<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>medicalphysicsweb: Opinion</title>
    <link>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/channel/opinion</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd</copyright>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 07:59:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:45:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://syndication.iop.org/cws</docs>
    <webMaster>custserv@iop.org</webMaster>
    <generator>CWS Feed Generator 1.0 (http://syndication.iop.org/cws)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-07-13T07:59:55Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd</dc:rights>
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MedPhysOpinion" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
      <title>Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: its role in radiation therapy</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/wQdQV0pZ6qg/39542</link>
      <description>VMAT is currently a hot topic in radiotherapy. But it's still lacking a universal theory relating the resulting dose distribution and clinical outcome to input parameters, explains Steve Webb.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/wQdQV0pZ6qg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39542</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T07:45:51Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39542</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The potential of PET: a closer look</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/HlSp3Divvp0/39410</link>
      <description>PET/CT shows great potential for target delineation in radiation therapy planning. In a recent paper in the journal &lt;i&gt;Academic Radiology&lt;/i&gt;, Habib Zaidi reviews progress in molecular-imaging-guided radiotherapy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/HlSp3Divvp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39410</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-08T12:01:15Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39410</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Optical modelling points the way to PDT progress</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/VJD7ChaWlH8/39058</link>
      <description>Off-the-shelf commercial software is helping scientists to enhance the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy for targeted tumour destruction, reports Joe McEntee.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/VJD7ChaWlH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39058</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-14T09:14:47Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39058</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Diagnostic imaging: advancing radiation protection</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/xKjU9htUrEA/38655</link>
      <description>Web-enabled QA software tools could help the medical physics community develop a quantitative risk-benefit framework for diagnostic radiology, explains Michael Moores.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/xKjU9htUrEA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38655</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-04-15T07:50:46Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38655</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>IMRT planning: biological models take a central role</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/QFYTBN2MHOk/38206</link>
      <description>Using tumour control probability models for IMRT planning could enable the ultimate balance between control and toxicity, explains NKI's Marnix Witte.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/QFYTBN2MHOk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38206</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-12T11:51:12Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38206</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Clinical implementation: how can IMRT become routine?</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/yrnfuRHlHOY/37799</link>
      <description>IMRT offers the potential for superior target coverage and reduced normal-tissue exposure, so why is it not yet the standard radiotherapy modality at all clinical centres? Marco Schwarz discusses.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/yrnfuRHlHOY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37799</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-02-16T11:29:04Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37799</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Computational grids in radiotherapy: optimal IMRT planning</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/wIEiBtq-LHo/37308</link>
      <description>For the ultimate in radiotherapy treatment planning, try selecting an optimal plan from a large set of quasi-optimal potentials. Such a scheme could be enabled by exploiting the power of a computational grid, argues Dimitri Dimitroyannis.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/wIEiBtq-LHo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:45:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37308</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-01-14T11:45:09Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37308</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Disruptive thinking on proton therapy</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/nDePefm_nmc/37129</link>
      <description>TomoTherapy's Rock Mackie believes that disruptive innovation will transform the economics and logistics of proton therapy. Joe McEntee reports on plans to make protons a mainstream treatment option.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/nDePefm_nmc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37129</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-12-22T09:50:50Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37129</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>IMRT: next move, biological optimization?</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/4dFBhE1WvQc/37033</link>
      <description>The unique beam-delivery conditions of IMRT offer an opportunity to optimize the biological response of tumour cells to therapeutic irradiation, explains Natalka Suchowerska of the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Sydney, Australia.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/4dFBhE1WvQc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37033</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-12-11T11:34:51Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37033</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Medical isotope supplies: a game plan for the future</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/xYsU8wo26pg/36974</link>
      <description>A Canadian task force has identified a promising alternative method for making large quantities of Mo-99, using natural uranium and photons from a high-power accelerator.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/xYsU8wo26pg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 08:18:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/36974</guid>
      <dc:date>2008-12-08T08:18:09Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/36974</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
