<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Military History Blog on the Web</title><link>http://milhist.blogspot.com/</link><description>We are going to use this Blog to announce any changes to our website - new articles, design changes and anything else of interest, as well as point to websites we find usefull</description><language>en</language><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</managingEditor><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:51:53 PDT</lastBuildDate><generator>Blogger http://www.blogger.com</generator><openSearch:totalResults xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">708</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/">25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item><title>Nos.71, 72 and 73 Squadrons, RAF</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/7pHF8xZpyCY/nos71-72-and-73-squadrons-raf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:09:28 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-8004800161724653229</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/71_wwII.html"&gt;No.71 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was the first 'Eagle' Squadron, manned by American volunteers in the year before the American entry into the Second World War.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/72_wwII.html"&gt;No.72 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; began the Second World War as a home based fighter squadron, taking part in the battle of Britain and the offensive sweeps over France, before moving to North Africa late in 1942. The squadron remained in the mediterranean to the end of the war, taking part in the fighting on Sicily, in Italy and the invasion of southern France.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/73_wwII.html"&gt;No.73 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was one of the small number of Hurricane squadrons that moved to France at the start of the Second World War. After operating as a night fighter squadron during the battle of Britain it them moved to the Middle East, taking part in the campaigns in North Africa, in Italy, and in Greece, before ending the war in the Balkans.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-8004800161724653229?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/7pHF8xZpyCY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/06/nos71-72-and-73-squadrons-raf.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nos.56 to 70 Squadrons, RAF</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/njQyGq5Guwc/nos56-to-70-squadrons-raf.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:39:59 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-6772254714065149153</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/56_wwII.html"&gt;No.56 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; all but two months of the Second World War operating Hawker fighters, using Hurricanes during the Battle of Britain before becoming the first squadron to convert to the troublesome Hawker Typhoon, and by the end of the war the squadron was using the high-speed Hawker Tempest on armed reconnaissance missions behind German lines.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/57_wwII.html"&gt;No.57 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; served as a Blenheim squadron during the battle of France in 1940, before in 1941 joining Bomber Command's main force, flying the Lancaster from 1942 until the end of the war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/59_wwII.html"&gt;No.59 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; began the Second World War as a reconnaissance squadron, but spent most of the war serving as an anti-shipping or anti-submarine squadron, flying the very long range Liberator from the summer of 1942.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/60_wwII.html"&gt;No.60 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; served in the Far East throughout the Second World War, originally as a Singapore-based Blenheim squadron and later as a Hurricane equipped ground-attack squadron.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/62_wwII.html"&gt;No.62 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; went through two incarnations during the Second World War. The first was badly mauled in the early days of the war against Japan, while the second was formed from survivors of the defeat in Burma.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/64_wwII.html"&gt;No.64 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; served as a fighter squadron throughout the Second World War, taking part in the battle of Britain and carrying out offensive sweeps over France before ending the war escorting Bomber Command on daylight raids over Germany.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/65_wwII.html"&gt;No.65 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; had a varied wartime career, which included participation in the Battle of Britain, a period spent practising deck landings and spells as a figher-bomber squadron in Normandy and as daylight bomber escorts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/66_wwII.html"&gt;No.66 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; served as a fighter squadron throughout the Second World War, taking part in the Battle of Britain, escorting day bombers over France and joining the 2nd Tactical Air Force during the fighting after D-Day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/67_wwII.html"&gt;No.67 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was one of the few RAF squadrons to spent almost the entire Second World War fighting over Burma.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/68_wwII.html"&gt;No.68 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was formed in January 1941 as a defensive night fighter squadron, and continued to perform that role until it was disbanded in April 1945.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/69_wwII.html"&gt;No.69 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was formed on Malta as a reconnaissance squadron, and spent three years operating a wide range of aircraft from the island, before in 1944 returning to Britain to take part in the invasion of north western Europe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/70_wwII.html"&gt;No.70 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; served as a heavy bomber squadron, first in North Africa and then from bases in Italy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-6772254714065149153?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/njQyGq5Guwc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/06/nos56-to-70-squadrons-raf.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nos.36, 45, 46, 47, 53, 54 and 55 Squadrons</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/npTV6n8pUgk/nos36-45-46-47-53-54-and-55-squadrons.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:55:16 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-4727602237921917378</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/36_wwII.html"&gt;No 36 Squadron (RAF)&lt;/a&gt; began the Second World War as a torpedo bomber squadron based at Singapore, but saw most service as a Wellinton equipped anti-submarine squadron.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/45_wwII.html"&gt;No.45 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; spent the entire Second World War operating in the east, at first as a Blenheim bomber squadron operating from Egypt, from where it took part in the campaigns in the Western Desert, Italian East Africa and Syria, before moving to Burma early in 1942, where it eventually operated as a ground attack squadron, first with the Vultee Vengeance dive bomber and later with fighter-bomber Mosquitoes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/46_wwII.html"&gt;No.46 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; began the Second World War as a Hawker Hurricane squadron, fighting in Norway, in the battle of Britain and on Malta. It then became a Beaufighter day and night fighter squadron, operating around the Mediterranean, before in 1945 returning to Britain to become a transport squadron.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/47_wwII.html"&gt;No.47 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; was one of the few squadrons to use the Vickers Wellesley in combat, using them against Italian forces in East Africa, before converting to the Beaufort then Beaufighter for anti-submarine and anti-shipping work in the Mediterranean. By the end of the war the squadron was operating as a ground attack unit, using the Mosquito to attack Japanese targets in Burma.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/53_wwII.html"&gt;No.53 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; started the Second World War as a strategic reconnaissance unit equipped with the Bristol Blenheim, but spent most of the war flying anti-submarine patrols, eventually using the very long range Consolidated Liberator.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/54_wwII.html"&gt;No.54 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; spent the entire Second World War flying the Supermarine Spitfire. During 1940 it helped to protect the Dunkirk evacuations and took part in the Battle of Britain, before in the summer of 1942 it moved to Australia, arriving after the worst of the Japanese raids were over.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/air/units/RAF/55_wwII.html"&gt;No.55 Squadron&lt;/a&gt; spent almost the entire Second World War serving as a day bomber squadron, first in North Africa and then on Sicily and for the entire duration of the campaign in Italy.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-4727602237921917378?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/npTV6n8pUgk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/06/nos36-45-46-47-53-54-and-55-squadrons.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Carentan, the Cotentin, Cherbourg, Operation Epsom</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/urwmV3MQ-oU/carentan-cotentin-cherbourg-operation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:54:12 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-1017978758281530382</guid><description>The small town of &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_carentan.html"&gt;Carentan&lt;/a&gt; occupied a pivotal position between Omaha and Utah Beaches, and its capture was one of the most important American priorities in the days immediately after D-Day&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_cotentin.html"&gt;campaign in the Cotentin Peninsula (6-30 June 1944)&lt;/a&gt; was the first major Allied advance after the D-Day landings, and ended with the capture of the port of Cherbourg, seen by the Allies as one of the most important objectives of Operation Overlord&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_cherbourg.html"&gt;capture of the port of Cherbourg&lt;/a&gt; was one of the most important early objectives for the Allies after the D-Day landings&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/operation_epsom.html"&gt;Operation Epsom (26-30 June 1944) &lt;/a&gt;, or the battle of the Odon,was the first major British offensive to be launched after the D-Day landings, and was a successful attempt to force the Germans to concentrate their armoured units against the British and Canadians, at the eastern end of the Normandy beachhead&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-1017978758281530382?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/urwmV3MQ-oU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/06/carentan-cotentin-cherbourg-operation.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Douglas A-26 Invader</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/voygjcFBMas/douglas-26-invader.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 10:53:01 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-2135037164895513625</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26_intro.html"&gt;Douglas A-26 Invader&lt;/a&gt; was the best medium bomber to see service with the USAAF during the Second World War, but production delays meant that it wasn't available in large numbers until late in 1944, and it was only used in significant numbers by the Ninth Air Force in Europe.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26B.html"&gt;Douglas A-26B&lt;/a&gt; the gun-nosed version of the Invader medium bomber, and was designed to carry out both bombing and low level strafing attacks, a combination of functions that was seen as the most effective way to attack the many Japanese island bases scattered across the Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26C.html"&gt;Douglas A-26C Invader&lt;/a&gt; differed from the A-26B in having a transparent bombardier's nose in place of that version's solid gun carrying nose.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26D.html"&gt;Douglas A-26D Invader&lt;/a&gt; was an improved version of the solid-nosed A-26B, with more powerful engines.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26E.html"&gt;Douglas A-26E Invader&lt;/a&gt; was to have been a version of the glass nosed A-26C but with the same more powerful 2,100hp Chevrolet-built R-2800-83 engines as the A-26D.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_XA-26F.html"&gt;Douglas XA-26F&lt;/a&gt; was a jet-augmented version of the Invader, powered by two 2,100hp R-2800-83 radial engines and by a General Electric J31 turbojet.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_JD_Invader.html"&gt;Douglas JD Invader&lt;/a&gt; was the designation given to 141 Douglas A-26 Invaders that were operated by the US Navy as utility aircraft, target tugs and target drone launching and controlling aircraft.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26K_counter_invader.html"&gt;On Mark B-26K Counter Invader&lt;/a&gt; was a major redesign of the Invader, produced in the mid 1960s for use in Vietnam.&lt;br /&gt;Although the Douglas A-26 Invader made its combat debut in the Pacific it only played a small part in the &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26_against_japan.html"&gt;war against Japan&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_A-26_against_germany.html"&gt;Douglas A-26 Invader saw most combat during the Second World War against the Germans&lt;/a&gt;, serving in significant numbers with the Ninth Air Force.&lt;br /&gt;The outbreak of the Korean War caught the USAF by surprise, and in the middle of converted from piston engined aircraft to jets. As a result a number of Second World War era aircraft had to be rushed back into front line service, including the &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_Korea.html"&gt;Douglas B-26 Invader&lt;/a&gt; (designated as the A-26 until 1947)&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_Vietnam.html"&gt;Douglas B-26 Invader was involved in the fighting in Vietnam&lt;/a&gt; for nearly twenty years, from 1951 when they were used by the French, until 1969 when the last aircraft in American service were withdrawn&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-2135037164895513625?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/voygjcFBMas" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/06/douglas-26-invader.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Churchill AVRE and other specials</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/gYqgLhT0dP8/churchill-avre-and-other-specials.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:43:08 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-1070112381741891373</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_AVRE.html"&gt;Churchill AVRE (Assault Vehicle, Royal Engineers)&lt;/a&gt; was developed after the Dieppe raid in an attempt to make combat engineers less vulnerable while they were attempting to destroy enemy defences.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_carrot.html"&gt;'Carrot' Explosive Device &lt;/a&gt;was a light framework that could be attached to the front of a Churchill tank and that was designed to allow small explosive charges to be dropped into place&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_onion.html"&gt;'Onion' Explosive Device&lt;/a&gt; was the first of two frames designed to allow explosive charges to be moved into place using a Churchill tank.&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_AVRE_goat.html"&gt;Churchill AVRE with 'Goat' Explosive Device&lt;/a&gt; was the only one of a series of British attempts to use a tank to place an explosive charge in place to enter production during the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_ark.html"&gt;Churchill Ark&lt;/a&gt; was an expendable bridging tank produced by fitting folding ramps at both ends of a turretless Churchill tank&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_churchill_jumbo.html"&gt;Churchill 'Jumbo' Bridging Tank&lt;/a&gt; carried a 30ft long bridge which it could lower into place in 1 minute 35 seconds&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-1070112381741891373?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/gYqgLhT0dP8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/churchill-avre-and-other-specials.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Geyr von Schweppenburg, Dollman, Hausser</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/OzM8_BtrtUk/geyr-von-schweppenburg-dollman-hausser.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:41:02 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-6485760400026296451</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_dollman_friedrich.html"&gt;General Friedrich Dollman (1876-1944)&lt;/a&gt; was the commander of the German 7th Army at the time of the D-Day landings, with direct responsibility for the defence of the Normandy coastline&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_geyr_von_schweppenburg.html"&gt;General Leo Freiherr Geyr von Schweppenburg (1886-1974)&lt;/a&gt; was an acknowledged expect in armoured warfare who had a successful career on the eastern front before being posted to the west, where he clashed with Rommel over the correct tactics to use against the expected Allied invasion&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_hausser_paul.html"&gt;Paul Hausser (1880-1972)&lt;/a&gt; was the most capable general to serve in the Waffen-SS, after playing an important role in the creation of the armed wing of the SS.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-6485760400026296451?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/OzM8_BtrtUk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/geyr-von-schweppenburg-dollman-hausser.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>J Lawton Collins and Leonard Gerow</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/wdq8nlheioM/j-lawton-collins-and-leonard-gerow.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:34:45 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-2690440933869257222</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_collins_j_lawton.html"&gt;Joseph Lawton Collins (1896-1987)&lt;/a&gt; was one of the most capable American Corps commanders of the Second World War, and one of a small number of senior officers to serve in both the Pacific and European fronts, commanding the 25th Division on Guadalcanal and the 7th Corps from D-Day to the end of the war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_gerow_leonard.html"&gt;Leonard Gerow (1888-1972)&lt;/a&gt; was the commander of the US 5th Corps from July 1943 until the start of 1945, and led it from Omaha Beach into Germany&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-2690440933869257222?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/wdq8nlheioM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/j-lawton-collins-and-leonard-gerow.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>D-Day, 6 June 1944</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/ARO9tKMSKTY/d-day-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 09:27:55 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-7236561065670242996</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_D-Day.html"&gt;D-Day landings of 6 June 1944&lt;/a&gt; were one of the most significant moments of the Second World War, and marked the point when the combined military force of the Western allies were finally brought to bear fully against Germany.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-7236561065670242996?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/ARO9tKMSKTY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/d-day-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Overlord and D-Day Picture Gallery</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/zvFMfw8zyo0/overlord-and-d-day-picture-gallery.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:45:38 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-7473251905700615710</guid><description>This week we open our biggest picture gallery yet, devoted to &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/pictures_Overlord.html"&gt;Operation Overlord and the D-Day landings&lt;/a&gt;, starting with 32 pictures and 12 maps and with many more to come&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-7473251905700615710?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/zvFMfw8zyo0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/overlord-and-d-day-picture-gallery.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Major General Dietrich Kraiss</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/xjrrHW0tiCs/major-general-dietrich-kraiss.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:44:46 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-4466899798804926412</guid><description>As the commander of the 352nd Infantry Division &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_kraiss_dietrich.html"&gt;Major General Dietrich Kraiss&lt;/a&gt; was responsible for the defence of the section of the Normandy Coast that included Omaha Beach and part of Gold Beach, and his deployments and actions on D-Day would play a part in the Allied victory.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-4466899798804926412?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/xjrrHW0tiCs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/major-general-dietrich-kraiss.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>British and US Airborne Operations on D-Day</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/4LqPb7nOZd0/british-and-us-airborne-operations-on-d.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:44:13 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-4236563541319153481</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_D-Day_UK_airborne.html"&gt;British Airborne Operations on D-Day, 6 June 1944&lt;/a&gt;: The eastern flank of the Allied beachhead on D-Day was formed by the troops of the British 6th Airborne Division, who had the job of destroying the bridges across the River Dives and capturing intact those across the River Orne and the Orne (or Caen in some sources) Canal&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_D-Day_US_airborne.html"&gt;US Airborne Operations on D-Day, 6 June 1944&lt;/a&gt;: One of the most daring elements of the D-Day landings was the insertion of two full US airborne divisions in the Cotentin peninsula, on the western flank of the Allied beachhead, where they played a vital part in the success of the landing on Utah Beach and helped to cause so much confusion that the Germans were unable to launch a coherent counterattack against either American beach&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-4236563541319153481?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/4LqPb7nOZd0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/british-and-us-airborne-operations-on-d.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Gold Beach, 6 June 1944</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/ugBOqbzzbrc/gold-beach-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:43:28 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-1642814858384290368</guid><description>The landing on &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_gold_beach.html"&gt;Gold Beach&lt;/a&gt; was one of the more successful of the D-Day landings, and by the end of 6 June the British had penetrated the German's coastal defences and were on the verge of liberating Bayeux, which on 7 June became the first French town to be liberated&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-1642814858384290368?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/ugBOqbzzbrc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/gold-beach-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Juno Beach, 6 June 1944</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/MW4Bm1Fh2yk/juno-beach-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:42:08 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-2573688755299592674</guid><description>The landing on &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_juno_beach.html"&gt;Juno Beach&lt;/a&gt; was the main Canadian contribution on D-Day, and saw the Canadian 3rd Infantry Division and 2nd Armoured Brigade overcome some of the strongest German defences and a late arrival to achieve the deepest penetration into France of any Allied troops on 6 June&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-2573688755299592674?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/MW4Bm1Fh2yk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/juno-beach-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Sword Beach, 6 June 1944</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/HlgXGe6iiRo/sword-beach-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:41:44 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-1178881985956655245</guid><description>The troops landing on &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_sword_beach.html"&gt;Sword Beach&lt;/a&gt; on 6 June had the most important task on D-Day – to protect the eastern flank of the entire landing area against the possibility of a major German armoured counterattack from the east, while at the same time taking part in the attack on Caen&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-1178881985956655245?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/HlgXGe6iiRo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/sword-beach-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title></title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/9nLbSuRcBDg/landing-on-omaha-beach-was-hardest.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:40:58 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-2999320999422156543</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_omaha_beach.html"&gt;landing on Omaha Beach&lt;/a&gt; was the hardest fought and most costly of the D-Day landings, and the one that came closest to failure. A combination of a strong defensive position, rough seas, the loss of most of the supporting tanks and artillery, a too-short naval bombardment and an ineffective aerial bombardment saw the first wave of American troops pinned down on the water's edge, and although by the end of the day the landing was secure the Omaha beachhead was still less than a mile deep.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-2999320999422156543?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/9nLbSuRcBDg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/landing-on-omaha-beach-was-hardest.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Utah Beach, 6 June 1944</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/0pFophPtUQE/utah-beach-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:22:45 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-5910811799301825702</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_utah_beach.html"&gt;landings on Utah Beach (6 June 1944)&lt;/a&gt; were the most westerly and perhaps the easiest of the D-Day landings, due in part to the actions of the American airborne divisions operating inland from the beach and partly to a strong tide which swept the landing craft a kilometre to the south of their intended landing point&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-5910811799301825702?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/0pFophPtUQE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/utah-beach-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Operation Gambit (2-6 June 1944)</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/onEvrERBISI/operation-gambit-2-6-june-1944.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:22:14 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-946189350852305653</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/operation_gambit.html"&gt;Operation Gambit (2-6 June 1944)&lt;/a&gt; was one of the smaller operations that made up the D-Day landings and saw ten men in two British mini-submarines spend three days on the sea-floor off the Normandy beaches so that they could transmit a sonar signal to guide the DD tanks onto the right part of the beach&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-946189350852305653?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/onEvrERBISI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/operation-gambit-2-6-june-1944.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>LCP(L), LCP(R) and LCVP Landing Craft</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/8YWlvZ-cQwk/lcpl-lcpr-and-lcvp-landing-craft.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:21:00 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-1077893782699961618</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_landing_craft_personnel_large.html"&gt;Landing Craft, Personnel (Large) (LCP(L))&lt;/a&gt; was the first purpose-build landing craft to be acquired by the US Marine Corps, and was the first in a series of designs that culminated in the LCVP, one of the most important Allied weapons of the Second World War&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_landing_craft_personnel_ramp.html"&gt;Landing Craft, Personnel (Ramp) (LCP(R))&lt;/a&gt; was developed during 1941 by Andrew Higgins to solve the biggest problem with the basic LCP(L) – the difficulties encountered in disembarking over the sides of the craft, and was the first version of the Higgins Boat to feature a bow ramp.&lt;br /&gt;The sight of a row of &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_landing_craft_vehicle_personnel.html"&gt;Landing Craft, Vehicle Personnels (LCVP)&lt;/a&gt; coming in to land on a hostile beach is one of the most familiar images of the Second World War. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-1077893782699961618?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/8YWlvZ-cQwk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/lcpl-lcpr-and-lcvp-landing-craft.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Martin B-26 Marauder Combat Record</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/QLEvA0qzTIk/martin-b-26-marauder-combat-record.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:19:54 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-8958046052066739927</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_Pacific.html"&gt;Martin B-26 Marauder had a short combat career in the Pacific&lt;/a&gt;. After playing a part in the early fighting on New Guinea, at Guadalcanal and even at Midway the type was withdraw from the Pacific during 1943, but this early combat experience did help overcome the aircraft's early poor reputation&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_mediterranean.html"&gt;Martin B-26 Marauder played an important part in the fighting in North Africa and Italy&lt;/a&gt;, first arriving in the theatre at the end of 1942 and remaining in service in large numbers until the start of 1945.&lt;br /&gt;Although the &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_RAF.html"&gt;RAF received a sizable number of B-26 Marauders&lt;/a&gt;, only two squadrons were ever equipped with the type, both in the Desert Air Force, and only one Marauder squadron was ever active at any one time&lt;br /&gt;The controversial &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_ETO.html"&gt;Martin B-26 Marauder saw most service with the Ninth Air Force&lt;/a&gt;, operating with eight Bombardment Groups. After a terrible introduction into the European Theatre as a low-level bomber the B-26 found its niche as a medium bomber, and ended the war with the best loss ratio of any bomber in the Ninth Air Force&lt;br /&gt;The Martin B-26 Marauder was used in large numbers by the revived &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_Free_French.html"&gt;French Armée de l'Air&lt;/a&gt; from 1943, and was used during the fighting in Italy and southern France. The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_SAAF.html"&gt;South Africa Air Force received 100 Marauders IIs&lt;/a&gt;, using them to equip five squadrons of the Desert Air Force, although by the time the Marauders began to arrive all five squadrons had moved to Italy, where they remained until the end of the war&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-8958046052066739927?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/QLEvA0qzTIk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/martin-b-26-marauder-combat-record.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Martin B-26 Marauder Development and Variants</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/4fpWpUy2pUM/martin-b-26-marauder-development-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:18:48 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-6464245800211346467</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26_intro.html"&gt;Martin B-26 Marauder &lt;/a&gt;was one of the more controversial American aircraft of the Second World War, earning an early reputation as a killer aircraft before going on to suffer the lowest loss rate of any American bomber in the European theatre&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26.html"&gt;Martin B-26 Marauder &lt;/a&gt;was the designation given to the first 201 Marauders, ordered straight off the drawing board in 1940 and delivered during 1941. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26A.html"&gt;Martin B-26A Marauder&lt;/a&gt; was the second production version of the aircraft. It differed from the B-26 in having the 0.30in nose and tail guns replaced with more powerful 0.50in guns, and by having the fittings for an auxiliary fuel tank in the aft bomb bay. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26B.html"&gt;Martin B-26B&lt;/a&gt; was the most numerous version of the Marauder. At first it differed from earlier versions in having more powerful engines and increased armament, but starting with the 642nd aircraft it was also given longer wings and larger tail fin in an attempt to make it easier for inexperienced pilots to fly&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26C.html"&gt;Martin B-26C Marauder&lt;/a&gt; was the designation given to those B-26s built at Martin's factory in Omaha, Nebraska&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_XB-26D.html"&gt;Martin XB-26D Marauder&lt;/a&gt; was the designation given to a single B-26 that was modified to test a wing de-icing system that used ducts to direct hot air from the engines onto the wings&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The designation &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26E.html"&gt;Martin B-26E Marauder&lt;/a&gt; was associated with two different projects, involved either an adjustment of the angle of incidence of the wings or the movement of the aircraft's dorsal turret.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26F.html"&gt;Martin B-26F&lt;/a&gt; saw the last major change to the design of the Marauder medium bomber, a 3.5 degrees increase in the angle of incidence of the wing, which was introduced to improve the aircraft's poor take-off performance&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_B-26G.html"&gt;Martin B-26G&lt;/a&gt; was the final production version of the Marauder bomber and was part of an effort to increase the number of parts that Army and Navy aircraft had in common. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_XB-26H.html"&gt;Martin XB-26H Marauder&lt;/a&gt; was the designation given to a single TB-26G trainer that was modified to test out a new arrangement of landing gear that was being designed for the new generation of jet bombers. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_AT-23_Marauder.html"&gt;Martin AT-23&lt;/a&gt; was the first designation given to a number of Marauder bombers converted to act as target tugs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-6464245800211346467?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/4fpWpUy2pUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/martin-b-26-marauder-development-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Harmon. Brett and Andrews</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/CA4HLBN5fuA/harmon-brett-and-andrews.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:15:12 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-5830928140005049002</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_harmon_MF.html"&gt;Millard F. Harmon (1888-1945)&lt;/a&gt; was a senior American airman of the Second World War who spent most of the war serving in the Pacific, taking part in the fighting in the Solomon Islands before holding a number of overlapping and sometimes contradictory positions under Nimitz in the central Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_brett_GH.html"&gt;George Howard Brett (1886-1963)&lt;/a&gt; was a senior USAAF officer who was on a tour of the Middle East and China at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, and in the aftermath took command of all American forces in Australia in December 1941, holding that post through some of the disastrous early fighting in the Pacific.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_andrews_FM.html"&gt;Frank Maxwell Andrews (1884-1943)&lt;/a&gt; was a pioneer of strategic air power and a senior USAAF officer who served in the Caribbean, the Mediterranean and briefly as commander of the European Theatre of Operations, US Army (ETOUSA) while Eisenhower was in North Africa&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-5830928140005049002?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/CA4HLBN5fuA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/harmon-brett-and-andrews.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hap Arnold, Frederick Anderson, John K. Cannon</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/q-x66JqaHZE/hap-arnold-frederick-anderson-john-k.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 08:14:19 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-8942211940151564371</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_arnold_hap.html"&gt;General Henry Harley 'Hap' Arnold (1886-1950)&lt;/a&gt; was the most senior American airman of the Second World War, and a dedicated believer in the power of strategic bombing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_anderson_f.html"&gt;Major General Frederick Anderson (1905-1969)&lt;/a&gt; was an American pioneer of strategic air warfare. First as commander of VIII Bomber Command and then as deputy commander of the U.S. Strategic Air Forces in Europe he played a major role in the American bombing campaign against Germany&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/people_cannon_jk.html"&gt;General John K. Cannon (1895-1955)&lt;/a&gt; was a senior USAAF officer who by the end of the Second World War had risen to command the Mediterranean Allied Air Force, having spent most of the war in that theatre.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-8942211940151564371?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/q-x66JqaHZE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/05/hap-arnold-frederick-anderson-john-k.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Operation Downfall Part Four</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/SXSVvVpq5jI/operation-downfall-part-four.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:36:36 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-6130685128251123640</guid><description>&lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/wars_downfall4.html"&gt;Part four of our series on Operation Downfall&lt;/a&gt;, the planned invasion of Japan, looks at the Allied plans for Operations Olympic and Coronet.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-6130685128251123640?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/SXSVvVpq5jI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/04/operation-downfall-part-four.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Royal Aircraft Factory R.E. series</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~3/tQSwRjpht4A/royal-aircraft-factory-re-series.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (John Rickard)</author><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:36:04 PDT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7072498.post-2733998130469393860</guid><description>The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE1.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.1&lt;/a&gt; was a refined version of the B.E.2, originally designed to be light enough to carry armour plating without reducing its performance but that was actually used as a test bed for experiments in stability&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_HRE2.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory H.R.E.2&lt;/a&gt; was a floatplane biplane with some similarity to the B.E.2, developed at the Royal Aircraft Factory in 1913-14.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE3.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.3&lt;/a&gt; was a two-seat reconnaissance aircraft similar to the R.E.2 with its floats removed but with a more powerful Austro-Daimler engine.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE4.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.4&lt;/a&gt; was a design for an aircraft capable of operating from small fields surrounded by high trees.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE5.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.5&lt;/a&gt; was the first aircraft in the Factory's Reconnaissance Experiment series to enter production, although only in small numbers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_HRE6.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory H.R.E.6&lt;/a&gt; was a design for a three-seat floatplane biplane.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE7.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.7&lt;/a&gt; was based on a high altitude version of the R.E.5. Although it was produced in relatively large numbers the Royal Flying Corps never really had a use for the aircraft and its front line career only lasted for six months in the first half of 1916.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE8.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.8 &lt;/a&gt;was the standard Corps Reconnaissance aircraft of the RFC and RAF in the second half of the First World War and superseded the B.E.2c and B.E.2e, the much maligned aircraft that had performed that role since 1914&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/weapons_RAF_RE9.html"&gt;Royal Aircraft Factory R.E.9&lt;/a&gt; was a version of the &lt;a href="http://www.historyofwar.org/weapons_RAF_RE8.html"&gt;R.E.8&lt;/a&gt; that had its unequal span wings replaced with the two-bay equal span wings of the B.E.2d.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7072498-2733998130469393860?l=milhist.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MilitaryHistoryBlogOnTheWeb/~4/tQSwRjpht4A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://milhist.blogspot.com/2009/04/royal-aircraft-factory-re-series.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
