<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Technical Quarterly - Journal of the Master Brewers Association of the Americas
</title>
    <link>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/default.htm</link>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Master Brewers Association of the America 2011</copyright>
    <description>The Technical Quarterly is an online journal. It features both reviewed and nonreviewed papers covering wide technical aspects of brewing ingredients, the brewing process, brewing by-products, environmental considerations in breweries, beer packaging, and beer flavor and physical stability.</description>
    
    <!-- ping http://feeds.feedburner.com/MBAATechQuarterly at Feedburner:http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/ping -->
   <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MBAATechnicalQuarterly" /><feedburner:info uri="mbaatechnicalquarterly" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
	 <title>Antifoam Performance of Hop Extract Emulsions in Pilot Brewing Trials</title>
	 <description>Authors: Y.-Y. Ford, K. T. Westwood, A. Gahr, A. 
         Rajca Ferreira, K. Wolinska, M. Lad, B. Wolf, and T. 
         Foster. The composition of an antifoam prepared from hop fats and waxes 
      emulsified into water with the aid of sunflower lecithin was investigated 
      to maximize antifoam performance. Pilot brewery trials were conducted, 
      using the hop extract emulsions as antifoam agents during fermentation, to 
      assess both the antifoam performance and the effects on the final beer. 
      Dose rates of 5–25 ppm hop extract successfully suppressed foaming to the 
      same extent as a commercial silicone antifoam, used at the recommended 5 
      mL/hL. Use of the hop extract emulsions increased the apparent utilization 
      of the hop bitter acids from kettle to final beer compared to the control 
      (no antifoam). In addition, the hop extract emulsions also had a positive 
      effect on the final beer foam stability. A simple, rapid, and reproducible 
      shake method was devised to test antifoam performance in the laboratory 
      and this method was found to be a reliable predictor of antifoam 
      performance at pilot brewery scale. Storage trials conducted under 
      ambient and accelerated ageing conditions showed that the antifoam 
      emulsions remained microbiologically stable and effective as antifoams 
      for at least 12 months.</description>
	 <link>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0308-01.htm</link>
	 <guid>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0308-01.htm</guid>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2012 3:00:00 CST</pubDate>
	 </item>     
		
  <item>
	 <title>Feasibility of Lactobacilli Concentration Detection in Beer by Automated Impedance Technique</title>
	 <description>Authors: A. Pompei, M. Grossi, M. 
         Lanzoni, G. Perretti, R. Lazzarini, B. Riccò, and D. 
         Matteuzzi. Product quality is a primary concern in the 
      brewing industry because the presence of high concentrations of bacteria 
      can alter important organoleptic characteristics of the product (such as 
      flavor and aroma defects and turbidity problems). Microbial concentration 
      is usually measured by the standard plate count (SPC) technique, which 
      produces accurate results but is slow and must be performed by laboratory 
      tests with the aid of qualified personnel. This precludes the possibility 
      of on-line monitoring of bacterial concentration at different steps of the 
      production line. This study shows an alternative method based on impedance 
      measurements, which proves to be competitive with SPC since it can detect 
      the microbial concentration of 10(^4) cfu/mL with measurement times as low as 
      10–12 hours against the 24–72 hours needed by SPC. It also features the 
      possibility of industrial automation, thus making it very attractive for 
      microbial screening on brewery production lines. Different media have been 
      tested to obtain the highest bacterial growth rate (i.e., minimizing 
      response time) and accuracy in lactobacilli concentration measured by 
      electrical parameters. The need of selective determination of 
      lactobacilli concentration has been achieved by adding cycloheximide to 
      the samples and using filters of gradual size diameters to separate yeast 
      cells from lactobacilli.</description>
	 <link>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0315-01.htm</link>
	 <guid>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0315-01.htm</guid>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2012 3:00:00 CST</pubDate>
	 </item>     
		
<item>
	 <title>Effect of Storage and Its Impact on Some Parameters Used in Assessing Distilling Wheat Cultivars</title>
	 <description>Authors: R. C. Agu and J. Walker. Wheat varieties of distilling quality were grown at two locations 
      where different nitrogen fertilizer treatments were administered. 
      Relationships between parameters used to assess wheat quality for Scotch 
      whisky grain distilling such as moisture, nitrogen, hardness, and alcohol 
      yield were assessed after harvest and reassessed after one year to 
      determine the effect storage had on wheat quality. Changes observed in 
      these parameters affected wheat quality in different ways. An increase in 
      average wheat alcohol yield (dry weight basis [dwb]) of 1.6% was found for 
      wheat grown at the lower nitrogen site. These samples had a higher average 
      moisture level at harvest, and showed greater moisture loss (average = 
      8.7%) during storage. In contrast, a decrease in average wheat alcohol 
      yield (dwb) of 0.6% was observed for wheat grown at the higher nitrogen 
      site. This set of wheat samples had lower moisture levels at harvest, and 
      lower moisture loss (4.1%) after storage. Both sets of wheat showed 
      marginal increases in total nitrogen content which ranged from 0.01–0.12% 
      for lower and 0.01–0.08% higher nitrogen wheat. When the harvest and 
      stored data was compared, weak correlations for oven moisture (R = 0.2766) 
      and grain hardness (R = 0.1789) were found for wheat varieties grown at 
      the lower nitrogen site, while stronger correlations were observed for 
      moisture (R = 0.6573) and hardness (R = 0.8403) for wheat grown at the 
      higher nitrogen site over the same period. The lower nitrogen wheat, which 
      showed a greater loss of moisture during storage, showed a strong 
      correlation for NIR nitrogen (R = 0.9269) compared to wheat grown at the 
      higher nitrogen site (R = 0.7652). Changes observed for moisture, 
      nitrogen, and hardness of stored wheat appeared to have little effect on 
      alcohol yield. Correlation results for alcohol yield assessed before and 
      after storage for lower nitrogen (R = 0.8616) and higher nitrogen wheat (R 
      = 0.8814) were similar and shows that storage did not have a dramatic 
      effect on wheat alcohol yield. This observation has important commercial 
      value because it demonstrates that storage of wheat does not have a 
      detrimental effect on alcohol yield when such wheat is processed for 
      alcohol production.</description>
	 <link>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0316-01.htm</link>
	 <guid>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0316-01.htm</guid>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2012 3:00:00 CST</pubDate>
	 </item>     
		
<item>
	 <title>Declining Barley Acreage</title>
	 <description>Author: Karen Hertsgaard. Barley acreage in the U.S. has been declining steadily since the 
      1980s and shows no sign of rebounding (Figure 1). In fact, recent reports 
      indicate a possible 35% decrease in production from the 2010 crop, which 
      was a record low production year. However, excellent growing conditions 
      produced record yields and quality in both 2009 and 2010, which has served 
      to fill the short-term needs of maltsters and brewers. Competition from 
      other crops, changes in U.S. farm policy, and disease have all contributed 
      to the decline. The real problem is finding ways to address the decline 
      and endure a long-term supply of quality barley for U.S. companies. This 
      paper will address the causes of declining production, why this is a 
      serious problem for the malting and brewing industries, and how barley 
      stakeholders can address the problem. Multiple groups are working on 
      methods to assist growers to produce more quality barley for malting and 
      brewing. These include the development of new varieties and genetic 
      research, investigations on cropping systems, development of new crop 
      insurance products, and educational activities offered by the Institute of 
      Barley and Malt Sciences and commodity organizations. These projects will 
      be presented and discussed in order to help identify which are potentially 
      most helpful and to determine if other information is needed.</description>
	 <link>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0314-01.htm</link>
	 <guid>http://www.mbaa.com/TechQuarterly/Abstracts/2012/TQ-49-1-0314-01.htm</guid>
	 <pubDate>Mon, 7 May 2012 3:00:00 CST</pubDate>
	 </item>     
		
		
</channel>
</rss>

