<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Social Media</category><category>Online Streaming</category><category>Cable Advertising</category><category>Research</category><category>Newspapers</category><category>Print Advertising</category><category>television advertising</category><category>Word of Mouth</category><category>Outdoor Advertising</category><category>Mobile Advertising</category><category>Email Marketing</category><category>Arbitron</category><category>Radio Advertising</category><category>Online Advertising</category><category>Frequently Asked Questions</category><category>Kansas City Media Buying</category><category>Media Industry</category><category>New Technology</category><category>Economy</category><category>Demographics</category><category>online TV content</category><category>Media Consumption</category><category>Mobile Applications</category><category>Media Planning</category><category>Online Radio Advertising</category><category>Target Audience</category><category>smartphones</category><category>Media Research</category><category>e-reader</category><category>Tablet</category><category>Political Advertising</category><category>Movies</category><category>Outside the Box</category><category>Psychographics</category><category>Theatre Advertising</category><category>Linda's Spotlight</category><category>Media Technology</category><title>We Know Media: Research, Trends, and Much More...</title><description>The official media blog of Ruth Burke &amp;amp; Associates; a professional media planning, buying and consulting service.</description><link>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>226</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MediaResearchandTrends" /><feedburner:info uri="mediaresearchandtrends" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-8849841545752368584</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-05-16T16:29:24.126-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Radio Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Radio Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Streaming</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>How do young consumers listen to music?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;While
streaming music online is growing more popular among consumers, it’s easy to
forget that traditional radio still has a strong footprint in the media market.
According to eMarketer, the research company The NPD Group conducted a survey
over 4&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; quarter 2012 on the music listening of US consumers between
the ages of 13 and 35.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Results
showed that the terrestrial radio still lead as the primary method, by a small
margin, to listen to music.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;24%
listened to radio primarily&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;23%
listened to internet radio primarily&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;15%
listened to digital files primarily&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;CDs
and Satellite radio both had less than 10% of responders, 9% and 5%
respectively, chose it as a primary method of listening to music.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Another
find was that the car is still the main place where the majority of those
surveyed listen to most music. A good reason is that listeners are able to use
multiple devices in the car like the radio, smartphones, mp3 players, and
in-car infotainment systems.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;How
does this affect advertisers? Consumers want music, and they want it their way.
Whether it’s from their preferred radio station, favorite playlist, new CD, or
online streaming, people are going to access the music. Therefore, advertisers
will need to really understand their customer and be able to reach them on
various music platforms at the same time. There is no need to pull money out of
traditional radio; listeners are still listening. Instead, online streaming vendors
may need to be evaluated as a radio station and included in the overall buy in
order to reach the desired audience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/p8fNk4AU4BE/how-do-young-consumers-listen-to-music.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/05/how-do-young-consumers-listen-to-music.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-1539916981856554429</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-05-10T15:59:12.202-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Theatre Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Cinema advertising network to roll out new consumer interactive products in 2013</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;National
CineMedia (NCM) has changed up a few advertising tactics in order to increase
total revenue spend according to MediaPost. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;As
one of the largest cinema advertising networks in America, the vendor has begun
the process of phasing out the Fathom Business Events operations. With events
revenue fading out, NCM will invest in new products in order to increase total revenue.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;One
new product will be an interactive video display called a “Monster Wall.” The
wall will be approximately 8 feet by 10 feet and encourage people to interact
with it by way of game and entertainment content. “Monster Wall” will also
house interactive advertising content for moviegoers, which will give
advertisers another way of reaching potential consumers. So far, it’s being
tested in large markets. Should it be deemed successful, it will be dispersed
across the network’s other theaters.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Another
initiative rolling out later this year is FirstLook Sync, which is a
second-screen capability with smartphones. The idea is to have movie audiences
interact with the movie content through this technology. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;With
all of the upcoming changes this year, NCM is estimating a 1-4% increase in
total revenue compared to 2012.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/uFLfX1Np4eM/cinema-advertising-network-to-roll-out.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/05/cinema-advertising-network-to-roll-out.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-3356239493391131109</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-05-03T16:00:01.517-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Social Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Half of online video shares happen within the first three weeks of publishing</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;As
advertisers are more regularly running video advertisements online, it leads to
the question, how will an advertiser know if this is successful? At this point,
there is a two-pronged answer. The first is recording how often the video is
watched in its entirety, versus being skipped. The second is watching to see if
the video goes viral with social-sharing. Unruly Media Inc., a video technology
company, recently researched the process of video sharing on social websites
worldwide.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to e-Marketer, the top categories that received the most shares were
entertainment and fast-moving consumer goods and consumer products category.
The smallest amount of shares was from the finance category.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Research
also discovered the timeline in which most shares were performed. Unruly Media
pulled information from the top 200 most shared videos in 2012. It found that:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;10%
of shares happened on the second day the video was available&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;25%
of shares happened within the first three days&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;50%
of shares happened over the first three weeks&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;66%
of shares happened within the first three months&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Overall,
this can show advertisers the importance of making video available to the
masses and making it relevant enough to share.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/8UEOruAO6Es/half-of-online-video-shares-happen.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/05/half-of-online-video-shares-happen.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-3505932702738273378</guid><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-26T13:14:15.576-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Radio Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Industry</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Does heavy media consumption negatively affect other media?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;If
a consumer is a heavy user with one media platform, does that mean that they
will consume less from another? Not necessarily, according to a study from
Edison Research and Arbitron. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The
Center for Media Research recently released results from a study that tracked
media use consumption. The three top reaching media platforms are radio, online
and TV, and the study focused on its heavy user habits. On average, persons 12+
consume 3:33 hours of television a day, 2:38 hours of the internet, and 2:04
hours of radio.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Results
reflected that heavy online users spent about seven hours per day on the
internet. By contrast, these heavy users consumed the average amount of TV at
3:35 hours and radio at 2:07 hours. Meaning, the steep skew towards online
media consumption did not directly affect other media habits.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The
trend continued with heavy TV users. This group averaged about 8:16 hours a day
watching TV compared to 2:52 hours being online, and 2:12 hours listening to
radio. All media was above the national averages.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Lastly,
the heavy radio users spent about 6:23 hours listening, 3:31 hours watching TV,
and 3:00 being online.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In
conclusion, the study mentioned that the average time spent will all three
media is 8:15 hours. This is up from the 7:03 hours average ten years ago. That
being said, it leads one to believe that there is some media usage overlap to
account for the increased consumption.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/o_-S9MOOfu4/does-heavy-media-consumption-negatively.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/04/does-heavy-media-consumption-negatively.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-625063381146023216</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-18T13:55:17.705-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Print Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tablet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">e-reader</category><title>Which is easier to read- print, tablet or e-reader?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;What
difference does it make whether one media is easier to read than another? It can
make a big difference if you want someone to read something long enough to see
your advertisement. Researchers at Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz,
Germany recently did a study to see which print form, print, tablets, or
e-readers, are easiest to read.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to MediaPost, the study divided the research participants into two groups with
one being between the ages of 21-34, and the other being 60+. While the groups
read from print, tablets and e-readers, researchers were tracking eye movement
and brain activity. This was done to determine how much neural power is needed
to read the same text but in different formats. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Results
showed that there wasn’t much variance between reading formats for the
younger-skewing group. However, the older-skewing group did have some differences.
This group, on average, read text on an iPad tablet three or four seconds
faster than the other forms. Also, when reading the iPad, the same group showed
lower level of brain activity. Meaning, it was easier to read than print and
e-readers. Researchers reasoned this could be because of the tablet computers’
backlit screens, which can make text stand out more from the page.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Overall,
how can advertisers use this to their advantage? It would be extreme to cut out
all advertising in print and e-readers all together if the goal is to reach the
older-skewing demographic. Instead, it would be recommended to maintain coverage
in existing media and possibly expand into other media forms like the iPad.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/dZyvQ81bJ6Q/which-is-easier-to-read-print-tablet-or.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/04/which-is-easier-to-read-print-tablet-or.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-1628340908099575665</guid><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-11T11:33:14.656-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Demographics</category><title>Is television reaching an older audience?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;With
broadcast television, some networks skew younger than others, but how exactly
are they ranking? From looking at the first two weeks of the fall 2012 season,
it appears that most networks are growing older.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to MediaPost, most of the median ages increased from the year prior:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;CBS: Median age of 57.8
years; 55.3 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;ABC: Median age of 55.3
years; 53.4 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;NBC: Median age of 47.8
years; 48.7 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;Fox: Median age of 43.3
years; 41.8 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;CW: Median age of 40.9
years; 36.6 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;Univision: Median age of
40.4 years; 36.8 in 2011.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;What
does this information tell us? First of all, the data was pulled from the initial
two weeks of the fall season. Therefore, it may have leveled out throughout the
season. However, it does still show a trend towards an older audience. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It’s
up to advertisers to figure out how best to reach their audience. For example,
if the desired consumer is younger, look at younger skewing networks or look at
younger skewing programming within all networks. Just because the median is
slightly older, doesn’t mean that the younger audience has left. It simply
means that the active audience is staying with certain programs and networks in
spite of the fact they are getting older.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/je6VjLxxd3g/is-television-reaching-older-audience.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/04/is-television-reaching-older-audience.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-6173226031098866042</guid><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-04-05T13:18:04.878-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cable Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>FXX to launch this fall to a younger demographic</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In
recent TV upfronts, the Fox cable group announced plans to launch a new cable
channel this September. Already running FX, the new sister channel will be
called FXX.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to MediaPost, FXX will target a younger skewing audience of people 18-34. In
order to help bolster interest, two successful FX programs, “It’s Always Sunny
in Philadelphia” and “The League” will move to FXX. In addition, two original
comedies, and a late-night show will be added to the programming. Eventually,
the new channel hopes to expand to original dramas. The cable group intends to
reach a distribution of 74 million homes within the first year.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;With
this addition, the Fox cable group will be able to reach the majority of the
demographics with FXX reaching the younger audience of adults 18-34, FX reaching
the young to middle aged adults 18-49, and the Fox Movie Channel, FXM, reaching
the older audience of adults 25-54. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Advertisers
will need to keep an eye on the new channel to see if the programming has
enough leg to make it a success. In theory, this could be a new option to reach
a young adult audience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/vO-sKW-uWWA/fxx-to-launch-this-fall-to-younger.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/04/fxx-to-launch-this-fall-to-younger.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-6313271082359693331</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-28T10:47:19.507-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Print Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Research</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Research</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Do people still read the sports section?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;While
some may think that the sports section in the local newspaper may not be as
popular as a national online component, a new poll begs to differ. M/A/R/C for
the Newspaper National Network interviewed men between the ages of 18-54 to see
how sports news is consumed.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;MediaPost
states that the survey took note of regular newspaper readers and non-regular
newspaper readers alike. Overall, sports enthusiasts ranked the following media
sources for getting news:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;76%
go to newspaper websites&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;69%
go to the print newspaper&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;66%
go to ESPN.com&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;46%
go to league sites&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;45%
go to Yahoo! Sports page&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;45%
go to ESPN Sports Center&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;33%
listen to sports talk radio&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;23%
go to &lt;i&gt;Sports Illustrated &lt;/i&gt;or si.com&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;These
results do point out that even though the online is utilized by a large
audience, the print presence has not gone away completely. Therefore, if you
are still trying to reach that sports enthusiast who is male and between 18-54,
a media mix of the local newspaper sports section and the online counterpart do
make sense.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/XZIRGoM6pfc/do-people-still-read-sports-section.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/do-people-still-read-sports-section.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-2244850254825772454</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-21T10:34:47.370-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Social Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Demographics</category><title>Ethnic breakdown of popular media sites</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Since
social media user demographics shift as new options enter the market or get
more established, it can be useful to advertisers to check and see what the
landscape looks like from time to time. AdvertisingAge recently reported on research
from the Pew Research Center’s Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;From
a poll of 1,802 people, the following was revealed:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Twitter’s
audience&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;26% of black internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;19% of Hispanic internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;14% of white internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;The percentages of users
in the black and white categories have grown since 2010. The Hispanic category
has stayed relatively consistent.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Instagram’s
audience&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;23% of black internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;18% of Hispanic internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l2 level1 lfo2; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;11% of white internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Pinterest’s
audience&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;18% of white internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;10% of Hispanic internet
users&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo3; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Symbol;"&gt;·&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria, serif;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;8% of black internet
users&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/rj4-3Omg9J0/ethnic-breakdown-of-popular-media-sites.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/ethnic-breakdown-of-popular-media-sites.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-1167623484138587487</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-14T09:21:42.462-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tablet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mobile Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Email Marketing</category><title>Do people send emails from a Tablet more than a PC?</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;For
advertisers, it can be really helpful to know which device consumers use to access
their information online. In knowing, it can help an advertiser be more
efficient with targeting the message to the right audience.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The
company Perion, which develops email client software, did some research to find
which devices people use to access their email. Surveying 4,400 iPad users in
the &lt;st1:country-region w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;United States&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:country-region&gt;,
the company focused on where people read and sent emails. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;eMarketer
reports that a higher percentage surveyed chose to read and send emails through
the iPad than other devices like a PC, mobile or other.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Here is
the percentage breakdown of which device people prefer to read emails from:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;55% Tablet (iPad for this study)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;32% PC/Mac&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;10% &lt;st1:city w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;Mobile&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;st1:city w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;3% Other&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The
following is the percentage breakdown of which device people prefer to send
emails from:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;48% Tablet&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;41% PC/Mac&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;9% &lt;st1:city w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;Mobile&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;st1:city w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2% Other&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Also
noted in the survey was that 53% of iPad users check emails anywhere between
1-5 times a day. About 35% check 6-10+ times per day. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It is
important to note that the study only spoke to people who have a Tablet;
therefore, the numbers may be skewed to heavily favoring the device. So, if you
are targeting an audience that is tech savvy, Tablets are high competition to
PC/Macs. Therefore, it is definitely a device one should keep in consideration
when putting together an online and/or mobile campaign for that niche audience.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/Pzz-zHacnQM/do-people-send-emails-from-tablet-more.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/do-people-send-emails-from-tablet-more.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-2100539428246344637</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-03-08T14:26:35.727-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">online TV content</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Should advertisers pull TV budget because of cord cutting?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;A
constant worry that advertisers deal with is how an audience utilizes media.
Are some media dying? Are some growing ahead of others? What makes the most
sense for the target audience? Part of our job is to constantly be immersed in
the latest research. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;One of
the newer worries for advertisers is the new trend of “cord-cutting” TV, which
is when people stop paying for television services like cable or dish and go
online for content. According to a new report by PwC on cord cutting, this is
not a phenomenon that should cause advertisers to pull out of TV entirely.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;MediaPost
reports that while people have been cutting the cord, downgrading
subscriptions, or simply not subscribing, the impact of this to pay TV will be
relatively small over the next five years.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Television
industry leaders stand by the fact that TV advertising still has a measured 37%
of influence over adults 18+. In comparison, newspapers have about 11%,
Internet 6%, and mobile 4% influence for the same target audience. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It’s
estimated that because of the increasing viewership of online TV content,
traditional television viewership will see a .9% decline every year through
2017. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Overall, while
this is a trend advertisers should keep track of, it is not a good enough
reason to encourage pulling all TV ad dollars out of the market.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/0tPuL5M4F7k/should-advertisers-pull-tv-budget.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/03/should-advertisers-pull-tv-budget.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-5787230941736336371</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-28T14:59:18.396-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Research</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Research</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Who is looking online for medical information?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;As an
agency that has quite a few healthcare clients, it really is important for us
to know how people seek out medical information. A new study conducted by Pew
Internet &amp;amp; American Life Project took a closer look at online trends in
researching such information.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The study
was broken down between the general &lt;st1:country-region w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;US&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:country-region&gt; population and those who are
internet users. eMarketer reports that 72% of internet users went online in
search of health answers. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;About
79% of women internet users researched information compared to 65% of men.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;There
wasn’t much difference in research among age groups. The age brackets 18-29 and
30-49 each admitted researching online at 76% and 75% respectively. There was a
small dip among people 50-64 at 71% and people 65+ at 58%.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;The
ethnicity breakdown was 73% white, 69% black and 66% Hispanic. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Approximately
81% of online users who sought out medical information had a household income
between $50,000 - $75,000. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Another
81% were college graduates.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Almost
the majority of the searches were done on a specific disease or medical
problem. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Other
top researched topics were medical treatment/procedure, losing
weight/controlling weight, and health insurance.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;How do
these results help this particular agency in navigating healthcare clients in
the right path? Online campaigns would be best geared towards women between the
ages of 18-64 who are researching specific medical problems. Therefore, we
would not want to run a generic ad message if trying to reach women on a
cardiac campaign. The message will have to be extremely relevant to the online
user.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/Z5TdnxZJy2k/who-is-looking-online-for-medical.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/02/who-is-looking-online-for-medical.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-5143610889873456783</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-21T11:31:08.003-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Print Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>How many coupons were produced in 2012?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Over the
last five years, one word has played a significant part in consumer behavior.
That word is “recession.” Because of the economic recession in 2008, consumers
have based the majority of purchases off of a “need” rather than a “want”. To
cope with the changing buyer intention, coupon manufacturers continue strategic
sampling to see what shoppers really want.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to the Center for Media Research, NCH Marketing Services reported that 305
billion coupons were produced by CPG marketers for 2012. This production count
is the same as 2011; however, the kind of coupons produced were not the same.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In 2012,
there were 4.4% more non-food category coupons than 2011. Some products include
medications, personal care and other household items. There was about 6.5%
fewer food related coupons in 2012. A reason for the shift could be coupons
offer marketers a way to introduce new products and allow consumers to try it
out at a lower cost. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It was
reported that CPG products had about 2.9 billion coupons redeemed in 2012. This
was down 17%; however, 79.8% of consumers reportedly use coupons. What does
this mean for advertisers? Shoppers are still interested in coupons, but it’s
up to marketers to experiment to see what kind of coupons are going to resonate
with its audience and be redeemed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/MpgPMOKqdPY/how-many-coupons-were-produced-in-2012.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-many-coupons-were-produced-in-2012.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-1472767420799256549</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-14T11:01:43.781-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Radio Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Sirius XM radio sees growth in revenues and subscribers</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Satellite
radio has steadily grown since it launched, and 2012 was a year that continued
to see a rise in subscribers and revenue.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;MediaPost
reports that Sirius XM radio had the following 2012 numbers:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Subscribers
grew from 21.9 million in 2011 to 23.9 million.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Total
revenues accumulated to $3.4 billion in 2012 compared to the $3 billion in
2011. This is a 13% increase in revenue.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Just
the ad revenues came in at $82.3 million for 2012. This is an 11.7% increase
from 2011 at $73.7 million.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It is
believed that the reason for the increase in total revenue is largely due to
the growing number of subscribers. Part of that subscriber growth is attributed
to automotive sales. Many brands have Sirius XM in the newer models, and about
45% of the vehicle owners choose to subscribe to the service after the free
trial expires.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It is
important to note that radio can be a medium that reaches consumers right until
he/she leaves the vehicle and goes into a store. Therefore, knowing what
options are available to the consumer is very beneficial for an advertiser.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/qi_tfs_3CAc/sirius-xm-radio-sees-growth-in-revenues.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/02/sirius-xm-radio-sees-growth-in-revenues.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-2894214065827809437</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-07T12:49:05.233-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Psychographics</category><title>How to choose an athlete endorser for your brand</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;A typical
consumer will see or hear an advertisement that has some kind of sports athlete
endorsement. What advertisers need to know is what athletes are the best
endorsers for a certain product or service. According to MediaPost, Nielsen and
E-Poll Market Research recently gave out a list of the athletes that were
deemed to have the best “endorsement potential.” Together, they created an
N-score metric system to measure an athletes’ appeal to a certain category.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;If an
advertiser would like to reach teenagers, then locking down gymnast Gabby
Douglas, swimmer Michael Phelps, gymnast Aly Raisman, basketball player LeBron
James, or soccer player David Beckham as an endorser may help. These athletes
rounded out the top five in the teenager category.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Michael
Phelps, Gabby Douglas, David Beckham, Aly Raisman, and quarterback Tim Tebow
can help advertisers reach the mom category. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In
reaching dads, it is best to look at quarterback Peyton Manning, race car
driver Danica Patrick, Gabby Douglas, baseball player Derek Jeter, or
quarterback Aaron Rodgers for support.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to the list, if an advertiser’s target audience is people 65+, Gabby Douglas,
Tim Tebow or golfer Phil Mickelson may flatter the brand.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It’s
interesting to note Gabby Douglas is the only athlete that ranks top five
amongst the teenager, mom, dad, and people 65+ categories. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Overall,
this just proves one of the most important points in advertising- know your
audience. Choosing someone who is well-liked by teenagers and having them
endorse a product for a person 65+ may not make sense for the product, the
athlete, and most importantly, the audience.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/k12tZX-Wc_0/how-to-choose-athlete-endorser-for-your.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/02/how-to-choose-athlete-endorser-for-your.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-9042769165497497113</guid><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-02-01T11:17:35.091-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Theatre Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>See a Super Bowl ad in a theater near you</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In the
few weeks between the New Year and Valentine’s Day, advertisers and Americans
alike look forward to one major event- The Super Bowl. For some, they watch it
for the sports, others for the entertainers, and lastly, for the commercials. If
the highly anticipated commercials were released earlier than February 3&lt;sup&gt;rd&lt;/sup&gt;,
would it take the fun out of it? Kia Motors America apparently doesn’t think
so.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to MediaPost, Kia is going to release its Super Bowl commercial early in movie
theaters. This will be the second year the car-maker has implemented this
strategy. The ad will be released in two parts across 19,000 theaters
nationwide through the NCM Media Networks. The first part will be a :15 teaser
running Friday, January 25&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; to lead up to the full :60 spot premier
on Friday, February 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;. The ad will run during the FirstLook
pre-show program. Titled “Space Babies” the commercial will promote Kia’s 2014
Sorento CUV. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Running a
Super Bowl commercial in theaters prior to the actual game has never been done
before until Kia. To see the effectiveness of this strategy, NCM Media Networks
and Nielsen did some post-game research from the 2012 game. People who only saw
the ad during the game had a 46% unaided recall rate. For those who saw the ad
in the theaters prior and on TV during the game, the unaided recall rate
increased to 70%. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;What you
can take from this is a strong strategy can pay off. Letting people see your
Super Bowl commercial before the event can help generate awareness and anticipation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/RM3Du9k1QwI/see-super-bowl-ad-in-theater-near-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/see-super-bowl-ad-in-theater-near-you.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-8520923633220577818</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-24T12:11:08.373-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Tablet</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Consumers turn to tablets after watching a TV commercial</title><description>

&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It’s no
secret that a media mix allows advertisers to get the message in front of the
audience on multiple screens, multiple times per day. What is the best mix?
Honestly, it depends. It depends on the audience, their habits, their values,
their location, etc. There is no “right” answer. However, studies are
continually seeking out good combinations.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to eMarketer, a new study has been conducted by Harris Interactive for The
Search Agency about TV and tablet usage. The survey showed that television
prompts users to research a product or service on a tablet.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings; mso-bidi-font-family: Wingdings; mso-fareast-font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list: Ignore;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;71%
of the people 18-34 polled will use his/her tablet to look up information on a
product/service after seeing a television commercial.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings; mso-bidi-font-family: Wingdings; mso-fareast-font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list: Ignore;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;81%
people 35-44 &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings; mso-bidi-font-family: Wingdings; mso-fareast-font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list: Ignore;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;54%
people 45-54 &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt 0.5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -0.25in;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings; mso-bidi-font-family: Wingdings; mso-fareast-font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;&lt;span style="mso-list: Ignore;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: &amp;quot;Times New Roman&amp;quot;; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;56%
people 55+&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;To add
support to this outcome, Millward and Dynamic Logic did another study and found
that people were motivated to turn to his/her smartphone or tablet to research
brands, apps, websites, social networking pages, etc. by recommendation at a 46%
response rate. Television tied for second with brand in-store online at 38%. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;

&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Advertisers
should take this information and make sure that if television is in the media
mix, then the client’s website, social networking sites, mobile sites, etc.
need to be aligned with the same message. That way, if a person does research
on the brand after seeing a commercial, the rest of the resources will
complement the initial introduction.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/Xfbro9gqtZY/consumers-turn-to-tablets-after.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/consumers-turn-to-tablets-after.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-4369064799403156506</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-18T13:19:39.583-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mobile Applications</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mobile Advertising</category><title>New Years Resolutions... is there an app?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Well into
the third week of the New Year, firm resolutions set on the 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; may
not be as solid now. According to a new study by Prosper Mobile Insights,
people are looking to outside help from his/her smartphone to keep resolutions
intact.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;For
example, the survey noted that 24% of men and 30% of women intended to use
his/her smartphone or tablet to help keep New Years resolutions. The top three
categories/resolutions that people were attempting with their phones were being
on time, keeping in touch with people, and budgeting.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;eMarketer
reports that 2013 may mark the first year in which smartphones make up 50% of
the mobile phone market. That being said, experts believe it is likely that more
people will become dependent on the devices’ capabilities. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Advertisers
can take this information to better reach their audience. For example, if a
person is interested in budgeting his/her money better, it may make sense for a
bank to sponsor an app that helps track a budget. It’s up to the advertiser to
really know the target audience and their behaviors.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/EkiBEtwlHfU/new-years-resolutions-is-there-app.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-years-resolutions-is-there-app.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-2774485318072166164</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-10T16:15:57.348-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Economy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Psychographics</category><title>What do you know about Generation X?</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;What do
you know about the spending trends of the typical American Generation Xer?
Since it is sometimes called the “ignored generation,” you may not know too
much about it. The Center for Media Research recently summarized a new study by
SymphonyIRI called Q3 2012 MarketPulse. In it, it highlights the buying
characteristics of American’s between the ages of 35 and 44.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Unlike its
predecessors Baby Boomers and seniors, Generation X tends be more price conscious.
&amp;nbsp;This is more in line to the Millennials.
The study proves this with the following results:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;37%
of GenX and 45% of Millennials are willing to buy brands that are on sale over
the preferred brands. Boomers and seniors were less likely at 27% and 22%
respectively.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;32%
of GenX and 39% of Millennials will select products that will create the most
meals for the lowest cost. Boomers and seniors were charted at 27% and 19%.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;33%
of GenX and 35% of Millennials purchased products because of the discounts
given from the loyalty card. The study showed only 25% of Boomers and 16% of seniors
did the same.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;How is
this information helpful to an advertiser? If your target demographic happens
to fall within the Generation X age group, it may be a good idea to highlight
the price of your product or service. Also, coupons or discounts may be a way
to get the frugal generation to sample what you are selling.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/66331Rfhrpg/what-do-you-know-about-generation-x.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/what-do-you-know-about-generation-x.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-5981669308312647519</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2013-01-04T16:32:05.142-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Outdoor Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Times Square billboards have a hefty price tag</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;2012 is a
thing of the past, and 2013 is here. While billions rang in the New Year at
parties, at home with loved ones, or simply doing laundry, one thing is for
certain, millions were tuning in to “New Year’s Rockin Eve” at Times Square in &lt;st1:city w:st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;New York City&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt;. Besides
watching the ball drop, did you notice anything else in the square? The
billboards perhaps? Ever give a thought to how much those billboards cost on a
yearly basis?&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According
to AdvertisingAge, the billboards on top of One Times Square in NYC are some of
the most expensive outdoor advertising in the world. In the Wall Street
Journal, it’s reported that Dunkin’ Donuts spends approximately $3.6 million a
year for the digital sign. Brewer Anheuser-Busch spends $3.4 million a year on
its board. There are some reports that annual contracts could be as lucrative
as $4 million. This shows the incremental rate increase since in 2005, the
average yearly investment for a billboard on One Times Square was $2.4 million.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;How can
an advertiser justify that kind of investment for just the space and not even
the production charges? Consider this, if just looking at “New Year’s Rockin
Eve” at Times Square, there were 22.6 million viewers tuned in to watch 2011
turn into 2012. Dunkin’ Donuts would have paid about $0.16 for each
person/impression. That doesn’t include the millions that visit &lt;st1:place w:st="on"&gt;Times Square&lt;/st1:place&gt; throughout the year or the thousands that
were in attendance that night. Even if a tenth of those 22.6 million viewers (2.26
million) bought a 1lb bag of coffee for $8.99, that’s $20.3 million in revenue,
and $16.7 million in profits. Makes it easier to understand the gamble, doesn’t
it?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/M1RPb5Uljgs/times-square-billboards-have-hefty.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/times-square-billboards-have-hefty.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-568716003400469488</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-28T13:03:24.040-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">television advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Research</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Research company and social media giant join together to create a new ratings service</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Communicating is an innate characteristic
of being human. With the introduction of social media networking, we have been
able to reach out to more people instantly than ever before. Conversations that
would have taken place in the office or over the phone to discuss last night’s
TV show are now on statuses, posts, tweets, etc. In order for advertisers to
stay current, The Nielsen Company and Twitter have joined forces to create a
rating system to measure social TV activity.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According to MediaPost and
AdvertisingAge, the new social media TV rating service will be called The
Nielsen Twitter TV Rating. It will measure the total audience for social TV
activity on Twitter exclusively. With the rating service, it will include both
the people who comment on TV programming and others who have been exposed to
the comments.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It’s reported that Twitter
currently has 140 million active users which equates to about one billion
tweets every two-and-a-half days.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Industry professionals are hoping
that this could establish a stable metric that can help define how social
activity and television work together. As a result, better marketing efforts
can be placed to create stronger programming.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/_bHfNM7SX7E/research-company-and-social-media-giant.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/research-company-and-social-media-giant.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-1663597194475115691</guid><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 22:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-20T16:24:31.474-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>2012 Cyber Monday reaches record high and what advertisers can learn from it</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria; font-size: large;"&gt;We are in the midst of the
expensive holiday season. Between setting up budgets for the next fiscal year,
finalizing the accounting books for this year, shopping for presents for
family, friends, clients, co-workers and trying to make it home on time, it can
get hectic for consumers and advertisers alike. A part of our job that never
rests is research. In that, it enables us to know what is going on in the media
landscape and gives us the foresight to create the best possible media plan. That
being said, reports have been released in regards to this year’s Cyber Monday.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;According to eMarketer, comScore
reports that ecommerce sales on Cyber Monday have consistently grown over the
past seven years. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2006: $608 million&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2007: $733 million (a 21%
increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2008: $846 million (a 15%
increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2009: $887 million (a 5% increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2010: $1.03 billion (a 16%
increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2011: $1.25 billion (a 22%
increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;2012: $1.47 billion (a 17%
increase)&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;eMarketer has predicted that the
2012 holiday season online spending is going to reach approximately $54.47
billion, which is about a quarter of the year’s forecasted US retail ecommerce
sales.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;What does this mean for
advertisers? If you are in the retail category, it means that a good behavioral
targeting online campaign during November and December could be very lucrative
for your return on investment. If you are in a different business category,
like healthcare, you may experience smaller inventory selections and slower
traffic. If that does happen to you, take heart and remember that inventory will
likely be more readily available in January. The bottom line is know your
audience and the trends in order to make the most of your advertising
investment. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/oiMjYxitlmk/2012-cyber-monday-reaches-record-high.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/2012-cyber-monday-reaches-record-high.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-6507957990895473128</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-14T08:20:50.868-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Email Marketing</category><title>Research helps B2B advertisers with email blast subject lines</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;As an advertiser, have you debated
how to start out a subject line in an email blast? Is it too long, too short,
just right? How is one to know? Luckily, if you are in the business to business
(B2B) industry, some new research by Adestra can shed a little light on your
dilemma. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Reported by the Center for Media
Research, Adestra found that subject lines that are either less than 30
characters or more than 90 characters produced the best results. Email blast
subject lines that fell between that area were classified as the “dead zone.”
Apparently, the shorter subject lines produce premium results for transactional
or direct-response type emails. These lines also proved to have higher
engagement with readers. The longer lines worked best for emails that were more
information-based in that it could better communicate benefits of the
advertiser.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Also researched was personalized
subject lines and how users relate to them. While they do have an immediate
engagement, it can be just as quickly lost if the email content is not
personalized. &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Overall, advertisers can not
expect a cookie cutter email blast to work. Experimenting with subject lines
and personalization of content will enable advertisers to know what works best
for the target audience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/i89mCHUoWFk/research-helps-b2b-advertisers-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/research-helps-b2b-advertisers-with.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-9200505798584619481</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-12-07T09:21:48.051-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cable Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Cable news networks see audience increase in November</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;With this
being an election year, it comes as no surprise that cable networks were
affected by the coverage. According to MediaPost, some cable news networks saw
a boost in viewership during the month of November. Regardless of the spike, ESPN
still maintained overall dominance.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;ESPN
averaged 3 million viewers during prime time in the month of November; however,
this is down approximately 16% from November 2011. Coming in second for
viewership was the USA Network at 2.6 million, which is down 16% from last year
as well. Fox News came in at third for 2.5 million.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;The cable
news networks had the following gains throughout the political season:&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;Fox
News: 2.5 million viewers: 46% gain&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;MSNBC:
1.3 million viewers: 75% gain&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in; text-indent: -.25in;"&gt;
&lt;!--[if !supportLists]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Wingdings;"&gt;§&lt;span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman';"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;!--[endif]--&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;CNN:
1.1 million viewers: 63% gain&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;It will
be interesting to see in the upcoming months if the news networks can hold onto
the increased viewership or if it will go away now that the election is
completed.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/W4kSjfaWiSI/cable-news-networks-see-audience.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/cable-news-networks-see-audience.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5643665549901327722.post-5071515379712728000</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-11-29T15:13:15.723-06:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Online Advertising</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Social Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kansas City Media Buying</category><title>Some consumers believe content marketing to be misleading</title><description>&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;One of
the hardest things about planning advertising is how to make sure your message
is in front of the right people at the right time and at the right amount of
frequency. Otherwise, you may miss your target audience completely or worse,
annoy them. Focusing on social media, how are advertisers supposed to reach an
audience without being deceptive which can lead to negative brand views?&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;A recent
study conducted by MediaBrix found that US internet users think some online content
marketing misleading and in turn, off-putting. eMarketer reports that about 86%
of those polled believed online videos to be content but were actually sponsored
ads. It was reported that 85% of those misled by the sponsored ads either
thought of the brand negatively or it had no change of opinion.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;Looking
at Facebook (57%) and Twitter (45%), users felt that sponsored stories and
promoted Tweets were misrepresented to be content.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="MsoNormal"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-family: Cambria;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: large;"&gt;In
general, people do not like to feel as though they have been duped. Therefore,
it’s critical for advertisers to really evaluate the best way to present
messaging in an honest way that will bolster brand loyalty. Social media is
definitely a large part to marketing now; advertisers must be mindful of how it’s
utilized.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: 13pt;"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MediaResearchandTrends/~3/JAaCH2UW8lA/some-consumers-believe-content.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Ruth Burke and Associates)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://weknowmedia.blogspot.com/2012/11/some-consumers-believe-content.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
