<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;DkADSHg7eyp7ImA9WhRaFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180</id><updated>2012-02-17T13:12:59.603+11:00</updated><category term="commute" /><category term="least common divisor" /><category term="pythagoras" /><category term="transcedental numbers" /><category term="real numbers" /><category term="pi" /><category term="greatest common multiple" /><category term="355" /><category term="Milo" /><category term="lowest common divisor" /><category term="Milü" /><category term="graph" /><category term="triangle" /><category term="complex numbers" /><category term="imaginary numbers" /><category term="prime factors calculator" /><category term="social networking" /><category term="quaternions" /><category term="irrational numbers" /><category term="113" /><category term="natural numbers" /><category term="rational numbers" /><category term="gcm" /><category term="integers" /><category term="addition" /><category term="reverse" /><category term="square" /><category term="humor" /><category term="math" /><category term="maths" /><category term="counting" /><category term="square roots" /><category term="humour" /><category term="cube" /><category term="halve" /><category term="division" /><category term="octonians" /><category term="rotation" /><category term="triple" /><category term="sedenions" /><category term="multiplication" /><category term="associativity" /><category term="continued fractions" /><category term="subtraction" /><category term="fractions" /><category term="power" /><category term="6174" /><category term="numbers" /><category term="lcd" /><category term="exponent" /><category term="calculator" /><title>Math Nuggets</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>23</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MathNuggets" /><feedburner:info uri="mathnuggets" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8FRHgyeSp7ImA9WxJRFEg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-4344851597426864509</id><published>2009-05-16T16:12:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-16T16:53:35.691+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-05-16T16:53:35.691+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="gcm" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="lowest common divisor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="least common divisor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="lcd" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="greatest common multiple" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="calculator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Greatest Common Divisor (GCD), Least Common Multiple (LCM)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/4344851597426864509/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/05/greatest-common-divisor-gcd-least.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4344851597426864509?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4344851597426864509?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/TGL2OD-3kF0/greatest-common-divisor-gcd-least.html" title="Greatest Common Divisor (GCD), Least Common Multiple (LCM)" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">This calculator takes two numbers and finds the greatest common divisor and the least common multiple.




var fnhash1 = {


  mygcdlcm : {fn: function (v)
             {
                v[0] = Math.abs(parseInt(v[0]));
                v[1] = Math.abs(parseInt(v[1]));
                a = v[0];
                b = v[1];
                while (b!=0) {
                  t = b;
                  b = 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EVQmSPXTWlPww4RSdm5wFhi628I/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EVQmSPXTWlPww4RSdm5wFhi628I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EVQmSPXTWlPww4RSdm5wFhi628I/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/EVQmSPXTWlPww4RSdm5wFhi628I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/TGL2OD-3kF0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/05/greatest-common-divisor-gcd-least.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMERHc_eip7ImA9WxJWEUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-4759236126525858598</id><published>2009-05-01T22:51:00.002+10:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T19:26:45.942+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-16T19:26:45.942+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="prime factors calculator" /><title>Prime Factors Calculator</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/4759236126525858598/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/05/prime-factors-calculator.html#comment-form" title="7 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4759236126525858598?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4759236126525858598?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/ILUQQ4orDIc/prime-factors-calculator.html" title="Prime Factors Calculator" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>7</thr:total><content type="html">I made this javascript prime factors calculator and have found it addictive. I just keep factorizing numbers. Enter the number to factorize in the left box and click on the 'factorize' button. The prime factors are shown in the right box.



function factor(x)
{
  if (x &amp;gt;= 9007199254740992) return 'too big for me';
  if (x==1) return '';
  m = Math.sqrt(x) + 0.5
  for (i=2;i');


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VxpVXjtOIbkXTMgDwOX29qBQPg8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VxpVXjtOIbkXTMgDwOX29qBQPg8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VxpVXjtOIbkXTMgDwOX29qBQPg8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VxpVXjtOIbkXTMgDwOX29qBQPg8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/ILUQQ4orDIc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/05/prime-factors-calculator.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkIERXY-cSp7ImA9WxJSEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-2977343390715781166</id><published>2009-04-22T09:57:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-05-02T22:48:24.859+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-05-02T22:48:24.859+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social networking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humour" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="humor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>The Numbers go Social Networking</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/2977343390715781166/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/numbers-go-social-networking.html#comment-form" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2977343390715781166?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2977343390715781166?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/xE-u151AXs0/numbers-go-social-networking.html" title="The Numbers go Social Networking" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_bNDumGgDsZg/Sel0don60aI/AAAAAAAAAHM/cBZK0XKe1PE/s72-c/pythagoras.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><content type="html">Names and photos are clickable.






 &amp;lt;!-- conversation --&amp;gt;

 &amp;lt;!-- image of 1st person--&amp;gt;

 


 &amp;lt;!-- comment of 1st person and all other comments --&amp;gt;

Pythagoras 
 is thinking that a2 + b2 = c2
for right angled triangles.
12 hours ago · Comment · Like












Natural at 10am on 14 April
Likes this!







Rational  at a ¼ past 10 on 14 April
like 3,4,5 &amp;amp; 20,21,29








Natural at 11am on 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zhnvhltFRhbv5rzh_Ec_z6rtPdM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zhnvhltFRhbv5rzh_Ec_z6rtPdM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zhnvhltFRhbv5rzh_Ec_z6rtPdM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zhnvhltFRhbv5rzh_Ec_z6rtPdM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/xE-u151AXs0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/numbers-go-social-networking.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUUDRX0-cSp7ImA9WxJTEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-4406034158668407374</id><published>2009-04-18T14:47:00.014+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T15:41:14.359+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T15:41:14.359+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="natural numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sedenions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="integers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="quaternions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rational numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="octonians" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="complex numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>When are addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and exponentiation allowed?</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/4406034158668407374/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/when-are-addition-subtraction.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4406034158668407374?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4406034158668407374?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/sBBuSM5xuAM/when-are-addition-subtraction.html" title="When are addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and exponentiation allowed?" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Now that we've had a look at several groups of numbers let's bring together what operations are allowed for each one:


+-×÷ab
natural numbersyesonly larger number minus smaller or equal numberyesonly if it divides evenly; can't divide by zeroyes
integersyesyesyesonly if it divides evenly; can't divide by zeroonly positive and zero powers
rational numbersyesyesyescan't divide by zerointeger 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rys9JXbp6prBhbt2mEMWmKIyxr0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rys9JXbp6prBhbt2mEMWmKIyxr0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rys9JXbp6prBhbt2mEMWmKIyxr0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/rys9JXbp6prBhbt2mEMWmKIyxr0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/sBBuSM5xuAM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/when-are-addition-subtraction.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0INRHY9fip7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-2361148813595404036</id><published>2009-04-18T10:10:00.002+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:39:55.866+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:39:55.866+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="sedenions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="quaternions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="octonians" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Quaternions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/2361148813595404036/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/quaternions.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2361148813595404036?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2361148813595404036?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/DNPSHgpUaH0/quaternions.html" title="Quaternions" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The quaternions are an extension of the complex numbers. Instead of having just one square root of minus one: i, why not have 3: i, j and k? 

We will need a way of multiplying them together. It turns out that the following works:

ij = k = -ji 
jk = i = -kj 
ki = j = -ki 
ijk = -1 

The quaternions are not commutative, which is quite strange. The order in which you multiply them matters! If you 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4JBT-NQ4Jm_30Fbv3W9ANVKf-7Y/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4JBT-NQ4Jm_30Fbv3W9ANVKf-7Y/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4JBT-NQ4Jm_30Fbv3W9ANVKf-7Y/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4JBT-NQ4Jm_30Fbv3W9ANVKf-7Y/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/DNPSHgpUaH0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/quaternions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YBSH8zcCp7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-3424803629614167240</id><published>2009-04-18T10:08:00.001+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:32:39.188+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:32:39.188+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="complex numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Complex Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/3424803629614167240/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/complex-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/3424803629614167240?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/3424803629614167240?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/E4bt6_qTsL4/complex-numbers.html" title="Complex Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The complex numbers are the combination of the real numbers with the imaginary numbers. They are written as the real part plus the imaginary part. For example: 

2 + 3i 

The imaginary number i is defined as the square root of minus one, so i2 = -1. Multiplication of complex numbers follows the same rules as the real numbers, you just have to keep track of each part of the multiplication: 

(2 + 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7F6oN_xS8rQSHrft3Zm0ESGL5qc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7F6oN_xS8rQSHrft3Zm0ESGL5qc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7F6oN_xS8rQSHrft3Zm0ESGL5qc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/7F6oN_xS8rQSHrft3Zm0ESGL5qc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/E4bt6_qTsL4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/complex-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8MRng9fip7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-1247867605611987546</id><published>2009-04-18T10:06:00.002+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:28:07.666+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:28:07.666+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="complex numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="imaginary numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Imaginary Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/1247867605611987546/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/imaginary-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/1247867605611987546?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/1247867605611987546?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/tT2Scwx4Cj8/imaginary-numbers.html" title="Imaginary Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The imaginary numbers are needed to fill in the last gap in exponentiation. The real numbers do not allow some negative numbers to be raised to fractional powers. For example they do not allow (-1)(1/2) = √(-1).

To get around this problem we can just make up an answer. We'll call this answer i. It can't be a real number, so it is outside the real numbers.

Using i allows us to find roots for all
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m7X0agjkm1MeWZ1KRdqTaeuK9Eo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m7X0agjkm1MeWZ1KRdqTaeuK9Eo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m7X0agjkm1MeWZ1KRdqTaeuK9Eo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m7X0agjkm1MeWZ1KRdqTaeuK9Eo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/tT2Scwx4Cj8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/imaginary-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMCSH49cSp7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-4846269722249229182</id><published>2009-04-18T10:04:00.018+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:04:29.069+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:04:29.069+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="transcedental numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Transcendental Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/4846269722249229182/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/transcendental-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4846269722249229182?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4846269722249229182?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/8PjPlPrudPM/transcendental-numbers.html" title="Transcendental Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The transcendental numbers are a part of the irrational numbers. Transcendental numbers are numbers that do not solve any polynomial equation that has rational coefficients. π and e are transcendental numbers so they don't solve any equations like:

4x - 7 =0
5x2 - 3x + 4 = 0
(4/5)x7 - 1.24x3 - 8 = 0

Strangely, it is not known whether π + e or π × e is transcendental, though at least one of them
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QbsadyzWNs1u7ZyplMT569nyj-w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QbsadyzWNs1u7ZyplMT569nyj-w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QbsadyzWNs1u7ZyplMT569nyj-w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QbsadyzWNs1u7ZyplMT569nyj-w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/8PjPlPrudPM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/transcendental-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUQARX49eSp7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-2167910032825250497</id><published>2009-04-18T09:54:00.005+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:02:24.061+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:02:24.061+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Real Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/2167910032825250497/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/real-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2167910032825250497?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2167910032825250497?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/W0mUgTxvRpE/real-numbers.html" title="Real Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">If we combine the rational numbers with the irrational numbers we get the real numbers. In the real numbers we find positive numbers, negative numbers, integers, fractions, square roots, cube roots, fractional roots, &amp;amp;#x03C0, e, zero...

Like the rational numbers, we can add, subtract, multiply and divide any two numbers (except dividing by zero). But with the real numbers we can also raise any 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mydHsqqGwKc_V-FcRbXe9A6U79A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mydHsqqGwKc_V-FcRbXe9A6U79A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mydHsqqGwKc_V-FcRbXe9A6U79A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/mydHsqqGwKc_V-FcRbXe9A6U79A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/W0mUgTxvRpE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/real-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUIBRXgyeip7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-7432984134736477748</id><published>2009-04-17T20:27:00.010+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T14:05:54.692+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T14:05:54.692+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="square roots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="irrational numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Irrational Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/7432984134736477748/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/irrational-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/7432984134736477748?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/7432984134736477748?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/SRsFckolQy8/irrational-numbers.html" title="Irrational Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Just as rational numbers were made up by ratios, the irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a ratio. For example the square root of 2 does not equal one integer divided by another. You can get closer and closer with fractions, but you will never exactly equal √2. 

This also means that the decimal expansion of an irrational number goes on forever.

Square roots, cube roots and other roots can 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/eeHqJjDloYRe8jxbmbhgZol3aCw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/eeHqJjDloYRe8jxbmbhgZol3aCw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/eeHqJjDloYRe8jxbmbhgZol3aCw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/eeHqJjDloYRe8jxbmbhgZol3aCw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/SRsFckolQy8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/irrational-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAER349fCp7ImA9WxJTEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-6598529125683109288</id><published>2009-04-17T20:12:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T13:51:46.064+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T13:51:46.064+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fractions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rational numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Rational Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/6598529125683109288/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/rational-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/6598529125683109288?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/6598529125683109288?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/6UkSQiFFN9M/rational-numbers.html" title="Rational Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">We grouped the negative numbers with the natural numbers to get the integers. Now we increase our set of numbers further to get the rational numbers.

The rational numbers include all of the fractions made by dividing one integer by another, except that you can't divide by zero. So positive and negative fractions, fractions smaller than one, fractions larger than one, and all the integers (you 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/163DrL_dAqYpdVe5Lyfi_m17kSo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/163DrL_dAqYpdVe5Lyfi_m17kSo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/163DrL_dAqYpdVe5Lyfi_m17kSo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/163DrL_dAqYpdVe5Lyfi_m17kSo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/6UkSQiFFN9M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/rational-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUCQHo7fip7ImA9WxVaGEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-207929454747949957</id><published>2009-04-16T22:48:00.004+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-16T23:24:21.406+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-16T23:24:21.406+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="integers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Integers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/207929454747949957/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/integers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/207929454747949957?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/207929454747949957?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/sWLCxCPRrig/integers.html" title="Integers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">"Dad, can you buy me those butterfly wings?"
"They are seven dollars. How about you use some of your own money?"
"But I don't have my money with me."
"If I buy the wings, you can owe me the money and give it to me when we get back home."
Shortly afterwards my daughter has the butterfly wings and -$7 in her pocket and is thus introduced to negative numbers, and spending on credit.

The first 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GlTVp_spXop0cA2XXhAhElK5n4Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GlTVp_spXop0cA2XXhAhElK5n4Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GlTVp_spXop0cA2XXhAhElK5n4Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/GlTVp_spXop0cA2XXhAhElK5n4Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/sWLCxCPRrig" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/integers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUYER3c7eip7ImA9WxVaF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-2316327145950516149</id><published>2009-04-15T16:17:00.003+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T16:31:46.902+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T16:31:46.902+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="natural numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="counting" /><title>Natural Numbers</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/2316327145950516149/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/natural-numbers.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2316327145950516149?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2316327145950516149?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/SMocGuqx-xY/natural-numbers.html" title="Natural Numbers" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">"What do you get when you take away 7 from 3?", I ask my daughter. "You can't do that. That's silly", she replies. "What about if I divide 5 in half?" "You get 2 in one group and 3 in the other."

Such in the world of a child, and such is the world of the natural numbers. In this world you start at zero and count 1, 2, 3 and so on. That's all the numbers you've got.

There's no problem with 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1EdjID723dlIUcz_dWH0IkCHZEg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1EdjID723dlIUcz_dWH0IkCHZEg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1EdjID723dlIUcz_dWH0IkCHZEg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/1EdjID723dlIUcz_dWH0IkCHZEg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/SMocGuqx-xY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/natural-numbers.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUMDRn44eip7ImA9WxJTEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-4571951448362465139</id><published>2009-04-13T18:19:00.006+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-18T15:44:37.032+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-18T15:44:37.032+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commute" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="associativity" /><title>Associative, but not commutative</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/4571951448362465139/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/associative-but-not-commutative.html#comment-form" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4571951448362465139?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/4571951448362465139?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/tBNkbnr-4jY/associative-but-not-commutative.html" title="Associative, but not commutative" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><content type="html">Every operation mentioned in the previous post that is associative is also commutative, and everything mentioned that is not associative is not commutative.

associativecommutative
additionyesyes
mutiplicationyesyes
subtractionnono
divisionnono
exponentiationnono

So is there anything that is associative but not commutative?

Let's look at rotation.

Can we show that rotation is not commutative? 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2U4OXuOv6P6SZYvDHO4kcX6eeeo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2U4OXuOv6P6SZYvDHO4kcX6eeeo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2U4OXuOv6P6SZYvDHO4kcX6eeeo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2U4OXuOv6P6SZYvDHO4kcX6eeeo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/tBNkbnr-4jY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/associative-but-not-commutative.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkUARHw7cCp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-3576688278365621880</id><published>2009-04-12T09:00:00.012+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:57:25.208+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:57:25.208+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commute" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Milo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="rotation" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="associativity" /><title>Would you eat chocolate milk powder? (associativity)</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/3576688278365621880/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/would-you-eat-chocolate-milk-powder.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/3576688278365621880?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/3576688278365621880?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/BZtPOtuWJNc/would-you-eat-chocolate-milk-powder.html" title="Would you eat chocolate milk powder? (associativity)" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">"Yuk! Why are you eating Milo* straight?", I ask my daughter. "Isn't it better mixed in milk?" "I've already drunk the milk", she replies, "so now I'm eating the Milo."

Is drinking milk and then eating Milo, the same as first mixing the Milo in the milk and then drinking the result? Maybe your stomach doesn't notice, but it certainly tastes different.

To write this another way, are these things
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BDyZxlm5jjQPdxKHtAJBXLWFNPU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BDyZxlm5jjQPdxKHtAJBXLWFNPU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BDyZxlm5jjQPdxKHtAJBXLWFNPU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/BDyZxlm5jjQPdxKHtAJBXLWFNPU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/BZtPOtuWJNc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/would-you-eat-chocolate-milk-powder.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkYHR3YzcSp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-9166275511670701665</id><published>2009-04-11T09:23:00.012+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:55:36.889+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:55:36.889+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="commute" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="division" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="power" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="exponent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="addition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="subtraction" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="multiplication" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Put on your shoes and socks: commutation</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/9166275511670701665/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/put-on-your-shoes-and-socks-commutation.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/9166275511670701665?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/9166275511670701665?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/HgZTsfXSI5o/put-on-your-shoes-and-socks-commutation.html" title="Put on your shoes and socks: commutation" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">"Put on your shoes and socks - but not in that order", I say to my daughter, who sighs at my frequently repeated joke. The order you put your clothes on matters. Putting on your shoes then your socks is quite different from putting on your socks first and then your shoes.

On the other hand, it doesn't matter which sock you put on first, your left or your right.

In mathematics, when the order 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pdZ3JRwQPEFIuZY7RL4lf_VDRh0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pdZ3JRwQPEFIuZY7RL4lf_VDRh0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pdZ3JRwQPEFIuZY7RL4lf_VDRh0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pdZ3JRwQPEFIuZY7RL4lf_VDRh0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/HgZTsfXSI5o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/put-on-your-shoes-and-socks-commutation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU4DRXc9cSp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-6138257154044868260</id><published>2009-04-09T17:45:00.011+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:52:54.969+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:52:54.969+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="continued fractions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="square roots" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pi" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fractions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="355" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="113" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="irrational numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Continued fractions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/6138257154044868260/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/continued-fractions.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/6138257154044868260?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/6138257154044868260?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/aKKFzZDqKGg/continued-fractions.html" title="Continued fractions" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Any whole number or simple fraction can be written as a continued fraction. Continued fractions appear a little strange and look like this:

        1
a0 + ----------------------
            1
     a1 + ---------------
               1
          a2 + --------
               a3 + ...



To make it easier to write down, the above fraction is written as:

[a0 ; a1, a2, a3 ...]

For example, the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qcYW05tH3rsF6F253H-aqw2bK8Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qcYW05tH3rsF6F253H-aqw2bK8Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qcYW05tH3rsF6F253H-aqw2bK8Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qcYW05tH3rsF6F253H-aqw2bK8Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/aKKFzZDqKGg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/continued-fractions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUANR3s5eSp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-5648838915946253028</id><published>2009-04-08T20:36:00.010+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:49:56.521+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:49:56.521+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Milü" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pi" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="fractions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="355" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="113" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Pi by fractions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/5648838915946253028/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/pi-by-fractions.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5648838915946253028?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5648838915946253028?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/U9kkf8GFAuE/pi-by-fractions.html" title="Pi by fractions" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><content type="html">The circumference of a circle divided by its diameter is always the same number, no matter the size of the circle. This number is called π (pi) and has the value 3.1415926535...

π is an irrational number, which means that it cannot be expressed as a simple fraction such as 1/5 or 3/4. However, you can get pretty close.

A fraction that is often used is 22/7. This is not all that good:

22/7 = 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yUfZrBXhEIxt4VhU1XThQ1bVOJQ/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yUfZrBXhEIxt4VhU1XThQ1bVOJQ/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yUfZrBXhEIxt4VhU1XThQ1bVOJQ/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yUfZrBXhEIxt4VhU1XThQ1bVOJQ/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/U9kkf8GFAuE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/pi-by-fractions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUEAQX86fCp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-5018195066096663163</id><published>2009-04-08T16:09:00.009+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:47:20.114+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:47:20.114+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="triangle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pythagoras" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>More Pythagorean Triangles</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/5018195066096663163/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-pythagorean-triangles.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5018195066096663163?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5018195066096663163?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/IHeGCG7x41E/more-pythagorean-triangles.html" title="More Pythagorean Triangles" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Here's another rule for generating Pythagorean trianges, Last time each triangle began with an odd number. This time we will use even numbers:

4, 3, 5 (16 + 9 = 25)
6, 8, 10  (36 + 64 = 100)
8, 15, 17  (64 + 225 = 289)

You generate first number of the next line by writing down the next even number. To find the second and third numbers, add the first number to the second number in the previous 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XHGLk_qzG7Qj3WjOgCCv67SgjU8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XHGLk_qzG7Qj3WjOgCCv67SgjU8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XHGLk_qzG7Qj3WjOgCCv67SgjU8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XHGLk_qzG7Qj3WjOgCCv67SgjU8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/IHeGCG7x41E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-pythagorean-triangles.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIAR3k4fSp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-5190772883410719016</id><published>2009-04-07T21:34:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:45:46.735+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:45:46.735+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="triangle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pythagoras" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Generate Pythagoras Triangles</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/5190772883410719016/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/generate-pythagoras-triangles.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5190772883410719016?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/5190772883410719016?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/zWxBztZjKfo/generate-pythagoras-triangles.html" title="Generate Pythagoras Triangles" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Triangles containing a right angle are called Pythagorean triangles. Their side lengths have a simple relationship. The sum of the squares of the shorter side lengths equals the square of the length of the longer side.

A simple example is a triangle with side lengths:

3, 4 and 5

since

32 + 42 = 9 + 16 = 25 = 52

Some other examples are:

5, 12, 13 (25 + 144 = 169)
6, 8, 10 (36 + 64 = 100)
7, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A_dQZq55YJ62sPZRz8GcYSZtZ1A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A_dQZq55YJ62sPZRz8GcYSZtZ1A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A_dQZq55YJ62sPZRz8GcYSZtZ1A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/A_dQZq55YJ62sPZRz8GcYSZtZ1A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/zWxBztZjKfo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/generate-pythagoras-triangles.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQDR3o-eip7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-8446716781947957012</id><published>2009-04-05T20:13:00.015+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:42:56.452+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:42:56.452+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="square" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="cube" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Cube Sum is a Square</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/8446716781947957012/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/cube-sum-is-square.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/8446716781947957012?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/8446716781947957012?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/O4-XQYbPaWs/cube-sum-is-square.html" title="Cube Sum is a Square" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Pick a whole number. If you add up the cubes of all the whole numbers from 1 to your number, you will get the same as if you add up all the numbers from 1 to your number and then square the result.

For example choose the number 3:

Add up the cubes of all the numbers from 1 to 3:

13 + 23 + 33 = 1 + 8 + 27 = 36

Now, add up all the numbers from 1 to your number

1 + 2 + 3 = 6

and then square 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QwugVxMagzNRL-n_R1YSRHZPfZU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QwugVxMagzNRL-n_R1YSRHZPfZU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QwugVxMagzNRL-n_R1YSRHZPfZU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/QwugVxMagzNRL-n_R1YSRHZPfZU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/O4-XQYbPaWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/cube-sum-is-square.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYCSH88eSp7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-2387885210747523258</id><published>2009-04-05T17:28:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:39:29.171+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:39:29.171+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="reverse" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="6174" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="graph" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>6174</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/2387885210747523258/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/6174.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2387885210747523258?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/2387885210747523258?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/D5lxfMluoiA/6174.html" title="6174" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bNDumGgDsZg/Sdhhvaym_nI/AAAAAAAAAGA/8ZMYDAcmtus/s72-c/reversediff2ndnode.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Take a four digit number. Put the digits in order from smallest to biggest to make number A. Then put them in order from biggest to smallest to make number B. Calculate B minus A to get the answer.

Repeat this process with the answer, and keep repeating.

For example  start with 7119.
Putting the digits in order from smallest to largest:
1179
Now from largest to smallest:
9711
Subtract:
9711 - 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZQK5OSfQeYZq-E15waA2rG0HuMg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZQK5OSfQeYZq-E15waA2rG0HuMg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZQK5OSfQeYZq-E15waA2rG0HuMg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ZQK5OSfQeYZq-E15waA2rG0HuMg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/D5lxfMluoiA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/6174.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcDSXwyfip7ImA9WxVaF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-534212227857180.post-7528046255979924364</id><published>2009-04-05T12:02:00.007+10:00</published><updated>2009-04-15T12:37:58.296+10:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-04-15T12:37:58.296+10:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="maths" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="halve" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="graph" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="triple" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="numbers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="math" /><title>Halve and Triple</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/feeds/7528046255979924364/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/halve-and-triple.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/7528046255979924364?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/534212227857180/posts/default/7528046255979924364?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MathNuggets/~3/-Y_EtDj6xqs/halve-and-triple.html" title="Halve and Triple" /><author><name>Paul</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/08126561393839340751</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_bNDumGgDsZg/SdhQEqydnnI/AAAAAAAAAF4/AkWTzm8zQzw/s72-c/halftriple26.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Think of a whole number. If it's even, halve it. If it's odd, triple it and add one. Then repeat this procedure with the answer. Continue until you reach 1.


Did you get to 1 quickly? Or did it take a long time, going through many numbers?


It depends which number you start with. 8 is very quick, taking only three turns: 8, 4, 2, 1. But 9 takes 19 turns! (9, 28, 14, 7, 22, 11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wKGluTAXHDvUaC_D7_D6TUsJaHY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wKGluTAXHDvUaC_D7_D6TUsJaHY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wKGluTAXHDvUaC_D7_D6TUsJaHY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wKGluTAXHDvUaC_D7_D6TUsJaHY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MathNuggets/~4/-Y_EtDj6xqs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://mathnuggets.blogspot.com/2009/04/halve-and-triple.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

