This year, Americans will celebrate 250 years as a nation. Though we are a young nation compared to many others in the world, it is a significant milestone for this experiment in human government. Benjamin Franklin, the elder statesman of the Founding Fathers, is said to have once remarked when asked what he and his colleagues were creating, “A republic, if you can keep it.” We have kept it for two and a half centuries so far, and we pray that the freedoms we enjoy will continue for our children and grandchildren.

But celebration of these freedoms raises a question: How should Christians think about patriotism? In my book, I define patriotism as “love of country as manifested in loyalty, service to, and giving honor to one’s country.”¹ Does this sentiment align with faithful spiritual practice? Or is it at odds with a life devoted to Christ?

In this article, I offer four considerations to answer this question.

Table of contents

1. Love is not always a binary choice
2. Love of country is essential for Christian exiles
3. Love of country is an expression of gratitude
4. Love of country is limited
Conclusion
Resources for further reflection

1. Love is not always a binary choice

Jesus did say to his disciples, “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, and even his own life—he cannot be my disciple” (Luke 14:26). Was Jesus saying that his followers should abandon every other earthly and familial allegiance in order to follow him?

To the contrary, in Matthew 15:1–9 Jesus rebuked the Pharisees who abandoned the care of their parents through a loophole in which they dedicated that money to the temple instead. This violated the law of God, which says that children should “honor their father and mother” (Exod 20:12; cf. Eph 6:1–4). Jesus didn’t come to get rid of this good law but to fulfill it (Matt 5:17). Jesus himself, as he was dying on the cross for the sins of his people, took time to ensure that his mother’s welfare would be cared for by his best friend, John (John 19:26). What’s more, we are told in 1 Timothy 5:8 that to not care for our families is a sign that we have “denied the faith and are acting worse than an unbeliever.”

So clearly Jesus wasn’t saying that our loves, our allegiances, or our commitments are always binary, one versus the other. Jesus, instead, is talking about ordering our loves (ordo amoris). In Matthew 6:33, for instance, he urges his disciples to “seek first the kingdom of God” and “all these things will be provided for you” (emphasis added). These lesser commitments should not be the object of worship, but they do matter, as Jesus asserts in the surrounding context of Matthew 6.

This same principle should shape how we think about loving our country. If we love God well, we will love every other commitment in its proper way. In 1 Peter 2:17, we are told to “Honor everyone. Love the brotherhood. Fear God. Honor the Emperor.” This implies a hierarchy, an ordering. We only fear God, but we are to honor those whom God has sovereignly allowed to be put in power (Rom 13).

The fourth-century Church Father Augustine wrote that

living a just and holy life requires one to be capable of an objective and impartial evaluation of things; to love things, that is to say, in the right order, so that you do not love what is not to be loved, or fail to love what is to be loved, or have a greater love for what should be loved less, or an equal love for things that should be loved less or more, or a lesser or greater love for things that should be loved equally.²

Tim Keller is also helpful:

Don’t love anything less; instead learn to love God more, and you will love other things with far more satisfaction. You won’t overprotect them, you won’t over expect things from them. You won’t be constantly furious with them for not being what you hoped. Don’t stifle passionate love for anything; rather, redirect your greatest love toward God by loving him with your whole heart and loving him for himself, and not just for what he can give you. Then, and only then, does the contentment start to come.³

Consider the way we handle our other, lesser allegiances. In 2002, I stood at the altar of my Baptist church in the Chicago suburbs, nervously fidgeting while the pastor guided me through a set of commitments. I vowed—pledged allegiance—to Angela Sullivan. What the pastor didn’t say was that I had to choose between loving God and loving my soon-to-be wife. Instead, he said if we both put God first—if God was our highest allegiance—every other commitment would have its proper place.

If, for instance, I worshiped my wife, I would be expecting things from her that only God could provide. If I idolized my children, I would be a poor father, making demands of them and holding expectations that would crush them.

But if I love my wife and children in the proper ordering under my love for God, then I will love them in a proper way. It’s the same with our love of country. Patriotism becomes disordered only when we place it above our affection for God.

2. Love of country is essential for Christian exiles

Around 600 BC, Nebuchadnezzar conquered the people of Judah and took them captive to Babylon (Jer 20–29; 2 Kgs 24) in fulfillment of God’s prophecy against their idolatry and apostasy (Isa 39:5–7). Everything they knew—their country, their customs, their language, their roots—was gone. They found themselves in a strange land with very little agency or influence.

False prophets lied to them, telling them this sojourn would be short: Soon they’d escape this situation and have their nation restored. But Jeremiah came along and delivered both bad news and good news. The bad news was that they would be in Babylon for a while. Their children would grow up there. The good news was that God had a plan for them in exile.

This is the full context of that verse we often plaster on coffee mugs and calendars: “I know the plans I have for you …” (Jer 29:11). Jeremiah’s words were not a promise that you would find a convenient parking spot at Costco. They were a word God spoke to his people in the middle of one of the darkest chapters of their history.

But we should listen to God’s instructions for how they were to live while in Babylon: They were to seek the “well-being” or “welfare” of this city where they were exiled. The word here שָׁלוֹם (shalom) implies not merely the absence of conflict but holistic completeness. Consider what God was asking Israel to do here. The exiles were not only to survive Babylon; God called them to put down deep roots and actively work to improve the very nation that had conquered them.

Christians in America are not in the same situation as ancient Israel, but we are called “strangers and exiles” (1 Pet 2:11; Heb 11:13). We are citizens first of the kingdom of God (Phil 3:20). In many ways, the culture around us, even in America, seems foreign and at odds with the way of Christ (Jas 4:4).

Yet our status as exiles doesn’t mean we disengage from our temporary, earthly homes. In fact, Jeremiah’s words to God’s people can and should resonate with us. We should seek the welfare of the places where we live.

This can involve many things, but at the very least, it necessitates love for our nation. It is impossible to pursue the shalom of a nation we actively hate or loathe. This is why I believe patriotism is not just acceptable for a Christian but, properly ordered, is a Christian duty. Richard John Neuhaus went so far as to say it’s “a species of piety.”⁴

3. Love of country is an expression of gratitude

One of the most important postures for a Christian is gratitude. Hundreds of times in both the Old and New Testaments, we are commanded to give thanks. First Thessalonians says it is “the will of God in Christ Jesus concerning you” (1 Thess 5:18). Romans 1 makes the case that a lack of thankfulness was at the heart of Adam and Eve’s rebellion against God (Rom 1:21).

Patriotism is, at its heart, a lifting of our hearts toward God in gratitude for the place where he has sovereignly called us (Acts 17:26). Though America is far from perfect, it has given us much for which to thank God, including many freedoms and much prosperity. We have agency and influence that few people in human history have enjoyed.

G. K. Chesterton observed that patriotism allows us to practice the Christian virtues up close:

The fundamental spiritual advantage of patriotism and such sentiments is this: that by means of it all things are loved adequately, because all things are loved individually … Patriotism begins the praise of the world at the nearest thing, instead of beginning it at the most distant, and thus it insures what is, perhaps, the most essential of all earthly considerations, that nothing upon earth shall go without its due appreciation.⁵

Scripture tells us that we practice our love of God by loving others, especially those whom God has put nearest to us (1 John 4:20). So patriotism allows us to reflect God’s love for the world (John 3:16) by loving those close to us, including the culture, history, and traditions of our nation.

It is easy to grow indifferent to those things that are most familiar. We take our spouses, our children, our churches, and our friends for granted because they are all we happen to see—and what we see are their flaws. The same can happen with our country.

In my classes at Southwestern, I often teach immigrants and the children of immigrants. I’m regularly amazed at their love of America. Why? Because it’s not as familiar to them. Many have escaped totalitarian regimes or have heard their parents talk about the difficult conditions in the nations they have fled. America, to them, seems free and prosperous, a land of opportunity. This perspective facilitates a gratitude we can all learn from.

4. Love of country is limited

If we rightly order our loves, then we can love our country in the best possible way. Our citizenship in the kingdom of heaven reminds us that as good as America is, it is nothing compared to the future God plans for us in “that city whose builder and maker is God” (Heb 11:10 KJV).

This perspective injects some realism into our politics, helping us resist the futility and frustration of utopianism and allowing us to endure setbacks in the public square and elsewhere. It empowers us to see our neighbors as people to be loved, as sinners in the same need of grace as we are.

What’s more, a properly ordered patriotism resists looking at history through either a shaded or a jaded lens. When we worship America, we will tell our story in ways that whitewash the dark and difficult parts of our history. On the other hand, one can grow cynical, seeing the American project as irredeemably bad, as if our national sins are the only story to tell.

A right love of country helps us learn and tell the American story the way Scripture often tells the story of its flawed characters. Consider how Psalm 78 walks through Israel’s history, both narrating Israel’s sins and recounting her triumphs through God’s rescuing power.

This posture helps us separate patriotism from blind loyalty to a particular leader or administration. Patriotism does not mean we defend policies that are bad. In fact, genuine love of country should motivate us to speak up and speak out when we believe leaders or movements or laws are unjust and unwise. Chesterton is right. “‘My country, right or wrong,’ is something no patriot would think of saying.”⁶

Conclusion

As your family gathers this year to celebrate America’s 250th birthday, remember that loving the good things God has given you—including our country—is a proper Christian response.

As you pray for America’s future, pray that God will raise up faithful Christian citizens to share the good news of the gospel and love their neighbors as themselves. For it is through the faithful and courageous faith of God’s people that nations are blessed.

Share your thoughts

Does the Bible support patriotism? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further reflection

• Darling, Daniel. In Defense of Christian Patriotism: Equipping Believers for Political Theology, Civic Duty, and Love of Nation. Broadside Books, 2025.
• Neuhaus, Richard John. The Naked Public Square: Religion and Democracy in America. Eerdmans, 1984.

How to Be a Patriotic Christian: Love of Country as Love of Neighbor

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

God and Country: Upholding Faith, History, and National Identity

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

God and Government: An Insider’s View on the Boundaries Between Faith and Politics

Regular price: $11.99

Add to cart

Politics after Christendom: Political Theology in a Fractured World

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

America’s Religious History: Faith, Politics, and the Shaping of a Nation

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

What I Saw in America

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

The Four Loves (Audio)

Regular price: $16.99

Add to cart

How the Nations Rage: Rethinking Faith and Politics in a Divided Age

Regular price: $17.04

Add to cart

Related content

• What Does It Mean to “Render to Caesar”? | Michael Bird on Matthew 22:21
• Must Christians Submit to Government? | Kaitlyn Schiess on Romans 13:1–7
• Liberal Democracy & Jesus’s Command to Love Our Neighbors
• A Guide to Political Theology: Its Key Concepts and Perspectives
• Two Kingdoms, One King: What Two Kingdoms Theology Really Is

Too many churches have taken the prayer meeting back behind the barn and shot it. If those prayer meetings were like some I’ve been to, I’m sympathetic.⁷ I’m thinking of prayer meetings:

• Where much of the time was spent talking and too little of the time was spent praying.
• Where the focus was more on my name being hallowed, my kingdom coming, and my will being done, instead of God’s name, kingdom, and will.
• Where someone would start praying and then tediously meander through every topic under the sun.

But the solution to such prayer meetings is not a bullet. Quite the opposite. The solution is a resurrection.

Scripture makes plain from beginning (Gen 4:26) to end (Jas 5:16–18) that humble, desperate pleading with God is God’s means for great work. The spiritually powerful church is the praying church (e.g., Acts 2:42–47; 4:23–35). Let’s resurrect church prayer meetings.

In this article, I offer two solutions for doing so:

1. Change the content
2. Change the structure

1. Change the content

If anything needs a bullet behind the barn, it’s our misplaced priorities in prayer. Prayer meetings consumed with our (dis)comfort, our (un)ease, our health, and our interests will lack power and inevitably languish. We must change the content of our prayer meetings to align with God’s priorities.

We do this by taking our cues from the Lord’s Prayer (Matt 6:9–12). We do this by learning from the many exemplary prayers in Scripture.⁸ The more our hearts seek first his kingdom and his righteousness (Matt 6:32–33), the more powerful our prayer meetings will become.

There is no shortcut for this. It happens as we camp out in the Bible. It happens as we walk through this torn and tattered world with the Bible lighting our path. It happens as we come to know the heart of our God and let delight in him shape our whole orientation. Nonetheless, some practical and specific guidance is in order. I recommend including the following.

Begin with God

Start the prayer meeting by orienting people toward God. This involves praising God for his character and attributes or thanking God for his care and provision. Ways to do this include:

• Singing songs of adoration
• Assigning people to read a verse from Scripture about God
• Prompting people to use one word to complete the sentence, “God, you are [fill in the blank].”
• Encouraging people to identify what they are most grateful for in their personal lives, their church, and salvation history, and then voice those prayers of thanksgiving

Include confession

The Bible is saturated with prayers of confession. Our prayer meetings should be, too. Consider prompting people to confess personal sins, sins of your local church, sins of the universal church, and national sins. Ways to do this include:

• Using a passage to prompt examination (e.g., the fruits of the Spirit or the beatitudes)
• Mixing silent and voiced prayers of confession
• Allowing individuals to voice a brief confession and the whole group respond with a refrain (e.g., “Lord, have mercy”)

Lead intentionally

Make use of Logos’s Prayer Lists to track prayers for yourself and others. Start a free trial today!

Direct the petitions to align with God’s heart. Deliberate, focused leadership keeps petitions from drifting toward a plea for comfort and ease. Pray for various areas of your church: pressing needs, leaders, ministries, missionaries, and certain demographics (e.g., widows, marriages, children, shut-ins, singles). Keep in mind the Bible’s priorities, like the advance of the gospel, care for the marginalized and hurting, wisdom for governing officials, revival, justice, righteousness, and the day of the Lord. Practical ways to lead the time well include:

• Allowing a Scripture passage to guide prayers, working through it phrase by phrase.
• Dividing people into groups, each praying for a different ministry instead of having everyone pray for every area.
• Gathering around and laying hands on those being prayed for, such as church leaders or those facing acute needs.
• When praying for the lost, having individuals use a simple formula like, “For [name], who [short description]” with the group responding, “May they hear and believe the gospel.”
• Preparing more categories of petition than you’ll likely cover, allowing you to move at a brisk pace and follow what God’s Spirit is doing.

2. Change the structure

The Bible’s models of prayer display far greater variety than is often reflected in our prayer meetings. They include long and short prayers, sung and spoken prayers, individual and corporate prayers, prepared and spontaneous prayers, call and response prayers, and silent prayers. Our prayer meetings will be strengthened if we structure them to match this variety. As you prepare, seek to do the following:

Vary the lengths

Design your prayer meeting around varying lengths of prayers, always keeping in mind Jesus’s teaching on brevity (Matt 6:7–13). Consider mixing in one-word prayers, one- or two-sentence prayers, and longer prayers that might last a few minutes. Ways to do this include:

• Specifying the length when intending shorter prayers (e.g., “one-sentence prayers,” “brief prayers”) and repeating those instructions at least twice, including just before going to prayer.
• For longer prayers, assigning their specific topics to designated people (perhaps volunteers) so that there are a fixed number of people praying, each with a singular focus.
• Including responsive prayers in which the person praying says something short, but the whole prayer meeting responds with a set prayer (e.g., “Hear our prayer”).
• If doing something more complex like a responsive prayer, practicing the format once or twice before beginning so people aren’t distracted by it while praying.

Use different sources

Most prayer meetings depend almost exclusively on spontaneous prayers offered by those attending. While this is a good staple, there are other sources worth tapping into, e.g., songs, written prayers voiced together, and Scripture. Ways to do this include:

• Tying prayers to Scripture as much as possible. Encourage people to use Scripture throughout the prayer meeting. But don’t limit the use of Scripture solely to the prayers of Scripture (for example, set aside time for people to voice promises of God found in the Bible).
• Drawing on written prayers from sources like the Bible, a good hymnal, the Book of Common Prayer (1662), or The Valley of Vision. (Suggestion: Use the word “pray” rather than “recite” or “say” when introducing written prayers.)
• Transitioning smoothly into songs to maintain a posture of prayer. For example, announce that a time of prayer will close with a particular song, then simply begin singing it when the time comes. A cappella or minimal instrumentation works best.

Diversify groups

We strengthen our prayer meetings when we vary how we organize the groups praying. Have people pray on their own, in pairs, in small groups, or all together. Ways to do this include:

• Allowing time for silent reflection and prayer. (Repeatedly specify that the time will be silent: It can be embarrassing to pray aloud only later to realize it was meant to be a time of silent prayer.)
• Exploring creative ways to group people, e.g., splitting men and women, using tables or rows, or assigning topics to spots in the room and letting people choose where to go.
• When forming smaller groups, stating explicitly that participants don’t need to pray out loud, as some aren’t comfortable doing so.
• As a general rule, using the large group for shorter prayers and smaller groups for longer prayers.

Conclusion

Prayer meetings are fire. They have been since the founding of the church. Indeed, they have been since God first called a people to himself.

But some prayer meetings are more of a wet blanket. I think that’s because we don’t lead them well.

So take control of the content. Take control of the structure. Resurrect the church prayer meeting!

Share your thoughts

How can we lead prayer meetings well? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Further resources on prayer

Learning to Pray Topical Bundle

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

Praying with Paul: A Call to Spiritual Reformation

Regular price: $18.99

Add to cart

A Praying Church: Becoming a People of Hope in a Discouraging World

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

Only a Prayer Meeting

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

And the Place was Shaken: How to Lead a Powerful Prayer Meeting

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

When God Is Silent: Let the Bible Teach You to Pray

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

The 1662 Book of Common Prayer: International Edition

Regular price: $26.99

Add to cart

Related content

• 5 Steps to Starting a Prayer Ministry in Your Church
• What Is Prayer? Ways to Pray, Example Prayers & More
• Transform Your Prayer Life: 11 Essential Books on Prayer
• It’s Not Magic: Understanding the Power & Pattern of Prayer
• The Surprising Benefits of Prayer Books & How to Use Them

Since we no longer have the original manuscripts, is our text of the New Testament reliable? Given the magnitude of variations between manuscripts, can we reliably reconstruct the original? Premier New Testament text critic Daniel B. Wallace joins Kirk E. Miller on What in the Word? to discuss.

Dan provides an overview of the discipline of textual criticism and explains the methods critics use to determine the original text. The interview discusses the most common misconceptions about the New Testament’s reliability and why the sheer number of extant manuscripts actually gives us immense confidence.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Daniel B. Wallace

Daniel B. Wallace is the founder and executive director of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM), an organization dedicated to digitizing Greek New Testament manuscripts worldwide. He is Senior Research Professor Emeritus of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary, where he taught for thirty-seven years.

A leading expert in textual criticism, Daniel has authored or contributed to over a hundred publications and serves on the Committee on Bible Translation (CBT), which is responsible for the NIV. His widely used Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics is the standard intermediate-advanced Greek grammar in the English-speaking world and has been translated into half a dozen languages. He has lectured globally, contributed to numerous documentaries, and mentored over 150 students, many of whom are now working in top academic institutions around the world.

He and his wife Pati have been married for fifty-one years. They have four adult sons, two daughters-in-law, three granddaughters, and one grandson. He is a fourth-generation Californian and former body surfer from Newport Beach, CA.

Episode synopsis

Defining “reliability”

We can speak of the New Testament’s reliability in at least two ways.

1. Historical reliability: Did the events recorded in the New Testament actually happen? Can we trust that the New Testament provides a historically accurate account or record of what it presents?
2. Textual reliability: However, before asking whether what the New Testament says is true, can we even know what it originally said? Does the text of the New Testament, as we have it today, correspond to its original form?

This latter question is the domain of textual criticism and the topic of this particular episode. Dr. Daniel Wallace traces the origin of this question to Eden itself: “Did God actually say … ?” (Gen 3:1). The serpent sought to inject doubt about what God had said.

Textual criticism addresses this pre-apologetic question. Since none of the original New Testament manuscripts (i.e., autographs) survive, and the existing copies differ from one another, textual critics seek to work through the evidence to reconstruct the original wording.

Extant manuscripts

Extant manuscripts are surviving handwritten copies that we currently possess.

The New Testament has roughly 5,700 extant Greek manuscripts. In addition, we possess 8,000–10,000 Latin manuscripts, and thousands more across Coptic, Syriac, Armenian, Gothic, and other languages. In total, we have between 20,000 and 25,000 manuscripts that originate before the printing press, with the earliest fragments dating to within decades of composition. For perspective, the average classical author, in contrast, has around 15 surviving copies, with the earliest copy typically arriving 500 to 1,000 years after composition.

This vast number and variety of New Testament manuscripts—including Greek, but also its translations into other languages—aids our ability to reconstruct its original text.

Textual variants

A textual variant is any place where two or more manuscripts differ from one another in wording.

Across all New Testament manuscripts, the total number of textual variants reaches roughly 1.5 million, against a New Testament of about 138,000 words. That ratio—an average of ten variants per word—might sound like sheer chaos!

However, this sheer volume of variants exists precisely because we have an enormous number of manuscripts to compare. An ancient document with only a handful of surviving copies would show far fewer variants, not because our existing copies of it are more reliable, but because there’s simply less data to compare. More witnesses naturally produce more disagreements, even when those disagreements are trivial.

The vast majority of variants do not viably alter the meaning of the New Testament text. Dan categorizes variants into the following categories:

1. Spelling differences and nonsense errors. These make up most variants (roughly a million).
2. Viable but not meaningful. These are readings that could plausibly go back to the original but would not change the sense of the text whatsoever.
3. Meaningful but not viable. These readings would change the meaning—if original. However, they lack the evidence to be taken seriously.
4. Meaningful and viable. These are variants that both could be original and would matter if they were. By Dan’s generous estimate, this is less than one-tenth of 1 percent of all variants, around 1,500 in total.

That said, the number of genuinely contested readings amounts to only a dozen or two, and none of them threaten to change any major teachings of the Bible or core doctrines of the Christian faith.

Textual criticism

Textual criticism is the academic discipline of analyzing and comparing surviving manuscript copies in order to reconstruct the original wording of the text.

The fundamental principle employed by textual criticism is determining which reading most plausibly explains the rise of the others. Textual critics of the New Testament weigh two forms of evidence to do so:

• External evidence examines which manuscripts, versions, and Church Fathers attest to each reading, along with age, geographic spread, and quality of those “witnesses.”
• Internal evidence considers what a scribe would likely have done through transmission versus what the original author likely intended.

Typically, the more difficult reading is the more probable reading, since scribes are more likely to have introduced readings that smooth out difficulties than introduce them (apart from obvious transmission errors).

Popular misconceptions

Dan addresses some of the most common myths regarding the New Testament text.

1. The New Testament’s transmission is akin to the telephone game

New Testament copying wasn’t like the party game of degrading oral transmission. Scribes copied by sight (not ear) and could check their work (instead of hearing a whispered message just once). Furthermore, transmission didn’t happen along a single line (as in the telephone game). Multiple independent lines of transmission spread across the Mediterranean world. This dispersion, rather than weakening reliability, safeguards it: No single corrupting influence could contaminate all the copies.

2. Constantine chose the canon and invented Christ’s deity

Works like Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code popularized the claim that, at the Council of Nicaea, Emperor Constantine decided which books would belong in the New Testament and invented the doctrine of Christ’s deity. In reality, the canon had already been substantially settled before Nicaea—Constantine had nothing to do with determining it. Nor did he introduce the idea of Christ’s divinity. The council’s purpose was not to invent the doctrine but to define it with greater theological precision based on the New Testament manuscripts, which predate Constantine and already affirmed Christ’s divinity.

3. Modern translations have removed verses from the Bible

Some Christians worry that contemporary translations have removed material present in the King James Version (KJV). In reality, the KJV contains added, unoriginal material that lacks support in the oldest and most reliable manuscripts. The appearance of “missing” verses is an artifact of prior verse numbering.

4. Scribes corrupted the text to support later doctrines

Scribes are sometimes accused of altering the text for theological reasons, for instance, to manufacture doctrines like the Trinity (an interpolation in 1 John 5:7–8) or to erase Christ’s stated ignorance of his return (“nor the Son”; Matt 24:36). However, as Dan points out, these truths are still taught elsewhere in the New Testament.

5. Without the autographs, we can’t meaningfully speak of the original text

Finally, sometimes folks claim that since we do not have the original autographs of the New Testament, we cannot meaningfully speak of its original text (e.g., its inspiration, infallibility, or inerrancy). However, as Dan contends, losing the original manuscripts doesn’t mean losing the original text of those manuscripts. It just means that scholars must reconstruct that original text from the available copies that transmit it.

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

Are we able to reconstruct the New Testament text? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Daniel B. Wallace’s recommended books on New Testament textual criticism

• Charles L. Quarles, New Testament Textual Criticism for the 21st Century: A Practical Guide.

The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration, 4th ed.

Regular price: $67.99

Add to cart

Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism

Regular price: $27.99

Add to cart

Daniel B. Wallace’s select bibliography on New Testament textual criticism

The following are arranged in order of relevance and accessibility for a lay audience. The first five are especially valuable.

• Daniel B. Wallace, “Textual Criticism of the New Testament” in The Lexham Bible Dictionary.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “The Reliability of New Testament Manuscripts” in the ESV Study Bible (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008) 2587–89.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “How Badly Did the Early Scribes Corrupt the New Testament? An Examination of Bart Ehrman’s Claims” in Contending with Christianity’s Critics, ed. Paul Copan and William Lane Craig (Nashville: B&H, 2009), 148–66.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “Inerrancy and the Text of the New Testament: Assessing the Logic of the Agnostic View” in Evidence for God: 50 Arguments for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science, edited by William A. Dembski and Michael L. Licona (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2010), 211–19.
• Lee Strobel, “Challenge #2: The Bible’s Portrait of Jesus Can’t Be Trusted Because the Church Tampered with the Text” (interview with D. B. Wallace) in The Case for the Real Jesus (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2007): 65–100.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “The Reliability of the New Testament Manuscripts” in Understanding Scripture: An Overview of the Bible’s Origin, Reliability, and Meaning, edited by Wayne Grudem, C. John Collins, and Thomas Schreiner (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2012), 111–20.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “Has the New Testament Text Been Hopelessly Corrupted?” in In Defense of the Bible (Nashville: B&H, 2013), 139–63.
• Daniel B. Wallace, “Lost in Transmission: How Badly Did the Scribes Corrupt the New Testament Text?” in Revisiting the Corruption of the New Testament: Manuscript, Patristic, and Apocryphal Evidence, ed. Daniel B. Wallace; volume 1 of Text and Canon of the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2011).
• Daniel B. Wallace, “Foreword” to Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism, ed. Elijah Hixson and Peter Gurry (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2019).
• Cover story, “Daniel Wallace: The Worshipful Call to Learning, Teaching, and Learning Again,” by Neil Coulter, DTS Magazine, Fall 2022 (vol 8.3): 17–19.
• “Manuscript Detective,” DTS Magazine, Fall 2022 (vol 8.3): 20–21.

Related content

• What Is Textual Criticism of the Bible? A Crash Course
• How Textual Critics Reconstruct the Bible’s Text: 6 Key Principles
• “Only Begotten God”? 9 Ways to Translate John 1:18
• “The Earliest Manuscripts Do Not Have …”: How to Preach Mark 16 & John 8
• How the Dead Sea Scrolls Changed Our Bibles: 3 Exciting Examples

Two trees once lived on my property. Both are no longer there.

The first was a loblolly pine over twenty feet tall. On the night of December 5, 2002, there was a terrible ice storm in North Carolina where I live. A deluge of freezing rain covered everything with a thick coat of ice. Loblolly pine trees have branches way up high and a very shallow root system. As soon as the ice made it top heavy, down it came.

A few years later, I received the gift of an apple tree, a little sapling. I studied how to plant it, dug the hole, planted the tree, watered it, and waited, dreaming of fruit for years to come. But within a few short weeks, the green leaves on the sapling had withered and soon the tree was dead. The place I had chosen was not ideal for apple trees. The root system never developed, and the tree never bore fruit.

Both trees died because of their inadequate root systems.

By contrast, Psalm 1:1–3 speaks of the blessed person who meditates on God’s Word day and night: such a one “is like a tree planted by streams of water which yields its fruit in season and whose leaf does not wither. Whatever he does prospers.” What a beautiful picture of stability and fruitfulness! Through its proximity to an endless supply of life-giving water, the tree does what it was designed by God to do: stand upright and bear fruit. The stunning promise of that Psalm glows in my heart day after day: “Whatever he does prospers!” And the key to this spiritual prosperity is continuous meditation on the Word of God.

One primary way we can do this is by memorizing Scripture.

Why should one memorize Scripture?

I want to exhort you, dear friend, to give yourself to a lifetime of Scripture memorization. Do not memorize only a few favorite verses. Certainly, you can start there! But I want you to think about making this a habit you continue to do until God calls you to heaven.

Scripture is soul-bread, and bread is life. Deuteronomy 32:47 says of the Scriptures, “They are not just idle words for you—they are your life.” When tempted by the devil in the desert, Jesus says, “Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God” (Matt 4:4). For Jesus, Scripture is for the soul what food is for the body. Paul says that the faith that saves our souls comes from hearing the message about Christ (Rom 10:17). Faith in Christ must be fed daily by the Word of God, so Paul said, “Let the Word of Christ dwell in you richly” (Col 3:16). How can the Word “dwell in us richly”? Memorization is a powerful answer!

We also memorize because of the importance of our thought life. If we want to live a life pleasing to God, we must live according to his Word. But before every good deed is a good thought, and all good deeds and good thoughts are first defined and commanded by the Word of God. If we are to be transformed from a life of sin to a life of godliness, we will be transformed by the renewing of our minds, and that happens only by a constant saturation in the Word of God (Rom 12:1–2).

Satan knows how important our thought lives are. He is constantly assaulting our minds with tempting thoughts that must be taken captive and made obedient to Christ (2 Cor 10:5). Scripture memorization enables us to abide constantly on what is true, noble, right, pure, lovely, admirable, excellent, and praiseworthy (Phil 4:8) instead of the corrupting “lust of the flesh, lust of the eyes, and boastful pride of life” (1 John 2:16).

Negatively, we memorize Scripture because of how prone we are to forget it. Tragically, throughout the history of our sinful human race, we have shown how consistently we forget God and his Word. James talks about the individual who looks at his face in a mirror and then goes away and immediately forgets what he looks like. By contrast, God wants us to look intently into the perfect law that gives freedom, not forgetting what we have heard but doing it—in that way we will be blessed in everything we do (Jas 1:25).

In John 15, Jesus likens the Christian life to a branch abiding (dwelling, remaining, living) in a vine. Like our earlier image of root systems, this connection with the vine constantly gives the branch everything it needs to bear fruit. So Jesus said, “If you remain in me and my words remain in you, ask whatever you wish and it will be given to you. This is to my Father’s glory, that you bear much fruit, showing yourselves to be my disciples” (John 15:7–8). Christ’s words abide/dwell/remain in us when we have them memorized and continually review them. Then we pray, bear fruit, glorify God, and prove our status as true disciples.

How can one memorize Scripture?

For over forty years, I have devoted myself to memorizing whole books of the Bible. I started in the summer of 1986 with Ephesians while sitting on a bench in Kenya waiting for a bus to Nairobi. Since that time, I have memorized a total of forty-five books of the Bible.

There are countless ways to go about memorizing Scripture, and many practical “tips” and “hacks” and mnemonic techniques people have developed. But when all is said and done, I see no substitute for repetition over time. Until we do that, the word stays at a temporary place in our brains, easily fading as soon as we give our attention to something else.

My approach has developed into these steps:

1. Choose a passage to memorize.
2. Read the verse out loud ten times.
3. Look away from the Bible and recite the verse ten times.
4. The next day, recite the verse ten times again.
5. Recite the verse for one hundred consecutive days.
6. At the end of the hundred days, kiss the verse goodbye so you can memorize more verses.
7. Repeat this pattern for every verse you memorize.

Some may question step 6, hoping to retain all of the memorized verses forever. The problem is that there is a limit to what any of us can retain, and I want to challenge you to memorize new Scripture as a habit for the rest of your life. Should you do so, at some point you will reach a maximum saturation level. The sheer quantity of verses will threaten to overwhelm you, and you will be tempted to give up entirely. I would prefer that you commit to a pattern of learning new Scriptures till the end of your days. Then you will see Christ face to face and will be taught by God directly! (John 6:45).

Create custom Passage Lists in Logos to practice memorizing.
Try it today for free!

What Scripture should one memorize?

People who are not presently memorizing Scripture need to start somewhere. The best place to start is with key texts that will be immediately helpful to you—famous verses that everyone should know. Search the cyber world with the query, “Top ten verses to memorize” and you will quickly get a starter kit. Maybe you’ll start with John 3:16 or some verses on the famous Romans Road (Rom 1:16; 3:23; 5:8; 6:23; 8:1). The Navigators’ “Topical Memory System” is where I started, and they have their own recommended starting places.

However, I want to advocate that once you get used to the discipline of Scripture memorization as a lifestyle, you move on to memorizing whole books of the Bible. Why? Because “All Scripture is God-breathed and useful” (2 Tim 3:16) and “Man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of God” (Matt 4:4). Memorizing a whole book will help ensure you understand every verse in its context and also enable you to follow the logical flow of the reasoning in every chapter. Finally, it will open your eyes to hidden gems, verses that are not as famous, but which will hit you in powerful ways and shape your soul for the glory of God.

To do this, you may also want to increase your pace. To get through longer books, I memorize three verses per day, altering the pattern I described above in this way:

1. Read today’s first verse ten times out loud.
2. Recite it ten times from memory.
3. Read today’s second verse ten times out loud.
4. Recite it ten times from memory.
5. Read today’s third verse ten times out loud.
6. Recite it ten times from memory.
7. Recite all three verses ten times from memory.

The next day:

1. Recite yesterday’s three verses ten times from memory. (Glance at the Bible to refresh your memory, as needed.)
2. Then, do steps 1–7 for the next three verses.
3. Recite all the verses you learn for one hundred days.
4. Kiss each of them goodbye in turn, once you’ve completed their hundred days.

In this way, you can learn whole books like Ephesians, Ruth, or even longer books like the Gospel of John.

What are the benefits to memorizing Scripture?

There are so many benefits to a lifetime of memorization. Here are two that have glowed in my heart for a few years:

1. Insight

New ideas, thoughts, concepts, and understandings that come during my hundred days are more precious than gold or diamonds to me. The Holy Spirit will bless your mind with stunning new thoughts by illuminating these verses, showing you things that have always been there but that you may have never seen before. Those insights will electrify you and show you how “living and active” God’s Word really is (Heb 4:12).

2. Intimacy

God wants us to draw near to him in a loving relationship. By means of the Word of God, I learn more and more about his infinite love for me in Christ and his unfathomable grace. The Word of God speaks to me directly by the Spirit and tells me of his presence, his greatness, his wisdom, and his tender affection for me in Christ. Nothing that this world has to offer can compare with that.

Conclusion

This journey of Scripture memorization will be one of the most challenging and laborious works you may ever begin. It will try you, test you, and sometimes exhaust you. The weakness of our minds and proneness to forget may discourage you.

But I promise you this: If you invest in this habit, you will never regret it. It will enable you to develop a deep root system that will make you stable in storms, vibrant in drought, and fruitful in Christ for all eternity. On Judgment Day, when our Lord evaluates everything you have done in the body, good and bad (2 Cor 5:10), you will have cause to regret many poor choices and wasted time in your earthly pilgrimage. But you will never regret a minute you spent hiding God’s Word in your heart!

Share your thoughts

What are the best ways to memorize Scripture? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further reflection

An Approach to Extended Memorization of Scripture

Regular price: $0.99

Add to cart

How to Memorize Scripture for Life: From One Verse to Entire Books

Regular price: $7.99

Add to cart

Memorizing Scripture: The Basics, Blessings, and Benefits of Meditating on God’s Word

Regular price: $8.44

Add to cart

Topical Memory System: Hide God’s Word in Your Heart

Regular price: $13.19

Add to cart

Scripture by Heart: Devotional Practices for Memorizing God’s Word

Regular price: $15.99

Add to cart

Hide This in Your Heart: Memorizing Scripture for Kingdom Impact (Audio)

Regular price: $14.99

Add to cart

Related content

• Ascending the Ladder: A Guide to the Ancient Practice of Lectio Divina
• Want to Open the Door to Revival? Open the Word of God.
• How to Fast for God: What Fasting Is, Why It Matters & More
• What Does It Mean to “Apply” the Bible?
• 5 Keys to a Fruitful Catechism Class

My doctorate came with a diploma—and imposter syndrome.

Imposter syndrome is the feeling of being a fraud, undeserving of your achievements. At any given moment the shoe is going to drop, and you’ll be exposed. It doesn’t help that you have an advanced degree, have produced research, or hold a role in an academic setting. Your self-talk has you convinced that this is all illegitimate: Your doctoral supervisors let you slip by, your research was fraught with mistakes, and your university hired you unaware of all of this. Everyone seems to have the wrong idea, an exaggerated idea, of your skills and accomplishments. You may even get to the point of resenting those who have offered you opportunity along the way. How could they hire such a phony as yourself!

Here’s the punchline: Another achievement doesn’t make it go away. If anything, you’re bound to feel worse as they grow. The agony of carrying this “secret” is you end up putting in twice the work so no one finds out!

Imposter syndrome isn’t just limited to those at the height of their craft. Imposter syndrome affects around 25–30 percent of high achievers.⁹ Studies have shown that around 70 percent of adults will be affected by imposter syndrome at some point in their lives.¹⁰ I’ve hired my fair share of adjuncts, even full-time professors, and it is more common than not to hear insecurity from the individual over their capabilities.

I’m no different. When I first started off in the classroom, I was given a Greek III course to teach. It didn’t matter that my graduate degree was in exegetical theology or that I had produced three devotionals from the Greek. I kept thinking, “The students will not get their money’s worth so long as I am the professor!” That led to concern over what the accreditors would do if they found out that I was the professor. It was all irrational, but that is the nature of imposter syndrome.

What causes imposter syndrome?

Imposter syndrome is not in the DSM. It is a shorthand term that refers to a pattern of thinking. It is not a clinical mental disorder. There is no one cause for imposter syndrome, though there are key factors which contribute toward it.

1. You face new challenges

For a seminary student, this often occurs at the entrance and outset of the program. The thought of actually learning what all those squiggly lines known as Hebrew are, or marching through the prose of the Desert Fathers, seems good and great for everyone else except themselves. Or perhaps the thought of a doctor of ministry degree seems overwhelming. Everyone has heard nightmare stories about dissertation writing. It just doesn’t seem to be in the cards for them, even though those who have completed doctorates before were no different.

2. Your social world shifts

Imposter syndrome can develop as your sphere of relationships changes, as such change can make you feel as though you’ve gone from being the big fish in the small pond to the small fish in the big pond. Nothing has this effect quite like seminary. With seminary come people who think about the same thing you have been thinking about (i.e., the Bible), but differently. Much is unfamiliar, from different traditions to fresh lenses to new terminology.

I’ll never forget a discouraged pastor who decided to restart his education saying to me, “How come everyone here knows what filioque means except for me?” It can be daunting to think you’ve missed something important along the way, and for high achievers this can call everything into question, including one’s own competence and skill.

3. Your standards work against you

If you hold yourself to a particular standard and a change or transition alters your ability to meet that standard, you could certainly develop imposter syndrome.

As an exacting person, I need all the details. I am a Fact Finder on the Kolbe Exam, and for me to meet my own standards of satisfaction, I need to understand all the details. No wonder I felt inadequate to teach Greek when my own understanding of constative vs. ingressive vs. culminative aorist was a bit hazy. If I don’t have that down pat, well, I certainly should not be teaching the present active indicative!

If imposter syndrome goes unchecked, it can lead to perfectionism, people-pleasing, low self-esteem, and self-deprecation beyond humor. After my thesis was published and people began to purchase it, I quickly let them know where the research still made me hesitant and even went so far as to tell someone I wouldn’t blame them if they used it as a doorstop. Six years of work as a doorstop. Needless to say, imposter syndrome is an ugly complex.

How does the Bible speak to imposter syndrome?

Obviously, Paul did not write to the churches to address imposter syndrome, and the narratives in the Old Testament weren’t intended to make us all feel better about going to seminary. But I do think Scripture can be applied to the corners of our lives where we need wisdom and encouragement from the Holy Spirit.

For those of us with imposter syndrome, Matthew’s Gospel is particularly reassuring. Matthew shows us that none of us have all of our ducks in a row before God starts using us.¹¹

Throughout Matthew’s narrative, Jesus empowers the disciples for service, giving them authority over demons, the ability to heal the sick, and provision for their needs (Matt 10:1, 5–15). In spite of all this, they fail to feed the multitudes on two occasions (Matt 14:16–17; 15:33), they can’t cast out a demon from a possessed boy (Matt 17:16), and they are crippled with fright by a storm (Matt 14:22–33). In addition to all of this, they never quite seem to understand the identity of Jesus (Matt 16:21–23). It appears the only thing they get right is fetching a donkey for Jesus (Matt 21:6–7)!

But there’s a thread woven through the entire narrative that we shouldn’t miss. Matthew refers to Jesus’s twelve as “his disciples” twenty-four times. Perhaps this is irony at play. What sustained and upheld the disciples was not their own perfection or skill. It was the grace of the Lord that came through his calling them.

The starting point of working through imposter syndrome is to remember the grace of God. We are where we are because the Lord has called us and has given us grace. Ultimately, where we are has more to do with his abundant faithfulness and mercy than whatever standard we might have set for ourselves. Humbling as that reality is, it is one we must all keep in mind wherever we find ourselves, whether student, faculty member, or administrator. All of this is done unto the Lord and through the Lord.

How can we address imposter syndrome?

As we center the grace of the Lord in our lives, there are other practical steps we can take to overcome imposter syndrome. I have found the following helpful over the years.

1. Be kind to yourself

In his book The Psychology of the Fruit of the Spirit (Zondervan, 2022), Zoltán Dörnyei suggests that kindness is an outworking of love demonstrated through caring actions. Such kindness is a fruit of the Spirit and an active expression of God’s character.

While we express kindness toward others, kindness also applies to how we ought to treat ourselves. This can look like allowing yourself room to make mistakes, or even distrusting the self-talk that attempts to defeat you.

2. Find a mentor

The truth is that all of us, no matter how advanced we are in our craft, still have room to learn. We must find a healthy place for this. Depending on ourselves to fill whatever gaps we perceive in ourselves will lead to frustration.

It serves us well to surround ourselves with those we desire to learn from and allow them to guide us into growth. They will do a better job of pointing out our blind spots and can lend wisdom and experience we don’t yet have. A mentor who can lead us into growth far outweighs being driven to growth by negative self-talk and insecurity.

3. Journal your growth

Prayer includes bringing our petitions before God. Journaling enables us not only to bring our requests to God but to keep track of them so that we can register our growth.

A well-kept journal becomes a testimony of growth over time, and in moments where we feel we lack, we can look back over the journal to see how we have grown and note how God’s grace is sustaining us.

In conclusion

Imposter syndrome is a real phenomenon that much of the population will at some point experience, especially those in seminary. There are no quick fixes to this, but with the grace of God and sustained spiritual discipline we can develop full confidence that God upholds us to fill the role he has placed us in—despite all our imperfections.

Share your thoughts

How should we navigate imposter syndrome? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Related content

• 3 Misguided Narratives About Success in Seminary
• Your Grades Don’t Define You: Addressing Academic Anxiety & Depression
• Facing Doubt in Seminary: How to Grow Through Uncertainty
• 5 Ways to Prevent Pastoral Burnout

Does Paul prefer Christians remain single, despite the rest of the Bible’s positive portrayal of marriage? In this episode of What in the Word?, Kirk E. Miller sits down with Dr. Danielle Treweek to walk through numerous difficulties in 1 Corinthians 7. For instance, does Paul teach that some receive a special Spirit-empowerment to remain single? What is the “present distress”? And what does it mean for married couples to live as though they are not? Treweek seeks to identify our common assumptions about the text to uncover Paul’s vision for whole-hearted, Christian devotion, whether single or married.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Danielle Treweek

After graduating from Moore Theological College and serving in women’s ministry at a church in Sydney, Danielle Treweek completed a PhD focusing on a theology of singleness. Dani is the founding director of Cross Related, works part-time as the Sydney Anglican Diocesan Research Officer, and spends the rest of her time writing, reading, speaking, and training on singleness, sexuality, church community, and more. Her book, The Meaning of Singleness (InterVarsity Academic, 2023) was the 2024 Australian Christian Book of the Year and her new book, Single Ever After (Good Book, 2025) was released in September 2025. She loves the musical Les Misérables, a good cup of chai, and making her nephew and niece laugh.

• X
• Instagram
• Link

Episode synopsis

The context of 1 Corinthians 7

First Corinthians 7 is part of Paul’s extended discussion about how the gospel reshapes embodied relationships, especially sexual ethics (see 1 Cor 5–6, just prior). So Paul concludes chapter 6, “You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body” (1 Cor 6:19–20).

Although we often think of 1 Corinthians 7 as “the singleness passage,” Dr. Danielle (Dani) Treweek points out that this passage has as much to do with marriage. In fact, the word “single” doesn’t actually exist in the passage in the original Greek. Modern translations, like the ESV (see also NRSVue, NIV, NLT, etc.), add the word “single” in 1 Corinthians 7:8 following the Greek verb for “remain.” The categories Paul operates with here are simply either married and unmarried (including its further subcategories like betrothed and widows). This matters because Paul is not introducing “singleness” as a lifestyle but simply as a present marital state (i.e., unmarried). In fact, our word “singleness” is only about five hundred years old.

The difficulties of 1 Corinthians 7

This passage contains numerous complexities.

First, the passage contains a litany of exegetical difficulties. Not only must we consider how Paul gives his instructions (e.g., “as a concession, not a command” [1 Cor 7:6]; “I, not the Lord” [1 Cor 7:12; cf. 7:10]; “I have no command from the Lord, but I give my judgment” [1 Cor 7:25; see also 7:40]) but also what he instructs, which is often quite debated and difficult to discern here.

Second, we face difficulties bridging the gap between our contexts and first-century Corinth’s. Ancient Corinth operated under rather different assumptions about marriage, sexuality, and household structure than we do today. For example, in the twenty-first century West, marriages are based on personal agency and desire. In ancient Corinth, marriages were primarily determined based on the interests of the household.

Third, Dani suggests that our theological baggage often greatly affects how we read this passage. Much of our confusion comes not from the text itself, but from theological assumptions we bring to it. Our pre-existing theology of marriage tends to determine at the outset what we believe the passage can and cannot be saying, making it difficult for us to hear the text on its own terms.

Does Paul prefer singleness (1 Cor 7:6–7)?

In 1 Corinthians 7:6–7, Paul says—not as a command but as a concession—that he wished all were like himself, i.e., single/unmarried. Paul gives his judgment that widows will be “happier” if they stay unmarried (1 Cor 7:40). So does Paul prefer singleness over marriage?

Dani clarifies: Paul is not ranking singleness as morally superior to marriage. Paul holds both states as genuinely good. Yet he recognizes something uniquely fitting about singleness for the specific moment we occupy in redemptive history, between Christ’s first and second comings. Paul’s preference is not because singleness is holier but because it is especially suited for the “already/not yet” in which we live.

Is there a gift of singleness (1 Cor 7:6–7)?

As Paul goes on to explain, “But each has his own gift from God, one of one kind and one of another” (1 Cor 7:7).

Some take Paul to refer here to a spiritual gift of singleness: a special, supernatural empowerment given to select Christians which enables them to exercise the necessary self-control (see 1 Cor 7:9) and so remain celibate. The word for “gift” (χάρισμα) here is one Paul later uses to refer to spiritual gifts in 1 Corinthians 12.

However, as Dani points out, nowhere does such a “gift of singleness” appear in Scripture. Rather, she maintains that the gift in view is simply one’s situation, either currently being married or presently finding oneself unmarried. Both states, in their own way, are gifts from God. The “gift” that is singleness, then, is not an irrevocable, forever-assignment to remain such, but a present condition that may change.

The practical stakes here are notable. If singleness requires a special supernatural empowerment, then unmarried Christians who haven’t received that gift—but who also haven’t found a marriage partner—are left, as Dani puts it, in “no man’s land.” They’re told they shouldn’t be single without the gift, yet God hasn’t supplied it, raising troubling questions about whether God is withholding from them what they need to live faithfully. To the contrary, the indwelling Holy Spirit who is at work transforming all believers into Christ’s likeness is sufficient for living faithfully, whether married or single. There’s no need for some additional booster shot reserved for the spiritually elite.

Burning and a lack of self-control (1 Cor 7:8–9)

Most modern versions translate πυρόω in 1 Corinthians 7:9 as “burn with passion.” πυρόω can mean to “burn with sexual desire”¹² However, it often simply means “to burn,” that is, “to cause to be on fire.”¹³ If 1 Corinthians 7:9 carries the latter meaning, Paul is presumably warning about the fires of eschatological judgment. However, in either interpretation, the outcome is the same, since the burning of lust leads to the burning of judgment.

Of more consequence, though, is how one interprets Paul’s remark, “If they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry” (1 Cor 7:9). Some take this to refer to a forward-looking self-assessment: If you anticipate you won’t be able to exercise the self-control to remain abstinent, get married instead.

However, the Greek participle for “exercise self-control” is present. Thus, according to Dani, this phrase should be translated, “If they are not [presently] exercising self-control.” On this reading, Paul is not asking the unmarried Corinthians to forecast their future willpower. Rather, he’s addressing people who are currently engaged in sexual immorality. (Consider the Corinthian context where freeborn men would typically have sex with prostitutes and household slaves.) Paul’s point is not, Discern whether you’re cut out for lifelong singleness, but, Stop pretending sexual immorality is compatible with godly singleness. If you can’t control yourself, marriage is better than burning.

What is the “present distress” (1 Cor 7:26)?

In 1 Corinthians 7:26, Paul clarifies that his counsel is owing to the “present distress.” If Paul is referring to some specific crisis in first-century Corinth, might his instructions regarding singleness be limited to those specific set of circumstances? For instance, some modern scholars have alleged a famine in the region or an illness connected to misuse of the Lord’s Supper (1 Cor 11:30). However, such interpretations are quite novel. Early Christian writers and the Reformers read this “distress” as referring to the end-time tribulations of this age.

Yet regardless of the identity of this “distress,” Paul explains his meaning in 1 Corinthians 7:29: “This is what I mean …” Whatever the local circumstances, Paul frames the distress eschatologically, as characteristic of this age between Christ’s resurrection and return: “The appointed time has grown very short.”

This eschatological framework serves as the interpretive key for Paul’s puzzling instructions that follow (1 Cor 7:29–35).

How are the married to live as if unmarried (1 Cor 7:29–31)?

Paul’s exhortation that those with wives should “live as though they had none” could seem contradictory. Yet Paul can’t be telling married people to pretend they’re unmarried or to abandon their spouses, since he’s already forbidden that earlier (1 Cor 7:12–13). But what, then, does it mean to live as if unmarried?

Dani highlights Paul’s parallel examples: mourn as though not mourning, rejoice as though not rejoicing, buy as though possessing nothing. None of these means ceasing the activity altogether. Rather, they mean, Engage these things in a way suitable to our eschatological moment. “The appointed time has grown very short” (1 Cor 7:29); “the present form of this world is passing away” (1 Cor 7:31).

Paul goes on to explain what this looks like in 1 Corinthians 7:32–35.

Are the married to be less devoted (1 Cor 7:32–35)?

In 1 Corinthians 7:32–35, Paul contrasts the “undivided” devotion of the unmarried with the divided attention of the married, who are said to be anxious about “how to please” their spouse.

A common reading treats this as Paul granting married people a kind of exemption: They simply can’t be as devoted to the Lord because marriage legitimately divides their attention. Dani critiques this interpretation, noting that it contradicts the rest of the New Testament which teaches that Christians—married or not—are to be wholly devoted to Christ. Besides, is not fulfilling one’s marital responsibilities part of obedience (devotion) to Christ for those who are married?

Instead, Dani argues, Paul calls married believers to live out their marriages the way unmarried believers live: undivided in devotion to the Lord, not consumed by worldly concern. So when Paul speaks of “pleasing” one’s spouse, he does not mean something positive, like loving or serving them. Rather, it is contrasted with living to “please the Lord” (e.g., Paul likewise contrasts pleasing the Lord and pleasing others in 1 Thess 2:4; 4:1).

Practical and pastoral implications

Dani counsels preachers and teachers to exercise self-awareness, humbly considering their biases and blindspots, as they prepare to teach on singleness and 1 Corinthians 7. She recommends talking with mature, trusted single and married Christians to learn what questions they have about the text and how certain applications might land on them to help inform one’s perspective and approach to teaching. First Corinthians 7 poses not just exegetical and theological concerns, but deeply pastoral ones as well.

Marriage and singleness function like a pair of portraits, each highlighting the beauty and dignity of the other. For instance, to understand the meaning of marriage, we have to understand something of the meaning of not being married. Thus, to diminish one doesn’t protect the other; to elevate one over the other in reality devalues both.

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

Does Paul prefer Christians remain single, despite the rest of the Bible’s positive portrayal of marriage? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Books by Danielle Treweek

• Treweek, Danielle. Single Ever After: A Biblical Vision for the Significance of Singleness. Good Book Company 2025.

Single Ever After: A Biblical Vision for the Significance of Singleness (Audio)

Regular price: $14.95

Add to cart

The Meaning of Singleness: Retrieving an Eschatological Vision for the Contemporary Church

Regular price: $27.99

Add to cart

Additional resources on 1 Corinthians 7 and singleness

Paul and Ancient Views of Sexual Desire: Paul’s Sexual Ethics in 1 Thessalonians 4, 1 Corinthians 7, and Romans 1

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

Body for the Lord: Sex and Identity in 1 Corinthians 5-7 (Library of New Testament Studies | LNTS/JSNTS)

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

Redeeming Singleness: How the Storyline of Scripture Affirms the Single Life

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

Singles at the Crossroads: A Fresh Perspective on Christian Singleness

Regular price: $14.99

Add to cart

Never Meant to Be Alone: How Singleness Points to Union with Jesus

Regular price: $9.10

Add to cart

Related content

1. Does Paul Allow Divorce & Remarriage? | Craig Keener on 1 Corinthians 7:15
2. Can You Value Marriage without Also Valuing Singleness?
3. What Does the Bible Say about Sexual Immorality? 3 Key Questions
4. Is the Song Allegorical? | Fellipe do Vale on Song of Solomon
5. Don’t Misread Proverbs 31. Discover Lady Wisdom.

Teaching the biblical languages can be a great joy and a great challenge. Watching new students learn how to read the Bible in its original languages and gain confidence in their new abilities is wonderful. But teaching the same grammatical concepts year after year can feel monotonous.

The challenge is worth rising to, because effective teaching is a skill that can be developed.

The tips that follow draw on years of teaching biblical Hebrew in an academic setting, but most of these suggestions could also apply to less formal contexts.¹⁴

Table of contents

1. Cultivate the right qualities as a teacher
2. Implement communicative learning methods
3. Identify and address reasons students struggle
4. Prepare students to retain the language long-term
Conclusion

1. Cultivate the right qualities as a teacher

Beyond the obvious requirement of knowing the language, effective teachers of the biblical languages also do the following:

Bring passion to the classroom

Students can tell when a teacher loves their topic. And having a teacher who loves biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek can go a long way toward encouraging students as they learn the language. Teachers who find joy in their topic can inspire joy in their students—even struggling students.

Live in the language

Teaching well is aided when teachers spend quality time in the language themselves, outside of class preparation.

This includes reading the language and keeping up with some of the research in the field, or possibly doing research yourself. Teachers who continue to deepen their understanding of the language have more to pull from when teaching others about the language.

And this helps draw us out of the monotony of teaching the same grammatical topics by giving us new ways to think about the topic or new examples to use. Sharing an interesting verse that you just encountered that has an example of the grammatical topic can often be more helpful than examples in the textbook—and it can draw in students to the importance of knowing the languages well.

Know and model your own limits

Let your students stump you with questions. It’s fine to not know an answer, or to delay an answer until after you check a source. Know what you know and what you don’t know. If your students ask a question about an area of study within the language that you are not familiar with, that’s okay.

It is especially important to teach students to know their own limits with the biblical languages. Witnessing their teachers acknowledge their own limits aids in that lesson.

2. Implement communicative learning methods

There are two primary camps within the field of biblical language pedagogy: the grammar–translation camp and the communicative camp. Grammar–translation is the traditional method used in nearly all Bible schools, universities, and seminaries. It’s the approach where students spend most of their time reading the grammar, listening to lectures, and completing workbook assignments.

The communicative approach eschews such methods (at least for initial language learning) and students are immersed in the language by a professor who only (or primarily) talks to them in the new language. This way, they learn how to speak in the language and hear the language before they learn to read and write it.

Research affirms that communicative methodologies provide better learning—and retention—of the language. But, realistically, there are numerous factors (often outside a teacher’s control) that limit the ability to change to a communicative approach. And since most of the conversations about biblical language pedagogy paint a picture of two extremes with no middle ground, usually nothing changes.

However, there are a variety of options between the two extremes. It is not all or nothing. Instead, I advocate for the small step approach.¹⁵ Each year, find one small change you can make to incorporate a communicative element into your class. I have been adding one small change each year for ten years. And now my classes, though still based on the grammar–translation methodology, include many communicative elements that have greatly benefited my students.

Below is a list of some of the changes I’ve made to my classes.

Require regular reading practice

Teach students to value spending time in the text by requiring them to practice reading a certain amount of time a week (preferably over multiple days). This is practice reading time, not translation or parsing time.

• Provide audio records (especially important in the first semester)
• If possible, have a TA that meets with them who can help them with pronunciation
• Give them texts that use vocabulary words and grammar that they are currently learning

This helps students to become more comfortable and proficient with the language.

Use back-translation exercises

Communicative approaches include students responding to questions by composing and replying in Hebrew. A middle-ground variation of this that can easily be worked into grammar–translation classrooms is to have students back-translate Bible verses from English into Hebrew.

My class textbook does not provide such elements, so I take some of the workbook verses and I provide the English (translated woodenly and with helpful clues about things like when to use the object marker) and have them compose the Hebrew. Then, they check their answers by looking in the workbook.

Incorporate non-biblical stories

Most students learning the biblical languages are largely familiar with the biblical text. This means that there will be times where their translation is more a remembering of what the passage says in English than an actual translation.

Using non-biblical stories is a great way to avoid this problem. Over several years, I composed vocabulary stories that corresponded to the textbook vocabulary lists and the grammar concepts. But easier options would be to integrate non-biblical stories from available resources, such as the stories found in The First Hebrew Primer (EKS, 1992) or Tall Tales Told in Biblical Hebrew (EKS, 1994).

Introduce basic comprehension questions

You do not need to jump fully into the communicative approach to use some Hebrew dialogue in your class. Set a goal to introduce just a few questions/responses into your class. Even simple questions such as: “What did he do?” with guidance on how to use words from the verses to answer the question can help students begin to internalize the language differently.

The book Millim: Words for Conversation in the Biblical Hebrew Classroom (GlossaHouse, 2019), by Paul Overland, is a great resource for finding questions to use.

Limit the use of English writing

My students are strictly forbidden from writing English glosses above the Hebrew words. When students do this, they are not translating but decoding.

Additionally, when we work on the workbook in groups during class, they are not allowed to write out the translation. Instead, they work it out together verbally, then after class they return to the assignment and write out the English translations. This gives them a chance to recall and reinforce what they already figured out about the text while re-reading the Hebrew.

3. Identify and address reasons students struggle

There are numerous reasons why students struggle with learning the biblical languages. In my experience, these are the primary reasons.

Recognize and dismantle mental block

Sometimes students struggle because they heard learning Hebrew or Aramaic or Greek would be difficult—and they believed it. And sometimes they struggle because they don’t believe they are capable. When they believe learning the languages is difficult (either because of the language or because of themselves), they put up a mental block that no amount of creative methodology can conquer.

In these situations, the best approach is to pull the student aside for a private conversation. Help them see the mental block and then directly speak encouragement into the student—and keep doing so. Teach them to celebrate every small win in learning the language instead of focusing on what they haven’t learned yet.

Help students recognize when they’ve taken on too much

Sometimes students struggle because they have too much on their plate—and everyone’s plate is a different size.

I have had numerous conversations with students in this situation. Some conversations include brainstorming ways the student can make adjustments to balance their responsibilities and suggesting different ways for them to study. And other conversations have ended with me teaching the student that sometimes the wisest thing to do is to drop a class and take it at a later point.

Know when to recommend alternatives to the traditional academic model

Teaching the biblical languages in a traditional academic model with school and accreditation requirements places requirements on how much the class must cover and the pace of the class. And some students simply need more time to process than the academic requirements allow. Sometimes these students, unfortunately, have to take the class a second time.

But in other situations, I have been able to recommend students take a class through a different school or venue that will provide the flexibility they need to process, and then transfer the credits in or test out. Just because the biblical languages are often taught within the constraints of the academic model does not mean that is the best way for everyone to learn the languages.

Logos equips students for a lifetime of study in the original languages. Explore solutions.

4. Prepare students to retain the language long-term

In all my training and preparations to teach the biblical languages, no one prepared me for the number of times I would hear impromptu confessionals. Numerous times, upon hearing what I teach, random people have confessed to me that they studied Hebrew years ago in seminary or college but they have now forgotten what they knew.

This story is far too common. This problem needs to be directly addressed with your students—and well before the last day of class.

• Share with your students ways in which you have struggled to make time for the language and the solutions that work for you.
• Share with them how you integrate the languages practically into your life, and share examples of other ways.
• Show them how you use your Bible programs. Show them what biblical texts you use and what resources you keep open. Encourage them to find a setup that works well for them.
• But also exhort students to set up their Bible software to aid retention—not hurt it. Parsing aids, glosses, and translations should be kept out of sight, since our eyes gravitate toward our native language more than we realize.

Finally equip them with a list of recommended resources that can aid them in retention. A few such recommendations are below:

• Glossa House Illustrated Biblical Texts (biblical texts presented in comic-book format)
• Kline, Jonathan. Keep Up Your Biblical Hebrew in Two Minutes a Day, vol 1: 365 Selections for Easy Review. Hendrickson, 2017. (Also available for Aramaic and Greek.)
• Howell, Adam, et al. Hebrew for Life: Strategies for Learning, Retaining, and Reviving Biblical Hebrew. Baker Academic, 2020. (Also available for Greek.)
• Merkle, Benjamin L., and H. H. Hardy II. Exegetical Gems from Biblical Hebrew and Greek. 2 vols. Baker Academic, 2019.

Share your thoughts

What strategies have you found helpful for teaching Greek or Hebrew? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Conclusion

Teaching the biblical languages well requires more than simply knowing the language. It requires methodology, attentiveness to struggling students, and a commitment to helping them build genuine confidence in their skills.

Keep your focus on the joy of helping your students read the Bible in its original languages, and the challenges will prove not just manageable but deeply rewarding.

Resources from the article

• Noonan, Jennifer. A Handbook of Second Language Acquisition for Biblical Studies: Insights of Modern Language Instruction for Teaching Biblical Languages. GlossaHouse, 2022.
• Overland, Paul. Millim: Words for Conversation in the Biblical Hebrew Classroom. GlossaHouse, 2019.
• GlossaHouse Illustrated Biblical Texts

The First Hebrew Primer

Regular price: $27.99

Add to cart

Keep up Your Biblical Hebrew in Two Minutes a Day, Vol. 1: 365 Selections for Easy Review

Regular price: $32.99

Add to cart

Keep up Your Biblical Aramaic in Two Minutes a Day: 365 Selections for Easy Review

Regular price: $32.99

Add to cart

Keep up Your Biblical Greek in Two Minutes a Day, Volume 1: 365 Selections for Easy Review

Regular price: $32.99

Add to cart

Hebrew for Life: Strategies for Learning, Retaining, and Reviving Biblical Hebrew

Regular price: $22.99

Add to cart

Greek for Life: Strategies for Learning, Retaining, and Reviving New Testament Greek

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

Exegetical Gems from Biblical Greek and Hebrew (2 vols.)

Regular price: $37.99

Add to cart

Related content

• So You Want to Learn Greek? 7 Questions to Consider
• What Are the Best Hebrew & Aramaic Lexicons? Your Ultimate Guide
• Developing a Teaching Philosophy: A Guide for Theological Educators
• How to Write a Syllabus: 10 Commandments for a Better Semester
• Our Unspoken Curriculums: How Pedagogical Choices Communicate

More than any other national observance in America, Juneteenth challenges the connection between historical liberation and modern Christian identity.

While some worry the holiday is a vehicle for secular “woke” philosophy, a closer look reveals a movement saturated in Christian legacy. The road to June 19, 1865, was paved by the prayerful vigils of the enslaved and the convictions of Christian abolitionists like the AME Zion’s Frederick Douglass and his Quaker counterpart, William Lloyd Garrison. Juneteenth emerged from spiritual devotion and civic struggle.

Historically speaking, Christians are uniquely situated, then, to celebrate the holiday as a theological necessity that reconciles the Bible’s mandate for liberation with the contradictions of the American narrative of exceptionalism.

In this article, I examine the historical reception of two types of Christian response to the Bible’s teaching on slavery (John Calvin’s and Frederick Douglass/William Lloyd Garrison’s) and put them in conversation with the more modern history and concerns that Juneteenth recalls.

Dismantling the idols of a selective memory

Juneteenth mirrors the African American Christian “Watch Night” tradition, where Black enslaved Christians ushered in the new year awaiting Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation through a “freedom vigil” of prayer, song, and testimony in church. Just as those believers “waited on the Lord” and the law declared slaves free in 1863, Juneteenth emerged from that same blend of spiritual and civic devotion. The holiday has been “canonized” by everything from spirituals to communal meals; parades to BBQs; citizenship training and voter’s rights seminars to prayer meetings. This trajectory, collectively, stands as proof that the civic struggle for freedom and the Christian ethos are inextricably linked.

It is ironic, then, that there is a growing animus against Juneteenth from some Christians. Purportedly, the celebration of Juneteenth is divisive, only focusing on the liberation of Blacks rather than the whole country. These critics opt to reserve celebrations of “freedom” only to the 4th of July.

Never mind the irony that, on July 4, 1776, our country was celebrating its liberation from the “tyranny” of the Crown while enslaving a portion of its own population. Neither should we forget that, at the time of the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 1776, there were approximately 450,000 enslaved persons across the thirteen colonies.¹⁶ Yet, by the time news of liberation had reached Galveston in 1865, the number had grown to approximately four million. This means that we didn’t get better in our fight for freedom. We became worse.

The blind spots and the contradictions that Juneteenth evokes, then, make it a prime candidate for serving as a “mirror” for the American Christian conscience. Celebration, particularly the Christian celebration of Juneteenth, has the potential to dismantle the idols of a selective memory, replacing a distorted liberation with a transformative, biblically-grounded vision of what it actually means to be “free indeed,” because Juneteenth operates on the core logic of collective liberation: that we are not truly free until we are all free.

2 readings, 2 legacies: Deuteronomy 23

By tracing the divergent ways Christian tradition has wrestled with the Bible’s teachings on human slavery—moving from the systematic caution of John Calvin to the prophetic demands of Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison—we see the specific historical anxieties that Juneteenth eventually answered.

Perhaps there is no better line of inquiry that demonstrates this than Calvin’s interpretation vs. the aforementioned abolitionists’ interpretation of Deuteronomy 23:15–16: “If a slave has taken refuge with you, do not hand them over to their master. Let them live among you wherever they like and in whatever town they choose. Do not oppress them” (Deut 23:15–16 NIV).

Social stability: John Calvin

Despite a reputedly “progressive” stance that frames slavery as a corruption of the imago dei,¹⁷ Calvin’s exegesis of Deuteronomy 23 and Philemon betrays a deep-seated commitment to institutional stability over social transformation.

Some have queried whether or not this can be attributed to the lack of exposure to the type of slavery that occurred in the Americas,¹⁸ essentially arguing that had Calvin witnessed the egregious summation of the status quo of chattel slavery, he might have responded differently. In my estimation, however, Calvin’s ambivalence can be better ascertained by identifying a profound hermeneutical blind spot where his social ethics and his exegesis collide.

Of Deuteronomy, he observes,

Besides, since runaway slaves are generally wicked and criminal, whatever place may be their asylum, it will be filled with many sources of infection. … For, suppose a thief, or an adulterer, or a murderer, should leave his master, and seek for an asylum in the Holy Land, what else would it have been to receive and protect such guests, but to overthrow law and justice, and to set up a state of foul barbarism? I think, therefore, that more is to be understood than the words express, viz., that, if it should be found that the slaves had not fled in consequence of their own evil doings, but on account of the excessive cruelty of their masters, the people should not drive them away, which would have been tantamount to giving them up to butchery.¹⁹

While Calvin elsewhere acknowledges the slave as a bearer of the imago dei, here his hermeneutic is compromised by a distinct prejudice against the fugitive—one that dismisses the runaway as “inherently wicked or criminal.” Assuming that most runaway slaves were criminals, he suggested that the text should be understood as encapsulating an implicit condition: People should only shelter those escaping excessive cruelty of their masters, thereby protecting the fugitive-slave from death or unjustified injury, but not necessarily overturning the institution of slavery itself.

Similarly, in Philemon, he observes,

Paul therefore reminds Philemon that he ought not to be so greatly offended at the flight of his slave, for it was the cause of a benefit not to be regretted. So long as Onesimus was at heart a runaway, Philemon, though he had him in his house, did not actually enjoy him as his property; for he was wicked and unfaithful, and could not be of real advantage. He says, therefore, that he was a wanderer for a little time, that, by changing his place, he might be converted and become a new man.²⁰

Calvin’s remarks on Onesimus’s flight highlight his presumption that the fugitive had “defrauded” his master, emphasizing the restoration of the master’s legal rights over the slave’s desire for autonomy. He often presumes that slaves run away due to a “vicious nature” and projects upon Paul an offense concerning Onesimus’s status as a “runaway.”

To be sure, Calvin is not alone in his treatment of Onesimus. Most in church history have interpreted Onesimus as a rebel rather than a refugee in need of liberty.²¹ The hermeneutic paradox demonstrated by Calvin and his predecessors is rooted not just in an attempt to read the text faithfully, but in whose lived experience the interpreter prioritized. Calvin, insulated by his sociological privilege and his role as a reformer working within a relatively narrow context of homogeneity, could afford an interpretive “goal” of using Scripture to maintain social order.²²

Ironically, this concern for “order” caused Calvin to look past the plain meaning of the text, particularly in the case of Deuteronomy 23:15–16.

Prophetic disruption: Frederick Douglass and William Lloyd Garrison

In stark contrast, Frederick Douglass and his Quaker counterpart, William Lloyd Garrison, pointed to this same verse to declare the 1850 Fugitive Slave Act both sinful and unconstitutional. Where Calvin’s bias serves as a buffer to his logical conclusions of his theology, essentially reinforcing the status quo, the abolitionists saw a mandate from God, eventually using Deuteronomy 23 to provide the moral and legal framework for the Underground Railroad—the very movement that birthed the liberation Juneteenth eventually fulfilled.

This has tremendous resonances with current debates of whether Christians should celebrate Juneteenth or not. This “resonance” is the tension between “Preservation of Order” and “Prophetic Liberation.” It wasn’t just the Texas enslavers who willfully held back information about slave liberation that were agents of preservation of a sinful order. Calvin’s Christian interpretation accomplished the same goal, even if it was unintentional.

Just as Calvin looked at a runaway slave and saw a potential “source of infection” or a “thief” who threatened the stability of the state, many modern Christian critics of Juneteenth view the holiday through a lens of social anxiety. The current animus often stems from a fear that acknowledging Juneteenth validates a disruption of the American narrative and a loss of the status quo. To be sure, it does do that, but that is what the prophetic aspect of the Christian witness is supposed to do. It is supposed to disrupt our gaze. This prophetic mirror should not bring consternation within the Christian community. It should bring consolation.

Juneteenth is a part of America’s identity. More importantly, it is a part of the Christian American identity. If this is the case, then Juneteenth should motivate us to a commitment of theological inquiry into the ongoing Christian witness of the movement.

A hermeneutic of solidarity

While Christian inquiry has already begun, I would like to posit one further line of inquiry by considering the larger literary context of Deuteronomy 23 and asking the question: What would motivate Moses to instruct the Israelites, “You shall not hand over to his master a slave who has escaped from his master to you” (Deut 23:15)? I suggest that the answer is partially found in a hermeneutical vantage point of Israel’s status as second generation of refugees from Egypt.

This hermeneutic is partially seen in a brief comparison of the Sabbath law in Exodus 20:9–11 and Deuteronomy 5:12–15. In the former passage, the logic of the Sabbath is grounded in the creation: because God rested, Israel should rest. Interestingly, in Deuteronomy 5:12–15, the logic of the Sabbath is no longer grounded in the creational rest of Yahweh, but the redemptive acts of Yahweh and Israel’s embodied experience as slaves. Moses says they should not work nor force “your son or your daughter or your male servant or your female servant or your ox or your donkey or any of your cattle or your sojourner who stays with you,” to work—they are to rest as well as you (Deut 5:14). Why? Moses states, “And you shall remember that you were a slave in the land of Egypt” (Deut 5:15).

By grounding the law in the visceral memory of their own bondage, Moses transforms Israel’s history into a mandatory ethic of solidarity. This shared identity as former captives creates a moral imperative where the protection of the fugitive in Deuteronomy 23:15–16 is not merely a social courtesy, but a safeguard against the re-emergence of the Egyptian tyranny within their own borders, refusing Israel the opportunity to become little Pharaohs.

Because contemporary critiques of Juneteenth often prioritize hegemonic patriotism over shared identity with African American Christians, the holiday remains a prophetic mirror. Yet it offers the Christian critics the same opportunity Moses gave Israel: to confront its proclivity for tyranny while having the testimony of the redeemed. To ignore this dual reality is to behold one’s image in a mirror, walk away, and immediately forget what kind of person one was (Jas 1:22–25).

Share your thoughts

How does Scripture position us to celebrate Juneteeth? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Tyran Laws recommended resources for further reflection

Deuteronomy (The New American Commentary | NAC)

Regular price: $25.99

Add to cart

Pillars of Cloud and Fire: The Politics of Exodus in African American Biblical Interpretation

Regular price: $13.19

Add to cart

Texas Stories I Like to Tell My Friends: Real-life Tales of Love, Betrayal, and Dreams from the History of the Lone Star State

Regular price: $7.49

Add to cart

Related content

• Endurance Produced by Suffering: The Black Church in America
• Black Political Theology: An Anti-oppression Faith
• 10 Notable Books by Black Theologians to Add to Your Library
• 6 Black Theologians from Church History You Should Know
• Does the Bible Condone Slavery? | Rebecca McLaughlin

Psalm 137 ends with one of the Bible’s most scandalizing lines: a prayer that an enemy’s infants would be dashed against rocks. It understandably troubles believers, and for skeptics, it’s a classic case against the Bible’s goodness. Does this cry for violence—especially against innocent babies—belong in what is supposed to be a sacred hymn book? On this episode of What in the Word?, Kirk E. Miller brings in Dr. Bruce Waltke to reckon with this troubling passage.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Bruce Waltke

Bruce Waltke is Professor Emeritus of Old Testament at Regent College and Knox Theological Seminary. He holds a ThD in Greek and New Testament (Dallas Theological Seminary) and a PhD in ancient Near Eastern languages (Harvard). His career also included teaching positions at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, Dallas Theological Seminary, and Reformed Theological Seminary. Dr. Waltke has written numerous scholarly books and articles and edited or contributed to various editions of the Bible, including the New American Standard Version and the New International Version. He was also president of the Evangelical Theological Society (1975). He and his late wife, Elaine, have three children and three grandchildren.

Episode synopsis

The context of the cry

Psalm 137 speaks to the experience of the Babylonian exile. The Southern Kingdom of Judah has been conquered, Jerusalem has been destroyed, and the people have been carried off. Their captors gloat, demanding they perform a joyous song of Zion while Zion lies in ruin and the people lack all joy (Ps 137:1–6).

Psalm 137:7 turns to address God, calling on him to remember how the Edomites cheered on Jerusalem’s destruction when it fell. Then Psalm 137:8–9 turns attention to Babylon itself, calling for her own devastation and declaring “blessed” whoever repays her with what she has done.

Many of us come to a passage like this from places of comfort and security, with little frame of reference for the kind of deep suffering the exiles experienced. However, a sympathetic engagement of Psalm 137 will reckon with the utter brutality to which it responds.

Delineating the difficulty

Christian readers often see this prayer for violent retribution as contradicted by the Bible’s—especially the New Testament’s—ethic of non-retaliation (e.g., Luke 6:27–36; Rom 12:17–21; 1 Pet 3:9; 1 Thess 5:15; cf. Lev 19:18; Prov 20:22; 24:29). Jesus tells his followers to love their enemies and turn the other cheek (Matt 5:38–48). From the cross, Jesus prays for the forgiveness of those wrongfully executing him (Luke 23:34). Stephen follows suit as he’s stoned to death (Acts 7:60). In fact, we are told to bless, not curse (Luke 6:28; 1 Cor 4:12). So how can the same Bible that holds up these models also contain a prayer for vengeance?

Furthermore, Psalm 137:9’s difficulty is not merely its call for violent retribution, but its call for the destruction of infants who have done no wrong. Are they to bear the sins of their parents (cf. Deut 24:16; Ezek 18:20)?

Finally, the psalm describes the person who would perform this act as “blessed.” This is the same word used elsewhere in the Psalter to describe the righteous person who walks in the ways of God (e.g., Ps 1:1–6; see also Ps 2:12). How can someone who commits infanticide be so regarded?

Different interpretations

Several attempts to make sense of Psalm 137:9, and the imprecatory psalms in general, have been proposed over the centuries.

1. Predictive. Some take the Hebrew form of this verb as simply describing what will happen (a statement of fact), not a desire or prayer for this to happen. Dr. Bruce Waltke finds this reading implausible.

2. Immoral. Others deem the psalm to be wrong and immoral at this point. The psalm contains the raw, albeit sinful response of the psalmist to injustice.

However, the Psalter provides no indication that such cries for judgment were inappropriate. Moreover, the Psalms were intended for public worship (e.g., “to the choirmaster”). Additionally, Waltke points to 2 Timothy 3:16, which states that all Scripture—including the imprecatory psalms—are divinely inspired and profitable for training in righteousness.

3. Discontinuity. Still others suggest the Psalter’s imprecations, like Psalm 137:7–9, are un-Christian (or maybe sub-Christian). Whereas the Old Testament regularly models violence and desire for vengeance, the New Testament provides a superior ethic of forgiveness, non-retaliation, and non-violence.

However, conflicting with this suggestion, the New Testament quotes imprecatory psalms approvingly (e.g., Acts 1:20; Rom 11:9–10) and even pronounces curses of its own at times (e.g., Acts 8:20–23; 13:9–11; 1 Cor 16:22; Gal 1:8–9; 2 Tim 4:14). The New Testament speakers see themselves as heirs of the Old Testament’s ethics (e.g., Matt 22:34–40). The imprecatory psalms cannot be dismissed as a relic of an ethically inferior dispensation, as they are being prayed even today by morally perfected saints in heaven: Revelation depicts the martyrs crying out for God to take vengeance on their persecutors (Rev 6:9–10).

4. Allegory. Some early Christian interpretations allegorized the text. For example, Augustine took the “rock” as Christ (per 1 Cor 10:4) and the “infants” as “evil desires newly come to birth” which we are to destroy via Christ.²³ However, this approach severs the psalm from its historical and literary context and is disconnected from the actual concerns of the text.

5. Justice. A final view, advocated by Bruce Waltke and others, is that the psalm expresses a righteous call for proper divine justice in response to evil.

Babylon’s guilt and lex talionis

Waltke seeks to make sense of this passage by situating it within the Old Testament’s broader theological framework of justice.

Although God used Babylon to discipline Israel, Babylon was not thereby innocent. God can use an unjust agent for a just purpose without approving the agent’s methods or motives (e.g., Isa 10:5). Israel had not wronged Babylon. Babylon’s conquest was brutal and included atrocities against the civilian population. As a result, Babylon itself deserves—and will face—God’s judgment.

With regards to the specific language of dashing infants, the psalm seems to suggest that Babylon had done this very thing to Israel (“see according to what you have done to us”; Ps 137:8). This prayer for the same fate to fall on Babylon is direct application of lex talionis (eye for eye, tooth for tooth, etc.; see Exod 21:24). Lex talionis was not a call for savage revenge. Quite to the contrary, it required proportional justice, a safeguard against disproportionate revenge like that of Lamech in Genesis 4:23–24. In its original context, lex talionis insists that punishment must match the crime (i.e., “eye for eye”—and no more).

The imprecatory psalms are prayers for God’s kingdom to come on earth as it is in heaven (Matt 6:10). This, among other things, includes the executing of God’s just judgment on evil.

Vengeance is God’s, not ours

In the Old Testament, the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Israel were co-extensive. Israel was to be a theocratic state in which the nation embodied the covenant community. Thus, it at times wielded divinely authorized violence, such as in the Canaanite conquest. By contrast, today the church is not a geopolitical state but transcends such boundaries.

Thus, we must recognize all the more the distinction between the ethics of the state and the ethics of the church. Vengeance is the responsibility of the state who bears the sword (Rom 13:4). It is not the prerogative of the private Christian (Rom 12:19). Vengeance is God’s (Rom 12:17–21), mediated provisionally during this time through his minister, the state (Rom 13:1–4).

Within Israel’s legal structure, personal revenge was also prohibited. Vengeance had to be carried out by the community through due process, or through the cities of refuge in cases of manslaughter (Num 35:6–34). Where no human court could reach a verdict, the appeal went to the highest court: God himself.

This is precisely what Psalm 137 is doing. The exiles in Babylon cannot bring charges before any tribunal. Babylon is beyond their reach. So they do the only thing available: They take the case to God, asking him to act as judge and to render a just verdict. Rather than encouraging and giving license to revenge, the imprecatory psalms restrain it. Instead of taking matters into their own hands, the psalmist places vengeance in God’s.

Is the language hyperbolic?

Kirk E. Miller asks whether the language of dashing infants is meant to be taken literally or if we are meant to understand it as hyperbolic ancient Near Eastern (ANE) war rhetoric. Should we read this as a literal desire for violence or is it a conventional poetic expression of total destruction of an oppressor?

Waltke acknowledges the legitimacy of this question. At the same time, as he explains, historical records show that ancient cultures, such as Sparta, did practice infanticide of this sort. Thus, the prayer in Psalm 137 may well be literal, understood within this framework as proportional justice for the exact things Babylon had done (“as they have done to us”; Ps 137:8).

As Waltke explains, the world of the Old Testament operated with a sense of community solidarity, rather than individualism (e.g., Josh 7). Children would have been seen as the continuation of their parents’ trajectory. Babylon was not merely a political enemy but a tyrannical kingdom whose next generation was assumed to perpetuate its evil. Thus, destroying the next generation was a way of ending Babylon’s capacity for harm.

“Blessed” is the one who does this?

As noted above, the Hebrew אַשְׁרֵי (often translated “happy” or “blessed”) is used elsewhere to refer to the righteous. But can someone be “blessed” for violently killing infants?

Waltke clarifies that אַשְׁרֵי functions not as an emotional state (“happy”) but as a declaration of divine reward: how rewarded is the one who … Compare this usage with the Beatitudes of Jesus: “Blessed are the poor in spirit” does not describe a positive feeling but God’s favor and vindication of a certain kind of person and way of life.

With this in mind, the “blessing” of Psalm 137 is not celebrating bloodlust as a virtue. It is declaring that whoever executes this righteous judgment on this tyrannical empire is rewarded by God for upholding his justice.

The eschatological horizon

Kirk introduces the potential eschatological implications of this psalm, particularly as it connects to the judgment of “Babylon” in the book of Revelation. The arc of redemptive history shows that the full realization of justice that Psalm 137 looks for awaits the return of Christ. The imprecatory psalms, thus, are an expression of this hope.

Jim Hamilton’s commentary on the Psalms makes this observation on Psalm 137 specifically:

In Ps 137 the psalmist longs for the vindication of God’s people promised in Deut 32:36, recalled in Ps 135:14, guaranteed in Ps 136. This vindication will be realized by the Ps 1 blessed man (137:8, 9), who arises to do what was promised in Ps 2:9, rule the nations with a rod of iron, shattering them like a potter’s vessel. The word “shatter” (נפץ) occurs only twice in the Psalter, at 2:9 and 137:9. The 137:8–9 twofold use of “blessed” (אשרי), the first word of Ps 1 that opens the concluding statement of Ps 2, and the use of this verb “shatter” join together to assert that the blessed king from David’s line, spoken of in Pss 1 and 2, is the seed of the woman who will crush the head of the seed of the serpent in Ps 137:9. This interpretation receives confirmation from the fact that Ps 137 precedes the final set of Davidic psalms in the Psalter, Pss 138–145. The conqueror blessed in Ps 137:8–9 will be the future king from David’s line, David’s own Lord (110:1, 6).²⁴

Preaching and applying the psalm

Resist the temptation to skip or sanitize this passage. The imprecatory psalms, including Psalm 137, give language to genuine suffering. They refuse to pretend that evil is not evil. At their core, they are acts of extraordinary trust in God, who alone is qualified to render final judgment. They call us, like Christ, to entrust ourselves to God (1 Pet 2:23) rather than perpetuate cycles of retaliation.

When we find ourselves suffering unjustly—when there is no earthly court to appeal to, no mechanism for redress—we must not despair. Neither should we retaliate. Rather, the imprecatory psalms, like Psalm 137, teach us to bring our case to God. We are to live by faith that God sees, that he judges rightly, and that he will act—even if that means waiting for Christ’s return for this judgment.

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

What do you make of Psalm 137? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further study

How to Read and Understand the Psalms

Regular price: $27.99

Add to cart

The Psalms as Christian Lament: A Historical Commentary

Regular price: $33.99

Add to cart

War Psalms of the Prince of Peace: Lessons from the Imprecatory Psalms, 2nd ed.

Regular price: $7.99

Add to cart

Imprecations in the Psalms: Love for Enemies in Hard Places

Regular price: $39.99

Add to cart

Psalms: Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary (2 vols.) (EBTC)

Regular price: $74.99

Add to cart

The Psalms: A Christ-Centered Commentary (4 vols.)

Regular price: $118.99

Add to cart

Psalms (The Expositor’s Bible Commentary, Revised Edition, Volume 5 | REBC)

Regular price: $66.99

Add to cart

A Commentary on the Psalms, 3 vols. (Kregel Exegetical Library)

Regular price: $120.99

Add to cart

Related content

• Don’t Avoid Imprecatory Psalms: How to Preach the Cursing Prayers
• Love Your Enemies: The Most Challenging Command Jesus Gave
• How Should You Read the Psalms? By Singing Them
• Did God Command Genocide? | Tremper Longman on the Canaanite Conquest
• Must Christians Submit to Government? | Kaitlyn Schiess on Romans 13:1–7

Theological method, sometimes called theological prolegomenon, is a formal account of how to do theology that pays attention to the objectives, categories of evidence, subdisciplines, and techniques of theology.

While this definition may sound dry, its importance becomes clear when we recognize that theological method develops tools to support evangelizing, teaching, exploring new questions, and resolving disputes. Without a clear method, theology can collapse into arbitrary assertions or illogical claims.

This article will explore fundamental dimensions of theological method.

The theologian and theological method

Before we begin to do theology, we must consider who we are as theologians. John Calvin famously explains, “Our wisdom … consists almost entirely of two parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves.”²⁵ Our self-reflection considers whether we have the character necessary to do theology while considering the questions that drive us to the task.

When the Lord calls Isaiah to proclaim the will of God, Isaiah responds: “Woe is me for I am ruined because I am a man of unclean lips” (Isa 6:5). The Lord provides atonement for Isaiah, cleanses him, and sends him to fulfill his prophetic vocation. Similarly, we who would speak of the infinitely holy God should recognize our own unworthiness and rely on God’s cleansing work in our lives to enable us to speak truthfully.

Teachers are held to a higher standard (Jas 3:1), so theology does well to proceed in prayer by asking God to give virtues like wisdom to discern the truth, or temperance to restrain ourselves from speaking about what we do not understand.

Theological method is especially guided by faith, hope, and love (1 Cor 13:13). Theology proceeds from a position of faith, pursuing what Anselm of Canterbury called “faith seeking understanding,” beginning with a commitment to the Bible, the gospel, and, above all, the triune God and his work for us, seeking to understand what we already believe. Theology ought to encourage our hopeful perseverance as we await the coming of the kingdom. Love enables us to read a breadth of theology charitably; but in love for our neighbor who might be misled, to also firmly stand for truth.

Self-reflection also leads us to consider what Mary Veeneman calls the orienting question, “the questions that drive a particular thinker’s theological approach.”²⁶ Our cultural background, personal faith journeys, denominational commitments, or family of origin may drive us to make certain questions central to our theological pursuits. While God can speak through Scripture into these contexts, we can also distort our theology by centering issues important to us that may not be central to the biblical witness.

Sources in theological method

While secular societies increasingly view religion as mere opinion, it is a fundamental conviction of theologians that our claims rely on evidence which can be evaluated. Theological method requires presenting and synthesizing evidence to establish claims which lead to our understanding of God, often under the direction of an orienting question.

Sources for theology

Traditionally, Christians drew evidence from four sources of what has been called the Wesleyan Quadrilateral: Scripture, tradition, reason, and experience.

1. Scripture: Because God reveals himself through inspired Scripture, the Bible is crucial theological evidence, though we must be careful to properly interpret it.
2. Tradition: The Holy Spirit has directed the church across history (John 16:13–15), so we can expect tradition (councils, creeds, historical figures, etc.) to help guide us in the interpretation of Scripture and in the use of reason and experience.
3. Reason: Something of God is known in creation (Rom 1:19–20) through general revelation, and God is clear that the renewed mind can discern God’s will (Rom 12:2) while “hollow and deceptive philosophy” (Col 2:8) can mislead us. Therefore, theology must attend to reason as used in such disciplines as history, the social and natural sciences, and especially philosophy.
4. Experience: Experience plays an important role by connecting theology to real life. Considering the diverse experiences of others can also help us check for biases in our own thinking.

Synthesizing sources

Though theologians affirm the same categories of evidence, theological methods can be distinguished based on how they synthesize, emphasize, and prioritize these categories.

First, different emphases distinguish theological disciplines. Broadly, the discipline of theology can be divided into other subdisciplines, such as:

• Biblical theology focuses on Scripture, attending to theological themes and issues within specific texts, genres, or historical periods.
• Historical theology focuses on tradition, considering the context, meaning, and development of ideas and disputes across history.
• Philosophical theology relies especially on reason, using philosophy to understand concepts, relationships between concepts, and the truth or falsity of theological claims.
• Systematic theology proper tends to synthesize the work of these other disciplines for use in a particular context.

Second, Christians have prioritized different categories of evidence, leading to different denominational emphases. Historically, Protestants (including evangelicals) have affirmed sola scriptura. This method treats the Scriptures as the only infallible source of theology, so when another category of evidence appears to contradict the Bible, this method accepts the Bible and rejects or reinterprets other evidence. Protestant theology inescapably draws on the other categories of evidence, since all readings of the Bible are influenced by tradition and experience, making hermeneutics, a discipline shaped by reason, quite important.

Christians have understood tradition through both single-source and dual-source theories.²⁷ Single-source theories often treat tradition as a fixed way of interpreting the Bible or as its continual unfolding. Dual-source theories, on the other hand, understand tradition to be a source that can provide additional truths beyond those disclosed in Scripture. The Roman Catholic Church relied on this method at the Council of Trent when it rejected many Protestant teachings. This reminds us of how important theological method can be, since it can lie beneath some of the sharpest divisions within Christianity.

While most Christians prioritize either Scripture or a combination of Scripture and tradition, rationalists prioritize reason as the top authority, sometimes even rejecting those principles from Scripture that cannot be demonstrated rationally. Experience can be the most important source for spiritualists, who value direct encounter with God, or for some forms of contextual theology, a topic discussed below.

Goal(s) of theological method

Theological methods can differ based on the way theologians prioritize evidence. But theologians may also pursue different goals:

1. Some methods emphasize orthodoxy, centering the importance of right knowledge about God.
2. Others emphasize orthopraxis, or right action in light of who God is.
3. Finally, some emphasize proper spiritual experience of God, or orthopathy.²⁸

Given the importance of faith, hope, and love (1 Cor 13:13), as noted above, there is reason to balance pursuit of all three goals.

Use lenses in Logos’s Factbook to study topics from a theological angle. Start a free trial!

Hermeneutical disputes in theological method

Even if two theologians share the same orienting question, agree about the relative weight of categories of evidence, and prioritize the same goals, further methodological disagreements on hermeneutics can result in important theological differences.

Broadly speaking, theological methods rely on three methods of interpreting the Bible:

1. Historical criticism explores the sources behind the Bible and the influence of surrounding cultures, treating Scripture as a historical text like any other. Extensive use of this approach can lead to substantial revisions in traditional theology. For this reason, many conservative theologians are suspicious of this method, particularly if used in isolation.
2. Historical–grammatical interpretation relies on the literal sense of Scripture, considering what the human author meant to say to the original audience in its original context.²⁹
3. Theological interpretation of Scripture explores how divine authorship of Scripture may allow for multiple layers of meaning that may exceed what was understood or known by the original human author and/or audience.³⁰

Diverging hermeneutical methods have played an important role in debates on Christian doctrines like the Trinity, where eternal generation of the Son often includes a theological interpretation of Proverbs 8, and Christ’s work, such as whether he descended to the dead.

Contextualization in theological method

All theology is contextual in the sense that all theologians write from a specific cultural and historical context and are influenced in their thinking by their personal background and identity. We cannot think that these factors are so strong that they prevent us from knowing God truly, because he is revealing himself to all nations (Ezek 38:23; Mal 1:11; Rev 15:4). Nevertheless, it is also true that context matters for theology, as we shall see.

The need for contextualization arises from the text of Scripture itself. The Great Commission clearly calls us to make disciples of all nations (Matt 28:18–20). We could fulfill this mandate by first making potential converts learn Greek and follow Mediterranean culture from the time of Christ. However, the Bible gives two reasons to instead present the gospel so that it fits new cultural contexts.

First, the New Testament uses the Hebrew Old Testament in a form translated into Greek, a canonical endorsement of continued translation work. This separates Christianity from a religion like Islam, where the Quran is to be kept in Arabic.

Second, particularly Paul’s letters but also the Jerusalem Council emphasize that Christian converts were not required to adopt the entirety of Jewish custom and practice to become Christians (Acts 15:23–29). Combined, these principles shape what Lamin Sanneh calls the “translation principle,” where gospel presentation allows us to present Christian faith in a new cultural idiom.³¹

Once the gospel is received in a new culture, it will require theology to explain, defend, and teach it. Contextualization involves decisions about which vocabulary in a new language appropriately reflects theological truth. Careful discernment may also identify philosophical frameworks within the recipient culture that could be fruitful for use in theology. New orienting questions may arise as theologians grapple with challenges from culture, other religions, or the moral context in which theology is done. For example, if theological method did not attend to difference in Chinese Christianity from other contexts, it would not address key disputes about the veneration of ancestors,³² the relevance of Confucianism to philosophical theology, or the appropriate theological response to Communist restrictions on freedom of worship, to name only three examples.

Sound theological method would therefore do well to always pay attention to contextualization.

Major theological methods today

Now that we have explored the foundations of theological method, I can briefly introduce some of the most influential theological methods today:

• Analytic theology: This method draws on analytic philosophy and emphasizes clear thinking, precise terminology, and logically coherent accounts of Christian doctrine. Analytic theology can be philosophical theology or a more integrated systematic theology.³³
• Classical–evangelical: A classical–evangelical method often attends to “systematizing and codifying” the Bible’s teaching into distinct doctrines.³⁴
• Contextual theology: Contextual theologies consciously attend to the issues of contextualization addressed above. This approach can emphasize specific categories such as race, ethnicity, nationality, or gender, among many others.³⁵
• Liberation theology: This method focuses on the context of the poor, developing a theology with a specific focus on orthopraxis, understood as standing in solidarity with and learning from the poor.³⁶
• Natural theology: Natural theology emphasizes general revelation, such as philosophy, psychology, or science, in order to deduce information about our Creator and his intentions for creation.³⁷
• Retrieval theology: This is a term for methods focusing on recovering classical Reformation, medieval, or early Christian tradition as a source for theological truth (or as a guide for reading Scripture), sometimes called theologies of retrieval.³⁸

Theological method and preaching

While some might think that theological method is best suited for the academy, it also matters for the pulpit. Preaching is, after all, both shaped by theology and a form of (pastoral) theology in its own right.

• Theological method is important for crafting a sermon. Though rooted in biblical exegesis, the sermon also addresses a congregation in a particular context, a fact that requires attending to contextualization or using reason to explain or defend the Bible’s claims.
• Preaching can take many forms, but those sermons that focus on teaching may center certain doctrines like the resurrection, the Trinity, or the virginal conception on Easter, Trinity Sunday, or Christmas. Here, theological method shapes how the pastor teaches sound doctrine.
• Similarly, when developing a sermon, the preacher would do well to consider whether theological evidence supports whatever claims that the sermon makes.
• Finally, though advanced methods like analytic theology or liberation theology may not enter the content of the sermon, the pastor who has attended to a wide range of theological methods can discern which commentaries align with the convictions of the denomination or church in which the sermon is delivered.

Theological method is therefore essential for the development and delivery of the sermon and the practical life of local congregations.

Share your thoughts

How should we do theology? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Glenn Butner’s suggested resources

How to Read Theology: Engaging Doctrine Critically and Charitably

Regular price: $23.99

Add to cart

Reformed Catholicity: The Promise of Retrieval for Theology and Biblical Interpretation

Regular price: $21.99

Add to cart

Evangelical Theological Method: Five Views (Spectrum Multiview Books)

Regular price: $15.99

Add to cart

Introducing Theological Method

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

Related content

1. Theology: The Definitive Guide to Getting Started
2. What Is Systematic Theology and Why Does It Matter?
3. Is There Such a Thing as an Evangelical Approach to Theology?
4. Will Evangelicals Lead a Revival in Dogmatic Theology?
5. What Does It Mean to “Apply” the Bible?

Have you ever tried to explain the Trinity and accidentally committed a heresy? You are not alone. The usual suspect, perhaps, is Modalism.

Modalism may sound right to many believers. However, it critically misunderstands the nature of God as presented in Scripture.

Let us explore what this heresy is, why it matters, and how we can avoid it.

What is Modalism?

Modalism (also called Sabellianism or Modalistic Monarchianism) teaches that God is one Person who reveals himself in different modes or roles. It strictly affirms one God but completely denies three distinct Persons. A Modalist believes the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are the exact same Person, only wearing different masks. According to this ancient heresy, the Father, Son, and Spirit are not three co-existing divine Persons, but a single God with no threeness, only oneness.

In contrast, Trinitarianism says God eternally co-exists as three Persons of one nature. Modalism holds that God is a single being who sometimes appears as the Father, the Son, or the Spirit. The big distinction here is that Modalism rejects three Persons. In Modalism, there’s one God, one essence, one Person. These three manifestations of God are not co-eternal or co-existing.

According to Modalism, God reveals himself in the Old Testament as the Father. God in the Old Testament is not revealing himself as the Son or Spirit. It’s not that the Son does not exist at this point, because, according to Modalism, the Son is simply one way God shows up. He is not a distinct Person or entity. But then, when the incarnation occurs, God reveals himself as the Son, not as the Father (or the Spirit).

When did Modalism begin, and who was Sabellius?

Modalism emerged in the late second and early third centuries.

Sabellius was a teacher active in Rome in the early third century. He taught that God was a single monad expanding into three manifestations for salvation. He famously compared God to the sun, a single essence projecting shape, light, and warmth (though orthodox theologians would also use this metaphor).

Arianism, in contrast, presents an opposite extreme. Arianism radically divides the Father and the Son, declaring the Son a lesser created being. Modalism, on the other hand, radically conflates Father and Son (and Spirit), declaring them the exact same being.

It’s often said that the Western Church begins with God’s oneness and tries to explain his threeness, whereas the Eastern Church begins with his threeness and tries to explain his oneness. This is an oversimplification, but it’s not without some merit. (The Western Church largely followed Augustine’s lead on the Trinity, compared to the East.) Consequently, Western Christians tend toward Modalism because they emphasize God’s oneness, whereas Eastern Christians have sometimes struggled with Arianism because of their emphasis on God’s threeness.

How is the Bible used to support Modalism?

While Modalism is heretical, it is not without support from Scripture.

Perhaps the most important verse in all the Old Testament, the Shema, declares unequivocally that God is one (Deut 6:4). So any doctrine of God based on the Bible has to safeguard this oneness. Modalists lean heavily on such passages that emphasize absolute monotheism, citing verses like Isaiah 44:6 (“besides me there is no God”) and Jesus’s own words in John 10:30 (“I and the Father are one”) and John 14:9 (“He who has seen me has seen the Father”).

This emphasis on God’s oneness runs throughout Scripture, allowing us to understand why some would teach Modalism.

Does Modalism align with the Bible?

The fatal flaw in Modalism is its inability to account for intra-Trinitarian interactions in Scripture. In other words, what do we do when the Father and Son and Spirit interact with each other as distinct, co-existing Persons? Modalism doesn’t have a sufficient answer.

Perhaps the greatest example is Jesus’s baptism (Matt 3:16–17; Mark 1:9–11), where the Father speaks, the Son is baptized, and the Spirit descends. In Modalism, only the Father, Son, or Spirit exists at any given moment—so when the Son is baptized, there is no Father to speak and no Spirit to descend. A Modalist account reduces this scene to God playacting or talking to himself, since only the Father, Son, or Spirit exists at any given moment. For the Modalist, the voice of the Father and the descending Spirit are “manifestations” of God, not distinct Persons. Since God is omnipresent, even during Jesus’s incarnation, he can speak from heaven and descend as a dove.

Besides Jesus’s baptism, other verses display distinct divine actors. For example:

• Genesis 1:1–2 shows the Spirit present at creation, contradicting the idea that God only operated as the Father in the Old Testament.
• In John 17, Christ prays to the Father. Modalists tend to interpret Jesus’s prayers as an internal struggle within Jesus rather than a genuine interaction with a distinct Person.
• Jesus promises to send the Holy Spirit in John 16, clearly distinguishing himself from the Spirit. Of Modalism, we may ask: Who is sending the Spirit? Does he send himself?

More broadly, any divine action attributed to a specific Person of God creates problems for Modalism. If the Spirit raises Jesus from the dead, then God must at that moment become the Spirit, meaning he is no longer Jesus. So is the risen Christ merely human, then? Has divinity departed from him? Modalism offers no coherent answer to these types of questions.

Launch your study of Modalism with Logos’s Factbook. Start a free trial!

Why is Modalism considered heresy?

One way to view heresy is that it’s a belief where, if it were true, salvation would be made impossible.

In this view, Modalism is indeed a heresy because it unravels the sacrificial nature of Jesus’s death. Scripture indicates that his sacrifice is offered to the Father and that the Spirit raises him from the dead. But in Modalism, to whom is his sacrifice offered, and who resurrects him? There is no one. This destroys the very mechanism of salvation, the Bible’s core teaching that Christ is our distinct representative with the Father.

Additionally, by abandoning the diversity of Persons in the Godhead, Modalism logically leads to Patripassianism, the teaching that God the Father suffered and died on the cross.

That said, salvation isn’t a function of having perfectly correct theology. That would amount to an intellectually oriented works righteousness, which is contrary to the gospel. Rather, salvation is based on union with the risen Christ.

How did the early church respond to Modalism?

The early Church Fathers responded aggressively to defend the truth. Hippolytus attacked the Modalists Noetus and Callistus. Most notably, Tertullian wrote Against Praxeas to refute Praxeas, a Modalist teacher. Tertullian famously declared that Praxeas had “put the Paraclete to flight and crucified the Father.”³⁹

Later, at the Council of Nicaea in 325, the issue was officially taken up. On one side, there were those who would come to be known as the Nicenes, who rejected Arianism. On the other side were the Arians, though they didn’t necessarily accept that name, as their position was far more diverse than “followers of Arius.” While the council was convened to respond to Arianism, many Arians accused their opponents of Modalism, making it a central issue, as well. The opponents of Arianism emphasized God’s oneness strongly, using terms such as homoousios (“same essence” or “same nature”). According to the Arians, this left the Trinitarian Persons not sufficiently distinguished. This charge did not hold, however, and the council refuted and condemned Modalism.

Does Modalism still exist today?

Yes and no. Modalism survives today, but typically not in the form that was seen in the early church.

What is Oneness Pentecostalism?

Versions of Modalism can be found in Oneness Pentecostalism and groups like the United Pentecostal Church. But contemporary Oneness theology tweaks ancient Modalism, often in very significant ways.

For instance, we should not describe Oneness Pentecostalism using the traditional “three masks” analogy, in which God is first the Father, then the Son, then the Spirit. Oneness Pentecostals explicitly reject this and affirm that God can manifest as Father, Son, and Spirit simultaneously because God is omnipresent.

In ancient Modalism, there’s no Father for the Son to speak to during his baptism or any of his prayers. Oneness believers argue that because God is not spatially limited to the incarnation, the Father can easily speak from heaven while God is incarnate in Jesus.

Likewise, they would reject any charges of Patripassianism. For them, God suffered in the flesh in Christ, rather than the Father suffering as the Father. This point actually helps us reach one of the central points of Oneness Pentecostalism: the incarnation. For them, the distinction between Father and Son is not a distinction between two divine Persons. Instead, it is a distinction between deity (the transcendent Father) and humanity (the man Christ Jesus). They do not view the Logos in John 1 as an eternally distinct divine Person. Rather, they see the Logos as the one God’s own self-expression, mind, or plan becoming flesh.

Oneness theologians have highly sophisticated biblicist arguments for their views. Instead of simply dismissing them with isolated proof texts, we ought to look at how Oneness writers interpret those specific verses.⁴⁰

Oneness Pentecostals sincerely worship Jesus as God and trust in his saving work, yet hold to heterodox theology of God.

Why is Modalism appealing to some?

Modalism remains appealing because it is the consummate “logical” heresy. It offers a simple way to protect God’s oneness without wrestling with complex metaphysical mysteries.

In fact, well-meaning Christians often accidentally teach Modalism through popular analogies. Have you ever heard that God is like water (ice, liquid, steam)? Have you heard God is like an actor wearing three different masks? Or like a man who is simultaneously a father, son, and brother? These analogies are Modalist. They describe one substance changing form or role, thereby depersonalizing the distinct, eternal identities of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Conclusion

The heart of the gospel is that Jesus offers us his relationship to his Father. When we experience the love of God, we are experiencing Trinitarian love that has always existed. We’re being invited into a relationship that has never been broken and never will be.

Modalism cannot offer this, though. With no co-existing Persons in the Trinity, there is no Father–Son relationship in the Godhead. In fact, there is no relationship of any kind within God. This makes for a lonely God with no relational stability to offer us.

As believers, we must protect the beautiful mystery of the Trinity.

Share your thoughts

Why do you think modalist accounts remain appealing? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for studying the Trinity

Saint Augustine: The Trinity (Fathers of the Church)

Regular price: $30.99

Add to cart

Tertullian against Praxeas

Regular price: $4.99

Add to cart

Festal Orations (Popular Patristics Series)

Regular price: $10.99

Add to cart

The Trinity

Regular price: $30.99

Add to cart

The Trinity: An Introduction (Short Studies in Systematic Theology)

Regular price: $11.99

Add to cart

The Biblical Trinity: Encountering the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in Scripture

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

The Deep Things of God: How the Trinity Changes Everything, 2nd ed.

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

40 Questions about the Trinity (40 Questions Series)

Regular price: $25.99

Add to cart

Mobile Ed: CH261 History of the Doctrine of the Trinity (10 hour course)

Regular price: $379.99

Add to cart

Mobile Ed: CH351 History of Heresies (7 hour course)

Regular price: $259.99

Add to cart

Related articles

• The Trinity 101: What Every Christian Should Know
• 11 Best Books on the Trinity (for All Levels of Study)
• Know Your Heresies: How Not to Be a Heretic
• 3 Terms about the Trinity You Should Know & How We Got Them
• How the Early Church Found the Trinity in the Old Testament

Kirk E. Miller welcomes New Testament scholar Patrick Schreiner on to What in the Word? to tackle the question: Why was Jesus baptized? John’s baptism was for repentant sinners, yet Jesus was without sin.

They discuss the different interpretations of Matthew 3:13–17, focusing on what it means for Jesus to “fulfill all righteousness.” What is meant by “righteousness,” and how does Jesus’s baptism “fulfill” it? Finally, they consider the significance of the Spirit’s descent and the heavenly voice declaring Jesus “my Son.”

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Episode guest: Patrick Schreiner

Patrick Schreiner (PhD, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) is Associate Professor of New Testament and biblical theology and Endowed Chair at Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary in Kansas City, MO. He is the author of many books, including the following:

• The Kingdom of God and the Glory of the Cross
• The Transfiguration of Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Reading
• The Ascension of Christ: Recovering a Neglected Doctrine
• The Visual Word: Illustrated Outlines of The New Testament Books
• The Four Gospels: Jesus, the Hope of the World
• Acts (Christian Standard Commentary)
• The Mission of the Triune God: A Theology of Acts (New Testament Theology)

• X
• Facebook

Episode synopsis

Why did Jesus need to be baptized?

John the Baptist was baptizing people for “repentance” (Matt 3:11), and those who received John’s baptism did so “confessing their sins” (Matt 3:6). So why does Jesus, who is without sin or need for repentance, have John baptize him (Matt 3:13–14)? And what does Jesus mean when he answers John’s protests by saying he must be baptized in order “to fulfill all righteousness” (Matt 3:15)? Of note, this line is unique to Matthew’s account, so how does it contribute to, and how might it be explained by, the rest of Matthew’s Gospel?

Finally, we might wonder what it means for Jesus to receive the Spirit at his baptism. Was he without the Spirit prior, and does God’s declaration that Jesus is his “beloved” Son imply an adoptionist Christology (the idea that Jesus was merely a man who was elevated to divine status)?

Matthew’s concern with Jesus’s identity

In his infancy narrative (chs. 1–2), Matthew seeks to answer the question, Who is Jesus? He begins with a genealogy that situates Jesus within the story of Israel: son of David, son of Abraham. He provides his answer through a series of fulfillment quotations (Matt 1:18–2:23).

As Matthew continues, we find Jesus walking in the footsteps of Israel, reflecting her experience in his own. As Patrick Schreiner explains, Jesus comes out of Egypt, passes through water (Matt 3:1–17), goes into the wilderness for forty days (recalling Israel’s forty years of temptation in the wilderness; Matt 4:1–11), and then ascends a mountain to deliver an exposition of the law, the Sermon on the Mount (Matt 5:1). All of it echoes Israel’s own journey in the Pentateuch. Jesus is messiah who has come to represent his people. He recapitulates Israel’s story in order to do what Israel could not.

In this context, Jesus’s baptism functions, then, as his identification and anointing as that messiah: this is the moment where Jesus is formally set apart and empowered for his public ministry. In the Old Testament, prophets, priests, and kings were anointed with oil and empowered by the Spirit for their God-given tasks (e.g., 1 Sam 16:13). So here the Spirit descends upon Jesus and the Father speaks, declaring his messianic identity.

Jesus identifies with Israel and Israel’s need for repentance

By receiving baptism, Jesus is not confessing sin, as if he himself were in need of repentance. (John’s resistance reflects this; see Matt 3:14.) Rather, Jesus is identifying with sinful Israel and her need for repentance. John’s call to repentance was addressed to a nation that had broken covenant and needed to return to God. Jesus, by entering these waters, confirms John’s message and participates in Israel’s act of turning back to God. He aligns himself with those he has come to represent and save.

Patrick also suggests, however, that Jesus’s baptism here previews the cross—the climax of Matthew’s Gospel—where Jesus will die. In the Old Testament, waters often function as a symbol of judgment. Think of Noah’s flood, where the waters of God’s wrath swept over a sinful world. So Jesus, by undergoing baptism, shows how he will take Israel’s sins upon himself and undergo God’s judgment in their place.

In these ways, Jesus’s baptism is not an isolated event at the start of his ministry. It is a window into the entire purpose of that ministry. Jesus is effectively announcing, from the very beginning, what he has come to do.

“To fulfill all righteousness”? 2 views

Fittingly, then, Jesus’s very first words in Matthew’s Gospel consist of his explanation for being baptized: “to fulfill all righteousness” (Matt 3:15). This phrase brings together two of Matthew’s most important concepts, fulfillment and righteousness, further indicating how Jesus’s baptism sets the tone for the whole of his ensuing ministry.

But what exactly does it mean for Jesus “to fulfill all righteousness”? Patrick outlines two interpretations.

1. Ethical righteousness

One common understanding is that Jesus was baptized to complete (fulfill) all aspects of the Father’s will for him (righteousness).

In favor of this view, righteousness often does carry an ethical sense in Matthew. For instance, in the Sermon on the Mount Jesus calls for a “righteousness” that “surpasses that of the scribes and Pharisees” (Matt 5:20) and says “not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them” (Matt 6:1). In these passages, righteousness refers to moral conduct or moral virtue. On this reading, Jesus submits to baptism as an act of necessary obedience to God.

Patrick agrees with what this first view affirms, but he believes “to fulfill all righteousness” conveys something additional.

2. Eschatological righteousness

In the Old Testament, God’s righteousness often functions coterminously with God’s saving activity. So, for instance, in passages like Isaiah 46:13 and Psalm 98:2, God’s righteousness stands parallel to his salvation. His salvation is a demonstration of his righteousness. Righteousness in such texts is not a mere ethical concept, but an eschatological reality—the eventual in-breaking of God’s saving purposes.

We see a similar use of righteousness in Matthew’s Gospel where righteousness is placed alongside God’s eschatological kingdom: “Seek first his kingdom and his righteousness” (Matt 6:33). This pairing, Patrick argues, indicates that righteousness here has an eschatological and redemptive flavor.

Furthermore, throughout his Gospel, Matthew typically uses fulfill and fulfillment in an eschatological sense. In Matthew, Jesus fulfills the Scripture, bringing its story to its appointed eschatological completion.

So, especially as these two words occur together (“to fulfill all righteousness”), Patrick believes Jesus announces that his entire ministry—beginning with, and foreshadowed in, his baptism—will accomplish God’s eschatological salvation that the Old Testament foretold and that Israel could not produce on her own. Jesus’s baptism, in other words, is the opening movement of God’s eschatological rescue operation.

In short, Patrick agrees, yes, Jesus completes the Father’s will (view #1). But that is specifically to bring about salvation for his people (view #2).

Didn’t Jesus already have the Spirit?

If Jesus is the eternal Son of God, and there has never been any separation among members of the Trinity, why does the Spirit need to come upon him at his baptism?

Although Jesus is one person, he possesses two natures, divine and human. Thus, as Patrick explains, Jesus receives the Spirit here with respect to his humanity to empower him for his new and uniquely incarnate ministry. Just as the Spirit came upon prophets and kings in the Old Testament to empower them for their specific callings, so Jesus, as God’s appointed messiah, receives the Spirit to be anointed for his.

Why does God declare Jesus his “beloved Son”?

God’s declaration “This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased” weaves together at least two Old Testament texts:

• Isaiah 42:1, which anticipates a Spirit-anointed figure in whom God delights who will bring righteousness to the nations.
• Psalm 2:7, a royal enthronement psalm in which its Davidic king is declared God’s begotten Son.

Patrick also notes that “my beloved son” may echo Genesis 22:2, where Abraham is told to take “your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love,” who then was nearly sacrificed.

Thus, when God declares that Jesus his beloved Son, he is declaring that Jesus is the Christ, the anointed king, the Spirit-filled servant, and his Son bound for sacrifice. (See also where God makes this same declaration of Jesus at his transfiguration; Matt 17:5.)

Interestingly, whereas Mark and Luke read “You are my beloved Son” (emphasis added), Matthew uses language that sounds more like a public announcement: “This is my beloved Son” (emphasis added). Patrick suggests that this change fits Matthew’s broader purpose of establishing Jesus’s identity as the Messiah.

Practical significance of Jesus’s baptism

Matthew’s Gospel opens with baptism (Jesus’s) and ends with baptism (the Great Commission). At the end of the Gospel, the risen Jesus commands his disciples to make disciples, baptizing them “in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit” (Matt 28:19), the same three persons present at Jesus’s baptism in Matthew 3.

Patrick explains, Jesus went under the waters of judgment on our behalf. So in Christian baptism, we imitate Christ’s own baptism by identifying with that death to sin and resurrection to new life.

Second, Jesus’s baptism displays the gospel. It is a window through which to see exactly what Jesus came to do. The Gospels, like Matthew’s, are not ethical manuals, primarily giving us things to do. They are presentations of the gospel, the good news of what Jesus has done for us. The account of Jesus’s baptism is no exception to this.

Advice for teaching and preaching

Which is why we must resist the temptation to read this passage in isolation from the rest of Matthew’s Gospel. Jesus’s baptism makes far less sense without the infancy narrative behind it and the passion narrative ahead of it. Teachers and preachers should attend to the way Matthew casts Jesus as recapitulating Israel’s story—and so here in his baptism. Jesus is the new Israel who succeeds where the old Israel failed. Likewise they should read Jesus’s baptism in light of where Matthew’s book is heading: the cross. There he will undergo a baptism of death, thereby accomplishing (fulfilling) eschatological salvation (righteousness).

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

What does it mean for Jesus to “fulfill all righteousness”? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Patrick Schreiner’s suggested resources on Matthew

France, R. T. Matthew: Evangelist and Teacher. Wipf and Stock, 2004.

Matthew (New Word Biblical Themes: New Testament)

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

Matthew, Disciple and Scribe: The First Gospel and Its Portrait of Jesus

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

The Gospel of the Son of God: An Introduction to Matthew

Regular price: $26.99

Add to cart

Further resources on Matthew

Matthew: Evangelical Biblical Theology Commentary (EBTC)

Regular price: $53.99

Add to cart

The Gospel of Matthew (The New International Commentary on the New Testament | NICNT)

Regular price: $79.99

Add to cart

The Gospel of Matthew: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary

Regular price: $67.99

Add to cart

Matthew, Volumes 1-3 (International Critical Commentary | ICC)

Regular price: $71.99

Add to cart

Related content

• Saved through Baptism: A Typology of Immersion Starting with the Flood
• The Spirit of the Lord Is upon Me: How This Prophecy Applies to Jesus
• Everything You Need to Know About the Davidic Covenant
• How to Read the Gospels: Moving Beyond Individual Stories
• 1 Jesus, 4 Portraits: Why You Need Each Gospel’s Narrative Theology

Every pastor I know agrees that visiting church members in their homes is a good thing to do. Generally, none would dispute that a shepherd should do his best to know the sheep in his flock. But are pastoral visits a prescribed practice? Are they scripturally necessary or simply beneficial?

Contrary to modern pastoral instincts, early Protestant pastors believed they were duty-bound by Scripture to teach “from house to house” (Acts 20:20), as Paul seems to commend to the elders of the Church of Ephesus. Other passages seem to describe an apostolic pattern. Peter exhorted elders to maintain some kind of relational proximity: “Shepherd the flock of God that is among you” (1 Pet 5:2). Church leaders are described as those who “will give an account” for watching over the souls entrusted to their care (Heb 13:17). Their accounting and reward (cf. 1 Pet 5:4) will come from the Chief Shepherd, whose earthly ministry exemplified knowledgeable care of his flock: “I am the good shepherd. I know my own and my own know me” (John 10:14).

Jesus personally knows, names, and cares for each of his sheep, and he delegates watchful care of these sheep to local church under-shepherds, all of whom will give an account to Jesus for the kind of care they provided. Consequently, every under-shepherd in Christ’s church is bound by Scripture to personally know the sheep in their flock and apply knowledgeable spiritual care to them.

Paul’s apostolic practice of visitation, therefore, is at least instructive, if not prescriptive. Pastoral visits are a prudent practice commended by Scripture through which pastors⁴¹ may fulfill their vocation to personally know, instruct, and care for every member in their congregation.

With this foundation in place, what follows are ten practical suggestions for how pastors might conduct these visits faithfully and well.⁴²

1. Determine a reasonable frequency

Factor your church’s size relative to the available pastors (both paid and unpaid) to determine a reasonable timeframe within which to visit every household.

Then consider how frequently you should visit each household, keeping in mind that some members may require more visits than others. Does your goal leave room to prioritize those sheep with greater needs, and if so, how often should those visits occur?

2. Establish a schedule

Once reasonable goals are in place, consider building a schedule for pastoral visits.

In my church, for example, we built a spreadsheet with eleven consecutive one-month “periods” for pastoral visits. Each period is filled with a certain number of households to visit, ordered alphabetically according to our membership directory.

The beginning and end of each of these periods corresponds with a monthly member-focused elder’s meeting (which alternates with our business-focused meetings). In these meetings, we exclusively discuss and pray for the members we visited during the previous period and assign visits for the next period. Paid pastors (like myself) take two or three visits per period for every one made by a “lay” (unpaid) elder, with the goal of visiting each household at least once per year.

Because ministry mimics life, our schedule is flexible. Throughout the year, new members are added and old members resign. New needs arise and former needs abate. Some households are visited more frequently, while others, less so. In any given year, we may need more or fewer periods to visit everyone. While the schedule may be subject to change, we dare not abandon it, as it helps us stay watchful over every saint entrusted to our care.

3. Give advanced notice

When it comes to executing the visits, don’t just pop in. Give members an opportunity to prepare their homes and to consider how your visit will be most useful to them.

As an example, we send emails to members in advance, asking about their availability and making the intent of the visit clear.

4. Be informal

Abandon scripts and agendas. Remember that these beloved saints are inviting you into their homes. Enjoy their hospitality and resist the urge to take charge of the meeting. Instead, lower your expectations. Simplify your goals.

Take time to share stories, laugh together, and update one another on life’s happenings. In other words, conduct your meetings with little pastoral authority and much familial affection.

5. Come with spiritual intention

Remember, informal does not mean unintentional. Our members know in advance that I intend to minister to them in word and prayer.

That said, I am not a private investigator sleuthing secret sins, nor do I come as a spiritual fruit inspector to see if their lives are “up to code.” Rather, I come with a simple, twofold goal:

1. Remind them of the good news of Jesus Christ and
2. join them in drawing near to the throne of grace.

6. Show genuine interest

I remember a mentor of mine who, before he met with church members, would pray, “Lord, make me interested in them.” His passing comment has stuck with me for twenty years.

Sadly, in the course of a busy ministry schedule, pastoral visitations can become little more than boxes to be checked on a long list of to-dos. But pastors more than anyone should exercise a curious care for each member that’s eager to see the ways in which God is at work in them.

7. Adopt different postures for different saints

We should regard every communing church member (or member “in good standing”) as beloved by Christ and indwelt by his Spirit. Consider that the Apostle Paul repeatedly addresses fellow believers as “brothers” and “sisters,” and postures himself pastorally as a “nursing mother” (1 Thess 2:7–8) and “a father with his children” (1 Thess 2:11–12). So too should be the posture of every pastor toward each member of God’s household. The posture of our pastoral visits—the manner in which we relate to each saint—should be one of familial affection.

Yet we also acknowledge that not every saint requires the same kind of care. Pastors ought to offer care specifically attuned to each member’s spiritual condition and personal circumstances. Although not exhaustive, consider the different postures needed for the following sub-categories of saint:

i. Straying saints

Some members may be noticeably absent from the church’s gathering for extended periods of time. Reasons for such absences abound, and not all involve sin. Whatever the reason, one of Christ’s sheep has wandered away from the flock, and a good shepherd reflects godly care by pursuing them and carefully bringing them back (Ezek 34:16; Luke 15:3–7; 1 Pet 2:25).

ii. Sinning saints

Pastors should assume of every member what is true in himself: They are new creations (2 Cor 5:17) with indwelling sin (Rom 7:20–21) that require regular encouragement against the deceitfulness of sin (Heb 3:13). Tragically, like the widows under Timothy’s care, some sheep will “stray after Satan” into various kinds of sin (1 Tim 5:15). For these saints, scriptural reproof and correction may be necessary (2 Tim 3:16). And because they are God’s children, the pastor does well to assume that the indwelling Spirit is greater than their sin, and that he will prepare them (though, perhaps, not immediately) to receive godly rebuke (Heb 12:5–6; Prov 9:8; 12:1; 15:31–32).

iii. Suffering saints

If every saint in this present age is a sinner, then every saint is also a sufferer. Insofar as no congregation is without a suffering saint, no pastor is without a ministry of encouragement and comfort. Setting an example for his flock, he must “visit widows and orphans in their affliction” (Jas 1:27). His visits include praying (Jas 5:13), comforting (2 Cor 1:3–4), sympathizing (1 Pet 3:8), encouraging (1 Thess 5:14), providing (1 John 3:17), and reminding (especially of their resurrection hope; 1 Cor 15).

iv. Shut-in saints

Many churches will also have members who are prevented from gathering with the church due to chronic illness, a lengthy recovery, a permanent disability, or age. Such saints seem to fit James’s exhortation for the “elders of the church” to “pray over … the one who is sick” (Jas 5:14–15). Sadly, due to their indefinite absence from the church’s regular gatherings, shut-in saints are easily overlooked or forgotten. Since they cannot gather with the congregation, pastors should minister to them regularly (perhaps even weekly) by means of pastoral visits.

8. Provide tactful care

Pastors should bring the aroma of Christ into homes with him. Our Lord Jesus does not break bruised reeds or quench smoldering wicks (Matt 12:20; cf. Isa 42:3). Neither should we.

Our posture toward his sheep should mirror his lowliness and gentleness (Matt 11:29): straying saints follow him; sinning saints turn to him; suffering saints find comfort in him; and shut-in saints hope in him.

9. Keep visits short—but allow for more time when necessary

Pastors need to provide just enough time for members to open up (which takes more or less time, depending on the member), but not so much time that any one visit monopolizes your schedule and prevents you from showing the necessary care for every member.

That said, some members will inevitably need more time than you planned. I recall many times when a member shared something important or broke down in tears only minutes before I planned to pray and leave. So be flexible.

10. Plan follow-ups as needed

And, if necessary, schedule another meeting soon.

In the course of your visitations, sins will be confessed, marital or parenting issues will be revealed, or heartbreaking news will be shared, requiring one or more follow-up meetings.

Depending on the immediacy of the need or severity of the issue, in our practice we may add that household in the next visitation period, or even multiple consecutive periods, shuffling the schedule as needed.

Conclusion

Pastoral visitations are a prudent practice governed by the general principles of Scripture concerning the relationship between a church’s shepherds and its members. Application of these principles will differ from church to church, depending upon ministry context, membership makeup, and the leadership of each church. But whatever form it takes in your church, the ultimate goal is to see knowledgeable leaders intentionally shepherding those for whom they will one day give an account.

May the Lord give all his under-shepherds great grace for such a great task!

Share your thoughts

How does your church handle pastoral visitations? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further reflection

Pastoral Visitation: For the Care of Souls (Lexham Ministry Guides)

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

Pastoral Visitation: A Pocket Manual

Regular price: $8.99

Add to cart

The Reformed Pastor, Updated and Abridged ed.

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

The Book of Pastoral Rule (Popular Patristics Series)

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

The Shepherd Leader: Achieving Effective Shepherding in Your Church

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

Classical Pastoral Care: Crisis Ministries

Regular price: $16.99

Add to cart

Related content

• How to Plan a Pastoral Hospital Visit
• Unpacking Elders and Deacons, Shepherds and Servants of the Church
• Servant-Leadership: How Jesus Redefines Greatness
• Go Beyond the Pulpit. Pastor While “Walking Around.”
• Why Protestant Pastors Should Read a Catholic Pope on Pastoral Ministry

While the landscape of theological education has changed significantly over the last decade, with fewer people pursuing a master of divinity degree (MDiv), there seems to be a steady increase in the number of people who are seeking a doctor of ministry degree (DMin), in particular.

In the world of Christian ministry, those seeking an advanced doctoral degree have one of two program options: a doctor of ministry or a doctor of philosophy (PhD). At Baylor University’s Truett Seminary, where I serve on faculty, I often find myself reflecting on these two options since I have the privilege of teaching students in both the DMin and PhD in preaching programs.

To help you deliberate between the two, we’ll begin by identifying some of the distinctives and advantages of each degree offering and conclude by considering motivations for pursuing a doctorate.

Understanding the degrees

Let’s begin by considering the nature of each degree—and their differences.

What is a doctor of ministry?

The doctor of ministry degree (DMin) is a professional doctoral degree for pastors/practitioners who typically serve as a minister/church leader in a local congregation. While research is involved and expected, the primary emphasis or audience of your DMin degree is not to furnish the academy with a significant corpus of “original research.”

A DMin program includes coursework (often one course per semester or per year) spread out over two or three academic years. Each institution has different requirements on the number of courses/seminars they expect.

After completing your coursework, students write a dissertation project in the area of their interest and specialization, normally by concentrating on their current church context, community, or denomination. This dissertation project caters toward ministry practice/praxis and application of your exploration. In my supervision of DMin dissertation projects, I often coach my students to conclude with a practical workshop or model that they can offer other pastors/church leaders to implement within their own contexts.

What is a doctor of philosophy?

The doctor of philosophy (PhD) is an academic, more theoretical/conceptual research degree culminating in a significant body of “original research” that advances theory for the academy and sometimes with implications for the church-at-large.

In the United States, the PhD degree also involves two or three years of coursework prior to writing the dissertation. In the United Kingdom, the PhD is primarily a dissertation-only process where students may audit courses relevant to their subject matter. But their sole responsibility, from the start, is to write their dissertation.

The PhD dissertation is considered “an original contribution to knowledge” that furthers the field of study. The designation of “original contribution” means that the student has written a dissertation that is deemed by experts in the field to be “new knowledge.”

While the emphasis of PhD dissertations will differ depending on one’s area of specialization, many PhD dissertations in theology and religious studies advance the subject matter both theoretically and even practically. In my coaching of PhD dissertation students, I encourage them to write for the academy (in my case, homileticians) with an eye toward the church (to increase its readability and make it beneficial for church leaders as well).

Understanding their advantages

What are the distinct benefits of these respective degrees?

What are the advantages of a DMin degree?

What I appreciate most about the DMin degree is the cohort-based learning model done in community. In most DMin programs, you will learn as a cohort of several students (ministry professionals) who take the exact same courses/seminars over a period of two or three years. During these seminars, you get to know your instructor and classmates quite well. Over the years, I have witnessed many DMin classmates become lifelong friends and ministry partners, which is a beautiful thing to see.

Academically, the DMin degree can be a rigorous program where courses involve significant reading of literature in the given field of study, where students write reflective and integrative papers, and where students teach and lead workshops/discussions with fellow students in their cohort.

Professionally, the DMin degree may open up opportunities for you to write popular-level articles and books for the church. It may lead to greater leadership breaks in your denomination. Getting a DMin may provide occasions for you to teach or lecture as an adjunct professor at your local Bible college or seminary.

Nota bene: Not all DMin programs are the same. Some programs are more rigorous than others. In particular, DMin programs that are completely online will not have the same interpersonal, relational benefits as in-person, cohort-based models. A DMin degree will not automatically lead to a tenure-track teaching position or to book contracts.

What are the advantages of a PhD degree?

What I found most helpful in doing the PhD degree is that it taught me how to think critically, engage in research more appropriately and deeply, and to write more clearly and effectively. The PhD is intended to create scholars, researchers, thinkers, and writers who will be self-motivated to engage in rigorous research and scholarship in perpetuity. As you well know, the PhD is the “calling card” and the minimum threshold to teach in academic circles. It is also the “calling card” to be able to write academic books for the classroom.

Academically, a rigorous PhD program trains you, first and foremost, to become a critical thinker. You learn how to identify gaps in the literature and gaps in others’ methods and processes. It trains you to be well-read in your field of study and to be able to contribute knowledge to that field. A good PhD supervisor will teach you how to research and write effectively and to be able to converse effectively with scholars in your field.

Professionally, the PhD program is the minimum standard for applying to a university or seminary teaching position in your subject area. Having a PhD, as you know, does not automatically grant you a teaching position, though not having one will usually disqualify you from being considered. Getting a PhD will probably get your foot in the door to teach as an adjunct at your local college or seminary, and may give you a leg up in the publishing process if you are seeking to write for the academy and/or the church.

Nota bene: Like the DMin, not all PhD programs are the same. Some programs are shorter in years and less educationally demanding, while others are longer and more academically rigorous. Some have different emphases than others, that is, purely theoretical/conceptual vs. theoretical/practical. PhD programs in the US can also be cohort-based with an emphasis on learning in community, while PhDs in the UK are often done in isolation and launch immediately into writing your dissertation (PhD thesis in the UK).

Understanding your motivations

Now, if I may speak honestly and directly for a moment, let me briefly address the elephant in the room: your motivation.

Over the last fifteen years of teaching in a seminary context, I have had countless conversations with students who ask whether they should pursue a doctorate, and subsequently which doctorate makes the most sense for them. One of the most significant questions I can ask as a theological educator: Why do you want to pursue a doctoral degree?

3 questions to consider

If you believe confidently that God is calling you to start doctoral studies, I am not here to stop you from following God’s calling on your life. But let me ask a few probing, introspective questions as you continue on your intellectual journey:

1. What will a doctoral degree help you accomplish in your vocational ministry that you could not do without it? In all honesty, a DMin or a PhD is not going to necessarily help you become a better pastor or preacher. Getting a DMin may assist you with continuing your education to grow as a ministry practitioner. Getting a PhD may help you become a more critical thinker, scholar, and writer. Neither degree will inevitably help you to become a better teacher/instructor.

2. Is your primary motivation for getting a doctoral degree for the title, respect, or even self-congratulations? I leave this for you to do some serious heart work. Ask yourself if your answer to this question is in the affirmative. If so, I would suggest that you pause and pray and ask the Lord for the right motivations and whether this is truly what God wants or something your flesh craves.

3. Will this degree enable you to fulfill your calling as a writer, scholar, or teacher? If you feel called by God to write, do research, or teach, whether full-time or part-time, then perhaps this is the direction you should go. If God opens doors, then by all means, if done prayerfully, perhaps you should take a step through that door. Getting an acceptance, however, does not mean you must walk through the door!

Conclusion

In this article, I have briefly laid out some distinctives for both the doctor of ministry and doctor of philosophy degrees. We have also acknowledged some advantages for each doctoral degree. Lastly, we have asked ourselves some motivational questions for whether we should pursue a doctorate or not.

Let me cut to the chase: If your goal is to teach full-time in a Bible college, theological seminary, or divinity school, or to have access to writing academic books, then the PhD is probably the more appropriate degree for you. If your goal is to grow in knowledge and be a more effective pastor/practitioner for your local congregation and be able to write and teach on the side, then the DMin is probably a more appropriate degree for you. If your goal is simply to hear Dr. _______ or to get recognition or a promotion, neither degree is right for you.

Since God does know the right path for you, read again these familiar words from Proverbs 3:5–6: “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding. In all your ways submit to him, and he will make your paths straight.”

Share your thoughts

What else should someone consider when weighing the DMin vs. PhD? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further reflection

From Topic to Thesis: A Guide to Theological Research

Regular price: $10.99

Add to cart

Doing Theological Research: An Introductory Guide for Survival in Theological Education

Regular price: $11.99

Add to cart

The Pastor as Public Theologian: Reclaiming a Lost Vision

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

The Pastor as Scholar & The Scholar as Pastor: Reflections on Life and Ministry

Regular price: $8.99

Add to cart

Related content

• The Importance of Theological Education | Albert Mohler
• Where Is Theological Education Heading? Flexible Faithfulness
• 8 Tips for Finding a Thesis or Dissertation Topic
• Applying for a Doctoral Program? 7 Essential Tips

Scottish pastor Robert Murray M’Cheyne (1813–1843) is often quoted as saying, “The greatest need of my people is my own holiness.”⁴³ Or as the Apostle Paul commanded Timothy, “Set an example for the believers in speech, in conduct, in love, in faith and in purity … Watch your life and doctrine closely” (1 Tim 4:12, 16 NIV).

But what does personal holiness look like when we are going through a spiritually dry season?

Anyone who has been pastoring for any length of time can relate to this question. We want to bring zeal to the pulpit. When we meet with people, we want to be in tune with God’s Spirit. We want to have wisdom to offer. When we lead meetings, we want to know the joy of the Lord and facilitate them with gladness and confidence.

But we don’t always feel this way. When we pray, we feel nothing. When we read Scripture, it feels like a dead letter, mere words on a page. As we preach, we look out and sense a dullness in the room. We sense something’s not landing. We teach faith and yet appear to lack it ourselves.

So what does it look like to have faith and minister God’s grace when our own lives are spiritually dry?

What is spiritual dryness?

Spiritual dryness is not quite the same as experiencing desolation while facing a trial. Each is difficult and meant to bring us to the foot of the Cross, but they are not the same.

The Puritans had terms for such periods of dryness. They called them “dark nights of the soul” or “spiritual desertions.” As Peter Lewis explains, by this the Puritans “did not mean that God had truly deserted the elect soul but describe the experience … in which the ‘lively’ sense of God’s presence and favorable share or ‘interest’ in it was denied to the Christian.”⁴⁴

How to minister while spiritually dry

We might immediately think, Of course, this happens to normal church members, but surely not to pastors? Isn’t the whole point of our calling to remind people of God’s love through Jesus Christ? Surely, pastors must be precisely those who experience God’s presence in their daily lives.

When we experience periods of dryness, we may doubt our vocation and wonder whether we should either resign or do something radical until we once again experience the joy and peace of God in our daily lives.

To answer that, I offer the following thoughts and remedies:

1. Perceive that seasons of dryness are normal

Times of spiritual dryness or doubt are a normal part of the pilgrimage for many leaders in Scripture:

• Job was the most righteous man of his time, and yet he endured thirty-eight chapters of desolation and suffering before God answered.
• David cried out to God in the Psalms, “How long, O Lord? Will you forget me forever? How long will you hide your face from me?” (Ps 13:1; cf. Ps 42, 43, 73, 77, 88).
• Elijah fled in despair after his victory on Mt. Carmel before God came to him in a “still small voice” (1 Kgs 19:12 KJV).
• Paul experienced periods of great anxiety and weakness (2 Cor).
• Ecclesiastes and Lamentations are entire books devoted to the subject of faith in the face of doubt and despair.
• Even the Lord Jesus, in his human flesh, experienced God’s absence at Gethsemane (Mark 14:32–42) and on the cross (Mark 15:34).

The first thing to do when you experience an extended period of dryness is to recognize that what you are going through is not without precedent in Scripture. If you have these seasons, it does not mean you are crazy or disqualified from ministry or necessarily doing anything wrong. It means you are normal.

2. Prize them as part of God’s sanctifying process

One of the dangers we face when we are “on fire” spiritually is that we can become arrogant and, in effect, preach our own experience rather than the unchanging grace of God. When we describe our close intimacy with God and all our answered prayers, we can end up discouraging those who are struggling—or worse, point them to ourselves rather than to Christ.

But when we go through periods of dryness, it humbles us. It causes us to seek a renewed relationship with God himself rather than his felt blessings. As one Puritan put it,

God is a tender father, and he would have all the love of his children. He would not have his children to love their nurse more than himself: our joy and peace and comfort is but the nurse of our graces. Now when God sees that his children fall in love more with the nurse than with himself, then he removes the nurse, and causes their peace to be suspended and interrupted.⁴⁵

In this way, we see that under God’s sovereign care, times of spiritual dryness can be just as sanctifying as times of bliss. To paraphrase another Puritan, for our good we are sometimes given strong communications of God’s presence, and for our good at other times we are denied them. All things work out together for good (Rom 8:28)—and that includes seasons of dryness.

3. Preach Jesus, not yourself

But how do we keep ministering to God’s people when our own tanks are empty? This is not the article to remind leaders to be mindful of their own spiritual health—to take Sabbaths, to stay in the Word and prayer and close fellowship. But say you are doing all those things and still coming up empty? How do you keep ministering to others?

I have one simple remedy: Preach Jesus, not yourself (cf. 2 Cor 4:5).

Evangelicals in particular can sometimes struggle with this since we strongly emphasize the need for individual faith, for everyone to have a personal encounter with Christ. But this can sometimes lead us to make that personal experience central rather than Christ himself. We forget what Peter wrote in his letter to the Christians of Asia Minor:

Though you have not seen [Jesus], you love him; and even though you do not see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an inexpressible and glorious joy, for you are receiving the end result of your faith, the salvation of your souls. (1 Pet 1:8–9 NIV)

None of these believers had seen Jesus, and yet they still loved him. In the same way, when we don’t “see Jesus” through our felt experiences of him, we are still to love him. Our ultimate hope has not changed. We are still receiving the goal of our faith, the salvation of our souls.

This is one reason why Paul rebuked the Corinthians for prizing strong leaders who excelled in their speaking skills and other visible spiritual gifts. Paul reminds us instead to “fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen” (2 Cor 4:18 NIV).

In ministry, this means focusing, not on our own experience, but on the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. He is the one who saves us by his grace, and nothing can separate us from his love (Rom 8:31–39), including our own lack of felt spiritual experience.

This is one reason why the sacraments (or ordinances) of Christ are so powerful and helpful. As I have often told my colleagues, I can mess up a sermon, I can mess up the liturgy, and I can misspeak after worship. But I cannot mess up the Lord’s Supper, because it is Christ himself being offered in the bread and wine. When it is celebrated, Christ is present—always. Preach Christ.

4. Persevere in Christ

Finally, as Winston Churchill famously said in a speech to his old school, “Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never.”⁴⁶ Or to quote the book of Hebrews,

Do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward. For you have need of endurance, so that you may do the will of God and receive what is promised. … we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and keep their souls. (Heb 10:35–36, 39 RSV)

Periods of spiritual dryness are those periods when we most show our faith, precisely because we do not feel the benefit of it. As C. S. Lewis reminds us in The Screwtape Letters, “the prayers offered in the state of dryness are those which please [God] best.”⁴⁷ In these times, we learn to set our minds on things above, not things below (Col 3:2). We declare God to be good and true, simply because he says he is.

That is faith. And as they say, that’ll preach.

Share your thoughts

How can one minister while spiritually dry? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Christopher Hutchinson recommended resources

• Lewis, Peter. The Genius of Puritanism. Carey Publications, 1977.
• Rosenbladt, Rod. “The Gospel for Those Broken by the Church.” 1517 (blog), February 2, 2017.
• Keller, Timothy. Walking with God Through Pain and Suffering. Penguin Books, 2015.

Work Of The Pastor

Regular price: $5.99

Add to cart

The Bruised Reed (Audio)

Regular price: $19.95

Add to cart

In Christ Alone: Living the Gospel-Centered Life

Regular price: $10.99

Add to cart

Rediscovering Humility: Why the Way Up is Down

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

Additional resources for further encouragement

Spiritual Depression: Its Causes and Cures

Regular price: $7.99

Add to cart

Overcoming the Darkness: Biblical Help for Spiritual Depression

Regular price: $7.79

Add to cart

The Case and Cure of a Deserted Soul

Regular price: $11.99

Add to cart

A Lifting Up for the Downcast (Audio)

Regular price: $24.95

Add to cart

When the Darkness Will Not Lift: Doing What We Can While We Wait for God—And Joy

Regular price: $5.99

Add to cart

Dark Clouds, Deep Mercy: Discovering the Grace of Lament

Regular price: $10.99

Add to cart

Good News at Rock Bottom: Finding God When the Pain Goes Deep and Hope Seems Lost

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

When God Seems Distant: Surprising Ways God Deepens Our Faith and Draws Us Near

Regular price: $21.99

Add to cart

Related articles

• 5 Ways to Prevent Pastoral Burnout
• Pastor, Sharpen Your Axe: Why & How to Take a Sabbatical
• Don’t Go Alone: Why Ministry Leaders Need a Good Shepherd Too
• Faithful Ministry Begins with Attending to One’s Soul
• What Is Friendship—and Can Pastors Find It in the Church?

I remain convinced that it is more important than ever for local congregations in the same city to partner together in meaningful ways.⁴⁸ In this short article, I’d like to go to Scripture to make a case for this claim, and then suggest a few practical ways for churches and their leaders to start working for closer local partnerships.

Why build and maintain local church partnerships?

Scripture gives us both a theological foundation and apostolic model for partnering with other local churches.

Our union together in Christ

Church partnerships begin with the recognition that there is one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church. By this we don’t mean the Roman Catholic Church or any particular denomination. Instead, we acknowledge, in the words of Ephesians 4,

there is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to one hope when you were called; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. (Eph 4:4–6 NIV)

Unless you think that your local congregation is the only true church in town, then you have to acknowledge this reality: Your brothers and sisters in the Baptist or Presbyterian or Bible church down the road are part of the same body of Christ. Assuming that they believe the gospel of Jesus Christ and proclaim that faithfully, we have a deeper unity with fellow churches in our area than we often realize. You share a profound unity and union with them because you are all joined to the risen and reigning Messiah Jesus.

This is no small thing. You share a closer union with the church in your town that may have different music, liturgy, and even language than with any of your own family members who may not know Jesus. Our profound union together in Christ is the foundation for our partnership with other local congregations. Once we see this objective unity, we should be compelled to flesh this out in local relationships.

Paul’s Jerusalem collection

But Scripture doesn’t just give us the theological foundation for church partnerships. It gives us a model. Paul’s ministry is an example of churches partnering to serve one another. Beginning with the agreement among the apostles to “remember the poor” (Gal 2:10), Paul organized a collection from the churches in Asia Minor, Macedonia, and beyond to help provide for the needy in the Church of Jerusalem.⁴⁹

In 2 Corinthians 8, we get a window into the theological foundations and practical outworking of this partnership. Again, the foundation of this partnership is Jesus himself and the grace of God given in him (2 Cor 8:9). On the basis of their shared union in Christ, there is an opportunity for shared participation in the ministry to the saints (2 Cor 8:4). Paul encouraged the churches to band together to help address the needs of the poor saints in Jerusalem. He reminded the Church of Corinth how churches in Macedonia had made significant sacrifices to contribute to this collection, and he encouraged them toward the same giving (2 Cor 8:2–3).

Shortly before he finally traveled to Jerusalem to deliver this collection from the churches, Paul wrote to the Church of Rome, asking them to pray for his work and telling them that he was going to deliver this gift from the churches of Macedonia and Achaia. He says of this partnership, “They were pleased to do it, and indeed they owe it to them” (Rom 15:27 NIV). The bottom line is that when we understand the reality of our union together, our partnership with fellow churches is both a joy and an obligation.

Once we recognize this, the question becomes, How can we do this well?

How to build and maintain local church partnerships

Many pastors have encouraged their congregations to “become who you already are,” that is, to live into the reality of your union with Christ. A similar encouragement applies to pastors within the same region: Become who you already are—together. Live out your union with each other in Christ.

Now, most pastors and church leaders won’t deny that it is a good thing to partner together with at least some churches. Some might even say they have a desire for this! But we don’t always know how to get these kinds of partnerships going.

1. Pray for other churches

Before he reminded them of the collection for Jerusalem, Paul assured the Church of Corinth that they participated in and helped his ministry by their prayers (2 Cor 1:11).

The first way to start partnering with other churches is to pray for them. Before you ever meet anyone at the church across town, you can partner with them by praying for them! So if you are serious about partnering with other churches, begin by regularly praying for them, both privately and publicly.

2. Pursue relationships

Even though you can partner with other churches simply by praying for them, it’s difficult to know the best ways to pray without knowing them. And it will be even harder to build significant partnerships without that relationship. You cannot partner with someone whom you don’t trust. But in order to build that trust, you’re going to need to spend time together.

So if you are a pastor and you don’t currently have significant relationships with other pastors in your community, make this your starting point. If there’s a pastors’ fellowship in your area, prioritize attending. If there isn’t, consider starting one. Beyond that, invite other pastors to lunch or coffee. Have dinner with their families. Build friendships beyond a quarterly pastors fellowship.

As pastors and church leaders spend more time together, they will often be able to invite their congregations into those relationships. If you have a special service, you can invite pastors and other key leaders to attend and get to know others in your church. For example, during Holy Week, our church has services on Thursday, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. We often invite pastors from other churches, especially to the Thursday and Saturday services. At our Easter Vigil this year, we had pastors from at least four other churches present! Through these services, we’ve seen not just friendships build between pastors, but even now friendships among other church members are starting to grow.

3. Pay attention to opportunities

As you build trusting and long-term relationships with other pastors and churches, you will likely start to see missional needs in your community. Most fruitful and lasting church partnerships don’t begin with the partnership itself. Rather, they grow out of an already-existing relationship.

Recently, the Hawaiian island of Oahu, where I live, experienced its worst flooding in over two decades. We got hit with back-to-back “Kona low” storms, which is basically a storm that comes from the opposite side of the island. The wind normally blows and can often bring a lot of lingering rain and wind. The North Shore of Oahu was hit especially hard. One of my friends up there told me that most of the houses in his neighborhood flooded, yet most of the people did not have flood insurance because they’re not in a flood zone. Except when they are. After the news cycle moved on and the flood waters receded, we were left with the clean up.

As the clean up began, I had a phone call with a pastor on the North Shore who was looking for help. The next day, he sent out a text to a handful of pastors coordinating clean up. I drove up to see how our church and local pastors network could help, and I ran into friends from five or six other churches who showed up on the North Shore ready to help clean up flood damage. Over the next week, we saw churches across the island partner together to help their brothers and sisters on the North Shore.

After over a decade of friendship and ministry on the same island, many of us already knew each other. We had seen both the importance of connections across churches and the need we have for each other. Because of this, we were prepared to partner together to help meet some of these needs when they arose.

4. Prioritize the gospel

Over the years, I have seen church partnerships come and go. Some of these partnerships ran their course because they met whatever need brought them together. Others have fallen apart in less-than-ideal ways. Partnering together is not always easy or simple. Theological differences surface. Different philosophies of ministry or church polities cause friction. Personalities clash. Sinners sin against other sinners.

Let’s not be naive. There are going to be relational problems. The complications of working together will be just that: complicated.

However, if we enter into these relationships with the commitment to keep the gospel central in our partnerships with other churches and not let our secondary differences drive us apart, they will have a greater chance of long-term success. As problems arise, run back to the gospel and remember the foundation for these relationships.

Even when partnerships come to an end, if we remember that we are united in Christ and hold on to that, the door will remain open for new partnerships in the future.

Share your thoughts

How can nearby churches build partnerships? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Chris Bruno’s suggested resources

• Jensen, Peter. “The Partnership of All Believers.” Churchman 133, no. 2 (2019): 99–106.
• Sweeney, Michael L. “The Pauline Collection, Church Partnerships, and the Mission of the Church in the 21st Century.” Missiology 48 (2020): 142–53.

Churches Partnering Together: Biblical Strategies for Fellowship, Evangelism, and Compassion

Regular price: $9.59

Add to cart

Stronger Together: Seven Partnership Virtues and the Vices that Subvert Them

Regular price: $7.99

Add to cart

Related articles

• One, Holy, Catholic & Apostolic: The 4 Marks Explained
• What Is Friendship—& Can Pastors Find It in the Church?
• 5 Steps to Starting a Prayer Ministry in Your Church
• Want to Build a Pastoral Internship? 4 Steps

Jonathan Akin joins Kirk E. Miller on What in the Word? to discuss one of the Bible’s most infamous passages: Elisha’s curse that led to two she-bears mauling forty-two “youths” in 2 Kings 2:23–24.

Was Elisha simply an irritable old man who couldn’t take a joke? How old were these “youths”? And what exactly does their jeer, “Go up, baldhead!” mean? This episode examines these matters and more, exploring the passage’s meaning and significance even for today.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Jonathan Akin

Dr. Jonathan Akin serves as the vice president for Church Relations and Campus Ministries and is a professor of Old Testament at Carson-Newman University, a Christian institution in East Tennessee. He also serves as an adjunct professor of Old Testament and Preaching at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary. 

Dr. Akin is the author of books like Preaching Christ from Proverbs, Exalting Jesus in Proverbs, Exalting Jesus in Ecclesiastes, Exalting Jesus in Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, and the forthcoming Exalting Jesus in Numbers. He is also a contributor to Louie Giglio’s The Jesus Bible and R. Albert Mohler’s The Grace and Truth Study Bible.

He has served as a pastor of churches in Kentucky, Tennessee, Florida, and North Carolina. He and his wife Ashley have been married for twenty years and have three children: Maddy, Emma Grace, and Judson.

• Facebook
• X
• Instagram

Episode synopsis

Why this passage disturbs many

Elisha is traveling toward Bethel when a group described in many English translations as “young boys” comes out and mocks him, calling him “bald head.” Elisha calls down a curse upon them, and two she-bears maul forty-two of them.

Walter Kaiser summarizes the common reaction:

The way many read this text, a mild personal offense by some innocent little children was turned into a federal case by a crotchety old prophet as short on hair as he was on humor. Put in its sharpest form, the complaint goes: How can I believe in a God who would send bears to devour little children for innocently teasing an old man whose appearance probably was unusual even for that day?⁵⁰

The punishment, according to this surface-level reading, is grotesquely disproportionate to the crime.

Beyond the ethical questions posed by the passage, others may express skepticism toward the supernatural idea of a prophet’s curse conjuring bears.

Passing the baton from Elijah to Elisha

Second Kings 2:23–24 comes at the end of the narrative recounting the transfer of prophetic authority from Elijah to Elisha (2 Kgs 2:1–22). Elijah has been caught up into heaven, leaving a double portion of spirit upon Elisha (2 Kgs 2:9–12, 15), who is to carry on his work. The baton is now in Elisha’s hands. What follows, including the bears episode, must be read in light of this transition.

Dr. Jonathan Akin draws a parallel: a man of God whose mission on earth is finished ascends into heaven and leaves his spirit with his follower to continue that mission. The similarities to Christ’s ascension and pouring out his Spirit on his disciples at Pentecost are hard to miss.

Who are these “young boys”?

Elisha goes up to Bethel and there encounters a large group of youths. Most editions translate their designation as something like “small boys” or even “little children” (KJV). In English, this type of language suggests prepubescent children, the kind of little boys you’d expect to find in an elementary classroom. If so, Elisha’s response and the ensuing judgment seem especially over-the-top.

But the Hebrew words used, נַ֫עַר and יֶ֫לֶד, can have a broader range of meaning than the impression left by these translations. They can refer to small children, yes, but they are also used elsewhere to describe young men and older adolescents. For instance, 1 Kings 12:14 uses יֶ֫לֶד to refer to Rehoboam’s peers who gave him the disastrous advice that split the kingdom. These were not children but adult men.

Jonathan suggests that these youths were most likely teenagers or young adults, not toddlers or little boys. The context, as we are about to see, indicates the likelihood of this reading.

Bethel as center of idolatrous worship

Geographical markers in biblical narrative are not incidental details. The mention of Bethel, therefore, is not unimportant. Bethel is where King Jeroboam set up a golden calf as an alternative worship center when the kingdom split. From its very founding, the Northern Kingdom was built on idolatry, with Bethel its geographical center.

Thus, when Elisha arrives at Bethel, he is walking into a stronghold of the very idolatry that God had sent him and Elijah to confront. The youths who come out to mock him grew up in that environment. Some interpreters even suggest they might be connected to the apostate priesthood in Bethel, essentially students of that idolatrous system. But whether or not they have a formal connection to the cult, they at least represent the fruit of a community that has systematically rejected the God of Israel and, by extension, his prophet.

This ought to inform how we read both their mockery of Elisha, God’s prophet, and their judgment that quickly follows. These youths are the product—representatives—of a community that has sustained systematic idolatry for generations.

The significance of their insult

The words “Go up, you baldhead!” at first glance may seem to indicate that these youths are simply making fun of Elisha’s physical appearance. On the one hand, maybe Elisha was physically bald, and these youths were simply mocking that fact.

Alternatively, though, Akin points out that earlier in the chapter, as Elijah and Elisha travel together, the sons of the prophets repeatedly say to Elisha, “Do you know that today the Lord will take away your master from over you?” (2 Kgs 2:3, 5)—or more literally, “from over your head [רֹאשׁ].” In other words, by taking Elijah, the Lord was taking Elisha’s head, i.e., his leader, authority, and mentor. When God takes Elijah up in the whirlwind, God takes Elisha’s “head,” leaving him, in this sense, “bald.” Thus, when these youths shout “Go up, baldhead,” they may be taunting Elisha with the fact that his mentor has been taken away, leaving him by himself.

Likewise, the verb translated “go up” is the same used moments earlier to describe when Elijah “went up” into heaven (2 Kgs 2:11). Thus, the youths may effectively mean, As Elijah went up and away, now you get out of here, as well. We don’t want you, either!

Accordingly, the insult is not a joke about Elisha’s hairline (in fact, he may not even have been physically bald). Rather, it’s a rejection of Elisha, and inasmuch as Elisha is God’s prophet, it’s a rejection of God. Even if Elisha was physically bald, and that physical baldness was the object of scorn, the taunt should nonetheless be understood within this context of idolatry and the rejection of Elisha as a prophet. The mockery was not a mere poking fun at an old man’s appearance.

The ensuing judgment, bears from the woods, among other things serves to demonstrate that Elijah’s mantle has indeed passed on to Elisha. He’s not without God’s power and backing.

Covenant curses foreshadowed

God had warned Israel centuries earlier that covenant rebellion would bring covenant curses. Among those curses, in Leviticus 26:22 God says, “I will let loose the wild beasts against you, which shall bereave you of your children.” This, as we see, is quite literally what transpires in 2 Kings 2:23–24, as two wild beasts (bears) maul these youths. These bears are an installment of the covenant curses that God had promised would come if Israel rejected him.

They are also a warning. If the lesson is not learned, the curses will escalate. The final curse, as both Leviticus and Deuteronomy make clear, is national exile. Interestingly, the nations that eventually devour and scatter Israel are described in places like Psalm 80:13 and Daniel 7 as beasts. In this way, the inflicted curse in the form of these literal beasts foreshadows the beastly nations that are to come if Israel fails to repent. In 722 BC, God uses Assyria to drag the Northern Kingdom into exile.

Elisha as a new Joshua—and Jesus as a new Elisha

The route Elijah and Elisha take in 2 Kings 2 seems to be an intentional parallel to the exodus and conquest narratives, a replay of those events. Namely, Elijah and Elisha’s journey from Gilgal to Bethel to Jericho to the Jordan River, where God parts the waters and Elijah ascends east of the promised land (2 Kgs 2:1–12). This geographical sequence is the exodus and conquest in reverse.

Following the exodus, Edom denies Israel entrance to pass through (Num 20:14–21), so they are forced to go around and enter from the east of the Jordan (Num 21:4; Deut 2:1–8). Moses dies east of the Jordan and never enters the land (Deut 34:1–8). Before he dies, he commissions Joshua, who receives the spirit (Deut 31:7–8; 34:9). Joshua then leads Israel across the Jordan (Josh 3), after which they go first to Jericho (Josh 6), then toward Ai near Bethel (Josh 7–8). The purpose of this conquest is to rid the land of idolatry and establish the true worship of God (Deut 7:1–5; 12:1–4).

Second Kings 2, thus, presents Elisha as a new Joshua figure, pointing to the need for a new conquest to rid the land of idolatry, because the Northern Kingdom has become what Canaan once was. Elisha’s name even parallels Joshua’s: Joshua means “the Lord saves”; Elisha means “my God is savior.”

And just as 2 Kings 2 points backward to Joshua, it also points forward. John the Baptist, identified in the New Testament as the new Elijah (Mark 9:11–13; cf. Mal 4:5), baptizes east of the Jordan (Mark 1:4–5; John 1:28). Jesus (which means Joshua) crosses over, receives the Spirit (Mark 1:9–12), and begins a ministry of judgment and salvation (Mark 1:14–15). Like Elisha, Jesus will multiply bread (Mark 6:30–44; cf. 2 Kgs 4:42–44), heal lepers (Mark 1:40–45; cf. 2 Kgs 5:1–14), and raise dead children (Mark 5:35–43; cf. 2 Kgs 4:32–37). But he will also cleanse the temple (Mark 11:15–19), cast out unclean spirits (Mark 1:21–28), and confront the corrupt (Mark 12:38–40).

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Share your thoughts

How do you make sense of Elisha’s response and the ensuing judgment? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Jonathan Akin’s suggested 1–2 Kings commentaries

1 & 2 Kings (Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible | BTC)

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

Exalting Jesus in 1 & 2 Kings (Christ-Centered Exposition Commentary | CCE)

Regular price: $11.99

Add to cart

Additional commentaries on 1–2 Kings

Best 1-2 Kings Commentaries (7 vols.)

Regular price: $173.99

Add to cart

1-2 Kings Commentaries: Apply (5 vols.)

Regular price: $65.99

Add to cart

1-2 Kings Commentaries: Exposit (5 vols.)

Regular price: $132.99

Add to cart

1-2 Kings Commentaries: Exegete (5 vols.)

Regular price: $180.99

Add to cart

1, 2 Kings (The New American Commentary | NAC)

Regular price: $25.99

Add to cart

1 & 2 Kings (Understanding the Bible Commentary | UBC)

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

1 & 2 Kings (Apollos Old Testament Commentary | AOT)

Regular price: $28.99

Add to cart

1 and 2 Kings (Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries | TOTC)

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

1 Kings: The Wisdom and the Folly (Focus on the Bible Commentaries | FB)

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

2 Kings: The Power and the Fury (Focus on the Bible Commentaries | FB)

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

Related content

• Did God Command Genocide? | Tremper Longman on the Canaanite Conquest
• Every Exorcism Is Eschatological: The Words of Demons in the Presence of Jesus
• Why Couldn’t Moses Enter the Promised Land? | Michael Morales on Numbers 20
• Does the Bible Condone Slavery? | Rebecca McLaughlin

Getting started is hard. Staying consistent is harder. This update makes both a little easier—for brand-new and longtime users alike.

Also, we’re updating our community this week, so if you’re used to interacting with our team or reporting bugs on our community, you may see that it’s temporarily in read-only mode. Feel free to report issues to our team via our support team or join the conversation on Facebook.

Watch the update

Prefer a video walkthrough? Product manager and longtime Logos user Mark Barnes will share everything you need to know about this update in a live session. There’s even time for a Q&A at the end, so stick around with your burning questions.

Sign up for the video walkthrough on June 4 or catch the replay.

Highlights at a glance

1. Study Assistant in your layouts: Find your AI Bible study companion now alongside your Bible and other tools.
2. Reading plan creation wizard on mobile: Build a personalized reading plan easily from your phone.
3. A reading plan button that keeps you on track: See where you stand the moment you open your Bible or book.

1. Enjoy a new reason to love layouts

Layouts in Logos keep you from needing to open multiple books or tools one by one—for example, your favorite translation, study Bible, commentary, and notes. Layouts are especially capable in the desktop app, followed by the web app.

Logos comes with several prebuilt layouts for you to use. You’ll now find Study Assistant in these several layouts, wherever it makes sense. (For instance, try opening a Personal study from Get Started on your Dashboard.) Now, when you have questions as you read and study, you can easily ask them in Study Assistant from within your current Layout.

If you’ve never given layouts a try (especially if you’re new to Logos), open one today. Choose from our prebuilt list of Quickstart Layouts or even create your own. You don’t need to hunt around in Logos for tools or books. Simply jump in and study.

Those not subscribed will get a limited number of Study Assistant uses per month.

2. Easily build a reading plan from your phone

The much-improved reading plan creation wizard came to desktop and web a few weeks ago. Whether you’ve been wanting to read the Bible more or books about the Bible more (or both), you have custom reading plans—built by you for your life—in the same place you study.

Now you can also create personalized plans on mobile. Build a custom reading plan for your Bible or book wherever you are. Waiting for coffee. Sitting in the carpool line. Five quiet minutes before the day starts. No problem!

The wizard walks you step by step:

• Choose your content: A specific Bible passage range or any book from your Logos library
• Set your pace: “15 minutes a day,” a finish date you’re working toward, or an open-ended plan that’s flexible and waits on you

No more “I meant to read that.” Just start a plan—anytime you want, from your phone. To see how easy it is:

1. Sign in to your Logos account.
2. Give the new experience a try.

3. See subtle reading-plan reminders in your Bible and books

It’s a small thing that actually works.

When you open a book that has a reading plan attached to it, a reminder button now appears in the toolbar at the top of the panel—a quiet cue that your reading is waiting.

A colored dot tells you where you stand:

• Green dot: Plan on track. Today’s reading is ready.
• Red dot: Plan behind. (No guilt—just a nudge.)
• No dot: You’re on an open-ended plan, reading at your own pace.
• No reminder button or dot: You’re caught up—or this book isn’t part of a plan yet.

Click the icon and Logos will take you to your next reading. A ribbon in the margin now marks where your reading starts and ends, so there’s no guessing.

More updates

Want to see all the under-the-hood updates and bug fixes? Take a look at the technical release notes. Reach out to our support team if you need help, or join the conversation on our Facebook page.

We want to hear from you!

Have ideas for how we can build a product you’ll love? Share your suggestion and you might see it in a future update!

Connect with us

Join 500K+ others and connect with us to be first to know about the latest releases and promotions from Logos:

• Logos community forum
• Facebook
• Instagram
• YouTube
• X
• Threads
• LinkedIn
• Bluesky

We’d love to host you for free live training and show you how you can get the most out of Logos.

Subscribe to stay in the know about future updates.

In the end, God will make a new heaven and a new earth, the inheritance of his people.

But to understand Scripture’s end, we must return to its beginning. Leading up to that end lies the whole sweep of Scripture’s story in which God creates and restores a place for his people.

The garden of Eden as God’s original sacred space

In Genesis 1–2, we face the inescapable reality that God made all material things (Gen 1:1), including place. Place matters, because God made it (Gen 2:8). And place is good, because what God made is good (Gen 1:31).

God made the world, forming and filling a material creation (Gen 1:1–2:3). He divided waters (Gen 1:6–7), brought forth land (Gen 1:9–10), and in his climactic work of creation, he made image-bearers (Gen 1:26–27).

After reporting the acts of creation, the biblical author tells us that God rested on the seventh day (Gen 2:1–3). Lacking the “evening” and “morning” language used for the earlier six days, the report about the seventh day suggests that God has continued to rule over the creation he has made. He is the enthroned Maker who sustains all things, and he is guiding all things toward an appointed rest. God created his image-bearers so that they might enter into his rest, living under his joyful reign and his righteous dominion.

This grand purpose is glimpsed in the events of Genesis 2. The man and woman dwelled in the world God had made, and, more specifically, they lived in the garden God had planted: “The Lord God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed” (Gen 2:8).⁵¹ God put the man in the garden “to work it and keep it” (Gen 2:15). This pair of verbs is used later in the Pentateuch to describe the tasks of priests (e.g., Num 3:7–8), so it is plausible to see Adam as a proto-priest, a guardian of a special place, a sacred space. Eden was like a sanctuary, a place where God was present with his people (Gen 3:8).

While God had made all of the material world, not all places were alike. Imagine concentric circles: The garden was within Eden but did not encompass all of it, and Eden itself occupied only a portion of the earth. The man and woman were later exiled from Eden (Gen 3:24), confirming that the garden was a unique and sacred territory within the larger region of Eden, which itself was a special area distinct from the rest of the earth.

The Lord made Eve from Adam (Gen 2:21–23), and the two image-bearers were called to be fruitful and multiply and to fill the land (Gen 1:26–28). The fruitful couple corresponded to the fruitful land. The Lord blessed and nourished his people by providing them a place of abundant plants and trees (Gen 1:29–30; 2:9).

Looking at Genesis 1–2 as a whole, we conclude that God made people to dwell with him in a place. He made a habitable world, one that was—and is—remarkably fine-tuned for life to exist and thrive. God’s purpose of creating a place was to populate it with people.

The fall and the curse on the land

But after the events in Genesis 3, thriving in God’s world is no longer easy.

The problem of sin and death now permeates God’s creation and his image-bearers. Adam and Eve sinned in the sacred space. The man blamed the woman (Gen 3:12), and the woman blamed the serpent (Gen 3:13).

The Lord pronounced consequences that the man and woman—and their posterity—would experience (Gen 3:16–19). The ground would now resist being cultivated. The Lord told the man, “Cursed is the ground because of you; in pain you shall eat of it all the days of your life” (Gen 3:17). Work itself is not a consequence of sin, but the toilsome nature of work certainly is. The image of resistance is evident in Genesis 3:18: “thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you; and you shall eat the plants of the field.” The thorns and thistles represent the curse upon the ground. They signal the opposite of flourishing and fruitfulness.

God told Adam, “By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Gen 3:19). God’s image-bearers were to exercise dominion over creation (Gen 1:28). But now their dominion wouldn’t last forever. In the end, the ground would prevail over them. The dust would receive their bodies. The dust was both their origin (Gen 2:7) and destiny (Gen 3:19).

No matter how much Adam worked, he would not live forever (Gen 5:5). And no matter how much we toil, we will not circumvent death either. There will always be more thorns and thistles. There will always be more work that needs to be done. The fall disrupts creation’s intended rest. Creation “was subjected to futility” by God (Rom 8:20). As we age and as we work, we face the unbending truth of toilsome labor, and we continue headlong down the path toward the grave. We know, deep down, that the dust awaits.

Living outside of Eden was exile for Adam and Eve (Gen 3:24), and it’s exile for all of us, too. We have only known life outside of paradise. We have only known ground that is cursed. We have only known work that is threatened by the futilities and toilsomeness of life under the sun. As people who were made to dwell in a place with God, we cannot return to Eden but will certainly return to the dust.

But God spoke a hopeful word in the garden of Eden: One day, a son will be born who will accomplish a great victory, and this victory will impact the place God had made.

Genesis 3:15 and the curse’s promised reversal

God told the serpent, “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel” (Gen 3:15). According to that promise, a future victor would descend from Eve. The biblical author doesn’t specify when, yet the foundation of messianic hope is laid here. But what would this victor accomplish? In Genesis 3:15, the prophecy emphasizes the serpent’s defeat, which will be a defeat accomplished through the promised son’s suffering.

Generations after Adam, a man (Lamech) would call his son Noah, a name which means “rest.” The biblical author tells us the father’s reasoning: “Out of the ground that the Lord has cursed, this one shall bring us relief from our work and from the painful toil of our hands” (Gen 5:29). Notice the connections between Genesis 5:29 and Genesis 3:15. Not only does Genesis 3:15 envision a future son who is victorious over the serpent, Lamech understands the future figure’s victory will impact the cursed ground, the place of painful toil.

The land is cursed, but the early chapters of Genesis promise a reversal of the curse. Since part of the curse involves the open mouth of the dust receiving the bodies of image-bearers, the reversal of the curse will impact the problem of death, as well. Though neither Genesis 3 nor Genesis 5 specify a resurrection from the dead, the reversal of the curse sets the trajectory for resurrection hope.

As Paul puts it, “Creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the sons of God” (Rom 8:19). At the appointed time,

Creation itself will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation has been groaning together in the pains of childbirth until now. (Rom 8:21–22)

Creation groans for the reversal of the curse. Land and place are impacted by the corruption of a fallen world.

But this is a temporary problem. God’s creation has a bright future of liberation and glory, and the seeds of this hope were sown in the opening chapters of Genesis. Blessing will overcome the curse, through the promised son.

Search your library for answers with Logos’s Study Assistant.
Try it today!

The Abrahamic covenant and the promised land

The echoes of Eden reverberate in God’s calling of Abraham. The Lord tells the Mesopotamian man,

Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonors you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed. (Gen 12:1–3)

Here again we have the threat of curse and the promise of blessing, and the aim of God’s blessing is “all the families of the earth” (Gen 12:3).

Abraham had been given precious promises about a land that would belong to him and to his offspring (Gen 12:7) This “land that I will show you” (Gen 12:1) is the land of Canaan. Abraham traveled to the place and surveyed it as he journeyed through it (Gen 12:4–9). The Jordan River was its eastern border, and the Mediterranean Sea was its western border.

Though no longer in Eden, God’s people will now have a land that has been set apart for them. The promised land was an echo of Eden because God would place his people there to dwell with him through the tabernacle and eventually the temple. This gift of sacred space signaled that God had not trashed his plan to dwell with his covenant people in a special place. This land would be flowing with milk and honey (Exod 3:8)—a blessed land, a space brimming with vitality and fruitfulness.

Abraham’s descendants would not receive this land immediately, however. They would dwell in Egypt for generations, after which the Lord would eventually bring them to the promised land (Gen 15:13–16). For a period, they would be a people waiting for the promise to be kept. The covenant promises, first given to Abraham and then passed to his descendants, included this land promise, so the covenant people could count on Yahweh to fulfill what he had said.

According to the author of Hebrews, the patriarchs did not receive the promised land; they died looking for it by faith. In fact, the patriarchs knew that the promised land, while a part of God’s covenant promise, was not their final and ultimate inheritance. Speaking of Abraham,

By faith he went to live in the land of promise, as in a foreign land, living in tents with Isaac and Jacob, heirs with him of the same promise. For he was looking forward to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God. (Heb 11:9–10)

Of the patriarchal family, the writer says,

These all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but having seen them and greeted them from afar, and having acknowledged that they were strangers and exiles on the earth. For people who speak thus make it clear that they are seeking a homeland. If they had been thinking of that land from which they had gone out, they would have had opportunity to return. But as it is, they desire a better country, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore God is not ashamed to be called their God, for he has prepared for them a city. (Heb 11:13–16)

The patriarchs saw—by faith—that the promised land was not the fullness of their inheritance. A greater land awaited them. A heavenly reality would be theirs, and they desired it, for it was “a better country,” a “city” God had prepared for them. Until that day of heavenly inheritance, the patriarchs would wait in faith.

The Exodus and its aim toward the promised land

When the book of Exodus opens, the people of Israel are captives in a foreign land. They are not a people at rest in God’s promised place. Instead, ruthless taskmasters subjugate them (Exod 1:8–14). The event of the exodus serves God’s larger goal of bringing his people to the appointed place he swore to their forefathers (Exod 3:7–8; 6:6–8).

Leaving unrest in Egypt for rest in the promised land, the people fled with dead lambs in their wake (Exod 12:12–13; 21–23). Deliverance and rest will be achieved through substitutionary sacrifice. Rest is tied to redemption, and redemption happens through blood.

After the exodus from Egypt, God led the Israelites to Sinai (Exod 19:1–2). To prepare his people for life in the promised land, God gave them the law and made with them a covenant (Exod 19–24). The Sinai covenant includes the Ten Commandments, which directed their lives to rest on the seventh (Sabbath) day (Exod 20:8–11). They will rest, remembering that the Creator made all things and that he is leading his people toward the ultimate rest which sin and death cannot spoil. In other words, covenant rest is a shadow of things to come.

In due time, Abraham’s descendants reached the promised land. The imminent problem, however, was that the promised land was occupied by the Canaanites.

The Canaanite conquest and possession of the land

The time of the land’s inheritance coincided with Yahweh’s exercise of dominion over his enemies. By Yahweh’s strength, and in light of his promises, the Israelites would overcome the Canaanites. Inheritance and rest would come by way of conquest (Josh 1:6, 13–14).

God’s law had instructed the Israelites to engage in the conquest of the promised land (Deut 7:1–2). They were to subdue Yahweh’s enemies, disrupting and destroying the idol worship in the land (Deut 20:16–18). False worship had defiled Canaan (Lev 18:24–25). The unclean practices of the Canaanites meant that the land was an unclean place (Lev 18:27–28). The conquest was purgation, purification.

Through Moses, the Lord said,

When you pass over the Jordan into the land of Canaan, then you shall drive out all the inhabitants of the land from before you and destroy all their figured stones and destroy all their metal images and demolish all their high places. And you shall take possession of the land and settle in it, for I have given the land to you to possess it. (Num 33:51–53)

Destroying and driving out—these actions comprise the gist of the conquest commands. They represent what should have happened in Eden under Adam’s leadership. The creeping serpent should have been subdued and driven out of the sacred space (Gen 2:15). Instead, however, the woman heeded the serpent’s lies, and Adam followed suit (Gen 3:1–7). Centuries later, the Israelites were to go into the land of Canaan and drive out the seed of the serpent (Gen 3:15). The falsehood and abominable practices in the land of Canaan must not abide. The conquest was holy warfare that set apart the land for God’s glory and name.

Moses would not lead this warfare, however. He died on the border of the new sacred space (Deut 34). His successor, Joshua, readied and rallied the Israelites for battle (Josh 1). Despite being constantly outnumbered and outgunned, the Israelites experienced the delivering hand of Yahweh, the Divine Warrior. Through battles in the southern and northern parts of the land, the Israelites prevailed over their enemies (Josh 11–12). “And the land had rest from war” (Josh 11:23; emphasis added).

The Israelites were like a corporate Adam, subduing the threats in their sacred space. They were exercising dominion, unlike what the first Adam did to the serpent in the garden. The conquest was the corporate exercise of dominion over the God-dishonoring practices and inhabitants of the promised land.

Idolatry, exile, and Israel’s loss of the land

Although the Israelites inherited the land, they could not keep it. After the book of Joshua, the Bible traces their path that leads them into exile.

When Joshua died, the land was filled with cycles of idolatry, adversaries, judges, and deliverances (Judg 2:11–3:6). Though the Israelites had subdued the land overall, problems abounded within certain regions. Residual idolaters and idol-places became thorns and snares for the covenant people. And soon, the Israelites themselves defiled the very land they were supposed to purge and guard.

Not even the monarchy could save Israel. Solomon’s son Rehoboam provoked a rebellion, and the land divided into a Northern Kingdom and a Southern Kingdom (1 Kgs 12). Though some of the Southern Kingdom’s rulers were righteous, most were not. And all of the Northern Kingdom’s rulers were wicked. Corruption in the monarchy and priesthood continued to plunge the nation into ruin and mayhem.

Rather than a land flowing with milk and honey, the land was flowing with false worship and transgression. The Israelites shamelessly violated their covenant. They imitated the idolatry of the nations around them, becoming stiff-necked like the immovable idols they praised. The covenant community ignored Yahweh’s law and rejected the true prophets whom God raised up to warn and exhort them.

Just as the Lord exiled the first Adam in Genesis 3, the Lord exiled the corporate Adam in 2 Kings 25. The Southern Kingdom fell to Babylon, and the foreign army invaded and destroyed the sanctuary. If the promised land was meant to be an echo of Eden, then the exile of Israel into Babylonian captivity was like a replay of the fall. Adam went east of Eden (Gen 3:24), and the Israelites went east to Babylon.

This loss of land was not only distressing for the nation to experience, it was also confusing with regard to their covenant promises. In Genesis 12, God had promised the land of Canaan to Abraham’s offspring. The exile meant that Abraham’s offspring were displaced into a foreign land and under captivity. This was a reversal of the Exodus and its redemption (Hos 9:3), a new captivity in a new “Egypt” (Deut 28:68; Hos 9:3). From the outside, the scene looked like God’s revocation of his promise to the Abrahamic line. Did the exile from the promised land depict the failure of God’s covenant words?

The return from exile and its incomplete restoration

By no means! When we study Leviticus 26 and Deuteronomy 28, we find that exile to a foreign adversary was actually the outworking of covenant curses—curses which God himself promised and warned would happen to a covenant-rejecting and idol-loving people.

The exile from the promised land was only temporary, however. After approximately seventy years, the people returned (Jer 25, 29). Through the Prophet Ezekiel, God promised that he would raise Israel from the corporate grave of exile. Their restoration to the promised land would be like a resurrection from the dead. God told the prophet,

Behold, I will open your graves and raise you from your graves, O my people. And I will bring you into the land of Israel. And you shall know that I am the Lord, when I open your graves, and raise you from your graves, O my people. And I will put my Spirit within you, and you shall live, and I will place you in your own land. Then you shall know that I am the Lord; I have spoken, and I will do it, declares the Lord. (Ezek 37:12–14)

Under the leadership of Cyrus the Persian (2 Chron 36:22–23; Ezra 1:1–4), the Israelites were permitted to return to the promised land (Ezra 2:1–2), and there they began to rebuild the temple (Ezra 3:8–13). Stalling for years (Hag 1:2–4), the covenant people eventually completed this second temple (see Ezra 1–6; Hag 1).

Despite the restoration of the right people to the right land, the covenant community did not maintain right worship. We know from the ministries of Ezra, Nehemiah, and Malachi that the postexilic state of the land was still characterized by disobedience. There was idolatry, waywardness, intermarriage with idolaters, laxity on sacrificial protocols, and many other sins.

The covenant community polluted the promised land with their many sins. They were the most important people living in the most important land, yet they seemed numb and complacent to their important vocation (Exod 19:5–6). Malachi warned that the Lord might “strike the land with a decree of utter destruction” (Mal 4:6). Given the history of the people, which included a devastating defeat and exile under a foreign adversary, Malachi’s words about future judgment—“utter destruction”—were terrifying and sobering.

Israel’s problems with the land were symptoms of a deeper and spiritual problem within the covenant people.

Jesus and the fulfillment of the land promise

The Lord Jesus’s ministry was the fulfillment of these earlier hopes and promises (2 Cor 1:20). Jesus is like a new Adam, except this Adam would succeed and be faithful (Rom 5:14; 1 Cor 15:45; Matt 4:1–11). Jesus was like a new Israel, except this Israel would be steadfast and obedient.

Nothing Jesus did would bring defilement or pollution. Rather, he came with the power to restore, cleanse, and transform. As the greater Joshua, Jesus ministered in the southern and northern parts of the land, engaging in a greater conquest. He exercised dominion and subdued: He combatted spiritual powers; he healed diseases; he performed miracles in nature; he pronounced forgiveness and delivered demoniacs; he taught with unprecedented authority; and he even overthrew death on multiple occasions. No matter what good things the promised land had experienced over the centuries, never had there been someone like Jesus upon its soil. He was a shining light on the land of Israel, and light shone wherever he went (Matt 4:13–16).

Some of the most well-known teachings of Jesus are the Beatitudes. And one of these Beatitudes evokes the notion of land. Jesus said, “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth” (Matt 5:5). As we’ve seen, inheritance is an Old Testament concept associated with the land, and here Jesus applies it to more than just the promised land. He didn’t say, “The meek shall inherit the promised land.” Rather, he identifies what the promised land was meant to typify and foreshadow. The promised land pointed to a new creation, a renewed and transformed world. The meek will inherit the earth, because that’s what the previous sacred spaces—like Eden and the promised land—had anticipated all along.

As in the first exodus, so in this greater exodus, deliverance unto rest is achieved by substitutionary sacrifice. Jesus dies on a cross for our sins and is raised from death, inaugurating the new creation. In this way, Jesus is the promised seed of Abraham through whom God brings blessing to the nations (Gal 3:16; cf. Gen 12:2–3). He takes Adam and Israel’s curse (Gal 3:13) so that we might receive God’s promised, covenant blessings (Gal 3:14). The New Testament describes this salvation in language that echoes the promised land: inheritance (Gal 3:18, 29; 4:7; cf. Acts 20:32; Eph 1:14, 18; Heb 11:8; 1 Pet 1:4). Jesus, thus, invites all people to come to him to find that long-awaited rest (Matt 11:28–30), and he guides us into that Rest which is to come (Heb 3:7–4:13).

New creation and the promised land’s consummation

The final destination of land promises and land shadows is the new creation. The meek will inherit the earth (Matt 5:5), and Abraham was “heir of the world” (Rom 4:13). Such a vast inheritance far exceeds what the covenant community enjoyed in the Old Testament.

The return of Christ will bring about the liberation of creation. This thorn-ridden world “will be set free from its bondage to corruption and obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God” (Rom 8:21). The children of God will have the glory of their own resurrection, and this “revealing of the sons of God” (Rom 8:19) is the signal for creation’s own renewal and transformation.

In Revelation 21, John tells us what he saw:

Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and the sea was no more. And I saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, “Behold, the dwelling place of God is with man. He will dwell with them, and they will be his people, and God himself will be with them as their God.” (Rev 21:1–3)

From Genesis to Revelation, the Bible is a story of God’s dwelling with his people. From Eden to the New Jerusalem, God is seeking to establish a place of glory and peace and rest for his image-bearers. Through Christ, blessing triumphs over the cosmic curse. Christ is the greater Noah who will actually bring rest from the toil of our hands and will reverse the curse upon the ground. God will, at last, dwell with his people in a renewed and glorified state.

All things will become new (Rev 21:5; cf. Isa 65:17). Though the garden was only part of Eden, and though the promised land was only part of the territory in the ancient Near East, the new heaven and new earth have no such boundaries.

Conclusion

The topic of land is a lens through which you can see the whole storyline of Scripture. As the last Adam and true Israel, the Lord Jesus has come to lead us into perfect rest, a state of such blessing and grace that the end of all things is better than its initial sinless garden setting. As our new Moses and greater Joshua, Jesus leads us into a new creation flowing with milk and honey, as well as mercy and holiness. Because Christ is ours, the eternal and incorruptible new creation is ours.

This new creation is the “better country” that the patriarchs desired (Heb 11:16). It is our true and lasting home. Our final salvation is called our inheritance for good reason. For now, we see this fairer land from afar, by faith.

This new creation will abide under the joyful rule of the messianic king. His glory will cover the earth as the waters cover the sea (Num 14:21; Ps 72:19; Isa 11:9; Hab 2:14).

Resources for further study

Bound for the Promised Land: The Land Promise in God’s Redemptive Plan (New Studies in Biblical Theology)

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

From Land to Lands, from Eden to the Renewed Earth: A Christ-Centered Biblical Theology of the Promised Land

Regular price: $39.99

Add to cart

The Land: Place as Gift, Promise, and Challenge in Biblical Faith

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

God’s People in God’s Land: Family, Land, and Property in the Old Testament

Regular price: $32.99

Add to cart

Related content

• What’s Typology? Patterns of Creation in Redemptive History
• What Is the New Heaven and the New Earth? 8 Metaphors to Know
• What Does It Mean That All of Creation Groans?
• Heaven Invades Earth: Understanding the Symbolism & Purpose of the Tabernacle
• How the Great Commission Echoes the Old Testament

If the Bible teaches that human beings are made in the image of God, why does the Bible seem to allow their enslavement? It’s a question that often troubles believers and serves as an objection for skeptics. Kirk E. Miller sits down with author and apologist Rebecca McLaughlin to work through the issue historically, biblically, and theologically. As we’ll see, those passages that often seem like roadblocks to faith, when read carefully and in context, turn out to be signposts pointing toward it.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Rebecca McLaughlin

Rebecca McLaughlin holds a PhD in Renaissance literature from Cambridge University and a theology degree from Oak Hill College in London. She lives in Cambridge, MA, with her husband, Bryan, their three children, and their wider church family. Rebecca is the author of several books, including:

• Confronting Christianity: 12 Hard Questions for the World’s Largest Religion (2019), which was named book of the year by Christianity Today
• 10 Questions Every Teen Should Ask (and Answer) About Christianity (2021)
• The Secular Creed: Engaging Five Contemporary Claims (2021)
• Is Christmas Unbelievable? Four Questions Everyone Should Ask About the World’s Most Famous Story (2021)
• Jesus Through the Eyes of Women: How the First Female Disciples Help Us Know and Love the Lord (2022)
• No Greater Love: A Biblical Vision for Friendship (2023)
• Does the Bible Affirm Same-Sex Relationships? (2024)

• Instagram
• YouTube
• Instagram
• Link

Episode synopsis

Delineating the difficulty

Contemporary Westerners approach the topic of slavery with imaginations shaped by the horrors of the transatlantic slave trade and the evils of slavery in the Antebellum South. Moreover, many Christians actively used the Bible to justify this enslavement of African peoples. For instance, many appealed to a so-called “curse of Ham” to justify the enslavement of African people. Such misuse of Scripture understandably weighs heavily on us as we approach the matter of slavery in the Scriptures. (As McLaughlin points out, though, that weight can sometimes cloud rather than clarify what the Bible is actually saying.)

Historian Mark Noll has described the Civil War as, among other things, a theological crisis: Christians on both sides of the debate over slavery appealed to the Bible.⁵² Underneath the political conflict, one discovered a conflict of hermeneutics. This prompts questions: Why do we now side with the abolitionists? Is it simply that the Bible is ambiguous enough to support either interpretation, or is there a more principled case for the abolitionist reading?

The nature of slavery in the Bible

A crucial step toward rightly understanding the Bible’s teaching on slavery is to disentangle it from assumptions we bring based on slavery’s modern expressions. Ancient slavery, whether under Old Testament law or within the Greco-Roman world of the New Testament, was not the chattel-based institution of the Antebellum South. It was not based on racial identity, and many had a realistic routes to freedom. There were many paths into slavery, including conquest, poverty, being born to slave parents, and debt—the latter being the most common by far. In fact, you might sell yourself into a form of service that functioned much like employment. Moreover, slavery was far more variegated than the single image that tends to dominate our imagination. Some slaves held significant social status, managed households, and exercised authority over others.

What does the Bible say about slavery?
Use Logos’s Factbook to start your study.

God gives Israel laws to guarantee the proper treatment of slaves and to protect them from abuse (Exod 21). These regulations should not read as permissions for everything the law doesn’t explicitly prohibit. These laws set limits on the worst behaviors, but they don’t define the ceiling of acceptable conduct.

God repeatedly ties these commands to Israel’s own experience of slavery: “Remember that you were slaves in Egypt” (e.g., Deut 5:15; 15:15; 16:12; 24:18, 22). Israel’s national identity and relationship with God began with emancipation: God had redeemed them out of slavery in Egypt. That collective memory was to shape how Israelites treated those in vulnerable positions, including slaves. The Sabbath and Jubilee years extended this logic further: People who had been sold into servitude were to be released and restored, their debts forgiven (Lev 25). The structure of Israel’s social economy included mechanisms designed to prevent permanent, hereditary poverty and bondage, reflecting the emancipatory aims of the Exodus itself.

God’s concern for the enslaved

Yet even before the giving of the law, the Bible’s narrative portrays God as one who sees and dignifies enslaved people.

For example, when Sarah expels Hagar, her Egyptian servant, leaving her destitute in the wilderness, God meets her and makes promises to her that parallel those he made to Abraham (Gen 16). Hagar becomes the first person in the entire Bible to give God a name: El Roi, “the God who sees” (Gen 16:13). This is who God is, a God who sees and concerns himself with the plight of mistreated slaves.

Some generations later, the Israelites themselves become slaves under the Egyptians (the roles reversed). So again, God attends to the cries of those enslaved and oppressed:

Their cry for rescue from slavery came up to God. And God heard their groaning, and God remembered his covenant with Abraham, with Isaac, and with Jacob. God saw the people of Israel—and God knew. (Exod 2:23–25)

God identifies himself throughout the Old Testament as the one who brought Israel out of Egypt, out of the house of slavery. As the Black church tradition has often emphasized, the Exodus became the paradigm for understanding God’s redemption.

Jesus’s inversion of greatness

Immediately after Jesus foretells of his death, his disciples begin arguing about which of them will be the greatest (Mark 10:32–41). Yet Jesus teaches that, in contrast to the world’s norms in which superiors lord their power over others (Mark 10:42), “whoever would be great among you must be your servant, and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all” (Mark 10:43–44; emphasis added). They must follow in his footsteps, who “came not to be served but to serve” (Mark 10:45).

Likewise, the night before his arrest, Jesus strips down to a slave’s clothing and washes his disciples’ feet (John 13). They are horrified. This is the Lord, performing a task assigned to slaves. He then tells us to do likewise by serving one another (John 13:13–15).

Philippians 2 captures this arc: The one who is in very nature God took the form of a slave, even humbled himself to a slave’s death: crucifixion. We likely struggle to grasp how scandalous this truly is. To a Greco-Roman audience, the cross was not a religious symbol worn around the neck or a decoration for our sanctuaries. It was a shameful execution assigned to disgraced slaves. This is the extent of God’s humiliation for us.

And this is what Jesus demands of all his people: that we follow in his footsteps by taking up our cross (Mark 8:34–35; 9:30–31) and making ourselves slaves of others (Mark 9:33–37). Christ’s kingdom inverts our constructed hierarchies. Slavery, instead of belonging to the lowest, becomes an obligation of all. In fact, those with the most authority in the Christian community are the ones most obligated to conduct themselves as servants. Servitude, rather than a diminishment, is the defining posture of greatness. In this way, Christianity doesn’t abolish slavery by saying no one is a slave but by declaring everyone is a slave.

Christianity’s subversion of slavery

Paul’s letter to Philemon is, as Rebecca puts it, the most brilliantly passive-aggressive piece of ancient literature. Paul is sending Onesimus, a slave who apparently ran away, back to his master Philemon. On the surface, it may seem Paul endorses and supports his slavery—until you read the letter. Paul does not just ask for clemency. Paul tells Philemon to receive Onesimus back as he would receive Paul himself, as an honored guest—this in a society where a runaway slave could face severe punishment.

From a Christian standpoint, we are all slaves to Christ and to one another, including masters (e.g., Philemon) to their slaves (e.g., Onesimus). Moreover, the category of “my slave” is replaced with “my brother.” We are brothers and sisters. As Paul says elsewhere, in the church “there is neither … slave nor free … for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:28; emphasis added). Interestingly in Colossians, whereas Paul refers to all his other colleagues as “fellow slaves,” he conspicuously refrains from that language when describing Onesimus, the one man who actually was, legally, a slave. Rather, Paul calls him simply “our faithful and beloved brother” (Col 4:9). The exception seems intentional.

We can sometimes approach the Bible as if we possess independent moral criteria by which to judge its treatment of slavery. Yet values such as human equality, inherent dignity, and universal rights did not emerge out of thin air. We may take them for granted nowadays, but they are not self-evident and cannot simply be assumed. Human rights cannot derive from atheistic materialism; secular humanism employs them as borrowed capital. Thus, we end up critiquing the Bible with moral resources we’ve (perhaps unknowingly) derived from the Bible, cutting off the branch on which we sit.

The Bible teaches that every human being exists as the image of God. That conviction, worked out across the Christian tradition, is what eventually dismantled the institution of slavery. What at first may seem like roadblocks to Christianity turn out to be signposts pointing to it.

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

What insights would you add regarding how the Bible treats slavery? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Related resources from Rebecca McLaughlin

• Rebecca McLaughlin, “Should Christians Reject Slavery and Affirm Same-Sex Marriage?”

Confronting Christianity: 12 Hard Questions for the World’s Largest Religion

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

The Secular Creed: Engaging Five Contemporary Claims

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

Additional resources on slavery and the Bible

Is Christianity the White Man’s Religion? How the Bible Is Good News for People of Color

Regular price: $13.19

Add to cart

Is God a Moral Monster?: Making Sense of the Old Testament God

Regular price: $16.99

Add to cart

Is God a Vindictive Bully? Reconciling Portrayals of God in the Old and New Testaments

Regular price: $27.99

Add to cart

Ancient Slavery and Its New Testament Contexts

Regular price: $25.99

Add to cart

Old Testament Ethics for the People of God

Regular price: $31.99

Add to cart

Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed.

Regular price: $36.99

Add to cart

Related content

• What Is Christian Ethics? How Scripture Shapes Our Moral Lives
• What Does It Mean to Be Human? Theological Anthropology
• What Is the Curse of Ham? | Chad Bird on Genesis 9:18–29
• Black Political Theology: An Anti-oppression Faith
• Servant-Leadership: How Jesus Redefines Greatness

Disciples are followers of God’s Word. So why do we so often wonder what to do with the Bible? Making sense of the words is one thing. Applying them to my life is another. What must I do to behave “biblically”? Does it require a rigid step-by-step method?

There are entire books that try to clarify what application is, but it is not as complicated as we might think.

What does it mean to apply the Bible?

The word application was first used as a hermeneutical concept by Pietists. It was seen as the next step after understanding and interpretation. For the Pietists, hermeneutics involved not only our thoughts but also our affections. The right affections resulted in holy living.⁵³ Thus, the preacher’s task, for instance, was not merely to convey the meaning of the Scriptures, but to plant it into the souls of listeners.

Nowadays, application is not less emphasized. Yet it has become less significant and less affective. For scholars, application may be an optional step after exegesis. For pastors, it may be the last-minute point at the end of an expositional sermon. At the same time, lay Christians may either apply without constraints or become discouraged by overly complex methods. Yet, in fact, application is essential and accessible in our ordinary life.

The question of how to apply it rightly is unavoidable. Application happens in our daily reading and devotion, in our weekly preaching and Bible study, and everywhere in our ordinary life. We are applying the Bible when we choose to apologize to our spouse after a fight, or when we pray for the annoying driver who repeatedly blocks our way. Daily life is filled with applications.

There will be many struggles, confusions, and failures when we try to live “biblically.” But when we repeatedly open ourselves to be challenged and transformed by its stories, teachings, and testimonies, we will gradually discover a pattern of decision making—biblically grounded discernment and judgment—forming in our hearts. Application makes biblical teachings our way of life, our way of being before God and neighbors.

If we understand what “apply” means in ordinary language, we may already know how to do it more than we realize. To apply the Bible means to:

1. Use it faithfully,
2. relate it to our situation fittingly, and
3. devote ourselves to it fervently, with our head, heart, and hands.

These three senses are inseparable aspects of the whole process of application. Each aspect involves the other two.

Why should we apply the Bible?

God is speaking to us through the Bible. God’s Word is not only informative but also normative and formative, and thus demands our response (Matt 7:24, 26; Jas 1:22–25). Application, therefore, is not an optional postscript. It is demanded by the meaning of the biblical text.

Interpretation without application is like the following child:

Mom: “Listen, it’s time to practice the piano.”

Child: “I hear you, Mom.”

(Ten minutes later, the child is still watching cartoons.)

Mom: “Did you hear what I said? Do you understand what I mean?”

Child: “Of course I understood. You told me to play the piano.”

Mom: “Then why are you still sitting there?”

We intuitively know from this example that to truly grasp the meaning of the mother’s words is to apply them. So too the meaning of the biblical text—the divine author’s communicative intent—is not simply to provide us with information about the past. A failure to apply the Bible is actually a failure to reckon with its meaning. The Bible is not a mere database of raw material from which to develop abstract doctrines. It is God’s authoritative address, and it demands our obedient response.

Integrate application into your Bible study with Logos’s Workflows.
Start a free trial!

How do we apply the Bible?

Popular textbooks on hermeneutics devote entire chapters to application, but in doing so they often employ differing concepts.

• Grant Osborne speaks of contextualization, the way to make an ancient text relevant today.⁵⁴⁵⁵
• Kevin Vanhoozer employs the idea of theatrical or musical performance, an external enactment of biblical truth in daily living.⁵⁶
• Jeannine Brown differentiates between movement and participation models of application among scholars.⁵⁷

We may feel overwhelmed by so many different names for and models of application. Yet we can eliminate much confusion by clarifying the underlying concept.

Aspects of application

The ordinary use of the word apply has multiple possible meanings. We can apply ointment or paint, for example. We can apply a technique we’ve learned to a task. We can apply for a job or apply the law to a particular case. But when apply is used in hermeneutics, it generally means:

1. Use = make functional (i.e., I apply the Word of God to my life)
2. Relate = make relevant (i.e., I apply the Word of God to my current situation)
3. Devote = attend to with diligence (i.e., I apply myself to the Word of God)

Thus, when scholars disagree over the concept of application, sometimes it is because they may be using application in one of these different ways. For example, Scholar A says, “Application must happen after interpretation.” Scholar B says, “No! Application is already happening in interpretation.” Scholar A is right if application means use, because we can only apply (i.e., use) something (i.e., meaning) if we first have it. Scholar B is right if application means relate, because we have to apply (i.e., relate) the text to our own context to know the correct meaning of the text. I have to apply (i.e., relate) Paul’s command for women to cover their heads (1 Cor 11:6) to our modern context to determine whether the command is culturally specific or universally binding.

Though scholars categorize application in different ways, these categories often follow a shared pattern resembling the three aspects above:

1. use,
2. relevance, and
3. devotion.

John Frame, for instance, defines theology as the application of the Word of God to all areas of life by persons. Such theology is tri-perspectival:

1. It is the application of Scripture (normative perspective)
2. to situations (situational perspective)
3. by persons (existential perspective).⁵⁸

Daniel Doriani’s book Putting Truth to Work (2001), which might be the only comprehensive book specifically on application, matches Frame’s categories as he identifies different aspects of application:

1. Duty (or norms) that governs the choices we should make
2. Discernment and goal that help us decide when and where to apply which norms
3. Character or the transformation of the person⁵⁹

So too we can describe these three aspects of application in terms of Vanhoozer’s performance model of textual understanding:

1. The canon is the authoritative holy script that establishes the norms for Christian life and thought.
2. The cultural context is the stage on which the holy script is performed in situationally fitting ways.
3. The actors are the interpreters who fervently devote themselves to the task of faithfully performing the normative text in new situations.

In applying the Bible, then, we can focus on each of these aspects as three strands that make up a unified cord of understanding:

1. Use: If our focus is textual meaning, then our application will be normative use (i.e., we use the text as an authority for Christian living).
2. Relevance: If our focus is on the present situation, then our application will be situational relevance (think: case law). We make a contextually appropriate specification of the text’s communicative intention.
3. Devotion: If our focus is on our own subjectivity, then our application will be existential devotion. We expose ourselves to the light of the text.

Criteria for application

Following these three aspects of application, allow me to suggest three criteria for right application:

1. Faithful use: We apply (use) the text as a norm in a way that is faithful to the canonical text and to the history of its orthodox reception in Christian tradition.
2. Fitting relevance: We apply (relate) it to our present situations and make judgments that are fitting to new cultural contexts.
3. Fervent devotion: We apply (devote) ourselves fervently to participate in the text’s world—God’s kingdom—and let it transform our whole person.

To what do we apply the Bible?

Application ideally unfolds in three stages and involves three domains of the person.

1. First, we contextualize the meaning of the text and discern its relevance within our present context. This is application in the cognitive domain (“head”), where we do theoretical theology or practical theology by relating the meaning to ourselves and new contexts.
2. Second, we internalize this relevance so that it transforms our affections, dispositions, and will. This is application in the affective domain (“heart”), where we personalize the general relevance and allow it to change us.
3. Finally, we enact what has been internalized through concrete patterns of life and practice (performance). This is application in the behavioral domain (“hands”), where we actualize the relevance of the text in practice. This is the outward realization of what has been formed in our heart.

Application is ultimately about the renewal of the whole person, including the cognitive, affective, and behavioral domains. Too often our idea of application stops at the cognitive domain. Yet application involves not just the head, but also the heart and hands. Likewise, merely to perform the text without inner transformation is shallow. That is why scholars consider other terms besides “application” to better capture its scope.

Conclusion

The fruit of application takes time and hard work. Application is so rich that one verse is enough for us to repeatedly meditate and apply for a whole year. Yet application is also simple enough that everyone can understand and do it every day of their lives.

Yes, we must be faithful and treat God’s words with fear. But in another sense, we do not need to fear. Application is simply about trust and obedience: We find out what God is doing with these words and then apply them by responding obediently.

When God is declaring, we believe.

When God is promising, we hope.

When God is commanding, we obey.

When God is warning, we repent.

When God is calling, we follow.

Share your thoughts

What hermeneutical principles should guide application? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Resources for further study

Four Views on Moving Beyond the Bible to Theology (Counterpoints)

Regular price: $22.99

Add to cart

Putting the Truth to Work: The Theory and Practice of Biblical Application

Regular price: $12.99

Add to cart

Beyond the Bible: Moving from Scripture to Theology (Acadia Studies in Bible and Theology)

Regular price: $23.99

Add to cart

NIV Application Commentary | NIVAC: Old and New Testaments, 44 vols.

Regular price: $1,199.99

Add to cart

The NIV Application Commentary on the Bible: One-Volume Edition

Regular price: $39.99

Add to cart

The Life Application Bible Commentary (17 vols.)

Regular price: $125.99

Add to cart

Life Application Study Bible Notes

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

ESV Gospel Transformation Study Bible: Notes

Regular price: $49.99

Add to cart

Related content

• What Is Hermeneutics? | Kevin Vanhoozer
• All about Hermeneutics: A Guide to Interpreting God’s Word Faithfully
• What Is Exegesis & Why Is It Important? Plus, How to Start
• Legalism, License & the Tightrope of Bible Application
• On Expository Preaching | David Helm

For many abuse survivors, the Bible has been used as a weapon rather than as a source of healing. Yet Scripture reveals a God who aims to bring shalom and is fiercely concerned for the oppressed. In this episode of Logos Live, Kirk E. Miller sits down with Dr. Steven Tracy to tackle the sobering reality of how Scripture is often misused in contexts of abuse and how we can reclaim it as a source of protection and healing for survivors. Together they explore important hermeneutical principles for using and applying Scripture as a medicine rather than a poison.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more

Episode guest: Steven Tracy

Steven Tracy is the President and International Director of Mending the Soul Ministries. Steve and his wife, Celestia, founded Mending the Soul in 2003 to create best-practice Christian resources for understanding and responding to abuse. Steve earned his PhD in biblical studies from the University of Sheffield in England and taught theology and ethics at Phoenix Seminary for 30 years. Before coming on staff with MTS, Steve pastored for 15 years in three different churches.

• Link

Episode synopsis

Christians turn to Scripture as a source of comfort and guidance. Yet, as Steven Tracy observes, the Bible is not always used as intended: as a source of life. For many survivors of abuse, the very Word of God, which God gave for healing and renewal, has been weaponized to excuse, justify, or even afflict abuse.

How do we know what constitutes health or harm?

To make assessments of “harmful” uses of Scripture, are we just imposing an outside standard to determine whether we deem it good or damaging?

To the contrary, Scripture serves as its own standard for understanding its proper use to heal or misuse to harm. The Bible’s grand story is one of restoring shalom (peace, wholeness, flourishing). It is an account of God’s ultimate healing which culminates in the new heavens and the new earth. So we look to God’s design in creation and his work of redemption to define what health and healing look like. It is the world as God intended it to be, where the image of God (imago dei) in every person is respected and nurtured.

Conversely, harm is defined as anything that attacks this original design or hinders a person from becoming who God intended them to be. Abuse is a direct assault on the image of God.

What’s at stake in misusing Scripture in cases of abuse?

Just because one appeals to the Bible does not make that use of the Bible “biblical.” The devil quotes Scripture, too (Matt 4:1–11)! This misuse of God’s Word is as old as the garden of Eden: “Did God really say … ?” (Gen 3:1). So 2 Peter 3:16 speaks of those who twist Scripture. This twisting is not a benign error. As Peter says, it leads to “destruction.”

To misuse Scripture with abuse victims is to poison the very well from which God intends to renew them. When God’s Word is used to harm or justify and excuse harm, abuse survivors can unfortunately associate God’s Word with its abusive misuse, making it hard to engage Scripture as a source of healing and goodness. When the Bible is misused in cases of abuse, this can cause individuals to doubt the goodness of Scripture. Inasmuch as God’s Word represents God himself, Scripture’s misuse misrepresents God’s character to the abused.

Moreover, when someone uses Scripture to defend, excuse, or perpetrate abuse, they are engaging in spiritual abuse, the misuse of God’s authority to do harm. As Steven Tracy helpfully put it,

While any type of abuse can be extremely damaging, we have found that spiritual abuse is often some of the most damaging due to the way it shatters the very resources we need for health and healing.⁶⁰

How can we use Scripture well, to heal and not harm?

How can we avoid abusing Scripture when applying it to cases of abuse? Steven highlights two fundamental rules for anyone handling the Word:

1. Attend to Scripture’s context. Perhaps the most common mistake is ignoring the context of a passage. We must recognize and honor the specific setting of a text. When we take words out of their context, we can make the Bible teach just about anything—which is a frightening prospect.
2. Interpret Scripture with Scripture. Be wary of building an entire moral model on a single, isolated passage. We can easily go astray when we treat one verse as if it is all God has to say on a subject.

Kirk E. Miller describes such misuses as reductionistic interpretations. This approach involves taking complex ideas from Scripture and distilling them into overly simplistic, one-dimensional directives that ignore the overall teaching of Scripture and the reality of a survivor’s experience. By stripping Scripture of its required nuance, reductionistic readings can transform Scriptures into a blunt instrument of condemnation and, frankly, bad counsel.

What is God’s heart for the abused?

Perhaps because the ancient text of Scripture does not utilize our modern terminology, we sometimes mistakenly assume the Bible does not say much, if anything, about abuse.

However, the Bible is saturated with accounts of abuse, from the fatal domestic violence of Cain and Abel in Genesis 4 to the widespread violence that grieved God’s heart in Genesis 6. Rather than sanitizing the text, the Bible is brutally honest about human depravity’s tendency toward abuse. Moreover, the fact that Scripture frequently includes these accounts—such as the sexual assault of Tamar (Gen 38) or the horrific atrocities against women at the end of the book of Judges (Judg 19–21)—demonstrates a concern for abuse. God is neither silent nor indifferent. He intentionally highlights the plight of the oppressed against the wickedness of their abusers.

Scripture also testifies directly to God’s heart for the oppressed. For example, in Exodus 3:7–8, the text explicitly states that God saw the affliction of the Israelites, heard their cries, was concerned about their suffering, and came down to deliver them. Likewise, Jesus expresses his fierce intolerance for abuse. For those who cause any of his “little ones” to sin, he declares it would have been far better had they been drowned in the sea with a massive millstone attached to their neck (Matt 18:6). That would have been a better fate than what he has in store for them! This is how seriously Christ takes the abuse of his people.

Jesus: abused for the abused

Many still grapple with the “why” of abuse. Although our attempts at an answer often feel unsatisfying, Steven points us to the person and work of Jesus Christ. The cross is the ultimate evidence of God’s care. Does God truly care for the abused? The cross resounds with a loud, “Yes!”

God took on flesh and allowed himself to be abused in the most horrific manner imaginable. He did this to defeat evil and eventually put an end to all our suffering. We may not have a full answer for the problem of evil. But we do know how God has answered evil through the work of Christ.

Scripture reveals a God who is highly attuned to the cries of the broken and who is actively working a plan of redemption that will one day end all tears (Rev 7:17; 21:4; Isa 25:8).

Share your thoughts

Why is the abuse of the Bible so harmful, especially for the abused? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Steven Tracy’s suggested resources

To Heal or Harm: Scripture’s Use as Poison or Medicine for Abuse Survivors

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

To Heal or Harm: Scripture’s Use as Poison or Medicine for Abuse Survivors (Audio)

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

Mending the Soul, Second Edition: Understanding and Healing Abuse

Regular price: $14.49

Add to cart

Mending the Soul, Second Edition: Understanding and Healing Abuse (Audio)

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

Redeeming Power: Understanding Authority and Abuse in the Church

Regular price: $12.09

Add to cart

Redeeming Power: Understanding Authority and Abuse in the Church (audio)

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

A Church Called Tov: Forming a Goodness Culture That Resists Abuses of Power and Promotes Healing

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

A Church Called Tov: Forming a Goodness Culture That Resists Abuses of Power and Promotes Healing (audio)

Regular price: $19.95

Add to cart

Related content

• What Does the Bible Say About Abuse? Probably More Than You Think
• On Spiritual Abuse | Michael Kruger
• Recovering from Spiritual Abuse: A Practical Pathway Toward Healing
• Ministering to Trauma Survivors: 3 Lessons from the Book of Job
• What Does the Bible Say About Church Hurt? 5 Lessons

Luke records that the early Jesus followers in Jerusalem “held everything in common” (Acts 2:44–45; 4:32–37). Does this mean the early church abolished private property and embraced a sort of communalism? Luke-Acts scholar Darrell L. Bock joins Kirk E. Miller on this episode of What in the Word? to discuss these texts and what they might mean for us today.

Follow the show on YouTube, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and more.

Connect with us

Ready to increase biblical literacy? Like and share. To go the extra mile, leave us a review on your preferred platform. 

See all of our episodes.

Episode guest: Darrell Bock

Darrell L. Bock is Senior Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas, Texas, as well as Executive Director of Cultural Engagement for the Hendricks Center there. He is also a New York Times bestselling author. The author of around forty books, his special fields of study involve hermeneutics, the use of the Old Testament in the New, Luke-Acts, the historical Jesus, Gospel studies, and the integration of theology and culture. He is a graduate of the University of Texas (BA), Dallas Theological Seminary (ThM), and the University of Aberdeen (PhD). He is married to Sally and has two daughters (both married), a son, three grandsons, and a granddaughter.

• Facebook
• Link

Episode synopsis

Did the early church abolish private property?

Immediately following the events of Pentecost (Acts 2:1–41), Luke describes the early Jerusalem church as selling possessions and distributing the proceeds “as anyone had need” (Acts 2:42–47). Acts 4:32–37 revisits the same pattern in greater detail: Owners of land and houses were selling them and bringing the proceeds to the apostles’ feet, so that “there was no one needy among them.”

To many today, this portrait resembles ideas within modern communism. It raises anxious questions about economic obligations or unrealistic idealism. To others, the text is simply glossed over or so heavily caveated that its entire force is nearly lost.

Yet Luke presents these descriptions as positive profiles of the primitive Christian community. He includes no hint of critique. So what is going on with this text, and what are we to do with it?

Luke’s positive portrayals of the early church

As Dr. Darrell Bock points out, Luke offers six positive traits of this early Jerusalem church (Acts 2:42–47):

1. The apostolic teaching
2. Fellowship and relationship with one another
3. The breaking of bread (hospitality and the Lord’s Table)
4. Prayer and engagement with God
5. Ministry to those outside the community, testified by signs and wonders
6. A family-like unity, displayed by even selling possessions to meet each other’s material needs

The placement of this description (Acts 2:42–47) immediately follows the pouring out of the Spirit on this people at Pentecost (Acts 2:1–41). In other words, Luke is detailing the transformation that occurs when the Holy Spirit takes up residence in a community. This passage provides an answer to the question, What does a Spirit-filled people look like?

So too, Luke’s description in Acts 4:32–37 follows the church’s prayer for boldness (Acts 4:23–31) after Peter and John’s arrest and release (Acts 3:1–4:22). Darrell regards this prayer as one of the most striking moments in Acts. Faced with their first persecution, the believers do not pray for the hostility to stop or for judgment on their enemies. Instead, they pray for boldness to keep preaching and serving. Thus, the “signs and wonders” they ask for are not mere displays of power but instruments of care, ways of demonstrating God’s goodness to a hostile audience.

Following this prayer, the church is again “filled with the Holy Spirit” (Acts 4:31), which sets the frame for the profile that follows (Acts 4:32–37): The “full number” of believers were of “one heart and soul,” no one regarded their possessions as their own, and they held all in common, such that “there was not a needy person among them.” Those who owned land and real estate sold them and brought the proceeds to the apostles so it could be distributed as needed. They held their material possessions with open hands, as resources with which to meet the needs of others (so also Acts 6:1–7). Luke identifies Barnabas as a specific exemplar (Acts 4:36–37).

In direct contrast to Barnabas, Luke follows this with a negative example of Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5:1–11). The latter sold a piece of property, kept a portion of the proceeds for themselves, yet presented the remainder as though it were the full amount. They were both struck dead.

Key exegetical details that clarify

Peter’s rebuke of Ananias and Sapphira, however, makes clear that this sacrificial giving was voluntary; no one was required to sell their possessions and give away the proceeds. As Peter says to Ananias and Sapphira, “Before it was sold, did it not belong to you? And when it was sold, was the money not at your disposal?” (Acts 5:4). The issue wasn’t simply that Ananias and Sapphira had kept “part of the proceeds from the sale of the land” (Acts 5:3). The property was theirs. The money from the sale was theirs. Rather, their sin was lying, offering a portion of the proceeds as if it were the entirety of the proceeds (Acts 5:1–11). In other words, they wanted the reputation of a Barnabas without the sacrifices of a Barnabas. They pretended to be generous without actually practicing generosity, and so lied to the Holy Spirit.

This episode, however, makes clear that the sharing of possessions in Acts was entirely voluntary. No one was compelled to sell their possessions or hand over what they owned. No one was required to surrender private property as a condition of membership, such as in the Qumran community. Rather, this giving was an expression of genuine, sacrificial, Spirit-empowered care, not a community rule or an economic policy.

Additionally, the verbs Luke uses in Greek to describe this practice are in the imperfect. The imperfect presents a verb’s action, not as a once-for-all snapshot like the aorist, but as something ongoing. As Darrell maintains, the imperfects here seem to have an iterative function, meaning this selling and giving was a habitual pattern within the community, not a single complete act in which everyone liquidated all their assets. Rather, this sort of generosity arose again and again as needs appeared.

Use the Grammar section in Logos’s Exegetical Guide to locate comments on your passage within Greek and Hebrew Grammars.

For instance, later in Acts 12:12, immediately after God miraculously freed him from prison, Peter goes to the house of Mary, the mother of John Mark, where many believers are gathered and praying. We see here that Mary clearly still owns her house; she has not sold it. This indicates that not everyone in this early Jesus community had sold all their property. That said, we do see Mary using her house sacrificially, opening it up to the believers. Her hospitality is then another mode of the generosity the Spirit produces—using what one has in service to others, rather than clinging to it as merely one’s own.

Descriptive—not prescriptive—yet commended

Some point out that the Jerusalem church’s generosity apparently left it financially depleted, requiring Paul later to organize a collection from gentile churches on its behalf (2 Corinthians 8). On this reading, the early community’s radical giving was admirable but ultimately unsustainable, a cautionary tale rather than a model.

Yet, as Darrell points out, the picture Luke paints of this early community is unqualifiedly positive. He provides this portrait to show what Spirit-filled generosity looks like in practice. In fact, as Kirk E. Miller points out, Luke’s phrase “there was no one needy among them” seems to be a deliberate allusion to Deuteronomy 15, which speaks of the sabbatical year and its intent that “there will be no poor among you” (Deut 15:4). In other words, this new covenant community is becoming what God always intended his people, Israel, to be. The Spirit is realizing what the law of Moses had always aimed toward.

When interpreting the Bible, we ought to distinguish between what is descriptive vs. prescriptive: Just because the Bible describes (recounts) something, does not mean it prescribes (commands) that thing. In fact, the Bible describes many things (e.g., murder, stealing, assault) we ought not repeat. So Acts, as narrative, describes what happened in the early church without necessarily prescribing such things as normative or things we are meant to replicate.

Yet this distinction does not mean the Bible’s narratives are neutral, without an implicit message for us. In the case of Acts 2:44–45 and Acts 4:32–37, although the specific actions recounted here are not prescribed, they are nonetheless commended as exemplary of the type of generosity that ought to characterize Christian communities. They aim to stir the reader.

As Darrell points out, this fits how ancient biography functioned: You observe virtues and vices such that you are persuaded, even if not commanded. Narrative teaches, among other things, by example.

Additionally, the early church’s generosity was an outworking of Jesus’s teaching.

• Jesus taught, “Sell your possessions, and give to the needy” (Luke 12:33).
• So Jesus told the rich young ruler to sell everything (Luke 18:18–30).
• Jesus commended Zacchaeus for giving half of his possessions to the poor and restoring fourfold what he had stolen (Luke 19:1–10).
• On the other hand, Jesus told a parable of a man who built bigger barns to store his material riches yet was not “rich” toward God (Luke 12:13–21).

Thus, the Jerusalem believers may well have understood themselves as simply doing what Jesus said. In this way, Acts 2:44–45 and Acts 4:32–37 present a descriptive account of a prescriptive ethic already taught by Jesus himself.

The practical significance

As these passages exemplify, we are ultimately stewards, not owners, of what we possess. We should ask ourselves, How can I use what God has entrusted to me to serve others? As Galatians 6:10 says, “As we have opportunity, let us do good to everyone, and especially to those who are of the household of faith.” See also 1 Timothy 6:6–10, 17–19, which provides some of the New Testament’s most direct teaching on the Christian’s use of wealth.

Within the church, this means treating fellow believers as genuine family, people whose material needs are your concern. This finds visible expression in things like the church’s care for its widows (1 Timothy 5:9–16; see also Acts 6:1–7), the kind of coordinated giving Paul describes in 2 Corinthians 8, or a church’s well-funded, actively used benevolence ministry, where the church has decided to set resources aside to care for the needs of its members as they may arise. These things translate the spirit of Acts 2:44–45 and Acts 4:32–37 into the ordinary life of a congregation.

Advice for those teaching or preaching

Clearly explain the text, noting the voluntary nature of its giving. Yet do not so hedge the text (it’s not communalism; it was voluntary; it’s descriptive not prescriptive) that you drain the text of its intended force. Caveats are necessary, but they are not the point. Rather, the text’s point centers on the exceptional, exemplary nature of this Spirit-filled community’s life together. Don’t lose that point in the midst of your qualifications.

So allow the passage be challenging. Allow the congregation to squirm under its conviction as needed. The passage presses us to ask, Am I attentive to the needs of those around me? Do I see my finances and possessions as existing for myself? Or do I hold my resources loosely enough that I am free to serve others with them—even at great cost to myself? As C.S. Lewis said,

I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I am afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare. In other words, if our expenditure on comforts, luxuries, amusements, etc., is up to the standard common among those with the same income as our own, we are probably giving away too little. If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are too small. There ought to be things we should like to do and cannot do because our charities expenditure excludes them.⁶¹

Logos values thoughtful and engaging discussions on important biblical topics. However, the views and interpretations presented in this episode are those of the individuals speaking and do not necessarily reflect the official position of Logos. We recognize that Christians may hold different perspectives on this passage, and we welcome diverse engagement and respectful dialogue.

Let us know what you think

What might it look like to practice the spirit of Acts 2 and 4 in our churches today? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Darrell Bock’s recommended resources on Luke-Acts

Luke, Volume 1 & Volume 2 (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament | BECNT)

Regular price: $134.99

Add to cart

Acts (Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament | BECNT)

Regular price: $64.99

Add to cart

Acts: An Exegetical Commentary (4 vols.)

Regular price: $269.99

Add to cart

A Theology of Luke and Acts: God’s Promised Program, Realized for All Nations (Biblical Theology of the New Testament | BTNT)

Regular price: $42.99

Add to cart

Additional suggested resources on Acts

The Message of Acts (The Bible Speaks Today | BST)

Regular price: $15.99

Add to cart

The Acts of the Apostles (Pillar New Testament Commentary | PNTC)

Regular price: $75.99

Add to cart

Acts (Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament | ZECNT)

Regular price: $59.99

Add to cart

Dictionary of the Later New Testament and Its Developments (IVP Bible Dictionary)

Regular price: $49.99

Add to cart

Mobile Ed: Darrell Bock Luke and Acts Bundle (3 courses)

Regular price: $559.99

Add to cart

Mobile Ed: NT211 Introducing the Gospels and Acts: Their Background, Nature, and Purpose (6 hour course)

Regular price: $229.99

Add to cart

Related articles

• Is It Wrong to Want to Be Rich? | Malcolm Foley on 1 Timothy 6:6–10
• To Have or to Hold? What the Bible Says About Money
• Baptism of the Holy Spirit: What It Means & How We Get It Wrong
• Acts of Persuasion: Why Did Gentiles Convert to Christianity?
• Women in Acts: Women’s Role in the Birth of the Church

If you want to go deeper into Scripture, one tool helps more than almost any other: a great study Bible. That’s why many pastors and teachers recommend that every Christian own at least one.

The Bible was written by dozens of authors in several languages across thousands of years. The books of the Bible emerged in cultures very different from each other—and all very different from our culture today. A good study Bible helps bridge the gap between us and the original writers (and readers) of the Bible. It explains historical background, literary context, and theological connections that might be easy for us to miss on our own. Whether you’re new to studying the Bible or looking to go deeper, the right study Bible can become one of the most valuable tools in your spiritual life.

But there’s one problem.

There are dozens of excellent study Bible options out there. Some focus on theology. Others emphasize archaeology, application, or biblical languages. With so many choices, finding the best study Bible for your needs can feel overwhelming.

Table of contents

In this guide, we’ll consider:

• What are study Bibles?
• Why use a study Bible?
• What are different types of study Bibles?
• What makes a good study Bible?
• What are the best study Bibles?
• FAQs
• Conclusion

What are study Bibles?

A standard Bible contains only the biblical text. A study Bible, however, includes additional tools designed to help you better understand Scripture. These often include:

• Verse-by-verse explanatory notes
• Historical background
• Detailed charts and maps
• Book introductions
• Articles on theology or biblical themes

In most study Bibles, the main text of Scripture appears at the top of the page, and the study notes appear below it. These notes are written by scholars who explain the historical, literary, and theological context of what you are reading.

In short, a study Bible is a miniature library of biblical scholarship placed next to the text of Scripture.

How do study Bible notes get written and reviewed?

Most major study Bibles are written by teams of biblical scholars. For example, the widely respected ESV Study Bible involved over ninety scholars and editors.

The process typically includes:

• Study notes written by subject experts
• Editorial review
• Theological review
• Final proofreading and revisions

This collaborative process helps ensure accuracy and clarity.

Are study Bibles biased toward certain interpretations?

Yes, at least to some degree. Every study Bible reflects the theological perspective of its contributors. Some lean Reformed. Others are Pentecostal. Many study Bibles are developed exclusively by scholars from a specific tradition (e.g., evangelical, Catholic, Orthodox).

That’s not necessarily a problem. But it’s wise to read the notes thoughtfully and remember they represent interpretations, not inspired Scripture.

Why use a study Bible?

The Bible was written long ago in cultures very different from our own. Without help, some passages can be difficult to understand. A good study Bible helps you:

• Understand historical context
• Recognize literary structure
• See connections between passages
• Grasp theological themes
• Apply Scripture to life

In other words, it helps you read the Bible more thoughtfully and accurately.

Do study Bibles help with understanding difficult passages?

Absolutely. A good study Bible can explain:

• Confusing Old Testament laws
• Difficult prophetic imagery
• Uncommon cultural practices
• Divisive theological topics

Instead of guessing what a passage means, you gain insight from scholars who have spent years studying the text.

What are the advantages of a digital study Bible?

Digital tools make study even easier. Platforms like the Logos Bible app allow you to:

• Conveniently access and open up your study Bible right to your passage (using tools like Logos’s Factbook and Insights).
• Open and compare multiple study Bibles at once.
• Sync your study Bibles with your Bible as you study and scroll.
• Quickly search your study Bibles’ comments or use Logos’s AI-powered Study Assistant to find answers from your resources, including your study Bibles.
• Easily record and save your own personal insights.
• Take your resources and study tools with you wherever you go.

Instead of flipping through several physical books, you can explore multiple digital resources in seconds, dramatically accelerating study. And alongside your study Bibles, Logos allows you to quickly compare translations, access original language tools, get answers to your theological questions, and more—empowering study for serious Bible readers.

Your Bible study resources are more powerful in Logos.
Try for yourself—for free!

What are different types of study Bibles?

Not all study Bibles aim to do the same thing. Understanding the main categories can help you choose the right one.

Commentary-based study Bibles

This is the most common type. These study Bibles explain the text verse by verse, much like a commentary. They contain detailed explanatory notes, theological articles, and historical background. For many readers, these are among the best study Bibles for serious study.

Devotional study Bibles

Some study Bibles focus primarily on application and spiritual growth, with notes that help readers ask practical questions about how the passage can shape their lives. For many believers, these are the best sort of study Bible for personal devotions.

Archaeological and historical study Bibles

Some study Bibles focus on the world behind the text. They immerse you in the geography, archaeology, and culture of the Bible. If you want to visualize the places where biblical events occurred, this type of study Bible can be incredibly helpful.

Topical study Bibles

Some study Bibles focus on specific themes or perspectives. Examples include chronological Bibles that arrange events historically. Others might focus on a specific denominational or theological perspective.

Academic study Bibles

There are a handful of study Bibles designed primarily for classroom and scholarly study rather than devotional reading. The notes tend to focus on historical background, literary structure, textual criticism, and scholarly debates about the biblical text. For readers who enjoy digging deeply into the academic study of Scripture, they provide a fascinating window into the world of biblical scholarship.

What makes a good study Bible?

Before choosing a study Bible, it helps to know what to look for. The best study Bibles typically include:

1. Clear explanatory notes. The notes should illuminate the text without overwhelming it.
2. Strong scholarship. Trusted contributors and editors matter.
3. Helpful cross-references. These reveal how Scripture interprets Scripture.
4. Book introductions. These provide historical and literary context.
5. Visual resources. Maps, charts, timelines, and diagrams improve engagement and comprehension.
6. Theological articles. Many study Bibles include essays on major doctrines and other theological topics.

What are the best study Bibles?

Here are several widely respected study Bibles used by pastors, teachers, and everyday Bible readers. I provide them in the order of the various types listed above.

1. ESV Study Bible

If you ask pastors and serious Bible students to name the best study Bible available today, the ESV Study Bible almost always makes the list. It’s incredibly thorough.

The notes lean theological and explanatory, helping you see how passages connect across the whole story of Scripture. It can feel a little dense at times, but that depth is exactly why so many keep coming back to it.

ESV Study Bible (Notes only)

Regular price: $39.99

Add to cart

ESV Study Bible (Bible and Notes)

Regular price: $44.99

Add to cart

2. NIV Study Bible

The NIV Study Bible has been helping Christians understand the Bible for decades, and for good reason. It strikes a really nice balance between clarity and depth. The notes explain historical context, cultural details, and tricky passages without overwhelming the reader.

For many people (myself included), this was the first study Bible that showed us how much more there was to discover in Scripture.

NIV Study Bible: Notes (Fully Revised Edition)

Regular price: $43.99

Add to cart

3. CSB Study Bible

The CSB Study Bible is a great all-around option that combines solid scholarship with an approachable tone. It doesn’t feel quite as dense as some academic study Bibles, but it still gives you meaningful insight into the text. I often recommend it to people who want a serious study Bible that still feels readable enough for everyday use.

CSB Study Bible (notes only)

Regular price: $23.99

Add to cart

CSB Study Bible (Bible and Notes)

Regular price: $31.99

Add to cart

4. Life Application Study Bible

The Life Application Study Bible (available in NLT, NIV, NKJV, and KJV) takes a slightly different approach. Instead of focusing mainly on historical explanations, its notes are designed to help you apply Scripture to everyday life. As you read, the notes constantly ask, “What does this mean for the way you live?” That makes it one of the most helpful study Bibles for personal devotions or for people who want to connect Bible reading directly to spiritual growth.

Life Application Study Bible Notes

Regular price: $24.99

Add to cart

5. NIV Application Bible

The NIV Application Bible is built around the idea that understanding Scripture happens in three movements:

1. what the text meant originally,
2. what theological principles it teaches, and
3. how those truths apply today.

The notes follow that pattern, guiding you step-by-step from the ancient world of the Bible to your own life.

This Bible uses study notes drawn from the longstanding NIV Application Commentary series. It’s thoughtful without being overwhelming, which makes it especially helpful for readers who want to grow both intellectually and spiritually.

NIV Application Bible Notes: Bringing the Ancient Message of the Bible into Your World (NIV Application Commentary Resources)

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

6. Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible

One of the most eye-opening ways to understand the Bible better is to learn more about the ancient world it came from. That’s exactly what the Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible does.

Available in the NIV, NKJV, NRSV, and RVR (Spanish), it focuses heavily on the customs, beliefs, and daily life of the ancient Near East and Greco-Roman worlds. Reading the Bible with this kind of cultural insight often makes familiar passages feel brand new.

Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible Notes

Regular price: $39.99

Add to cart

7. CSB Holy Land Illustrated Study Bible

The CSB Holy Land Illustrated Bible is one of the most visually engaging study Bibles you’ll find. It’s filled with photographs, maps, and illustrations that help you picture the places where biblical events happened.

If you’ve ever wished you could walk through the geography of the Bible or see the landscapes where these stories unfolded, this Bible does a fantastic job bringing that world to life.

CSB Holy Land Illustrated Bible Notes

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

8. NET Full Notes Edition

The NET Full Notes Edition is truly unique among study Bibles. Instead of traditional commentary-style notes, it includes over sixty-thousand notes from the translators of the New English Translation (NET). These notes explain why the translation team made specific decisions when moving from Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek into English.

If you’re curious about how Bible translation works, or you enjoy digging into textual details, this Bible is a treasure trove.

The NET Bible: Full Notes Edition (2nd ed.)

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

The NET Bible, Second Edition (NET) with Reverse Interlinear

Regular price: $29.99

Add to cart

The NET Bible: Full Notes Edition (1st ed.)

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

9. New Interpreter’s Study Bible

The New Interpreter’s Study Bible is a thoughtful option for readers who want to engage Scripture alongside serious academic scholarship. This Bible features the NRSV translation (with Apocrypha) and is based on a twelve-volume commentary series from a diverse team of biblical scholars. The tone feels more like a seminary classroom than a devotional guide, which can be helpful if you want to wrestle deeply with the biblical text and see how scholars approach difficult passages.

10. The New Oxford Annotated Bible

The New Oxford Annotated Bible has long been one of the most widely used study Bibles in academic settings. It’s the kind of Bible you’ll often see assigned in university or seminary courses. The notes focus heavily on historical context, literary structure, and scholarly interpretation.

If you’re curious about how biblical scholars analyze the text and its ancient context, this study Bible gives you a front-row seat to that conversation.

The New Oxford Annotated Bible: An Ecumenical Study Bible, Third Edition

Regular price: $14.99

Add to cart

11. SBL Study Bible

The SBL Study Bible is one of the newer entries in the study Bible world, and it reflects the work of the Society of Biblical Literature. It’s designed with academic study in mind, offering insights drawn from contemporary biblical scholarship and research.

What I appreciate about this one is that it helps readers see how modern scholars approach the Bible’s history, languages, and literary forms, making it a great resource for readers who want to explore Scripture through a more contemporary scholarly lens.

FAQs

Which is the best study Bible for beginners?

Many beginners benefit from the NIV Application Bible or the Life Application Study Bible. These study Bibles offer clear explanations, helpful introductions, and practical insights. They provide guidance without overwhelming new readers.

Which is the best study Bible for serious Bible study?

Readers looking for deeper scholarship often choose the ESV Study Bible or the NET Full Notes Edition. These resources provide extensive explanatory notes and detailed translation insights. They are particularly helpful for pastors, teachers, and advanced students.

Which is the best study Bible for historical and cultural context?

Two excellent options include the Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible (available in multiple translations) or the CSB Holy Land Illustrated Bible. These Bibles highlight archaeological discoveries, cultural practices, and historical settings that can greatly enrich your understanding of the biblical world.

How can I get the most from my study Bible?

Once you choose a study Bible, the next step is to learn to use it. Here are three simple habits.

1. Develop consistency

Consistency matters more than intensity. Choose a regular time and place to read. A mere fifteen to twenty minutes a day can lead to remarkable growth over time.

2. Read actively

Don’t just skim. Engage the text. Highlight or underline things that stand out. Write down questions that come to mind. Spend time journaling your insights. Active reading helps the truth stick.

3. Discuss what you learn

One of the best ways to deepen understanding is conversation. Talk with your spouse or a friend. Ask your pastor about your questions. Share with your small group. Scripture often becomes clearer when we process it together.

Conclusion

So which is the best study Bible? The “best” ultimately depends on your goals. Do you want theological depth, historical context, devotional guidance, or translation insight? Here are the best by category:

• Best overall: ESV Study Bible
• Best for beginners: NIV Study Bible
• Best for application: Life Application Study Bible
• Best for historical context: Cultural Backgrounds Study Bible
• Best for translation insight: NET Bible Full Notes Edition
• Best for academics: New Oxford Annotated Bible

That said, the best study Bible is the one you actually use, the one that helps you read and understand Scripture consistently.

Christians today have access to extraordinary study tools. But the goal is not simply to collect resources. The goal is to know God through his Word. A great study Bible can serve that goal by guiding you into deeper understanding, richer theology, and stronger faith.

So, choose one that fits your needs. Open it often. And let it guide you deeper into the story of Scripture.

Share your thoughts

Which study Bible is your favorite? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Related articles

• 3 Things You Should Look for in a Good Study Bible
• 10 Grievances about Study Bibles (& Which Are Best)
• 10 Single-Volume Commentaries, Suggested by Logos Users
• Bible Dictionaries: What They Are & Why They Matter
• The Definitive Guide to Bible Commentaries: Types, Perspectives, and Use

What do all Christians have in common?

When browsing social media, you might think Christians have little in common—besides our ongoing disagreements over politics, modes of baptism, proper use of spiritual gifts, interpreting the end times, models of Trinitarianism, and much more. Understandably, we may identify ourselves as Christians, but we tend to add specific denominational or theological modifiers (e.g., evangelical, Reformed, Pentecostal, Arminian, dispensational, etc.). It’s become like introducing oneself: “Hi, I’m so-and-so, and I’m a [fill in the blank].”

Yet despite our theological and denominational differences,⁶² Christians share a common identity: Above all else, we are all disciples of Jesus Christ.

But what exactly is a disciple, and what is discipleship?

What is a disciple and discipleship?

Sometimes a word or phrase becomes overused to the point that we use it without clearly explaining or agreeing on its meaning. For instance, we might throw around “gospel-centered” without clearly defining what the gospel is (and isn’t)—or what it actually means for our ministries to be “centered” around it.⁶³ The same is true for the words “disciple” and “discipleship.”

Simply put, a disciple of Jesus is a Christian (see Acts 11:26).⁶⁴ As Peter Morden says, “All disciples of Jesus are Christians and all Christians are disciples.”⁶⁵

The word disciple refers to “an adherent, pupil, apprentice, or follower. More specifically, a ‘disciple’ is regularly defined in the realm of knowledge and learning. … A disciple is thus someone who learns, who understands, who gains wisdom.”⁶⁶ Thus, disciples of Jesus are not just believers in Jesus. We are followers, learners, imitators, and students of our Master Teacher, Jesus. Disciples are believers who believe, followers who follow, learners who learn.

Discipleship, then, is the process of learning from Jesus, following his ways and words, and teaching others to do likewise.⁶⁷ Paul models this approach of discipleship in Philippians 4:9. By helping others become more like Christ through instruction and imitation, he tells the Philippians to “do” (CSB) or “put into practice” (NIV) what they’ve “learned,” “received,” “heard,” and “seen” in him.⁶⁸

In discipleship, what we do (following Jesus) reflects who we are (followers of Jesus; Matt 16:24; 28:19–20; John 8:31–32; 15:8). Being a disciple involves both our identity and our actions—who we are and what we do.

Your books are smarter and more powerful in Logos.
Start your free trial today!

5 notable books on discipleship

Of course, grasping the meaning of discipleship is one thing. Living it out is another.

So if you’re looking to go deeper, the following books are among the most helpful I’ve found.

1. Theology as Discipleship, by Keith L. Johnson

Sometimes we divide Christians into two groups: intellectual theology nerds and practical Jesus followers. You either have academic interests (a thinker) or you’re into practical application (a doer).

As Keith Johnson’s students often ask him, “What difference does theology actually make for our lives?” and “Shouldn’t we just focus on following Jesus?”⁶⁹ Those are valid questions, especially as we consider what discipleship entails.

Johnson contends that believers ought not to choose between theology and discipleship, since the two should inform one another: The way to live out discipleship is through the discipline of theology.⁷⁰ If learning is central to being a disciple (see above), we follow Jesus by studying his Word (theology), which then guides our actions (application).

In other words, studying theology is part of discipleship: Teachers and pastors teach others to discipline the mind through theological study. This then guides the heart to obey Jesus and equips us to help others do the same through his Word.

Theology is not secondary to discipleship. Theology informs discipleship.

Theology as Discipleship

Regular price: $19.99

Add to cart

2. Deep Discipleship: How the Church Can Make Whole Disciples of Jesus, by J. T. English

English’s central insight is that everyone is being discipled—shaped, formed, or influenced—either by the world or by the church.⁷¹ Two key takeaways from this stand out:

1. Deep discipleship means churches need more Bible, theology, spiritual disciplines, gospel, and Christ, not less.
2. The goal of deep discipleship focuses on God, not on church growth or church programs.⁷²

Also helpful: While churches often choose between Sunday school and small groups, English recognizes the value of both contexts for discipleship. Disciples benefit from being mentored in theological instruction (Sunday school) and imitation (small groups).⁷³

Church leaders will find this book especially useful for understanding how to cultivate followers of Jesus across various settings: church services, Sunday school, small groups, and even theological training programs or Bible institutes. Deep discipleship means more theology and more Jesus, not less.

Deep Discipleship: How the Church Can Make Whole Disciples of Jesus

Regular price: $17.99

Add to cart

3. Discipling: How to Help Others Follow Jesus, by Mark Dever

For those seeking a straightforward introduction, Mark Dever’s book covers the key parts of discipling:

• the what (the nature of discipleship)
• the where (the place of discipleship)
• the how (the process of discipleship)

Yet Dever first clarifies that being a “disciple of Christ … does not begin with something we do. It begins with something Christ did.”⁷⁴ We become disciples not by first acting but by believing in Christ’s perfect obedience on our behalf. Christians become followers of Jesus, but we don’t become Christians by following Jesus: Our acceptance precedes our obedience (Eph 2:8–10; Titus 3:4–8).

Dever keeps it simple: Discipleship according to Scripture is about following Christ and teaching others to do the same. It involves obeying Jesus by loving God and neighbor, demonstrated through teaching God’s Word and modeled within the local church. While individual believers are to make other disciples, Dever argues that the local church is the primary discipler of believers.⁷⁵

Further, discipling isn’t just about mentoring other believers. It also involves helping non-Christians come to know Christ. In other words, discipling includes evangelism (Matt 28:19–20).⁷⁶

Discipling: How to Help Others Follow Jesus (9Marks Building Healthy Churches Series)

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

4. Hearers and Doers: A Pastor’s Guide to Making Disciples Through Scripture and Doctrine, by Kevin J. Vanhoozer

This book is intended for pastors, and its title draws on James 1:22–25 and Jesus’s call for how true disciples respond to him: by hearing and doing (Matt 7:24). Vanhoozer’s big idea is that true disciples are those who hear and do Christ’s word, and the job of the pastor is to make disciples of Christ by training them toward that end.⁷⁷

For Vanhoozer, then, pastors make disciples by teaching and training believers to read the Bible properly, namely, to be hearers and doers, spiritually fit for godliness (1 Cor 11:1; Eph 4:11–12; 1 Tim 4:12; Titus 2:7; 1 Pet 5:3).⁷⁸ This is what truly shapes people into disciples who imitate Christ (Luke 8:21; 11:28).

Finally, this very pattern should be reflected in pastors, who themselves listen to and live by Scripture and doctrine (Matt 4:4; 1 Tim 4:6, 15–16). Pastors disciple others through preaching and practice—by their own hearing and doing.

Hearers and Doers: A Pastor’s Guide to Making Disciples Through Scripture and Doctrine

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

5. The Imperfect Disciple: Grace for People Who Can’t Get Their Act Together, by Jared C. Wilson

Wilson loves to write books that consistently remind his readers to know, love, and follow Jesus above everything else.

So here, Wilson writes with raw honesty and transparency, not to those who have it all together or have everything figured out, but to those who may have encountered discipleship books with unrealistic expectations. His book is for everyday disciples—those like me and possibly you—who struggle to pursue discipleship.⁷⁹

While other books on discipleship helpfully outline how to disciple and be discipled, Wilson warns that following such programs can often lead to disappointment, discouragement, and despair, particularly when we find ourselves thinking we can become better disciples by focusing on discipleship itself—rather than on Jesus (Matt 11:28–30; Heb 12:2–3).⁸⁰ But following Jesus is not primarily about doing but about being with him. It is not primarily about behaving but about beholding, with behaving flowing from that beholding (2 Cor 3:18). Only by his grace can we believe, behold, and behave.

The Imperfect Disciple: Grace for People Who Can’t Get Their Act Together

Regular price: $11.00

Add to cart

Share your thoughts

What books on discipleship might you add? Join us in the Word by Word group to share your thoughts.

Additional resources on discipleship

Mobile Ed: Discipleship Training Bundle (3 courses)

Regular price: $499.99

Add to cart

Bill Hull Discipleship Collection (4 vols.)

Regular price: $59.99

Add to cart

Design for Discipleship Collection (8 vols.)

Regular price: $49.99

Add to cart

Transforming Discipleship: Making Disciples a Few at a Time

Regular price: $7.99

Add to cart

Discipleship (Reader’s Edition)

Regular price: $9.99

Add to cart

Patterns of Discipleship in the New Testament

Regular price: $33.99

Add to cart

A Long Obedience in the Same Direction: Discipleship in an Instant Society, Commemorative Edition

Regular price: $13.99

Add to cart

“Here Are Your Gods”: Faithful Discipleship in Idolatrous Times

Regular price: $15.99

Add to cart

Related content

• How the Bible Defines Discipleship: 12 Core Elements
• Does Your Church Have a Discipleship Culture? How to Cultivate It
• Deep Discipleship in a Digital Age: Rethinking Church, Ministry, and Life Together in an Online World
• Family Discipleship: 5 Easy Things You Can Do with Your Kids
• Why Theology Is for Everyone & How the Church Can Provide Training