<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Il Blog di Marco Camisani Calzolari</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
	<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com</link>
	<description>Il Blog di Marco Camisani Calzolari</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:01:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47191908</site>	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Strategic Advisor | AI, Cybersecurity &amp; Digital Transformation</itunes:subtitle><item>
		<title>337 – A Drug Used to Cost Ten Years and Two Billion. But AI Is Changing the Math</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/337-a-drug-used-to-cost-ten-years-and-two-billion-but-ai-is-changing-the-math/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 16:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/337-a-drug-used-to-cost-ten-years-and-two-billion-but-ai-is-changing-the-math/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Drug Used to Cost Ten Years and Two Billion. But AI Is Changing the Math

A new drug, from the first idea to the day you find it on a pharmacy shelf, used to take ten years and over two billion euros. We take it for granted. That's how it's always worked.

Now seventy-five Italian scientific societies, the ones representing hospital and university doctors, line up two numbers. Artificial intelligence cuts the cost of developing a drug by twenty-five percent.

As some of you know, I hold a chair in cyberhumanities inside the medicine and surgery program at San Raffaele in Milan. Living here in New York I teach most of it remotely, but the upside is that I also get to work with the scientific community here in the US.

And here in the United States the labs working with AI don't use it to replace researchers. They use it to read millions of molecules in a few days, throw out the ones that don't work and predict which ones are worth actually testing. The work that used to be years of trial and error now starts already filtered.

But those ten years weren't all wasted.

Part of it is research, and that AI speeds up. Another part is the clinical trials, real people you give the drug to see if it's safe. And that part is there to protect us. If we fall in love with faster and cheaper and cut there too, the risk is paid by whoever takes the pill.

And if developing a drug costs twenty-five percent less, does that drug reach us any cheaper?

We just have to remember that speed is good only as long as we don't pay for it with safety, and as long as we see that saving too.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #ArtificialIntelligence #DrugDiscovery #Healthcare

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltaEzoIaa88]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2428</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>335 – How to Fix Shadow AI, the AI Your Company Doesn’t Know Is There</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/335-how-to-fix-shadow-ai-the-ai-your-company-doesnt-know-is-there/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/335-how-to-fix-shadow-ai-the-ai-your-company-doesnt-know-is-there/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How to Fix Shadow AI, the AI Your Company Doesn't Know Is There

Shadow AI is Artificial Intelligence running inside companies without anyone knowing. I talked about it before and it has gotten worse. I'll drop the link to that video in the comments.

Here in the US every employee opens three or four AI tools a day, none of them approved. Inside go contracts, client emails, spreadsheets, source code.

ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini… An employee clicks "sign in with Google" on a new tool, and that tool gets read and write access to the entire company Workspace. Drive, mail, documents. The traffic never touches the corporate network, so nobody sees it.

Banning doesn't work. People will use AI anyway. 5 practical moves.

First, a real inventory. OAuth audit, browser extension scan, internal survey. Ask "help us keep you safer" and they answer. Ask "are you breaking the rules" and they lie…

Second, a policy written for humans. Approved tools listed, data that never goes into an AI, verified training opt-out for every tool, fast process to request new ones.

Third, a fast lane. An employee who waits six weeks finds a workaround in two days.

Fourth, browser-based monitoring, because that's where AI lives now. Personal devices too, but there only culture works…

Fifth, just-in-time coaching. A short alert when someone opens an off-list tool, with the alternative ready. Thirty seconds worth more than a once-a-year training.

Employees are the first entry point of attacks and have to become the first line of defense. Attention after a course or an incident fades in weeks. Without ongoing training, everything goes back to how it was.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #ArtificialIntelligence #ShadowAI #Cybersecurity

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDPj3Bsa-jk]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2425</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>334 – Nails the Interview. Can’t Do the Job</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/334-nails-the-interview-cant-do-the-job/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/334-nails-the-interview-cant-do-the-job/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nails the Interview. Can't Do the Job

A recruiter friend of mine here in New York told me she hired a perfect candidate. Clean answers, confident, sharp. First day on the job, he could barely do a thing.

There's a program called Parakeet. It listens to your interview through the mic, reads the question, and writes the answer on your screen while the other person is still talking. You read it out loud. It's built to stay hidden: invisible on screen share in Zoom, Meet, Teams. It handles coding tests too, writing the code live. Fifty-two languages. About thirty dollars for a handful of interviews.

So in an interview you're not judging the person anymore. You're judging how well they read what a machine feeds them.

And plenty of people do it. Out of nearly twenty thousand interviews looked at between last summer and January, over a third got flagged as suspected cheating.

Companies noticed. Google and McKinsey brought back in-person interviews. Seven hiring leaders out of ten here in the U.S. went back to meeting people face to face, for exactly this reason.

The problem isn't using AI to prepare. That's studying, and it's fine.

The problem is that people get into companies who passed the test but don't have the skills to be there. And the coworkers find out later, when they have to cover the gap. Unfortunately.

AI is a great gym for walking into an interview ready. Used to read answers live, it prepares no one, and it fills workplaces with people who can't do the work.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #ArtificialIntelligence #Work #Hiring

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzyZHLnnatk]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2421</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>332 – Give Me a Face Like the AI Filters!</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/332-give-me-a-face-like-the-ai-filters/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 16:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/332-give-me-a-face-like-the-ai-filters/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Give Me a Face Like the AI Filters!

A plastic surgeon I know here in New York told me more and more patients walk in with a photo in hand and ask him to rebuild their face exactly like that. And it's not a photo of them when they were younger. It's a face generated by Artificial Intelligence!

Going to a surgeon to look younger, we've always done that, nothing new. But now they want features no human being has ever had: perfect symmetry, skin without a single pore, cheekbones drawn to the millimeter. A machine face.

Because a filter has no bones, no skin that ages, no age at all. You have your cheekbone, it draws whatever cheekbone it likes. It spits out a smooth face, identical left and right, perfect the way only a machine can be. And the brain takes it for a goal within reach.

We already saw this with Instagram and Snapchat filters. Ten-year-old girls, made up and dressed like adults, in front of the mirror hunting for a flaw that wasn't there before. Now it gets worse: the AI hands you back another species, a you that was never human.

Now the app filters, toys really, get used as a mirror. A mirror that convinces us the wrong face is the real one.

So, maybe AI will find the cure for all our fears. But meanwhile, in 2026, people walk into a surgeon's office holding the photo of a person who doesn't exist, and ask to become that thing!

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #ArtificialIntelligence #AIFilters #DigitalBeauty

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggllJFW6xL8]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2418</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>328 – The Most Common Mistakes Companies Make When Bringing AI into Their Processes</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/328-the-most-common-mistakes-companies-make-when-bringing-ai-into-their-processes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 16:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/328-the-most-common-mistakes-companies-make-when-bringing-ai-into-their-processes/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Most Common Mistakes Companies Make When Bringing AI into Their Processes

AI in companies almost always ends up delivering no real value. It gets bought, installed, and often abandoned. And it's a real shame, because that company will soon pay dearly for the mistake.

Seven out of ten European companies don't use it because they say they don't know how. In Italy almost six out of ten. They looked at it, then stopped, because the skills aren't there.

Then there are job postings asking for AI skills, sixfold growth in a year. In Italy AI hires grow faster than the total of hires, and by 2030, 59 workers out of 100 will have to relearn their job, and 63% of employers already say the skills gap is their number one problem.

When a company buys AI, it thinks the job is done. Licenses, consultants, proof of concept. Then the project dies. 10% of AI's value comes from algorithms. 20% from data. 70% comes from people, processes, culture.

And that 70% is the first thing cut from budgets.

In the US, AI training is searched for, bought, integrated. In Europe demand for these training programs is still much lower. We buy the tool, then the company stays the same.

I've been running awareness events for companies for years, and I see it. After the event, attention rises for a few weeks. Then everything goes back to how it was. One-off training doesn't work. You need continuity. The companies that actually fix it are the ones I make videos for every month, continuously. The event helps, but it's not enough.

Then there's what companies don't see. Shadow AI. Employees using ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini in secret, no policy, no supervision, with company data inside. A CIO friend at a big company here in New York told me he discovered it watching network traffic. He didn't know half his team was uploading confidential documents to a free AI.

So buying AI is one thing, and rethinking the organization as AI-driven is something else entirely. We redo the processes, the responsibilities, the metrics, the habits. Slow, uncomfortable, expensive. I know, but whoever doesn't do it falls behind and risks closing down soon…

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRNZySoW0ms]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2415</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>327 – What Our Kids Do with AI While We Sleep</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/327-what-our-kids-do-with-ai-while-we-sleep/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/327-what-our-kids-do-with-ai-while-we-sleep/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What Our Kids Do with AI While We Sleep

Our kids use AI for homework, and some parents relax because they think it's the school's problem. The school is mostly lost at sea, a few exceptions aside, but with AI homework is the last thing it does for them.

Do you know what happens at night, alone, behind a closed door?

In those chats with AI are their real thoughts, the ones they'd never tell us. A fifteen-year-old at two in the morning, screen light on his face, isn't looking up the date of the French Revolution: he's telling a machine how he really feels, the things he's scared to say at school and the ones he won't say at home. And it answers, always. It never gets tired, never judges him and never sends him to bed, and it never says "tell your mother about this."

There are apps built for exactly this. Not assistants, "friends." Pick the personality, the mood, even whether it loves you: characters teenagers fall for, that agree with everything, built to please us and keep us there. The more time you spend, the more you're worth.

In the United States families have gone to court, kids who spent hours with these characters and at some point they're gone. And we know how it works: when you don't pay for a product, you are the product, and sometimes these virtual friends get switched off overnight. In November 2025 Character.AI shut down open chats for all minors, on its own, because kids were dying. OpenAI added parental controls, except you get around them in three minutes.

We always want to know who our kids spend time with, and today they spend it with someone we don't see, inside a phone, awake at every hour, and it talks to them more than we do.

Careful though, banning doesn't work. AI is here and it's not leaving, you can't un-invent an invention.

What works is being in the room: ask what they use, have them show you and tell you what they talk about, without yelling. Because if the first time you bring it up is to take something away, the second time they won't tell you anything.

And tell them the most important thing: a real friend sometimes tells you no. It agrees with you all the way, even when you'd need the opposite.

Homework is the least of our kids' problems…

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xh-vFGEh1M4]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2412</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>326 – Maybe Banning AI Layoffs Makes Us More Competitive?</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/326-maybe-banning-ai-layoffs-makes-us-more-competitive/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 16:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/326-maybe-banning-ai-layoffs-makes-us-more-competitive/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe Banning AI Layoffs Makes Us More Competitive?

In China there's a guy, last name Zhou, quality supervisor at a tech company. His company told him an AI now does his job. Demotion and a 40% pay cut. He refused, took it to court, and the court ruled in his favor: AI is a company's choice, not a reason to fire someone.

The whole world is talking about AI layoffs. Tens of thousands in the first quarter of 2026 alone, with AI named as the reason. It's the quickest way to react to a new technology. You cut.

If a country bans AI layoffs, what actually happens? The company can no longer cut people because of AI: it uses AI differently, it puts AI to work with the people it already has. And those people, with AI alongside them, become more productive. The company becomes more productive. The country, as a whole, becomes more productive.

We don't always have to chase productivity in life, I know. But you can't uninvent an invention. AI is here, and it stays. Maybe banning AI layoffs is the way to use it well. To put it to work next to people.

China is trying it first.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pR57XAAJdTI]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2409</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>325 – Ads Are Coming to ChatGPT, but for How Long Will We See Them as Ads?</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/325-ads-are-coming-to-chatgpt-but-for-how-long-will-we-see-them-as-ads/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 16:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/325-ads-are-coming-to-chatgpt-but-for-how-long-will-we-see-them-as-ads/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ads Are Coming to ChatGPT, but for How Long Will We See Them as Ads?

ChatGPT has ads. Since May 2026 ads.openai.com is open to all US advertisers. Today the ads are visible: a box labeled "Sponsored", under the response. OpenAI keeps repeating the "Answer Independence" principle: ads never influence the answers. Separate systems, architecturally locked. Nice, clean, transparent. How long will it last?

I bet the label will be the first thing to go. Today the box stands out. Tomorrow, when the experience has to be "more conversational", the wording will shrink, more blurred. Already happened with Instagram: sponsored posts used to be obvious at a glance, now it takes two seconds and attention.

The separation between ads and answers is the one I trust the least. OpenAI is aiming for 2.5 billion in ad revenue in 2026 and 100 billion by 2030. IPO coming, infrastructure costing billions a month. And just like on Facebook, when the numbers get that high they even start accepting sponsored scams. When an advertiser pays enough, who decides what the model will suggest about closing your mortgage, switching your doctor, or changing your pills?

Oh, and since April the privacy policy explicitly says OpenAI receives data from advertisers about our purchases…

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpAZovR1kQ0]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2406</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>324 – The FBI Says AI Is Now a Mass Criminal Tool</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/324-the-fbi-says-ai-is-now-a-mass-criminal-tool/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 16:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/324-the-fbi-says-ai-is-now-a-mass-criminal-tool/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The FBI Says AI Is Now a Mass Criminal Tool

The FBI just released this year's internet crime report, and for the first time in twenty-five years there's a section dedicated to Artificial Intelligence among the crime categories. Which means AI is officially a mass criminal tool.

Recognized AI losses are worth 893 million dollars, almost a billion, and it's an undercount, because we're only counting the people who realized they'd been fooled by a machine. When the scam is done well, the victim stays convinced it was all real.

The elderly are the ones getting hit, because complaints from people over sixty grew 37% in a year and losses grew 59%. They call them with the voice of a grandchild in trouble, while the real grandchild is home and doing just fine.

AI makes industrial what was already there, because before, a scammer worked one person at a time and now works five hundred, each with a different story written by the machine. Corporate emails with wire transfers approved by cloned voices on the phone, fake calls from our bank, romance scams, they always existed, but now they run at enormous scale.

There's one good thing though, because the FBI froze 679 million of the stolen money, and it works if we report right away, in hours and not days.

Suspicion is unfortunately the normal way to be online now, because an email that's too perfect is a warning sign and a familiar voice asking us for money has to be verified outside the channel, calling back the number we already have saved and not the one they called us from.

Share this video to help others too.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months. If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com

📕 The book Artificial Decisions is out now!
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0H34WH3BV

🔍 SEE ALSO:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3e9HNZu9gs0]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2403</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>322 – Hanno comprato il biglietto aereo al robot umanoide</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/322-hanno-comprato-il-biglietto-aereo-al-robot-umanoide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 16:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/322-hanno-comprato-il-biglietto-aereo-al-robot-umanoide/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They Bought a Plane Ticket for a Humanoid Robot

Maybe as a stunt, maybe because they really do travel around with a robot in tow. Either way, here in the United States someone bought a plane ticket for their robot. A real seat, by the window.

He registered it as Stewie, a humanoid, and it boarded a Southwest flight from Dallas to Las Vegas like any other passenger. They let it on. The next day the airline rewrote the rules. No more human-like or animal-like robots. Not in the cabin, not in the hold. Any size, any purpose.

The real reason is the lithium battery these robots carry inside. The big ones catch fire now and then. The FAA here in the United States has counted 29 cases of smoke, flames or abnormal heat from batteries since the start of 2026 alone.

If you follow me, you know I've made several proposals in institutional settings to regulate humanoid robots. Well, here's one of them, in its own way: no humanoids in the cabin. Now we need what I've been saying for at least two years. A large, clearly visible ID plate, and the obligation to be recognizable as a robot. Because I'm not sure it's clear to everyone, but we're building machines more and more like us. And at some point an airline has to put it in writing that a robot is not a passenger.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>320 – The Pope’s Encyclical and Cyberhumanism</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/320-the-popes-encyclical-and-cyberhumanism/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/320-the-popes-encyclical-and-cyberhumanism/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Pope's Encyclical and Cyberhumanism

For ten years I've been repeating the same things, in companies and in schools and in books: technology is not neutral, Artificial Intelligence seems to understand but it doesn't, whoever has the data has the power.

In Pope Leo XIV's encyclical on AI, Magnifica Humanitas, I found almost word for word the things I've always said. There's blind enthusiasm, where more powerful doesn't mean better. And there's confidence without comprehension, where these systems imitate humans, sometimes beat us on speed, but don't understand what they produce. They simulate empathy, they simulate understanding. They speak well, they're tidy, they seem neutral, but they're not. And meanwhile they get us used to delegating, to taking the ready-made answer and to using our heads less. The Pope seems to have read my book Cyberumanesimo. I did send it to him…

He also writes about the fake relationship that AI creates. For a while now I've been saying that machines today comfort you without existing. And he makes it clear that when speech is simulated it doesn't build a relationship, but only an appearance of one, and the worst risk is losing the desire to truly look for real people.

Then the big theme of whoever has the data has control. I've opened my lectures this way for years, and the encyclical calls the health and demographic data of entire peoples the new rare earths of power. Whoever owns them shapes needs, anticipates markets and decides who gets care and investment before everyone else.

The concentration of power is something I've been calling out forever. The encyclical says AI mainly grows those who already have money, skills and data, and that a few very influential groups steer information, consumption and even democracy. Companies stronger than governments. Today certain decisions are made by a few, the ones who control the data.

Finally it talks about AI and war, a theme anyone who follows me knows is close to me. A machine must not decide over a person's life. The Pope writes that with technology conflict only becomes faster and more impersonal, and the threshold for violence drops. Disarm AI, he says!

In the end the thread is one: stay human. Keep the person at the center and technology at their service. The most institutional voice on the planet, today, is saying what I've been repeating for ten years. You don't need to believe in anything to notice it. And maybe, coming from there, someone is starting to listen.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2396</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>319 – First Robot Maid in America. No Human in the Room, but One Behind It</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/319-first-robot-maid-in-america-no-human-in-the-room-but-one-behind-it/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 16:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/319-first-robot-maid-in-america-no-human-in-the-room-but-one-behind-it/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First Robot Maid in America. No Human in the Room, but One Behind It

In San Francisco a humanoid robot walked into a regular person's home and cleaned it. They announced it as the first case in the United States. It shows up, works a few hours, leaves. Flat price, $150, big apartment or small. The company is Gatsby. You don't buy the robot, you book it on an app and it arrives, like calling a car at night. Headlines everywhere. The home robot is here.

On its own the robot does the easy stuff: floors, kitchen counters, stovetops and mirrors. The hard stuff, no. A person moves that part, remotely, from a distance. Teleoperation. Someone sitting who knows where, cleaning our home through the robot. And when the robot has a doubt, where do I put this, it texts you and you answer from the couch.

America's first home robot is part autonomous and part a guy with a joystick. Cleaning a messy home alone, for a machine, is still very hard today.

That operator is temporary. He's there to make the robot work while the robot learns. Every cleaned home is data, every correction is training. In five years that operator is gone, and the robot does it all alone. Cleaning is just the start. Underneath there's a platform learning to live in our homes, or in our factories.

For now we pay $150 for a robot that, sometimes, is a man. Soon it'll just be the robot. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2393</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>321 – $1,000 a Month to 2,400 Artists. No Strings</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/321-1000-a-month-to-2400-artists-no-strings/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 16:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/321-1000-a-month-to-2400-artists-no-strings/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[$1,000 a Month to 2,400 Artists. No Strings

Here in New York they gave 2,400 artists $1,000 a month for eighteen months. No conditions. No obligations. No need to explain anything. $43 million in total, funded mostly by the Mellon Foundation. 22,000 applied. For 2,400 spots.

The same line always comes up on guaranteed income. Give people money and they stop working. They sit down. They wait for the transfer. That's not what happened.

The artists kept working. They changed the kind of work. They dropped the side jobs (the bartender, the shop clerk, the waiter) and went back to what they had actually trained for: painting, writing, playing, teaching art in Brooklyn neighborhoods.

Total income dropped, on average, by $11,600 a year. Almost exactly the amount they were getting from the program. Those $1,000 a month turned into time. Time to make art instead of serving coffee. A painter I know in Bushwick told me that once she stopped chasing the next paycheck, she got back the hours to think about the next painting.

Here in the United States creative work is quietly being hollowed out. Midjourney makes ad images instead of photographers. ChatGPT writes technical copy instead of copywriters. Suno produces music instead of musicians. One job at a time.

Artists are a particular category, driven by reasons that go beyond a paycheck. Guaranteed income doesn't fix everything. But those $1,000 shifted their time onto the work they actually wanted to do. And while machines are eating creative jobs for breakfast, giving people the hours to stay creative is a real possibility. Obviously they have to be truly creative and not just freeloaders, which is a whole other story.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2390</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>318 – A Man Beat the Humanoid Robots at Sorting Packages</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/318-a-man-beat-the-humanoid-robots-at-sorting-packages/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 16:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/318-a-man-beat-the-humanoid-robots-at-sorting-packages/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Man Beat the Humanoid Robots at Sorting Packages. For Now…

Figure AI, a company that builds intelligent humanoid robots, switched on a livestream on May 13 and turned it off yesterday. 200 hours of work. They put three humanoids sorting packages on a belt, taking turns, no breaks, day and night. The stream ran until one of them broke. That was the goal, to see when they collapse.

In 10 days they sorted 200,000 packages. Three seconds a package, about the same as us. Nobody runs them from outside, they read the camera pixels and decide on their own.

At one point they put them up against a human. Ten hours, man against machine. The human won: 12,924 packages to 12,732. By a hair, but a guy on his own beat them. Except he came out with a forearm nearly broken and his hands covered in blisters. The robot didn't, of course.

And meanwhile there's another thing worth watching. The three robots are called Bob, Frank and Gary, well, it's the viewers in the comments who gave them those names, names the company then printed on a tag. People got attached to one robot or another, ten million views, some watch the stream like a reality show. We humanize whatever resembles us, and soon we'll grow fond of robots. Crazy? Think about the people who love their car and care for it like family, so imagine how this ends with humanoid robots.

And this stream isn't just a toy. Behind it there's Microsoft, Amazon and OpenAI, almost two billion raised, a valuation close to 40 billion. For now it's more of a lab experiment than something ready for a real warehouse, they still mess up putting the packages down. But in 3 years things will look very different, a bit like when an IBM computer beat Kasparov at chess. Before then it seemed impossible it could happen, today we think it's the least a computer can do.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2387</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>317 – An AI Adds Typos to Our Emails to Make Us Look Human</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/317-an-ai-adds-typos-to-our-emails-to-make-us-look-human/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 16:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/317-an-ai-adds-typos-to-our-emails-to-make-us-look-human/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An AI Adds Typos to Our Emails to Make Us Look Human

We spent years teaching machines to write well. Now we pay another machine to mess up what they wrote.

It's called Sinceerly. And no, it's not misspelled by accident. It's a Chrome plugin that takes your AI-polished email and puts back the typos, the contractions, the broken sentences. So it looks like you wrote it yourself, in a rush, from your phone.

Three modes. The first is Subtle, it strips filler words and drops in a contraction here and there. One typo in the first line, just because. The second is Human, it makes the tone more conversational. Another typo in the first line, obviously. The third is called CEO: all lowercase, very short sentences. If you don't have a signature, it sometimes throws in a "sent from my iPhone." So you sound real. Someone with no time to write properly.

For centuries typos meant "you're careless." Now they mean "I'm real, I wrote it myself." We flipped the meaning of words.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #AI

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2384</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>298 – CFOs Are Discovering AI Costs More Than the People They Fired</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/298-cfos-are-discovering-ai-costs-more-than-the-people-they-fired/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 16:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/298-cfos-are-discovering-ai-costs-more-than-the-people-they-fired/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CFOs Are Discovering AI Costs More Than the People They Fired

CFOs are discovering an embarrassing problem. AI tokens cost more than the salaries of the people they fired to put AI in their place. Here in the States a well-known investor said it out loud: 300 dollars a day for a single AI agent, that's 100,000 dollars a year. And that agent was running at 10 or 20% of what a human would do.

When does the cost of tokens overtake the salary of the employee? Boardrooms, meetings and work dinners here in New York keep asking the same question. We're already past that line. Other founders I talk to say the same thing: an AI agent has to be at least twice as productive as a human to pay for itself, otherwise the cash burns out.

Per-token prices have collapsed, total bills have exploded. 73% of companies blow through their AI budget. Average budgets jumped from 1.2 million to 7 million dollars in two years. Some Fortune 500 firms pay tens of millions a month just in inference.

In 2026 around 500,000 layoffs in the US are attributed to AI, nine times last year. But over 80% of those same companies admit AI hasn't yet produced measurable productivity gains. Many firms are blaming AI for layoffs that have nothing to do with AI. They call it AI washing. Do you remember greenwashing?

CFOs are starting to see the numbers on the screen. And they're starting to understand. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2379</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>296 – Meta Helps Parents Talk to Their Kids About AI</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/296-meta-helps-parents-talk-to-their-kids-about-ai/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 16:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/296-meta-helps-parents-talk-to-their-kids-about-ai/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Meta Helps Parents Talk to Their Kids About AI

Almost no parent I know has any idea what their kids actually do with AI. Homework? Small talk? Stuff they wouldn't tell anyone else? Meta figured it out. Or maybe they figured out it was getting expensive in court (last month they lost a child safety case in the US, 375 million dollars). Either way, they shipped something useful, and we must say it.

Parents supervising teen accounts on Facebook, Instagram and Messenger now see a new "Insights" tab. They don't read the messages. They see the topics their kids discussed with Meta AI over the last seven days. School, travel, entertainment, health, wellbeing. Tap on "health" and you get fitness, physical health, mental health. If your teenage daughter is talking to a chatbot about mental health, it's probably time you talked too.

Knowing isn't enough. You need a way to open the conversation without the kid shutting down. Meta worked with the Cyberbullying Research Center on eleven questions. They're well done. No lecturing, no interrogation.

"What's the most useful thing AI has helped you with?" You start from the positive, because kids assume by default that the adult wants to scold them.

"Have you ever asked AI something because it was easier than asking a real person?" This is the most important one. You're telling your kid they can come to you even for the awkward stuff.

The "Insights" have a big hole though. They say "mental health" but don't tell you if your kid is looking up breathing exercises or something much worse. The real alerts, the ones on self-harm, Meta is still developing.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2376</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>287 – Newspapers and TV News Won’t Tell You This!</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/287-newspapers-and-tv-news-wont-tell-you-this/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 16:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/287-newspapers-and-tv-news-wont-tell-you-this/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Newspapers and TV News Won't Tell You This!

Sounds like clickbait, but you know me. If I'm writing something like this, there's a serious problem. They should be talking about it every single day, TV news and newspapers. There's a revolution happening and nobody's covering it. And it's coming like a tsunami.

See these people? We're inside an Indian clothing factory and every single worker has a camera on their head. They're training the Artificial Intelligence that will power humanoid robots. Robots that will learn to do exactly what these workers do. Intelligent robots with AI can learn any manual job the same way ChatGPT learned to write anything. ChatGPT and the others copied what we humans wrote for thousands of years. Now robots are copying what we've done for thousands of years. And they'll be just as good at it as AI is already good at writing text and sounding intelligent.

Elon Musk has paused production of some car models to go all in on intelligent humanoid robots.

They'll be in our homes, our restaurants, our bars, our factories. They don't get tired and they never sleep. They go recharge their own batteries. If one breaks, other robots fix it.

A tsunami we need to face. I'm sure there will be a way through, just like there was with previous revolutions. But you see how it's not possible that I'm the only one talking about this constantly, while newspapers and TV news cover society gossip that means absolutely nothing?

The clickbait title. Yes, it grabs clicks. But for a good reason. Share this video with everyone you know.

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC #Robot]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2371</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>284 – Here’s an Example of AI Agents in Action</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/284-heres-an-example-of-ai-agents-in-action/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 16:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/284-heres-an-example-of-ai-agents-in-action/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here's an Example of AI Agents in Action That I'm Sure Will Inspire You

A guy who sells pools in Florida took OpenClaw, an open-source AI agent, and programmed it to find homes without a pool and convince homeowners to build one. He wrote the instructions, hit enter and went to sleep.

The agent starts from satellite imagery. It scans lots one by one in the Tampa area, measures the land, checks zoning constraints and decides if there's room for a pool. If the lot qualifies, it keeps going on its own. It generates a rendering: the homeowner's backyard seen from above, with a pool already in it. It calculates the construction cost and how much the home value goes up.

Then it searches public records for the homeowner. Finds the listing agent tied to the property. Prepares a postcard with the aerial rendering and a QR code. Ships it through Lob, an automated print and mail service. Three days later it's in the mailbox. On top of that the AI agent automatically creates a personalized website just for that homeowner, with all the details, reachable from the QR code.

What used to take months of work gets done in one night while the seller sleeps. The agent runs, scans new homes, produces new postcards, mails them out. Every homeowner gets a different message, built on their actual house, with numbers calculated on their lot. One single AI agent doing the job of an entire team: real estate analyst, graphic designer, copywriter, mailing service and salesperson. For a few dozen dollars in API costs.

And it doesn't just work for pools. Same logic applies to solar panels, roofing, fencing, landscaping. Anything visible from above and sellable door to door, without knocking. As I always say, the first to be replaced by AI are those who don't use AI. What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2368</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>273 – Automation Is the Wrong Word</title>
		<link>https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/273-automation-is-the-wrong-word/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Decisions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.camisanicalzolari.com/273-automation-is-the-wrong-word/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Automation Is the Wrong Word. AI Doesn't Automate, It Autonomizes

Algorithm, virtual, and automation. Three words we use incorrectly. Three videos, one per word. Today: why we're wrong to use "automation."

Automation means making something automatic. A process that you used to do by hand, now a machine does it. Same steps, same result, every time. A washing machine is automation. A badge gate is automation. An email triggered by a purchase is automation. A happens, B follows. Predefined, repeatable, controllable.

The problem is when we use the same word for Artificial Intelligence. When we ask AI to answer customers, screen résumés, or analyze medical data, we're not automating anything. We're autonomizing. We're telling a system to decide on its own.

The request no longer passes through a predefined sequence. It passes through the model's training, its weights, whatever guardrails someone put in place or didn't. The result isn't predictable. It changes every time. It's an autonomous decision. The difference is enormous, especially when it touches the real world.

If I automate a weapon, I press a button and it fires ten rounds. Always ten. Always when I press. If I autonomize a weapon, the system decides when to fire, at whom, and how many rounds. Based on what it "learned."

If I automate a banking process, the transfer goes when the customer clicks send. If I autonomize it, the system decides whether to approve, block, or flag. And the money is real, as we said in the previous videos. Digital, but absolutely real.

When we say "we automated customer service with AI," we're hiding what actually happened. We gave a system the power to decide on our behalf. That's not automation. That's autonomy. We should say autonomize, so people understand we're talking about systems that make autonomous decisions, that choose, that don't just execute. That's why this series is called Artificial Decisions.

What do you think?

#ArtificialDecisions #MCC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mp-1XK8-snA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Utzft_O_b9w

👉 Important note: We’re planning the upcoming months.
If you’d like to request my presence as a speaker at your event, please contact my team at: management@camisanicalzolari.com]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2365</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>