Mercury Falling

JEA REDUCING MERCURY EMISSIONS!

2008-03-10T07:14:00.000-07:00

This is the biggest story Mercury Falling will hopefully ever post. And probably the last. If this was a newspaper, the headline across the top would be huge -- like the classic from The Onion's "Our Dumb Century" on the beginning of Wold War II which featured huge print for the headline "WA-" and then below it wrote "(headline continued on page 2)"

JEA IS LOWERING MERCURY EMISSIONS!

As a loyal reader of Mercury Falling, you can see every other post on here concerns how much JEA emits from its coal-burning power plants. And from any public information you can find, the answer is...a lot. But here's the kicker. Thanks to federal regulations known as the Clean Air Interstate Rule, calling for lower emissions of other pollutants like Nitrous Oxide and Sulfur Dioxide, JEA is installing equipment known as selective catalytic reducers (similar to the catalytic converter in your car) that will lower mercury emissions by as much as 90%, perhaps more. To be more specific. Northside Generating Station has already installed this equipment and St. Johns River Power Park is set to be fully up and running with the pollution-reducing by January 2009. These mercury emissions are estimates, so in addition, St. Johns River Power Park will have active monitoring technology installed as well by January 2009, to comply with the federal Clean Air Mercury Rule. Here is a more technical description, straight from JEA:

St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP) includes an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) and a flue gas desulfurization system (FGDS). SJRPP is currently installing Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) primarily for the removal of nitrogen oxides. However, just like the other controls already deployed, the SCR aids in the removal of mercury. With the addition of the SCRs in 2009, SJRPP expects to be removing 90% of the mercury from its air emissions. In addition, Northside Generating Station Units 1 & 2 already have a boiler technology known as circulating fluidized bed (CFB)combustors, complimented with dry flue gas scrubbing, that are currently removing 90% or more of the mercury from their emissions. Ninety percent (90%) is the level of mercury removal that many environmental groups sought from the federal government during its promulgation of the first rule ever to regulate mercury emissions from power plants.

SO WHAT DOES ALL THIS MEAN?

The big picture...cleaner air and water for Jacksonville! Hooray!
Maybe this blog was pointless? The blog did not achieve its intended effect, convince JEA, the city council, and the city that its a good idea to produce cleaner power. And most of what this blog reported about JEA was inaccurate and not up-to-date thanks due to inaccurate information that was publicly available.
Federal regulations are extremely important. It seems that the only reason JEA is reducing mercury pollution (as well as Nitrous Oxide and Sulfur Dioxide) is because federal regulations are forcing JEA to be cleaner. Without them, these pollutants would still be pumped into Jacksonville's air, and at least in the case of mercury, fall into Jacksonville's water at unknown expense to residents' health and the local economy. Any time you hear a politician berate the federal government and so how ineffectual it is, consider this point. Any time you hear a business complain of regulations, consider this point. And, of course, VOTE! In every race. Always.
Should JEA ever act solely because it is the best thing to do for the community? Again, seems like the only reason that JEA is reducing pollution is because Washington told it to. But the city of Jacksonville owns JEA, not Washington. So should, and will, and can JEA ever take actions like this simply because it is best for the community? Or will JEA only act when the federal government forces it to? Don't have any clue to the answer, but the question is worth asking.
JEA needs to communicate more with its customers/owners. As a monopoly, JEA has recently been criticized for seeking to spend $7 million over the next 5 years on advertising. But, clearly, JEA is not even doing a good job of letting the public know the positive things it is doing in the community, let alone seeking to change behavior (i.e., teaching users the how and why to conserve) that can save the utility the huge expense of having to add new capacity. There have been several articles in the local media as well as big pushes by groups to publicize how much mercury JEA emits. If JEA had a good story to tell, that it is lowering pollutants, it should have done so. As far as Mercury Falling knows, the entry you're currently reading is the only publicly available information about JEA reducing mercury emissions. Just search "JEA mercury emissions" and you'll see all the information still out there, unrefuted, that shows JEA is a huge mercury polluter. JEA has been reaching out to the community about its stewardship in general and appears to be attempting to do more (Mercury Falling was at a meeting called to inform a few groups about the proposed Southside Generating Station) and should be applauded for that. But, hey, let JEA have the money to educate the community on saving energy and money. And then let's hold JEA accountable for doing a good job on that.
Goodbye, Mercury Falling. This will be the last post of Mercury Falling since JEA is reducing its emissions by 90%, which is all Mercury Falling was looking for anyway.

From Michael Skok, Candidate for President

2008-01-22T10:20:00.000-08:00

The ideal solution to the mercury problem would be to store the waste mercury in a giant underground tank. Then use electricity from solar power generator plants, and/or whatever it takes, to recycle the waste mercury into useable products.

From Daniel Imperato, Candidate for President

2008-01-21T08:11:00.000-08:00

I am not an expert on mercury, but if this is dangerous and having effects on our wetlands and children it should have beed addressed and something done about it already. That is the problem with Washington and Democrats and Republicans -- nothing will change except for less or none in your pockects. We need a third party. I am ready to defend the people. We need your support www.imperato2008.com

Fish Fog Hot Spot: Great name for a band, but bad news for Jacksonville?

2007-12-13T10:45:00.000-08:00

What is a fish fog hot spot? And does this label fit Jacksonville? Read on...our sad story begins in a recent article in the Pensacola News Journal, "Emissions down, but not at coal-burning plants," which said that almost every industry in the nation has reduced mercury content except the power industry.

Why should you care?

As many as 600,000 babies may be born in the U.S. each year with irreversible brain damage because pregnant mothers ate mercury-contaminated fish, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. Medical researchers are just beginning to explore the effect of mercury exposure on adults that leaves some in a disorienting "fish fog."

Why should you care if you live in Jacksonville?
JEA is a major emitter of mercury in Jacksonville. And while the EPA is coming out with regulations in the next few years to lower mercury emissions nationwide, this "cap and trade" system could mean that JEA could just buy indulgences instead of actually lowering emissions. Would that mean higher rates with the same high mercury emissions? And is Jacksonville already a fish fog hot spot? According to the article...

The EPA mercury program also allows power plant operators to purchase mercury pollution credits from cleaner plants. Critics warn the trading system could let the worst polluters off the hook and foster "hot spots" with dangerously high levels of mercury.

Will these EPA regulations help lower mercury emissions in Jacksonville?

James Pew, an attorney for Earthjustice, calls the EPA rule a "free pass for the polluters." It "means more mercury pollution, more waters made unsafe for fishing and more young children made susceptible to mercury contamination," he said.

Who says there are no mountains in Jacksonville?

2007-11-16T10:15:00.000-08:00

While the highest point in Jacksonville might only be 54 feet, we do have mountains here. You could say we import them. According to Appalachian Voices, there are two coal-fired power plants in the JEA service area that have been purchasing coal directly from mountaintop removal operations in Central Appalachia in the last five years - St Johns River Power Park and Cedar Bay Generating LP. Not only does Appalachia lose its mountains, but by burning that coal, Jacksonville's waterways get all that mercury that's been locked up in those mountains. Shipping Appalachian mountains to Jacksonville...what's next, sending the St. Johns River to South Florida? Oh, yeah, there are plans for that, too.

Pin this badge on your site.

Temtped by the Fruit of Another

2007-11-13T14:15:00.000-08:00

Since Florida is a noncompetitive electricity market, residents of Jacksonville are stuck in a long-term relationship with JEA and its mercury spewing ways. But, oh, to take a look around the state and see FPL - it seems so attractive. While JEA keeps spewing the mercury using a fuel from Charles Dickens era, FPL has kept up with the times (those are FPL's windmills in the picture). For example, FPL Group Inc. plans to invest $2.4 billion over several years in zero-mercury-emissions technology -- solar-thermal and other renewable energy products. FPL Group is making this investment while providing a 36% total shareholder return. As a citizen of Jacksonville, and therefore a "shareholder" of city-owned JEA, what kind of return are you getting?

Higher rates and mercury emissions. And since Florida is a noncompetitive market, JEA has no competition. That's why strong government oversight is so important. Email the mayor and city council, and tell them you're tired of JEA's mercury emissions and its reliance on Charles Dickens era coal. As for now, our relationship with JEA is like a Britney Spears song...toxic.

These are Some Fly-Ash Bricks

2007-11-05T10:09:00.000-08:00

We already know that JEA spews a lot of mercury into the air. But with no known plans to improve its emissions technology or reduce its dependency on coal (which by itself would be a good idea, since coal prices have more than doubled over the past four years and coal faces deteriorating grades and rising costs according to today's Wall Street Journal), how can JEA mitigate all these mercury emissions? Well, check out this innovation, reported in Time magazine:

Kicking Ash
Each year coal-fired power plants dump millions of tons of mercury-laced ash into landfills. Henry Liu has found a way to compress this waste into fly-ash bricks that are eco-friendlier than their clay counterparts. The bricks conserve energy (they're made at room temperature), and tests suggest they may even suck mercury out of the surrounding air.
Available 2009

JEA should license this technology and produce its own bricks for the area's booming construction industry. Not only are there public health benefits for such a move, but it would be a new revenue stream for rate-increase happy JEA.

Photo by heyu1021

Power plants race to reduce mercury emissions. JEA stuck on sidelines?

2007-11-01T13:18:00.000-07:00

America's power plants are
racing to reduce mercury
emissions ahead of
new regulations.

Is JEA even in the race?

Power plants and other industries that emit mercury are racing to clean up their act before the EPA's Clean Air Mercury Rule goes into effect ("Mercury emitters rush to meet new U.S. rules," USA Today). For example, pollution-control technology at Dominion Resources' coal-burning Chesterfield, Virginia plant, combined with burning coal lower in mercury, will cut the emissions of mercury and other pollutants by an estimated 90%.

And what of JEA, our city-owned utility? Is JEA's highest mercury emissions in the state (according to Florida PIRG) really in our city's best interests? What are JEA's plans for lowering mercury emissions?

Do Florida governments look to cancer as a model for urban planning?

2007-10-18T15:00:00.000-07:00

Cancer has many similarities to Florida's local and state governments failed attempts to manage growth:

Aggressive
Cancer - cells grow without respect to normal limits
Florida's governments - developments are approved without regard for the affect they will have on roads, schools, water quality and supply, sewer systems, police and fire protection, libraries, wildlife, open and recreational space, and quality of life

Invasive
Cancer - invades and destroys adjacent tissue
Florida's governments - Florida has lost at least 84,000 acres of wetlands in the past 15 years

Metastatic
Cancer - spreads to other locations in the body
Florida's governments - Central Florida wants to siphon off 262 million gallons of water a day from the St. Johns River and its tributaries

What this means for Jacksonville
In addition to the above ills, cancerous growth in Jacksonville means JEA has to provide much MORE electricity from its coal-fired plants (and is even thinking of building a new one) which means more dangerous mercury emissions.

The solution: Take power from the government and give it to the people
Let the people decide want kind of growth they want in Florida, instead of the politicians. Visit floridahometowndemocracy.com to download, sign, and send in a petition to put the Florida Hometown Democracy Amendment on the ballot, giving voters a chance to decide if they want a say in Florida's future.

Is JEA gambling with our financial future?

2007-09-17T14:03:00.000-07:00

The medical risks of JEA's current and proposed coal-fired power plants have already been heavily discussed on Mercury Falling. But what about the financial risks? As your read the below clip from today's issue of The Wall Street Journal, keep in mind that since JEA is city-owned, every resident of Jacksonville is, in essence, an "investor."

Cuomo Subpoenas Five Energy Firms
New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo is investigating five energy companies to determine whether plans to create coal-fired power plants present an undisclosed financial risk to investors. Mr. Cuomo sent subpoenas seeking internal documents to AES Corp., Dominion Resources Inc., Dynegy Inc., Peabody Energy Corp., and Xcel Energy Inc. The attorney general's office suggested the companies could take a hit if federal lawmakers tighten controls on coal-fired plants, which emit carbon dioxide, among pollutants scientists have linked to global warming.

Does JEA have money to burn?

2007-09-08T20:10:00.000-07:00

Well, it might be healthier for Jacksonville than all the coal it burns. But seriously, according to the September 4th issue of Folioweekly, in an article entitled "Bill of Goods," JEA has collected $208 million more than it needed from customers. This, in spite of the fact that JEA promised it would lower rates if fuel prices dropped. The math was done by Bruce Strauss, current retiree and former investigator for the IRS.

What could JEA do with all this filthy lucre? Well, for one, how about clean up its filthy coal plants? Or invest more in renewable energy, from solar, wind, or tidal sources? That way, the cost of "fuel" will never go up, and JEA will no longer have to raise our rates so much, as it does every time coal prices skyrocket.

But wait mystery lovers, there's more. Is there a nefarious plot behind all this extra loot? Folioweekly suggests the city may be looking to sell JEA, and the extra money could help the sale price. That, according to Art Shad, chairman of the City Council's Finance Committee would be a bad idea. According to Folioweekly..."Shad's concern is that profits from the company would go to shareholders outside the area. Shareholders would also want to see a profit and would increase utility rates in order to increase dividends." Bottom line is, if JEA is city-owned, its number one priority is to us, the residents of Jacksonville (although you couldn't tell that from its action, specifically emitting so much toxic mercury).

The high, hidden costs of low-down, dirty coal

2007-09-05T12:51:00.000-07:00

Is your JEA bill getting higher and higher every month? Well, that big number followed by a dollar sign is only telling part of the story of the true cost of Jacksonville's coal-fired power plants. Here is a key excerpt from a recent article in The Washington Post:

"According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a scientific advocacy group, annual emissions from a typical coal plant include 10,000 tons of sulfur dioxide, the major cause of acid rain; 10,200 tons of nitrogen oxide, a major contributor to smog; 500 tons of small particles, which cause lung damage and other respiratory problems; 225 pounds of arsenic; 114 pounds of lead; and many other toxic heavy metals, including 170 pounds of mercury, which can cause birth defects, brain damage and other ailments."

And that's just the local coasts of coal. From coalminers' lives to destroyed streams and forests in Appalachia, coal is expensive indeed. Click here to read Jeff Goodell's full article about measuring the true coast of coal, "King Coal: What It Costs Us."

From Charles McBurney, candidate for Florida House of Representatives, District 16

2007-08-23T09:41:00.000-07:00

We all know mercury is a dangerous chemical and needs the concentrated attention of JEA. Like you, I am concerned about the alledged violations of the Clean Water Act and note that recent lawsuits have been brought to get some of these matters resolved.

As I am sure you are aware, many problems plague our river. Neil Armingeon, our St. Johns Riverkeeper, seems to be aware of the wastewater being discharged into the river and we applaud his "zero discharge" goal.

I plan to work for funds for the continual clean up of the St. Johns
River when I am elected to the State House of Representatives. I would take an active position of monitoring the efforts of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to ensure everything possible is done to give Jacksonville safe, clean water.

Thanks again for your inquiry. I commend groups such as yours who are concerned and work hard for the health and well being of all our citizens.

Yours truly,
Charles McBurney

JEA: Now Delivering Toxic Mercury Right to your Front Door?

2007-08-06T08:12:00.000-07:00

By now, you probably know of JEA's abundant emissions of toxic mercury from its coal-fired power plants on the Northside. Just in case that wasn't heinous enough for you, JEA might now be sprinkling this toxic substance on the road in front of your house. According to a recent Folioweekly article (7/31/07, "Burning Questions: A JEA road project raises concerns about impacts to environment and health"), JEA is using a material derived from a coal ash byproduct in local road projects (basically some of the stuff left over after it burns the coal in its plants).

Folioweekly goes on to say, "Though the use of ash in concrete, gypsum board and road construction is permitted by the federal and state governments, and promoted as a green way to reuse waste, the ash does contain toxins, including mercury, lead, arsenic, and cadmium." And in one project in Mandarin, it seems like JEA basically sprinkled this toxic fairy dust on to the road and let it blow around for a few weeks in a residential neighborhood.

Of course, this isn't all a bad idea. Reusing waste saves money, time, and resources. But apparently JEA is selling this product, called EZBase, based on one test it conducted itself. There have been no independent tests, which for a product with this much potential toxic downside seems irresponsible. And it doesn't seem like the product is always applied responsibly, if its true that JEA as been letting this potentially toxic dust blow around a residential neighborhood in Mandarin.

Perhaps environmental advocate and mechanical engineer Nelson Helmuth said it best, "The greatest story never told is how we're polluting ourselves to death in this country. In the industrial world, the asthma rate is going up, the cancer rate is going up, the rate of children with attention deficit disorder is going up. We are poisoning ourselves."

The Wind: His Potential Is Ours

2007-08-01T09:53:00.000-07:00

How about some wind power in Jacksonville? With the ocean and the river, we seem to have enough. And best of all, no expensive coal to buy and zero mercury emissions.

The secret lives of mercury testers

2007-07-31T10:45:00.000-07:00

I just wanted to contribute to this discussion as I think it is very important and one of those ‘bury our heads in the sand and hope for the best’ issues. For a little background, I should say that I work for one of the agencies that collect fish tissue for Hg analysis around the state and I in fact used to sample fish being brought back to the docks. Given my experience, I have followed the data from collection, to analysis, to reporting and know of glaring gaps in the process, particularly the reporting. I have spoken to people at the various agencies involved to get more information on the analysis, process and reporting.

Here is how mercury testing is done for saltwater fish. Biologists collect fish tissue from around the state according to protocol and list of target species. Samples are processed and sent to FDEP for analysis. There is (or was when I was collecting fish tissue a few years ago) such a bottleneck at the analysis level mainly due to staff shortage that they can’t handle too many samples. There are field labs and personnel around the entire state so essentially all areas get sampled, some more than others, some species more than others. A species needs to have at least 20 samples processed in an area to get analyzed and reported and then an average of the Hg in the tissue is analyzed against the legal standard. Having looked at the data, not the raw data, but a summary of the data, the range of mercury in any one given sample can have a pretty large range and may differ in the various regions throughout the state. Generally, the Everglades and Florida Bay have higher mercury levels.

Some other points of interest:
· If you go out and catch a spotted seatrout, for instance, there is no real way to know how much mercury is in it since the range is so large. However, generally, the bigger the fish the more mercury it likely has accumulated. So even though a fish has a lower advisory level, the individual fish may have very little Hg or way over the ‘safe’ limits.

· Just because a fish isn’t on the ‘advisory’ list, it doesn’t necessarily mean that that species is low in mercury. It requires the minimum 20 samples (which can be accumulated since 1989). In other words, an advisory may be based on older data from the 1990s solely or in part. However, since the late 1990s, mercury sampling throughout the state has been ramped up and most of the Hg analysis is based on more recent fish. But there are or have been fish left off the state advisory list that in all likelihood should be there. For instance, swordfish are notorious for their high mercury levels but are (or were in 2005) left off the states’ list. This is simply because there weren’t enough samples to analyze. This is frustrating to me on a personal level since I actually sampled over 20 swordfish from one commercial boat but those samples got lost in the shipping (I won’t condemn the company here!).

· Mercury bioaccumulates in fish tissue and other seafood like blue crab, and stays in our bodies when we consume fish with mercury for some time. However, we can expel the mercury through excretion and sweat. So if you eat a fish with Hg and do not consume any more Hg for ~2 months, that Hg should have left your body. The problem becomes when the intake becomes or remains higher than the output. So our family (mother of child-bearing age and an almost-3- year old) closely monitors our intake of fish in our diets, pay particular attention to what species, try not to eat fish if we don’t know what it is.

· Fish that are imported are not sampled for mercury, at least not to my knowledge. Not only is it very difficult for the consumer to determine 1) where their meal at a restaurant is from, 2) if it was farmed, 3) what the actual species is, 4) how much Hg, and whatever else is in it. There are growing incidents in Florida , and here in Tallahassee , where DNA tests from fish on the menu are not actually what they say they are. An article in the St Pete Times a few years ago showed that about 50% of the sampled snapper from about 15 area restaurants (in Tampa ) were not snapper. The good news is that most of the fish sold as snapper or grouper, if it is not actually that species, it is probably farm raised tilapia – much lower in Hg but if it is farm-raised probably has a whole suite of other chemicals.

· It has been claimed that the half of the mercury in our local and state waters comes from across the globe. However long and far Hg travels and gets deposited, it is clear that it just doesn’t get deposited locally. So coal plants in our area will not only affect our waters, but waters downwind. (Even though I am ~45 miles from the Perry paper plant, on some days in the morning I can smell the poisoned air flowing. Generally on cold winter mornings).

· There is wealth of information online from the federal governments (EPA, FDA, etc), scientific reports, etc that claim that some, even high, Hg levels in our body (for male adults, females not bearing children) are not that bad for us and that the health benefits for eating fish tissue (omega-3 fatty acids) far outweigh the consequences of consuming Hg. However, some fish species should be avoided all together (shark, swordfish, kingfish (king mackerel), Spanish mackerel, tuna, etc). Whether this information is put out there to confuse the public, to not create a panic about Hg, or whatever I am not sure. Some of it is misleading but I still wonder what the effects of eating too much Hg for the average male adult is compared to the gain in eating fish. It is too bad that we have to make that sort of risk-benefit analysis when we know that if we quit polluting the earth with Hg, we wouldn’t have to make that decision. In my opinion, putting that kind of risk-benefit out there just skirts around the problem of input into the environment.

· A Chicago Tribune investigative report of a few years ago showed that mercury levels sold in fish at restaurants throughout the country had exceeded the EPA limits. They also found that basically all canned tuna products have the same high levels of Hg and even though one is supposed to be lower in Hg due to the species it really is not.

· ‘head in the sand, hope for the best’ – a game of hot potato is played by the state agencies on Hg levels. FWC collects the fish tissue and turns it over to the FDEP. FWC doesn’t want to acknowledge mercury levels in all of the regulated fish species are on the advisory list and some very important species shouldn’t be eaten at all by anyone (e.g., king mackerel). FDEP tests and analyzes the data and passes the info to FDOH. DOH creates the advisories based on their level of acceptance. DEP and DOH takes no ownership of the Hg in fish tissue, they just are the messenger, FWC just samples the fish. No one wants to take ownership, acknowledge the widespread problem, work on lowering mercury levels, truly inform anglers and consumers about Hg in fish, regulate fish species based on mercury content, allow imported fish to be sold and consumed untested. There is some minimal effort to prosecute violators who do not label or market the fish species correctly, but much more needs to be done (this could be argued for many reasons.

· I think it is up to the consumers (anglers, people who eat/but retail fish products, environmentalists, etc) to unite and force the government to beef up its testing and reporting. At the very least, consumers should be provided with fact sheets on mercury anywhere fish are available for retail or consumption. It should be included in angling guides, through state fish regulation publications, etc. If we don’t demand it, it won’t happen because that will just allow the heads to be stuck in the sand.

Chad

Thanks to coal-burning power plants, the fish on the left might be more dangerous than the fish on the right

2007-07-27T11:05:00.000-07:00

The can of tuna might be more dangerous thanks to mercury, most of which is polluted by coal-burning power plants, like those on Jacksonville's Northside. And while tuna isn't the only fish that might come chock full of mercury (in fact, even shark has mercury in it), canned tuna is the most popular fish in the U.S. And, certainly, way more people eat tuna and are possibly exposed to this toxin than are ever bitten by a shark.

Self magazine recently published an excellent article about the dangers of mercury - "How safe is what's in this can?"

If you don't have time to read the full article, here's a look at some key takeaways and excepts:

Mercury's effects on your health...

"When a pregnant woman consumes mercury, it passes through the placenta into the brain of the fetus, where it can linger for years. In extreme amounts, more than 10 micrograms per gram as measured in hair (which scientists use to gauge the body's mercury levels), mercury can cause mental retardation, cerebral palsy, deafness and blindness. In the lower-level amounts typically found in Americans—fewer than 2 micrograms per gram in hair—risks to a newborn include a drop of a few IQ points, slow brain development and learning disabilities. Researchers at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimate that more than 300,000 babies born each year in this country are at risk of having brain damage due to mercury exposure in utero."

"Women may also have to worry for their own health: A 2003 study by San Francisco internist Jane Hightower, M.D., published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, found that 89 percent of her female patients had mercury levels above what most scientists consider safe, and that high mercury levels in adults correlated with memory loss, fatigue and muscle aches. Another preliminary study this year found that mothers who delivered prematurely were more likely to have high mercury levels."

"The Faroes study, which also appeared in 1997 and was led by Philippe Grandjean, M.D., professor of environmental health at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, showed that children born to mothers with elevated mercury levels were slow to develop motor and speech skills. "Over an entire population, it can be significant," Dr. Grandjean says. "You will have fewer kids who are really bright and will have pushed a few [down so far] they can't compete in high school."

"Recent research on men in Finland found that mercury in fish increased their risk for heart disease, potentially counteracting the benefits hearts get from omega-3's. Dr. Grandjean, who led the Faroe Islands study, argues that although low-mercury fish is definitely a health food, the evidence linking mercury to heart disease is now strong enough that no one—man, woman or child—should eat fish with elevated mercury levels."

Where does the mercury in tuna and other fish come from?

"Mercury is a liquid metal found in rocks, including coal. When power plants burn coal, they release mercury, causing nearly half of U.S. man-made mercury pollution, according to the EPA."
"Every day in this country, coal-fired power plants in all 50 states spew out particles laced with mercury."
"... a 2002 study published in Environmental Science & Technology estimated that 70 percent of the mercury in our atmosphere was put there by humans."

And now a quick look at the power industry...

"But has women's health truly come first in the government's handling of the mercury issue? For the past decade, numerous scientists have accused the FDA of ignoring their advice and watering down its rules to suit the wishes of Big Tuna: the fisheries that catch and process tuna and the companies that sell it. "It's been complete and utter foot dragging by the FDA," says Deborah Rice, Ph.D., a former senior toxicologist at the EPA now working for the state of Maine. At the same time, Big Tuna—and the electrical-power industry that generates mercury emissions in the first place—have put money into scientific studies that found low threats from mercury and have used that research to argue against tighter rules. Leonardo Trasande, M.D., an expert on environmental toxins at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, says the result of the country's lax methylmercury regulations will be felt for decades to come: 'Mercury is going to poison an entire generation of our nation's children.'"

"But the most reassuring mercury news that year came from an international team ... working in the Seychelles islands off the east coast of Africa. At the time the women studied gave birth, they had about 6 mcg per gram of mercury in their hair—an alarmingly high level. But at a year and a half, the women's babies showed no ill effects. The work...was funded by the governments of the United States and the Seychelles, not private industry. Big Tuna and the power industry chipped in the following year, giving some of the Seychelles researchers grants of half a million dollars to evaluate methods of testing children for cognitive defects resulting from environmental toxins, including mercury. In addition to money from an FDA program, the project attracted $5,000 from the fisheries institute, $10,000 from the U.S. Tuna Foundation and $486,000 from the Electric Power Research Institute in Palo Alto, California, a research group funded by electric power-plant companies. (Officials with the EPRI did not return calls for comment.)"

"Yet the fact remains, as Dr. Hightower puts it, that in contrast to studies connected to industry, "most independent studies have found that mercury has harmful health effects." A 2007 British study published in Lancet was the exception, suggesting that eating seafood while pregnant has net health benefits for children. But other independent studies in the United States, New Zealand and the Faroe Islands near Iceland have all shown danger to children due to mercury in seafood."
"The power industry helped underwrite a speech by University of Rochester researcher Philip Davidson, Ph.D., (from the Seychelles study) to a July 2003 conference co-hosted by the American Association on Mental Retardation."

"The San Francisco judge who ruled against consumer warnings relied heavily on the testimony of François Morel, Ph.D., professor of geosciences at Princeton University in New Jersey, whose findings indicate that very little of the mercury in tuna comes from man-made sources. The state countered in its appeal that Morel's claims are "not shared by any other scientists in the field." Morel's research had been aided by—surprise—the U.S. Tuna Foundation. He says that since 2003, he has also accepted roughly $150,000 a year in grants from the Electric Power Research Institute. The power industry has funded almost all of the research into the chemistry of mercury, he adds. "I've yet to see any problems. People are honest and EPRI realizes it would damage itself by trying to skew the results."

And mercury doesn't just damage health, but possibly the economy as well

"And then there's tuna. It has become a focus of mercury worries because we eat so much of it: Canned tuna is the most popular fish in the United States and the second most popular seafood after shrimp, generating close to $1.5 billion in sales annually. That means, as Dr. Jane Hightower notes, 'the issue of mercury in fish involves not only the health of the consumer, but the health of the economy.'"

What to do? What to do?

"The message she (Dr. Jane Hightower, who has treated nearly 100 women for mercury poisoning) gives patients: Use common sense. Fish such as salmon, flax-fed hens, grass-fed beef and fortified products are all good sources of healthy fats. "You can get omega 3's without significantly increasing your mercury level and at the same time have a very healthful diet," she says. "Poison is not a good thing to eat."

The tools at OceansAlive.org can help you sort out which fish have high levels of mercury, and which have low levels of mercury.

Write the city council and mayor. Tell them to require JEA to lower mercury emissions and fund the testing of Jacksonville's water for mercury.

Something is rotten in Jacksonville

2007-07-26T15:42:00.000-07:00

Setting: St. Johns River?

City's Response to Effects of Mercury Pollution, "La la la la la la, we can't hear you."

2007-07-20T08:40:00.000-07:00

Not literally, of course. But, since Jacksonville has the highest mercury emissions in the state, one would hope our city would be proactive to find out how that effects us all. According to a recent article in Folioweekly, that doesn't seems to be the case...

From Folioweekly, July 17, 2007:

Poison Control
A local census of mercury pollution shows Jacksonville is in big trouble. So why won't the city's Environmental Protection Board step up to help?

Environment Owen Holmes oholmesATfolioweekly.com

(image) The Public Trust's Quilla Miralia, who was instrumental in assembling the group's report on mercury.

Unknown Quantities
How bad is mercury pollution in Jacksonville? The city's Environmental Protection Board doesn't want to know

Concerned about the severe physical and neurological impacts of mercury exposure, Jacksonville's Public Trust Environmental Law Institute brought a representative from the national Mercury Deposition Network to address the city of Jacksonville's Environmental Protection Board at its Jan. 8 meeting. MDN assistant coordinator David Gay laid out the need for Jacksonville to thoroughly assess its mercury levels. The board responded by asking The Public Trust to find out what is currently known about local mercury, and report back.

The group did so last week. Six months in the marking, the exhaustive review of the existing body of knowledge on mercury concludes that information about levels in Northeast Florida's air and water is spotty at best, often conflicting and derived largely from industry self-reporting. Despite the absence of reliable data, the report states, it's likely that Northeast Florida is a "mercury hotspot" due to the presence of major coal-fired power plants (including two adjacent to the Timucuan Preserve) and the region's coastal geography and intricate waterway system. The prevalence of fish in local diets makes residents further predisposed to mercury exposure, which has been linked to brain damage and autism.

To ensure that mercury will be thoroughly, independently monitored -- and that policies might be subsequently adjusted -- The Public Trust again proposed that the EPB fund testing by the nationally recognized Mercury Deposition Network. The $120,000 cost would include sampling every rainfall for a year, with a focus on the area around JEA's Northside Generating Station and St. Johns River Power Park -- the two biggest sources or mercury emissions in the city. (According to JEA's own 2003 estimates, the two facilities are the source of 20 percent of Florida's total mercury emissions, but JEA has since said their estimates were skewed.) The study would also trace various mercury compounds back to their source industries.

But after The Public Trust president and former Environmental Protection Board member Warren Anderson presented his group's findings, the EPB was non-committal at best. Some members suggested asking local college students to perform the testing, or asking JEA to fund the study. Chair Michael Templeton said the issue, like global warming, seems "bigger than life." No conclusion was reach; after a few minutes of discussion, the meeting moved on to a Sunshine Law refresher course.

Asked about the board's position on the study, EPB program administrator Christi Veleta says the board simply doesn't know whether it will fund the program. "We haven't even gone there, to be honest with you. The discussion at the meeting is as far as it's gone," she says, adding that it's possible the issue will arise at upcoming committee meetings. Asked if the board feels that testing mercury levels is a priority, Veleta responds, "We sure need to find out all the information we can find out. No one doubts that."

Weighing the dangers of mercury exposure against feel-good EPB programs like the annual kids' EnviroCamp makes the difficulty of securing money for mercury testing more frustrating. However, funding for the program wouldn't come from the EPB's annual budget, says Veleta. Instead, if the board decides to approve funding for the study, the money would be taken from the city's Environmental Protection Trust Fund, a depository for funds the city gains from settlements with local environmental violators. According to city spokesperson Kristen Key, the fund currently has a balance of more than $1.3 million. Anderson says given the EPB's inaction, he'll now ask JEA to fund the study. If the utility refuses, he'll work on persuading EPB members individually -- "Are you going to do this voluntarily or are we going to have to shame you into it?" he says.

The MDN program has the endorsement of Thomas Atkeson, mercury coordinator for the state Department of Environmental Protection's Division of Resource Assessment and Management. "Long-term, consistent monitoring is essential to understanding the trends of mercury impacting our waterbodies and watersheds, which will certainly she light of the path of mercury in Florida and the nation," he wrote in a July 3 letter to The Public Trust, noting that his department was a charter member of the MDN. "I look forward with great anticipation of having another mercury deposition monitoring site in Florida."
Given the level of the EPB's interest in funding the study to date, Atkeson shouldn't hold his breath. In the meantime, The Public Trust's report on existing mercury data can be viewed online at publictrustlaw.org.

If you think the Environmental Protection Board should fund mercury testing, please click here to write the mayor and city council.

You gave these people your vote, now give them a piece of your mind UPDATED

2007-07-19T09:00:00.000-07:00

...and protect your mind. Tell them to require JEA to lower mercury emissions every time it raises rates. Also tell them you want the Environmental Protection Board to test local mercury levels. Here is the updated list for the recently elected City Council. Simply copy and paste addresses of those you want to email into your email program and tell them what you think. Or, an even easier option is below!
Mayor
John Peyton - jpeyton@coj.net
City Council
At Large Group 1
Ronnie Fussell - RonnieF@coj.net
At- Large Group 2
Jay Jabour - Jabour@coj.net
At-Large Group 3
Stephen Joost - Joost@coj.net
At-Large Group 4
Kevin Hyde - KHyde@coj.net
At-Large Group 5
Glorious J. Johnson - GloriousJ@coj.net
District 1
Clay Yarborough - Clay@coj.net
District 2
Bill Bishop - WBishop@coj.net
District 3
Richard Clark - RClark@coj.net
District 4
Don Redman - Redman@coj.net
District 5
Art Shad - AShad@coj.net
District 6
Jack Webb - Webb@coj.net
District 7
Dr. Johnny A. Gaffney - Gaffney@coj.net
District 8
E. Denise Lee - EDLee@coj.net
District 9
Warren Anthony Jones - WAJones@coj.net
District 10
Mia Jones - MJones@coj.net
District 11
Ray Holt - Holt@coj.net
District 12
Daniel Davis - DDavis@coj.net
District 13
Arthur Graham - ArtG@coj.net
District 14
Michael Corrigan - Corrigan@coj.net

If you don't have time to craft your own email to candidates, here is a suggested note you can just copy and paste into your email. Of course, feel free to revise as you see best. Also, below the note you will find a list of all candidates' email addresses divided by commas. Simply copy and paste the entire list into the "To:" field of your email program.

Dear Candidate,
I am writing you to ask you to support the Mercury Falling initiative, which calls for JEA to lower mercury emissions by the same amount it raises rates. Duval County has the abysmal honor of ranking first in the state for emissions of mercury with 21% of Florida's total, according to a 2002 EPA Toxic Release Inventory (TRI). And this in a state ranked 11th in the country for mercury emissions (according to the Florida Public Interest Research Group.) Even worse, the report found that virtually all of our county's emissions were from JEA's St. Johns River Power Park and Northside Generating Station.

Mercury is considered harmful to all parts of the brain, especially young brains, and is known to cause attention deficits, memory and language impairment, autism, and low IQ. Exposure to high levels of mercury may cause loss of motor function and irreversible nerve and kidney damage. Mercury emissions may harm Jacksonville's economy in other ways as well. For example, Jacksonville is well known for the annual Kingfish Tournament, but state health officials recommend people never eat large kingfish because they contain so much mercury.

JEA is a public utility and its board of directors is appointed by the mayor and approved by the city council. That is why it is in your control to do something about this problem and pledge your support to the Mercury Falling initiative.

Thank you,

And here is a list of current council members' emails you can post in the "To:" field of your email program...
jpeyton@coj.net, RonnieF@coj.net, Jabour@coj.net, Joost@coj.net, KHyde@coj.net, GloriousJ@coj.net, Clay@coj.net, WBishop@coj.net, RClark@coj.net, Redman@coj.net, AShad@coj.net, Webb@coj.net, Gaffney@coj.net, EDLee@coj.net, WAJones@coj.net, MJones@coj.net, Holt@coj.net, DDavis@coj.net, ArtG@coj.net, Corrigan@coj.net

Heavy Metal: Bad enough on the radio, even worse in Jacksonville's food supply

2007-07-02T18:52:00.000-07:00

The next time you take a bite out of a juicy orange you picked off a tree in your backyard or a blueberry from a local farmer's market, you might want to stop and think what you're really eating. Jacksonville's coal-fired power plants emit A LOT of mercury. Is that mercury making its way into our local food supply?

For a hint whether this dangerous neurotoxin can get into our food supply, we can take a look at China. A recent Wall Street Journal article ("China Faces a New Worry: Heavy Metals in the Food," 7/2/07) delved into the effects of pollution in that country. Among its findings..."China’s soil contamination is caused by a range of factors. Mercury released into the air by coal-fired power plants is captured by raindrops, and transferred to the soil and groundwater."

Is JEA's pollution making its way into our food? And, if so, what is the true cost of your electric bill? Just some questions to nosh on.

Hey, Thanks Owen

2007-06-27T13:39:00.000-07:00

To read the full Folioweekly article referenced below, "Other People's Property," please click here. And a very special thanks to Owen Holmes (no relation to Owen Wilson) for providing the article, and, heck, for writing it in the first place. This topic isn't getting reported on much, if at all, in the local media.

JEA Gives Taylor County an iPod, While We're Still Listening to an Eight-Track

2007-06-23T13:36:00.000-07:00

The title is clearly an analogy. But city-owned JEA is building a cleaner plant with better technology in Taylor County than the plant they operate right here in Jacksonville. That's right, according to Mark McCain, spokesperson for the JEA-developed project, "The plant...will emit a third of the sulfur dioxide and half of the nitrogen dioxide of JEA's Northside Generating Station." He goes on to say, "This is not your grandfather's coal plant." (source: Other People's Property: JEA wants to pollute one of Florida's dirtiest counties, Folio Weekly, 06/19/07)

Why are we stuck with "your grandfather's coal plant"? Why do we get twice the nitrogen dioxide pollution (which has been linked to Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) and three times the sulfur dioxide (which causes acid rain) of JEA's plant in Taylor County. We own JEA, it is city-owned! If anything, JEA should clean up our plant in our city first. We should have the best, cleanest technology. We own JEA!

But there's really another issue here. Why is JEA building another dirty, coal-fired plant at all? They are really just exporting our pollution to Taylor County. "There's a lot of sick people in Taylor County," Joy Towles Ezell, a fifth-generation Taylor County resident said, "We don't need another mercury source."

Building a dirty plant in Taylor County that provides no electricity to its residents is a raw deal. We should know, Florida Power & Light does it to us by operating a coal-fired plant in Jacksonville that provides no local electricity. Let's not do it to our own neighbors. But at the same time, let's clean up our own act. If cleaner technology is good for JEA's plant in Taylor County, its good for JEA's plant in Jacksonville.

Taylor County doesn't want our mercury emissions either

2007-06-21T07:34:00.000-07:00

Hello JEA Board Members,
I have learned that you have a rate increase hearing going on right now - and I'd like to complain.
I am writing to you from Taylor County, FL - where JEA has decided to export its pollution and stomp its carbon footprint on us. It is quite obvious that JEA needs a rate increase to cover the increased and unexpected costs of the Taylor Emphysema Center, without having to reveal such to your customers.
Since your customers don't know about your involvement with this Edsel-era pulverized coal burner, (nothing's been in the newspaper in JAX about it - so far) - guess I'll just have to let them know myself. I sure hope this message goes into the public record of your meeting.
There are more problems arising that JEA's pr folks didn't expect (that Buckeye buddies didn't tell you) - problems like railroad access, lack of water, problems with permits, getting yourselves involved with Buckeye's toxic effluent (you'll own it when you pipe it- are you sure you want YOU want to own that nasty dioxin-laden stink?), increased attorneys fees, problems over at the PSC, the governor's office, outlying counties not accepting JEA's toxic wastes, outlying counties not wanting the air pollution - or the mercury, and a lack of support by nearly everyone in Taylor county except for that of five politicians and their little pseudo friends clique. That's all you've got. If a vote were taken in Taylor County on whether or not to have a coal fired power plant here, you'd lose, and you know it, and our county commissioners know it. We will remove three of them from office in 2008.
Wouldn't it be smarter of JEA to stop this ridiculous proposal right now? You are going to lose, and we will make sure that your loss will be very shameful for you. I attempted to tell your first pr guy, Ron Whittington, that he was barking up the wrong tree. He should have listened. Are you listening to the world-wide movement and opinions concerning climate change? Aren't you concerned about global warming? Are you sure that you want to be associated with causing the problem, do you want to be blamed for adding to the problem, instead of working to solve the problem? Come on, get on the right track.
Wouldn't it be smarter of JEA to increase its solar program? JEA is so proud of the current solar program - forced upon JEA , not by the utilities' goodness of heart, but by an environmental lawsuit.
How about some ocean current just off JAX Beach? How about some wind energy - you have plenty of wind and open space over there in Duval County - it's a big county, and JAX covers the whole county. How about some good conservation measures?
We know that JAX is in danger of losing your federal highway funds?. Yes, we know you are at the level of attainment (caused by your coal fired power plant), and are in danger of JAX losing its federal highway funds if you built another coal fired power plant in Duval County - so you'd rather little ol' poor Taylor County lost its federal highway funds. Well, that is beginning to dawn upon our poor little county fathers over here......and they might be just a little bit upset at that thought. It all comes down to money You may have more money, but more people in Florida are on our side. Go away, JEA.
Just thought I'd let you know.
I don't expect a response, though one would be nice.

thanks,
Joy Towles Ezell

See the light

2007-06-08T09:04:00.000-07:00

You know the story: Change your incandescent bulbs to compact fluorescent lightbulbs (CFLs) and it's a win-win situation: you save money on your electric bill and JEA doesn't need to burn as much mercury-emitting coal. But, as some people have noted, CFLs themselves contain some mercury. So, are they still a smart choice? Outside magazine says:

"CFLs contain only five milligrams of mercury, less than what's released from a coal-fired plant producing the energy used by an incandescent bulb during one year."

And, everyone knows, JEA burns A LOT of coal to power Jacksonville. So the answer is, switch to CFLs, save money, and hopefully cut down on the massive amounts of mercury that JEA emits. And when it comes time to throwing out a CFL (which shouldn't be anytime soon since they last 10 times longer than traditional bulbs), Outside magazine notes:

"Still, don't go throwing CFLs in your household trash. Check earth911.org for safe, local disposal options."