<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>medicalphysicsweb: Opinion</title>
    <link>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/channel/opinion</link>
    <description />
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd</copyright>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:23:54 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <docs>http://syndication.iop.org/cws</docs>
    <webMaster>custserv@iop.org</webMaster>
    <generator>CWS Feed Generator 1.0 (http://syndication.iop.org/cws)</generator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-10T03:52:29Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright © 2009 IOP Publishing Ltd</dc:rights>
    
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MedPhysOpinion" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>In vivo dosimetry: implementation issues</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/Y-qtb6Mi9Uo/40833</link>
      <description>In vivo radiotherapy dosimetry has a great deal to offer, so why is it not more widely deployed? Writing in the British Journal of Radiology, Craig Edwards takes a closer look.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/Y-qtb6Mi9Uo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:23:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40833</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-10-28T11:23:54Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40833</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Bringing medical physics to the developing world</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/AAjZvIlCEaU/40484</link>
      <description>Setting up medical physics facilities in developing countries requires not only access to appropriate systems, but also effective training of staff to operate and maintain this equipment. Henry Lawrence discusses his experiences.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/AAjZvIlCEaU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40484</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T09:44:54Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40484</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Threats to ultra-high-field MRI</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/AGFq9FhfcCA/40241</link>
      <description>A European directive designed to prevent workers from being exposed to high magnetic fields could potentially have a severe impact on research into MRI, warns Denis Le Bihan.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/AGFq9FhfcCA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:47:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40241</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-27T07:47:10Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/40241</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Radiation therapy risks: prioritizing patient safety</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/En0wKQsOxjg/39997</link>
      <description>In a comprehensive review of radiotherapy safety incidents, Jesmin Shafiq and Michael Barton reveal that although errors leading to serious incidents are rare, it's vital that treatment centres implement and continually monitor risk-reducing measures.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/En0wKQsOxjg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39997</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-08-04T13:47:43Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39997</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Volumetric-modulated arc therapy: its role in radiation therapy</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/wQdQV0pZ6qg/39542</link>
      <description>VMAT is currently a hot topic in radiotherapy. But it's still lacking a universal theory relating the resulting dose distribution and clinical outcome to input parameters, explains Steve Webb.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/wQdQV0pZ6qg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 07:45:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39542</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-25T07:45:51Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39542</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>The potential of PET: a closer look</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/HlSp3Divvp0/39410</link>
      <description>PET/CT shows great potential for target delineation in radiation therapy planning. In a recent paper in the journal &lt;i&gt;Academic Radiology&lt;/i&gt;, Habib Zaidi reviews progress in molecular-imaging-guided radiotherapy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/HlSp3Divvp0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 12:01:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39410</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-06-08T12:01:15Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39410</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Optical modelling points the way to PDT progress</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/VJD7ChaWlH8/39058</link>
      <description>Off-the-shelf commercial software is helping scientists to enhance the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy for targeted tumour destruction, reports Joe McEntee.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/VJD7ChaWlH8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 09:14:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39058</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-05-14T09:14:47Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/39058</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Diagnostic imaging: advancing radiation protection</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/xKjU9htUrEA/38655</link>
      <description>Web-enabled QA software tools could help the medical physics community develop a quantitative risk-benefit framework for diagnostic radiology, explains Michael Moores.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/xKjU9htUrEA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:50:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38655</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-04-15T07:50:46Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38655</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>IMRT planning: biological models take a central role</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/QFYTBN2MHOk/38206</link>
      <description>Using tumour control probability models for IMRT planning could enable the ultimate balance between control and toxicity, explains NKI's Marnix Witte.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/QFYTBN2MHOk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:51:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38206</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-03-12T11:51:12Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/38206</feedburner:origLink></item>
    <item>
      <title>Clinical implementation: how can IMRT become routine?</title>
      <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~3/yrnfuRHlHOY/37799</link>
      <description>IMRT offers the potential for superior target coverage and reduced normal-tissue exposure, so why is it not yet the standard radiotherapy modality at all clinical centres? Marco Schwarz discusses.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MedPhysOpinion/~4/yrnfuRHlHOY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:29:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37799</guid>
      <dc:date>2009-02-16T11:29:04Z</dc:date>
    <feedburner:origLink>http://medicalphysicsweb.org/cws/article/opinion/37799</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>
