<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 01:09:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Serena Software</category><category>Business mashups</category><category>Business mashup</category><category>Enterprise Mashups</category><category>Big SOA</category><category>data mashup</category><category>enterprise mashup</category><category>Dion Hinchcliffe</category><category>Guerrilla SOA</category><category>Web 2.0</category><category>ActiveGrid</category><category>BPM</category><category>Enterprise Web 2.0</category><category>JackBe</category><category>Mashup Governance</category><category>SOA Governance</category><category>ZapThink</category><category>Dapper</category><category>Enterprise 2.0</category><category>Google Mashup Editor</category><category>Intel Mash Maker</category><category>QEDWiki</category><category>business analyst</category><category>presentation mashup</category><category>ALF</category><category>Big IT</category><category>Carr</category><category>Central Park</category><category>Coghead</category><category>Dave Chappell</category><category>Denodo</category><category>Eclipse</category><category>Fake Steve Jobs</category><category>Financial Industry</category><category>Gartner</category><category>George Carlin</category><category>HIMS</category><category>HR</category><category>HTML screen scraping</category><category>Higgins</category><category>IT Alignment</category><category>Intel</category><category>John Donne</category><category>Kapow</category><category>Millenials</category><category>NExaWeb</category><category>OpenKapow</category><category>Orchestr8</category><category>Portals</category><category>RSS</category><category>RoboMaker</category><category>SOA Consumers</category><category>SOBA</category><category>Security</category><category>Serena Mashup Composer</category><category>WOA</category><category>WaveMaker</category><category>Yahoo Pipes</category><category>alphaWorks</category><category>bloging</category><category>consumer mashp</category><category>consumer mashup</category><category>coopetition</category><category>eWeek</category><category>frenemies</category><category>froes</category><category>mashups</category><category>semantic web</category><category>wiki</category><title>Business Mashups - mashup applications for and by the business</title><description>Business mashups are new, combining the best of consumer mashups and data mashups with a strong process component. I&#39;ll be answering questions, making comments and otherwise talk about this new trend in building business applications.</description><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>38</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-885187541273324193</guid><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-13T15:16:26.633-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gartner</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Guerrilla SOA</category><title>Gartner says that initial SOA adoption rates are slowing. I think they are wrong.</title><atom:summary type="text">I just read a Government Technology article stating that Gartner says there is a dramatic decrease of organizations planning first-time SOA projects. Here&#39;s the money quote.Since the beginning of 2008, there has been a dramatic fall in the number of organizations that are planning to adopt SOA for the first time. In 2008, this was cut by more than one-half, down to 25 percent from 53 percent in </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/11/gartner-says-that-initial-soa-adoption.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-936025258973752555</guid><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-11-11T10:21:57.039-08:00</atom:updated><title>Hello again, everyone. (Or all two of you)</title><atom:summary type="text">Loyal readers may remember that I stopped writing this blog when my boss instituted a policy requiring all blogs be approved by PR before publication. Since I wouldn&#39;t submit my blog to PR, I stopped writing it, at least under my own name.I&#39;m no longer with my prior company, so it is time to start up this blog again. I&#39;ve got a backlog of issues to write about. So many, in fact, that you can </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/11/hello-again-everyone-or-all-two-of-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-6590414051073515331</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-23T07:52:51.239-07:00</atom:updated><title>Farewell Business Mashups Blog...I don&#39;t want a PR review</title><atom:summary type="text">To all three of my readers out there, I&#39;m sad to say that this will be my last post for this blog.We now have a policy stating that all external communications have to be run through our PR department. Since I&#39;m not comfortable having my blog reviewed, I&#39;m going to stop this one.No need to weep in despair, however. I will be blogging under another name and another account, so keep a </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/06/farewell-business-mashups-blogi-dont.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-2954550549623741160</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-05T09:40:39.562-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">bloging</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Web 2.0</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HR</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">wiki</category><title>IDC says HR to help Web 2.0 adoption. Um...what?</title><atom:summary type="text">I just read an article by INQUIRER.net writer Lawrence Casiraya that had me raising my eyebrows. He interviewed IDC&#39;s Shalini Verma about the concept of &quot;unified communications&quot; and how Web 2.0 technologies such as social networking can help distributed organizations collaborate more effectively.Here&#39;s the money quote.So how can businesses begin to embrace Web 2.0? The task may fall into the </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/06/idc-says-hr-to-help-web-20-adoption.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-1086157949385405787</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:42.732-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big IT</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">business analyst</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Guerrilla SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>News from the mashup trenches</title><atom:summary type="text">I’ve neglected this blog for a while, and now it’s time to get back to it. I didn’t think changing jobs would have much of an effect on my blogging output. Wrong again, Shaw. These days I have to do my reading and blogging mostly after hours, and that does change the dynamic. What takes priority, doing laundry, weeding the garden, helping with homework, balancing the checkbook, playing fetch with</atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/06/news-from-mashup-trenches.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-1056999571321623292</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:42.745-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Central Park</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Financial Industry</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Mashups in the financial sector aren&#39;t just for the back office</title><atom:summary type="text">I spent last week in NYC talking about mashups to a number of customers in the financial sector. I love going to NY, and last week the weather was beautiful and all the designer dogs were out in force in Central Park. The outlook from our financial institution clients wasn’t quite so perfect, however.Here’s the message I heard over and over again: Mashups in the financial industry were only good </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/04/mashups-in-financial-arent-just-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjJ6-xYj-nN_3hxfxRWJSyLtZRincEDpEY_5KlFTBI95HDMlpz4-OeHazrSrOjvnBwIHDaucjVWrSf8zr1XzuSxHprO-XDspfgONGi1u5jDeu15SyKA77j_Ra8V3Uv9coNZ-a8tUCtN-jY/s72-c/fidelity+djia+widget.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-9117059696708830456</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-04-04T14:43:01.502-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Web 2.0</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Millenials</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Security</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Smoking pot and stealing music. Some things never change.</title><atom:summary type="text">OK, I admit I wrote that title to see if I could trick some people into reading this post. But really, I will actually compare the two. My motivation is a recent article by Linda Tucci, a writer for SearchCIO.com. It made me smile because it was about how millennials don&#39;t respect organizational, hierarchical or other boundaries. These millennials are going to cause security headaches because </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/04/smoking-pot-and-stealing-music-some.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-3301678576565598548</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:43.077-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BPM</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mashup Governance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SOA Governance</category><title>Can I take back what I said about BPM and mashups?</title><atom:summary type="text">Back what seams a very long time ago, but was actually only October last year, I wrote a post suggesting that BPM was another form of business mashup. Like-minded blogger Sandy Kemsley agreed, and bemoaned the lack of mashup understanding in the BPM community.I&#39;ve kept an eye on the BPM community looking for activity around mashups. I&#39;ve seen a few comments around the edges, but nothing I would </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/04/can-i-take-back-what-i-said-about-bpm.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiJkaF1_iE5ncpThDG403mfaRLoH4C3JqZCtJ4Lhf7AEf9QBLi69tC7Ujul4nycMJzDmNv2Irb-2AA_4z_y6UeSFS3LfR3PWEhsSUjGpkP8vu1uVbSWEGM9yBNwR4lGEDw_n2mADZZyjK8/s72-c/TheLongTailWithNotes.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-8058058226908668947</guid><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:43.665-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dapper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Dapper has a lot of promise, but boy can it be annoying!</title><atom:summary type="text">I haven&#39;t done a review in a while, so I thought I&#39;d get back into it, starting with Dapper. I came across them in a Hinchcliffe blog entry about the most promising mashup tools. He had Dapper on the list, along with other more well-known tools such as JackBe, who still won&#39;t let me test their product.Dapper allows developers to pull content from websites and expose them using various APIs. There</atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/03/dapper-has-lot-of-promise-but-boy-can.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjKcDk-hsUka4ZMNZC2tHm6joNkg9uoGBgKdb8V3H0wHG7uPYfgfACwTELwcdf-nS1YKU7G2V-o3H7W1UcbLrb_IfmD_nwvT-AIku1w2mvTkE2yASK9eKswCPkQY0X-Inxhgo-R-FfL46Y/s72-c/dapper-logo-big.gif" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-2926316312580242926</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:44.263-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Carr</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">IT Alignment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Web 2.0</category><title>The reports of IT&#39;s death are greatly exagerated. Or are they?</title><atom:summary type="text">It’s been a while since I wrote in this blog. I’ve had a lot of things happen, so I hope you will all forgive me. First, Marketing decided they couldn’t afford a pet nerd any more, so I had to find another job. I can’t blame them. They’ve let me run wild for a year, reading and writing and playing with software. How many people get to do their dream job for even a year?Serena’s professional </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/03/reports-of-its-death-are-greatly.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhyYvP1TfQ867hX4N_udieeRhnXomLVBeyHxjBvo9TYAvoH1y0vCybz4m1dG-zvjr4GAczgmhOlxsyqDgcXNHlLd9PJtH5aNP6uFYoa13q6djg6VO3EyipHcg1ywPsM46eVILt98WWfzc0/s72-c/steno+pool.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-70117657596160370</guid><pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-07T09:30:57.326-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dion Hinchcliffe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">RSS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>IT run-around crowd can&#39;t bypass the need for &#39;real&#39; web services</title><atom:summary type="text">I just finished reading a post by Patty Seybold in her Outside Innovation blog. In this post she bemoans the looming mashup hype, but notes that it&#39;s about time mashups enter the mainstream.Too true. Seybold goes on to say that mashup vendors are trying to convince potential customers that they don&#39;t need IT. In Seybold&#39;s words, these vendors are saying, You don&#39;t have to wait for your IT </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/02/it-run-around-crowd-cant-bypass-need.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-1129153628590400264</guid><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-06T14:50:07.948-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Web 2.0</category><title>More 2008 predictions from the &#39;unnamed analyst&#39;</title><atom:summary type="text">Let me start out by congratulating Encanvas. They have joined JackBe in the illustrious group of mashup vendors who won’t let me review their mashup tools for this blog. Here’s what they had to say when I asked.As Serena is a close competitor to Encanvas I’m not sure that would be appropriate but we have the greatest admiration for any organization that is encouraging agile computing and it’s </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-2008-predictions-from-unnamed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-4223359034911401124</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-22T15:38:44.350-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">eWeek</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">George Carlin</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SOA Consumers</category><title>What would George Carlin say about the Ten Mistakes Companies Make When Implementing SOA?</title><atom:summary type="text">In Paul Callahan’s recent eWeek article he lists ten mistakes companies make when they implement SOA Projects. It’s a pretty good list, and I’ll summarize it here, but I’d like to do some tweaking.Do you remember George Carlin explaining how the Ten Commandments could be boiled down to two, with another added for good measure? If not go take a look. That’s what I think about this list. It isn’t </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/what-would-george-carlin-say-about-ten.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-2988531125066504757</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-16T18:53:04.601-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mashup Governance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SOA Governance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ZapThink</category><title>Linthicum on Mashup Governance...over the top?</title><atom:summary type="text">I usually agree with David Linthicum of ZapThink when he writes about SOA. He understands the problems faced by organizations moving to SOA-based applications development. He gets that organizations need to put governance in place to avoid SOA turning into merely A Bunch of Services. (ABOS) I&#39;m a fan.But I think his recent article on mashup governance in the SOA Institute newsletter was off the </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/linthicum-on-mashup-governanceover-top.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-5176230070189989805</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-15T12:58:24.927-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Guerrilla SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ZapThink</category><title>ZapThink Predictions for 2008</title><atom:summary type="text">Continuing in my series on the 2008 mashup predictions made by others, I&#39;d like to talk about a recent ZapThink article by Jason Bloomberg. He makes several predictions about the future of SOA in 2008, to include the sale of ZapThink itself. I won&#39;t comment on the acquisition discussion except to say that it seems a bit odd for ZapThink to tack up a For Sale sign like that. I can only guess they </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/zapthink-predictions-for-2008.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-9054183362684381484</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-12-10T05:44:44.624-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Portals</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Here&#39;s a man excited about mashups</title><atom:summary type="text"> You can tell just by looking at this guy how excited he is about mashups. Energy and excitement just rolls off his picture in waves.Really, Tim&#39;s a great guy, and spoke to India&#39;s Express Computer about business mashups. The gist is that organizations have too many portals and too many applications that suck up too much of IT&#39;s operating budget.The benefits of aggregation into a portal are lost </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/heres-man-excited-about-mashups.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiFqRJWU0j1NhA_E0OFemalfPsa_iAkrb6RRJpIVwZfCOg_K_t4Jzq-CgJxDq74DxIRpCEEC_PqktNeXkqu2gIRE_0lKMBIbQnjl-0AR52ea-KnKml5h0gwNKD9ik0H5Tp2-WcboHDnv44/s72-c/TimZoncaExcited.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-8358357240877789893</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-10T16:31:39.796-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mashup Governance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SOA Governance</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">WOA</category><title>Hinchcliffe and Chappell Predictions for 2008 Part 2 - Mashup Governance</title><atom:summary type="text">Welcome to Part 2 of my series on 2008 mashup predictions made by Dave Chappell and Dion Hinchcliffe. In Part 1 I discussed how both are predicting the end of Big SOA. If you are interested, read the original posts and circle back to my comments. If you aren’t interested in the death of Big SOA, but are interested in mashup governance, read on.Both Chappell and Hinchcliffe note that organizations</atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/hinchcliffe-and-chappell-predictions.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-2122368505022200343</guid><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-11T11:03:25.645-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Big SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dave Chappell</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dion Hinchcliffe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Guerrilla SOA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Hinchcliffe and Chappell Predictions for 2008 Part 1 - The Death of Big SOA</title><atom:summary type="text">It&#39;s that time of year again. Everyone is writing their predictions for 2008. Some are bullish, some bearish, some worth reading, some not. Of the myriad predictions out there, I like the ones written by Dave Chappell and Dion Hinchcliffe the best. I almost completely agree with everything they have to say. However because I don&#39;t completely agree, it gives me an excuse to write.I suggest you </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/hinchcliffes-2008-predictions.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-112840705603893181</guid><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-04T09:19:57.624-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">coopetition</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">frenemies</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">froes</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">John Donne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Mashup vendors need to work with our frenemies or the bell will be tolling for us</title><atom:summary type="text">I’ve had a nice long break over the holidays but now it’s time to roll up my sleeves, gird my loins and otherwise prepare to get back to work. And what better subject to start off the new year than turning enemies into friends, working with foes or partnering with competitors?Gwyneth Dwyer has posted on this very subject. Back in the 90s we called it co-opetition. The new terms are frenemies and </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2008/01/mashup-vendors-need-to-work-with-our.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-5771142820301963146</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-07T15:40:57.310-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SOBA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ZapThink</category><title>Bloomberg says mashups need governance as well as an easy development environment</title><atom:summary type="text">Jason Bloomberg, a ZapThink analyst, is planning to hold a session at SOAWorld 2008, where he will discuss the need for mashup governance when developing Service-oriented business applications. (SOBAs) I won&#39;t be at his session, or even at the conference, but I read what looks like his abstract in the press.Bloomberg&#39;s conclusion: mashups need governance, and here&#39;s why.Way back in the day, when </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/12/bloomberg-says-mashups-need-governance.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-571989163996672084</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-05T11:26:20.537-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BPM</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Dapper</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">data mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise 2.0</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise Web 2.0</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HIMS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">JackBe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">NExaWeb</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">presentation mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Mashup Composer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Web 2.0</category><title>Business Mashups already are process aware</title><atom:summary type="text">Today I read a post by ebiz blogger Keith Harrison-Broninski about Mashups and process. He took a look at mashups from two perspectives represented by mashup tool vendors JackBe and NexaWeb.(As an aside, do you think JackBe allowed him to evlauate their tool? Readers will remember that JackBe declined to let me evaluate Presto, as I&#39;ve noted here and here.)I&#39;m in the middle of evaluating Dapper, </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/12/business-mashups-already-are-process.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-6460810191810625490</guid><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-30T12:42:10.327-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashups</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Enterprise 2.0</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Web 2.0</category><title>What&#39;s true for blogs and wikis is true for mashups as well</title><atom:summary type="text">In a recent post, Harvard Business School professor Andrew McAfee discussed findings published earlier in Andy Dornan&#39;s Business Week article about the perceived value of Web 2.0 technologies within enterprises. I&#39;ve already commented on Dornan&#39;s article, and won&#39;t do so again, but I do want to comment on McAfee&#39;s insights relating to Business Week&#39;s findings.Those of you who have already read </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/11/whats-true-for-blogs-and-wikis-is-true.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-26860098590545897</guid><pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-30T07:54:17.703-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ActiveGrid</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Coghead</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">data mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Coghead lets you build simple web apps, not mashups</title><atom:summary type="text">A colleague of mine last week suggested that I review Coghead as a mashup assembly platform. I&#39;ve been spending the week with them and can conclude that they are neither a good nor a bad mashup platform. In fact, they aren&#39;t a mashup platform at all.Coghead allow its users to construct simple web applications based on a back-end database. Both the application and the database are hosted by </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/11/coghead-lets-you-build-simple-web-apps.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-3969668289007239571</guid><pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-16T14:44:53.598-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fake Steve Jobs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">JackBe</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Have fun with Mashup Composer, JackBe</title><atom:summary type="text">I&#39;m not one to hold a grudge. Hey, when JackBe said I couldn&#39;t download and try their software, I understood. I didn&#39;t like it, but I understood.But let&#39;s play fair here.Someone from JackBe has downloaded Serena Mashup Composer. If I were Fake Steve I might have a field day talking about how, now that they&#39;ve had a chance to dig into Composer, JackBe must be crying like a girl. If I were Fake </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/11/have-fun-with-mashup-composer-jackbe.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-665211066607667427.post-9110765085577078252</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-11-15T16:07:28.038-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ActiveGrid</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">business analyst</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Business mashup</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Intel Mash Maker</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Kapow</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">RoboMaker</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Serena Software</category><title>Who will be the business mashers?</title><atom:summary type="text">One of the top two leading industry analyst firms has been talking for several months about how software applications are brittle, difficult to maintain and aren&#39;t architected to keep up with the fast-paced demands of today&#39;s business environment. That&#39;s not new news. It isn&#39;t even old news. What is news is that now we have analysts saying out loud what we&#39;ve all known for quite a while: custom </atom:summary><link>http://businessmashup.blogspot.com/2007/11/who-will-be-business-mashers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Shaw)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>