<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com</link>
	<description>The Economic Engine of Political Change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2023 18:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.25</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Time Out</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/time-out/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Nov 2019 03:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>We have gone dormant for the time being. Please enjoy the archives. We&#8217;ll be back when we get our next project going.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/time-out/">Time Out</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have gone dormant for the time being. Please enjoy the archives. We&#8217;ll be back when we get our next project going.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/time-out/">Time Out</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading recommendations on luxury goods markets</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/reading-recommendations-on-luxury-goods-markets/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2019 13:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition in Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A RL and FB friend writes: &#8220;A friend is looking for books/articles on markets for luxury goods. Can anyone suggest some reading? I know you were working on IP and fashion. Have you published that work? Might it be appropriate?&#8221;   My post on his FB thread: There&#8217;s an economics literature on status goods that your friend can investigate. Some of it is pure theory of consumer behavior. Some of it involves counterfeiting and by implication...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/reading-recommendations-on-luxury-goods-markets/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/reading-recommendations-on-luxury-goods-markets/">Reading recommendations on luxury goods markets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="853ka-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="853ka-0-0">A RL and FB friend writes: &#8220;A friend is looking for books/articles on markets for luxury goods. Can anyone suggest some reading? I know you were working on IP and fashion. Have you published that work? Might it be appropriate?&#8221;</div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="fcc75-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="fcc75-0-0"><span data-offset-key="fcc75-0-0"> </span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0"><span data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0">My post on his FB thread:</span></div>
<div data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0"></div>
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0"><span data-offset-key="5m9gs-0-0">There&#8217;s an economics literature on status goods that your friend can investigate. Some of it is pure theory of consumer behavior. Some of it involves counterfeiting and by implication IP policy. In certain strainds of this stuff we get nice but admittedly arcane discussions about price as indicator of quality, and whether lux goods are microeconomic anomalies because people seem to be willing to have greater demand at higher price. A favorite piece on status is Roger Congleton&#8217;s &#8220;Efficient Status Seeking&#8221; in JEBO 1989.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="65jn-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="65jn-0-0"><span data-offset-key="65jn-0-0"> </span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="67eiu-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="67eiu-0-0"><span data-offset-key="67eiu-0-0">The Deluxe book recommended on this thread is a journalistic piece from a high-culture perspective. It&#8217;s an attempt to cut against the inevitable and insurmountable trend of &#8220;democratized&#8221; fashion. In my opinion, it&#8217;s good story telling, but fails as a sound argument. It fails because it depends too much on the normative point of view that design goods ought to be elite in consumption and artisanal in production. Anything else is &#8212; pshaw! There&#8217;s nothing wrong with that point of view, for the precise reason that it can&#8217;t be shown to be wrong. Heavy on opinion, light on argument. Published in something like &#8217;07, it&#8217;s also very late in the game. Avoid.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="3ghma-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="3ghma-0-0"><span data-offset-key="3ghma-0-0"> </span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="ecg57-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="ecg57-0-0"><span data-offset-key="ecg57-0-0">A better piece, in my view, is the 1920&#8217;s (ish?) book Fashion is Spinach, by an author whose name escapes me right now. It&#8217;s by an American fashion designer who goes to Paris with tons of talent, and finds herself in the lucrative &#8220;knockoff&#8221; business. It&#8217;s a tell all and highly realistic tale. I like it because it shows, among many other cool things, to today&#8217;s readers that copying in design goods, especially fashion, is nothing new. Copying in fashion has been around at least as long as haute couture has. The Raustiala and Sprigmen recommendation, also on this thread, is masterful in demonstrating that copying in design goods (again, especially fashion) is actually critical to the success of the industry. See their follow-up book, The Knockoff Economy, for much more. Also better than Deluxe is Teri Agins&#8217;s 1990s-ish book, The End of Fashion. She&#8217;s a WSJ writer and takes a pretty sober approach to the trend of democratized and commercialized fashion.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="1lnf7-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="1lnf7-0-0"><span data-offset-key="1lnf7-0-0"> </span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="1vc0n-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="1vc0n-0-0"><span data-offset-key="1vc0n-0-0"><img class="alignleft" src="https://fee.org/media/24471/shutterstock_122631682.jpg?anchor=center&amp;mode=crop&amp;width=1920&amp;rnd=131484825120000000" width="548" height="365" />More broadly, you can&#8217;t go wrong with </span><span class="_247o" spellcheck="false" data-offset-key="1vc0n-1-0"><span data-offset-key="1vc0n-1-0">Tyler Cowen</span></span><span data-offset-key="1vc0n-2-0">&#8216;s In Praise of Commercial Culture, which tackles the high-low culture divide in an early chapter, and which shows how markets generate tons of creative output. It&#8217;s his masterpiece, in my opinion (as one of his Ph.D. students, maybe that opinion counts?). Also of course, read everything by </span><span class="_247o" spellcheck="false" data-offset-key="1vc0n-3-0"><span data-offset-key="1vc0n-3-0">Virginia Postrel</span></span><span data-offset-key="1vc0n-4-0">, backwards from The Power of Glamour, to The Substance of Style, to The Future and its Enemies. She has a book on textiles coming out at some point, too.</span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="dnso3-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="dnso3-0-0"><span data-offset-key="dnso3-0-0"> </span></div>
</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="4b1u5" data-offset-key="54d0l-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="54d0l-0-0"><span data-offset-key="54d0l-0-0">If your friend is truly desperate, they can take in my essay on IP and copying in fashion here: &#8220;<a href="https://fee.org/articles/fashion-design-and-copyright/">Fashion Design and Copyright</a>,&#8221; FEE Online, November 2010.</span></div>
</div>
<div data-offset-key="54d0l-0-0"></div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/reading-recommendations-on-luxury-goods-markets/">Reading recommendations on luxury goods markets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Asheville: Embrace Your Growing Economy</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/dear-asheville-embrace-your-growing-economy/</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the past three years I have focused heavily on launching and directing a new center at my university. The downside has been less scholarly output. The upside has been new opportunities to analyze and comment on the regional economy in Western North Carolina (WNC). As a case in point, take a look at the new issue of Capital at Play, an impressive new magazine that focuses on entrepreneurs and economics in greater Asheville and...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/dear-asheville-embrace-your-growing-economy/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/dear-asheville-embrace-your-growing-economy/">Dear Asheville: Embrace Your Growing Economy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past three years I have focused heavily on launching and directing a new center at my university. The downside has been less scholarly output. The upside has been new opportunities to analyze and comment on the regional economy in Western North Carolina (WNC). As a case in point, take a look at the new issue of Capital at Play, an impressive new magazine that focuses on entrepreneurs and economics in greater Asheville and WNC.</p>
<p>This issue&#8217;s lead story is a profile of manufacturing in WNC. While the region enjoys a stellar reputation as a tourist destination and maker of craft and artisanal goods (anyone care for a tasty beverage?), lots of folks will be surprised to learn how heavily the region depends on manufacturing. This surprise comes from everyone knowing that the days of big textile and big furniture are long gone. Is anything &#8220;being made in&#8221; WNC anymore?</p>
<p>In a word, heck yeah. In fact, manufacturing output is still the leading sector in the Western counties ($5.7 billion, or 21.0% of total WNC output), as it is statewide ($103 billion, or 19.8% of state output). And after almost all sectors declined badly during the Great Recession, manufacturing has been the fastest growing sector in WNC over the last decade, now matching pre-Great Recession levels in <span class="currentHitHighlight"><span class="currentHitHighlight">Buncombe County (Asheville). Taking all 13 Western counties together, m</span></span>anufacturing <span id="0.7234063869998257" class="highlight">growth</span> has been much faster (39% since Great Recession) than it has been statewide (22.7% over the last decade). Total compensation to manufacturing workers has increased 21% over than same period. This is happening as the number of jobs in manufacturing has declined. So, while the WNC manufacturing economy is small (about 5%) compared to the rest of the state, it&#8217;s been growing faster than in the rest of the state and is the biggest part of the WNC economy.</p>
<p>Again, it is perhaps easy to overlook how important manufacturing is to the WNC economy. Headlines focus on the decline of manufacturing jobs and abandoned union buildings. This is understandable. But equally importantly, although perhaps not as newsworthy, is the reality that WNC manufacturers have been producing a lot more value in recent years, and they&#8217;ve been doing so with fewer workers.</p>
<p>Along with this tale comes other realities. The fact is, manufacturing in WNC is becoming more globally competitive, environmentally cleaner, more technology-driven, and more knowledge-based. Asheville denizens, who are prone to bicker about outsiders and anything large in scale, should embrace our growing economy. We should embrace our role as an increasingly globally-connected economy. And we should embrace our role as the economic hub for the greater WNC region. Asheville sits at the cross of two important interstate highways, and as the entry point from lower elevations to the south and east, it is the main connector between the Charlotte-Atlanta corridor and populations to the north and west of the Southern Appalachians. Tourism and craft? Heck yeah. But manufacturing and trade, heck yeah too.</p>
<p>A closing thought. It&#8217;s tempting to think that manufacturing jobs simply go where labor costs are the lowest. Ross Perot nearly won the U.S. presidency on this misconception (remember his &#8220;giant sucking sound&#8221;?), Donald Trump actually did (along with other peddled misconceptions), and politicians of all stripes continue wielding it to rattle the public&#8217;s cautionary stance toward foreign trade. But manufacturing jobs are increasingly high-skilled jobs, and companies want to locate near high-skilled work forces. They&#8217;re also willing to match those high skills with high pay. So rather than close ourselves off in xenophobic fret, we should embrace the challenge of remaining economically competitive. This has been the trend in WNC, as elsewhere. It is not without its downsides. But it has many, many upsides that deserve better than the neglect of the public&#8217;s cautionary attention.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/dear-asheville-embrace-your-growing-economy/">Dear Asheville: Embrace Your Growing Economy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Krugman, Wiliam Baumol, Bob Tollison, and the economics of economics</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/1747-2/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 15:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Academic Scribblers in Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Professional Incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago Paul Krugman <a href="https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/our-blogs-ourselves/">argued</a> that the economics blogosphere had become the main forum for debate and discussion of economics. It&#8217;s the instant blogs, he said, not the circuitous peer-reviewed journals, where the action is. Actually, Krugman continued, the academic journals &#8220;ceased being a means of communication a long time ago &#8211; more than 20 years ago for sure.&#8221; Instead, scholars began circulating papers in advance of publication, and serious papers started gaining discussion...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/1747-2/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/1747-2/">Paul Krugman, Wiliam Baumol, Bob Tollison, and the economics of economics</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="87jk" data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0"><span data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">A few years ago Paul Krugman <a href="https://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/our-blogs-ourselves/">argued</a> that the economics blogosphere had become the main forum for debate and discussion of economics. It&#8217;s the instant blogs, he said, not the circuitous peer-reviewed journals, where the action is. Actually, Krugman continued, the academic journals &#8220;ceased being a means of communication a long time ago &#8211; more than 20 years ago for sure.&#8221; Instead, scholars began circulating papers in advance of publication, and serious papers started gaining discussion and citations in other research long before coming into peer-reviewed print.</span></div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0"></div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0"></div>
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">Notice the diffuse academic entrepreneurship that implicitly supports Krugman&#8217;s point. As Wayne and I write in Chapter 3 of <em>Madmen</em>:</div>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">In the marketplace of economic ideas, scholars are in the <em>business</em> of crafting arguments, techniques, theorems, policy recommendations, and so forth, all in the hope of exchanging their craft for the currency of readership, praise, influence, and ultimately some prominent place in the body of economic scholarship. Economists act like idea entrepreneurs&#8230;</div>
</blockquote>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">If the journals are too slow, entrepreneurial scholars will seek out cost-effective ways to speed things up. Before email, circulating pre-prints meant stuffing a bunch of envelopes, mail merging a bunch of cover letters, and paying lots of postage. But as everyone started using email (roughly &#8220;more than 20 years ago&#8221;), the cost of circulating pre-prints fell. And it fell a lot. The technology allowed entrepreneurial scholars to speed up pre-publication communications relative to peer-reviewed journals. So if Krugman is right that most of the action left the journals about a generation ago, it&#8217;s because of this combination of idea entrepreneurship and new communication technology.</div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0"></div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="87jk" data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0"><span data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0">Haven&#8217;t the journals tried to keep pace? My sense is that they&#8217;ve tried very hard, but have made only modest progress. One important and helpful change has been the near total abandonment of print. The journals are not unique in this trend, which has captured the publishing world, but unlike books and magazines it seems like journals have gone almost all-in with digital. Also, most publishers now make available papers that have been accepted but not yet &#8220;published&#8221; in a numbered volume or issue. A second important change has been the digitization of submissions, with software such as <a href="https://www.ariessys.com/software/editorial-manager/">Editorial Manager</a>. These tools do more than speed up submissions, they also measure how long peer-reviewers take to return their reports and how often they decline requests to review. Naturally, peer reviewers care about their reputations at journals; therefore, knowing that editors have at hand referees&#8217; decline rates and return times is an incentive for those referees to work, and work faster. Still, it seems that neither digital distribution nor digital submission has been a game changer for the speed of peer-reviewed outlets. They&#8217;re still slow.</span></div>
<div data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0"></div>
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0"><span data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0">Enter the academic entrepreneurs at <a href="https://ssrn.com/en/">SSRN</a>, founded by two financial economists in 1994 (&#8220;more than 20 years ago&#8221;) as Social Science Research Network. The goal was to facilitate rapid dissemination of scholarly communications. Essentially an academic startup, SSRN is now the world&#8217;s largest repository of open-access research, and a couple of years ago it was bought out by Elsevier, one of the largest publishers of academic journals. Its tagline is &#8220;Tomorrow&#8217;s Research Today&#8221;. Well, today I received an email from SSRN announcing their new initiative called <a href="https://www.ssrn.com/en/index.cfm/first-look/">First Look</a>. </span></div>
</div>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div data-offset-key="a0o40-0-0">First Look is a place where journals and other research experts identify content of interest prior to publication. It can include a wide range of early stage content types including working papers, proceedings, preprints, accepted papers, and papers under consideration. First Look is a partnership between SSRN and some of the world’s most influential journals to provide rapid, early and open access to evolving scholarly research.</div>
</blockquote>
<div data-offset-key="a0o40-0-0">Okay. So the journals might still be slow, but they&#8217;re also still trying to speed things up. Time will tell. For now, a separate but related observation: I&#8217;m struck by the contrast between the large-scale, concentrated innovation behind First Look, against the small-scale, diffuse innovation behind blogs and email.  The late William Baumol&#8217;s work on &#8220;routinized&#8221; entrepreneurship explains this well. He draws attention to the prevalence and importance of large-scale innovation, such as R&amp;D in large corporations. Sometimes called the &#8220;<a href="https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/55986">David-Goliath symbiosis</a>&#8220;, Baumol&#8217;s theory of innovation combines the startup entrepreneur with the corporate entrepreneur &#8212; the breakthrough innovator with the incremental innovator. It&#8217;s a rich theory, developed over much of the second half of his career. Overall Baumol argues that people focus too much on small-scale innovation to the neglect of large-scale innovation, when the latter often <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Free-Market-Innovation-Machine-Analyzing-Capitalism/dp/069111630X">contributes more to economic growth</a> than does the former. I think this helps understand the economics trade, and all those idea entrepreneurs out there, large and small. It also illustrates the point that economics applies to ideas as much as it does to goods &amp; services, a point that implicitly supports both <em>Madmen</em> and this blog. As the late great Bob Tollison <a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/excerpt-about-bob-tollison-1942-2016/">wrote in his SEA presidential address</a>, &#8220;An economist cannot take a measure of the world without obeying its postulates.&#8221; I think this is so true.</div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0"></div>
<div data-offset-key="i3mv-0-0">By the way, in the same piece that hooks this post, Krugman also made a normative point about the ascension of blogs. He said it was a good thing that the economics blogosphere had become the main forum for debate and discussion. Using blogs, economists short-circuited the often dysfunctional &#8220;gatekeeper&#8221; role of peer-review, and this opened debate to &#8220;any old Joe&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t think Krugman was as right about the democratizing effect of blogs as he was about the slowness of journals. While the blogosphere certainly <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/eej.2009.46">flourished</a> in the early 2000&#8217;s, it has become more concentrated since 2008. Sure, any old Joe (say, this one!) can still post any old entry. But if peer-review had become a gatekeeper to journal entry decades ago, today&#8217;s clicks and pingbacks can be elusive to all but the &#8220;top&#8221; bloggers.</div>
<div class="" data-block="true" data-editor="87jk" data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" data-offset-key="1oksv-0-0"></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/1747-2/">Paul Krugman, Wiliam Baumol, Bob Tollison, and the economics of economics</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What they are saying about Madmen!</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/review/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2018 00:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyler Tarbet]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About the Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>“Ideas matter. Madmen, with its engaging stories, is perfect for anyone interested in public policy, or how our world could be a better place. Read it, and assign it to your students.” — Tyler Cowen, George Mason University, blogger at Marginal Revolution, and author of Discover Your Inner Economist “There’s no shortage of writing about bad government policies, but Leighton and López go several steps deeper, by exploring the incentives that foster bad policies, the...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/review/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/review/">What they are saying about Madmen!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Ideas matter. Madmen, with its engaging stories, is perfect for anyone interested in public policy, or how our world could be a better place. Read it, and assign it to your students.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Tyler Cowen, George Mason University, blogger at Marginal Revolution, and author of Discover Your Inner Economist</strong></em></p>
<p>“There’s no shortage of writing about bad government policies, but Leighton and López go several steps deeper, by exploring the incentives that foster bad policies, the institutions that foster bad incentives, the ideas that foster bad institutions, and the social processes that foster the spread of bad ideas. Better yet, they offer wise prescriptions for change and colorful stories to illustrate their wisdom. This is a book that manages all at once to be sage, important, and great fun to read. I highly recommend it.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Steven E. Landsburg, Professor of Economics, University of Rochester and author of The Armchair Economist</strong></em></p>
<p>“Come along with Leighton and López as they speed date significant economic and philosophical influencers and chart the triumph of markets. As an erstwhile political practitioner in radical market reforming mode, I was relieved to find that I could dodge the moniker of ‘madman’ and classify myself as a ‘political entrepreneur.’ Racy and relevant, this book is a call to reforming arms.”</p>
<p><strong><em>— Honourable Ruth Richardson, former Minister of Finance, New Zealand</em></strong></p>
<p>“This book is an inspiring reminder that great thinking matters. It’s a delightful, accessible, and thought-provoking book for anyone interested in big ideas at the intersection of economics and politics.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Charles Wheelan, University of Chicago and author of Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science</strong></em></p>
<p>“Leighton and López have written a captivating book that explains the process of social change, from ideas to outcomes. Their theoretical framework—centered on the figure of the ‘political entrepreneur’—is illuminating and original. It will spark productive conversations among those who are interested in social change and the wealth of nations.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Giancarlo Ibarguen, Entrepreneur and President of Universidad Francisco Marroquín</strong></em></p>
<p>“Madmen makes clear there are several necessary conditions for a political shift to take place. We tend to think of change as resulting from a single hero or villain, but the story is more complex. The tales in this book show what it takes to effect change, while weaving a yarn that is entertaining and memorable.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Michael C. Munger, Duke University and author of Analyzing Policy</strong></em></p>
<p>“Madmen is a rare treat—and a rare feat. Seldom does a work combine the rigors of academic inquiry with the delights of a successful storytelling enterprise. The principles of “political change,” as it turns out, can explain human behavior in the body politic, in sports, in decisions of daily life, in financial markets, and naturally in the complex field of structural reform. This book is required reading for people focusing on the dynamics of political transformation; it is also a splendid read in itself.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— Dr. Roberto Salinas León, President, Mexico Business Forum</strong></em></p>
<p>“Leighton and López supply intellectually sound arguments, grounded in public choice and Austrian economics, to explain why democratic governments often fail to produce policies that are consistent with the public’s interest. Most impressive are the authors’ evident grasp of—and ability to synthesize—complex arguments about the properties of ‘good government.”</p>
<p><em><strong>— William F. Shughart II, Utah State University and co-author of Policy Challenges and Political Responses</strong></em></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/review/">What they are saying about Madmen!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teaching with Humor</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/teaching-with-humor/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Teaching Corner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/groucho2.jpg"></a> Today is the first day of class at WCU. I&#8217;m not teaching this semester, and I know that I&#8217;ll miss it in some ways even though I will make good use of the time off. Recently I was asked to submit a file for the Liberal Studies Teaching Award. The LS program is the core of WCU&#8217;s curriculum. There is a list of classes across most of the disciplines on campus (although it&#8217;s heavy on...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/teaching-with-humor/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/teaching-with-humor/">Teaching with Humor</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="color: #1d2129;"><a href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/groucho2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1681" src="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/groucho2-208x300.jpg" alt="groucho2" width="208" height="300" srcset="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/groucho2-208x300.jpg 208w, https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/groucho2.jpg 235w" sizes="(max-width: 208px) 100vw, 208px" /></a>Today is the first day of class at WCU. I&#8217;m not teaching this semester, and I know that I&#8217;ll miss it in some ways even though I will make good use of the time off.</p>
<p style="color: #1d2129;">Recently I was asked to submit a file for the Liberal Studies Teaching Award. The LS program is the core of WCU&#8217;s curriculum. There is a list of classes across most of the disciplines on campus (although it&#8217;s heavy on humanities). And there&#8217;s a faculty committee separate from the regular curriculum committees that <span class="text_exposed_show">oversees the program. I teach two LS courses a semester, including my upper-level Ethics of Capitalism class.</span></p>
<div class="text_exposed_show" style="color: #1d2129;">
<p>The application for the LS teaching award is intricate (max 50 pages!). Among its many sections, one asks for an &#8220;Explanation of best practices for teaching LS courses&#8221;. I dutifully wrote a couple of pages, with sub-headings like &#8220;Structured Assignments&#8221; and &#8220;Balance of Material&#8221; and &#8220;Experiential Learning&#8221;. But honestly, even though the process of writing the application gave me some genuine opportunities to reflect on my teaching in ways that I might not otherwise, I couldn&#8217;t shake the feeling that I was writing what they wanted to hear. So I kept editing and re-writing, making sure I could stand by it all. At the end of the section, I added this as my final &#8220;best practice&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Humor: On the wall in my campus office hangs a framed black-and-white photo of Groucho Marx, grinning with a cigar in his mouth and an upside down derby on his head. This is a reminder not to take myself (or economics) too seriously. While I may not be the funniest professor on campus, I do try to mix things up in class. I show funny video clips that help unpack dense material. I crack corny jokes and show pictures of my kids goofing off. I even perform tricks, like juggling tennis balls, to illustrate certain concepts (Adam Smith in his 1776 classic The Wealth of Nations talks about an “elaborate juggling trick”). I use humor partly for my own sanity, but students seem to appreciate it as well. God help us—or at least the ghost of Groucho Marx—if we cannot have fun while learning in the LS Program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to all my friends and colleagues at WCU, and all my students, hoping that you have an awesome semester. Let&#8217;s get the job done. And let&#8217;s keep it real with some humor along the way.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/teaching-with-humor/">Teaching with Humor</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill McGowan, MCI’s Political Entrepreneur</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/bill-mcgowan-mcis-political-entrepreneur/</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Diamond]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>AT&#38;T was one of the most powerful and long-lived monopolies in U.S. history. Tim Wu has documented in The Master Switch how AT&#38;T suppressed innovations, big and small, even some that were generated within AT&#38;T’s own Bell Labs. The advocates of AT&#38;T were articulate and well-connected politically. AT&#38;T was a paradigm case of the seeming invulnerability of crony capitalism. How entrepreneurial capitalism eventually, and partially, won against crony capitalism is of interest, not just for...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/bill-mcgowan-mcis-political-entrepreneur/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/bill-mcgowan-mcis-political-entrepreneur/">Bill McGowan, MCI’s Political Entrepreneur</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T was one of the most powerful and long-lived monopolies in U.S. history. Tim Wu has documented in The Master Switch how AT&amp;T suppressed innovations, big and small, even some that were generated within AT&amp;T’s own Bell Labs. The advocates of AT&amp;T were articulate and well-connected politically. AT&amp;T was a paradigm case of the seeming invulnerability of crony capitalism. How entrepreneurial capitalism eventually, and partially, won against crony capitalism is of interest, not just for historical reasons, but more importantly because similar battles still need to be fought. As we have learned from Leighton and López’s Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers, the key agents in these battles, are the political entrepreneurs.</p>
<p>The first major startup to successfully compete against AT&amp;T was MCI. The story was usefully told in 1986 by Larry Kahaner in his On the Line: The Men of MCI Who Took On AT&amp;T, Risked Everything and Won! MCI was founded by Jack Goeken, who arguably was more inventor/engineer, than he was entrepreneur. Beyond the very earliest days, the dominant agent in the growth of MCI was Bill McGowan, some of whose successes show him to have been an able political entrepreneur.</p>
<p>Goeken had founded MCI using microwave relays to send voice messages between Chicago and St. Louis. Rather than simply grow the MCI that Goeken had founded, which would have made sense in terms of economies of scale, McGowan set up several separate little local MCIs, each financed by local investors (Kahaner 1986, p. 58). The FCC was committed to localism in awarding radio and TV licenses, and McGowan, as political entrepreneur, saw this decentralized structure as a way to win approval from the FCC.</p>
<p>When McGowan eventually sought to extend MCI’s service to Europe, he faced the formidable Conference of European Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT) whose 34 nations had jointly agreed that none of them would strike a deal with independent voice carriers (Kahaner 1986, pp. 218-219). McGowan’s most effective point man in the effort was Seth Blumenfeld, who realized that the nations of CEPT did not trust each other, and who sought the weakest link that might be convinced to ignore the CEPT agreement. He eventually focused on Belgium, one of the smaller nations in CEPT, that had less in common with the other nations, and that had a reputation for decisions based on good economics, rather than bad crony relationships. MCI offered Belgium modest payments per minute for communications routed to Europe through Belgium. Belgium agreed.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/bill-mcgowan-mcis-political-entrepreneur/">Bill McGowan, MCI’s Political Entrepreneur</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behavioral Political Economy</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/behavioral-political-economy/</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics Discipline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Richard Thaler is the 2017 Nobel laureate in economics for his work in behavioral economics. This comes 15 years after the prize was awarded jointly to Daniel Kahneman for pioneering economic psychology and Vernon Smith for pioneering experimental economics. As the discussion unfolds, we should remember that &#8220;people are rational&#8221; is a starting point &#8212; a simplifying assumption for building models of human interaction. It is not a description of human interaction. So when lab...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/behavioral-political-economy/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/behavioral-political-economy/">Behavioral Political Economy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #1d2129;">Richard Thaler is the 2017 Nobel laureate in economics for his work in behavioral economics. This comes 15 years after the prize was awarded jointly to Daniel Kahneman for pioneering economic psychology and Vernon Smith for pioneering experimental economics. As the discussion unfolds, we should remember that &#8220;people are rational&#8221; is a starting point &#8212; a simplifying assumption for building models of human interaction. It is not a description of human interaction. So when lab and field experiments show evidence of people acting irrationally, this is not an indictment of economics but instead it is learning about economic models. Likewise, people acting irrationally is not an invitation for policymakers to correct people&#8217;s choices. After all, policymakers are people too, so perhaps they don&#8217;t act rationally either.</span></p>
<p>Mario Rizzo draws on his decade-plus of work with Glen Whitman to <a href="https://thinkmarkets.wordpress.com/2017/10/09/richard-thalers-nobel-prize/" target="_blank">deliver this same point</a> with greater subtlety.</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="color: #1d2129;">It is one thing to construct clever experiments in which people do “odd” (unexpected by the standard paradigm) things. It is another to show that they engage in behavior in the real world that is ecologically inappropriate or that leads to self-defeating behavior. “Odd” behavior should be viewed as an invitation to probe more deeply rather than to condemn. Explanation is hard; evaluation can be easy and cheap.</p>
<p style="color: #1d2129;">Even among economists, there is much dissent. Look at the work o<span class="text_exposed_show">f Vernon Smith, another Nobel laureate in economics, whose experimental economics has pushed us into a recognition that the errors or imperfections of individual decisionmaking need not result is poor outcomes — if the institutional structure is good. Smith has carried on the tradition of the Scottish Enlightenment which emphasized time and again the compatibility of imperfect men and outcomes that embody far more “intelligence” than any of them have as individuals.</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Niclas Beggren complements this in his systematic survey of the literature, &#8220;<a href="https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1846184" target="_blank">Time for Behavioral Political Economy?</a>&#8221; (2012 Review of Austrian Economics):</p>
<div class="abstract-text" style="color: #505050;">
<blockquote><p>Abstract: This study analyzes leading research in behavioral economics to see whether it contains advocacy of paternalism and whether it addresses the potential cognitive limitations and biases of the policymakers who are going to implement paternalist policies. The findings reveal that 20.7% of the studied articles in behavioral economics propose paternalist policy action and that 95.5% of these do not contain any analysis of the cognitive ability of policymakers. This suggests that behavioral political economy, in which the analytical tools of behavioral economics are applied to political decision-makers as well, would offer a useful extension of the research program.</p></blockquote>
<p>Also see Glen Whitman anchoring this <a href="https://www.cato-unbound.org/2010/04/05/glen-whitman/rise-new-paternalism" target="_blank">2010 discussion in Cato Unbound</a>.</p>
</div>
<p>There is so much more to Thaler&#8217;s work than the set of nudge policy implications. The inimitable Alex Tabbarok [<a href="http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2017/10/richard-thaler-wins-nobel.html" target="_blank">here</a>] and Tyler Cowen [<a href="http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2017/10/nobel-prize-awarded-richard-thaler.html" target="_blank">here</a>] provide breadth and depth of introduction.</p>
<p>My own contribution to this areas of work tests for one particular behavioral &#8220;anomaly&#8221;, endowment effects, in the context of the most common public goods experiment environment, namely the voluntary contribution mechanism. <a href="https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpex/0512001.html" target="_blank">Available here</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/behavioral-political-economy/">Behavioral Political Economy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaders, Your Choice of Words Matters</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/leaders-your-choice-of-words-matters/</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Competition in Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been teaching college economics for a little over two decades now. Years ago I learned that I need to watch very closely my choice of language in the classroom. For example, early in my teaching days I would lace a &#8220;hell&#8221; and a &#8220;damn&#8221; or two into my lectures. I can&#8217;t say I pondered the reasons very carefully. I suppose I was just trying to be relatable and have an effect. But soon I...<br /><a href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/leaders-your-choice-of-words-matters/">Read more&#187;</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/leaders-your-choice-of-words-matters/">Leaders, Your Choice of Words Matters</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #1d2129;">I&#8217;ve been teaching college economics for a little over two decades now. Years ago I learned that I need to watch very closely my choice of language in the classroom. For example, early in my teaching days I would lace a &#8220;hell&#8221; and a &#8220;damn&#8221; or two into my lectures. I can&#8217;t say I pondered the reasons very carefully. I suppose I was just trying to be relatable and have an effect. But soon I realized that my words had set a tone for the class, one that students would themselves adopt and carry even further. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #1d2129;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://thehill.com/sites/default/files/styles/thumb_small_article/public/trumpcurrykaepernick_092317getty.jpg?itok=RDjUs-0y" alt="" width="450" height="253" />At first I became a little surprised when they started dropping an occasional &#8220;bullshit&#8221; or &#8220;fuck&#8221; in addition to my seemingly innocuous &#8220;hells&#8221; and &#8220;damns&#8221;. My naivety wore off when I internalized the fact that, at least in the little micro society of my class, I am a leader. And people will follow my lead. So I quickly stopped cussing in the classroom, and ever since I&#8217;ve consciously tried to keep an elevated and respectful tone, one where students can be productive and decent with one another. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: #1d2129;">Our Whatever-in-Chief needs to learn this lesson, because like it or not people follow his lead, and his words are degrading our society. </span></p>
<p>This blog grew out of Wayne&#8217;s and my 2013 <a href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/book/">book</a>, <em>Madmen, Intellectuals, and Academic Scribblers</em>. In that book we take seriously the effect that ideas have on social institutions. Words matter. Words of leaders especially matter. And when their words are unfitting of their leadership positions, they make themselves unfit for those positions.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/leaders-your-choice-of-words-matters/">Leaders, Your Choice of Words Matters</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacLean&#8217;s book on the KKK reviewed in the Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences:</title>
		<link>https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/macleans-book-on-the-kkk-reviewed-in-the-journal-of-the-history-of-behavioral-sciences/</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jul 2017 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Lopez]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/?p=1649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Capture3.jpg"></a> &#8220;The fact that this book has won two prestigious prizes raises a question: does evidence count anymore in history?&#8221; <a href="http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~kousser/book%20reviews/maclean.pdf">http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~kousser/book%20reviews/maclean.pdf</a> &#160;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/macleans-book-on-the-kkk-reviewed-in-the-journal-of-the-history-of-behavioral-sciences/">MacLean&#8217;s book on the KKK reviewed in the Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences:</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a href="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Capture3.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1650" src="http://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Capture3-269x300.jpg" alt="Capture3" width="269" height="300" srcset="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Capture3-269x300.jpg 269w, https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Capture3.jpg 628w" sizes="(max-width: 269px) 100vw, 269px" /></a>&#8220;The fact that this book has won two prestigious prizes raises a question: does evidence count anymore in history?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~kousser/book%20reviews/maclean.pdf">http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~kousser/book%20reviews/maclean.pdf</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com/macleans-book-on-the-kkk-reviewed-in-the-journal-of-the-history-of-behavioral-sciences/">MacLean&#8217;s book on the KKK reviewed in the Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences:</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://politicalentrepreneurs.com">Madmen, Intellectuals, &amp; Academic Scribblers</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
