<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Mark Hillman</title>
	
	<link>http://www.markhillman.com</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MarkHillman" /><feedburner:info uri="markhillman" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>More health care ‘help’ we can’t afford</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/bPmfB0a68Bw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/10/more-health-care-help-we-cant-afford/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/11/more-health-care-help-we-cant-afford/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legislators talk frequently about the Law of Unintended Consequences but rarely seem to recognize when a bill they support will, if passed, inevitably collide with that law.  Such is the case with House Bill 1021, which would require individual insurance policies to cover a normal pregnancy, childbirth, maternity care, pregnancy management and contraception.
At first glance, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/10/more-health-care-help-we-cant-afford/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/10/more-health-care-help-we-cant-afford/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A wonderfully concise ruling on TABOR</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/jritfcejbI0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/07/a-wonderfully-concise-ruling-on-tabor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The anti-taxpayer majority on the Colorado Supreme Court soon will have another chance to stand the constitution on its head, thanks to a remarkably unambiguous ruling by the Colorado Court of Appeals.
In an opinion written by Judge Sean Connelly, a three-judge panel ruled that the Colorado Department of Revenue cannot increase the severance tax rate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/07/a-wonderfully-concise-ruling-on-tabor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/03/07/a-wonderfully-concise-ruling-on-tabor/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated Coffee Treasures</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/T37aFz82tMU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/24/updated-coffee-treasurers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/24/updated-coffee-treasurers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just update our coffee listing, adding some new finds (Cafe Caliente in West Denver, Frankie&#8217;s Coffee in Fort Morgan) and suggestions, particularly from my West Slope friends (Leisure Mountain Studio in Yampa, The Looney Bean in Montrose, and Durango Joe&#8217;s in Durango).
Unfortunately, we&#8217;re also saying goodbye to some good ones: Perk &#38; Play in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/24/updated-coffee-treasurers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/24/updated-coffee-treasurers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats’ golden goose tax policy</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/b7JvssY-_Qg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/14/democrats-golden-goose-tax-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/14/democrats-golden-goose-tax-policy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the fairy tales that liberal politicians seem to believe — such as man-made global warming or that more government health care spending will reduce the deficit — there one fable they seem unable to comprehend: &#8220;The Goose That Laid the Golden Egg.&#8221;
Most will recall the story of the couple blessed by a goose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/14/democrats-golden-goose-tax-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/14/democrats-golden-goose-tax-policy/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>HB 1168: The Trial Lawyer Hypocrisy Act of 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/Iin8Zx6myPA/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/06/hb-1168-the-trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act-of-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/06/hb-1168-the-trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act-of-2010/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there&#8217;s one thing personal injury lawyers are especially good at, it&#8217;s exploiting the misfortunes of their clients while devising new ways to line their own pockets.
Colorado House Bill 1168 is this year&#8217;s prime example. While claiming to help injured parties receive full compensation for damages caused by the fault of someone else, what it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/06/hb-1168-the-trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act-of-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/02/06/hb-1168-the-trial-lawyer-hypocrisy-act-of-2010/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Workers can’t ignore cost of PERA ‘fix’</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/mwBSf7QBEHU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/26/workers-cant-ignore-cost-of-pera-fix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/26/workers-cant-ignore-cost-of-pera-fix/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rescuing the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) is nothing new for state lawmakers.  Twice in the last decade, legislators have thrown PERA a lifeline, forcing the state, school districts, local governments and finally even workers to chip in hundreds of millions of dollars to keep the plan afloat.
As recently as four years ago, PERA and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/26/workers-cant-ignore-cost-of-pera-fix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/26/workers-cant-ignore-cost-of-pera-fix/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Bennet silent on this backroom deal?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/WBR4gN7Z15I/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/20/why-is-bennet-silent-on-this-backroom-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/20/why-is-bennet-silent-on-this-backroom-deal/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When politicians pick winners and losers, the stench of sleazy backroom deals is inescapable.
Colorado&#8217;s appointed U.S. Senator, Michael Bennet, has inveighed against special deals, like the ones that purchased the health care votes of Nebraska&#8217;s Ben Nelson and Louisiana&#8217;s Mary Landrieu.  He also talks often about the need for more competition to control costs.
Yet Bennet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/20/why-is-bennet-silent-on-this-backroom-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/20/why-is-bennet-silent-on-this-backroom-deal/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado can’t afford another ‘business-friendly’ Democrat</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/D9lOFfnsPoE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/18/colorado-cant-afford-another-business-friendly-democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/18/colorado-cant-afford-another-business-friendly-democrat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After all the Hickenhoopla dies down, Colorado voters may experience a sick feeling of déjà vu as the Denver mayor and Democrat candidate for governor claims that he&#8217;s &#8220;business friendly.&#8221;
We&#8217;ve been down this campaign trail before, just four years ago, when nice guy Bill Ritter bent over backward to ingratiate himself to every gullible business [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/18/colorado-cant-afford-another-business-friendly-democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2010/01/18/colorado-cant-afford-another-business-friendly-democrat/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitting to all fields</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/eTNVIAMYgvY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/31/hitting-to-all-fields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/31/hitting-to-all-fields/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama may be a far better orator than George W. Bush, but when Bush delivered a message, despite his sometimes mangled syntax, everyone knew what he stood for.  Because Obama&#8217;s elocution is superior, only later do people realize they have no idea what he really meant.
If overhauling the nation&#8217;s health care system is so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/31/hitting-to-all-fields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/31/hitting-to-all-fields/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A viable initiative for freedom</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MarkHillman/~3/-uxXEGLRLXI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/21/a-viable-initiative-for-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 02:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hillman</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Capitol Review]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/21/a-viable-initiative-for-freedom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives and libertarians fight about social issues so routinely that we assume the differences are insurmountable. Most everyone on the center-right is dubious of big government, but when it comes to protecting the unborn or preserving the traditional definition of marriage, we are divided as to government&#8217;s proper role.
Yet when the threat of big government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/21/a-viable-initiative-for-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.markhillman.com/2009/12/21/a-viable-initiative-for-freedom/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
