<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Living in Dialogue</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/fb-index.xml" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2011-06-29:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60</id>
    <updated>2014-08-04T02:32:28Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Anthony Cody spent 24 years working in Oakland schools, 18 of them as a science teacher at a high-needs middle school. A National Board- certified teacher, he now leads workshops with teachers on Project Based Learning. He is the co-founder of the Network for Public Education. With education at a crossroads, he invites you to join him in a dialogue on education reform and teaching for change and deep learning. </subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 5.2.7</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Six Years Under the Masthead: Farewell to Ed Week</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/08/six_years_under_the_masthead_f.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40927</id>
    <published>2014-08-03T17:33:08Z</published>
    <updated>2014-08-04T02:32:28Z</updated>
    <summary>This post marks my last appearance at Education Week, after six eventful years. The summer of 2008 was the beginning of Living in Dialogue, </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="education reform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        This post marks my last appearance at Education Week, after six eventful years. The summer of 2008 was the beginning of Living in Dialogue, 
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Trouble in Common Core City: Too Many Music Men, Not Enough Librarians</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/trouble_in_common_core_city_to.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40841</id>
    <published>2014-07-29T18:12:01Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-29T19:59:53Z</updated>
    <summary>Therefore, the Common Core project itself is also an exercise in fear-mongering about the future of our children, and has its own version of Professor Hill in its chief promoter, Bill Gates.  </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="college and career readiness" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="librarians" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="neoliberals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Therefore, the Common Core project itself is also an exercise in fear-mongering about the future of our children, and has its own version of Professor Hill in its chief promoter, Bill Gates.  
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>John Thompson: Oklahoma&apos;s Chief for Change Barresi in Trouble With Voters</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/oklahomas_chief_for_change_bar.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40710</id>
    <published>2014-07-22T14:15:54Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-22T18:19:54Z</updated>
    <summary>My experience this week helps explain why I believe we must take more time to celebrate our victories. If we can win in Oklahoma, victory is achievable anywhere and everywhere.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="exit exams" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="grassroots activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="standardized tests" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        My experience this week helps explain why I believe we must take more time to celebrate our victories. If we can win in Oklahoma, victory is achievable anywhere and everywhere.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Paul Horton: Will the Market Destroy Public Education?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/paul_horton_will_the_market_de.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40653</id>
    <published>2014-07-18T13:57:22Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-18T14:08:37Z</updated>
    <summary>Public schools and public teachers have been subjected to a relentless barrage of negative propaganda for almost thirty years. Many corporations want to force open education markets, Microsoft and Pearson Education to name two of the largest, demand &quot;free markets,&quot; &quot;choice,&quot; and &quot;free enterprise.&quot;</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="neoliberals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="privatization" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Public schools and public teachers have been subjected to a relentless barrage of negative propaganda for almost thirty years. Many corporations want to force open education markets, Microsoft and Pearson Education to name two of the largest, demand &quot;free markets,&quot; &quot;choice,&quot; and &quot;free enterprise.&quot;
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>John Thompson: Time to Kill the Testing Vampire</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/john_thompson_time_to_kill_the.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40615</id>
    <published>2014-07-16T15:19:28Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-16T17:09:31Z</updated>
    <summary>My three decades of experiences dealing with the crack and gangs era of the 1980s, and then teaching in inner city schools, taught me to have an even keel. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="education reform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="neoliberals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="social justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        My three decades of experiences dealing with the crack and gangs era of the 1980s, and then teaching in inner city schools, taught me to have an even keel. 
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Questioning Education Reformers&apos; Motives: The Big Taboo</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/questioning_education_reformer.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40557</id>
    <published>2014-07-13T21:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-13T23:36:20Z</updated>
    <summary>When Lyndsey Layton interviewed Bill Gates a few months ago, she violated one of the major taboos of the education reform discourse.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="conflicts of interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="journalism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="philanthropy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="privatization" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="segregation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        When Lyndsey Layton interviewed Bill Gates a few months ago, she violated one of the major taboos of the education reform discourse.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Response: The Real Story in Camden, N.J.</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/the_real_story_in_camden_new_jersey.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40513</id>
    <published>2014-07-11T14:57:00Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-11T15:00:35Z</updated>
    <summary>Laura Waters says that Camden, N.J., is finally addressing the needs of a school system that has failed families for decades.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Guest Blogger</name>
        
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Laura Waters says that Camden, N.J., is finally addressing the needs of a school system that has failed families for decades.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Paul Horton: The Technocrat&apos;s Revolution: Progressivism&apos;s Dark Side</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/paul_horton_the_technocrats_re.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40495</id>
    <published>2014-07-10T16:09:57Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-10T18:19:13Z</updated>
    <summary>Teachers need to wake up and understand that the country&apos;s biggest corporations are coming after their jobs. They have little respect for teachers because they want to market products that they think will do a better job than teachers.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="neoliberals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="social justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Teachers need to wake up and understand that the country&apos;s biggest corporations are coming after their jobs. They have little respect for teachers because they want to market products that they think will do a better job than teachers.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Charter School Networks and Shady Political Dealings: The Camden, N. J. Story</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/charters_school_networks_and_s.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40405</id>
    <published>2014-07-06T01:27:39Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-10T13:59:00Z</updated>
    <summary>Last week, while many of us were busy making plans for the summer, something much more sinister was happening in the halls of the State Capital in Trenton, N. J..</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Charter schools" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="conflicts of interest" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="grassroots activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="social justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Last week, while many of us were busy making plans for the summer, something much more sinister was happening in the halls of the State Capital in Trenton, N. J..
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>A Question for Bill Gates: How Can We Motivate Students When Their Futures Are Bleak?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/a_question_for_bill_gates_how_.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40383</id>
    <published>2014-07-03T13:58:32Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-03T14:58:46Z</updated>
    <summary>I am trying to make sense of the education reform project, which seems a mass of contradictions. On the one hand, we have a seemingly utopian project with bold pronouncements about the boundless capacity of all students </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="education reform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="neoliberals" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="philanthropy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="social justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="standardized tests" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        I am trying to make sense of the education reform project, which seems a mass of contradictions. On the one hand, we have a seemingly utopian project with bold pronouncements about the boundless capacity of all students 
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Gates&apos; Excuse for Poor Results of Educational Technology: &quot;Unmotivated Students&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/07/bill_gates_excuse.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40352</id>
    <published>2014-07-02T16:18:57Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-02T17:24:00Z</updated>
    <summary>If there is one thing Bill Gates has been a fan of, it is the role of technology in improving education. But recent comments show he may be starting to see that even technology may not be all powerful. And this leads to some deeper questions about the viability of the entire education reform project.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="education reform" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        If there is one thing Bill Gates has been a fan of, it is the role of technology in improving education. But recent comments show he may be starting to see that even technology may not be all powerful. And this leads to some deeper questions about the viability of the entire education reform project.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Common Core-Aligned Tests and the New Pearson GED: Failure By Design?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/06/common_core-aligned_tests_and_.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40316</id>
    <published>2014-06-30T23:06:49Z</published>
    <updated>2014-07-31T14:35:40Z</updated>
    <summary>If the pass rates on Common Core tests and the new Common Core-aligned GED plummet, it is because they were designed to do so. If there is an outcome that has been engineered, there must be a reason that outcome is desirable.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="GED" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="civil rights" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="standardized tests" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        If the pass rates on Common Core tests and the new Common Core-aligned GED plummet, it is because they were designed to do so. If there is an outcome that has been engineered, there must be a reason that outcome is desirable.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Protesters to Gates Foundation: &quot;Divest from Corporate Education Reform&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/06/protesters_to_gates_foundation.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40291</id>
    <published>2014-06-29T19:02:03Z</published>
    <updated>2014-06-29T21:24:53Z</updated>
    <summary>Bill Gates has it exactly upside down. The innovators are the classroom teachers. The innovators are the students. The innovators are the people working in the schools creating new things every day.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="grassroots activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="philanthropy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="standardized tests" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        Bill Gates has it exactly upside down. The innovators are the classroom teachers. The innovators are the students. The innovators are the people working in the schools creating new things every day.
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Michelle Gunderson: Teacher Union Conventions to Debate Common Core</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/06/michelle_gunderson_teacher_uni.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40204</id>
    <published>2014-06-24T21:34:42Z</published>
    <updated>2014-06-24T22:21:39Z</updated>
    <summary>This summer educators around the country will congregate in the political workings of our unions at the AFT and NEA conventions. This is no small business. </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Teacher unions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="grassroots activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="social justice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        This summer educators around the country will congregate in the political workings of our unions at the AFT and NEA conventions. This is no small business. 
		
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Is a High Stakes Moratorium Worth Embracing?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2014/06/is_a_high_stakes_moratorium_wo.html" />
    <id>tag:blogs.edweek.org,2014:/teachers/living-in-dialogue//60.40153</id>
    <published>2014-06-21T14:43:09Z</published>
    <updated>2014-06-21T16:28:36Z</updated>
    <summary>As a thought experiment, what would it look like if the Gates Foundation truly was attending to the research and evidence that is showing how damaging the new Common Core tests and high stakes accountability systems are? </summary>
    <author>
        <name>Anthony Cody</name>
        <uri>http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bill Gates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Common core standards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Congressional Hearings" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Gates Foundation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Local control" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="common core assessments" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="grassroots activism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="standardized tests" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="technocrats" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/">
        As a thought experiment, what would it look like if the Gates Foundation truly was attending to the research and evidence that is showing how damaging the new Common Core tests and high stakes accountability systems are? 
		
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>