<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Liverpool Echo - Hidden Agendas</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2008-02-08:/hiddenagendas//927</id>
    <updated>2009-05-05T17:17:25Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>When the circus comes to town (part 2)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/05/when-the-circus-comes-to-town-1.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.134588</id>

    <published>2009-05-05T17:04:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-05T17:17:25Z</updated>

    <summary> HAVEN&apos;T we done well on Merseyside in the last few days? In 24 hours between Friday and Saturday I had the pleasure (it&apos;s a figure of speech) of the company of Tory leader David Cameron, literal political heavy-hitter John...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="davidcameron" label="David Cameron" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="eddieizzard" label="Eddie Izzard" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="johnprescott" label="John Prescott" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="paddyashdown" label="Paddy Ashdown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="prescott.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/prescott.jpg" width="360" height="480" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>HAVEN'T we done well on Merseyside in the last few days? In 24 hours between Friday and Saturday I had the pleasure (it's a figure of speech) of the company of Tory leader David Cameron, literal political heavy-hitter John Prescott, 'surreal' (a word without parity bar 'ironic' in the bastardised-language stakes) comedian and Europhile Eddie Izzard and former Liberal Democrat leader Paddy Ashdown. Now if that's not a 'smorgasbord', I don't know what is.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>They were each here for their different reasons: Cameron was on the Wirral to meet with businesses likely to feel the pinch of the government's back-dated port rates plan, while Two Jags and Izzard were grandstanding for Labour ahead of the June 4 European Parliament elections. And Ashdown, well, one of them had to be peddling a book, didn't he?</p>

<p>It's a while since I last saw Cameron. Well, not that long, actually. We were sick of the sight of each other by the end of the Crewe and Nantwich By-election last year, the Tories having thrown all their weight at that particular campaign. And a lot has happened since last May.  Although the Conservative leader hasn't really given away much more as to what his party intends to do if elected to government, the world's economy has taken a further nosedive and Labour are looking like they're inches away from clinching a spectacular defeat at the next General Election with little help needed from anyone else.</p>

<p>But although Cameron was as quick to remind us of this as ever, Prescott and Izzard were having none of it. Pitching up beside his 'battle bus' (which is actually a battle mini-bus), Prezza managed to draw a small crowd, firstly the usual wave of 'Is that John Prescott-ers', who evolve into 'That's John Prescott-ers' before either dispersing or loitering around to listen, heckle or ... you never know ... throw eggs.</p>

<p>There were, unfortunately, no free-range shenanigans on his visit to Liverpool, although Prescott is a relatively shrewd operator who knows how to diffuse what could be an awkward question. Hence, before I could even get the word Chumbawumba out, he'd cracked a joke about the egging, the ensuing punch-up, the two Jags, the bucket of iced water. The only one he didn't give over to the realm of light entertainment was the bulimia. Oh, and the croquet, which a Scouser very helpfully reminded him of when he was in full campaign song. </p>

<p>Oh, the egg incident, winning what had to be the best response to any question ever given by Tony Blair. His appraisal: "John is John".  Anyway, even if there had been no eggs, I'm sure as soon as he clocked that Welsh farmer's mullet he would have given him the Two Jabs treatment anyway.</p>

<p>Back in the city cntre, Izzard and Arlene McCarthy MEP, it has to be said, stood there looking like neither one of them knew why they, or the other one, was there. And after about twenty minutes of lukewarm campaigning, off they all went.</p>

<p>Ashdown, or 'Pantsdown', as legend has it a Fleet Street tea lady crowned him, was in town to sign copies of his book, 'A Fortunate Life'. Having not read it, I can't say hand on heart I know whose fortunate life it revolves around exactly.</p>

<p>He is a very human character, it has to be said. Likeable, even, which was not how one opinion poll would have had it in the run up to the 1997 General Election, when, by his own admission, an asterisk was placed above his name because pollsters had been unable to detect any support across the length and breadth of the country. With that as a starting point, it's fair to say he did rather well to draw the forty or so Lib Dems at Zelig's Italian restaurant in Liverpool One on Saturday.</p>

<p>But from this rollercoaster of excitement, there's one memory I will take away. On Friday afternoon, as Prescott and Izzard drew to a close and the crowd of sixty or so (made up in no small part by Labour supporters) had dispersed, I set off back to the office. About a hundred yards further down Church Street, just at the junction with Whitechapel, I saw a throng of what must have been upwards of 200 people stood around in a ring. Who could this be, I wondered, to draw such a crowd?</p>

<p>The answer could not have been better if I had made it up. There, stood at the centre, was a clown performing a clown routine, complete with big shoes, baggy pockets, the lot. And the crowd, oblivious to who had been standing at the other end of the street, were hooked. </p>

<p>Well, somebody did say the European elections were on.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Wedlock deadlock</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/05/wedlock-deadlock.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.134318</id>

    <published>2009-05-03T12:39:10Z</published>
    <updated>2009-05-03T12:41:36Z</updated>

    <summary> It is fair to say I&apos;ve been somewhat quiet on the blogging front of late, but bearing in mind recent headlines, who can blame me? You will all no doubt be aware of the fall from grace of Labour...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Analysis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="louisebaldock" label="Louise Baldock" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="standardsboard" label="Standards Board" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
It is fair to say I've been somewhat quiet on the blogging front of late, but bearing in mind recent headlines, who can blame me?</p>

<p>You will all no doubt be aware of the fall from grace of Labour ethical standards spokeswoman Louise Baldock, whose blog entries of 2007 declaring "All Lib Dems are bastards" precipitated her resignation from the council's standards committee and the shadow board.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>It's certainly a word with a rich political history. Who can forget John Major's appraisal of his own cabinet as "bastards" during his slow and painful political death? Was he wrong? Was Cllr Baldock wrong? Were the comments she made nearly two years ago any more valid then than they are now? Are they entirely unfounded and invalid?</p>

<p>Such wrangling aside, the interesting issue where Cllr Baldock is concerned was not what she said, but how it was said, or, more accurately, how it was communicated. There is a lot of pressure on politicians to harness the web as a way of engaging with their constituents, although there are mixed views as to this strategy's success. There are statistics for Merseyside that would suggest that in some of the more deprived wards, broadband access is as low as 18 per cent. So, for some of us living in the information age, connected in some way or not, information is still at a premium.</p>

<p>But the fact that not many people would have read Cllr Baldock's comments is a limited defence, not that, in credit to her, she has tried to argue that defence. What then of the defence that the comments were not made in her capacity as a councillor? After all, that she was not wearing that hat was the finding of the Standards Board, which effectively cleared her on that basis. </p>

<p>The problem with blogs is that they are not private diaries. One may as well don the town crier's outfit and bellow from the Town Hall steps. But the words don't fade, they linger in the air, tying themselves in knots and waiting for you to walk by another time and get your neck snared in them.</p>

<p>Forgive the stray into metaphor, but you forget how liberating blogging is, don't you? The government may promote it (it's free, after all), but Cllr Baldock has been forced to fall on her ethical sword because she did exhibit one particular ethical virtue: transparency.</p>

<p>There are much worse things said about our politicians out there in the recesses of the internet. Unfortunately for her, whatever disclaimers about headgear her blog may contain, she was wearing the Louise Baldock hat. So, if you don't want to fall foul of the ethical police, the only way to operate is in disguise.</p>

<p>And that's where the true power of the blog comes in. Surely what government really wants when it talks about harnessing the power of the web is for its supporters to get out there and mix up a heady brew of smear, slur and sleaze to undermine opponents in such ways as it would simply be puerile and indecent to do in person. Look around Liverpool, there are blogs there for people of all political shapes and sizes, but you're hard pressed to find one boasting anything but the anodyne unless its author is cloaked in anonymity. Entertaining they may be, but then you always get those serial comment-leavers, the usual suspects who prowl around all of them and, if they're feeling particularly original, go under the name of 'Anonymous'. They are, ultimately, engaging in the debate by the online equivalent of shouting through someone's letter box and running away. </p>

<p>But then, there's always good old fashioned getting out there and facing the music. A friend of mine was sat at home the other day when a card from a prospective parliamentary candidate (who shall, of course, remain anonymous) dropped through the door bemoaning the fact that they "had called today but you weren't in".  Without so much as a knock. </p>

<p>Now with engagement like that, who needs blogging?</p>

<p></p>

<p> </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Standards schmandards</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/02/standards-schmandards.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.122372</id>

    <published>2009-02-19T10:32:42Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-19T10:38:31Z</updated>

    <summary> A CITY leader is at the centre of a standards investigation into claims he was rude and offensive to a charity set up to encourage black people into politics. Liberal group leader Cllr Steve Radford is alleged to have...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="889099.JPG" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/889099.JPG" width="340" height="206" class="mt-image-right" style="float: right; margin: 0 0 20px 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>A CITY leader is at the centre of a standards investigation into claims he was rude and offensive to a charity set up to encourage black people into politics.<br />
 Liberal group leader Cllr Steve Radford is alleged to have breached the Members Code of Conduct in comments he made to members of the national body Operation Black Vote. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
The row broke out after Cllr Radford took offence at OBV members addressing him as a Liberal Democrat rather than a Liberal.<br />
 It came to a head when the openly gay member blasted the organisation's "stupidity" in writing to him at the Lib Dem headquarters in Wavertree rather than the Liberal HQ in Tuebrook, telling OBV "If you can't respect my role as leader and president of the Liberal Party do not write to me at all".<br />
 Documents obtained by the ECHO reveal OBV then told Cllr Radford he was at times "neither decent or polite" and that his rudeness "would not be tolerated". <br />
 Its director Simon Woolley wrote to Cllr Radford to say the matter would be referred to his party officials, but the Electoral Commission-funded organisation addressed the complaint not to the local Liberal party, but to Liberal Democrat council leader Cllr Warren Bradley and ex-leader Cllr Mike Storey.<br />
 The matter is now being investigated by the local standards committee, which fears it could "bring the council into disrepute". Cllr Bradley has told the ECHO he passed the complaint on, saying it contained "serious allegations".<br />
 He added: "I think it would have been inappropriate if I did not forward them."<br />
 The standards committee has written to Cllr Radford to offer him an "opportunity to apologise". In its letter, it explains that "given the nature of the organisation concerned and its national standing, there is a possibility it may damage the future relationship between the city council and Operation Black Vote and as such could bring the council into disrepute."<br />
 But Cllr Radford said he was standing firm.<br />
 "If an organisation that is supposed to encourage people to get involved in politics doesn't know the difference between a Liberal and a Liberal Democrat, having been corrected twice in public, then it's not for me to apologise.<br />
 "And here we have the Lib Dems who say standards boards have no function and are used for petty trivia, referring something like this. <br />
 "There's an old gay phrase they would do well to note: closet queens in glasshouses shouldn't swing handbags."<br />
 The standards committee and Operation Black Vote director Mr Woolley both declined to comment.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Over ... but not out</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/02/over-but-not-out.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.120550</id>

    <published>2009-02-06T08:39:55Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-06T09:53:21Z</updated>

    <summary> They say eternity is a long time, especially towards the end. They also say a week is a long time in politics. Needless to say, it would not have been wise to have held one&apos;s breath while waiting for...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bradley" label="Bradley" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="harborow" label="Harborow" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="standardsboard" label="Standards Board" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="bradleypic.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/bradleypic.jpg" width="350" height="227" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span><br />
They say eternity is a long time, especially towards the end. They also say a week is a long time in politics.</p>

<p>Needless to say, it would not have been wise to have held one's breath while waiting for the 16-month inquiry into whether city leader Warren Bradley had bullied and conspired against former Culture boss Jason Harborow.</p>

<p>Who knew how it would all end? Certainly not Cllr Bradley himself, who had no idea he had been cleared until I rang him to get his reaction. Talk about being the first for breaking news.</p>

<p>He was at work in his job as a fireman when I called, and knew nothing of the verdict because the report of the decision had been delivered to his council offices. Pretty much as soon as the letter was signed for, the details were released to the media, even before anyone knew whether he was aware he had been given the all clear. </p>

<p>Cllr Bradley , who could have been forced to stand down over allegations he had bullied and conspired against Mr Harborow, was found to have been "naive and unwise" but was cleared of breaking the Members' Code of Conduct.</p>

<p>There will be some long faces out there today, not only within the Labour group, but within the ruling Liberal Democrat administration. There are plotters, and he knows it, but following the judgement the assassins brigade will have to sink back into the shadows ... for the mean time, at least. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
THE STANDARDS BOARD FINDINGS AGAINST CLLR WARREN BRADLEY</p>

<p>The complainants alleged that following the cancellation of the Mathew Street Festival on 2 August 2007, Councillor Warren Bradley's conduct made the position of Jason Harborow, the chief executive of the Liverpool Culture Company, untenable.</p>

<p>It was alleged that Councillor Bradley:</p>

<p>demanded in an email on 3 August 2007, circulated to all members of his political group, that Liverpool City Council's chief executive suspend Jason Harborow immediately<br />
criticised Jason Harborow in the press following the festival's cancellation</p>

<p>personally treated Jason Harborow in a disrespectful and bullying manner, including a verbal attack in a meeting on 26 September 2007</p>

<p>continued to criticise Jason Harborow for the festival's cancellation, following the publication of the council's Mathew Street investigation report and contrary to its findings</p>

<p>met privately with an ex-council officer, Mr Lee Forde, on 18 November 2007 in order to conspire against Jason Harborow with a view to removing him from his position</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer found that, after the Mathew Street Festival was cancelled, Councillor Bradley emailed the council's chief executive, Colin Hilton, and demanded that Jason Harborow be relieved of his duties until the investigation into the cancellation was over. </p>

<p>The ethical standards officer took the view that while a councillor can request or suggest that an authority's chief executive carry out a certain action, a member cannot direct the chief executive to comply with the request. Liverpool City Council's member-officer protocol makes it clear that it is quite proper for a member to inform the chief executive if they are concerned about a senior officer's performance. However, the responsibility for handling the complaint lies with the chief executive.</p>

<p>In considering whether the email amounted to a failure to treat Jason Harborow with respect, the ethical standards officer considered the context in which the email was sent, together with Councillor Bradley's subsequent actions. The ethical standards officer accepted Colin Hilton's view that Councillor Bradley had sent the email in the heat of the moment, and recognised that the relationship between the leader and chief executive of a council must allow for a full and frank exchange of views. Furthermore she took into account Councillor Bradley's acceptance of Colin Hilton's decision not to act as directed. </p>

<p>In sending the email the ethical standards officer did not consider that Councillor Bradley was being deliberately malicious or insulting, but was genuinely concerned, along with others, about the festival's sudden cancellation.  The ethical standards officer did not consider that Councillor Bradley failed to treat Jason Harborow with respect. </p>

<p>After emailing Colin Hilton, Councillor Bradley sent a hard copy of his email to all the elected members in his political group. The content of this email was subsequently published in a local newspaper. Although the ethical standards officer considered Councillor Bradley must take some responsibility for the considerable personal and professional difficulty felt by Jason Harborow following the email's publication, she accepted that Councillor Bradley did not intend this to happen and recognised that Councillor Bradley should have been able to send confidential information to his political group with the expectation of it remaining confidential.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer considered that, during media interviews in the days following the cancellation, Councillor Bradley was careful not to blame individual officers. He was, however, damning about Culture Company officers in general, saying that he was 'absolutely disgusted' by their actions and the way they had treated members was 'deplorable'. The ethical standards officer took the view that these comments reflected badly on the Culture Company's chief executive and would have made his job more difficult. Councillor Bradley's failure to respond to comments in the press about his professional relationship with Jason Harborow, after the email was published, further undermined Jason Harborow's ability to carry out his job.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer took the view that, as council leader, Councillor Bradley would have been expected to comment on the festival's cancellation and that it was not unreasonable of him to hold the Culture Company to account. He did not refer specifically to Jason Harborow in his interviews, and his failure to respond to further coverage after his email was published could not be considered gratuitously offensive. </p>

<p>Accordingly, the ethical standards officer did not conclude that Councillor Bradley had breached the Code of Conduct in this respect.</p>

<p>When Councillor Bradley met Jason Harborow on 26 September 2007, Councillor Bradley blamed him, in front of Colin Hilton, for not giving the council a more substantive role in the launch of the Capital of Culture programme. Jason Harborow forcefully defended his position and a heated exchange followed.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer considered that, as the most senior officer in the Culture Company, its chief executive should be able to handle criticism from the council leader in a private meeting, and be prepared for robust discussion. Jason Harborow's own account suggested this was the case. Furthermore, such heated debate between the two men was not the norm, previous exchanges having been courteous, and the ethical standards officer did not therefore conclude that Councillor Bradley had bullied Jason Harborow.</p>

<p>In September 2007 Jason Harborow submitted a grievance against the council. The council's independent legal advisors warned that if Jason Harborow made a claim for constructive dismissal, the council would likely have to settle it. </p>

<p>The council's acting city solicitor wrote to Councillor Bradley on 14 November 2007 and advised him to avoid doing or saying anything that could be interpreted as unfair criticism of Jason Harborow. Two days later Councillor Bradley gave an interview to a local newspaper about the Mathew Street investigation report. The ethical standards officer considered that during the interview Councillor Bradley implied that Jason Harborow should have been aware of a breakdown in communications in the Culture Company and should think about resigning.</p>

<p>It was not the ethical standards officer's role to judge whether Councillor Bradley's opinion on the Mathew Street report was valid, although she did consider that Councillor Bradley had been given specific legal advice in relation to talking about Jason Harborow and that his comments were therefore unwise. However, in considering whether they amounted to a failure to treat Jason Harborow with respect, the ethical standards officer had to be satisfied that they were unreasonable and personally demeaning. </p>

<p>As council leader, Councillor Bradley was tasked with responding to media questions about the Mathew Street investigation. During the interview, Councillor Bradley tried to avoid commenting directly on Jason Harborow's position. Although the ethical standards officer took the view that, when pushed, Councillor Bradley had implied that the chief executive should consider his position, she did not consider, given the circumstances and the language he used, that his comments were serious enough to constitute a breach of the Code of Conduct.</p>

<p>On 18 November Councillor Bradley met Councillor Mike Storey and Lee Forde at his home. The ethical standards officer considered that Councillor Bradley arranged the meeting to discuss the perceived failings of the Mathew Street report and to give Lee Forde the opportunity to present Councillor Bradley with any evidence he might have in relation to it. Councillor Bradley has recognised that his meeting with Lee Forde was unwise and possibly naïve. The ethical standards officer considered this to be particularly so as Lee Forde was in the process of taking out an unfair dismissal case against the council.  However, conflicting accounts of the meeting made it impossible for the ethical standards officer to conclude exactly what was discussed. She was, therefore, not satisfied that Councillor Bradley failed to treat Jason Harborow with respect by conspiring against him at the meeting on 18 November.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer considered that during the period under investigation, Councillor Bradley's conduct occasionally suggested lack of good judgement, and that it contributed to Jason Harborow feeling undermined in his role. However, in considering whether Councillor Bradley's conduct brought his office or authority into disrepute, the ethical standards officer has recognised the pressure Councillor Bradley was under to deliver such a high profile event as Capital of Culture, and that the deterioration of his relationship with Jason Harborow was played out in the most public of arenas. While some of Councillor Bradley's actions could be said to have damaged his personal reputation, for conduct to be disreputable to a member's office or authority there must, in the ethical standards officer's view, generally be some additional element pointing to a lapse in standards, such as an improper motive, unlawfulness, the hope of personal gain or gratuitously offensive behaviour. Based on the evidence the ethical standards officer saw, she did not consider this to be the case here.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer has provided a copy of her full report to the standards committee of Liverpool City Council to assist it in its work to instil and promote the need for high ethical standards among members.</p>

<p>The ethical standards officer found that no further action was necessary.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Loadsamoney?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/01/loadsamoney.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.119471</id>

    <published>2009-01-30T10:28:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-30T10:33:22Z</updated>

    <summary> Last week the Echo reported that city council staff earning more than £50,000 were collectively reaping in more than £12m a year. At Wednesday night&apos;s full council meeting, Liberal ward Cllr Steve Radford brought an amendment to the Lib...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
    <category term="fatcats" label="fat cats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sickpay" label="sick pay" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="steveradford" label="Steve Radford" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="moneypic.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/moneypic.jpg" width="450" height="299" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>Last week the Echo reported that city council staff earning more than £50,000 were collectively reaping in more than £12m a year.</p>

<p> At Wednesday night's full council meeting, Liberal ward Cllr Steve Radford brought an amendment to the Lib Dem's budget which, to everyone's surprise, the ruling administration agreed to. The amendment will, Cllr Radford hopes, streamline staffing costs by ending the culture of excessive spending on officers, and particularly long sick periods at full pay. </p>

<p>Officers, needless to say, looked somewhat perturbed by the unanimous support for the changes, which will see sick pay costs limited and also a reduction in the number of middle managers who, while front-liners like lollipop ladies are under threat, seem to be all but immune to the ravages of the credit crunch. </p>

<p>But is this a victory for common sense or just a bit of good old fashioned fat cat bashing? </p>

<p>The full amendment is below:</p>

<p>"The city council notes with alarm that over the past decade the council savings have come from disproportionately cutting back the employment of low paid, part-time front line staff.</p>

<p>"At the same time, council spending on high paid managerial staff, consultants and publicity has exploded.</p>

<p>"Having regard to this statement, the attached be approved:</p>

<p>"A constitutional review process be started to consider amending the delegated powers to officers to award contracts for the hiring of a consultancy and that such powers be placed with a review subcommittee of the Corporate Services Select Committee.</p>

<p>"The Chief Executive (as Head of the Paid Service) carry out a detailed review of the span of control and report on the reasons for continuing with any post where the responsibility is for less than eight other posts.</p>

<p>"The Chief Executive to also report upon the opportunities and implications of reducing the layers of management in the council.</p>

<p>"This council notes with alarm the disciplinary procedures and performance reviews have often been frustrated by senior staff going sick whilst retaining the high payroll monies of a key role.</p>

<p>"Therefore the council instructs officers, working within all national and local conditions and all legislative requirements, to carry out negotiation to all management pay terms and conditions to limit sick pay costs.</p>

<p>"The chief executive report back on the opportunities and implications of reducing advertising expenditure by 20%.</p>

<p>"The chief executive bring forward a report reviewing the council's policy towards the augmentation of pensions.</p>

<p>"These reviews and measures are expected to produce significant savings in future years which should be used to reduce the planned level of council tax in future years.</p>

<p>"However, the immediate financial effect in 2009/10 may be limited and therefore a contingency provision of only £10,000 be established at this time and the budget provision for advertising costs within the Marketing Service to be reduced accordingly."</p>

<p>Any clearer? Your comments, please ...</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Bradley Effect?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/01/the-bradley-effect.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.117629</id>

    <published>2009-01-21T10:50:11Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-21T10:55:53Z</updated>

    <summary> ONE bright New Hampshire morning last year, in the grip of election fever, Merseyside man Carl Roper stepped up to the porch of an ordinary house in an ordinary street to canvas votes for Barack Obama. After a knock...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Views" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bradleyeffect" label="Bradley Effect" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="obama" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tuc" label="TUC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Obamapic.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/Obamapic.jpg" width="350" height="236" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>ONE bright New Hampshire morning last year, in the grip of election fever, Merseyside man Carl Roper stepped up to the porch of an ordinary house in an ordinary street to canvas votes for Barack Obama.</p>

<p>After a knock at the door, a figure approached, opened the door and peered out through the netted fly screen at the stranger.</p>

<p>We're here to drum up support for Obama, can we rely on your vote, asked TUC project worker Carl. </p>

<p>The woman (or man, it happened more than once), would look back into the darkness of the house and, asked who they would vote for, gently nod or point towards the red and blue leaflets proclaiming Obama and the change you could believe in. This was, in a state whose motto "Live free or die", the vote that dare not speak its name,.</p>

<p>But in the end, the Obama vote found its voice and went on to defeat Republican John McCain in November's election. Yesterday, the world watched as the first ever African American man was sworn in as commander-in-chief of the West's biggest superpower. What was unthinkable forty years ago, let alone three hundred years ago, had been achieved.</p>

<p>Carl says he had been anxious in the run up to the election that despite the momentum of the Obama campaign, the Illinois senator could fall to the 'Bradley Effect'.</p>

<p>It's worth pointing out that the Bradley Effect has nothing to do with Liverpool's own leading man, Warren Bradley, and that there is absolutely no likelihood that Obama should himself embroiled in any Standards Board investigations in the immediate future. </p>

<p>And probably a good thing. The House of Representatives had managed to impeach Bill Clinton, and he had managed to get acquitted, in the time it's taken the Adjudication Panel to come back with a verdict on everyone's favourite fireman. </p>

<p>Joking aside, the term was coined following the 1982 California gubernorial campaign of black politician Tom Bradley, who days before the ballot enjoyed a significant lead. </p>

<p>However, when it came to it, his opponent George Deukmejian won. Voters, it seemed, no matter what they said in public, just couldn't bring themselves to vote for a black man.</p>

<p>Carl says, "There was always the chance the Bradley effect. It happened to us, where people on their doorsteps would not say they were voting for Obama. Clearly there were people in the house who thought they were going to vote for McCain. </p>

<p>"The worry was, when they got to the polling station, were they going to vote for Obama or not? </p>

<p>"I think in the end, he did better in some states than he would have expected."</p>

<p>So the Bradley Effect was almost working in reverse, with people feeling it was the expected thing to do to vote McCain while secretly harbouring support for Obama. </p>

<p>For Carl, now the deal is done and Obama has been safely inaugurated, the question is how the victory will influence political campaigning and, importantly, encourage more participation in politics in the UK at a time when people are becoming more and more apathetic and turn-outs are at record lows. </p>

<p>But Carl says the UK has already seen something of an Obama moment.</p>

<p>Carl adds, "The Obama campaign was not entirely dissimilar to the Labour victory in 1997, but there were a lot more people out there who may have regarded themselves as apolitical working on the campaign, certainly more than you would expect.</p>

<p>"A lot of people who would have regarded themselves as non-political got involved in the campaign, they had enthusiasm and wanted to make their mark."</p>

<p>And how far did the Obama campaign go towards involving black and ethnic minority votes? </p>

<p>"A majority of the people we were with were white Americans, but we want to a meeting when they were literally bringing in bus loads of trade unionists, and about eighty per cent of them were black.</p>

<p>"I spoke to a guy from New York and he said they were having to turn people away because there wasn't room for them all to sit down and do the campaign work.</p>

<p>"If you think he had around $600m dollars for his campaign and I think most of that came from small donations."</p>

<p>So, having been out there and seen first hand, are the people going to be disappointed? Let's face it, with the last eight years behind them they could be forgiven for looking for a miracle. </p>

<p>"I think there are going to be times when you're disappointed and things don't quite work out the way they would like.</p>

<p>"But people say they know there's going to be a reality check eventually, but they're going to relish living through what is a truly historic period.</p>

<p>"He managed to articulate hope and change but in language that was quite grounded and not hyperbole. </p>

<p>"Maybe sometimes we are too cynical. I've noticed people who are quite long in the tooth who have said they know there will be compromises along the way but let's enjoy it."</p>

<p>So, America has now raised the bar. We may have elected a female prime minister, but when we elect our first truly ethnic minority leader, only then will we know whether the freedom and opportunity that were the founding principles of the USA that left on the Mayflower ever sailed back to these shores. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Celebrity matters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/01/celebrity-squires.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.116876</id>

    <published>2009-01-17T22:44:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-17T23:49:18Z</updated>

    <summary> &quot;If you`re a man, you don`t have to worry about your manliness&quot; David Gest &quot;I think we&apos;re moving from this period when, if you like, celebrity matters, when people have become famous for being famous&quot; Gordon Brown...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="davidgest" label="David Gest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gordonbrown" label="Gordon Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/Gordoncolour.jpg"><img alt="Gordoncolour.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/assets_c/2009/01/Gordoncolour-thumb-221x166.jpg" width="221" height="166" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p><br />
"If you`re a man, you don`t have to worry about your manliness"<br />
 David Gest</p>

<p><br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/gestcolour.jpg"><img alt="gestcolour.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/assets_c/2009/01/gestcolour-thumb-221x166.jpg" width="221" height="166" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span></p>

<p></p>

<p>"I think we're moving from this period when, if you like, celebrity matters, when people have become famous for being famous"<br />
  Gordon Brown<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The root of all money</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/01/the-root-of-all-money.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.116873</id>

    <published>2009-01-17T20:53:15Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-18T11:52:07Z</updated>

    <summary> Someon once said, &quot;So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of all money?&quot; This week, one root (which is not to be confused with a green shoot...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="budget" label="budget" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="citycouncil" label="city council" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="liverpool" label="Liverpool" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Loveofmoney.jpg" src="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/Loveofmoney.jpg" width="240" height="320" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></span></p>

<p>Someon once said, "So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of all money?" This week, one root (which is not to be confused with a green shoot of recovery, by the way), was the council. Root of money, that is. And so the council's gifts were shaken from the wrath-bearing tree the city's money must grow on. </p>

<p>Friday saw the blooming of its latest budget and all its promises. When people's jobs are at risk, when bankers around the world are once again throwing themselves out of windows and under trains, when energy prices and train fares rocket and house prices continue to nosedive, there are better times to present to the people of Liverpool what you consider to be, via the first ever public consultation on how the city spends our money, the people's own answers to their own prayers.</p>

<p>Well, the ventriloquist put his hand in, and understandably, for the non-dummies out there, there was always the risk that would prove painful. </p>

<p>It's no surprise then, that there were a few whimpers. But the bangs, we were assured, included another £2.5 million on that most intangible of commodities, culture, which they say will build on the success of last year, once someone decides who will decide who will decide who will decide who will spend it, that is.</p>

<p>Another £1 million towards schools, £318,000 on neighbourhoods, £100,000 to badger the owners of decrepit buildings to get the paint brush and step ladder out, and £70,000 on a round-the-clock dog warden service. When people said they needed help to keep the wolf from the door, they may not have meant literally.</p>

<p>So, those were the bangs. The whimpers, critics said, would emanate from the chorus of shoppers, motorists, Sunday league footballers, kids at busy roads ... why, even the cost of dying is going up. Crematoria, with the clenched pillow of stricter green regulation poised to smother them, must raise an extra £80,000 a year. In short, the government wants the final disposal of the taxpayer to be as clean and untraceable as possible. A sinister thought, though not one to be met with surprise.</p>

<p>But councils will always find ways to that bit more. As we've heard, smokers alone have been made to cough up £100,000 in fines for dropping fag ends in the last year. At £75 a time, that's more than 1,300 people hit with fixed penalty notices. By the end of the pleading and disbelief, if it comes to fifteen minutes a time, that's 325 man hours. </p>

<p>One warden (a Ranulph, as I heard one referred to the other day) would have to endure three weeks of nonstop, nine-to-five verbal and, here and there, no doubt, physical abuse just to dish them out. The town hall has to ruin a lot of days for that little bit of extra cash, with which, incidentally, it could plant 2,500 trees. Albeit ones on which neither money, nor cigarettes, nor will corpses grow. </p>

<p>But as the first lady of finance and one of several scrambling to reach the highest branch, said this week: they can't just conjure it up out of nowhere. <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>When the circus comes to town ...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/2009/01/when-the-circus-comes-to-town.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk,2009:/hiddenagendas//927.115299</id>

    <published>2009-01-09T10:00:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-09T10:39:22Z</updated>

    <summary> Politicians are like buses. You wait for weeks for one to get back to you, and then dozens arrive at once. Gordon Brown and his troupe of ministers arrived in Liverpool on Wednesday to much ceremony and excitement, with...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Marc Waddington</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="capitalofculture" label="Capital of Culture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gordonbrown" label="Gordon Brown" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="liverpool" label="Liverpool" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="philredmond" label="Phil Redmond" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.liverpoolecho.co.uk/hiddenagendas/">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>Politicians are like buses. You wait for weeks for one to get back to you, and then dozens arrive at once. Gordon Brown and his troupe of ministers arrived in Liverpool on Wednesday to much ceremony and excitement, with his supporters hailing it all but the second coming, while the opposition ranks (the Lib Dems, made to feel like number two in their own manor) bemoaned the exorbitant cost of marshalling the event. </p>

<p>Of course, this is Gordon's second coming, in that sense, although there was nothing carnival-like about his last visit. Last time he came, in early September, he was in less than festive mood. The night before he was due to arrive, Charles Clarke, his former cabinet colleague, sounded off in the nationals and on the networks about the fact that Brown was practically a walking ghost with only months to live (or something like that, anyway). Even if most of us wrote it off as bitterness, Brown himself seemed to take it to heart, and his mood rippled through the droves of clipboard-wielding, ear-piece wearing hangers-on that descended on our fair city. Put it this way, should I as a journalist, trying to seek an answer, manhandle a politician, I would probably be felled by slugs of led. If some Central Office of Information PR-type were to grab my sleeve in order to stop me putting a question to the PM on behalf of the pubic (as happened last time), it would be a different matter. And it was.</p>

<p>So, awaiting the cabinet's arrival in the Pool, I nervously waited to see which disgruntled former colleague of his would put the mockers on the whole thing with some back-handed diagnosis of doom. But it never arrived, and when Gordon did, it all looked like passing off without incident.</p>

<p>That said, only those of privileged enough to be made to hang around outside in the freezing cold waiting for few words of wisdom from our elected representatives truly can appreciate the size of the circus that came to town this week. Anyone (the Lib Dems, that is) criticising the cost of policing the event should turn their attentions to the cost of getting the show on the road. You could be forgiven for thinking that the entire of Whitehall had boarded a train to come North on Wednesday, and with the ticket prices going up as they are, it'll have cost the public purse a pretty penny, no doubt. </p>

<p>Still, policing an event like this can't be a cheap affair. As I walked around the back of the Arena I saw three police horse boxes containing three long-faced horses, standing around kicking their heels and no doubt wondering what all the fuss was about. At what point, exactly, was the cavalry charge going to be necessary? This wasn't the G8,  and wasn't likely to see mobs of regional development types quango-ing mad over the shortage of canapés turn it into a riot. </p>

<p>Then, in the middle of the river, to my surprise I should see a police boat. Now, what exactly a boat (manned by police or not) could do should anything happen, I don't know. It didn't look as though it was armed with cannon or 48-inch guns, and, maybe I'm being too casual, but the chances there were marauding Somali pirates ranging off the coast of New Brighton looking for an opportunity to nab the prime minister seemed slim to me, but you never can be too sure.</p>

<p>Still, this was a big spectacle, and it all added to the sense of occasion. Brown himself, whose popularity has somehow recovered since the arse fell out of the economy, seemed to be lapping it up. This was his chance to return to Liverpool at the close of its Capital of Culture year and bask in the glory of what has undoubtedly been a huge success. And that he did.</p>

<p>But, the question on many lips was, whose circus is this, anyway? Whispers from within the city's Lib Dem administration suggested there was some disquiet at the way the Culture year had been "hijacked" and turned into a "New-Labour love-in". Really? Or was that just sour grapes? In all honesty, seeing the Lib Dems on the regional news decrying the cost of the cabinet visit at the end of a year in which there have been more than enough complaints from their ranks about the way the government had not paid enough attention to the city put the whole thing at risk of ending not with a bang, but with a whimper.</p>

<p>One of the things that really seems to have stuck in the craw of the administration is the way in which certain figures have been elevated to almost messiah status during the course of the latter half of 2008. In fairness, Phil Redmond has done well to raise the profile of the celebrations, and has been the only Scouse celebrity to really muck in and get his hands dirty. Others may have shown their faces occasionally, played a few concerts or, handed doled out a few back-slaps, but Redmond has been the only one that has gone the course.</p>

<p>However, so arrives the conflict and consternation. From some within the city's political scene (and not just the ruling administration, I might add), there have been some quiet moans and groans about the way that the events of the last few days have focused on Redmond's contribution, perhaps at the cost to that of others. For some within the city leadership, not enough attention has been paid to the contribution of all those who made the year the success it was. When some complain to me that the government has overlooked the input of the hundreds if not thousands of city servants who have kept the machine oiled, what am I to say? Certainly yesterday at the Arena, there was no mention of the city council at all, and I found it hard to suppress the mirth when I saw the sour faces of the handful of city leaders who were invited.</p>

<p>What we can't afford now is for the year to end on a flat note. There was a time when no-one wanted to touch the Capital of Culture with a bargepole, when, before 2008, it looked on the brink of ending up an unparalleled disaster. But, against all the odds, it was turned around and went off without incident, although there were, it has to be said, a few casualties along the way (some of whom can now be found in the recesses of the internet spewing vitriol at their former employers). </p>

<p>Sure, the government wasn't overly-inclusive in terms of recognising the wider contribution, but the 2008 circus suffered a distinct lack of high profile names mucking in, painting their faces and putting on their big shoes. If the adulation a celebrity like Redmond received from the government has put some big red noses out of joint, when you look at what others have done and said, I suppose you've got to be thankful. Who can forget Ringo Starr's proclamation that he wouldn't live here again if it was the last place on earth, or something to that effect? </p>

<p>Putting all the petty party politics that have peppered 2008 aside, that the government turned up at all and now wants to set up a British Capital of Culture is a vindication in itself, whether it lays the credit at the door of the municipal buildings or 10 Brookside Close. </p>

<p>Now, with the Brown carnival back on the road, the big-top taken down and the lions and tigers back in their cages, the question ahead of the next time the government descends on Liverpool is what we as a city will have done in the mean time worth shouting about, not who will take the credit. 2008 is over, the next challenge is to come up with something bigger and better, so we don't end up looking like maudlin clowns holding wilted yellow roses the next time the Brown circus comes to town. </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
