<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:ymaps="http://api.maps.yahoo.com/Maps/V2/AnnotatedMaps.xsd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Ming Campbell</title>
	
	<link>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk</link>
	<description>Liberal Democrat MP for North East Fife</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MingCampbell" /><feedburner:info uri="mingcampbell" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><media:keywords>Ming,Menzies,Campbell,MP,UK,Liberal,Democrats,Politics,Speeches,Podcasts,Lib,Dems,LibDems</media:keywords><media:category scheme="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">Politics</media:category><itunes:author>Ming Campbell MP</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:keywords>Ming,Menzies,Campbell,MP,UK,Liberal,Democrats,Politics,Speeches,Podcasts,Lib,Dems,LibDems</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>Podcasts and speeches from Ming Campbell MP, Leader of the UK Liberal Democrats</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>Podcasts and speeches from Ming Campbell MP, Leader of the UK Liberal Democrats</itunes:summary><itunes:category text="Politics" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>MingCampbell</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Afghanistan | Business of the House | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/-KjycPcD32w/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-09a.496.0&amp;m=40438#g503.4#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=2dd47363363568c27c42f8a863d440df</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope that my right hon. Friend will excuse me if I return to the issue of the attitude of the United States and of the French, but there is a common background. Each country is in the throes of... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-09a.496.0&#38;m=40438#g503.4">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.503.4/1">I hope that my right hon. Friend will excuse me if I return to the issue of the attitude of the United States and of the French, but there is a common background. Each country is in the throes of an acrimonious presidential election, and it leads me to the conclusion that statements may be made for political rather than military reasons. If some of the predictions, based on what Mr Panetta has said and has never withdrawn, were to be fulfilled, the</p><p pid="a.503.4/2">military position of British troops would be substantially altered. Can we be satisfied that both my right hon. Friend and the Secretary of State for Defence are aware of that and are ready to take steps if necessary to protect the interests of British forces?</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/-KjycPcD32w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/09/afghanistan-business-of-the-house-commons-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-09a.496.0&amp;m=40438#g503.4</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Engagements | Oral Answers to Questions – Prime Minister | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/mgF3vCzTS2g/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-08a.294.9&amp;m=40438#g304.5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=387bd93498a28d96b6496ebcad76f103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What confidence can we have that unilateral intervention by Russia will put an end to the terrible violence in Syria? </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-08a.294.9&#38;m=40438#g304.5">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.304.5/1">What confidence can we have that unilateral intervention by Russia will put an end to the terrible violence in Syria?</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/mgF3vCzTS2g" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/08/engagements-oral-answers-to-questions-prime-minister-commons-debates-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-08a.294.9&amp;m=40438#g304.5</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Close Season For Hare Shooting</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/zXCAE7QoI1k/2531.htm</link>
		<comments>http://www.edms.org.uk/2010-12/2531.htm#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EDM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.edms.org.uk/edms/2010-12/2531#10088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Menzies Campbell has signed EDM2531. Motion reads: "That this House deplores the shooting of hares throughout their breeding season as cruel and unnecessary; notes that in Scotland the brown hare and mountain hare now have close seasons to protect nurs... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.edms.org.uk/2010-12/2531.htm">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Menzies Campbell has signed EDM2531. Motion reads: "That this House deplores the shooting of hares throughout their breeding season as cruel and unnecessary; notes that in Scotland the brown hare and mountain hare now have close seasons to protect nursing mothers and their dependent young; and calls on the Government to confer similar protection upon these icons of the British countryside."<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/zXCAE7QoI1k" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/08/close-season-for-hare-shooting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.edms.org.uk/2010-12/2531.htm</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria | Oral Answers to Questions – Home Department | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/no_4K72NLD0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06c.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=b90f61b77752ffcddc3710afc324ba8f</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle.... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06c.23.0&#38;m=40438#g30.2">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="c.30.2/1">Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle. In this case, is not the immediate cost being paid in the broken bodies of children wrapped in burial sheets and the anguish of their parents? My right hon. Friend clearly needs no urging about the urgency with which he should fulfil the objectives he has properly set out, but may I say that he is most well placed when he takes the view that there should be the widest possible coalition of the willing throughout the world&#8212;as, indeed, the vote in the Security Council emphasised&#8212;so that what the United Nations was unable to do might be achieved on a much broader basis through the maintenance of pressure on Syria?</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/no_4K72NLD0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/06/syria-oral-answers-to-questions-home-department-commons-debates-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06c.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria | Oral Answers to Questions – Home Department | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/OHHCX6BLu0E/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06b.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=d17ab7cc22a25fea1bc69df491c32259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle.... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06b.23.0&#38;m=40438#g30.2">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="b.30.2/1">Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle. In this case, is not the immediate cost being paid in the broken bodies of children wrapped in burial sheets and the anguish of their parents? My right hon. Friend clearly needs no urging about the urgency with which he should fulfil the objectives he has properly set out, but may I say that he is most well placed when he takes the view that there should be the widest possible coalition of the willing throughout the world&#8212;as, indeed, the vote in the Security Council emphasised&#8212;so that what the United Nations was unable to do might be achieved on a much broader basis through the maintenance of pressure on Syria?</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/OHHCX6BLu0E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/06/syria-oral-answers-to-questions-home-department-commons-debates-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06b.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Syria | Oral Answers to Questions – Home Department | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/9CuexosBOkY/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06a.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=ff19efff1d6470a19db753523c6a4960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle.... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06a.23.0&#38;m=40438#g30.2">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.30.2/1">Is it not clear that the exercise of the veto by any permanent member of the Security Council always comes at a cost? The shameful events of last Saturday will be no exception to this principle. In this case, is not the immediate cost being paid in the broken bodies of children wrapped in burial sheets and the anguish of their parents? My right hon. Friend clearly needs no urging about the urgency with which he should fulfil the objectives he has properly set out, but may I say that he is most well placed when he takes the view that there should be the widest possible coalition of the willing throughout the world&#8212;as, indeed, the vote in the Security Council emphasised&#8212;so that what the United Nations was unable to do might be achieved on a much broader basis through the maintenance of pressure on Syria?</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/9CuexosBOkY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/06/syria-oral-answers-to-questions-home-department-commons-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-02-06a.23.0&amp;m=40438#g30.2</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Aircraft Carriers | Defence | Written Answers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/dIHZQa7OKjs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-02-01a.92453.h&amp;m=40438#g92453.q0#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=87335d477038391f34dc1f5efe320710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To ask the Secretary of State for Defence  (1)  pursuant to the answer of 12 January 2012, Official Report, column 416W, on aircraft carriers, whether his Department has conducted, or plans to... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-02-01a.92453.h&#38;m=40438#g92453.q0">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.650W.2/1">To ask the Secretary of State for Defence </p><p class="numindent" pid="a.650W.2/2" qnum="92453">(1)  pursuant to the answer of 12 January 2012, <i>Official Report</i>, column 416W, on aircraft carriers, whether his Department has conducted, or plans to conduct, investigations into the compatibility of advanced arresting gear with the Joint Combat Aircraft; and whether it has contributed, or intends to contribute, resources to investigations carried out by the US;</p><p class="numindent" pid="a.650W.2/3" qnum="92454">(2)  on what date his Department was first made aware of compatibility issues in relation to the advanced arresting gear and the Joint Combat Aircraft.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/dIHZQa7OKjs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/02/01/aircraft-carriers-defence-written-answers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-02-01a.92453.h&amp;m=40438#g92453.q0</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Informal European Council | Oral Answers to Questions – Justice | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/em6e0cGFMNw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31b.677.0&amp;m=40438#g682.2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=622e69c2fb15bfbbf99a8dd4ac7c35f8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will see whether your prediction is justified, Mr Speaker. I begin by praising the pragmatism of the Prime Minister, although I confess to being somewhat surprised that my support for it is... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31b.677.0&#38;m=40438#g682.2">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="b.682.2/1">We will see whether your prediction is justified, Mr Speaker.</p><p pid="b.682.2/2">I begin by praising the pragmatism of the Prime Minister, although I confess to being somewhat surprised that my support for it is not shared throughout the Government Benches. It is especially welcome that he pursued over the weekend a policy of re-engagement with our European partners, which is essential to his long-term objectives of the promotion of growth and the extension of the single market.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/em6e0cGFMNw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/01/31/informal-european-council-oral-answers-to-questions-justice-commons-debates-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31b.677.0&amp;m=40438#g682.2</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Informal European Council | Oral Answers to Questions – Justice | Commons debates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/p_fTjkOn69M/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31a.677.0&amp;m=40438#g682.2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=5750601b89909470adf1bcce373bcbe1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will see whether your prediction is justified, Mr Speaker. I begin by praising the pragmatism of the Prime Minister, although I confess to being somewhat surprised that my support for it is... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31a.677.0&#38;m=40438#g682.2">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.682.2/1">We will see whether your prediction is justified, Mr Speaker.</p><p pid="a.682.2/2">I begin by praising the pragmatism of the Prime Minister, although I confess to being somewhat surprised that my support for it is not shared throughout the Government Benches. It is especially welcome that he pursued over the weekend a policy of re-engagement with our European partners, which is essential to his long-term objectives of the promotion of growth and the extension of the single market.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/p_fTjkOn69M" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/01/31/informal-european-council-oral-answers-to-questions-justice-commons-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2012-01-31a.677.0&amp;m=40438#g682.2</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Sovereignty: Scotland | Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs | Written Answers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/MingCampbell/~3/RnmHTmQvQA8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-01-31a.92455.h&amp;m=40438#g92455.q0#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ming Campbell MP</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hansard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/?guid=d9ad6473156a06bb067adff1cbe5186b</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what communications his Department has received from foreign governments in relation to the Scottish Government's policy of... </p><p class="excerpt_continue"><a class="readmore" href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-01-31a.92455.h&#38;m=40438#g92455.q0">more &#8230; </a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p pid="a.582W.1/1" qnum="92455">To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what communications his Department has received from foreign governments in relation to the Scottish Government's policy of seeking independence for Scotland.</p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/MingCampbell/~4/RnmHTmQvQA8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mingcampbell.org.uk/2012/01/31/sovereignty-scotland-foreign-and-commonwealth-affairs-written-answers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2012-01-31a.92455.h&amp;m=40438#g92455.q0</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<media:credit role="author">Ming Campbell MP</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel>
</rss>

