<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Information Development</title>
	
	<link>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development</link>
	<description>Developing your information across the enterprise</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MIKE20InformationDevelopment" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
		<title>To Pluto and back</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/g4M2ma2zBaQ/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/07/05/to-pluto-and-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert.hillard</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Information Governance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Strategy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MIKE2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Wray, writing recently in The Guardian, pointed out that the volume of data held is now estimated at 487 billion GB.  To put this in perspective he explained that in printed form this would form a pile that would stretch to Pluto 10 times over.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Wray, writing recently in The Guardian, pointed out that the volume of data held is now estimated at 487 billion GB.  To put this in perspective he explained that in printed form this would form a pile that would stretch to Pluto 10 times over.  The really staggering statistic, however, was that if this data were printed then the stack would grow faster than NASA’s fastest rocket.  I haven’t checked the stats, but a quick back of the envelope calculation suggests he’s in the right order of magnitude.</p>
<p>What does this mean?  Apart from the staggering numbers, it tells us that the problem for organisations isn’t holding large amounts of information – they already do that.  Nor is the problem necessarily how to index that information – increasingly they have defined information standards to do that.  The real problem is its continual growth – very few taxonomies or models properly account for the rapid rate of growth.</p>
<p>MIKE2.0 hosts a new generation of Information Management techniques which are designed to deal less with the data you have now and more with the data that you are likely to gain in the future.   A great place to start is with the <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/SAFE_Architecture" target="_blank">SAFE architecture</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/g4M2ma2zBaQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/07/05/to-pluto-and-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/07/05/to-pluto-and-back/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Using MIKE2.0 to win IM strategy work in tough times</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/BVnH8HEMgRU/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/30/using-mike20-to-win-im-strategy-work-in-tough-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 22:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Information Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s tough out there if you&#8217;re trying to kick off a critical information management program.  Whereas most clients I speak with want to significantly improve their capability in how they manage information, they find it tough to get funding for major programs of work   This is where I believe some real benefits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s tough out there if you&#8217;re trying to kick off a critical information management program.  Whereas most clients I speak with want to significantly improve their capability in how they manage information, they find it tough to get funding for major programs of work   This is where I believe some real benefits come through for MIKE2.0 - you can still get a comprehensive, highly relevant approach more quickly though reuse of the framework:</p>
<p>You can use the approach to drive cost reduction, through a comprehensive approach for:<br />
•	Technology and system consolidation<br />
•	Alignment of common information management programs<br />
•	Operational efficiency through better data quality and efficiency</p>
<p>You can reuse free content and improve delivery quality:<br />
•	A common, open framework that can be reused across all your projects<br />
•	A common, open framework for external providers<br />
•	Free collaboration technology</p>
<p>You can build momentum for your priority business initiatives:<br />
•	Make sure you have a fact-based business case<br />
•	Improve data and analytical capabilities to meet new business demands<br />
•	Prepare for major changes related to merger integration </p>
<p>I find businesses will spend money these days on information management - you just need a strong &#8220;case for change&#8221;.  To read more, check out the <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/XBR">extreme blueprinting and roadmapping</a> approach to building a transformational IM strategy and some recent<a href=" http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/MIKE2.0_Case_Studies"> Case Studies</a>. </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/BVnH8HEMgRU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/30/using-mike20-to-win-im-strategy-work-in-tough-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/30/using-mike20-to-win-im-strategy-work-in-tough-times/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>AIIM Roadshow 2009 UK</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/-K6JMKJDLUU/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/10/aiim-roadshow-2009-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas.rindler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise Content Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[aiim]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ecm]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[moss]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A visit to the AIIM Roadshow 2009 in London, UK, helped me get a quick update on the state of the ECM industry. Doug Miles gave the key note presentation with results from a recent AIIM survey:

Focus for investment in 2009 will be on Document Management, portals, Enterprise 2.0, Electronic Records Management and Search
Document capture, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A visit to the AIIM Roadshow 2009 in London, UK, helped me get a quick update on the state of the ECM industry. Doug Miles gave the key note presentation with results from a recent <a href="http://www.aiim.org" target="_self">AIIM</a> survey:</p>
<ul>
<li>Focus for investment in 2009 will be on Document Management, portals, Enterprise 2.0, Electronic Records Management and Search</li>
<li>Document capture, MFPs, OCR, digital mailroom are falling behind in importance</li>
<li>Software expenditure (i.e. license fees) will be up, services including training (which will harm associations like AIIM) are stagnating</li>
<li>Most organisations achieve the expected return on investment (ROI) with their ECM investment, in particular with hard $ ROI; but interestinly enough, most overachieve their soft $ ROI - This makes ECM look like a pretty low risk investment compared to some of the other IT initiatives.</li>
<li>43% of organisation achieve a payback within 12 month on their document capture and digitisation projects alone!</li>
</ul>
<p>Doug moved on to discuss Microsoft&#8217;s offering for ECM, <a href="http://sharepoint.microsoft.com" target="_blank">Microsoft Office SharePoint Server</a> (MOSS):</p>
<ul>
<li>12% of respondents stated that MOSS is their chosen ECM suite (enterprise wide)</li>
<li>Collaboration is stated as the top reason to implement MOSS</li>
<li>Although Enterprise 2.0 and Search are only 8th and 9th on the priority list, with ~25% of respondents working on that</li>
<li>5% and 22% of respondents stated that MOSS is compatible or works in parallel to other ECM solutions</li>
</ul>
<p>We also got a bit of visionary (wishful?!) thinking:</p>
<ul>
<li>Focus for ECM should be on creating an &#8220;ECM Central&#8221;, a central capability as opposed to single purpose solutions</li>
<li>Drive ECM towards Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) via single sign-on (SSO), open source and open standards</li>
<li>Provide enterprise search for retrieval across all repositories and systems</li>
<li>And consider managing assets &#8220;in place&#8221; as opposed to endless migration efforts from one system to the next</li>
<li>Interestingly enough, 35% of respondents want to migrate to a single system</li>
<li>34% will provide linkage between systems via portals</li>
<li>and only 9% are considering or implementing enterprise search</li>
</ul>
<div>We also heard a bit about Software as a Service (SaasS) and Cloud computing:</div>
<div>
<ul>
<li>20% of respondents plan or use Cloud or SaaS for document management</li>
<li>Top concerns are around security and integration with other systems</li>
</ul>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>Well, who is gonna survive the industry consolidation? IBM, Oracle and Microsoft are battling for the next wave. OpenText remains as the single, independent specialist ECM provider&#8230;</div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/-K6JMKJDLUU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/10/aiim-roadshow-2009-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/10/aiim-roadshow-2009-uk/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Personalizing MIKE2.0</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/Oull7ugfKp4/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/09/personalizing-mike20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[omCollab]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve recently added some new functionality to the MIKE2.0 site that will help our users have a more dynamic and personalized experience.  Go to the home page and you can drag-and-drop portlets on the site to give it a more indivual feel.  This is just the early stages and we&#8217;ll be adding a lot more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve recently added some new functionality to the MIKE2.0 site that will help our users have a more dynamic and personalized experience.  Go to the <a href="http://www.openmethodology.org">home page</a> and you can drag-and-drop portlets on the site to give it a more indivual feel.  This is just the early stages and we&#8217;ll be adding a lot more functionality over the coming weeks.  You can see a bit more about what we&#8217;re building <a href="http://waterloo.openmethodology.org/trac/omcollab/ticket/72">here</a>.</p>
<p>Let us know what you think about the approach!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/Oull7ugfKp4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/09/personalizing-mike20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/09/personalizing-mike20/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Collaboration Analytics</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/xMTa07PkNqw/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/03/collaboration-analytics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas.rindler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[omCollab]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wiki analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How healthy is your collaborative community? Well, measure it! You will have seen that we have introduced more analytics and activity portlets to omCollab, which you can find on the Home tab.
You can also check out the wiki statistics of MIKE2.0 via the following links:

http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics
http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics?action=raw
http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:ContributionScores

Here are also some other resources that might be helpful:


http://wikitracer.com - [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How healthy is your collaborative community? Well, measure it! You will have seen that we have introduced more analytics and activity portlets to omCollab, which you can find on the <strong><a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org" target="_blank">Home</a></strong><a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org" target="_blank"> </a>tab.</p>
<p>You can also check out the wiki statistics of MIKE2.0 via the following links:</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics?action=raw">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:Statistics?action=raw</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:ContributionScores">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:ContributionScores</a></li>
</ol>
<div>Here are also some other resources that might be helpful:</div>
<div>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://wikitracer.com" target="_blank">http://wikitracer.com</a> - an open source research project to analyse wiki contributions</li>
<li><a href="http://www.socialtext.net/open/index.cgi?wiki_analytics">http://www.socialtext.net/open/index.cgi?wiki_analytics</a> - good collection of ideas about wiki analytics</li>
</ol>
<div>And if you want to know about the mother of all wikis, check this out:</div>
<div><a href="http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm">http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/Sitemap.htm</a></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/xMTa07PkNqw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/03/collaboration-analytics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/06/03/collaboration-analytics/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Information Development concepts becoming more mainstream</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/94pyt_KV-VU/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/05/27/information-development-concepts-becoming-more-mainstream/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Information Development]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Information Value]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[acaemia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[information theory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[quants]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For an interesting point of view on how how quantitative social science is becoming more making mainstream, check out Steve Miller&#8217;s great article: Hopefully we&#8217;ll see more of these methods developed in an open and collaborative fashion through frameworks like MIKE2.0.   Something we haven&#8217;t done well enough is engage the academic community becoming part of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an interesting point of view on how how quantitative social science is becoming more making mainstream, check out <a href="http://www.information-management.com/blogs/quantitative_social_science_business_intelligence_bi-10015452-1.html">Steve Miller&#8217;s great article</a>: Hopefully we&#8217;ll see more of these methods developed in an open and collaborative fashion through frameworks like MIKE2.0.   Something we haven&#8217;t done well enough is engage the academic community becoming part of the collaborative community?</p>
<p>Seen any great published work on this space?  Help add it to MIKE2.0 bookmarks ..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.information-management.com/blogs/quantitative_social_science_business_intelligence_bi-10015452-1.html"><br />
</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/94pyt_KV-VU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/05/27/information-development-concepts-becoming-more-mainstream/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/05/27/information-development-concepts-becoming-more-mainstream/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Build your MIKE2.0 Social Network</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/h68qOoNnBj8/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/04/18/build-your-mike20-social-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MIKE2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[omCollab]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The social profile component has been enhanced to store data in a structured fashion to link to information management capabilities.
You can now tag your experience and the experience of others and look at the skills within our community.
Thanks to (Xiping) Kevin - who did a fantastic job in extening our social networking capability!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The social profile component has been enhanced to store data in a structured fashion to link to information management capabilities.</p>
<p>You can now <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:UpdateProfile?section=expertise">tag your experience</a> and the <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:UpdateProfile?section=community_expertise">experience of others</a> and look at the <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/Special:UpdateProfile?section=community_expertise">skills within our community</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/w/index.php/User:Xiping.wang">(Xiping) Kevin</a> - who did a fantastic job in extening our social networking capability!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/h68qOoNnBj8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/04/18/build-your-mike20-social-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/04/18/build-your-mike20-social-network/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Driving Digital Growth</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/4HS_DcIfJM4/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/14/driving-digital-growth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andreas.rindler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Web Content Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Digital Growth]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtually every company is thinking about how to drive digital growth, getting more and more visitors and maybe even establishing something like an online community driven by forums and social networking type functionality. VCs still believe that the number one driver for valuation of a digital business is number of visitors. So how to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virtually every company is thinking about how to drive digital growth, getting more and more visitors and maybe even establishing something like an online community driven by forums and social networking type functionality. VCs still believe that the number one driver for valuation of a digital business is number of visitors. So how to do you really drive digital growth? Here are my top lessons learned from projects in the media and comms industry:</p>
<p>1. Make sure you have <strong>SEO compliant coding</strong> of the website<br />
2. Employ <strong>SEO and online marketing specialists </strong>to drive traffic<br />
3. Use site <strong>visitor analytics </strong>to understand their behaviour on the site and to adjust your content and navigation accordingly<br />
4. Perform a <strong>connected customer analysis </strong>to understand what is hot in the market, what are people talking about etc. to adjust your content accordingly<br />
5. Execute on focused <strong>3rd party deals </strong>to drive traffic and brand awareness with specific relevance to your site<br />
6. Create <strong>sticky applications </strong>like tools and games to increase hits per user, visit length but also get additional users by allowing them to share the tool with others<br />
7. Drive <strong>cross sales </strong>between your offline business and digital, eg with deals or links related to your offline products that drive traffic to your website<br />
8. Configure a <strong>site search engine </strong>with solid categorisation and predictive functionality to drive traffic through search visits<br />
9. Write <strong>good and dynamic content </strong>to drive repeat traffic<br />
10. Use <strong>personalisation </strong>features to engage users with &#8216;their&#8217; site<br />
11. Drive organic SEO by <strong>cross posting </strong>on other sites that have high page rank value<br />
12. Pay <strong>bloggers or review sites </strong>to write about your site or, even better, specific contenton your site<br />
13. Use of <strong>rich media and multiple channels </strong>(e.g. mobile access) to drive enhanced customer experience and traffic</p>
<p>Just my two cents&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/4HS_DcIfJM4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/14/driving-digital-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/14/driving-digital-growth/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>MIKE2.0 - How to Help</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/VfNjvzT0P_0/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/03/mike20-how-to-help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[MIKE2.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the questions we&#8217;ve been getting lately with MIKE2.0 is &#8230; how do I help?   Its great to hear this as we could certainly use it!
We&#8217;ve listed some overall ways here and in this context, the areas where we could really use help include:

Best practices information security
Best practices in business intelligence
Best practices in search
Best [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the questions we&#8217;ve been getting lately with MIKE2.0 is &#8230; <em>how do I help</em>?   Its great to hear this as we could certainly use it!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve listed some overall ways <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/MIKE2:Ways_to_Contribute">here</a> and in this context, the areas where we could really use help include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Best practices information security</li>
<li>Best practices in business intelligence</li>
<li>Best practices in search</li>
<li>Best practices in content management</li>
<li>Success stories from a business perspective using IM</li>
<li>Requirements templates, ROI models and product-specific best practices</li>
</ul>
<p>These could be architecture patterns, lessons learned or product reviews.</p>
<p>The easiest way to contribute, however, is to <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/bookmarks/">add bookmark</a>s or engage in <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/forum/">forum discussions</a>.  Bookmarks are a great way to add content from others sites and link it into the MIKE2.0 framework.</p>
<p>And of course we could always use <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/01/want-to-help-make-omcollab-better/">development help with omCollab.</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ll work on making this list more clear - any suggestions on how to do this best are welcome!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/VfNjvzT0P_0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/03/mike20-how-to-help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/03/mike20-how-to-help/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to help make omCollab better?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~3/yLuJvRyLRJY/</link>
		<comments>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/01/want-to-help-make-omcollab-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean.mcclowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Site Announcements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[omCollab]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[site administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve been working omCollab, the technology that supports MIKE2.0, for quite a while.  The whole approach is free and open source. You can get the code from here: http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/OmCollab
Our goal is to not only to build a better platform for MIKE2.0.  Its to provide an integrated product that meets the requirements for enterprise collaboration and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been working omCollab, the technology that supports MIKE2.0, for quite a while.  The whole approach is free and open source. You can get the code from here: <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/OmCollab">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/OmCollab</a></p>
<p>Our goal is to not only to build a better platform for MIKE2.0.  Its to provide an integrated product that meets the requirements for enterprise collaboration and will support our key initiative at <a href="http://www.openmethodology.org/" target="_blank">www.openmethodology.org</a> and the concept of an <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/MIKE2:Integrated_Content_Repository">integrated framework for information developmen</a>t.</p>
<p>A couple questions for this group:</p>
<p>1. Do you think its a good idea?</p>
<p>2. Do you have any recommendations on open source assets we might want to bundle into omCollab?</p>
<p>3. Does anyone want to help?</p>
<p>What to find out more?</p>
<ul>
<li>The planned roadmap is here: <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/OmCollab_roadmap " target="_blank">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/wiki/OmCollab_roadmap </a></li>
<li>You can add bugs/feature requests here:<a href="http://waterloo.openmethodology.org/trac/omcollab/" target="_blank">http://waterloo.openmethodology.org/trac/omcollab/</a></li>
<li>Join our forum discussion here: <a href="http://mike2.openmethodology.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=4">http://mike2.openmethodology.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=4</a></li>
</ul>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MIKE20InformationDevelopment/~4/yLuJvRyLRJY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/01/want-to-help-make-omcollab-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://mike2.openmethodology.org/blogs/information-development/2009/02/01/want-to-help-make-omcollab-better/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
