Mastery Wizard

Wall Street Funded the Bolshevik Revolution - Professor Antony Sutton

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Sun, 20 Oct 2013 04:32:00 +0000

The Real Story Behind the Syria Attack

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 28 Aug 2013 02:24:00 +0000

David Icke is now launching his own 24/7 TV News Station with bases in UK and the US along with mobile units.

Here is a scathing and very accurate report on what is happening in Syria and how it it is part of a overall unfolding plan. More reports like this will be coming out of the People's Voice so that we can get access to information that the mass media will not report on.

http://youtu.be/gNDw4rDG5vg

Normally, I don't send out messages about political issues. But, this particular chain of events could lead to a WW-III kind of scenario and it is important that word gets out to everyone in order to change the dialogue and NOT let the puppet masters dominate the dialogue. The more people who demonstrate that they are wise to their machinations the more cautious they might be in executing some of their plans.

If US goes into Syria it could unleash a worldwide conflict that would likely even spread over to Asia and even involve Japan here where I live. Some believe Japan will remain neutral. But, that is hard having several US military bases on its soil.

The attack would likely cause a response from Iran, Russia, and China. The response could be military and the Russians have already moved ships into the region. China is watching closely and warning the US to tread carefully.

Here is an archived post that was since taken of the Mail On-line site. Thanks to internet archiving you have access to it, for now.

The article suggests that a false flag attack using chemical weapon was being planned by the puppet masters at least as far back as Jan, 2013. Title of the article:

U.S. 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad's regime'
Read more: http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html#ixzz2d9lm9JG5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Another news source confirms Russia's stance regarding Syria.

With talk of intervention growing in Washington and other Western capitals, the Russian newspaper Izvestia has published a rare interview with Bashar al-Assad, in which the Syrian president seems to be looking to shore up his support from his most powerful international ally:

You may be wondering, like many Russians, why Russia continues to stand by Syria. It is important to explain this reason to the general public: Russia is not defending President Bashar al-Assad or the Syrian government, since the Syrian people should decide their president and the most suitable political system—this is not the issue. Russia is defending the fundamental principles it has embraced for more than a hundred years, the first of which is independence and the policy of non-interference in internal affairs. Russia itself has suffered and continues to suffer from such interference. SOURCE LINK

I don't think Russia has been a shining light supporting independence and non-interference, however.

But, this is the line they are taking.

I mean, wasn't it Russia, at the center of the Soviet Union and the Communists, that went on an extermination rampage that took out 30-60 million people, mostly white Russians, by murder and starvation? They had an agenda, complete global domination. Note, that their plan is presently unfolding quite nicely.

If you want the history on that click HERE.

That link will take you to a long series of 15 minute segments that chronicle WWII in great detail with a focus on material that Hollywood has pretty much kept secret as it educated the world in the 'history of the victors'.

I have watched most of these segments and learned more than a thousand Hollywood movies could ever teach. If you start go through ALL of them as it weaves a picture unlike what we are fed in the mass media. Highly recommended, but in 15 minute chunks. It will take time to digest the volume of deception you have been subjected to for decades. It will challenge some of your thinking and you may not agree on every point. But, you will certainly learn MULTIPLE sides of the story, not just the Hollywood one where we are the heroes and liberators. We all had a hand in this mess, at least our forefathers did, and we are living off the bounty of this event to this day.

Take your time. Share if it moves you.

Chipping the World

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 13:20:00 +0000

If you would like to learn how far corporations would like to go to track your every move here is an informative site to keep you abreast of the latest developments in chip technology.

http://www.spychips.com/

Wal-Mart, the nation's largest retailer, has declared war on our privacy. The giant retailer has announced it will begin placing item-level RFID (Radio Frequency IDentification) tracking tags on clothing sold in its stores.

THIS IS HUGE NEWS. It is the first step to the planned roll-out of the Internet of Things, where global corporations like IBM, Procter & Gamble, and Wal-Mart's technology partner NCR plan to equip every product with a tracking device and use a network of RFID readers to monitor and observe YOU everywhere you go. It is the frightening world detailed in our book "Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID," and it has finally come to pass.

Click here to read the Wall Street Journal article.

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:43:00 +0000

THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX

One thing I have learned from living in Japan since 1985 is that human beings are much the same all over the world. We share much of the same dreams, aspirations, fears, and hopes. However, all of this is 'programmed' into us. The 'Japanese software' and the 'Canadian software' and the 'American software' are all quite different programmes. The 'bio-computers' also come in various shapes and sizes. The 'consciousness', let's call it the electricity that keeps all of us 'bio-computers' going is, however, universal. Electricity is electricity, 'Qi is Qi', consciousness is consciousness. What we call MIND is the programme and for aeons we have been programmed to be...well...worker robots.

Thinking out of the box requires us to first recognize our programming and begin to connect with 'consciousness' in order to change that programming to better ourselves, the world, and our overall contribution to the collective 'programme'. As long as there are bio-computers there will be programmers. The question is...who is doing the programming? Your TV? Ever wonder why the call it TV 'Programming'!?

Whose programme are you playing out? Your parents programme? Your teacher's programme? Your religion's programme? Your political leader's programme? Your friend's programme? My programme? Or YOUR programme? Who designed YOUR software?

And for what purpose?

Was it to be a slave to the banking cabals of the world? Was it to be a slave to your job? Was it to be a slave to your country or flag? Was it to be a slave of ideology or religion? Were you really born to be a suicide bomber, Kamikaze, leftist, anarchist, or right wing ideologue?

Were you born to hate people of other cultures, skin colours, and ways of thinking? Were you born to always live in fear, hopelessness, greed, and slavery to your programme?

These are all questions we can ask when we are wanting to live a life 'thinking out of the box' or 'thinking outside the programme'.

Once you realize that you are programmed you have taken the first important step to waking up.

Albert Einstein said, “You cannot solve a problem from the same consciousness that created it. You must learn to see the world anew.”

Another way to phrase this is, 'You cannot change the programme at the level of the programme. You have to step outside the programme, outside the box, and view your programme from the level of pure consciousness.'

Then you will be able to increasingly 'think outside the box'.

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:11:00 +0000

On September 3rd and 4th a slow moving typhoon hovered over Kumano and compounded with Kumano's own cloud cover to produce record breaking torrential rainfall. Parts of the region received the equivalent of 6 months to 1 years worth of normal rainfall producing devastation never before experience. One newspaper said it was once every 20,000 years kind of event.

Kumano normally is famous for having heavy rainfall. But, no one has ever seen anything like this before. Entire valleys became like huge lakes. The torrential rains caused a major ‘mountain tsunami’ and much devastation and loss of life. Many homes and shops were simply washed away with some people barely escaping with their lives. Roads were washed out in 56 places locally and many other local towns were hit badly as well.

Thankfully, most people could find safety. But, some unfortunately a few, mostly elderly, did not. At this time we have confirmed 13 fatalities and 1 missing person in Shingu. The damage to public roads and private property was immense. Many people lost their homes and all their belongings some without sufficient disaster insurance. So, they must rely on community support and the generosity of their friends and neighbours, and people like you!

We are very grateful for all the kind letters and offers of financial assistance from our Sister City friends in Santa Cruz and Natori and our many friends around the world.

If you would like to offer financial support please click HERE for instructions.

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Mon, 27 Jun 2011 04:20:00 +0000

Just testing ping.fm for posting messages. Looks like the rainy season is hanging in here a bit longer!

CIA Asset Susan Lindauer, cousin to Andy Card President Bush's Chief of Staff, blows the whistle on 9/11, Iraq

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Sat, 15 Jan 2011 09:15:00 +0000

1/10/2011 10:20

by Kevin Barrett, Truth Jihad

Susan Lindauer, author of Extreme Prejudice, is the first CIA asset to have spoken out, under her own name and for the record, on Israeli complicity in 9/11, the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center, and the specific, detailed foreknowledge of the time, target, and means of the 9/11 attacks held throughout the months prior to 9/11 by the CIA in general and Lindauer’s CIA handler, Richard Fuisz, in particular. She has also exposed her first-hand knowledge of pre-war intelligence and negotiations showing that Iraq was willing to give the US “anything it asked” and that the war was therefore–from the perspective of US interests–not only utterly unnecessary, but wildly counterproductive. Lindauer’s evidence points strongly to 9/11 being a coup d’etat by hard-line Zionists determined to steer the US into a self-destructive war on Israel’s enemies.

Listen to my complete interview with Susan Lindauer here. Below is a transcript of the first half of the interview.

Barrett
I understand that you had some 9/11 foreknowledge, but were actually busted for trying to explain to the Bush Administration through your cousin Andrew Card, that invading Iraq was insane, that the Iraqis were basically going to do anything we wanted anyway–they’ll agree to anything for peace–and that there would be a terrible resistance and a terrible war if there was an invasion. And for that very accurate and prescient warning, they went after you.

Lindauer
Well, you have a very good grasp of this issue, I will tell you. It is a complicated story. I was one of the very few (CIA) assets covering Iraq before the war. And I had established contact with the Iraqi embassy at the United Nations in New York back in August of 1996. And for seven years before the invasion, I was what they call a “back channel” to Iraq on the question of terrorism. That was my foremost priority. This was covert in the sense that it was covert to the West. But the Iraqis were fully informed as to who I was and what I was doing and what my purpose was. My motivation was that I hated the United Nations sanctions. I hated the genocidal consequences and suffering for the Iraqi people, most truly and genuinely–that was very sincere. And they knew it. And both sides knew my politics. In fact, the CIA had come to me knowing my politics and said “hey, why don’t you try to help us.” They co-opted me–they did–but I agreed to be co-opted. We all understood each other. And that’s very important for what happened.

Barrett
That’s not necessarily a bad thing. There is a role for people who are intermediaries between warring parties and who try to make peace. And it sounds like that’s what you were doing.

Lindauer
Yes indeed. And both sides understood my politics, that I wanted to help end the sanctions. And the CIA was very adamant that Iraq had to meet certain criteria in order for that to happen. And my contribution from the very first days was on terrorism. Our team started what we called preliminary talks with Baghdad in November of 2000, two years before the United Nations got involved. Our team started back channel talks to get Iraq’s agreement on the weapons inspections. And over the next fifteen months, my supervisor, Richard Fuisz (pronounced “fuse”), through talks at the Iraqi embassy, mostly with Iraq’s ambassador Dr. Sayeed Hassan, and with other senior Iraqi diplomats, on what conditions Iraq would have to accept in order to resume the weapons inspections. And at that point we had begun to develop a comprehensive peace framework which extended great support to anti-terrorism. Iraq agreed to let the FBI come into Baghdad and operate a task force that would have authority–this was before 9/11 ever happened! Nine months before 9/11 happened, Iraq agreed to have the FBI come into Baghdad with the authority to conduct terrorism investigations, interview witnesses, make arrests. After 9/11, Iraq agreed to give financial records on al-Qaeda to the United States. BUT the United states didn’t want to take the records.
Barrett
It makes you wonder why not.

Lindauer
Isn’t that an interesting question.

Barrett
It leads me to (my next question): You apparently had some kind of foreknowledge of 9/11. Can you explain to us what that was?

Lindauer
Yes. This is a very interesting thing, and I’m glad…I hope your audience will pay attention to this. We absolutely expected 9/11 to happen. And there’s a subtlety here that I hope your audience will appreciate. In April and May of 2001 I was summoned to my CIA handler’s office and told that I needed to confront the Iraqi diplomats at the United Nations, through my back channel, with a demand for any fragment of intelligence regarding airplane hijackings and/or airplane bombings. And over the summer, that progressed to a deep belief that there was going to be an airplane hijacking attack, and some sort of aerial strike, on the World Trade Center. We talked about this in our one-on-one meetings practically every week. Just so we are clear, this was not a one-time conversation. This was a major focus of our efforts. Richard (Fuisz, Lindauer’s CIA handler) was very worried about it, very agitated about it, how Iraq must give us this intelligence. Now, I don’t mean to patronize you, but I’m sure you’re familiar with the concept of deniability. I do not think that Richard Fuisz knew all the details of 9/11. However, he knew enough. My book Extreme Prejudice goes into the conversations that we had in great detail. And he knew the timing of the attack. By August 2001, Richard was telling me not to go into New York City because this attack was immanent. And on the day of FBI Director Robert Mueller’s confirmation hearings, which I think was August 2nd–in my book it’s very clear, I’ve checked all the dates–Richard Fuisz told me that the attack was immanent. And I said, well, I’m going up to New York to ask my Iraqi sources about this again. And he said “Don’t go to New York, it’s too dangerous, I don’t want you going there again.” And I said “I’m just going up this weekend, and I promise I will not go back to New York.” And that’s how close this was. They knew a great deal. And what was interesting is that after 9/11, I get arrested, and he gets thirteen million dollars in payoffs. (laughs)

Barrett
(laughing) Oh boy. That’s amazing. They arrested you, because they were probably concerned about you revealing the contents of your conversations with Richard, among other things.

Lindauer
Oh yes, absolutely. And the fact that there was a peace option on the table that had been developed over a two year period before the war, a comprehensive peace framework. It included cooperation on anti-terrorism; it included the weapons inspections, of course–you already knew that; and it included Iraq’s commitment to donate economic reconstruction–donate is not the right word–to dedicate economic reconstruction contracts to United States corporations with preferential treatment, preferential contracts in telecommunications, health care, pharmaceuticals, and transportation. This was a comprehensive peace framework! We covered everything! We covered a lot. And nobody even knows about this!

Barrett
That’s amazing. There have been general reports of this nature, including post-9/11, right up to the eve of the invasion, there have been reports that Saddam Hussein was willing to give the US basically everything it wanted to hold off the invasion.

Lindauer
Yes. Yes.

Barrett
That leads to the question: Why do you think, given that you recognize just how insane this invasion was, how completely unnecessary–the Iraqis were caving as far as they had to cave anyway–what was the point?

LindauerYes, literally, Iraq said to me: “What is it the United States wants? Anything that the United States asks for, we will give them. Just tell us what it is!” When I was on a trip to Baghdad, they offered to buy one million American-made automobiles every year for ten years. And (an Iraqi diplomat) said to me, “Look, Susan, if ten years isn’t enough, we’ll make it twenty years.”
Barrett
You know, Susan, you’re kind of ruining Saddam Hussein’s posthumous reputation as somebody who stood up to the U.S.!

Lindauer
He was more harsh on terrorists than we were.

Barrett
He didn’t get along with al-Qaeda, and he didn’t get along with Islamists of any kind, including the Iranians.

Lindauer
That’s right.

Barrett
You would have thought that the U.S. would have just kept running him as an American puppet. He got his start as a CIA hit man, apparently.

Lindauer
Yes indeed.

Barrett
So why, why this insane insistence on going to war with Iraq–a war that has killed one and a half million innocent Iraqis and destroyed that country. What was the purpose of it?

Lindauer
It was so incredibly stupid. And 9/11…9/11 could have been used at the start…9/11 was a tragedy, a terrible, terrible tragedy, but 9/11 could have accomplished great good. Because right after 9/11 Iraq went into high mode of giving. They were offering us everything we wanted: Financial records on al-Qaeda, proof of a Middle Eastern link to what we used to call the inter-Arab group of terrorists, which was actually an amalgamation of several different terrorist factions, coalesced into al-Qaeda. They were willing to prove that there was a Middle Eastern link to the Oklahoma City bombing and the first attack on the World Trade Center, and those included financial documents, bank records…we could have tracked the money that’s financing terrorism around the world. Instead what we do is, we create an enemy. Because it looks better–the politicians could go grandstand. As a former (CIA) asset I can assure you, they don’t actually do anything on terrorism. They give speeches. They go wave their hands in the parades. But they don’t do anything to contribute to anti-terrorism efforts. But the people have been fooled by their showmanship and their grandstanding and their spectacle. It’s like a circus performance now! In fact, before 9/11, there were 200 to 300 terrorists in the world who wanted to attack America. Now, after 9/11 and after the war in Iraq and after the war on Afghanistan, there are only about 2000 to 3000 individuals whose entire focus of life is revenge and coming into the United States and attacking us. That’s only 3000 people. The way I look at it, this is like a high school auditorium that you could fill with the potential terrorists. That’s it! This is an invention! We’ve made this up!

Barrett
Right. Very well put. I’ve often explained to people that there was no real terrorist threat pre-9/11, and that for every one person pre-9/11 who was bent on doing harm to the US, there must be a great many today, because of all the terrible things that have gone on since 9/11.

Lindauer
Yes.

Barrett
So the question then, is…is it just sheer total incompetence and stupidity and grandstanding and egotism–I’m sure all of that contributes to it, but—uh…well, frankly, Susan, my take on all of this is that 9/11 was a Mossad operation, that it was of course done through Cheney’s office. There were no hijackings. The guys that they blamed for it were not terrorists at all. They weren’t even on the planes. There is not a shred of evidence that any of these guys were on those planes, nor is there a shred of actual evidence that there were any hijackings. Instead, we had a military operation that was essentially a Zionist coup d’état by the Likkud faction that wanted to destroy Iraq so it would never be a threat to Israel. A prosperous Iraq, allied to the US, would actually be terrible for Israel. That’s why they wouldn’t take the deals that you were brokering. Care to comment?

Lindauer
I think that you are–I do believe in the hijackings, but I believe in everything else that you have just said. One of the things that came out right after 9/11: I’ve often been asked by people what my CIA handler Richard Fuisz’s source was for the 9/11 attack. And he told me briefly, he let it slip. Immediately after the attack, when we were all in a state of shock, he said to me…the first building had collapsed, but it was before the second building collapsed. This is a very important time frame. He made reference to video tape, which by the way was not released to the publi...il the next day, but right after 9/11 Richard Fuisz already knows about this video tape! Right after the attack–the first building has collapsed, the second one is still standing–and we’re both talking in the living room, we’re both shouting–I’m in my living room, he’s in his living room, and we’re shouting at the televisions–and he blurts out to me: “Susan, how many times do you think a camera is cued up waiting for a car accident to occur?” He said, “What do you think are the odds that those two people were just standing on the sidewalk with a video camera waiting patiently for the plane to hit the building?” And he said, “Those are Mossad agents. They knew that the World Trade Center was about to get hit, and they were waiting there for it to happen so they could record it and put it out in the media.” Now this is before it has even come out in the media. He identifies them as Mossad agents, and I believe–I’m convinced–that that was the source of our knowledge of al-Qaeda. But what you guys don’t know, which I will throw out to you, which comes out in my book, is that from April and May of 2001 onwards, Richard Fuisz instructed me to threaten the Iraqis with war. Now everybody assumes that the war stuff came after 9/11. But it didn’t. They had decided months before 9/11 ever happened that as soon as this attack occurred, this would be the motivation for the war. So they absolutely knew that this attack was coming. They knew that it was going to be in late August or September. And that opens up a whole new dynamic proving what you have just said: That it was a Mossad conspiracy, that there was complicity…maybe that’s a better word, complicity…I’m going to go a little softer on the language than you. Mossad complicity.

Barrett
I would argue that it’s a little more than complicity–that the demolitions of the three tallest buildings ever taken down in controlled demolitions required immense skill and military specialization and so on…

Lindauer
Oh yes, when I say complicity, I include that in it. Yes. I believe in the detonations. In fact…do I have time to tell you one story before break?

Barrett
Tell it, go for it.

Lindauer
While I was writing my book, I had a high-ranking State Department official, who has a very very high, top-top-top security classification, and I cannot name him for you because I don’t want to hurt his reputation. He’s close to retirement, he’s going to have a pension–they would crush him if he was ever exposed, I suspect. He thinks it too. He says that a couple of weeks before 9/11, at the end of August, for about two weeks, strange vans were arriving at the World Trade Center at three o’ clock in the morning. They were staying from about three o’ clock to about four-thirty or five. They were coming in for a brief period. And he swore to me that he personally had investigated the janitorial services, and he said “I know first hand how many employees the janitorial service had, what their trucks looked like, what their revenues were like, where they lived.” He said “we know the addresses.” We are confident that none of the people from the janitorial services were tied to these trucks. It had never happened before, it was a unique thing. This was not a constant thing like over a six month period. It was a strange anomaly right before (the attack on) the World Trade Center. And he was convinced that this was government-level thermite, government-level weapons, that had been put into either the stairwells or the elevator shafts. And he is convinced that this is when it happened.

Note: To get the rest of the story, you need to purchase her book entitled: "Extreme Prejudice."

30,000 scientists sue Al Gore??

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 03:53:00 +0000

I really think that the global warming needs some open debate. Regardless of whether it is human caused or not it has certainly fueled the search for new and cleaner technologies, and sustainable technologies. So, in a sense it is having a good impact and these advances in environmental technologies and applications should be continued even if climate change is not human caused.

In any case, stifling dissent is not a good thing. I am for freedom of expression even if the viewpoint may go against the prevailing opinions especially if it is 30,000 scientists.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6zpHtbM3hc&feature=related

$.510 Vote Can End Food Freedom Forever

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 24 Nov 2010 02:58:00 +0000

$.510 Vote Can End Food Freedom Forever Unless We Stop the Industrialization of Food Through Our Push Back!

URGENT: Take the UPDATED Action Item (AGAIN or For the First Time)

Email Your Senators Here and Spread the Word:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4613

The Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation wish you peace, joy, prosperity and health this Thanksgiving. We wish you something more: Freedom.

Henry Kissinger famously said "Control oil and you control the nations; control food and you control the people" That is precisely what is at stake. Imagine: an America in which a 6 year old child is busted for selling lemonaide! We have already arrived there.

Search "6 year old busted lemonaide" and you will find dozens of times that it's already happened. Search "Farmer's Market Raided" and you will find hundreds of examples. "Organic Coop Raided"? Hundreds. "Raw Milk Seized"? Even more. And that's BEFORE $.510.

What will it be like AFTER $.510, Big Agribiz/Big Biotech/Big Chema are eager to help you find out. It is widely believed that Monsanto's Michael Taylor (Obama's "Food Safety" Czar) wrote this horrific legislation. It gives the Uber Cartel virtually everything they can ask for: total control of the market, elimination of all competition, a lap dog regulatory agency to do its bidding and whitewash the whited supulchur created for it by this disastrous law, the legal (but not lawful) means to stifle dissent with bogus charges like "food smuggling" to keep people from growing their own food and "smuggling" it into the US Corporation, that boundariless "State" which the US has become, and criminalize literally anything or any activity that gets in its way.

Is that what you want? Well, it is exactly what the Senate of the United States is ready to hand to that generous, open-handed (at least to them!) Uber Cartel which bribes and controls them so that the US Senate is ready to do their bidding.

I do not know about you, but I am ready for the Senate to do MY bidding. They work for ME and it is their responsibility to protect and extend MY freedoms, not those of their corporate donors.

Secret: the Senators to whom we are sending these emails in such large numbers do not read them. But they tally them! That's what counts. Give them something serious to tally. Let's add another 250,000 emails to the ones we have already sent and make it a round million.

With group after group (we've lost count of how many now) taking action, writing what we have written (often just cutting and pasting from our blasts), the Senate is being beseiged, which is exactly what we want.

So give thanksgiving for the fact that you still have the internet, still have the right to beseige your Senators and do it. Now. Then do it again for each member of your household. And then write to everyone you can reach, call talk show hosts, write letters to the Editor and urge EVERYONE to click the freedom mouse over and over and over between now and the moment when we either save our country, our freedom, our food and, ultimately, our lives, or we do not.

There is no one else to whom the choice belongs. It truly belongs to you and you alone. Choose well.

URGENT: Take the UPDATED Action Item (AGAIN or For the First Time)

Email Your Senators Here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4613

Here is the history of the past few weeks
AND LINKS TO UPDATED TALKING POINTS
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?p=7446

URGENT: Take the UPDATED Action Item (AGAIN or For the First Time)

Email Your Senators Here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=4613

PLEASE contact your Senators at their home State offices... or if you know them, call them at home or talk to them over the Thanksgiving Table. Let them know that a vast and growing transpartisan alliance of health & food freedom advocates, framers, ranchers, gardeners, tea partiers and others have sent millions of messages to Congress:

SENATOR: VOTE "NO!" ON $.510!

Gold standard?

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 02:17:00 +0000

The president of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, wrote yesterday in a Financial Times article that leading world economies should consider “employing gold as an international reference point of market expectations about inflation, deflation and future currency values.”

Some believe this COULD lead to a confiscation of gold bullion and coins in the US. Be careful. I suggest considering getting gold in smaller denominations and holding it in storage. Learn more about that here: http://www.twelfth-step.com/kbgold.html

Could gold go to $15,000 an Ounce? Some think so...

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:46:00 +0000

The small group of gold enthusiasts who started out few in numbers a few years back has made a parabolic move over the past year or so much like their projections for the future price of gold. They now number an unbelievable 108 who have stated, with sound reasons in their opinions, why gold could quite possibly go to a parabolic top of at least $2,500 an ounce – to even as much as an unimaginable $15,000 – before the bubble finally pops! In fact, the majority (65) maintain that $5,000 or more for gold is likely.

In this article I identify the economists, academics, analysts and financial writers who hold such a lofty opinion of the prospects for gold and provide the URLs of their articles so you can ascertain for yourself their logic for such parabolic moves in the years to come.

Click HERE to read the whole article...

More Hilarity

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:32:00 +0000

I had to post this tongue in cheek response from my dad in Australia!

After reading the last post on vaccines he says:

Hi,

My name is Allen Nash, an eighty year old who has been vaccinated at least 75 times in my life. I have been on flu shots for the last 20 years, and as yet have not died, nor caught the flu, and at 80 am hale and hearty.

But thanks for your advice and information anyway.

Regards

Allen Nash

A Friend of Health Freedom Writes to Diane Feinstein...

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 05:51:00 +0000

Sometimes Health Freedom Is Just Plain Hilarious!

A good friend of health freedom wrote to Diane Feinstein (D CA) about his flu vaccine concerns. He received the predictable form letter containing such idiocy as ...

"Several studies have been conducted, by the CDC and other agencies, in response to concerns that thimerosal, a mercury-containing component of the influenza vaccine, is linked to autism. These studies did not find such a link, noting that the amount of thimerosal in the vaccine was too low to have an effect. One study found that, even after thimerosal was removed from vaccines in Denmark, the rate of autism in children continued to rise.

The influenza vaccine is the safest, most effective method of preventing the spread of a disease which, according to the CDC, leads to an average of 36,000 deaths each year. Please know that I will keep your thoughts in mind should legislation regarding the influenza vaccine come before the Senate.

   Sincerely yours,
   Dianne Feinstein
   United States Senator"

Our articulate friend wrote back to her a letter which I now share with you with thanks to him for his activism, his passion and his sharing of this exchange.

"Dear Diane,

   Thank you so much for your email regarding the use of the deadly mercury in the H1N1 vaccine and other injections given even to newborn babies with no regard to the long term neurological consequences and the damage that will be done to millions of families across our country and around the world. I appreciate your need to do all you can for the reputation of the WTO, after their complete exposure as a fraudulent organization when they issued a pandemic alert of the highest level last year (level 6) in order to convince (or coerce) millions of people to take the toxic vaccines.

   I sympathize with you that the otherwise well-coordinated scam did not work, and the "pandemic" had to be canceled, with millions of unused injections sitting on the shelves, waiting for a pandemic to be created fast enough to use them before they have to be thrown away. No one realizes how hard the poor drug dealers work with their government servants to pull off one of these global scams, and how much hard-extorted money they lose when one does not work. Actually, though, since the government bought the injectable drugs from them, there is fortunately no loss to the drug dealers themselves, but only to the American public, since this was a taxpayer expense.

   As far as your reassurance that CDC and FDA have made sure these toxins are really good and healthy for us to inject into our bodies, thank you that makes me feel so much better. I realize that as a busy senator, you have no spare time to waste on things like learning what the CDC and the FDA are, or that they are fully controlled by and take their orders from, the drug companies. Later, when you are retired, perhaps you can take the time to study these things, instead of just repeating what you have been told. If you eventually become honest, and perhaps develop a conscience, you will find that the current "health care" system, overseen and controlled by the respectable drug lords that you know as "pharmaceutical companies" has become the number two cause of death in American today (something like 750,000 deaths a year from "properly" used drugs).

   I look forward to the time you become interested in what good you could actually do for the people you are supposed to represent. There is still time for you to drop the party and political nonsense, and take up humility, honesty, and a sincere interest in truth instead. Millions of us are waiting for that time and wishing you well in getting there.

   In the meantime, if you ever develop any curiosity to see the real data on vaccines, take a look at:

www.homefirst.com, and www.healthfreedomusa.org, and numerous others which are not connected to the vast "health care" drug machine. The information is rock solid, science based, and will amaze you if you allow yourself to learn.

    [Name Redacted at Writer's Request]"

Rawesome Foods Raided

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:49:00 +0000

(NaturalNews) On June 30, 2010, a group of armed government agents from local, state, federal and even the Canadian government illegally trespassed on private property and raided Rawesome Foods, a private food buying club in Venice, California. With guns drawn, these agents tore through the property stealing computers, raw dairy products and honey, all while holding some of the volunteer workers hostage for several hours. When the agents finally left, they took with them thousands of dollars in private property as well as the surveillance footage of their armed rampage.

Sounds like a scene out of a horror movie, right? Except this actually happened, though unless you're tuned in to the health freedom movement, you've probably heard nothing about it. Most of the mainstream media outlets would never touch a story like this because it exposes just how tyrannical and out of control our government has become on issues like raw milk and food freedom.

Many of the details in this story haven't been published before. Read the full article at:
http://www.naturalnews.com/030136_Rawesome_foods_raid.html

Do Drug Firm Bribery Charges Implicate the U.S. FDA?

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Fri, 22 Oct 2010 06:00:00 +0000

How can anyone have implicit faith in the science and products produced by BIG Pharma when The Wall Street Journal on October 5, 2010 featured the article “Drug Firms Face Bribery Probe” by Michael Rothfeld?
That question automatically should be followed with, “Will those charges also implicate the U.S. FDA?” Not knowing all the facts, but being of a suspicious nature, I’d say anything is possible given the long-term revolving door policy that seems to exist within government agencies, Big Pharma, and the chemical industry. This is where the U.S. Congress, in my opinion, has been—and continues to be—remiss in its oversight duties.
If one studies pharmaceutical demographics, as I have for years, one readily realizes that starting in the 1980s, Big Pharma companies began their push and drive to manage healthcare via their products by using what many feel are scare tactics in media advertising and unreliable science—something that the FDA apparently condones and even seems to parrot.

Read all HERE

Dr. Horowitz Exposes Dr. Oz H1N1 Fraud

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:34:00 +0000

"The educated differ from the uneducated as much as the living from the dead." -- Aristotle

A typical example of Dr. Horowitz's razor sharp encyclopedic knowledge & understanding...

(in the process of exposing this Dr Oz as bought and paid for...)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04gaxcrVRxY&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MerH7ZU22Qo&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6e0JpG0l0U&feature=related

and read up on all the related links there in your spare time...

This could be about saving someone's life. So, please 'Like' it on YouTube IF you like it and and hit the share buttons to get this out. More people need to wake up to the Medical Mafia and their machinations.

HOROWITZ ON COAST-TO-COAST,

TUES, OCT. 19, 10PM PACIFIC TIME;

GEORGE NOORY INTERVIEW 3 HOURS

DON'T MISS THIS RIVETING 3-HOUR SPECIAL FEATURING "WHY 'THEY' WANT TO 'SHUT HOROWITZ UP'!"

In 2009, after becoming the first doctor in the world to charge the World Health Organization with fraud in the Swine Flu "manufactured pandemic," Dr. Leonard Horowitz learned of an organized plan to assassinate him. He, along with investigative journalist, Sherri Kane, then exposed the agents and agencies responsible for the murder plot.

This historic show explains why Horowitz, and his natural healing recommendations, represent the greatest threat to established medicine, and its satanic directors, in HISTORY.

Brief Bio:

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz is an internationally known authority in the overlapping fields of public health, behavioral science, emerging diseases, and natural healing. He began his career as an anatomy instructor and researcher on the faculties of Tufts and Harvard Universities, respectively; becoming a dentist, periodontal surgeon, behavioral scientist, award-winning film-maker and author of 16 books on the risks of medicine versus benefits of natural healing. (See "Career Highlights") below.

This Coast-to-Coast Special Tells It ALL. . . .

Dr. Horowitz is expected to discuss:

Hour 1: 10-11PM PST, Tuesday Night, Oct. 19, 2010

1) The medical establishment's greatest weakness;

2) Why the vaccination paradigm is dangerously flawed;

3) Why he views modern medicine as "barbaric;"

4) What made Dr. H. believe the 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu Pandemic a fraud;

5) Why Dr. Horowitz latest film, PharmaWhores: The SHOWTIME Sting of Penn & Teller, in which conflicting interests between drug-makers and the most powerful media moguls are featured, prompted a CIA/FBI "COINTELPRO" assassination plot against his life;

6) Who is really behind the plot to assassinate Horowitz?

7) What lessons can be learned from exposing those responsible for assassinating journalists, especially independent journalists.

Hour 2: 11PM-12AM PST, Tuesday Night/Wednesday Morning, Oct. 19/20, 2010

8) Dr. Horowitz's plan for bringing people together worldwide as the antidote to the trouble-makers.

9) Dr. Horowitz's celebration of Healthy World Organization, a alternative to the corrupt World Health Organization, and a support store cooperative, HealthyWorldAffiliates.com.

10) The doctor's " 5-Steps" for natural, even "miraculous," healing.

11) The sacredness of water, why it is essential for natural healing, and what kind of water to drink

12) Natural remedies, herbs, vitamins, even silver products are being increasingly regulated, and access to these products is being increasingly restricted. What you can do about this?

13) Why replace toxic antibiotics and risky vaccinations with simple mineral water, OxySilver, resonating with 528Hz frequency.

Hour 3: 12AM-1AM PST, /Wednesday Morning, Oct. 20, 2010

14) What people need that government health care never provides.

15) Why the future of medicine lies in "hydrosonic science."

16) How DNA functions in natural healing through hydro-creationism.

17) Explaining "miraculous healings" in terms of electrogenetics, hydrocreationism, or what the religious world calls the power of the Holy Spirit to cure you.

18) Evidence for the "Spiritual Renaissance" unfolding to heal people and our planet, naturally, and how this is changing established medicine.

19) How to more fully engage the "Spiritual Renaissance."

20) The three keys to gaining spiritual protection.

21) Knowing, and celebrating, the greatest secreted truth in history.

Pat Buchanan Is Wrong About Islam

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Fri, 10 Sep 2010 02:09:00 +0000

by Fred Reed

Much hoorah, there is, over the mosque that may or may not be built in New York. I don't give a tinker's damn (whatever precisely that may be; I presume that tinkers' oaths were thought more efficacious than others) whether they build it or not. The matter does however put to rest for me any hope of rationality in human affairs. This, I grant, could be accomplished with a very small bed.

At this writing, the government's war for oil and AIPAC has more or less solidly metamorphosed, among the rubes at least, into a war against Islam. Men of thunder and portent peddle the notion like starving encyclopedia salesmen. No less a political howitzer than Pat Buchanan says that the mosque should not be built, because of the religious motivation of the Saudis who attacked the towers. His view has been eagerly received by the populace. Now it seems that yahoos at some fourth-grade church in Florida plan to burn a Koran to commemorate 9/11.

Splendid, this. We are telling 1.3 billion Moslems that America is not fighting Al Qaeda, or the Taliban, or Terror. No. It is Islam itself we hate. How very wise. This will make it so much easier to win hearts and minds in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Those security forces that GIs are supposed to be training - the ones with the AKs - they will know that their trainers are their enemies. Curiously, this is just what bin Laden tells them.

Glands again trump minds, if any. Consider that ten minutes before the first tower got hit in New York, the thought had occurred to practically no one in America that Islam constituted a mortal threat to all that we hold holy, chiefly chain restaurants and iPods. But Islam afterwards offered to fill this void that the Russians had wimped out on. For a brief period after the implosion of the Soviet Union, Americans had no threat to worry about. They found it deeply puzzling. Weren't we supposed to be afraid of something? It didn't feel right.

Then came New York, and suddenly we saw it: The Clash of Civilizations. Islam was out to get us. Why hadn't we noticed? A roaring hatred for Moslems sprang up from people who had never met a Moslem, who had a garden slug's grasp of history. A deep satisfaction came over the land. We had been made whole again.

Battling Mohammedans quickly became an industry. The government at first tried to peddle Terrorism as the enemy, not Islam, but it didn't stick. Something more robustly flackable was wanted.

I find Buchanan, of the American Conservative, proclaiming that Islam is a Culture of Jihad, and most militant. No doubt. Very. Would it be poltroonish of me to note that just now Christian armies are busily annexing and wrecking Afghanistan and Iraq, having recently bombed Somalia? That they use robotic aircraft to murder Yemenis, that they hunt down Moslems in the Philippines (where after 1898 Americans engaged in atrocities that would win the admiration of the Japanese), encourage Israel to ruin Lebanon and to run a concentration camp for Moslems in Gaza, enthusiastically murder Pakistanis from the sky, and threaten Syria and Iran?

Those Moslems. Militant, they are. The bastards.

The Islamic countries listed above are only those currently attacked by America. Let us look at the matter in another way. I append here a list of all Christian countries conquered by militant Moslems since 1529:

Next, a partial list of Moslem countries conquered by Christians: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Sudan, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq (the first time), Iraq (again), Iran, Pakistan, East Pakistan, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Yemen, Oman, Abu Dhabi, Dubai....

This list does not include such minor Christian conquests as North, South, and Central America, India, China, Southeast Asia, black Africa, and such. Unconscionable, Moslem aggressiveness is.

Buchanan regards the events of 9/11 as no end grievous. So do I. Yet perhaps people who live in glass pots and kettles shouldn't call names. The UN's figures give 600,000 Iraqi children dead because of the American embargo, which didn't allow, for example, chlorine to sterilize water. This is equivalent to 6.4 million dead children in the United States. Hmmm: If Moslems had killed this trifling number of our sprats, might we wax grumpish?

Yes, I know, the UN is a commie Marxist socialist anti-American conspiracy, and not as trustworthy as the American propaganda apparatus. All right. Let's assume that the UN lied by a factor of ten, and thus only 60,000 Iraqi children died thanks to us. Thus, if 3,000 Americans died in New York, we owe the Moslems some 57,000. No?

If I may sally briefly into unloved seriousness: What puzzles me, as one who has lived extensively abroad, is how little Americans are able to see things through the eyes of others, how little empathy they have (this latter defect being characteristic of both psychopaths and narcissists).

Consider a headline from Antiwar.com of a sort appearing almost daily: "US Drone Strike Destroys House Full of Children in Pakistan."

Apparently no one in the Great Rubber Room north of Mexico has an inkling why this might arouse hatred in Pakistanis. Can you imagine the fury that would ensue if a Moslem blew up a house full of American kids in, say, Queens? But when we kill their kids, no one cares. "Yeah, well. Tough. Giv'em a few dollars." Buncha dirty raghead larvae. No better than cockroaches, right?

Now, we're going to have a pop quiz. Take out a sheet of paper. Question: Can you think of any reason why Moslems might be unhappy with America?
Right! They hate our freedoms.

In which case they daily have less to hate us for.

It doesn't pay to underestimate an enemy, I hear. All right: Moslems are so very dangerous not just because of their many extremist groups - Salamists, Al Sushis, the Falafel, and the Wasabi for example - but because of their immense industrial strength, which doesn't exist. With the possible exception of Turkey, not one Islamic nation is in the First World. I picture bearded, turbaned warriors wading ashore on aquatic camels, causing no end of panic in Atlantic City. I mean, what do camels eat?

The horror.

Herewith a searing insight for the ever-puzzled State Department: Actions have consequences. If you support Batista, you will engender Fidel. If you support the Shah, you will get Khomeini. If you attack Moslems, you will get bin Laden. It might be better to stay home and read a book.

September 9, 2010

Fred Reed is author of Nekkid in Austin: Drop Your Inner Child Down a Well and A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A Thing I Aspire to Be. His latest book is Curmudgeing Through Paradise: Reports from a Fractal Dung Beetle. Visit his blog.

Chem Trails Demystified

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:55:00 +0000

Chemtrails Demystified by and Insider.

Very Interesting Interview with AC Griffith...

Listen especially to Part 3, Something to be aware of....

Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udEtOc2IFO8&NR=1
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4c0FRYqlJQ
Part 3
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=ex+government+employee+talks+about+chemtrails+part+3&aq=f
Part 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MS9MPcUNkc
Part 5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfIKLGuLtuA

Aerosol crime is also known as chem trails as distinguished from con trails.

This is an insider's perspective on the program. It is must listen and will make you look at the skies a lot differently after this interview.

Apple Spyware

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Sun, 05 Sep 2010 02:01:00 +0000

Steve Jobs Is Watching You:

Apple Seeking to Patent Spyware Deeplink

It looks like Apple, Inc., is exploring a new business opportunity:
spyware and what we're calling "traitorware." While users were
celebrating the new jailbreaking and unlocking exemptions, Apple was
quietly preparing to apply for a patent on technology that, among
other things, would allow Apple to identify and punish users who take
advantage of those exemptions or otherwise tinker with their devices.
This patent application does nothing short of providing a roadmap for
how Apple can, and presumably will, spy on its customers and control
the way its customers use Apple products. As Sony-BMG learned, spying
on your customers is bad for business. And the kind of spying enabled
here is especially creepy, it's not just spyware, it's "traitorware,"
since it is designed to allow Apple to retaliate against you if you do
something Apple doesn't like.

Essentially, Apple's patent provides for a device to investigate a
user's identity, ostensibly to determine if and when that user is
"unauthorized," or, in other words, stolen. More specifically, the
technology would allow Apple to record the voice of the device's user,
take a photo of the device's user's current location or even detect
and record the heartbeat of the device's user. Once an unauthorized
user is identified, Apple could wipe the device and remotely store the
user's "sensitive data." Apple's patent application suggests it may
use the technology not just to limit "unauthorized" uses of its phones
but also shut down the phone if and when it has been stolen.

However, Apple's new technology would do much more. This patented
device enables Apple to secretly collect, store and potentially use
sensitive biometric information about you. This is dangerous in two
ways: First, it is far more than what is needed just to protect you
against a lost or stolen phone. It's extremely privacy-invasive and
it puts you at great risk if Apple's data on you are compromised. But
it's not only the biometric data that are a concern. Second, Apple's
technology includes various types of usage monitoring, also very
privacy-invasive. This patented process could be used to retaliate
against you if you jailbreak or tinker with your device in ways that
Apple views as "unauthorized" even if it is perfectly legal under
copyright law.

Here's a sample of the kinds of information Apple plans to collect:
The system can take a picture of the user's face, "without a flash,
any noise, or any indication that a picture is being taken to prevent
the current user from knowing he is being photographed"; The system
can record the user's voice, whether or not a phone call is even being
made; The system can determine the user's unique individual heartbeat
"signature"; To determine if the device has been hacked, the device
can watch for "a sudden increase in memory usage of the electronic
device"; The user's "Internet activity can be monitored or any
communication packets that are served to the electronic device can be
recorded"; and The device can take a photograph of the surrounding
location to determine where it is being used.

In other words, Apple will know who you are, where you are, and what
you are doing and saying and even how fast your heart is beating. In
some embodiments of Apple's "invention," this information "can be
gathered every time the electronic device is turned on, unlocked, or
used." When an "unauthorized use" is detected, Apple can contact a
"responsible party." A "responsible party" may be the device's owner,
it may also be "proper authorities or the police."

Apple does not explain what it will do with all of this collected
information on its users, how long it will maintain this information,
how it will use this information, or if it will share this information
with other third parties. We know based on long experience that if
Apple collects this information, law enforcement will come for it, and
may even order Apple to turn it on for reasons other than simply
returning a lost phone to its owner.

This patent is downright creepy and invasive, certainly far more than
would be needed to respond to the possible loss of a phone. Spyware,
and its new cousin traitorware, will hurt customers and companies
alike, Apple should shelve this idea before it backfires on both it
and its customers.

Author Unknown (please send if you know)

Note of Caution from Tony Robbins

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Wed, 18 Aug 2010 00:32:00 +0000

This is a very important message from Tony Robbins. It confirms much of what many in the know have been saying the last few months. A good friend of mine shared this with and I thought you should hear this warning.

http://www.metatube.com/en/videos/37911/An-Important-Note-Of-Caution-By-Tony-Robbins/

Fluoride Poison...

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Mon, 16 Aug 2010 03:21:00 +0000

Another good reason to get an alkalizing ionic water machine.

To think that only Canada, the US, Canada, and perhaps a few other countries are feeding toxic fluoride into the water supply while almost all of Europe does not allow it is quite interesting. Now they want to add this toxic industrial waste product to the Australian water system.

Very revealing facts you probably don't know about Fluoride and it is not JUST in your water.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GzA_h5YuE8w&feature=feedu

Medical Truth?

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Thu, 12 Aug 2010 00:11:00 +0000

PH Miracles...

How many more medical lies have to be perpetuated before we stand up for the truth? How many more people need to be poisoned with antibiotics, vaccinations and other cancer causing pharmaceuticals until we stand up and say "Enough!"? How many more children’s lives need to be destroyed before we take a stand? Please help save a life by passing this information on…

Harvard University and National Cancer Research Journals now confirm that ONE Aspirin or Tylenol each day will cause up to an 80% increased risk of Cancer and Heart Disease.
Take ONE 50 mg. pill of Vioxx for 5 days? A study undertaken two years ago showed that this increases the chances of getting coronary artery disease by 70%. Lancet Oct 5, 2002
A University of Washington study found that if you filled 25 or more prescriptions for antibiotics over 17 years, you double your risk of cancer (TIME, Dec. 6, 2004) This equates into taking less than ONE antibiotic each year, an activity in which almost every American participates.
Infants exposed to ONE single round of antibiotics during their first years of life are twice as likely to develop asthma as those who don’t. The more courses of antibiotics, the worse the immunity and the greater the risk of asthma. (Newsday, March 6, 2006)
Take ONE Benadryl for your allergies, and here are your possible side-effects: Difficulty breathing, closing of your throat, swelling of your lips, tongue, or face, hives, sleepiness, fatigue, dizziness, headache, dry mouth, difficulty urinating, enlarged prostate and a dramatic reduction in energy.
Take ONE aspirin per day? Daily aspirin intake shows a significantly increased risk of pancreatic cancer among women. This cancer is fatal 90% of the time. Source: American Association for Cancer Research, October 27, 2003
Take just ONE Crestor pill/day to lower your cholesterol? This drug has been shown to cause 75 times the level of kidney damage than other statin drugs. Public Citizen Oct 29, 2004
ONE vaccination can leave your child with brain damage or worse a form of Autism: Children are 27 times more likely to develop autism when exposed to vaccines containing mercury: Lori McIlwain, National Autism Association, (919) 272-8192/ Studies suggest that there is a link between neuro-developmental disorders, such as autism, and mercury exposure from thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines. Centers for Disease Control, Jan. 16, 2004.
Taking just ONE pain killer can cause death. There are over 16,500 deaths from NSAIDs (Pain Killers) each year in the hospitals alone. JAMA July 26, 2000 Vol. 284. Just as many die from AIDS each year!
Thinking of taking a cough suppressant or giving to your child just ONE time: cough suppressant is linked to Birth Defects: Dextromethorphan, the major ingredient in most OTC cough medicines, has been shown to cause birth defects. Source: Pediatric Research January 1998:43:1-7
Taking cold medications like Robitussin, Triaminic, PediaCare, Comtrex, etc. just ONE time can cause stroke, brain bleeding, and seizures. This year the F.D.A. completely banned these cold medications for adults and children, especially under the age of 6.
L. A. Times states: Antibiotics aren’t the answer to treating sinus infections: “The widespread use of standard antibiotics to treat sinus infections does not help cure patients and taking just ONE round may harm them by increasing their resistance to the drugs.

Below is more truth is it applies to some of the most commonly ingested pharmaceuticals in the world

1. Acetaminophen (Tylenol) use is the number-one reason for acute liver failure in the United States. It is also responsible for 8 percent to 10 percent of the end-stage renal disease in the U.S. The New England Journal of Medicine December 20, 2001; 345:1801-1808. Hepatology Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 6 – 9. Published Online: 30 Jun 2004, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

2. In 2004, the American Academy of Pediatricians reversed its guidelines, pointing out that in more than 80 percent of the children with ear infections, symptoms would subside on their own, without the need for antibiotics.

3. DO NOT take antibiotics or any of the above drugs without the facts!

4. The flu shot and childhood vaccines can be deadly. We have been told to get flu shots that contain mercury, formaldehyde, aluminum and many other dangerous chemicals! Now according to the Vaccine Journal, they said, “flu vaccines offer no protection and have never saved any lives.” *Mercury!!! 2nd most dangerous substance on earth. Destroys the nervous system and immune system. Associated with Multiple Sclerosis, Central Nervous System Disorders, Autism and Alzheimer's Disease!*Ethylene glycol (antifreeze) Exposure to ethylene glycol can damage the kidneys, heart, and nervous system.*Phenol (disinfectant) Exposure to phenol can produce skin burns, liver damage, dark urine, irregular heartbeat, and even death.*Formaldehyde (known cancer causing agent) *Neomycin and Streptomycin (antibiotics) *Aluminum associated with Alzheimer's disease and seizures and also cancer producing in laboratory mice. Is this something you want to inject directly into your blood or your childr en’s?

5. The flu vaccine is manufactured to fight the flu from 2 years previous, so it is IMPOSSIBLE for this year’s flu vaccine to protect you against this year’s exact strain of circulating flu virus!

6. According to Hugh Fudenburg, MD, one of the world’s premier immunogeneticists, the chance of getting Alzheimer’s is ten times higher if an individual has had 5 consecutive flu shots(this is due to the Mercury). Dr. Fudenburg is the 13th most quoted biologist in the world today.

7. A British Medical Journal shows the medical profession to only be about 4% scientific. http://www.vet-task-force.com/CtiM.htm

“Our drugs don’t work.” Dr. Allen Roses, worldwide vice-president of Genetics at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Britain’s giant pharmaceutical company, acknowledged at a scientific meeting in London that fewer than half of the patients prescribed some of the most expensive drugs actually derived any benefit from them.

Source:
http://www.phmiracleliving.com/htmlmail/2010/pHe8_10.html

The Real Goods on Water

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:07:00 +0000

Here is an amazing call by two medical professionals. One gave up her ionized water machine business to get the word out on ionized water and its benefits. As a representative there were things she could not say without the FTC coming down on her.

Now that she is independent and not a rep for ANY of the water machine companies out there now you can get the substantiated independent FACTS about this water.

She can now tell you a lot more than a distributor can tell you without be charged for practicing medicine without a license! This is a powerful and revealing call. Get the facts without bias and find out why ionized water is going to create a health revolution.

DR. PEGGY PARKER'S RECORDED CALL

http://www. simplehealthnetwork.com/ replay/july12-2010.html

These people are selling nothing nor are they being bought by anyone. Rather, they are wanting to awaken people worldwide to the healing effects of this water.

Have a listen, it could change your life...for the better.

Curing Cancer with Baking Soda

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Tue, 04 May 2010 01:41:00 +0000

Curing Cancer with Baking Soda:

What MD’s and Naturopaths Don’t Know

by Gregory Delaney

Wouldn’t the delusional physicians and the big pharmacology swindlers be embarrassed to find that cancer could be cured with nothing more complicated than ordinary baking soda? Well, no, they wouldn’t be embarrassed because they would be outraged. All of their billions in profits vanishing in a twinkle, would not have these betrayers of Mankind at all happy with such a simple cancer cure. And yet, cancer can be cured with nothing more complicated than ordinary baking soda. And I will explain how.

While the greedy physicians and the cancer industry robber barons have been using every imaginable method for treating the symptoms of cancer, and while millions of people have suffered and died under the most astounding variety of mechanical, chemical, bio-technological and radiological absurdities, little progress in curing cancer has actually been made. And why? Well, to understand why, you would have to understand who is treating cancer before you can understand why it is not being cured. Who are these cancer physicians who claim to know so much yet fail to do anything useful?

Firstly, they are people who admit that they don’t know the cause of cancer or how to cure it. And yet they insist that they be allowed to “practice medicine” anyway! These oncologists admit that no matter what they do, you are going to die anyway, and so why not let them do something since they can make better use of your money than you can. Even though they admit that they don’t know what they are doing, they offer you just two (and only two) choices: (1) let them cut-poison-irradiate-and-transplant you which includes a free estimation of how long you will live or (2) do nothing at all which also includes a free, but much shorter, estimation of how long you will live. And so, with such limited choices, most people prefer to bequeath their savings account to the doctors for choice number one. At best, the physicians promise to drug you into unconsciousness so that you do not feel any pain either from your tumors or from their billing department.

But what happens if you don’t take their advice and choose alternative medicine, instead – you know, the choice that the doctors never mention to their patients? Since it has been proven that hospital patients live longer when the doctors go on strike, then alternative medicine is obviously better than a placebo. But they never mention that, either.

Secondly, these oncologists with all of their fancy degrees and years of microscopic confusion are really nothing more than disciples of fraud. This fraud is known as “symptomatic medicine”. And these cancer physicians prove their idiocy on a daily basis by classifying cancer as a “disease”. Would it be a joke on them if it was discovered that cancer really is not a disease at all but merely a “symptom” of something else? Hundreds of millions of dying cancer patients would certainly not be laughing. And millions of billionaire Big Pharma swindlers would not be laughing, either. Would it be a joke if it was discovered that cancer is not a disease at all and that these swindling greed-bags were actually mistaking the symptoms for the disease? I don’t think there would be much laughter in finding this to be true; but it is true. And here’s how this simple cure works.

The cancer quacks who are known as “modern physicians” (or oncology engineers), all know that there are many things that cause cancer. Does this ring a bell in their mighty brains? No, of course not. If there are many things that cause cancer, then how can cancer be classified as a disease? Isn’t it true, rather, that the many causative agents are the disease while the manifestations of tumors and malignancies are actually the symptom? This may seem strange but think about it a bit. And you alternative practitioners had better think about it a bit since the physicians have already proven that they are on the wrong track and haven’t thought about it enough.

If many things cause cancer (radiation, chemicals, viruses, sunlight, etc.) then even the dumbest physician knows enough to remove the primary cause. So, patients who work in the bright sun or in chemical factories are advised to avoid these situations. Hooray for the doctors who have common sense! But why are they so few?

Once you remove the primal cause, you are still left with a growing malignancy. (I am referring to the growing tumor and not to the doctors and the Big Pharma executives, themselves.) This cancerous growth has certain attributes that the idiot doctors overlook because they have been trained to use the most expensive methods possible for producing the largest possible profit for themselves and for their hospitals and for their drug suppliers. And after extracting all possible savings accounts, checking accounts, real property and insurance benefits, they send the dying patient home after saying, “We have done everything that we can do.” No, I don’t think many people will be laughing to discover that cancer can be cured with baking soda.

But even after the primary cause of the cancer is removed, why do the cancer cells keep growing? The doctors say because cancer is a disease. However, these practitioners of “symptomatic medicine” are mistaking the disease for the symptom. It is more accurate to say that the cancer is not the disease, itself, but is rather the symptom.

The maniac oncologists cut and radiate and poison and burn the cancer cells in an attempt to kill them. But the alternative practitioner prefers to let the powerful defenses of the body do all the work. And why? Because the body can take care of itself just fine as long as you provide it with what it needs to do the necessary healing. In this case, first remove the causative factors of cancer (such as the oncologists and Big Pharma robber barons) and then get to work on the underlying causes.

All cancer has some common denominators that the physicians think are inconsequential. But if you think about it a little bit, you will see that the oncologists are full of themselves and not full of knowledge. What they think is the disease, is actually the symptom. And what they think is inconsequential is actually the tiny, little cause for all of this suffering and disease. It’s a joke on the doctors, but nobody is laughing.

Here’s how it works. Normal cells that turn cancerous have specific jobs to do. Brain cells do brainy things, heart cells are on a bungee-jumper’s rush, liver cells strain today’s whiskey, kidney cells strain the beer and save the water, bladder cells hold the nasty stuff that the others strain, and skin cells enjoy a good suntan on a summer day. They all do different jobs. But when they turn cancerous, they throw all of that specialization aside.

Cancer cells do not evolve; they devolve. They do not perform the task specified in the blueprints of DNA, but they rebel and go it alone. Cancer cells give up being a high level technical worker in the body and become instead the lowest form of life. Worse than any truant teenager – all they do all day is eat, excrete, reproduce and do it all while holding their breath. While holding their breath? What is this little detail that is overlooked by the oncologists?

That’s right. Cancer cells don’t require a lot of oxygen to live. In fact, it is this low oxygen level that allows them to thrive. Or to put it in a way that even a physician can understand: Cancer cells become cancerous not because they are the disease but because they are normal cells reacting to the causative factors of disease. That is, cancer cells become cancer cells because they are normal cells that cannot live in any other way. They are following the First Commandment of Life: “Thou must live”. And in order for them to live, they must give up their specific functions in the body and devolve to a lower level of Life that is not so demanding of them. They become cancer cells in order to survive, not because they want to be cancer cells.

From this perspective you can say that cancer is normal. It is not a disease but rather it is the reaction of certain cells in the body to stress factors that cause these cells to choose de-evolution to a cancerous state as a means of cellular survival. They give up being highly advanced cells – brain, heart, liver, kidney, skin, etc. – and take a step downward to a lower function. They become cancerous as a survival strategy because nature only gives them this choice – or they must die. Cancer is the reaction of cells to various factors that will cause their death if they do not devolve to a lower, cancerous state.

Of course, the Big Pharma scoundrels and the physicians-for-hire want to “treat” cancer. Yes, they have devised a trillion “treatments” none of which do any good except to their bank accounts. There is a lot of money in “treatments”. You can talk about “treatments” for years. You can offer your customers … I mean, your “patients” … years and years of the latest and greatest of treatments. Treatments! Treatments! Treatments! Forever! And all of this time, while the victims are suffering and dying and giving the hospitals their last pennies in vain, the doctors can avoid ever, ever mentioning that most forbidden word of modern medicine – “cure”. And why? Because if they actually cure anyone of cancer, then they can’t get them back for any more treatments!

And yet, cancer is easily cured with nothing more complicated than baking soda. But before telling you how this is done, I want to review something that the Johns Hopkins Hospital has stolen from the alternative medical professionals. They sent out a newsletter in 2007 that has also been circulated by the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Although their newsletter did not credit any alternative health practitioners or natural healing groups as to the source for their information, it was gratifying to see that what Naturopaths have been saying for over seventy years is finally being acknowledged by the swindlers of the Medical Monopoly. I will briefly review the main points of this newsletter below so that you Naturopathic Health experts and you idiots in the entrenched Medical Monopoly are all using the same language when you yell at each other.

All naturopaths already know these things but because it was new to the physicians and oncologists, here briefly is what the Johns Hopkins Hospital newsletter stated:

“Sugar is a cancer-feeder. By cutting off sugar it cuts off one important food supply to the cancer cells.

“Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer cells are being starved.”

5. “Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little chicken rather than beef or pork. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.”

6. “A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains, seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment. About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).”

7. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high caffeine. Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer-fighting properties. Water – best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic. Avoid it.”

8. “Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines become putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.”

9. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.

“Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6 , Flor-ssence , Essiac , anti-oxidants , vitamins , minerals , EFAs, etc.) to enable the body's own killer cells to destroy cancer cells. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.”

“Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit. A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment.

“Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily, and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.”

And this ends the good advice that the Johns Hopkins Hospital tosses out … then forgets entirely about. Although they make some basic errors with their assertions because they don’t really understand natural nutrition, it does contain almost everything that naturopaths of all varieties have been practicing and teaching for many years. But it does not give credit where credit is due. The physicians purloin our knowledge and take it for their own discovery and then they bill their patients for the information that we freely give while pretending to be physicians of great learning. And so, let’s leave these medical maniacs and show how cancer is easily cured with nothing more than baking soda. You will need the above ten points to put the puzzle together. And I will leave you and the physicians to argue about the above data which they have plagiarized without fully understanding.

The newsletter makes much of the importance of avoiding acidic and seeking alkaline but they do not know how to put two-and-two together to make any sense out of the information that they have stolen from us. They do not understand the cheap and easy and effective Naturopathic Way because they follow the fraudulent and profitable and expensive way of symptomatic medicine.

One of the much-overlooked “minor” details of cancer cells is that they thrive in a low oxygen environment. When the body is not able to fully oxygenate, these cells must either die of asphyxiation and toxic build-up or they must devolve to a lower state of existence where they can live and grow without so much oxygen. They become cancerous because there is not enough oxygen for them to remain normally functioning.

In point #1, above, the physicians rightfully state that cancerous cells feed on sugar. Actually, all cells feed on glucose. They absolutely do not seem to understand the difference between what glucose and sucrose do to the blood. What the physicians are missing is that the sucrose table sugar, the white flour products, the red meats, dairy products, coffee, candy and soda pop that the hospital provides from the hospital kitchen and from the Coke and candy machines on every floor, are bad enough on their own. These are the junk foods that the patients, themselves, got sick on. What the physicians do not understand is the blood chemistry that these junk foods unbalance. Yes, they take the necessary chemical tests. But they do not understand their own data because they are looking for a complicated treatment when the simple cure is staring them in the face.

Everybody knows how to stick a toy balloon on the wall after rubbing it on your head. It will stick tightly during dry weather but maybe not at all during damp weather. This is because the electro-static charge is strong during dry weather but gets leaked away during damp weather. Well, the same principle applies to how oxygen sticks to the blood cells during oxygenation, but in an ionic fluid instead of in an electrostatic gas.

As blood cells pass through the lungs, there is a very delicate balancing act that takes place between their cell surfaces and the ionic charges of the surrounding plasma. As they pass through the lungs, these purple-colored blood cells have the ionic charge that they received when picking up carbon dioxide. In contact with lung oxygen, this charge gets reversed so that the carbon dioxide drops off and the reversed charge attracts and picks up oxygen molecules. As their ionic charge reverses as they pick up a full supply of oxygen and their color changes from purple to red, these oxygenated blood cells are carried along through the body until they get into the vicinity of body cells that have a surplus of carbon-dioxide and need some oxygen. At that point, the ionic charges again reverse as the oxygen drops off and the carbon dioxide is attracted and sticks to the blood cell which once again changes to a purple color and is carried to the lungs. Yin and yang, a changing balance of polarities.

But just like a toy balloon that cannot stick to the wall in wet weather, oxygen cannot stick to a blood cell if the ionic balance of the blood is acidic. This is what the physicians and oncologists are overlooking. Every damned one of them has observed the ringing alarm bell going off but have muffled their ears and closed their eyes because they are looking for some expensive and complicated cure for cancer when both the cause and the cure are actually very simple.

They observe that cancer thrives in an acidic environment but they feed their patients sugar, white flour, red meats, ice cream and cake for dessert at just about every meal. They observe that cancer dies in a high oxygen environment, but they treat their patients to a choice between Coke and Pepsi from the vending machine down the hall. It is either much too simple for them to understand or else they are a witless part of a greedy and voracious conspiracy against the health of all of Mankind. Those are the only two choices, Doctor; take your pick.

The ringing alarm bell that the physicians are overlooking is the blood pH. Every cancer patient that I have ever seen, all without exception, had an acidic blood pH. But while the oncologists are pumping the patient full of chemotherapy, pizzas, pancakes, cokes, ice creams, hamburgers and fries, sweet rolls and jams, followed by radiation and surgery, they are ignoring the fact that cancer thrives in a low oxygen environment.

Oxygen cannot stick to blood cells if the pH of the blood is acidic. And rather than do everything that they can to raise the pH back up to a normal pH of 7.4 so that the blood can function properly, they prefer surgery. All of the advice that they have stolen from naturopathic medicine about “deep breathing” will do them no good at all. You can breath pure oxygen until you catch on fire but if the blood pH is acidic, then the oxygen will not be able to be picked up by the blood cells. It is chemically impossible. The blood must be normal and normal blood has a pH of around 7.4 pH. Any vestigial traces of oxygen that the acid-drenched blood cells manage to pick up are stripped off early by the oxygen-starved cells along the way and never reach the deeper parts of the body where oxygen is most needed. And because the pH is acidic, carbon dioxide also is not transported efficiently and so builds up within the tissues leading both to cell death and to a cell-to-cancer de-evolution for survival.

So, yes, cancer can be cured with ordinary baking soda. Bicarbonate is found in the blood naturally for the very real purpose of neutralizing acids. Therefore, those who want to cure your cancers should first follow the stolen advise found in the above newsletter. Not that the oncologists understand or follow this advice, themselves, but since they stole it from naturopathic medicine at least we can all agree that it is good advice. So, go to the health food stores and change your diet immediately.

But also do this: Take a pinch of baking soda (sodium bicarbonate) into your mouth, run it around your teeth and gums with your tongue while being sure to reach into the deepest parts of your gums and teeth and swallow it three times a day – more or less depending on how you feel. Also, drink a glass of water containing a teaspoon of baking soda before going to bed each night. But don’t over do this. Baking soda can kill you if you take too much of it. Take just a little bit and see how it makes you feel. If you feel okay, then take some more. Don’t overdo it but don’t be afraid to experiment. After all, the doctors experiment on you every time you go to see them as they “practice medicine”. So, why not experiment on yourself and save the money and the pain. But by all means change your diet to a natural and alkaline diet. And make baking soda a part of that diet.

The physicians will charge you a lot of money to take a pH test of your blood, but you can start monitoring the pH, yourself, by purchasing some pH test strips from a pharmacy. Test your tongue pH in the morning as well as your urine pH. Practice some yoga or Tai Chi Chuan or other deep breathing exercises and go on long walks to enjoy fresh air and your days on Earth. As your blood pH moves back up to the alkaline side of the chart, your deep breathing will fully oxygenate your blood. The cancer cells cannot survive all of that fresh oxygen so they die. And your T-killer cells, being full of vigor, will kill the cancer cells that remain. It’s as simple as that.

This is not advice that a cancer doctor will give you but it is advice that you can take whether you accept his treatments or not. After all, the normal pH of your blood is 7.4 but if the doctor wants to treat you without regard to what is normal, then maybe you should put yourself in Nature’s hands rather than his. If cancer is normal, then it would be normal for everybody to have cancer. But since it is not normal and since it thrives in situations that are not normal, then doesn’t it make sense to seek the things that are normal so that the cancer just disappears? A physician or oncologist who ignores the pH of your blood and does not know how to make it normal once again, is not qualified to be treating you in any way whatsoever. Avoid such physicians for the idiots that they are.

And whoops, oh dear! I am afraid that tooth decay is also cured with this simple remedy because baking soda kills decay-causing germs on contact. Will the purveyors of toothbrushes and pastes and drilling and filling and billing be pleased? No, those greedy betrayers and swindlers will not be pleased at all. They want you to be sick. But the sweet, happy smile of good health is the natural state of Mankind.

Amega Healing Technology

noreply@blogger.com (Nash Blogs) — Mon, 03 May 2010 08:24:00 +0000

If you in pain, have animals in pain, or love growing HUGE plants without genetic modifications listen to this audio introducing a ground breaking new discovery in the world of healing.

http://www.supload.com/listen?s=3Pqkx5

You can also visit this blog for more information and videos.

Contact me for more information if interested.