<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" --><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Marc Laperrouza</title>
	<link>http://liftlab.com/think/marc</link>
	<description>Time to look East...</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MarcLaperrouza" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Regulating search engines?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/RNpc87a8qZ0/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/11/06/regulating-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
<category>allthingsweb</category><category>business</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/11/06/regulating-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In addition to the attempt to standardize the Internet of Things,  the Chinese Internet [community] is also paying attention to the regulation of search engines.
Baidu - the leading Chinese search engine and potentially most formidable competitor for Google in the long-run - has joined the Internet Society of China and the China Communications Standards Association to publish a set of search engine marketing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the attempt to standardize the <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/30/a-standard-for-the-internet-of-things/">Internet of Things</a>,  the Chinese Internet [community] is also paying attention to the regulation of search engines.</p>
<p>Baidu - the leading Chinese search engine and potentially most formidable competitor for Google in the long-run - has joined the Internet Society of China and the China Communications Standards Association to publish a set of search engine marketing regulations aimed at &#8220;developing the sector as a reliable source of news and business&#8221;.</p>
<p>Officially, the idea is to drive out disreputable companies who tarnish the reputation of search engine marketing in China. Something of a twist since this comes one year after Baidu came under fire for blocking searches containing words associated with the melamine milk scandal or having accepted money from fraudulent medical companies to figure prominently in search results!</p>
<p>What if this self-enligthened effort at self-regulation was to spread outside of China?  And, more importantly, will Google join the bandwagon?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/RNpc87a8qZ0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/11/06/regulating-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/11/06/regulating-search-engines/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A standard for the Internet of Things?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/ogKD2ITW9tM/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/30/a-standard-for-the-internet-of-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 05:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/30/a-standard-for-the-internet-of-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably remember the strategic importance for China to become a leader in standard-setting. Mobile telephony, digital TV, wireless Internet, no technology seems to escape the appetite of Chinese engineers to participate in defining the trajectories of tomorrow&#8217;s technologies.
Their focus has now turned to the Internet of Things. Earlier last month, the Ministry of Industry and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You probably remember the strategic importance for China to become a leader in standard-setting. <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/01/02/here-comes-4g/">Mobile telephony</a>, <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/08/08/free-mobile-access-to-beijing-games-in-china/">digital TV</a>, <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/08/21/wapi-or-wimax/">wireless Internet</a>, no technology seems to escape the appetite of Chinese engineers to participate in defining the trajectories of tomorrow&#8217;s technologies.</p>
<p>Their focus has now turned to the Internet of Things. Earlier last month, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology&#8217;s (MIIT) National IT Standardization Technical Committee has established a working group of sensor network experts to create a draft national standard for the Internet of Things.</p>
<p>They come in the footsteps of Europe&#8217;s Casagras project (including participants from France, the UK, Japan, Korea and&#8230;China) which aims at establishing standards for the communications and encoding used for the objects of the Internet of Things.</p>
<p>While China and other countries had little to say in the &#8220;standardization of the Internet&#8221;, it will be interesting to see whether a different (and functional) governance model emerges from opening participation to other countries.</p>
<p>P.S.: <a href="http://www.rfidglobal.eu/">Casagras</a>, which stands for Coordination And Support Action for Global RFID-related Activities and Standardisation, has just issued its final report on RFID and the inclusive model for the Internet of Things</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/ogKD2ITW9tM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/30/a-standard-for-the-internet-of-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/30/a-standard-for-the-internet-of-things/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake semiconductors?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/Z7KUrtCCSOg/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/23/fake-semiconductors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/23/fake-semiconductors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Counterfeit semiconductors are an increasing problem. At least, that&#8217;s what the Director of the Semiconductor Industry Association testified in front of the U.S. Trade Policy Staff Committee on China&#8217;s compliance with its World Trade Organization (WTO).
They can result in anything from a consumer paying for a fast computer but getting a slow computer, to more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Counterfeit semiconductors are an increasing problem. At least, that&#8217;s what the Director of the Semiconductor Industry Association testified in front of the U.S. Trade Policy Staff Committee on China&#8217;s compliance with its World Trade Organization (WTO).</p>
<p>They can result in anything from a consumer paying for a fast computer but getting a slow computer, to more serious problems including failures in applications involving health and safety. In fact nowadays semiconductors are found everywhere, including in medical equipment, automotive or aerospace applications, or communications infrastructure for first responders.</p>
<p>Before you skin your computer to check if Intel is really inside, you should know that the most common problem is a remarked product, where the counterfeiter scrapes off the marking on the outside of an integrated circuit and remarks it with a different brand, speed, or part number. So, next time your computer slows down, don&#8217;t immediately blame Microsoft or your anti-virus provider&#8230;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/Z7KUrtCCSOg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/23/fake-semiconductors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/23/fake-semiconductors/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Here comes the CPhone…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/wosbhRjPqmc/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/16/here-comes-the-cphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 05:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/16/here-comes-the-cphone/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

A lot of attention has been going to the debut of China Mobile&#8217;s OPhone and to the soon-to-be launched iPhone - China Unicom&#8217;s first job will be to &#8220;convert&#8221; the estimated 10 million users who own smuggled iPhones (mainly the older 3G and 2G models) and subscribe to China Mobile&#8230;


So, what has been the answer of China Telecom, who owns the third licence [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">A lot of attention has been going to the debut of China Mobile&#8217;s <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/05/01/a-chinese-os-for-mobiles/">OPhone</a> and to the soon-to-be launched iPhone - China Unicom&#8217;s first job will be to &#8220;convert&#8221; the estimated 10 million users who own smuggled iPhones (mainly the older 3G and 2G models) and subscribe to China Mobile&#8230;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>So, what has been the answer of China Telecom, who owns the third licence of for mobile services? The Cphone! The Android-operated CPhone has been designed and developed by Access (a Japanese provider of advanced software technologies for mobiles). According to insiders, the CPhone is a touch-screen handset with a flash animation style user interface. It is integrated with an RSS news feed function, mobile mail, mobile Internet browser and <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2008/08/08/free-mobile-access-to-beijing-games-in-china/">China Mobile Multimedia Broadcasting </a>(CMMB) chip and service.</td>
<td><a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/files/2009/09/cphone.jpg" title="cphone.jpg"><img src="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/files/2009/09/cphone.jpg" alt="cphone.jpg" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">The phone will retail for approximately RMB 1,500 (USD 220). That compares quite favorably against the pricey iPhone RMB 4000 (USD 585) or to a smuggled 3GS 16GB costs RMB 5,500 (USD 800). Let&#8217;s see what the ratio of price/brand sensitive Chinese consumers is.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/wosbhRjPqmc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/16/here-comes-the-cphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/16/here-comes-the-cphone/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The turning point?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/B7EIeU-9vtw/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/09/the-turning-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 05:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/09/the-turning-point/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Once every 3 years the world of telecommunication comes together under the aegis of the United Nation&#8217;s International Telecommunication Union.


This year, any visitor would be struck by the massive presence of Chinese companies. Equipment manufacturers (like ZTE or Huawei) are displaying their latest technologies. Chinese operators have made the trip to Geneva as well - China Mobile is even a premium [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">Once every 3 years the world of telecommunication comes together under the aegis of the United Nation&#8217;s International Telecommunication Union.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>This year, any visitor would be struck by the massive presence of Chinese companies. Equipment manufacturers (like ZTE or Huawei) are displaying their latest technologies. Chinese operators have made the trip to Geneva as well - China Mobile is even a premium sponsor of the event.The presence of China Mobile and China Unicom can in part be explained by a public relations effort - showing [off] their technological savvy (3G, LTE). Part may be an effort to build brands for future market penetration.</td>
<td><img src="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/files/2009/10/portfolio1.jpg" alt="portfolio1.jpg" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">Let&#8217;s see when the Swisscom and T-Mobile of this world will have to defend their home turf against China Mobile!</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/B7EIeU-9vtw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/09/the-turning-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/09/the-turning-point/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>After the compass and gunpowder</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/KECCbsZZiWQ/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/02/after-the-compass-and-gunpowder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 05:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/02/after-the-compass-and-gunpowder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have probably been bored numerous time with the four great inventions of ancient China - namely the compass, gunpowder, papermaking and printing - and how close the middle kingdom was of doing its industrial revolution during the Sung dynasty (960 AD-1280 AD).
A millenium later, it is time to look back at the major technological development [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably been bored numerous time with the four great inventions of ancient China - namely the compass, gunpowder, papermaking and printing - and how close the middle kingdom was of doing its industrial revolution during the Sung dynasty (960 AD-1280 AD).</p>
<p>A millenium later, it is time to look back at the major technological development of the People&#8217;s Republic. For its 60th birthday, the official news agency Xinhua has highlighted the following achievements in the field of science and technology:<br />
- Li Siguang&#8217;s theory on geomechanics which allowed the discovery of the Daqinq oil field (1959)<br />
- the explosion of China&#8217;s first atomic bomb in Xinjiang (1964) which projected the country in the league of nuclear powers<br />
- Yuan Longping&#8217;s development of hybrid rice varieties (in the 1970s) which helped China move towards autonomy<br />
- connection to the Internet (May 1994)<br />
- the launch of China&#8217;s first lunar exploration satellite (2007) and the coining of a new word for a Chinese traveling in space (<a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2007/11/02/get-used-to-taikonauts-and-to-the-chinese-galileo/">taikonaut</a>)</p>
<p>Nowadays, China cooperates with foreign multinationals (when it doesn&#8217;t buy them out) to explore oil at home and abroad; it plans to build 50 nuclear <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/">reactors</a> over the next 10 years, to plant the Chinese flag on the moon. Finally, it quietly became the country with the largest number of netizens.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what the next 60 years bring us!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/KECCbsZZiWQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/02/after-the-compass-and-gunpowder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/10/02/after-the-compass-and-gunpowder/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Chinese IT workers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/7KC7wIsdiJY/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/25/protecting-chinese-it-workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 05:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/25/protecting-chinese-it-workers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Ever heard of the &#8220;High-Tech - No Rights?&#8221; campaign? It is an initiative started in 2007 by a number of NGOs concerned by the labor conditions of IT workers in China.


The campaigns aims to improve the working conditions of IT workers in China by coupling a top-down and bottom-up approach. In a nutshell, leading IT manufacturers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">Ever heard of the &#8220;High-Tech - No Rights?&#8221; campaign? It is an initiative started in 2007 by a number of NGOs concerned by the labor conditions of IT workers in China.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>The campaigns aims to improve the working conditions of IT workers in China by coupling a top-down and bottom-up approach. In a nutshell, leading IT manufacturers are encouraged to include (and follow) a code of conduct in their corporate social responsibility (CSR) chart. At the same time, workers undergo in-factory labor rights training program in China. While HP and Delta Electronics have already initiated such training programs, other leading manufacturers like Acer, Apple or Dell are yet to join the bandwagon.</p>
<p align="left">The question is of course how &#8220;deep in the value chain&#8221; such an initiative can reach. Many manufacturers are already working closely with <font face="TimesNewRoman">first-tier suppliers to ensure reasonable working conditions. But the real challenge lies in offering similar working conditions to employees working for second-tier and third-tier suppliers in some remote factory, somehere in China.</font></p>
</td>
<td><a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/files/2009/09/high-tech.jpg" title="high-tech.jpg"><img src="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/files/2009/09/high-tech.jpg" alt="high-tech.jpg" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colSpan="2">P.S.: Consumers are of course welcome to make informed choices when buying their next computer</td>
</tr>
</table>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/7KC7wIsdiJY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/25/protecting-chinese-it-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/25/protecting-chinese-it-workers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Can China Mobile beat Apple?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/09TBdOzWP7s/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/18/can-china-mobile-beat-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/18/can-china-mobile-beat-apple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever heard of Symbian? It is, for the time being, the leading operating system for smart mobile devices and soon to become completely open-source. But competition from Apple&#8217;s iPhone may seriously jeopardize its position.
That&#8217;s when China Mobile steps in. The Chinese operator promises to offer technology support to the Symbian Foundation - in return, Symbian will support China [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of Symbian? It is, for the time being, the leading operating system for smart mobile devices and soon to become completely open-source. But competition from Apple&#8217;s iPhone may seriously jeopardize its position.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s when China Mobile steps in. The Chinese operator promises to offer technology support to the Symbian Foundation - in return, Symbian will support China Mobile&#8217;s construction of TD-SCDMA 3G network. And with close to 500 millions subscribers, it is not an insignificant endorsement.</p>
<p>China Mobile&#8217;s support is naturally not devoid of interest. Between the battle for an <a href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/05/01/a-chinese-os-for-mobiles/">OS</a> and the iPhone&#8217;s entry in the Chinese market, the trial of strength between the operator and the manufacturer is far from over.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/09TBdOzWP7s" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/18/can-china-mobile-beat-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/18/can-china-mobile-beat-apple/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Power China [2/2]: Solar</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/G3jrIV95HHM/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/11/power-china-22-solar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 05:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/11/power-china-22-solar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While China is catching up with France in terms of nuclear reactors, it seems to pursue alternative energy sources with a similar enthusiasm. Beside wind farms in Inner Mongolia, solar power is getting into the mainstream - according to the World Bank, most water heaters in China are solar thermal heaters and China is said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While China is catching up with France in terms of <a target="_blank" href="http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/">nuclear reactors</a>, it seems to pursue alternative energy sources with a similar enthusiasm. Beside wind farms in Inner Mongolia, solar power is getting into the mainstream - according to the World Bank, most water heaters in China are solar thermal heaters and China is said to already produce more than 60% of the world’s solar cells (with plans to expand abroad).</p>
<p>Beijing is using a typical mix of incentives to gain critical mass: governments at all levels are offering solar panel producing firms subsidies - free land, R&amp;D grants - while bank offer very attractive loans.</p>
<p>Unfortunately the battle for an eco-frienly environment is is far from won: the objective to grow the installed capacity from 2GW to 20GW (the equivalent of 20 nuclear reactors&#8230;) of solar energy by 2020 is less than half the capacity of coal-fired power plants built annually.</p>
<p>P.S.: China Mobile established the world&#8217;s largest solar energy-powered base station cluster in Tibet</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/G3jrIV95HHM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/11/power-china-22-solar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/11/power-china-22-solar/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Power China [1/2]: Nuclear</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~3/j5aF4nfZcpU/</link>
		<comments>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>marc</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China is sourcing its energy demand from increasingly diversifed, both geographically and technologically - a welcome change from its &#8220;coal-only&#8221; approach - but the country has still a long way to go to balance its energy mix.
Take nuclear energy for instance. During the 90s, the country has only 3 reactors in operation - 2 in Daya Bay [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is sourcing its energy demand from increasingly diversifed, both geographically and technologically - a welcome change from its &#8220;coal-only&#8221; approach - but the country has still a long way to go to balance its energy mix.</p>
<p>Take nuclear energy for instance. During the 90s, the country has only 3 reactors in operation - 2 in Daya Bay and 1 in Qinshan. Today, 11 reactors are running with more than 8 Gigawatt (GW) of installed capacity.</p>
<p>In 2006, nuclear energy accounted for 1.1% of electricity production, nothing in comparison with  thermal&#8217;s 77.8% (of which  68.7% from coal&#8230;) or even hydro-power&#8217;s 20.7%. But 16 new reactors are under construction (for 15 GW) and 34 more (for 32 GW) are planned till 2020. That will place China at par with the world leader France which currently counts 59 reactors and 63GW - just remember that the Chinese population is 200 times larger.</p>
<p>The good news: the country has pledged a 20% reduction of its energy intensity (energy consumption per unit of GDP) by 2010.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MarcLaperrouza/~4/j5aF4nfZcpU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://liftlab.com/think/marc/2009/09/04/power-china-12-nuclear/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
