<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8CQ38-eyp7ImA9WhBaEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662</id><updated>2013-05-21T17:34:22.153-07:00</updated><category term="Phillips Curve" /><category term="Quad D" /><category term="Interactives" /><category term="Daily Review" /><category term="Income" /><category term="Reffonomics" /><category term="Asymmetrical Information" /><category term="free market capitalism" /><category term="Wages" /><category term="barriers to entry" /><category term="Marginal Thinking" /><category term="Successful Practices Network" /><category term="Externalities" /><category term="automatic stabilizers" /><category term="Gas" /><category term="Derived Demand" /><category term="Women" /><category term="moral hazard" /><category term="game theory" /><category term="Logistics" /><category term="exchange rates" /><category term="unemployment insurance" /><category term="stock market" /><category term="Interest Rates" /><category term="PPF" /><category term="crowding out; fiscal policy" /><category term="taxes" /><category term="labor market" /><category term="sequester" /><category term="LeBron" /><category term="EconEdLink" /><category term="National debt" /><category term="AP Macroeconomics" /><category term="elasticity" /><category term="Pareto" /><category term="Krugman-Wells" /><category term="political economy" /><category term="Jokes" /><category term="labor force participation rate" /><category term="Clinton" /><category term="fallacy of composition" /><category term="Pep UP" /><category term="comparative advantage" /><category term="real exchange rate" /><category term="humor" /><category term="Unemployment" /><category term="indicators" /><category term="Long Run Supply" /><category term="unanticipated inflation" /><category term="real money demand" /><category term="Current Account" /><category term="Natural Rate of Unemployment" /><category term="Lorenz Curve" /><category term="opportunity cost" /><category term="cartoon" /><category term="Unemployment rate" /><category term="Rigor-Relevance" /><category term="Minimum Wage" /><category term="game" /><category term="Income Inelastic" /><category term="Monopooly" /><category term="Spillover" /><category term="Monopoly" /><category term="circular flow" /><category term="US Dollar" /><category term="housing" /><category term="Market Failure" /><category term="GPF Equalization" /><category term="Luxury Good" /><category term="market" /><category term="Supply and Demand" /><category term="Livescribe" /><category term="durable goods" /><category term="AP Microeconomics" /><category term="complements" /><category term="Labor" /><category term="caricatures" /><category term="Keynesian" /><category term="Education" /><category term="Equality" /><category term="FRED" /><category term="progressive income taxes" /><category term="Keynesian cross" /><category term="Globalization" /><category term="Slideshare" /><category term="Juan" /><category term="technology" /><category term="specialization" /><category term="Supply Chain" /><category term="perfect competition" /><category term="aggregate demand" /><category term="HNI" /><category term="gains from trade" /><category term="Regional Economist" /><category term="Rawls" /><category term="GDP" /><category term="Philosophy" /><category term="Logic" /><category term="Kindle Fire" /><category term="Warm up" /><category term="Effective Schools" /><category term="command" /><category term="Fisher" /><category term="Behavior Economics" /><category term="Politics" /><category term="inflation tax" /><category term="Laffer Curve" /><category term="public savings" /><category term="tied-in price" /><category term="Structural Unemployment" /><category term="Normal Goods" /><category term="Obama" /><category term="Job Creation" /><category term="CPI" /><category term="Constant Cost" /><category term="private savings" /><category term="public debt" /><category term="Law" /><category term="adverse selection" /><category term="balance of payments" /><category term="fiscal policy" /><category term="PPC" /><category term="BLS" /><category term="real interest rate" /><category term="Network" /><category term="Price Theory" /><category term="microeconomics" /><category term="Credit Markets" /><category term="Two-Minute Drills" /><category term="CBO" /><category term="law of demand" /><category term="business cycle" /><category term="Power to the Poor" /><category term="Discounting the Future" /><category term="Gapminder" /><category term="per-unit tax" /><category term="Signaling" /><category term="Classical Economics" /><category term="Label Search" /><category term="TI-83 Projects" /><category term="Cartoons" /><category term="Basic Concepts" /><category term="supply" /><category term="Aggregate Supply" /><category term="Inflation" /><category term="Graphing" /><category term="Utility" /><category term="Institutional Change" /><category term="Trade Deficit" /><category term="Production Function" /><category term="economics" /><category term="MR=MC" /><category term="Tragedy of the Commons" /><category term="Data" /><category term="Okun's Law" /><category term="consumer equilibrium" /><category term="nominal interest rate" /><category term="monetary policy" /><category term="coloring book" /><category term="real money balances" /><category term="scarity" /><category term="loanable funds" /><category term="demand" /><category term="Inferior Goods" /><category term="economists" /><category term="Mysteries" /><category term="mixed" /><category term="Terms of Trade" /><title>Mikeroeconomics</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2006</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Mikeroeconomics" /><feedburner:info uri="mikeroeconomics" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAFQX4yeSp7ImA9WhBaEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-2773264247714411063</id><published>2013-05-21T10:51:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-21T10:51:50.091-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-21T10:51:50.091-07:00</app:edited><title>Teen's Cellphone Invention</title><content type="html">This from &lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/teen-invention-could-charge-cellphones-20-seconds-143535710.html?vp=1"&gt;Yahoo!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="tr_bq"&gt;
&lt;div class="first"&gt;
A California teen’s invention could potentially knock down cellphone-charging time to a superfast 20 seconds.&lt;/div&gt;
So far, the energy-storage device has powered only an LED light, but it has the potential to do much more.&lt;br /&gt;

The future certainly looks bright for 18-year-old Eesha Khare, who 
pocketed a $50,000 prize for the Young Scientist award from the Intel 
International Science and Engineering Fair in Phoenix, Ariz., for her 
tiny and possibly revolutionary device.&lt;br /&gt;

Khare sees the device as potentially powering car batteries, 
cellphones or any electronics that could use a rechargeable battery.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I have several thoughts, some of them not so smart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.&amp;nbsp; Batteries charge fast now.&amp;nbsp; Why would she need batteries to charge faster when she could concentrate her efforts on curing a social ill?&lt;br /&gt;
2.&amp;nbsp; the $50,000 cash was a huge incentive and added credibility to her resume.&lt;br /&gt;
3.&amp;nbsp; I think this shows how the economy naturally works toward efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;
4.&amp;nbsp; There should be a shift in Marginal Social Benefit curve to the right.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;
5.&amp;nbsp; In emergency situations such as a tornado, people displaced by the storm will have greater ability to reach loved ones faster.&lt;br /&gt;
6.&amp;nbsp; Is this invention like the car that go farther on a gallon of gasoline?&amp;nbsp; In other words, will people demand more devices that use batteries thus increasing the need for faster battery chargers?&lt;br /&gt;
7.&amp;nbsp; This invention shows what I've said all along.&amp;nbsp; Each generation is smarter than the one before it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/2AEyBHSKMUQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2773264247714411063/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/teens-cellphone-invention.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2773264247714411063?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2773264247714411063?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/2AEyBHSKMUQ/teens-cellphone-invention.html" title="Teen's Cellphone Invention" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/teens-cellphone-invention.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkEGRX84cCp7ImA9WhBbGUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-2764509003767598146</id><published>2013-05-19T03:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-19T03:17:04.138-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-19T03:17:04.138-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Marginal Thinking" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="perfect competition" /><title>Calvin and Hobbs on Free Market Economics</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xG1dmZAPLUk/UZil90DvsaI/AAAAAAAAEMI/uWSP3N3xuKM/s1600/economics+basics.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="280" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xG1dmZAPLUk/UZil90DvsaI/AAAAAAAAEMI/uWSP3N3xuKM/s400/economics+basics.jpg" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Isn't this the infant industry argument? &amp;nbsp;Competition fosters innovation and a "race to the bottom" in which prices equate at their marginal cost and profits are zero. &amp;nbsp;In a market where there's easy entrance such as this, one would expect no profits to be made in the long run. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/ZL2fgQUcfsI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2764509003767598146/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/calvin-and-hobbs-on-free-market.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2764509003767598146?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2764509003767598146?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/ZL2fgQUcfsI/calvin-and-hobbs-on-free-market.html" title="Calvin and Hobbs on Free Market Economics" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xG1dmZAPLUk/UZil90DvsaI/AAAAAAAAEMI/uWSP3N3xuKM/s72-c/economics+basics.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/calvin-and-hobbs-on-free-market.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUAGQ3w-cSp7ImA9WhBbGEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-776798164916432804</id><published>2013-05-18T09:15:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-18T09:15:22.259-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-18T09:15:22.259-07:00</app:edited><title>Let Them Eat Cake</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AxERQZTC-YA/UZenf342EaI/AAAAAAAAEL4/OdhqPksvI9c/s1600/78.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="258" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AxERQZTC-YA/UZenf342EaI/AAAAAAAAEL4/OdhqPksvI9c/s400/78.jpg" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Income allows those advantages that those lacking income can't take advantage. &amp;nbsp;In this cartoon, investors with disposable income can invest and make returns that those who need every dime to live cannot. &amp;nbsp;Income builds income and disparity widens. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Economics involves choices. &amp;nbsp;For those who are unemployed, what choices were made that put them on the dole. &amp;nbsp;For example, did they work on weekends to build skills or did they spend $400 going to a baseball game? &amp;nbsp;At work did they find a way to make them more valuable to the company or did they find a way of doing as little as possible? &amp;nbsp;There are many valuable, hard working men and women who are unemployed and I'm not one to make hasty generalizations. &amp;nbsp;My comments simply include how income leads to disparity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/YMpYK1WdsRw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/776798164916432804/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/let-them-eat-cake.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/776798164916432804?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/776798164916432804?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/YMpYK1WdsRw/let-them-eat-cake.html" title="Let Them Eat Cake" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-AxERQZTC-YA/UZenf342EaI/AAAAAAAAEL4/OdhqPksvI9c/s72-c/78.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/let-them-eat-cake.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkQDQn8_eyp7ImA9WhBbFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-2193373528866697953</id><published>2013-05-14T02:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-14T02:39:33.143-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-14T02:39:33.143-07:00</app:edited><title>Some Brands That Produce in Bangladesh</title><content type="html">The &amp;nbsp;Yahoo! Finance article is&lt;a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/biggest-brands-clothes-bangladesh-203845410.html"&gt; here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="tr_bq"&gt;
&lt;div class="source" style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; margin-top: 11px; padding: 0px;"&gt;
REUTERS/Andrew Biraj&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;span style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;"&gt;As the death toll in the Bangladesh factory collapse&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/05/09/bangladesh-factory-collapse-death-toll/2149189/" style="background-color: white; color: #005790; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;climbs past 1,000&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;, major retailers that do business in the country are facing calls for accountability.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; margin-top: 11px; padding: 0px;"&gt;
Deadly factory accidents&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/bangladesh-factory-disasters-are-increasing-2013-4" style="color: #005790; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;are relatively common&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;in Bangladesh, where government safety standards are rarely enforced.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; margin-top: 11px; padding: 0px;"&gt;
Foreign companies met earlier this month&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-30/bangladesh-court-orders-building-owners-s-assets-be-held.html" style="color: #005790; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;&amp;nbsp;to discuss improving worker safety&lt;/a&gt;, despite having&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/100679902" style="color: #005790; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;refused to fund safety improvements for factories&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;just months ago.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; margin-top: 11px; padding: 0px;"&gt;
Bangladesh has said it will discuss&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/bangladesh-raising-minimum-wage-2013-5" style="color: #005790; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;raising the minimum wage from $38-a-month&lt;/a&gt;, currently the world's lowest.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: Georgia, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 22.453125px; margin-top: 11px; padding: 0px;"&gt;
The garment industry in Bangladesh accounts for about $20 billion in exports.&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.laborrights.org/sites/default/files/publications-and-resources/DeadlySecrets.pdf" style="color: #005790; text-decoration: none;" target="_blank"&gt;Of those exports&lt;/a&gt;, about 59 percent go to the European Union, 26 percent go to the U.S. and 5 percent go to Canada.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I don't know much about the country off the coast of India, but I will bet that $38 a month is higher than any other wage that the workers could find and be legally employed. &amp;nbsp;Life has never been easy for most of the residents of this country. &amp;nbsp;In the 1970s I remember George Harrison's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Concert_for_Bangladesh"&gt;Concert for Bangladesh&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;By the way, I once offered a programmer from this country $500 to write an app for me that would take about a week. &amp;nbsp;This is about 12 times more than the weekly salary in a factory. &amp;nbsp;I am pro labor and I have been a MEA member for 33 years. &amp;nbsp;I would support legislation that raised the&amp;nbsp;minimum&amp;nbsp;wage rate in this country although I know it will cost jobs. &amp;nbsp;I want better working conditions that are safe. &amp;nbsp;But social forces being what they are, if it becomes more expensive to produce in this country, producers will move someplace else. &amp;nbsp;Many more will be hurt then. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My deepest sympathies are extended to the workers in this country. &amp;nbsp;I hope for relief for those whose family was injured. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/_vZjor20t30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2193373528866697953/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/some-brands-that-produce-in-bangladesh.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2193373528866697953?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2193373528866697953?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/_vZjor20t30/some-brands-that-produce-in-bangladesh.html" title="Some Brands That Produce in Bangladesh" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/some-brands-that-produce-in-bangladesh.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkMNQHk6eip7ImA9WhBbE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-24511758833420104</id><published>2013-05-12T04:34:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-12T04:34:51.712-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-12T04:34:51.712-07:00</app:edited><title>Sir Ken Robinson on Education</title><content type="html">&lt;iframe src="http://embed.ted.com/playlists/124/ken_robinson_10_talks_on_educ.html" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;

There's been a lot of talk about flipping the classroom in education.  This means that the students do the reading of the content for the next day, then come to class and do the "homework".  This sounds good and I'm sure it works with some of the students, but I don't believe it would work on a large scale.  

One reason is that students discount the future so heavily that I don't believe that students will choose to read a textbook instead of going to work or an extracurricular activity.  I think students would choose to enjoy the immediate benefits when the costs come later.  I believe that Gary Becker believes that students will discount the future up to 50% which is pretty steep.  This is one reason why I don't believe flipping the classroom will work. 

Public education is always being attached for various reasons such as failing to prepare students for the real world.  I hate this statement because it shifts all of the burden from the learner to the teacher.  When I go the the library, all I see is people using a computer to play a game of post on social media.  I seldom see anyone engaged in serious study.  Flipping the classroom will not work and neither will individualizing instruction.  What has to change is the learner.  

Like the Japanese saying goes, "When the student is ready, the teacher will appear."

&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/OztAr1Ymqls" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/24511758833420104/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/sir-ken-robinson-on-education.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/24511758833420104?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/24511758833420104?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/OztAr1Ymqls/sir-ken-robinson-on-education.html" title="Sir Ken Robinson on Education" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/sir-ken-robinson-on-education.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08HR3o9cCp7ImA9WhBbEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-6499778689778112628</id><published>2013-05-09T07:30:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-09T07:30:36.468-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-09T07:30:36.468-07:00</app:edited><title>Television Ad</title><content type="html">&lt;object id="flashObj" width="640" height="390" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isSlim=1" /&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /&gt;&lt;param name="flashVars" value="videoId=2363603357001&amp;playerID=2207682275001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAABvaL8JE~,ufBHq_I6Fnwgpz2JFHz_Jerf-MHxK_Ad&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /&gt;&lt;param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /&gt;&lt;param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;&lt;param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /&gt;&lt;embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isSlim=1" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=2363603357001&amp;playerID=2207682275001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAABvaL8JE~,ufBHq_I6Fnwgpz2JFHz_Jerf-MHxK_Ad&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="640" height="390" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;

&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/BxikbutTl9M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6499778689778112628/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/television-ad.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6499778689778112628?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6499778689778112628?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/BxikbutTl9M/television-ad.html" title="Television Ad" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/television-ad.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUHQnw-fyp7ImA9WhBUGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-3436401624347222383</id><published>2013-05-06T06:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-06T06:17:13.257-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-06T06:17:13.257-07:00</app:edited><title>Excellence in Education</title><content type="html">Click &lt;a href="http://muscatinejournal.com/news/local/education/excellence-in-education-honors-area-students/article_a54c238f-1f22-5479-9525-a2cf97369cf4.html"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for the Muscatine Journal article.  Three of the winners are mock trial participants.  &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/TJylqhGhMME" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/3436401624347222383/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/excellence-in-education.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/3436401624347222383?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/3436401624347222383?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/TJylqhGhMME/excellence-in-education.html" title="Excellence in Education" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/excellence-in-education.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUcESX4_eSp7ImA9WhBUGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-5183824984251600584</id><published>2013-05-06T02:36:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-06T02:36:48.041-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-06T02:36:48.041-07:00</app:edited><title>HaywardEcon Blog---"I am not an Economist. I just play one in a public high school": How much does Prom cost and who pays? A nice graph...</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://haywardeconblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/how-much-does-prom-cost-and-who-pays.html?spref=bl"&gt;HaywardEcon Blog---"I am not an Economist. I just play one in a public high school": How much does Prom cost and who pays? A nice graph...&lt;/a&gt;: &amp;nbsp;   &amp;nbsp;   Here is a short summation of the findings from a VISA survey where this graphic came from (found HERE).   &amp;nbsp;   Spending on the a...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/13eVc23RazE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://haywardeconblog.blogspot.com/2013/05/how-much-does-prom-cost-and-who-pays.html?spref=bl" title="HaywardEcon Blog---&quot;I am not an Economist. I just play one in a public high school&quot;: How much does Prom cost and who pays? A nice graph..." /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/5183824984251600584/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/haywardecon-blog-i-am-not-economist-i.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5183824984251600584?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5183824984251600584?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/13eVc23RazE/haywardecon-blog-i-am-not-economist-i.html" title="HaywardEcon Blog---&quot;I am not an Economist. I just play one in a public high school&quot;: How much does Prom cost and who pays? A nice graph..." /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/haywardecon-blog-i-am-not-economist-i.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMFQXc9fyp7ImA9WhBUFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-2923729833219477615</id><published>2013-05-03T02:46:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-03T02:46:50.967-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-03T02:46:50.967-07:00</app:edited><title>Kal Cartoon</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lBbsssCf3jA/UYOG9idegUI/AAAAAAAAEJY/BldN7dnczQ4/s1600/kal.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="265" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lBbsssCf3jA/UYOG9idegUI/AAAAAAAAEJY/BldN7dnczQ4/s400/kal.png" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
The question violates a Federal Rule of Evidence. &amp;nbsp;That is a question cannot ask for speculation and demands an answer for which the "eye witness" lack s personal knowledge. &amp;nbsp;The question should not be allowed. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/D6ZA59yNmfU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2923729833219477615/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/kal-cartoon.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2923729833219477615?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2923729833219477615?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/D6ZA59yNmfU/kal-cartoon.html" title="Kal Cartoon" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lBbsssCf3jA/UYOG9idegUI/AAAAAAAAEJY/BldN7dnczQ4/s72-c/kal.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/kal-cartoon.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUNRHk8cSp7ImA9WhBUFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-738886258309135976</id><published>2013-05-02T02:51:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2013-05-02T02:51:35.779-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-05-02T02:51:35.779-07:00</app:edited><title>Youth Unemployment</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-d4eB4VhrU_I/UYI24HkGbsI/AAAAAAAAEJI/6gwNiOHwqlY/s1600/econ.png" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="568" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-d4eB4VhrU_I/UYI24HkGbsI/AAAAAAAAEJI/6gwNiOHwqlY/s640/econ.png" width="640" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href="http://econ.st/ZVI9MG"&gt;Click here&lt;/a&gt; to see the article.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/j43Q8OxRkIQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/738886258309135976/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/youth-unemployment.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/738886258309135976?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/738886258309135976?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/j43Q8OxRkIQ/youth-unemployment.html" title="Youth Unemployment" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-d4eB4VhrU_I/UYI24HkGbsI/AAAAAAAAEJI/6gwNiOHwqlY/s72-c/econ.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/05/youth-unemployment.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0UHQn0ycSp7ImA9WhBUE0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-9075874416982565644</id><published>2013-04-30T02:47:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-30T02:47:13.399-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-30T02:47:13.399-07:00</app:edited><title>Unemployment Comic</title><content type="html">HT to Jodi Beggs, of Economists Do It With Models

a href="http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&amp;id=2950"&gt;
&lt;img src="http://www.smbc-comics.com/comics/20130418.gif"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/82j-h6q1TEc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/9075874416982565644/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/unemployment-comic.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/9075874416982565644?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/9075874416982565644?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/82j-h6q1TEc/unemployment-comic.html" title="Unemployment Comic" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/unemployment-comic.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUGQH0_cCp7ImA9WhBUEUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-7191218749933902439</id><published>2013-04-28T16:37:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-28T16:37:01.348-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-28T16:37:01.348-07:00</app:edited><title>M1</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5nInAzI-CDM/UX2yDz6FBWI/AAAAAAAAEIc/1a2cWYZOg2c/s1600/m1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="255" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5nInAzI-CDM/UX2yDz6FBWI/AAAAAAAAEIc/1a2cWYZOg2c/s320/m1.png" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
This is my Alzheimer's problem of the day. &amp;nbsp;If the central bank increases the money supply, the MS curve will move to the right and interest rates will fall. &amp;nbsp;Initially, supply will exceed demand so investors will buy bonds driving up their price. &amp;nbsp;As the price of bonds increase, the interest rate falls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/m01bOVRbTmw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/7191218749933902439/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/m1.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7191218749933902439?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7191218749933902439?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/m01bOVRbTmw/m1.html" title="M1" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5nInAzI-CDM/UX2yDz6FBWI/AAAAAAAAEIc/1a2cWYZOg2c/s72-c/m1.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/m1.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIEQH88eCp7ImA9WhBVGEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-5142325621995903778</id><published>2013-04-25T02:51:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-25T02:51:41.170-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-25T02:51:41.170-07:00</app:edited><title>Leading Question</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6M3buRbLCXo/UXj76EwJ44I/AAAAAAAAEIM/ogqY84ffLR0/s1600/leading.png" imageanchor="1"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6M3buRbLCXo/UXj76EwJ44I/AAAAAAAAEIM/ogqY84ffLR0/s320/leading.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I had this idea but featuring Playboy cartoonist, Dean Yeagle's Mandy. &amp;nbsp;I wanted to see how many others had the same idea. &amp;nbsp;Many artists had had the same idea and done it better than me which "leads" me to beg the question. &amp;nbsp;When a firm chooses a price, is there a price that just seems right and I choose it? &amp;nbsp;Or do I blatantly copy the market price like I copied this picture? &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/VfFALvJg_qk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/5142325621995903778/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/leading-question.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5142325621995903778?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5142325621995903778?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/VfFALvJg_qk/leading-question.html" title="Leading Question" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-6M3buRbLCXo/UXj76EwJ44I/AAAAAAAAEIM/ogqY84ffLR0/s72-c/leading.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/leading-question.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8HRHc9eSp7ImA9WhBVFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-3796571327469669484</id><published>2013-04-21T11:27:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-21T11:27:15.961-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-21T11:27:15.961-07:00</app:edited><title>Buying and Selling Bonds</title><content type="html">&lt;iframe src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/19416468" width="427" height="356" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #CCC;border-width:1px 1px 0;margin-bottom:5px" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen&gt; &lt;/iframe&gt; &lt;div style="margin-bottom:5px"&gt; &lt;strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mfladlien/buying-and-selling-bonds" title="Buying and selling bonds" target="_blank"&gt;Buying and selling bonds&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; from &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mfladlien" target="_blank"&gt;Mike Fladlien&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/XcYC5MPPwgg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/3796571327469669484/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/buying-and-selling-bonds.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/3796571327469669484?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/3796571327469669484?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/XcYC5MPPwgg/buying-and-selling-bonds.html" title="Buying and Selling Bonds" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/buying-and-selling-bonds.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YCRHozeip7ImA9WhBVFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-324806020655344042</id><published>2013-04-21T04:52:00.004-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-21T04:52:45.482-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-21T04:52:45.482-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real exchange rate" /><title>Real Exchange Rates</title><content type="html">&lt;iframe src="http://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/embed_code/19359598" width="427" height="356" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" style="border:1px solid #CCC;border-width:1px 1px 0;margin-bottom:5px" allowfullscreen webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen&gt; &lt;/iframe&gt; &lt;div style="margin-bottom:5px"&gt; &lt;strong&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mfladlien/real-exchange-rate" title="Real exchange rate" target="_blank"&gt;Real exchange rate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/strong&gt; from &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.slideshare.net/mfladlien" target="_blank"&gt;Mike Fladlien&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/div&gt;

&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/anzrqVQezVs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/324806020655344042/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/real-exchange-rates.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/324806020655344042?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/324806020655344042?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/anzrqVQezVs/real-exchange-rates.html" title="Real Exchange Rates" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/real-exchange-rates.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0AHQ3czcCp7ImA9WhBVFUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-7065942126168172374</id><published>2013-04-21T03:55:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-21T03:55:32.988-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-21T03:55:32.988-07:00</app:edited><title>Assorted Links</title><content type="html">1. &amp;nbsp;Excel &lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-22213219"&gt;spreadsheet errors&lt;/a&gt; and austerity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2. &amp;nbsp;Men and women &lt;a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/beginning/2013/04/17/money-conversations-what-we-hear-versus-what-was-s.aspx"&gt;think about money&lt;/a&gt; differently. &amp;nbsp;(I believe this is why micro finance works.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/P3bdtaNlWoo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/7065942126168172374/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/assorted-links.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7065942126168172374?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7065942126168172374?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/P3bdtaNlWoo/assorted-links.html" title="Assorted Links" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/assorted-links.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYDR3syfSp7ImA9WhBVFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-2084180254592841375</id><published>2013-04-20T11:39:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-20T11:39:36.595-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-20T11:39:36.595-07:00</app:edited><title>Aggregate Demand and Interest Rate Effect</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;object width="320" height="266" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-830e3e006d99dd84" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/get_player"&gt;
&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"&gt;
&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"&gt;
&lt;param name="flashvars" value="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3D830e3e006d99dd84%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330728%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3D772E246ED4A300E99301C1E0984C682479081895.BAE154D76E50F91ECA747AF735EE9F5AD483FABC%26key%3Dck2&amp;amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D830e3e006d99dd84%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DB5hUHasjF5Y_os6buw9NVYXnCp8&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;ps=blogger"&gt;
&lt;embed src="//www.youtube.com/get_player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
width="320" height="266" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
flashvars="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3D830e3e006d99dd84%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330728%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3D772E246ED4A300E99301C1E0984C682479081895.BAE154D76E50F91ECA747AF735EE9F5AD483FABC%26key%3Dck2&amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D830e3e006d99dd84%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DB5hUHasjF5Y_os6buw9NVYXnCp8&amp;autoplay=0&amp;ps=blogger"
allowFullScreen="true" /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
The Aggregate Demand curve assumes that consumers buy a fixed market basket. &amp;nbsp;Assume that in the base year the CPI is 1 and the basket costs $100. &amp;nbsp;If the CPI drops to .5 in the next year, only $50 is needed to buy the fixed market basket. &amp;nbsp;Consumers will save $50 and the supply of savings will increase and the interest rates will decrease. &amp;nbsp;Likewise, if the price level increases in 2, people can't buy the fixed market basket and they will withdraw savings. &amp;nbsp;This will decrease the supply of savings and the interest rate will rise. This illustrates that the AD curve is downward sloping assuming that $Y is fixed. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/gowSAYmww-A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/2084180254592841375/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate_20.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2084180254592841375?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/2084180254592841375?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/gowSAYmww-A/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate_20.html" title="Aggregate Demand and Interest Rate Effect" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate_20.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEECRX8zeip7ImA9WhBVFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-1575617323465412193</id><published>2013-04-20T11:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-20T11:31:04.182-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-20T11:31:04.182-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="real money demand" /><title>Real Money Demand Explained</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;object width="320" height="266" class="BLOGGER-picasa-video" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" data-thumbnail-src="https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-Utr9TbXFR4U/UXLZQCZzrzI/AAAAAAAAEH0/Yv1kiafy6ms/s1600/VID00001.avi"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fredirector.googlevideo.com%2Fvideoplayback%3Fid%3D77c9681964f88e10%26itag%3D18%26source%3Dpicasa%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1369073217%26sparams%3Did%2Citag%2Csource%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%26signature%3DA1D0EFFE181E193BED40DC513988A94BDECA65AB.B104A17CFE973DA5EBEEB0A0D61E39BA61BF33B1%26key%3Dlh1" /&gt;&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /&gt;&lt;param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /&gt;&lt;embed width="320" height="266"  src="http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?videoUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fredirector.googlevideo.com%2Fvideoplayback%3Fid%3D77c9681964f88e10%26itag%3D18%26source%3Dpicasa%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1369073217%26sparams%3Did%2Citag%2Csource%2Cip%2Cipbits%2Cexpire%26signature%3DA1D0EFFE181E193BED40DC513988A94BDECA65AB.B104A17CFE973DA5EBEEB0A0D61E39BA61BF33B1%26key%3Dlh1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
This is a troublesome concept for me. &amp;nbsp;This is how I explain it. &amp;nbsp;Suppose that I always drink four cups of coffee every day. &amp;nbsp;So I must carry enough money every day to buy four cups of coffee. &amp;nbsp;This is my real money demand since I will carry enough money to buy four cups of coffee. &amp;nbsp;When prices increase, my demand for money will increase proportionally. &amp;nbsp;In this video, I carry $2.40 in my pocket to buy 4 cups of coffee that cost 60 cents each. &amp;nbsp;If the cost of coffee increases to 80 cents, then I will carry $3.20 to buy four cups of coffee. &amp;nbsp;You can see that I will demand enough money to buy four cups of coffee which is my real money demand. &amp;nbsp;You can see that the proportion of the change in prices is equal to the proportional increase in the demand for money. &amp;nbsp;Thus, $.80/$.60 = $3.20/$2.40. &amp;nbsp;This is what gives me a problem since some textbooks use the nominal money demand curve and some use real money demand. &amp;nbsp;It's my opinion that every one is okay to use. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-myDlEVrbBt0/UXLd8j9xmJI/AAAAAAAAEH8/d9W1sLBujGM/s1600/RMd.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-myDlEVrbBt0/UXLd8j9xmJI/AAAAAAAAEH8/d9W1sLBujGM/s1600/RMd.png" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
So in the graph to the left, I have shown how money divided the price level is the real money demand. &amp;nbsp;In this graph the interest rate represents the opportunity cost of holding money. &amp;nbsp;At higher interest rates, people will hold less money than at lower rates. &amp;nbsp;The market will clear at 3%. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/kElTFbxmfYQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/1575617323465412193/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/real-money-demand-explained.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/1575617323465412193?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/1575617323465412193?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/kElTFbxmfYQ/real-money-demand-explained.html" title="Real Money Demand Explained" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-myDlEVrbBt0/UXLd8j9xmJI/AAAAAAAAEH8/d9W1sLBujGM/s72-c/RMd.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/real-money-demand-explained.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUDQX4zfSp7ImA9WhBVEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-5397677231787155842</id><published>2013-04-16T02:57:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-16T02:57:50.085-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-16T02:57:50.085-07:00</app:edited><title>Tax Toon</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-48zGGsrCBk0/UW0e8vh3zLI/AAAAAAAAEHQ/JtvXxpaE2VE/s1600/taxtoon.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="281" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-48zGGsrCBk0/UW0e8vh3zLI/AAAAAAAAEHQ/JtvXxpaE2VE/s400/taxtoon.png" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Fox News reported that the IRS collected almost 3 trillion in taxes this year. &amp;nbsp;I don't know how much of the tax revenue goes to entitlements but this cartoon isn't far off. &amp;nbsp;I know my real income is down. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://amosweb.com/"&gt;AmosWeb.com&lt;/a&gt; reports that both real earnings and real income are down which means our wages buy less food and clothing. &amp;nbsp;I know how I will react. &amp;nbsp;I will work less, spend less, and save more. &amp;nbsp;If my actions are like millions, look for aggregate demand to shift back and the recession continue for a very long time. &amp;nbsp;My prediction might not align with the Economist who reported that unemployment is 7.6 for March, down from 7.7. &amp;nbsp;As classical economists note, in the long run wages and prices will adjust to full employment output. &amp;nbsp;I believe we are a long ways away from that long run. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/VNDauyBEfto" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/5397677231787155842/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/tax-toon.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5397677231787155842?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/5397677231787155842?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/VNDauyBEfto/tax-toon.html" title="Tax Toon" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-48zGGsrCBk0/UW0e8vh3zLI/AAAAAAAAEHQ/JtvXxpaE2VE/s72-c/taxtoon.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/tax-toon.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYMQXo9eyp7ImA9WhBWGEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-8164200523026904509</id><published>2013-04-13T03:16:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-13T03:16:20.463-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-13T03:16:20.463-07:00</app:edited><title>What Makes Us Work at Work</title><content type="html">I have been studying behavior economics. &amp;nbsp;Dan Ariely is one of the best. &amp;nbsp;His books are outstanding. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://blog.ted.com/2013/04/10/what-motivates-us-at-work-7-fascinating-studies-that-give-insights/"&gt;In this blog post&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;he is interviewed about what motivates people to work. &amp;nbsp;This is from the introduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="tr_bq"&gt;
&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-top: 1.5em;"&gt;
When you look carefully at the way people work, he says, you find out there’s a lot more at play—and a lot more at stake—than money. In his talk, Ariely provides evidence that we are also driven by meaningful work, by others’ acknowledgement and by the amount of effort we’ve put in: the harder the task is, the prouder we are.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div style="background-color: white; font-family: helvetica, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-top: 1.5em;"&gt;
During the Industrial Revolution, Ariely points out, Adam Smith’s efficiency-oriented, assembly-line approach made sense. But it doesn’t work as well in today’s knowledge economy. Instead, Ariely upholds Karl Marx’s concept that we care much more about a product if we’ve participated from start to finish rather than producing a single part over and over. In other words, in the knowledge economy, efficiency is no longer more important than meaning.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/E3R0Pq11Ffw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/8164200523026904509/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-makes-us-work-at-work.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/8164200523026904509?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/8164200523026904509?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/E3R0Pq11Ffw/what-makes-us-work-at-work.html" title="What Makes Us Work at Work" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/what-makes-us-work-at-work.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQBQ34zeip7ImA9WhBWGE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-6907821801037147423</id><published>2013-04-12T13:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-12T13:59:12.082-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-12T13:59:12.082-07:00</app:edited><title>Aggregate Demand and Interest Rate Effect</title><content type="html">&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;object width="320" height="266" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-d5324ecd039467c6" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/get_player"&gt;
&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"&gt;
&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"&gt;
&lt;param name="flashvars" value="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3Dd5324ecd039467c6%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330729%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3DAF3CF4D9923F22FE7EC02805F20BA18441FBE40F.4960AFF587214EC3F770845A755B5B55DA059833%26key%3Dck2&amp;amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Dd5324ecd039467c6%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DJVnFMyckwXXXHqG_npx1-6oe9OI&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;ps=blogger"&gt;
&lt;embed src="//www.youtube.com/get_player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
width="320" height="266" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
flashvars="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3Dd5324ecd039467c6%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330729%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3DAF3CF4D9923F22FE7EC02805F20BA18441FBE40F.4960AFF587214EC3F770845A755B5B55DA059833%26key%3Dck2&amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3Dd5324ecd039467c6%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DJVnFMyckwXXXHqG_npx1-6oe9OI&amp;autoplay=0&amp;ps=blogger"
allowFullScreen="true" /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;object width="320" height="266" class="BLOG_video_class" id="BLOG_video-6143225fe444fae3" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="//www.youtube.com/get_player"&gt;
&lt;param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"&gt;
&lt;param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"&gt;
&lt;param name="flashvars" value="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3D6143225fe444fae3%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330729%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3DB3CC190A5DB064156F7203B852D1FFEA25F2F853.BBD0EF71AA27765C4347E880FA7E6E2ACB1E9521%26key%3Dck2&amp;amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D6143225fe444fae3%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DvvU6E23wr_kcylQ7BUwCF8ZDG34&amp;amp;autoplay=0&amp;amp;ps=blogger"&gt;
&lt;embed src="//www.youtube.com/get_player" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
width="320" height="266" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"
flashvars="flvurl=http://redirector.googlevideo.com/videoplayback?id%3D6143225fe444fae3%26itag%3D5%26source%3Dblogger%26app%3Dblogger%26cmo%3Dsensitive_content%253Dyes%26ip%3D0.0.0.0%26ipbits%3D0%26expire%3D1371330729%26sparams%3Did,itag,source,ip,ipbits,expire%26signature%3DB3CC190A5DB064156F7203B852D1FFEA25F2F853.BBD0EF71AA27765C4347E880FA7E6E2ACB1E9521%26key%3Dck2&amp;iurl=http://video.google.com/ThumbnailServer2?app%3Dblogger%26contentid%3D6143225fe444fae3%26offsetms%3D5000%26itag%3Dw160%26sigh%3DvvU6E23wr_kcylQ7BUwCF8ZDG34&amp;autoplay=0&amp;ps=blogger"
allowFullScreen="true" /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
These videos explain the interest rate effect and the slope of the aggregate demand curve.&amp;nbsp; These are intended for students taking the AP in May.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/kWiL3E0Qw_I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6907821801037147423/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6907821801037147423?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6907821801037147423?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/kWiL3E0Qw_I/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate.html" title="Aggregate Demand and Interest Rate Effect" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/aggregate-demand-and-interest-rate.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YCQXYzfSp7ImA9WhBWFEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-8420335692227724871</id><published>2013-04-08T02:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-08T02:59:20.885-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-08T02:59:20.885-07:00</app:edited><title>Worst Recession Ever</title><content type="html">The Motley Fool has the entire article &lt;a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/04/05/marchs-jobs-report-in-4-charts.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. (click on graph to enlarge.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qyK6zocQ8Oo/UWKSD-9TLkI/AAAAAAAAEG8/_WA5OyWHzGM/s1600/mf.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="310" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qyK6zocQ8Oo/UWKSD-9TLkI/AAAAAAAAEG8/_WA5OyWHzGM/s400/mf.png" width="400" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
A jobless recovery is one in which GDP grows even when the unemployment rate is above the natural rate. &amp;nbsp;The Bureau of Labor Statistics cites unemployment at 7.7% which is down from the last reporting period. &amp;nbsp;Productivity is increasing and so is income. (&lt;a href="http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=awb&amp;amp;c=stp"&gt;AmosWeb&lt;/a&gt;) &amp;nbsp;This means worker skills are obsolete as the economy replaces workers with capital. &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/8GAE716D7B0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/8420335692227724871/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/worst-recession-ever.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/8420335692227724871?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/8420335692227724871?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/8GAE716D7B0/worst-recession-ever.html" title="Worst Recession Ever" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qyK6zocQ8Oo/UWKSD-9TLkI/AAAAAAAAEG8/_WA5OyWHzGM/s72-c/mf.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/worst-recession-ever.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8BRng4fyp7ImA9WhBWEkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-235976022585907833</id><published>2013-04-06T03:24:00.002-07:00</published><updated>2013-04-06T03:24:17.637-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-04-06T03:24:17.637-07:00</app:edited><title>Latest Jobs</title><content type="html">The labor participation rate is now the lowest since the mid 80s.  This is from the latest&lt;a href="http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm"&gt; BLS.gov&lt;/a&gt; report:
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
The civilian labor force declined by 496,000 over the month, and the labor force
participation rate decreased by 0.2 percentage point to 63.3 percent. The employment-
population ratio, at 58.5 percent, changed little. (See table A-1.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;a href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u7nSAgF5IY8/UV_3uP7dXLI/AAAAAAAAEGs/FqCUw-W18cY/s1600/aaabbbb.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="236" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u7nSAgF5IY8/UV_3uP7dXLI/AAAAAAAAEGs/FqCUw-W18cY/s320/aaabbbb.png" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;The LFPR equals the labor force divided by the civilian non-institutional population. &amp;nbsp;The labor force is made up of those employed and unemployed. &amp;nbsp;When workers drop out of the labor force completely, the unemployment rate could go down. &amp;nbsp;I think this is the case with the latest numbers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/yNQkRPqygYk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/235976022585907833/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/latest-jobs.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/235976022585907833?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/235976022585907833?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/yNQkRPqygYk/latest-jobs.html" title="Latest Jobs" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-u7nSAgF5IY8/UV_3uP7dXLI/AAAAAAAAEGs/FqCUw-W18cY/s72-c/aaabbbb.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/04/latest-jobs.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0IFQ3g4eyp7ImA9WhBXF04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-6907240212465766927</id><published>2013-03-31T05:05:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-03-31T05:05:12.633-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-03-31T05:05:12.633-07:00</app:edited><title>Job Satisfaction</title><content type="html">I have often thought that some people have a preference to repetition and like working in "boring" jobs. &amp;nbsp;A person's intellect is not a major factor in the preference of liking repetition. &amp;nbsp;It is this preference that I believe make ten's of thousands run marathons or habitually wash their cars. &amp;nbsp;Does this preference lead to job selection?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a rigorous article, the &lt;a href="http://heteconomist.com/why-so-many-jobs-are-crappy/"&gt;Heteconomist&lt;/a&gt; lays out his thoughts on the matter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tyler Cowen, begins his post with:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote class="tr_bq"&gt;
&lt;span style="background-color: white; color: #111111; font-family: Arial, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; line-height: 21.984375px;"&gt;The first key point is that if you learn more on the job on a regular basis (i.e., your job is interesting), you become harder to replace from the point of view of your boss.&amp;nbsp; Over time you win more of the bargaining surplus.&amp;nbsp; That means we end up with jobs with an inefficiently low level of learning and jobs are too boring relative to an optimum.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I love labor market articles. &amp;nbsp;I would have built the learning curve differently, but I'm not on the same level as these economists.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/Z-g4YPvzFFA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/6907240212465766927/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/03/job-satisfaction.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6907240212465766927?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/6907240212465766927?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/Z-g4YPvzFFA/job-satisfaction.html" title="Job Satisfaction" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/03/job-satisfaction.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak4NRXw5eyp7ImA9WhBXFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26804662.post-7458852998779045603</id><published>2013-03-29T07:56:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2013-03-29T07:56:34.223-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-03-29T07:56:34.223-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MR=MC" /><title>When MR is Greater Than MC</title><content type="html">Will a firm produce at the point where marginal cost is the least or where marginal revenue equals marginal cost? &amp;nbsp;A firm that wants to maximize profits will produce at the MR = MC point because it captures all of the revenue possible with a given price. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wjzq2Uc64jA/UVWogNCjrUI/AAAAAAAAEGU/fVjcdUrkIHk/s1600/today1.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="197" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wjzq2Uc64jA/UVWogNCjrUI/AAAAAAAAEGU/fVjcdUrkIHk/s320/today1.png" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&amp;nbsp;As the graphs shows profit is maximized at 2.3 units. &amp;nbsp;When marginal cost is low, profits are lower than when MR=MC. &amp;nbsp;I conclude that profit max occurs where MR=MC. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This blog is intended to be part of my answer key for a writing assignment I contract for. &amp;nbsp;My suggested answer is too long for the space allotment in my key.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used the following formulas in my graph: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-u4dBQsQVwUc/UVWogSY_qBI/AAAAAAAAEGY/J2rUixzQH80/s1600/today2.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"&gt;&lt;img border="0" height="243" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-u4dBQsQVwUc/UVWogSY_qBI/AAAAAAAAEGY/J2rUixzQH80/s320/today2.png" width="320" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
Total Cost = 2&amp;nbsp;+ .25X^3&lt;br /&gt;
MC = .75X^2&lt;br /&gt;
AVC = .25X^2&lt;br /&gt;
ATC = 2/X&amp;nbsp;+ .25X&lt;br /&gt;
TR = 4X&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used the functions above so that students can see that the theory fits the reality.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~4/X27oHRhixPQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/feeds/7458852998779045603/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/03/when-mr-is-greater-than-mc.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7458852998779045603?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/26804662/posts/default/7458852998779045603?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Mikeroeconomics/~3/X27oHRhixPQ/when-mr-is-greater-than-mc.html" title="When MR is Greater Than MC" /><author><name>Mike Fladlien</name><uri>https://plus.google.com/100473888455935779096</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="32" height="32" src="//lh3.googleusercontent.com/-TeROXeXBSss/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAADpk/7lQVhqmKxMw/s512-c/photo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-wjzq2Uc64jA/UVWogNCjrUI/AAAAAAAAEGU/fVjcdUrkIHk/s72-c/today1.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://mikeroeconomics.blogspot.com/2013/03/when-mr-is-greater-than-mc.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
