.

If he is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one then those behind him who attempted to frame me to be their fall guy get away with their actions on an ‘official’ basis along with their complicity to Breivik’s crimes.

How is that justice?

Then ask yourself why the Norwegian State would want to cover up the whole case and white-wash it?

That was my big question until it was revealed to me.

What is now playing out in the court room over the 2 psychiatric reports clearly shows there is a State hand at work controlling the psychiatric commission proving that it is not an impartial legal proceeding that you would expect in a Democracy to any international observers following the case.

The first State sanctioned psychiatric report has been cleared by the commission with absolutely no criticisms even though it is fundamentally flawed and is being guarded as the State’s authority and case against Breivik because they need the ‘insane’ label on him to complete the cover-up. The second psychiatric report that was undertaken on behalf of many of the families of Utoya and many leading professionals in the field of psychiatry in Norway who criticised the prognosis of the first report is being heavily criticised and undermined through the media by the commission overseeing the trial.

The second report has no such legal fundamental flaws as the first report but is the one being challenged by the commission and the first is legally fundamentally flawed and it has not been challenged once.

It is as clear as day if you are willing to admit to yourself that something untoward is going on in Norway.

You can call it a conspiracy theory to think that there is something very wrong happening in Norway and in this instance over the 2 psychiatric reports, but go look at the evidence in the embedded links, draw your own conclusion from them and form your own opinion about what is happening.

You do not need a degree in law to see the first report is flawed.

If you agree that the first report is fundamentally flawed then you have to accept that something that breaks the ‘rule of law’ in a Democracy is happening in Norway by those who control the State apparatus so as to cover-up the real truth behind Breivik the worst mass murderer in Europe of the 21st Century who carried out his acts in the name of politics because of his controllers.

I do not support Breivik or defend him but if the Norwegian State secure the "solo terrorist" who is 'insane' label on Breivik it means that his controllers get away with their actions not just against me but also everyone else effected by the events of July 22nd 2011 in Norway, endorsed by the current Norwegian State apparatus who are attempting to cover-up the truth from the public.

Dagbladet: We stand in wonder

VG: Breivik's Facebook accounts

A question for perspectives

2012-05-24T14:36:00.009Z

Update 25/05: Russian Norwegian oil deal in crisis

The Security surrounding Utoya island was not stepped up in-light of the Government building bombing in Oslo, only the Leader and Deputy leader of the Government's youth wing were removed from the summer camp to safety before Breivik arrived, leaving the rest of the innocent kids trapped on the island with Breivik hunting them down for execution whilst dressed as a police man in what he called a coup de tat as part of a Norwegian anti-communist resistance movement he says he belongs to.

Further reading: Norwegian prosecutors in denial

Further reading: Breivik admits Gladio

Video: Gladio & 'Operation Breivik'

BBC News: Russian - Norway oil deal

More proof of a Norwegian Government cover-up

2012-05-23T12:05:00.007Z

There can be no doubt now about what is going on in Norway and I have what I believe is the understanding and explanation of the whole thing now which will be explained in my next post.

There are 2 clear components to the Norwegian State's case against Breivik and the end result they want which is Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane'. Then the real truth behind Breivik is covered up from the public and those other people with a hand in the events of July 22nd 2011 walk free from their crimes.

The first is the PST's prosecution script against Breivik that the Prosecutors are presenting in the court room and the second is the first psychiatric report.

Both of these on behalf of the State are fundamentally flawed when you look at them properly in context of the evidence yet the Norwegian Government controlled State apparatus refuse to admit this in the eyes of the public and are sticking to their 'official' script even though it is full of holes that any outside observer can see.

Even though the first psychiatric report is fundamentally flawed and has no legal grounds to even be in the court room, the psychiatric commission charged with overseeing the case are continually undermining the second report with not one word said against the first State sanctioned report.

This can only mean that just like the prosecutors are puppets on strings for their State masters, the actor's on the commission are the same when the second report has no fundamental flaws and the first is built around fundamental flaws yet they criticise the second and ignore the first which can only mean one thing and that is they are working towards the same Norwegian State sanctioned script as the prosecutors and want the 'insane' label on Breivik.

That is taboo to think or say though.

They cannot now turn around and say anything else just like the State prosecutors, they are all trapped in their State sanctioned lies in front of the Worlds media.

If the Norwegian Armed Forces check the political background of everyone overseeing the State's case against Breivik I am pretty sure that you will find that they are all State appointed and part of the Labour Government infrastructure of the Country which is why they are all involved in the cover-up of the case whether they realise it or not.

They are all doing what they are told by their political masters!

They are all signing from the same hymn sheet handed down to them from above even though everyone with a brain can now see what is going on and it is a case of corruption of the very worst kind in the scheme of the whole thing.

Call it a conspiracy theory but it is built upon very clear evidence which tells the story on its own, and at the heart of this is the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian children on their summer camp with many more wounded for life.

Norway is ruled by a Marxist Dictatorship and not a Democracy which means they control the infrastructure of the Country and have their carefully selected and appointed people in positions of power over all institutions and organs of State that go towards the running of the Country.

This is very clear now with the Breivik case and the subsequent attempted cover-up.

People will say why and for what reason, which will be explained next time, but one thing I will say is who has the biggest oil and gas contracts with Norway the 3rd richest Nation on Earth and would want to make sure this Marxist Labour Government stayed in power for the next 20 years in the age of international oil and gas crisis?

I am sure the current Norwegian Government wants to stay in power too over their control of the infrastructure of the Country that has taken them many years to take a hold of.

Those kids of Utoya were expendable to their political masters and their long term political project but their Youth leader and Deputy leader were not because these protege's are seen as future heir's of the Labour leadership throne which is why they were removed from Utoya before Breivik unleashed his carnage that day.

It all fits into place now...

The Norwegian military should expel that Government on-behalf of the King if this is proven (all State actors in this case being Labour government activists) and they should have support from the international community in the process. This is exactly what the Arab spring is all about when there are Dictatorships abusing their power over the people who want Democracy and this with Norway is in Northern Europe with the head of the UN mission in Syria a Norwegian General.

VG: The Forensic commission

Quote: It's getting hard to find people who support Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim conclusions about paranoid schizophrenia. (The first report)

Just Psychiatry Terje Tørrissen and Agnar Aspaas found no evidence that Anders Breivik Behring is paranoid schizophrenic. did not psychiatric nurses or doctors at Ila Prison countries that received Breivik 22 July last year and has had regular supervision of him. Or the experienced psychiatrist right Randi Rosenqvist evaluating Breivik and wrote three reports about him on behalf of Ila.

Professor of Psychiatry, Einar Kringlen, who first supported the conclusions of the first report before he had seen Breivik, has been reversed. Henning Værøy, one of the most widely used legal psychiatrists, sees no signs of psychosis . Psychiatrist Find Skårderud recently told NRK that the discussion could be almost called off; Breivik is clearly not paranoid schizophrenic

Aftenposten: A deliberate bone hook

Quote: The forensic commission is doing its best to undermine the recent psychiatric report's credibility.(second report)

In November came the report that psychiatrists Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim declared that Anders Breivik Behring was criminally irresponsible (first report). From the beginning created the debate, but the forensic commission was not in doubt: The report was approved without objection - and without a single additional question.

Since then a whole bunch of psychiatrists contributed criticism. Most killing is a professor of psychiatry Sigmund Karterud been. In a VG interview he says in plain language that the Commission is about to lose all credibility.

And it does not stop there: It was a mistake made by Husby and Sørheim the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenic, and it was a mistake made by the Commission to approve this erroneous conclusion. A conclusion that is now "limits to professional suicide."

You mean that is a professor Karterud.

Dagbladet: The first report is stronger

Quote: The first report, from psychiatrists Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim, the answer was "no substantial remarks."

Corruption at the Met

2012-05-23T10:00:00.003Z

Guardian: Met's anti-corruption allegations

Quote: On Tuesday, the Commons home affairs select committee was told by a lawyer involved in the case that invoices showed about £20,000 of potential payments to police officers in what amounted to an undetected case of "apparent corruption right at the heart of Scotland Yard".

In recent weeks, as the Guardian investigated the allegations, the Met has sought to discourage the paper from publishing details about the case. But , after MPs heard the evidence, the Met dropped its previous insistence that there was "evidence that casts doubt on the credibility" of the allegations.

A police source with knowledge of the investigation, which has been ongoing since October, said developments over the last 24 hours had now led police to take the allegations more seriously.

Is this what has been happening with Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake considering all evidence points to the fact that he is Breivik's English 'mentor' but no newspaper has carried out a thorough expose detailing all of the links for the public yet.

He is connected to people right up into the heart of the British Establishment and works for the EU bank so it would not be surprising that there are people out there who do not want this information about Alan Ayling and his extra curricula political activities in the public domain because of people's reputations.

They do not care about the young people who are dead now after the events in Norway last year, they just care about themselves and their reputations and have the money and political influence to 'pervert the course of justice' to protect themselves.

Further reading: Alan Lake's bank

Norwegian Armed Forces getting involved

2012-05-22T11:27:00.005Z

Dagbladet: Breivik

Quote: The indictment against Anders Breivik Behring is designed in that he is insane. Armed Forces want to change this, but then it could be proved that the first report based on an erroneous basis, says legal commentator Egeland.

I dont know whether the google translate is correct but if it is it looks like the Norwegian Armed Forces are stepping in to the legal case against Breivik which in the scheme of things is the right thing to do now considering there is a State sanctioned cover-up of the truth taking place.

All the unanswered questions that completely contradict the Norwegian State script writers case surrounding Breivik.

As the quote states the case against Breivik is designed to enforce the 'insane' label on him rather than allow the 'rule of law' take it's natural course through the judicial process which is the usual and normal workings inside a Democracy.

If this does not happen then the Country cannot claim to be a Democracy and is nothing more than a Dictatorship with the rulers abusing their power over those they rule over for their own purposes and in this case white-washing the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian children for political purposes.

Breivik is guilty of his crimes against humanity that saw him target a group of innocent children in the name of right-wing politics and he should be punished with the full force of the law for the crimes he has committed but to refuse he is connected to anyone means that I was not set up to be the fall guy for the events that day by others, and I was.

All evidence proves my Norwegian Police witness statement to be correct only the Norwegian State script writers who are in control of the State's case against Breivik disagree and claim he is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which means those who set me up get away with it.

You must be mad to think Breivik the son of the Norwegian diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mother's home who carried out the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century calling it a coup de tat.

Not only that but he was also an avid international traveler which shatters that illusion in the eyes of anyone with half a brain, only the Norwegian script writers do not think so and discount everything because it goes against the story they want the public to believe.

The 'insane' label would make it seem convincing in the eyes of the public though who do not know the full facts to the case, and would mean the real truth behind Breivik and those connected to him would be hidden behind closed doors by the political rulers of Norway.

And those who set me up would get away with their actions towards me, along with their complicity in Breiviks atrocities.

How is that justice?

You ask any lawyer with some 'balls' willing to speak in the interest of the integrity of the 'rule of law' whether or not Breivik's first psychiatric report has any legal basis to be in the courts proceedings when you look at some of the key points it was created upon that the psychiatrists then passed their clinical position over and place that in the Norwegian newspapers for the public to read.

To criticise the integrity of the first psychiatric report does not mean you support Breivik it means you are passing a professional opinion on a legal question irrespective of the case.

I am not a lawyer and it is blatantly obvious to me.

If from a legal stand point it has no basis to be in the court room then why have the judges not thrown it out?

Is that not criminal in nature and intent from a legal standpoint for it to still be there if it has no legal basis to be there?

The whole thing stinks!

It is about time 'truth & justice' prevailed...

Aftenposten: Got the court to laugh

Alan Lake's international Bank

2012-05-21T10:37:00.006Z

Times of Malta: EBRD's 1 billion for Arab democracies

It was reported in yesterday’s paper that the bank Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake works for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has set up offices in many of the Islamic Countries where there has been an Arab spring with 1 billion investment now going into those Countries.

That’s a serious bank and not your local high street Barclays.

Alan Ayling is not just floor staff in the bank either he is a trusted manager working overseeing the Oracle database.

The bank has a political mandate in the Countries it works in and is run by the European Union with a new British President just being instilled who takes over from a German. This move instilling a British President goes against the usual order of things because it was said that due to the fact that the banks headquarters are in London there would not be a British President.

I wonder why the change of heart.

The good thing is, is that the new head is a top civil servant in the justice ministry which might mean he will get to the bottom of Ayling and the extra curricula political activities he was involved in whilst working for the bank and reveal the information needed for the Breivik enquiry.

It all makes a little more sense now and shows why Ayling has been shielded from the Breivik enquiry and gives an insight into the types of high level European connections aside from his known British connections he has who I am sure have been supporting and endorsing his extra curricula political activities.

How damaging would it be for the reputation of the bank if it was proven that Ayling is the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik the mass murdering political terrorist who murdered a load of children in the name of right-wing politics?

Is that enough for ‘dark forces’ to attempt to influence and close down the investigation on all levels, not only that there is the possibility that there are forces from within working alongside him so are acting in their own interests too but that’s just speculation.

A secretive funny hand shake group of politically minded people working in banks or involved with the banks.

Who knows what has been going on inside their world of money, politics, espionage and foreign Countries over the years? You can see what Ayling has been doing for the past few years whilst working inside the bank though because it is all over the internet.

Preaching his right wing politics around Europe and being the director behind the hijacked English Defence League and attempting to create a Europe wide movement on the back of it which you would have thought conflicted with his day job in the EBRD bank.

You cannot say MI5 or MI6 do not know all of this so the question is whether or not he is an agent or asset of the State which could be another reason why he has been protected from the enquiry because how would that then look if he is the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik and is a British agent?

He also has contacts in the Swedish Government and Norwegian Government, so you can see that his influence stretches beyond the EU bank that he works for and into international politics which is in-line with the mandate of the bank.

I reckon his ego has turned into megalomania now though because of what he has been involved in, the people he has been involved with, and that is what is now going to be his downfall, along with attempting to accuse one of God’s anointed for his evil.

There is no doubt in my mind that he is Breivik’s English ‘mentor’, I knew from the very beginning once God had shown me what was going on, and now all evidence proves that claim to be completely correct. He fits the picture and profile perfectly, only no action has been taken against him yet which can only mean he has people higher than him who are supporting him and endorsing him who are able to influence the ‘rule of law’ which would fit in-line with Breivik’s claim of being part of a neo-Gladio group sanctioned by someone (plural) somewhere.

The head of the British police has stated that MI6 are not above the law so that means that Ayling is not above the law either so his friend ‘Richard the Lionhearts’ identity will have to be revealed.

Breivik’s preparations countdown for his July 22nd 2011 attacks is in the exact same time frame as the founding of the English Defence League where Ayling and the anonymous ‘Richard the Lionheart’ were both present and integral.

A targeted terrorist attack against a group of innocent kids in Norway on their summer camp who were trapped on an island with the attempted blame then placed upon me to remove the threat to his continued political agenda and for a nice clean media story in the aftermath to deflect all attention from the real source of the attacks, and then the subsequent Norwegian Government cover-up.

The cover-up is all on the highest levels which means the fraternities all know the real truth behind this and view those dead innocent children and their families with contempt, along with myself who they tried to blame for being behind the atrocity.

The biggest mistake that was an act of God is the ‘Richard the Lionheart’ link who is directly connected to Ayling and has yet to be revealed to the public so as to be able to be understood in context within the whole Breivik case and prove that Ayling is behind Breivik and that there is a much larger conspiracy behind the Norwegian ‘official’ claim of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one.

A neo-Gladio attack, with the son of a Norwegian foreign diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major recruited for the job.

3 independent witnesses other than Ayling and an email prove this persons existence so the British police and Norwegian police have no alternative but to reveal his identity to the public following the case.

They have not done this yet in the interest of ‘truth & justice’.

The worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century and this persons identity is now crucial to understanding the whole case which is in the interest of ‘truth & justice’ against those evil forces in high places who think they are more equal than others and can get away with their heinous crimes. If the public knew this information that is missing from the enquiry they would expect it to be revealed by their ‘rulers’ but the British media have been completely silent about this information and it is only the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet who have reported on this persons existence along with the Norwegian polices confirmation of his existence.

But we still do not know who he is and Breivik has claimed he had an English ‘mentor’ called ‘Richard the Lionheart' which fits in with who wrote or edited the “2083” manifesto in perfect English and why it is an integral piece of evidence to the whole case.

Along the way over the past 10 months waiting and trying to prove my innocence and that Ayling was behind this there have been several questions that I had to form the pieces of the puzzle in my mind.

One was how could Ayling be linked to Serbia and the Balkans and for months it was the biggest missing piece of the puzzle until it was revealed where he worked. As soon as I looked at the banks website I saw Serbia and the Balkans which was the missing link between Ayling and Serbians and confirmed to me without doubt that he was the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik.

The other question at the beginning of the case was why was the murder location of the MI6 agent Gareth Williams in Breivik’s manifesto.

A top code breakers murder location inside an embedded code inside a manifesto linked to the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century.

That is enough to raise suspicions.

Why would the murder location be in there if it is, other than those who were behind the murder placing it in there as a finger print?

This is all obviously speculation because nothing is definite.

So I believe Ayling is behind Breivik which would mean that he is also connected in someway to whoever killed Gareth Williams if that is why his murder location is in the manifesto.

It was said at the beginning of the Gareth Williams case that he was following Russian mafia money around Europe, and in the days preceding his murder there was a Russian diplomatic car seen in his street that was out of place.

The Russians are very open about killing people like with their nuclear terrorism in London; they do not hide from their actions so you could say a finger print in the Breivik case is befitting if it is the case.

This obviously made me question a possible link between Ayling and Russians. I did not think too much beyond surface thoughts because nothing was confirmed or proven so was just in the back of my mind.

Then yesterday when I read about Ayling’s bank it showed that his bank has been operating for many years in the former Soviet block and Russia which possibly confirms the Russian link if that is who had a hand in the murder of Gareth Williams and placed his murder location in the manifesto. It would also confirm the link between Breivik's paramilitary training in Belarus by a group run by a former Soviet Colonel and other Russians.

Nobody knows yet though.

I am sure that Ayling has Russian contacts through his banking day job considering the bank has operated in Russia and the former Soviet block for many years, and he is a known political activist who fantasises about murdering political and religious leaders so there is a correlation.

It would be interesting to know whether he is an agent or asset of the State?

William Hague the Foreign Secretary has closed down the Gareth Williams case citing it is in the interests of National Security which is the legal term for a Government minister ‘perverting the course of justice’ when there is an investigation into the murder of a British citizen who was working for the Security Services that ended up in his murder by someone who obviously saw him as a threat due to his work for Queen & Country.

What was his work and why prevent the British police from investigating this line of enquiry?

The missing link would be whether or not Ayling’s bank came up in any of Mr. William’s Echelon work following Russian money if that is what he was doing. This would then be the direct link and prove that whoever was behind his murder had a hand in ‘Operation Breivik’ and was directly linked to Ayling.

This is all obviously speculation but as part of Gareth Williams murder investigation it is a question that needs answering considering his murder location is quite possibly an embedded code location within Breivik’s manifesto, even if to just disprove it as a conspiracy theory.

William Hague has prevented this from happening though.

It is a historic fact in the world of international espionage that double agents recruited and working on behalf of foreign powers for financial and political gain murder loyal spies or reveal their identities to others for assassination because of their work, so this is not out of the realms of possibility and is a real question for the family as part of the investigation into the murder of their son and brother.

The ‘Powers’ that be have tried white washing Gareth Williams murder by trying to disprove it was murder and discrediting his reputation as if his untimely death was the result of a sex game that went wrong. I cannot see how placing yourself inside a small bag and locking it with no air is a sex game. The thing with this though is that the murder scene was completely wiped of finger prints and evidence meaning a 3rd party must have been there and involved at the time of his death.

Why wipe the place clean other than to destroy evidence and cover your tracks which means murder?

The bag Gareth Williams body was found in was a North Face bag.

Might just be a coincidence but what Country is facing the UK if you go North i.e North Face?

Ayling and his associates intimately involved in his political activities spanning the time frame of the EDL and Breivik’s countdown for his terrorist attacks are linked to the highest realms of the British Establishment which is obviously why Ayling’s friends identity has not been revealed yet.

What will it reveal when it is?

Time will tell as it is a question that needs answering!

p.s To save time Breivik should be offered a deal for his mother's immunity from prosecution and then everyone can see what is right and what is wrong and how it all fits together from Breivik's own mouth.

Shock horror...the Norwegian script writers do not want that though because how would that then make them look and the script they have been playing too?

But it is a situation that they cannot get out of which needs addressing one way or another in the interest of 'truth & justice' over the events of July 22nd 2011 in Norway.

Norwegian Prosecutors in denial

2012-05-20T18:50:00.007Z

Dagbladet: No weaknesses in the investigation

The Norwegian State Prosecutors have stated that the loose ends in their ‘official’ line of Breivik the “solo terrorist” who is connected to no one are insignificant and do not change their ‘official’ line.

The Norwegian State Prosecutors are nothing more than puppets on strings who are propagating the ‘official’ script that has been handed down to them from above.

They are the front-line ‘official’ face of the Norwegian State and case against Breivik and what else can they say?

Nothing because how would that look if they did?

They have no alternative now but to stick to their ‘official’ line and try to dismiss everything that contradicts it.

I in no way support Breivik or defend Breivik, not only because of what he did on July 22nd 2011 which was a crime against humanity but because he along with others attempted to frame me for the crimes he committed that could have resulted in a very long prison sentence for me. If the Norwegian State stick to their ‘official’ claim of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one then those behind him who crafted the script to frame me will not only get away with their actions towards me but also their complicity in the cold blooded murder of all those children of Utoya and that is not in the interests of ‘truth & justice’ which transcends politics.

What is your personal opinion about that?

The funny thing is, is that all of those unanswered questions that still linger in the case that they believe are insignificant actually change the whole story surrounding Breivik and completely contradicts their ‘official’ line.

Just like the second psychiatric report completely contradicts the first State sanctioned report.

The first report has more holes in it than a tea bag and was built around lies, half truths and statements from people complicit in Breivik’s crimes, and all leading psychiatric professionals dealing with Breivik on a daily basis also contradicted the first State sanctioned report.

To deny that report and its authority goes against the outcome the Norwegian ‘official’s want so even though it is completely flawed and has no basis to even be in the court room. They are still standing by it which is a joke in the eyes of anyone with any knowledge of law (or maybe it's me who is wrong).

That should tell you all you need to know and form a good basis with which to judge everything else upon.

The Norwegian State Prosecutors cannot now turn around and say they have been completely wrong with their ‘official’ line for the past 10 months and admit that there is a bigger story surrounding Breivik and other people’s involvement because how would that then look?

Not very good…Then the questions would come as to why and how.

Call it a National crisis because what would the Norwegian people think about being lied to over something of such gravity and magnitude by their Government and what would the future implications be?

Especially not now they are in the court room propagating their ‘official’ script in front of the Worlds media with not just the Norwegians following the events but the whole World now with their eyes on Norway because of the sickening nature of what Breivik did.

They have no alternative but to try and dismiss the loose ends and unanswered questions because the truth about them would completely contradict their ‘official’ script and create the crisis.

They are the ‘official’s who are conducting the enquiry so their ‘official’ line must be true is what most people would expect; only that is not the case here.

When those who make the law, break the law, in the name of the law, then there is no law.

There is either a Government cover-up of the truth, there has been a successful coup in Norway or the PST and Police with all of their experience, knowledge and resources might as well be a bunch of aliens from outer space living on earth with no understanding or concept of human life with which to draw an investigative conclusion from, that’s how bad it now looks in the eyes of those who have a grasp of the evidence (in my opinion anyway).

I personally will rule out the 3rd choice because I have met some of them and they seemed pretty normal to me.

The only conclusion with the ‘official’ script is that there is a high level Government cover-up of the truth or there has been a successful coup, there is no other alternative.

That is taboo to think and say though!

To now turn around and admit that they are wrong and Breivik is connected to a network who recruited him, brainwashed him, trained him, and financed him completely goes against the ‘official’ line which goes against the script writers from above.

This is just the simple fact of the matter now.

Makes you wonder how stupid or how desperate those script writers are to have thought that they could get away with their ‘official’ lies when all those young innocent children lay dead, where ‘truth & justice’ is the only recompense for their untimely murders.

Breivik cannot get out of his situation but why should those behind him who sent him to commit his acts get away with their actions?

Protected by the Norwegian State apparatus.

Don’t forget either that the ruling Government removed their protégé’s from Utoya before Breivik arrived to unleash his carnage against the innocent kids on the island that day without even attempting to secure the place just in case something did happen, which it did.

Very suspicious that they were removed and the rest left to their fate that day (in my mind anyway).

The Norwegian police have a detailed witness statement from me after a voluntary 3 days and 15 hours interview due to the fact that I was set up to be the alleged English ‘mentor’ Breivik speaks of in his manifesto.

All evidence now proves my hypothesis to be completely right only no action has been taken.

My hypothesis goes against their ‘official’ script.

Here is a short list of the unanswered questions that completely contradict the ‘official’ line and would change everything.

1.) Who is Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’?

The head of the British police said recently that MI6 are not above the law over the murder of Gareth Williams whose possible murder location turned up in Breivik’s manifesto.

That means that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is not above the law and he has already been interviewed about his possible role as the English ‘mentor’ so it will be very telling to see whether or not he revealed this persons identity in interview. If not why not?

All the British police have to do is arrest and interrogate Ann Marchini and Kinana to prove this persons existence.

Has this happened yet? If not why not if no one is above the law?

Breivik said his English ‘mentor’ was called ‘Richard the Lionheart’ so this question is integral to the whole case.

Why has this person not been traced and revealed to the public yet?

2.) The Norwegian State Prosecutors claim that Breivik was a complete failure and high school drop out, so how did he write a 1500 page manifesto in perfect English that no high school drop out would ever be able to accomplish, especially a Norwegian one?

This means someone else wrote the manifesto, or at least edited it for him which by default means someone else is directly linked to him that can only be his real English ‘mentor’ seen as though its written in perfect English.

3.) The Norwegian police have still not had access to Breivik’s Facebook accounts to prove or disprove Breivik’s claim of them possibly finding a link to the network/group he says he is connected to.

Completely flawed ‘official’ line until they are checked.

4.) Did Breivik really make $600,000 from fake diplomas online or was this the financing of international terrorism from external sources. Living in the computer age and Breivik claiming it was an online operation then there will be an electronic trail.

5.) Where did Breivik learn his bomb making skills?

Or are we to believe he created his bomb that was successful first go that destroyed his Government building and killed 8 people from an online internet recipe?

6.) Did Breivik attend paramilitary training camps in Belarus as has been stated from sources inside the Country?

This would explain where he learned his bomb making skills and mean he is part of a network.

7.) Did Breivik meet a Serbian war criminal in Liberia?

8.) Has Breivik been offered a deal for his innocent mother’s immunity from prosecution?

That one question would solve everything in an instant.

There are other unanswered questions that need answering that are a little more complex these are just the easiest to ask off of the top of my head.

I pretty much know the answer to each of these questions in my own mind and it tells a completely different story than the ‘official’ story the Norwegian State script writers have written for the Breivik case.

I only have my reputation to defend in all of this because there is no way I want on my conscience or reputation in the eyes of others that I was behind Breivik. The families of the dead have the memory of their loved ones to think about.

As I said, this transcends politics when a bunch of innocent kids were butchered and maimed for life on a summer camp in the name of politics, and those behind it should be held to account in the eyes of the law which is Democracy in action.

We live in the 21st Century not the Middle Ages where Western societies are supposed to be civilised and a State sanctioned cover-up of the massacre of a group of innocent young kids on their summer camp is in no way civilised.

It means the Governers view the governed with contempt and scorn, acting without any moral obligation to those they are supposed to be serving and as one of the governed I take offence to that, especially when all those innocent children lay dead and their grieving families have lost the ones they love never to experience that human love again and someone (plural) attempted to blame me for it.

How dare they!

It’s about time other people with a ‘voice’ in Norway started asking these questions and challenging the ‘official’ line, unless they have all been brainwashed to believe the lies they are being told as truth and believe the ‘official’ line.

The one question I have been waiting for that has still not arrived in 6 months is; who is Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’?

This will answer everything and is the reason why it has not been revealed because it would shatter the Norwegian State sanctioned script.

How much longer till the bigger script writers intervene with the truth for the sake of justice for all those who are now dead.

These questions cannot be ignored, especially the ‘Richard the Lionheart’ one because it is integral to the whole case and is the reason why I ended up in the middle of the case in the first place, and it is not that hard to find out even though those who hold the information are surrounded with high raking people from within the British Establishment.

In my opinion if it is found out that the Norwegian Government have carried out a State sanctioned cover-up then the King of Norway should enact whatever law he can within his Kingdom and dissolve his Government and hold independent elections just like with the Arab spring we are supporting around the World as our efforts to spread Democracy in other Countries.

History recounts times like these and today is no different when looking back in 100 or more years.

When you look at the facts, who wants to be governed by political rulers who can carry out such things against the people they are supposed to be serving.

If they can do this then they can do anything with the contempt that they have for the people.

What will the Norwegian people think about their Government when they find out they have been lied to with a State sanctioned cover up of the truth behind Breivik for whatever reasons it has been carried out.

The only question now is whether or not the media powers are going to allow the Norwegian people to know and hear the truth that challenges the 'official' line.

Or whether at the 12th hour the ‘Powers’ that be in Norway who have been writing the Breivik script now do a complete U-turn in the case and admit they have been wrong all along, publicly apologise for their mistakes and tell the public the truth behind Breivik and hold others to account, namely his real English ‘mentor’.

That is ‘truth & justice’ and confirms the bigger conspiracy involving other people that is being hidden from view for reasons unknown yet other than the fact that they are standing in positions where they think they are untouchable.

Breivik was not a fly by night hood from the streets unknown to anyone within the Norwegian establishment; he comes from the political military class in Norway with his father a foreign diplomat and his step father an Army Major, and he carried out what he called a coup de tat in the name of politics.

But the ‘Powers’ that be in Norway controlling the State script want the world to believe Breivik was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one and if they can secure the insane label then it all fits together nicely for mass public consumption with the real source behind Breivik getting away with their actions along with their reasons.

Breivik was specifically recruited for his role because of his family background that’s just blatantly obvious to anyone with a brain when put into context with all of the other evidence. Only the Norwegian PST & Police script writers seem not to think so and have written a completely contradictory script that makes them look like actors from a Monty Python sketch only it’s not funny in the slightest when they are supposed to be professionals serving the public in Norway.

When those who make the law break the law in the name of the law then there is no law.

Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one

2012-05-19T12:29:00.002Z

Norway's PST & Police from the VERY beginning have stated that Breivik the son of the former Government diplomat to the UK and step son of an Army Major was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one.

Even though he traveled the world extensively over the 10 year period he claims he was first recruited, and had Facebook accounts with up to 8,000 like-minded friends. The Norwegian police have still not had access to his old accounts even though they make official statements, with Breivik himself saying they will find a link in the accounts.

This 'official' line has not changed from day one with the attempt to reinforce this claim in the eyes of the public by certifying him as 'insane' through the first psyche report which worked well for public perceptions for 7 months until the second report was carried out that conflicted with the first report.

That is one point of contention that is now playing out in the court room.

There are many unanswered questions in the case which should mean that no 'official' statement should be made until they have been thoroughly investigated and proven or dissproven but that has not happened with the 'official's' making their 'official' statements about the case.

The only conclusion is that there is a Government cover-up of the truth with their "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is insane label, who was radicalised, recruited, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mothers home.

The son of a Government diplomat and step son or an Army Major carried out the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century and called it a coup de tat and dressed it up in Freemasonary and Templar clothes which you can be sure his family ties are both a part of which is why Breivik was recruited.

War within the Norwegian fraternity...at the cost of 69 kids slaughtered with many more injured and a subsequent high level Government cover-up.

The 'Powers' that be want the world to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one.

Why?

The families of the dead should be asking these questions as they have the 'voices' to be heard unless they believe the 'official' line they are being told.

The above graph gives a simple outline of some unanswered questions that need answering and if they are not answered then you can draw your own conclusions.

The most important piece of information to me and the wider case is who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is? This I am sure would answer a lot of questions with much falling into place when he is known, only there is a refusal to reveal this persons identity.

Why?

The British Police should know who he is and located him by now, so why has his identity not been revealed?

This piece of information is an act of God in the whole case because He knew what was coming so revealed the information and links because He is the Almighty, the Alpha and Omega who knows all things and reveals all things to His people.

Breivik's mother is a co-conspirator to her sons crimes so Breivik should be offered a deal for her immunity or she should be charged for her crimes but this has not happened.

Why?

There is talk of Breivik being paramilitary trained in Belarus, which would explain how he was able to build a bomb covertly on his farm that was capable of blowing up his Government building.

Further reading: Unraveling Breiviks Belarus connection

The group who it is said trained Breivik are linked to Russian money which might explain why the murder scene of Gareth Williams the murdered MI6 agent ended up inside the manifesto because at the beginning stages of his murder enquiry there was talk of him working as part of Echelon tracing the Russin mafia's money into Europe.

The banking angle of the enquiry brings Alan Lake into the equation because he works inside the prestigious European Bank for Reconstruction & Development that is directly linked to Serbia and the Balkans. He is also business partners with people working in other prestigious banks and high ranking people in British society.

We all know the Russian infiltration of British high society.

Breivik transferred money to Liberia through a bank that sounds like a smaller branch of Lake's bigger bank.

All evidence clearly points to the fact that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is Breivik's English 'mentor' but no action has been taken against him.

Why?

Their agenda was to frame me for Breivik as being the man behind him who inspired him on the internet as part of his psychosis in his bedroom, only that did not go to plan. If it had of gone to plan then nobody would be asking these questions with the media satisfied with the 'official' line, and I would have been smeared much more than I was as the alleged English 'mentor' all over the world news and would be looking at a lengthy prison sentence with those who set this up having a nice clean cover story for the media.

Thank God I stood accused at the beginning because people are listening to my point of view and nobody should get away with massacring a bunch of innocent unarmed kids in the name of politics, and that includes all those people intricately involved with Breivik and his crimes.

It's about time some answers were given to these unanswered questions and the trail leading to those script writers at the top in Norway who are complicit in the high level sanctioned cover-up were revealed so they can be held to account for their actions against the Norwegian people.

This goes beyond politics to basic humanity we all have irrespective of our political or religious beliefs.

The blood of the children of Utoya demands it, and I am sure the general public would agree with that point when those in 'Power' abuse that power they have been 'gifted', against those on whose behalf they are supposed to be serving.

unless we are all expendable cattle in the eyes of our masters?

You decide on that point...

It would not surprise me if Breivik is knocked off soon because he is the only one who can reveal the identity of those people behind him and their agenda because he holds the knowledge in his mind. This is why his sanity should be tested to see whether or not his mothers liberty means more to him than the identity of his accomplices.

Breivik's prison transport was involved in a collision on the way to court the other day which makes you wonder whether or not that was a dry run to test the security. I am sure there are many high ranking people who want him dead now because he threatens their safety and liberty, and they have the 'Power' to act against him dependent upon how safe he is in custody from them.

Time will tell...

He was their sacrificial pawn, but at this moment in time he has changed the game and is now more powerful than all of those directly connected to him, who placed him where he know sits.

I reckon he would offer them up for his mother and the path of redemption before the Lord because I do not believe he is insane and he has had a lot of time to think about everything. It's just if someone gets to him first to remove the threat to themselves.

The head of the police in Britain should reveal who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is due to the fact it is the British angle of the case and nobody in Government should be allowed to prevent it, and anyone in Government who attempts to prevent it should be held to account for 'perverting the course of justice'. This is just the fact of the matter now that there is no way round, and anyone following the case will want to know this persons identity and why it has not been revealed yet. Look at what happened to me at the beginning!

As has been said recently, MI6 are not above the law.

In Norway the head of the PST or Police should offer Breivik the deal for his mothers immunity from prosecution and then see how the script those script writers wrote looks in light of the evidence from Breivik himself. I am sure many dots will be able to be joined that will expose the script writers and call their integrity into question.

Jesus is Lord over the whole Earth and all powers are subject to Him so it is only a matter of time until the truth is pulled out into the light, so those bigger script writers should start thinking about how to write the truth about this case to the general public.

Some more questions for Norway's PST and Police

2012-05-17T16:47:00.005Z

Seems there is a bit more steam left in the tank.

VG: Norway's PST's report on Knights Templar network

Quote: Behring Anders Breivik (33) claims "Knights Templar" made a full background check before being included. Police do not believe it.

In an analysis report says the police that if the Knights Templar are - and have the resources Breivik outlines - they would probably not chosen him. "If the founders of the Knights Templar carried out investigations of Breivik in 2002, they would have found that he had no sodium, the he had not been in the military, that he had worked as a telemarketer for six years, he had started three companies, all with deficit, and that had been taken by police for graffiti and driving while intoxicated, "the report said. breivik claims Knights Templar emphasized the extremely gifted individuals when they recruited people. Police believe it rhymes well with Breivik's CV at the time.

Breivik was not recruited by the historical Order of Knights Templar, he was recruited by a political group of right wingers as part of a neo-Gladio style network.

They have wrapped up Breivik and his/their political agenda against Left-wing Marxists in the clothes of Templarism in an attempt to gain wider support because the old style neo-nazi ideology would never be acceptable to mainstream right wing politics.

Breivik admits himself that he is a part of the Gladio network that has been around since the Second World War and carried out more than 50 terrorist attacks in that time span.

The people who recruited Breivik were not looking for someone with the ability to make money through business or someone with an upstanding reputation like the Norwegian police think they were. They were looking for someone who they could trust, and considering Breivik's family background that they had access to because they are part of the intelligence community he came to the top of the list.

Father was a diplomat to the UK so there is the connection to the London Gladio grouping, and his step father was a former Army Major.

Breivik came from the right family stock in the eyes of others...He could be trusted because he had a lot to live up to with the right brainwashing.

The people behind Breivik have all the money they need, look at the links into international banks, so Breivik was not recruited for his business skills, although he raised $600,000 from somewhere so he could not have been that stupid unless it was the financing of international terrorism from external sources.

Quote: Progress was to recognize Kosovo as an independent state, and supported the NATO bombing of Serbia. According to Breivik's explanation was bombing one of the main reasons why the Knights Templar was re-established in 2002.

This brings in the Serbian angle to the neo-Gladio network and the reason why a small European group with a larger supporting group came together with a mutual political agenda, with Breivik recruited as an integral part of that agenda that resulted in July 22nd 2011.

That means there are other Breivik’s out there as part of the same network.

The group is not a Knights Templar group in the real sense of the Order, they are a group of politically minded people dressing themselves up in the clothes of the Knights Templar (in my opinion).

They are a neo-Gladio group which is extreme right/left politics formed to influence the political debate through terrorism in whatever Countries they are operating in.

Wikipedia: Operation Gladio

Quote: Brevik has changed the explanation from the Knights Templar was a pan-European organization with at least 25 -30 members to be a network consisting of six persons.

It does not take 25 – 30 members to create Breivik and the aftermath which is laid down in the “2083” manifesto and accompanying video. All it takes is a small group with wider political support. They want to start a terrorist campaign along the same lines as Al Qaeda with real solo terrorists rising up and committing right-wing political terrorist acts.

It only took a small group to create the English Defence League with Alan Lake who I believe is Breivik’s real English ‘mentor’ involved, so numbers are irrelevant. Someone’s actions and the right propaganda exactly like ‘Operation Breivik’ can create a much larger movement than the original fewwho started it which is exactly what ‘Operation Breivik’ is all about when you look at the whole thing.

The 25 – 30 claim was Breivik’s pompous claims to bolster the image of ‘his’ attempt to create a much larger organisation in the eyes of others, but under intense questioning the truth was revealed and that in reality it is really a small group of intelligent individuals which is in-line with being a neo-Gladio group where secrecy is paramount so small cells of politically/financially influential people are essential for secrecy, with Breivik being a part of the cell operating out of London.

Who helped create the picture perfect English “2083” manifesto is Breivik is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one?

Quote: Breivik had economic motives for their trips to Liberia, Lithuania and Estonia. At the same time it can not be refuted that Breivik may have met a Serb in Liberia, three people in London in 2002 and people in Lithuania and Estonia in 2004. police are clear in their report that they have no faith in the organization Breivik talking about are .

People are leaving Lithuania and Estonia for greener European pastures because of the economic situation in those Countries so why would Breivik's trips there be for economic reasons?

That does not add up.

You have to look at all the historical evidence in light of the events of July 22nd and the PST’s conclusion does not sit right in the scheme of things but that is their logic because they have a script they are working with that was created by someone (plural) and involved me only my part did not go to plan (explained later).

Just because they say they do not believe something is true does not mean it is not true, it just means they have no evidence either way to confirm or deny so the statement should be they are keeping an open mind until all evidence is gathered to see how it fits together or doesn’t fit together.

It fits together for me when looking at the evidence: Breivik’s bomb making skills

Further reading: Breivik’s Liberia London connection

Further reading: Some questions for the prosecution

Quote: "Since the terrorist attack on 22 July saw the police main goal was to uncover whether there are assistants to Breivik and cell 2 or 3 exists. As of 9 april, there is no information indicating that "

Further reading: A Question of doubt

Have the 3 points covered in this post been completely and thoroughly ruled out, meaning there is evidence to the contrary or are they open ended points with no firm conclusion other than the PST or Police saying they do not believe there are others involved even without evidence to state that as a fact?

Quote:"Police Security Service since July 22 priority to work with the possibility that Breivik has held an organizational affiliation and that the Knights Templar is an international organization. PST has found that the Knights Templar exist in the form Breivik says

It is not a Knights Templar Order it is a neo-Gladio style group dressed up in the clothes of Templarism.

The script for Breivik was written from the very beginning and that script has been to have Breivik labelled as a "solo terrorist" linked to no one who is insane and was radicalised, recruited, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mothers home because beyond that script there are people in high places hiding from the truth.

Based upon all of the evidence that script is in tatters and whoever wrote it should be held to account because they are complicit in a cover-up of the truth when there are 77 people now dead, with 69 of them innocent kids on their summer camp, with many more injured for life because of Breivik's actions as part of a planned coup de tat.

Nice how the leader and deputy leader were removed before Breivik arrived on Utoya island don’t you think?

They almost got away with it with me being arrested and locked up as his inspiration which would have made it a nice clean story only I have been allowed to defend myself and show my truth to those who want to read it.

I was their fall guy for a nice clean media story which if you look back to the beginning you will see very clearly in the media where the journalists tried to fit me into the box written for me in the Breivik script with their smears, lies and half truths...Only I never fell because Jesus Christ is holding my arms and feet and I stand on truth in righteousness in this and have done since the beginning.

Now let others judge what is truth and what is falsehood as people look for the truth behind Breivik.

Quote: You have made a conclusion based on that since you have not arrested anyone else, or located on other so can not Knights Templar exist. If you use that logic, it existed still does not know prior to 22 July, he pointed out already during the first week of the trial.

Further reading: Norwegian Police logic

If the Norwegian Police or PST really want to get to the bottom of the truth then they should offer Breivik's mother a deal for her immunity from prosecution for laundering $600,000 through her bank accounts for her son then they can start joining some of the dots together. It is said that the money was from Breivik selling fake diploma's but my money is on it being for the financing of international terrorism from external sources. Either way there is no way out because it is the proceeds of crime which is a criminal offence so the Norwegian people will expect her to be arrested.

She has been given protection by the State up to this point in time, protection not afforded to the children of Utoya on July 22nd 2011 who are now dead or injured.

If Breivik does a deal for his mothers immunity it is going to shatter that State script that has been written for the public which is probably why no action has been taken against her up to this point in time.

They should also reveal who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is and see how this fits into the picture seen as though its integral to the investigation.

I wonder how things are going to look when these 2 points are addressed?

A question for Norway's PST & Police

2012-05-17T08:53:00.008Z

Who taught Breivik how to construct a bomb capable of destroying his Government building which killed 8 people in the process?

Or do you want the public to believe Breivik constructed it from an internet recipe on his farm and it worked perfectly first go?

If someone taught him how to construct the bomb at another location then he is connected to a network and part of that network wrote me into their script that the 'Powers that be' are refusing to admit exists.

I am quite sure that not all the PST or Police working on the case believe what is being handed down to the media as fact in this case, because if they did it would mean they are all as stupid and ignorant as each other and that is not the case. Those at the very top are controlling the script and what is fed to the public as fact so as to create the perception they want in the public eye, for their own reasons.

That is called a Dictatorship and not a Democracy, unless its been a well planned successful coup only there are now many unanswered questions that conflict with their 'official' line.

Breivik the son of a former Norwegian Government diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major. If that does not raise suspicions in your mind in the scheme of things then nothing will.

Also the banking area of investigation and how that links in with Alan Lake.

Further reading: Breivik's bomb

Further reading: Alan lake some food for thought

Norwegian PST & Police cannot confirm or deny Breivik's network

2012-05-16T13:00:00.005Z

Dagbladet: Police & PST conclusion

10 months on and the Norwegian PST & Police cannot confirm or deny the existence of any network/group linked to Breivik.

That is a big turn around from Breivik the "solo terrorist" linked to no one and leaves the door open on other avenues of investigation that could result in the truth being known and accomplices being arrested.

Breivik claims he has an English 'mentor' called 'Richard the Lionheart' and due to this and other pointers placed inside the manifesto including the Knights Templar regalia I stood accused at the beginning of being that man.

When I realised what was happening and that I was being set up as a fall guy for the day after July 22nd 2001 to deflect all blame and attention from the real source of the terrorist attack I stated Alan Lake the director behind the EDL was where this originated from because he had reason and motive to remove me from being a threat to his European groups political agenda.

10 months on all evidence now points to my belief being 100% correct only there has been no thorough investigation due to his links with high ranking figures who would be covered in "mud" if it was found to be true that he is behind Breivik.

I know he is, and I am sure the Security Services know too!

By an act of God over 3 years ago I received an email from one of Lake's close associates Kinana regarding a meeting that had taken place in Lake's flat where a man who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' online was present. Why is this mans identity being withheld from the public considering it is a critical piece of information and could lead to the eventual uncovering of the truth behind Breivik?

Ann Marchini who is linked to Christine Brim in America and all of her associates knows this persons identity and some of those associates will answer to the Lord Jesus Christ about this when their time comes if they do not do what is right before God in this instance when a Christian brother sits accused falsely and they have the power to act. Also Ann Marchini withholding this information means she would be perverting the course of justice which is a very serious crime in the context of the severity of the case.

It is about time this persons identity was revealed so that we can see where the track leads.

Anyone who believes Breivik the "solo terrorist" official line needs their head checking.

Breivik is the son of the former Government diplomat to London and step son of a former Army Major. He claims he is a part of the Gladio network with his words and deeds being in line with Gladio ideology, so its safe to assume that he is telling the truth about this, which then means his network/group are also members of the larger old school Gladio movement or a new neo-Gladio style group.

The son of a former Government diplomat and Army Major commits his terrorist attacks against his ruling Government and claims it is a coup de tat.

But the Norwegian State Prosecutors claim Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one.

Somebody somewhere does not want the full truth to be known for some reason. They want the general public to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mothers home whilst playing war games on his XBox.

That is the 'official' Norwegian Government line...

I think the only professionals who agree with that line are the 2 psychiatrists who wrote the first report on Breivik. Their report has more holes in it than a tea bag and should not even be in the courts proceedings now we know that certain points it was based around were false, misleading or criminal in nature when looked at in context. Their professional credibility hinges on that report and they are in the court room on behalf of the State so have no way out other than to just hope that things go in their favour through the trial with the Prosecutors on their side because they are fighting for the same team.

Believe me that is false hope because 'truth & justice' will always prevail if there are righteous and just men and women willing to fight for it because God is on their side, and that official line is in no way in the interests of 'truth & justice' as has been proven beyond doubt, so it is only a matter of time.

The Norwegian State Prosecutors do not believe Breivik met anyone whilst on his extensive international travels that spanned several continents and many European destinations.

1 question; Where did Breivik learn his bomb making skills capable of blowing up his Government building then?

That one question shatters the "solo terrorist" illusion, then you have to question why is their an attempted 'official' cover-up of the truth and who is behind it?

Son of a Government diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major carries out what he calls a coup de tat after being recruited into a secretive group in London in 2002.

It doesn't take Einstein to see the picture and know there is something much more serious and sinister at play, and elements within this grouping attempted to set me up as their fall guy for a nice clean media story to cover the real truth behind Breivik.

That did not happen and now they are covering up and hiding the truth from the public.

What I find strange is how the Leader and Deputy Leader of the Labour Youth were removed off the island when Breivik was on route to carry out his massacre.

The innocent kids who you could say were expendable in the eyes of their political masters were then left trapped on the island with no increase in security, with what happened next now being a dark stain in our history.

Remember that when you see them preaching their politics and using the events of July 22nd 2011 for political gains. Their protege's are safe and sound because they were removed to safety before the carnage began.

Just because the 'officials' say something is true does not mean it is true all the time, they use this false belief the public have in them to cover up their misdeeds and the public believe what they are told because the 'official's' do not lie is what the public think. That is until it is proven that they have lied or been lying and then they have to answer to the public and the police, which is what has happened on many occasions in the UK recently.

The 'official's' use the mainstream media as their propaganda weapons against the public because 9 times out of 10 the media reports exactly what they are told from the 'official's' as if it is fact which is then presented to the public as fact even if it is a lie. Officials don't lie so it must be true is people's attitudes, and then the story the 'officials' want the public to believe is the story presented to and through the media.

This Breivik case is a prime example in Norway of a State sanctioned cover up of the truth.

I have followed this case for 10 months and would stand on my truth in front of anyone, with my truth conflicting with the 'official' Norwegian State Prosecutors so called truth.

I was set up and I want the truth to be known and those behind it held to account on an official basis because they are not more equal than others...Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one is not truth, its falsehood as part of a Norwegian Government cover-up.

EDL's "Tommy" grooming underage girls

2012-05-16T12:56:00.001Z

EDL News: EDL leader outed

Further reading: EDL Noncegate affair

Fjordman is a Fraudman

2012-05-15T12:05:00.005Z

Peder Jensen aka Fraudman formerly Fjordman has refused to attend as a witness in the Breivik trial.

His words inspired the mass murderer who named his "2083" manifesto after one of his own essays, and he does not have the bottle to stand by his words and defend them in a court of law when 77 of his fellow Norwegians now lay dead.

The man who said I am a dog who barks and doesn't bite to the Aftenposten journalist which was not very nice or befitting in the scheme of things and implies very serious undertones.

Massacring a bunch of innocent misguided kids trapped on an island is definitely not my form of barking anyway, and someone still has the keys.

For some reason he hid from the world in 2005 and wrote anonymously under his former alias Fjordman and has helped inspire part of the ideological "Cultural Conservative" European movement that resulted in Anders Breivik.

Why do you think he has been renamed "Fraudman"?

Dagbladet: Fraudman refuses to testify

2012-05-13T16:40:00.005Z

I thought I would leave my final thoughts here.

At the beginning of being accused of being Breivik's English 'mentor' I saw where this came from and the reason why it came my way and I stated Alan Lake was the source of this.

9 months on and all evidence points to the fact that my first claim was right, although no action has been taken against him even though there are critical questions that need answering as part of the whole enquiry.

I can only say this was God's grace and divine intervention because He knew what was ahead, and knew I would be more than willing to stand in the gap: 'Richard the Lionheart'

The Norwegian State prosecutors claim that Breivik is a "solo terrorist" linked to no one even in the face of a catalogue of unanswered questions that completely contradicts their 'official' claim.

No one seems to want to challenge that 'official' claim even in the face of the evidence, and that includes all those families who lost loved ones in Norway on July 22nd 2011, or they are being silenced from challenging the 'official' script by the media.

There are obviously people in 'high places' who do not want the full truth about Breivik to be known because of how bad it would look in the eyes of the public.

Further reading: Successful coup or Government coverup

Refusal to investigate and interrogate Alan Lake can only mean that whoever is dictating the Breivik case and the subsequent 'official' script fed to the public knows all about Lake and his link to Breivik that stems back over 10 years.

I know for a fact that I am right and all evidence now proves that point to be correct yet no action has been taken which can only mean complicity between people in the UK and Norway. Breivik the extreme right-wing terrorist who claimed to be carrying out a coup de tat is the son of the former Norwegian diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major, so its pretty obvious that 'Operation Breivik' was a long time in the planning between 'people' in the UK and Norway with Breivik specifically chosen for his future task and role. It is these same 'people' who are now using their positions of influence to hide from the truth.

Who is controlling the Norwegian script being fed to the public in Norway?

Why else has Lake not been fully investigated with all the questions surrounding him answered and the general public made aware of this?

Does not the memory of those 69 kids murdered on Utoya island deserve it, or the 8 murdered in the Government quarter of Oslo, or all the kids left permanently physically and mentally scared from the events that day?

Why has Breivik not been offered a deal for his mothers immunity from prosecution?

Funny how on the day of the attacks after the Government building was blown up, the head of the youth wing (tipped to be future leader of the Labour party) who was on Utoya island at the time of the attacks was moved off the island to a place of safety before Breivik arrived to start his murdering. The security surrounding the island was not stepped up after the bombing, just the future leader moved off the island before Breivik arrived with the rest of the young kids on their political camp being left to their fate that day, trapped on a little island with a rampaging cowardly murderer hunting them down in the name of right-wing politics as part of a planned coup de tat.

Nice of the Norwegian Labour party to remove their protege from the island just in time don't you think.

Something smells fishy about that one...

In my mind I just wonder how the mainstream media are ever going to change the script they have been writing to their readerships in relation to Alan Lake and his involvement with Breivik. How are they going to now turn around and say that Alan Lake is the real English 'mentor' behind Breivik, or how are the Norwegian State prosecutors going to turn around and admit they were wrong and that Alan Lake is Breivik's real English 'mentor'.

Who controls the media?

If you answer all of the questions I have posed here on this blog over the past few months then you will come to the conclusion that Alan Lake is the real English 'mentor' behind Breivik so the above questions about the media and Norwegian prosecutors are very relevant, and my explanations cannot be ignored because it all fits into place and makes sense and there are people out there who want to know the truth which includes families of the dead from Norway.

I have done more than enough to prove that the accusations against me were false!

Everything has an explanation, its just whether or not some 'people' want the truth to be known or not and what price they are willing to pay to shield it from the public.

At least I can say I did my best for the memory of those innocent Norwegian kids whose murders I stood accused of being complicit in. This blog and my personal witness over the case is my testimony before God and man, then let others judge and decide for themselves what is truth and what is falsehood.

I have done all I can do now...the rest is in God's hands.

Dagbladet: First Norwegian interview

2012-05-10T12:39:00.002Z

Maybe not quite finished.

2012-05-10T12:16:00.005Z

Further reading: More unanswered questions

Dagbladet reported yesterday that the Police investigators still have unanswered questions in the enquiry, one of them is the mystery surrounding the 46 map co-ordinates in the manifesto.

First off, if there are unanswered questions then how can the Norwegian State prosecutors claim in a court of law in front of the Worlds media that Breivik is not connected to anyone?

It now seriously conflicts with the script they were handed down and took into the court room in front of the general public.

Quote: Breivik told police that one needs a special code maps to solve it. The places that GPS coordinates are pointing to, as they appear in the compendium is not necessarily the same place they will lead to if one has a code sheet to correct each coordinate, says defender Mostly Grounded Dagbladet.

Of the 46 map points are two of them in Oslo. One of them is just a hundred meters away from the Parliament and the Masonic Lodge, where Breivik was a member. The other is located in Skipper Street, just a short walk from Oslo Central Station, the Opera and Dagbladet's premises.

In my personal opinion Breivik did not put the map co-ordinates inside the manifesto just like he did not edit the manifesto itself, creating a picture perfect English compendium.

Someone else did that, just like the wording for the “2083” video that did not come from Breivik either. That came from someone who had a grasp of the much bigger picture, and you can tell/feel through the words.

This then means someone else added to the “2083” manifesto which then means Breivik is not a “solo terrorist” linked to no one. Just like Breivik must have had help with his bomb making skills meaning someone trained him, and someone made the connection for him, thus he is not a “solo terrorist” linked to no one that the Norwegian State prosecutors want the world to believe.

For some reason.

Breivik is not impartial to lying as has been proven, so him claiming there is a special code map to decipher the co-ordinates in my opinion is rubbish.

There are enough relevant codes in the actual 46 co-ordinates so to say you need a special code map does not sit right in the scheme of things, and why 46 codes to lead to 46 different locations.

Breivik mentioned Luton in trial and a map co-ordinate for Luton is in the manifesto. The co-ordinates to the Parliament and his Masonic Lodge appeared too, so why would the co-ordinates mean anything other than what they appear as, when they appear as actual relevant locations?

The murder scene of the top MI6 code breaker is also a stones throw from one of the code’s locations, so you determine whether that is suspicious enough to warrant further investigation.

The Norwegian police investigators believe that Breivik’s trip to Liberia was part of a Nigerian money scam, or for blood diamonds.

So which one is it?

How does a Nigerian money scam end up in Liberia at the height of the civil war in the Country?

Further reading: The Liberia London connection

Quote: Breivik transferred a total of $ 5,000 to a Liberian contact. All traces of Breivik's money transfer stops in Libe Polish Bank for Development and Investment (LBDI).

Not being funny but the name of that bank now intricately linked to the Norwegian police investigation sounds like a smaller branch of the bigger prestigious bank that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake works for: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development

Are the 2 banks connected in anyway whatsoever?

The money trail…and another link on top of all the other links.

What is the domino effect with Ayling/Lake?

Quote: Police have found that Breivik laundered millions, including the Baltic banks. He also claimed that he met with extreme nationalists there. The police have not been confirmed. Breivik's unwillingness to give evidence about other people has hampered the investigation.

Breivik the international jet-setting terrorist who committed the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century who was 10 years in the making had travelled extensively through the Baltic States and laundered millions of kroners which has been confirmed by the Norwegian police.

But the Norwegian State prosecutors want the world to believe Breivik is a “solo terrorist” linked to no one which is laughable only it is not funny!

What do you think based upon just that one piece of evidence?

They pulled me up into the article again under the English ‘mentor’ role which I have proven is not me and given the reasons why I was framed for the role, and who the real English ‘mentor’ is and given the reasons why I was set up.

One thing I will say, is that the Norwegian newspapers can keep regurgitating old libelous news about me, but if they want to know the truth then they should be questioning in their public format, why Breivik’s mother has not been charged for conspiracy after laundering the financing of international terrorism for her son that resulted in July 22nd 2011? Then he can be offered a deal for his mothers immunity in return for him giving up his real English ‘mentor’.

It’s not rocket science, it stops the unfounded accusations and gets the truth out there for those who want it and are searching for it…And I am quite sure any international observers following my thoughts and opinions over this case I have been dragged into would agree with this one very clear point that needs addressing.

So shut up about me until you ask that real questions about this case!

With regards to the Gareth Williams murder case, the head of the police Bernard Hogan-Howe has said that MI6 are not above the law and that they will be DNA tested to see if there is a match that can be found from the hand towel found at the scene.

William Hague the Foreign Secretary has closed the case down under the official “Secrets Act” in the interest of “National Security”. How can getting to the bottom of who murdered an MI6 agent not be in the interest of “National Security”? If there are double agents, or rogue operators killing British MI6 agents in the course of their work for Queen & Country is it not in the interest of “National Security” to find them?

William Hague thinks not…

It will all come falling down in the end you will see.

They say Gareth Williams was working on a virus against Iran’s nuclear programme, but Israel are already on that one, and Mr. Williams was a codebreaker and maths genius not a computer programmer.

Another false trail just like his sex life, so that the truth can be shielded from the public and people in positions of power protected from their misdeeds.

Bernard Hogan-Howe should find out if Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is an MI6 agent or asset because that would explain a lot. Check to see if the banks he worked for ever came up in the course of Gareth Williams work whilst working for Echelon.

A dirty little unit set up for dirty politics, in the name of British intelligence which goes against the principles of the standards within the Queens realm when 69 innocent kids lay dead and many more butchered and maimed in the name of their right-wing politics in Norway.

Others know the answer to the questions, and they are pivotal questions to the Breivik case, and Mr. Williams case now, even if it is to disprove the ‘conspiracy theory’ of his murder scene turning up in Breivik’s manifesto. Or on the other hand prove the links.

Is Alan Lake an asset or agent of the State?

Surely he cannot be above the law?

A good friend said this quote to me recently which is quite fitting: "If those who make the law break the law in the name of the law then there is no law."

So what is it “Dave”.

So let’s see if “truth and justice” prevails against Alan Ayling in the “Mother of all Democracies” and there is a catalogue of unanswered questions surrounding Ayling/Lake and his direct involvement to the Breivik case, so time will tell whether or not Democracy is alive in Britian or whether its failed and we live under different conditions within society dependent upon our social standing and political position.

But remember that before God we are all born to die and nobody can escape that, it’s just when where and how.

2012-05-08T09:27:00.000Z

Game over now, I’ve run my race with this Breivik case and proven beyond doubt that it has nothing to do with me, other than others dressing up their right-wing political agenda in similar ideological clothes so as to ‘frame’ me for their crimes so as to remove me from being a threat to their continued agenda, and I have given enough evidence of where the real source of ‘Operation Breivik’ lays.

Only nobody seems willing to pursue the truth in the interest of justice.

Time will tell now though…

I’m done, and have no laptop now to continue even though there is more that can be said, but I have probably said enough.

I will not be picking up emails, so if anyone wants to contact me you have my phone number.

2012-05-07T08:18:00.000Z

A successful coup in Norway or a Marxist Dictatorship?

2012-05-06T11:31:00.006Z

It is in the news that the Chief investigating officer in the case of the murdered MI6 officer Gareth Williams is to be removed and replaced with a fresh ‘set of eyes’ due to the way the case has been handled and all of the unexplained questions that have not been answered by the lead investigators in the case. Inside Breivik’s manifesto there is a code with embedded map co-ordinates and one of those co-ordinates is a stone’s throw from where Mr. Williams was murdered so there is some overlapping here.

Further reading: The peculiar case of Gareth Williams

This is what happens in a Democracy when the truth is shielded from the public for whatever reason. The necessary Steps are taken to get to the bottom of the truth.

Sadly in Norway the same cannot be said at this present moment in time.

This can only mean one of 2 things. Either there was a successful coup from within the military intelligence infrastructure of the Country that will outwork itself over the coming years with a change of Government and a swing to the right-wing of politics, with the real truth behind Breivik being hidden from the public, or Norway is a European Marxist Dictatorship rather than a European Democracy and the Power of the State have closed the Breivik case down and attempted to white wash it for their own political gains and purposes.

I cannot see any other explanation when all things are considered.

The ‘official’ version of events just does not hold up as truth so the question is why? For what reason?

In the case of Gareth Williams there has been one man murdered and his family along with their support have been able to question the ‘official’ enquiry into his death and call into question all of the unanswered questions which has resulted in a change of investigators which is Democracy in action when ‘truth and justice’ must prevail.

In Norway there has been 77 people murdered by Breivik which includes 69 innocent kids on a summer camp as the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century, and there is a catalogue of unanswered questions that conflict with the ‘official’ line being propagated in court yet nobody in Norway has challenged this.

Is it taboo to challenge the ‘official’ version of events?

If one of my children was murdered by Breivik I would want to know the full truth and challenge all of the unanswered questions, yet it seems in Norway that the families of the dead are all happy with their Governments version of events.

Whether it’s a coup or not, the current Norwegian Government is still in place so it still has the ultimate authority and power over the case and the direction it takes so it rests solely at their feet.

The Governments ‘official’ line is that Breivik is a “solo terrorist” linked to no one, who was radicalised, recruited, trained and financed within the confines of his bedroom at his mother’s home whilst playing computer games and suffering from paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis. If you believe that when looking at the evidence then you might as well check yourself into a psychiatric ward.

They then took this script into the court room in-front of the Worlds media.

Each of those claims in the ‘official’ line do not hold up in light of the facts which can only mean that Norway is either run by a Marxist Dictatorship who control all functions of State and have closed the case down and white washed it for their own purposes, or there has been a successful coup just like Breivik stated when he was arrested on Utoya Island and the ruling Government have been neutralised and are too scared to challenge the ‘official’ line from their intelligentsia because of the possible consequences to them and their families. Their whole youth wing was practically wiped out in one day, which was the next generation of their ideologically trained Labour leadership and must be a great shock and burden to witness and experience for them.

If Breivik was able to carry out the acts that he carried out with impunity then someone else murdering a few politicians who challenge the ‘official’ line is not going to be hard is it and everyone in Norwegian politics must know this, and Breivik claims there are 2 more cells out there in Norway.

The King of Norway is the only stalwart of that Country now whilst there is a civil war within the Norwegian political class and I pray the Lord protects and guides him and his family whilst this unfolds around them and their people. He is the only one in authority who transcends politics who the people can look towards for leadership in these dark perilous times their Nation is now going through.

That is the role of Monarch within a Royal Kingdom.

I suppose he is even afraid though but if he is a good and wise Monarch then he will have his loyal power base and know the state of play and moves to make for the sake of ‘peace and security’ for his people within his Kingdom and the future life of the Nation. If not he is just a meaningless figure head with a rich Dynastic family who could be removed very easily with Norway turned into a Republic over night, so silence is sometimes better than being assassinated.

Time will tell and history will remember.

I’m not even from Norway but have been dragged into this for some reason and want the truth because I do not want the cold blooded murder of a bunch of innocent kids on my reputation and conscience. To be honest I have gone past caring about the memory of the dead now, not because I do not care about what happened to them because anyone of a sound mind and a basic form of humanity would because they were only young kids growing up and their youth camp was part of life’s learning process, but because if their families do not even care about them or their memories enough to speak out in their defence then why should I?

I have seen no real criticism of the ‘official’ line in the media even though it’s full of holes. They accept the ‘official’ line in Norway as if it is fact.

Why should I be a lone voice banging my head against a brick wall to get answers for ‘truth and justice’ to prevail when the power is in other people’s hands to force others to get those answers.

(I take that back because Dagbladet are now reporting people’s comments of the case, that police are still investigating so how can they claim Breivik’s group/network does not exist when they have not finished their investigation)

I will just leave my thoughts an opinions here in this open public format for the record and for the discourse over what happened in Norway on July 22nd 2011 and the aftermath of the events for others to read and form their own opinions from, seen as those I stood accused in the Worlds eye at the beginning of being the English ‘mentor’ behind the Norwegian monster Anders Breivik.

Then let the Lord’s vengeance fall upon those who orchestrated this.

The controlled mainstream media around the world are happy with the script they have been fed as the ‘official’ version of events in the Breivik case by the Norwegians which they have then go on to feed to their readerships as fact so as to create the public perception of the case ‘others’ want the public to believe.

A false perception with the real truth hidden from sight.

Are all these media moguls who control the Western mainstream media outlets all in the same boat and all singing from the same Norwegian State hymn sheet?

Thank God for the internet where you can get alternative news and the real news that is behind the so called news in the mainstream media if you go searching for it.

The mainstream media calls this type of stuff ‘conspiracy theories’ to discredit it in the eyes of their public readerships. The only thing with that though is my perception, thoughts and beliefs about this Breivik case are based upon my own personal experiences and from the snippets of information they have fed through their media outlets that corroborate my perception, thoughts and beliefs.

So call this a ‘conspiracy theory’ but this is firmly rooted in facts if you have the time to research it all, and then you draw your own conclusions or determine if my conclusion is right.

The main agenda of those controlling the case in Norway, whoever they are and for whatever reason, has been to have Breivik diagnosed as a paranoid schizophrenic who was psychotic, and their prosecutors are now battling this out in the court room with the script they have been handed down to them, to have Breivik declared ‘insane’ in front of the Worlds media.

If they secure the ‘insane’ label on him then everything else they have stated falsely about this case as the ‘official’ version of events will all fit nicely into place in the public’s perception.

He was a brainwashed insane ‘lone wolf’ with no friends who woke up one day in a state of psychosis and murdered a load of people because he was paranoid about the social political state of his Country after being inspired on the internet.

That’s what those in control of the Breivik case want the world to believe.

Then nobody will go looking for the real truth behind Breivik and the ‘Architects’ behind ‘Operation Breivik’ and what their real reasons and motivations are/were.

Does that serve ‘truth and justice’ in a Democracy?

We are fighting to promote Democracy in foreign lands and we do not even have Democracy in our own lands, well Norway anyway and I am yet to see about the UK with regards to Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake and his involvement with Breivik. The Gareth Williams case is a good bench mark to see that those who have the voice can use their voices to force others in Power to act on their behalf in the interest of ‘truth and justice’.

The Williams family have the media on their side and are not afraid to speak out on behalf of their murdered son and brother even though they are going up against MI6 who he worked for, and the police who originally investigated the case.

They want answers to the unanswered questions and will not settle for anything less!

The Norwegians in control of the Breivik case forced through the first psychiatric report that was used in their trial by media to re-enforce their ‘official’ version of Breivik the “solo terrorist” linked to no one who was insane. This worked well because all media outlets around the World reported this and created a perception in the public eye. This was the public’s perception for 7 months until many professionals in the field of psychiatry along with some of the families of the dead and survivors challenged this because they could obviously see that it did not add up.

Even the psychiatrists in the prison where Breivik was on remand who were dealing with him on a daily basis stated he was not a paranoid schizophrenic or psychotic.

And they were right, with the next psychiatrists writing a completely contradictory report to the first, although the psychiatric commission are now challenging their report as if it is not a credible report.

This says all you need to know about the ‘powers that be’ in Norway and what is going on there.

2 clear points in that first psychiatric report, although there are more, that make it an unsafe report which means it has no legal basis to even be in the courts proceedings is the fact that the Norwegian police stated to the psychiatrists that they had ‘concluded’ (finished) the line of enquiry into Breivik being connected to a network/group and they were satisfied that he was not, thus he was a “solo terrorist” linked to ‘no one’. When 3 weeks before the trial they admitted that they were still investigating this line of enquiry and that they were wrong in stating they had concluded back when they did which meant that Breivik was evaluated in the first report on the basis that it was a ‘fact’ from the police that he was not connected to anyone, when in reality it was not a ‘fact’, which meant that when he spoke of being involved with others in his interviews the psychiatrists would have evaluated this as delusions because the police told them it was, which they then reported as fact in their ‘official’ report.

That undermines the whole report and the diagnosis they gave him.

The other clear point in the first report that makes it unsafe is the fact that Breivik’s mother is a co-conspirator to his crimes. Her opinion of her son’s mental health is another fundamental part of the basis of the first report.

How can you form much of the basis of a psychiatric report on the word of someone who is intimately involved in the crime?

At the time she claimed her son was psychotic in the first psychiatric report she was laundering $600,000 of what can only be described as the financing of international terrorism through her own bank accounts for him.

Would you believe a word she said knowing she was intimately involved in his crimes?

On a professional basis would you even dream of writing a psychiatric report around her opinions?

Of course not, but that’s the state of the first psychiatric report that the Norwegian prosecutors are fighting to uphold against Breivik.

I say that is criminal but it’s from the Government’s State prosecutors themselves.

Also in the court the prosecutors are continuing the ‘official’ line of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one in their attempt to enforce the ‘insane’ label on him.

How can public prosecutors state something as a ‘fact’ in a court of law in front of the Worlds media when the police have not finished their investigation into this line of enquiry yet?

Mickey mouse justice that people would not have expected from Norway.

Quote: We stand in wonder at how they can conclude that the Knights Templar does not exist, when the investigation is clearly not resolved. There are a number of tracks abroad that you have not been mapped, as both Liberia and England tour, tours, and we ask the question of why it is not followed up better. We fear that the police have decided that the organization does not exist and therefore do not believe in investigating the various tracks, Bæra says to Dagbladet.

Quote: The third day in court claimed that Breivik just these Facebook accounts that police have not had access to, may reveal a clue to his alleged organization Knights Templar.
The police have long sought to gain insight into two older accounts that Breivik even deleted in 2010. He has even claimed that he was at its height had 8000 friends. These are interesting for the police so they can identify who Breivik had contact with during the planning of terrorist attack.

Breivik for some reason wants the police to find the existence of his group/network and has claimed that there is a possible clue inside 2 facebook accounts that the police still have not had access to, so as to be able to determine if there are any links or clues inside Breivik’s most active accounts that contained about 8,000 people between them. Yet the Norwegian State prosecutors are now in the court room stating Breivik is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one, when there is still evidence to go through to determine whether or not that is a fact or not.

I should think Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook has an obligation before the law to allow the Norwegian investigators access to those accounts.

Those are 2 very clear points above to show that there is a State controlled cover up of the truth, and all under the gaze of the Worlds media, only the Worlds media are not challenging these points, they are continuing to propagate the ‘official’ line that is coming from the Norwegian State prosecutors without looking at the facts behind the points being prosecuted on.

There are more points below but these are the most relevant that people will be able to acknowledge as they are prominent now in the courts proceedings.

Breivik’s answer to the prosecutors not believing he is connected to a network/group is that Norwegian police logic is that if they cannot see them or find them then they do not exist. The truth is the Norwegian State prosecutors do not care, they have their script that has come down from above and that is what they must stick to, and their attitude is that everyone will be on their side because nobody is on Breivik’s side so it doesn’t matter if the truth is lost in the middle of the court room (nobody will see or realise). They will have the result they want, irrespective of whether or not it is true and they will fight for it, rather than fight for ‘truth and justice’ which is what a court of law is meant to be all about.

That is called a Government cover up because the ruling Marxist Labour party are the ones in power so have the ultimate control.

I am not on Breivik’s side, and in no way support or defend him, but if they say he is not connected to anyone then that means those who orchestrated July 22nd 2011 and my involvement will get away with their actions towards me that could have gone VERY BADLY!!! For me, and I will always be tainted with the lies that were aimed at me for reasons the Norwegian police know and I am not going to accept that for my life.

That does not serve ‘truth and justice’ for me and my family.

If you look at the evidence and come to a different conclusion to mine and believe that the State prosecutors are right and that the first psychiatric report is right then do not waste your time reading any further.

Stick your head back in the sand…

Who dares to challenge the ‘official’ line though? They are working on the basis that if people challenge the ‘official’ line then that means they support Breivik and nobody wants to be tainted with supporting Breivik so there is a collective silence surrounding the case.

I support ‘truth and justice’ and propagating falsehoods as facts is not ‘truth and justice’. Breivik cannot escape the punishment for his crimes, but this is not about that now, this is about finding the truth behind Breivik that ‘others’ do not want to be made known for some reason.

Then you question who are the ones writing the script from above?

The military intelligence infrastructure of Norway who carried out a successful coup on July 22nd 2011 with a transference of power within the internal power base of the Country or the Norwegian Government who are showing themselves to be a Dictatorship and not a Democracy in front of the eyes of the World?

Breivik is the son of a former Diplomat to London so comes from the political class of Norway, and was also the step son of a former Army Major.

He carried out a terrorist mission against his ruling Government on July 22nd 2011 and called it a coup de tat.

It’s not rocket science when you look at the facts, but those in control of the case in Norway do not want the public to see or know the facts, or not in one cohesive narrative anyway. They want the public to believe Breivik is a “solo terrorist” linked to no one who is insane and are doing so in a court of law in front of the world.

A nice clean story when behind the scenes the truth is known and held from the public for whatever reasons.

Below is a list of some unanswered questions in the case that need answering that conflict with the ‘official’ version now being propagated in the Norwegian court room, I am not going to write on length about each individual one as I have written about them anyway so you can click on the link to them and read for yourself and make your own mind up.

1) For me this is the most important piece of evidence still missing from the public record of the case. As soon as I realised I had been set up with Breivik I stated “Alan Lake” the director behind the EDL was where this came from, and 9 months on all evidence now completely proves my first assumption as being right yet no action has been taken against him.
Alan Lake has a friend who calls himself ‘Richard the Lioneart’ yet this person has not been disclosed to the public and nobody knows whether or not the police have interviewed him yet about his possible involvement with Breivik as being the English ‘mentor’ Breivik speaks about in his manifesto.
I personally believe Alan Lake is the ‘mentor’ and this ‘Richard the Lionheart’ is the conduit between them, and there are witnesses who can confirm this person’s existence along with an email stating those people and this person’s existence.

2) Where did Breivik learn how to create a bomb big enough to blow up his Government building?
There is talk of the Belarusian security services claiming that Breivik was paramilitary trained in Belarus inside a training camp run by a former Soviet Colonel which would fit in with where he learned his bomb making skills, only this has not been confirmed or denied.
If this is true then someone made the connection for Breivik to attend the camp, which would mean Breivik is connected to a someone/network which conflicts with the ‘official’ line.

3) Breivik laundered $600,000 through 3 of his mothers bank accounts which was said to be the proceeds of selling fake diplomas and certificates online. If Breivik was selling fake diplomas and certificates online then why did he not make false id for himself and open up 3 clean untraceable accounts rather than use his own mother’s accounts and involve her?
$600,000 is a lot of money to be made on the back of selling fake diplomas and certificates, so was the money really the financing of international terrorism which places his mother in a much more extremely serious position as a co-conspirator to the events of July 22nd 2011?
Why has she not been charged for conspiracy or Breivik offered a deal for his mothers immunity?
He laundered the money through accounts in 11 different countries, and the Norwegian prosecutors want the public to believe he was a failed business man.
Who taught Breivik the art of international banking? Alan Lake works in a prestigious bank has several money funneling businesses and is connected to several high profile people in other large high profile European banks around the world.

4) Breivik travelled to Liberia in 2002 at the height of the bloody civil war in the Country where he said he met a Serbian war criminal which the Norwegian police believe is a fact. On his return 1 - 2 weeks later he then travelled to London where he says the secret founding meeting took place with a group of like minded political right-wing individuals.
This is where ‘Operation Breivik’ began, and he was assigned his alleged English ‘mentor’ codenamed ‘Richard the Lionheart’.
The Norwegian prosecutors do not believe this meeting took place for some reason, which put into context with all of their other false claims about Breivik is in-line with their ‘official’ version of events they want the public to believe. I heard a little of their belief behind the explanation of these trips that just does not add up when held against the facts. They believe Breivik's Liberia trip had something to do with a Nigerian scam, but how that ends up with Breivik traveling to Liberia during the civil war I don't know, but it looks good for the cameras to dispel the real truth behind this in the public eye.

Further reading: The Liberia – London connection

5) There are witnesses from the surrounding farms to where Breivik rented his one who have said they saw men visiting his farm on several occasions before July 22nd 2011, which have been completely dismissed by the Norwegian police.
There was a telephone call to the Ministry threatening the impending attacks that Breivik claims he did not make which if true means someone else in Norway knew of what was going to happen which obviously means Breivik is not alone in Norway which means his claims of there being other potential 'cells' out there are true.

Further reading: A question of doubt

6) 2 Norwegian Democrat MP’s were recorded at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference talking about blowing up their Government building and assassinating members of the Government exactly like Breivik did and had planned to do.
The leader of Stop the Islamisation of Norway has a Facebook group with over 10,000 members who support Breivik and his actions. 2 + 2 usually = 4 to most people.
SION is directly connected to Alan Lake and Fraudman who Breivik named his manifesto after: “A European Declaration of Independence”.

7) Breivik travelled extensively around Europe and to several other Continents and the Norwegian prosecutors want you to believe that over the course of those 10 years and his traveling itinerary he never met any other like-minded individuals when he was actively searching these people out. This would obviously conflict with their “solo terrorist” linked to no one ‘official’ line to admit that he met other like-minded individuals on his travels and was in contact with them. Instead they want everyone to believe Breivik met no one and was a loner who only played computer games in his bedroom at his mother’s house.

8) Breivik was ridiculed about his claim of meeting with other trained single man cell’s and the cell’s commander on several occasions due to the fact that he was only in the location for 17 hours and 19 hours.

9) Breivik’s “2083” manifesto has been written in picture perfect English which would be an impossibility for what the Norwegian prosecutors have described as a high school dropout. He also lived in America so learnt American English and not British English. Picture perfect English would be an impossibility for most people without a degree in English grammar, so who wrote the “2083” manifesto, or who edited it for Breivik if he is a “solo terrorist” linked to no one?

His real English ‘mentor’?

10) Breivik claims he is a part of the Gladio network that was set up after the Second World War to defend Europe from a communist threat and take-over. It consists of secretive little groups of trained terrorists, with Breivik claiming there are 2 more cell’s in Norway ready to strike that the Norwegian prosecutors do not believe. When Breivik called the police in the middle of his bloodbath and massacre on Utoya Island at a time he was supposed to by psychotic if you believe the first psychiatric report, he stated “I am Ander’s Breivik of the anti-communist resistance movement” which along with his personal reasoning behind his actions is in-line with Gladio ideology just as he claims. There is said to have been a Gladio (stay behind) network in place in Norway after WW2.

Those are just some of the unanswered questions that need answering that conflict with the ‘official’ version of events in Norway of Breivik the "solo terrorist" linked to no one.

A question for Knights Templar England

2012-05-04T14:17:00.004Z

Considering Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is directly connected through a mutual property business to Penny Jonas who is fund director at Temple Church London, home of the Knights Templar in England; Is Alan Ayling a member of the Masonic Order of Knights Templar in England?

This is a critical question that needs answering from within their Organisation if they do not support Alan Ayling and his right-wing political activities that in my mind have resulted in the massacre in Norway.

Breivik is heavily influenced ideologically by someone in England and has claimed he did have an English 'mentor' assigned to him in 2002 which links in with the Masonic Order of Knights Templar's inside Breivik's "2083" manifesto if Ayling/Lake is a member.

The "2083" manifesto is written in picture perfect English so it is safe to assume it did not come fully from Breivik himself and originated or was edited by someone with a high level of English literacy.

I don't believe Breivik put together the writing for his video either although I could be wrong, but the writings between the video and manifesto have 2 completely different feels to them in my opinion.

Alan Ayling made a public statement over the Norway massacre and claimed he had no compunction to support or endorse any movement promoting Templarism and resisted all attempts at the beginning to do so, even though he has been running around as the director behind the EDL for the past 3 years.

Video: The folly of Alan Lake

Would be extremely incriminating against him if it is found that he is/was a member of the Masonic Order of Knights Templar in England after making such a public statement over the events in Norway.

It should not be hard for the right people mixing in the right circles to find out the answer to that question, and that is a question that needs answering now.

EDL director Alan Lake

2012-05-04T13:47:00.003Z

Further reading: Alan Lake's 'Final Solution'

Further reading: Alan Lake - food for thought

Further reading: Lake's friend batty Berta Moore

Supernatural

2012-05-04T13:42:00.001Z