Movies, Music and Soap

10th Anniversary: Up The Bracket

2012-10-06T08:55:00.000+01:00

Arguably one of the most influential and important indie bands of the early 2000s are The Libertines. The aftershocks of their 2002 debut album, Up The Bracket are still being felt, so much so that in 2010, the band reformed to play concerts at Reading and Leeds festivals to a new generation of music lovers. Leaving the band's troubled history and current up in the air status aside, it's hard to believe Up The Bracket was released 10 years ago. Today, British indie music could do with a pioneer to bring it out of the NME-based rut it has fallen into, but for now, let's forget that and cast our minds back to mid-2002...

Things have changed since then - Tony Blair was still Prime Minister, George Bush was the President, the Arctic Monkeys were still enduring secondary school and The Strokes were the only decent indie band out there. Guitar driven pop was, you could say, on a hiatus. Huge bands such as Muse, Foo Fighters and Coldplay dominated the music scene, but there wasn't much for someone who didn't want to listen to Dave Grohl's harsh vocals and fuzzy guitars, but wasn't quite pathetic enough to want to listen to Chris Martin whine into a microphone about his piano.

Then came The Libertines, a breath of fresh air into the British music scene. Of course, the NME practically adopted them, but not without good cause. Pete Doherty and Carl Barat's friendship (and later their very public falling out) and chaotic stage personas were as important as the music itself. Doherty's lyrics painted a strangely idealistic view of Great Britain, almost fondly revealing the cracks in society. 'Time For Heroes' mourns the loss of poetry and Englishness - "there are fewer more distressing sights than that of an English man in a baseball hat" - while 'Horrorshow' is a love poem to heroin, something that is close to the media's heart when depicting Pete Doherty.

However, the influence of the album cannot be denied. The band had dedicated fans and followers - and there was massive speculation that they would become the next Smiths. In some ways, they did. The lyrics on Up The Bracket almost rival Morrissey's offerings, and the band did not last as long as they were expected to, breaking up after only two albums. Looking at the British music scene just 2 or 3 years later, it was peppered with guitar based indie bands, offering their own take on the sound that the Libertines made so famous. Franz Ferdinand, The Futureheads, Kaiser Chiefs and Bloc Party suddenly found their sound had appeal and people wanted to listen to their music. Heck, even Graham Coxon was so inspired by The Libertines he actually covered 'Time For Heroes'!

Perhaps indie music nowadays is lacking its 'new sound' for the decade. The Smiths did it in the 80s, Blur in the 90s and The Libertines in the 2000s. British guitar music is crying out for a new figurehead and time is running out. Who will take up the mantle next...?

Weekly Poll 3: The Blog

2012-08-03T13:18:00.000+01:00

The Recyclable Youtube: The Christian Bale Rage

2012-07-30T12:17:00.001+01:00

We all remember it. The filming of Terminator: Salvation was halted when a technician walked onto the set just as Christian Bale was about to do some acting. That day, something was unleashed to the world: The Christian Bale Rant. Whoever was recording it suddenly found they had enormous power. It was leaked and soon Bale became the centre of the internet's attention. More specifically, Youtube.

The guys who acted the scene out are brilliant. Although this video is made even funnier by the amount of comments made by angry Youtubers asserting that is 'isn't real' and that it's 'a fake'. Yes, we rather think that's the point!

There are many remixes, so we've chosen just one - this is our favourite. Bale Out is a rather expletive driven number, so don't play this with small children or your boss in earshot.

The there was this. The Mae Shi (whoever they are) released this song. Not only does it include clips from the rant, but it also includes a reference to almost all of Bale's films. It's probably the most epic song ever written.

Poor Christian Bale.

The Recyclable Youtube: Recut Edition

2012-07-30T12:17:00.000+01:00

Weekly Poll 2: Buffy

2012-07-27T10:58:00.000+01:00

We love to know what our readers think. This week's poll is on whether or not you think there should be a Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie? So what will it be?!

Anatomy of a House Episode

2012-07-26T21:20:00.003+01:00

1. Someone collapses.
2. House thinks it's boring.
3. Something odd happens to the patient.
4. House takes on the case.
5. House calls his team idiots.
Meanwhile House is having a bet with Wilson about something.
6. House asks the team to perform a unethical test. Cuddy is outraged but he talks her round.
7. It doesn't prove what he thought it would.
Meanwhile, the team break into the patient's house looking for environmental factors.
8. House calls the team idiots.
9. The team suggest ideas.
10. House lets them test for some other diseases.
11. This doesn't work either.
12. The team decide to perform a treatment for something House says it isn't.
13. House talks to Wilson and has an epiphany.
14. House rushes in to stop the wrong medication/surgery and saves the day.
15. House wins the bet.
16. We think House might learn things from the patient but he doesn't.

The Recyclable Youtube: Mario

2012-07-25T08:28:00.000+01:00

Part of our recyclable Youtube series. I'm sure we all remember the good old days of Mario Bros. The two lovable Italian plumbers are still going today, and there's an awful lot of love for them on Youtube.

Firstly, there's the 'playing the music on weird musical instruments' group of individuals. This ranges from the remote control car and Tesla coils to the more standard instruments such as the violin guy, a capella guy and the double guitar. While not wildly creative, essentially they're just playing the main theme tune on their chosen instrument, they sure are entertaining. Thought has gone in to each one - the double guitar guy must be pretty talented and the remote control car must have taken ages to set up! We don't know much about giant Tesla coils here at Movies, Music and Soap, but we do know they cost a fortune, so the fact that these guys are playing the Mario theme on it is pretty hilarious, all things considered!

Then there's the arrangements. We're not going to focus on any of the dubstep remixes out there, because that's got its own post in the series, but there are some seriously good arrangements and remixes out there. Here are a few for your delight... The Fresh Prince of Bom-Omb Battlefield: while not strictly an arrangement or remix, it's a mashup which is kind of similar, right? Plus, we can't get enough of it. The Mario Elevator Music is also a must-listen! It's an easy listening of one of our favourite pieces of music from the Mario world. There are hundreds of remixes, but we're not convinced by most of them, but this sweet electro one did catch our attention Imagine how great life would be if elevators really did play this?! Lastly, we're going to leave you with a brilliant arrangement of The Smiths' This Charming Man, if it was included in a Mario game.

Finally, Mario Paint could practically be given its own post in this series, but there are some seriously amazing arrangements of music done on Mario Paint and uploaded to Youtube that we simply couldn't ignore it! Our favourite, by far has got to be the 16 minute long homage to the music from The Legend of Zelda, but then we're massive geeks! If you're anything like us, you'll find yourself occupied for the next hour or so, listening to all the Mario Paint songs.

Why We Love: Gold Panda

2012-07-23T13:56:00.000+01:00

For those indie kids who just want some dance music in their lives, this is one for you. Gold Panda is an amazing electronic outfit with all the dancability of popular dance music, but none of the annoying dubstep screamy drops that seem to plague all dance music today.

Gold Panda's debut full-length album, Lucky Shiner, blends electronic dance music with indie pop and folk, creating a completely unique sound. Despite including heavily produced, sample-tastic dance songs like 'You' and full on low-fi indie instrumentals like 'Parents' on one album, it works so well. This isn't an album you could put on at a party - the chill out factor of the non-dance songs is too high, but you're sure going to get a few cheers if you play some of the more dancey numbers to partygoers, clubbers and ravers alike.

The reason Gold Panda seems to work so well is down to complex layers - beats and samples are gradually built up to create some wonderful minimalist electronic music. Mixing acoustic guitars, synths, samples and a whole host of world instruments, Gold Panda is one of the most exciting musicians out there.

Gold Panda is playing a range of festivals this year, so if you happen to be attending one, we'd urge you to go and see - it's bound to bring a great party atmosphere to any serious music fan's festival experience! Movies Music and Soap will be heading to Bestival this year, so if you see us raving to Gold Panda, don't be surprised!

What's The Festival - 27th July
Stuck! Festival - 3rd August
Summer Sundae - 17th August
Outlook Festival - 30th August
FYF Fest - 1st September
Bestival - 6th September
Dimensions - 7th September

Rise!

2012-07-21T17:01:00.001+01:00

----------NO SPOILERS----------

Bringing his Batman trilogy to an end can't have been an easy thing for Christopher Nolan. Since Batman Begins, he's taken his audiences on a tour of fine film-making. His films are beautifully detailed, stunningly soundtracked, and they never assume the audience are idiots. It is rare that all three of these elements come together in blockbuster films - normally lack of cinematographic beauty is sacrificed for a impressive special effects. Or even worse, as in the case of James Cameron's blockbuster, Avatar, a fairly mundane plot stops the film developing into anything truly 'great', regardless of its state-of-the-art special effects. Nolan has never given up any elements of truly great cinema to make his summer blockbusters, and that's what we love about him. With stunning visual effects, legendary casts, twisting plots, and a seeming knack for incorporating massive scale scenes as well as much more personal dialogue, it's hard to contemplate just how expensive some of his films must have been. The Dark Knight Rises is no exception to the rule.

Picking up some years after The Dark Knight, Bruce Wayne is a broken man, a recluse living in just a small section of the newly rebuilt Wayne Manor. Physically battered and emotionally spent, he is unwilling to be Batman ever again. However, when a mysterious woman steals something precious, he finds the impetus to leave his home and search for it. Travelling back to Gotham, we find it nearly tearing at the seams and unbeknownst to the police force, an army is rising. Tom Hardy's Bane (who is sometimes a little difficult to understand in a loud, bassy cinema - perhaps our only criticism of the film) claims to be Gotham's reckoning, and he is certainly a physical match for Batman.

Just who is Bane and where has he come from? Well, given that the film has only been out two days, we're hardly going to spoil it for you, but to the relief of the audience, Bane's backstory is given - unlike the Joker in The Dark Knight. Perhaps the characters are supposed to be held in stark contrast - Bane is fighting for something and his acts in the film, unlike the Joker's, are not just a madman's random entertainment. In the last few years, it has become apparent that Tom Hardy is set for great things, but the character of Bane has given him even more credibility as an actor. Even if you've been living under a rock for a while, you've probably still seen a picture of Bane. The mask covers much of Hardy's face (to be fair, it could be anyone under there!), consequently, the expressions all come from his eyes. Again, without revealing too much, the emotions are all there, even if you can't see much of Bane's face.

Hardy is just one of many great actors involved (many return for a second or third Batman). We've become acquainted with Morgan Freeman's Fox, Michael Caine's Alfred (who, despite having a significantly smaller role, is possibly even more powerful than ever), Gary Oldman's Gordon and of course, Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne. No doubt Tom Hardy will be the one talked about, but this Batman film is perhaps the first that has given us a small picture of just how talented Bale is. Bruce Wayne, the man, not the superhero is given much more screen time, and his inner turmoil, not to mention a surprising display of emotion between Bale and Caine remind us that Christian Bale doesn't just look great with his shirt off.

Perhaps now isn't the best time to talk about reveals and plot twists, suffice to say, there are some. Perhaps you will guess the story to Joseph Gordon Levitt's character, John Blake, as we did, but we doubt anyone will guess the whole film. But it's all there, set up from practically the first scene. We were also impressed with how neatly the film ended - there were no loose ends or frustrating spinning-top-endings (see Inception) and this we commend Nolan for. We're left in no doubt that this is the final Batman film for Nolan and it does not disappoint.

This article probably hasn't even done the film justice, and maybe in two or three weeks when we're sure you've all seen it, we'll do a more in depth analysis of it, but until then, you'll just have to go out and see what all the fuss is about!

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Tumblr

2012-07-20T16:57:00.000+01:00

Movies, Music and Soap are now on Tumblr. Please feel free to follow us here. We're gradually adding all our old posts from this site over, so you can have them on your Tumblr dashboards too! We might even add some bonus posts to that page if we're feeling generous!

Weekly Poll: The Dark Knight Rises

2012-07-20T14:51:00.000+01:00

We're really interested in what our readers think. So we've started a new weekly poll. This week has, of course got to be about the most talked about film of the summer. Did you see it on its opening weekend?

The 4 Funniest Film Scenes (That Really Shouldn't Be Funny)

2012-06-29T22:04:00.001+01:00

We've all been there. You watch a film with a slightly more discerning eye and you find it hilarious. From shark films to The Notebook, we've all found laughs in the unlikeliest of places. Here are our five favourites:

1. The shark eats the helicopter - Jaws 2: So for some reason, the children decide it's a good idea to go out in their boats despite Papa Brody's strong warnings. It all ends in disaster and in short, they need to call the coastguard. Just when you think things are going to turn into a bloodbath, a helicopter arrives. It lands on the water and, well, it turns into a bloodbath. If the blood is wires and fuel. The shark grabs hold of the helicopter and pulls it underwater and eats it whole. OK maybe it doesn't eat it whole, but it gives it a good seeing to. Any suspense or terror you might have previously felt has just been wiped out. Don't go back in the water because a really unbelievable chain of events will take place and your helicopter will be mauled by a shark.

2. Samuel L. Jackson's motivating speech ends in a shark attack - Deep Blue Sea: There's a really fine line between a good shark film and a unintentionally funny shark film. Deep Blue Sea sees the line, and manipulates it as far as it possibly can that the audience is unsure if the film is unintentionally funny, or actually supposed to be funny. Things are looking bad for the scientists who genetically engineer sharks to be way too intelligent. Heck, they've already killed someone by locking them in an oven and turning it on. However, things reach a whole new level when Samuel L. Jackson, mid-motivating speech, gets a little too close to the edge. The next thing you know, a shark has jumped out of the water in a half decent impression of Free Willy (if Willy was a genetically engineered intelligent shark intent on eating Jesse), eating him whole. This happens either before or after a shark eats a man's torso and his legs fall to the bottom of the sea, still twitching like a headless chicken. We weren't about to re-watch the film to find out. Probably the whole film could be on the list, but this is our personal favourite. No. The whole film should be on the list.

3. Rachel McAdams remembers to take off all her jewelry - The Notebook: Consumed by her wild, unconditional passion for Ryan Gosling, she is simply unable to hold on to her prized virginity for any longer and the young couple proceed to remove their clothing before performing 'the act'. However, she takes it a step too far, removing her earrings and her necklace. Did she not learn anything from Titanic?!

4. The scary red monsters in the village turn out to be Adrien Brody - The Village: Really, the whole film is just hilarious, and gets even more hilarious when you watch it a second time, knowing what happens. OK so we lied a bit in the title, the Village are a group of people who live a very traditional life because the outside world is just too horrifying. They keep everyone in the Village by scaring them with evil red monsters that are truly terrifying to the villagers. To anyone in the audience over the age of 12, they are hilariously un-scary. Once we find out they're fake, you'd think that would be it, but no, one monster makes a final appearance, as if we're supposed to believe now, that they're real.. wait, what?! No, it's just Adrian Brody (who is actually surprisingly convincing as a man with severe learning difficulties). We would say this is a low point is M. Night Shymalan's career, but then we remembered only one of his films is actually worth watching, and that's only really worth seeing once.

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Movies Music and Soap are looking for...

2012-04-03T12:12:00.002+01:00

We are now on Twitter. Follow for the latest post updates and other opinions on film, tv, books, games and pop culture in under 160 characters. @MoviesMusicSoap is where you'll find us (click the link to take you through).

We are currently looking for writers. If you have read some of our posts and have ideas of your own that you think would fit in the style of the blog, then please drop us a line on Twitter and we'll request more details. We're open to anything in the music, film, tv and pop culture line, be it serious or funny. In most cases, we'd need a sample of your writing, and you'd need to have a good standard of written English, but hey, there's no harm in trying. We can't offer any form of payment for any articles you write, but we will credit you fully. We are also happy to take on regular writers - if you have a series of posts you'd like to do, or would like to do more than one article, then that can be arranged too.

Basically, we're kind of hiring.

On a different note, we love discovering new things here at Movies Music and Soap, so if you are in a band, or are a filmmaker, musician or any other kind of artist and you'd like us to review your work, please get in touch!

The Problem With Stuart Little

2012-04-03T10:51:00.002+01:00

We have always had a long-standing hate for the film Stuart Little. You may know exactly what we're talking about, or maybe you just thought it was a whole heap of family friendly film fun about a mouse who befriends some people. The film actually doesn't make any sense though:

Firstly, it's a talking mouse. OK so that's not a problem - it's a film and animals are always talking in films, so just suspend your disbelief for one second you cynical idiot. Yup, we did. But then we realised that the mouse can talk to the humans, and the cat. The cat can talk, but only to other cats or the mouse. How does this make any sense?! In the Wild Thornberries, it's just one girl who can talk to all animals. In Homeward Bound, the dogs and cats can talk to each other but not to humans. You get the picture. There needs to be consistency, and there is none in Stuart Little.
The mouse is in a children's home. Again, OK, this isn't a problem in itself, but the mouse is the only one in the children's home. All the other children are actual children. We refuse to believe that the mouse community of New York is caring for all but one of its children, or that there aren't more orphans. Being a mouse is a risky business, after all, as proven by the film. How did he end up in the normal children's home rather than a mouse children's home? How were the Littles even allowed to adopt him? Surely there's laws in place to prevent people adopting outside of their species unless it's classified as a pet?!
The little boy managed to make the car drivable for a mouse. It's a remote controlled car. No. Just no. This is all wrong, surely it's not possible to convert a remote controlled mini car into a car that is drivable for a mouse, even a mouse with an abnormally high IQ level.
Stuart is supposed to be the younger brother, yet he's voiced by Michal J. Fox who is most definitely a grown man, has a man's voice and has been a man for many years now. The little boy is played by Jonathan Lipnicki, who might be some sort of mental man-child now, but at the time, he was most definitely a little boy. Whenever we watch the film, this always confuses us!
The Little family live in a traditional-style house next to two skyscrapers. THIS WOULD NEVER HAPPEN. Stop with your crazy architecture and just do it normally.

So there you have it. Don't ever view Stuart Little with even an ounce of cynicism, or you'll turn out like us, bitter and twisted and unable to enjoy a family comedy about a family who adopts a mouse (a mouse!? For God's sake, he's not a child, he's a mouse, you can't just adopt him!!). These are just a few of the problems with Stuart Little. Don't even get us started on Hugh Laurie...

The Recyclable Youtube: Movie Songs

2012-03-29T14:36:00.001+01:00

Youtube is probably one of the most popular websites. People use it for all manner of things, but more often than not, it's to watch your favourite viral videos, sharing them with friends and discovering new ones. One of the reasons we love Youtube is for its users' talent for 'recycling' old films, tv shows and music, mashing them up and creating their own videos.

These amazing videos aren't purely original, and this series of posts is not about videos like 'Charlie Bit My Finger' or 'Ultimate Dog Tease' but rather, it celebrates the people who give whole new meaning to our favourite things.

Firstly, we'd like to introduce you to the world of Pogo. This guy basically takes your favourite films from the 1990s and early 2000s and makes them in to songs. But here's the catch. All of the sounds you hear are from the films themselves, he's cleverly added effects, pitch control and other editing to make some truly wonderful ambient pieces of music. If you haven't heard of him by now, you should really check his stuff out. Our personal favourites include (but are not limited to) 'Alohamora', 'Bloom' and 'Murmurs of Middle Earth'.

The thing that makes Pogo so interesting, is the sheer amount of work he must have put in creating the songs. Imagine trawling through one of the Lord of the Rings films, just looking for sounds you can use, and that's before you have to cut it together into something that sounds like music! Then the guy goes one step further by making a video for it, and syncs up the dialogue he uses (often just unintelligible clips) with the video. It's truly an art form.

The next people we're going to talk about are the people who make songs out of clips in films in a slightly different way. The two best examples are 'I've Got A Jar Of Dirt' and 'They're Taking The Hobbits To Isengard'. We reckon most people well-versed in memes will have seen both of these, but they're worth a mention! Videos like these are well done, but ultimately, just a bit of fun. Compared to Pogo, they're hardly going to be in our iTunes library (although I'm sure there are people who do download them!). It's not 'serious' music, but hey, it's good fun!

Is Music Getting More Political Again?

2012-03-29T14:33:00.000+01:00

In years gone by, it was normal, almost expected for musicians to have a political voice. Song has long been a method of getting one's point across and often this has been used for political reasons. This is a very brief history of some major political movements in relation to the music they inspired.

In the 1960s we had great social change - youth culture was blossoming, railing against parents who had grown up in a completely different era, perhaps in the interwar years or during the Second World War, accustomed to a climate of austerity and duty. America was now sending its children to die in a war, claiming to fight for democracy, while on its own soil, there were still deep-set racial democratic issues. It's almost poetic, that the line between good and evil, so clear during the Second World War, was becoming blurred. Bob Dylan sang The Times They Are A-Changin', a song about racism and social change, begging Congressmen to listen, and telling parents that their children were out of their control. Looking back on it as a young person today, the 1960s seem like a brilliant time for really meaningful music. Neil Young's Southern Man, The Beatles' Revolution and Cat Stevens' Peace Train are all examples of some of my personal favourites from the decade.

In the 1980s, both the U.S.A. and U.K. were dealing with some of the most notorious right wing governments in living memory. On the world stage, South Africa was beginning to experience political pressure, exerted by other countries due to its policy of apartheid. At home, there was financial instability, brought about by free market policies and debt culture. In Britain, Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister, who spent much time closing down mines and putting much of northern England out of work in the process. Unemployment was reaching record levels. Once again, the music scene had something to say about this. Gone were the days of gentle folk music, hippies smoking weed and holding hands, chanting for change. Music had changed. The punk scene had been and to some extents, gone, but it had left its mark on the music scene and gradually the discomfort about the state of affairs grew, boiling over into music, and even film.

Morrissey woefully sang "the kind people have a wonderful dream, Margaret on the guillotine". Although the song Margaret on the Guillotine is softly played and sang, it's lyrics hiss with venom and contain a violence that can only have been influenced by the anger of the punk scene. The Clash sang about the Brixton Riots in no uncertain terms, singing of how the police were too heavy handed when dealing with the rioters. Music left little doubt what it was talking about in the 1980s. There was no dressing it up, the songwriters cut straight to the point in their messages.

A song that is often overlooked it Peter Gabriel's Biko. This song is about apartheid in South Africa; more specifically it us about the murder, at the hands of the Secret Police, of Steven Biko, a black activist, peacefully protesting for change. The song's final lyrics are "the eyes of the world are watching you now", Gabriel, like other artists wasn't about to use pretty metaphors or obscure lyrics, disguising his views; he just put them out there for all to see. Obviously, this is just one example of a pretty hot topic from the 1980s, but it's one that always stuck out in my mind. On a slightly different note, if this is something you do not know much about, I would strongly recommend watching Richard Attenborough's Cry Freedom. It's based on the true story of journalist Donald Woods and his friendship with Steven Biko. It was made during apartheid and it one of the (many, many, many) reasons it was brought to attention as a global issue. You never know, you might learn something!

Then in the 1990s, something happened in the UK. Labour won a landslide majority and suddenly it was as if there was nothing for people to sing about. Everyone knew that the Conservatives were the bad guys. Billy Bragg had spent the whole of the 1980s convincing people to vote Labour, as did celebrities more recently such as Noel Gallagher, but what now? Labour was in power and musicians had nothing to sing for. What was the alternative? An idealistic socialist or communist state which was never going to happen? The Conservatives that many musicians had grown up writing scathing songs about? Or maybe some sort of anarchy? Musicians didn't know anymore.

What happened in music between 1997 and 2010 did not truly mean anything. Bands like Radiohead and Muse decided to go off and make vaguely political references in some of their work, but Muse mostly stuck to viewing the world through what we like to refer to as the Orwellspecs. By writing songs as if they were in a George Orwell book, and that the government is secretly spying on everything we do, Muse were able to do something vaguely political without any real substance. Nowhere in their lyrics did they mention specifics, instead, "they" is used. Who or what is "they"? The establishment? The government? The Illuminati?! Who knows, but it worked and we loved reading in to it. Radiohead took this view with OK Computer (this lucky reader once read an entire article on how OK Computer is just one big reference to Nineteen Eighty Four by, you guessed it, George Orwell). In 2003, Radiohead did seem to make an explicit reference to a certain event - they named their 6th studio album Hail To The Thief, which many believed to be a reference to George W. Bush's victory in the 2000 American Presidential Election. Thom Yorke then spent the next year or so trying to make the title sound a whole lot more pretentious than it really was, because he didn't want to 'state the obvious'. It was almost as if musicians didn't want to address issues that bothered them anymore.

Bands like Franz Ferdinand and Bloc Party opted to stay away from overtly political messages on their first albums - they just wanted to make people dance. One of the biggest bands of the last decade, the Arctic Monkeys stay far away from making broad political statements, preferring observational remarks about everyday life. Even Frank Turner, who seems to have roots firmly planted in folk, folk-punk and protest music doesn't want to be labelled as such, and many of his songs just seem to document the tales of him and his friends feeling disillusioned with life, rather than with the politics of today. Arguably the closest thing to an accurate political observation was when Kaiser Chiefs sang I Predict A Riot and were only about 6 years off with their predictions...

Currently, the coalition government have been in power for almost 2 years. There is so much artists can write about with regard to this. Firstly, there's a Conservative as Prime Minister, secondly, the Liberal Democrats joined them in government. Thirdly, the Liberal Democrats went back on their promise to cut tuition fees for university and instead voted to triple them. Basically, quite a lot. Plus, there's a pretty bad financial crisis going on, there's really high unemployment and we still have troops in Afghanistan. So where'a all the political music?! I hear you cry that Rage Against the Machine got Christmas number 1 not too long ago with their overtly political Killing in the Name, but that was the public rebelling against the manufactured television competition pop of the X Factor, not a genuine political movement - besides, the song is over 10 years old and refers to mainly American issues. So where are the British political musicians we used to pride ourselves on? We were so wrapped up in the awful state of the music industry that somewhere along the way, we forgot how bad other things have got in recent years.

Every now and then, the NME rears its ugly head, writing an article or two about politics, Love Music Hate Racism or how awful David Cameron being from Eton is. It's not like it used to be. In the riots in the UK last summer, countless teenagers claimed they were 'getting their taxes back' and that they were 'showing the government what it was about'. Even riots have lost their political edge, people were just filming it on their Blackberries, getting a cool pair or trainers and putting up a Facebook status about it. There was no heart and soul to it anymore, just like music. Artists don't seem to know how to complain about stuff anymore, or write a hard hitting song. As much as a tune Take Me Out is, I hardly think Franz Ferdinand will be remembered for their impact on society the way that people like Bob Dylan or the Beatles will be.

Is popular music in the UK getting more political again? That's one big fat 'no' from where we sit.

Why We Love: Last.fm

2012-03-28T16:41:00.000+01:00

My general philosophy on music is that someone is not a music fan unless they have a last.fm account to prove it. If you haven't heard of last.fm and you are a music fan, then where have you been your whole life?!

Last.fm isn't just a website, it's a lifestyle choice. I have had my account since May 2006 and it is a beautiful thing. It's just such an interesting way to look at your music taste. Hopefully by now most people at least know roughly what Last.fm is so when I'm explaining it is isn't a completely alien concept.

Basically, I don't know much about the technicalities of it, but you sign up for a free account and download something which you then have to switch on in your iTunes (it is available for other music players too). This is where the magic begins. It basically uploads all the music you listen to on your computer (you can even use it with online streaming programs like Spotify) and builds you charts based on which artists, songs and albums you listen to most often.

You can add your friends, and then see what you listen to. You can search for your favourite artists, read their biographies, look at photos, see when their next concerts are coming up. You can see which of your friends listens to an artist the most. You can join groups, chat in forums, update your profile and send messages to friends. You can send and receive recommendations to friends, and the site will build up its own recommendations for you based on what you listen to. You can even see what the charts for the whole of the web community are.

In short, last.fm is a great way to discover new music, listen to music and get really anal about which bands you listen to. If you become addicted and obsessed like I am, then you'll start deliberately listening to artists that you want higher up on your charts. It's a brilliant and unique way to genuinely see which bands are your favourites, and I have discovered my fair share of music through it. I will never delete songs from my Last.fm, and it gives a near - complete listening history for the last 6 years for me. On top of this, it is compatible with iPods and iPhones (and other devices), so your charts really can be super-accurate!

If you're an artist, it also presents opportunities that few take full advantage of. You can upload pictures, your own music (and set songs to just be a sample, be played on Last.fm's random radio or be free to download). It gives you an idea of how popular your music is, listing how many plays there have been overall, by how many users, and, of course, makes charts so you can see which is your most popular song. On top of this, you can create events, so when you're playing live, people can find out about it and state their attendance.

Last.fm provides opportunities for music fans and musicians alike, and more people should definitely get into it and stay into it!

Twitter

2012-03-27T13:53:00.003+01:00

We are now on Twitter. Follow for the latest post updates and other opinions on film, tv, books, games and pop culture in under 160 characters.

@MoviesMusicSoap is where you'll find us (click the link to take you through).

If you have any requests on what you'd like to see more (or less) of, then please, drop us a line on Twitter. If you would like to write and article, either as a regular or as a guest or one off, then please get in touch and we can discuss it further.

We love discovering new things here at Movies Music and Soap, so if you are in a band, or are a filmmaker, musician or any other kind of artist and you'd like us to review your work, please get in touch!

Films We Love That Make Us Really Angry

2012-03-22T15:36:00.002+00:00

Here at Movies, Music and Soap, we're suckers for a good old fashioned romantic comedy, preferably of the variety where Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan fall in love but don't actually meet until the end of the film. You all know what we're on about. But sometimes you watch certain romantic comedies and they just make you really angry. On the surface, it's all charming, sweetness and 'lovey dovey', but if you watch it with more cynicism, you realise how horrible and offensive some of these films really are.

You've Got Mail is the first culprit. We absolutely love this film, even though it seems light-years out of date (it was made in 1998), and should probably be remade as 'You've Got A Wall Post'. Ignoring the obvious advances in the Internet since the film was released, it's pretty cute. A boy and a girl hate each other, but they're having an anonymous 'relationship' online without knowing it. By the end of the film, they meet and realise that is doesn't matter that they hate each other, because they actually love each other. It's a classic romantic-comedy storyline, we've seen it time and time before and we love it.

Or do we? The long and the short of You've Got Mail is that Tom Hanks' character is the biggest wanker on the planet. There are so many reasons why any self-respecting Meg Ryan character should run a mile from Joe Fox, but she just doesn't seem to be able to see them. Firstly, he arranges to meet her, then hangs around outside the restaurant, getting his friend to check if she's hot. If eying her up like a piece of meat isn't enough, he then decides to stand her up, but go in as if he isn't the guy from the internet and torment her. Then his big discount book store puts her little book shop out of business in what is probably one of the saddest movie moment ever. Then he spends the next few weeks going round her house and starting to befriend her. This is where Meg Ryan is a total idiot and doesn't just slam the door in his face as most people would, but she starts going shopping with him. He's known for months that she's the girl he's chatting to online, but continues to act innocent. He then basically butters her up, making her wish that the man she was talking to online was him, and then right at the end of the film, he reveals it's actually him.

If their relationship lasted longer than the kiss in the ending scene, we'd be genuinely quite surprised. Once the cameras pan up into the sky, she should be asking him a lot of questions. Not only is it creepy, but it's horribly deceitful, plus she hates him with a passion. He's a dick. We should hate him. But of course, if watching the film in the right mood, it's adorable.

Groundhog Day is the next culprit. Bill Murray is a grade a wanker in this film and not for the reasons you'd expect. Yes, his character is supposed to be a bit of a dickhead, and the moral of the story is that he learns to be a nicer guy, but that doesn't excuse some of his behaviour. He basically sets up his whole life to helping him get the girl. Basically, she's not attracted to him at all, and they're clearly not right for each other. However, he decides to butter her up in a manner not dissimilar to Tom Hanks in You've Got Mail.

Bill Murray's character basically makes a list of all the things Andie MacDowell does and doesn't like and then pretends to be exactly the same. I'm sure we've all done that to an extent... pretended to like a film or a song to impress someone, but seriously, he does this in an almost sociopathic way. But it's ok, because it's just some sort of fucked up dream world, so he can just get the girl and tomorrow she won't even remember, because tomorrow is just today, but erased. So making lists of what she drinks, toasts to and what her favourite ice cream flavour is, is totally excusable, right?

No it isn't! The films ends with Bill Murray getting the girl and keeping her. How long is that relationship going to last?! "Oh, by the way, I don't actually like any of the same thing as you do, I was just doing it because I fancied you, but there isn't any substantial attraction here. I didn't actually think we'd wake up tomorrow and it'd be tomorrow. So, I guess we'll just leave it at that then." How stupid are the women in these films?! Whatever went on in Groundhog Day, Bill Murray certainly didn't fall in love, he just wanted to get laid.

Titanic: Where to begin?! Firstly, Kate Winslet needs to get over herself. She's living the life of royalty and she wants to kill herself over it!? What did Leo ever see in her?!

Seriously though, Rose is quite clearly a bitch, and you can blame James Cameron's poor camerawork for this. When they're floating on the wooden door-thing after the Titanic has gone down, you think there's not enough room for Jack on it, so he does the manly thing and floats in the freezing water while Rose lies on top of it. Fair enough, in 1912, that's probably what most men would have done, you don't really think twice about Jack's gesture. Until James Cameron does a nice shot from above and you see just how much room there is on the door. Why doesn't Rose say something? This is the first man she's ever loved and she's just letting him freeze to death because she's too god damn lazy to tell him there's probably room next to her if they do a bit of shifting round. What a bitch.

Also as if that wasn't enough insult. The message in the film is all about how much they love each other, no matter what, and how they'll "never let go" of their love. So Jack dies, and Rose goes on to marry, have lots of children, grandchildren and we're led to assume, great-grandchildren, and she never once mentions Jack to anyone until she sees the drawing of her on television and gets flown out to tell her story. A great tribute to your love for Jack, there, Rose. Cold-hearted bitch.

Every Jane Austen Adaptation Ever: OK this is purely for comic effect, but seriously, we need more strong female characters, rather than recycling the same pathetic morons from times gone by. In (the film version of) Sense and Sensibility, Marianne Dashwood is the most pathetic female character in the history of female characters. Bell Swan her more about her. First off, she falls over and sprains her ankle but luckily she's saved and carried home by the seemingly dashing John Willoughby. She makes him carry her home for a sprained ankle?! What?! Is she even serious!? I've known people break their ankle and not even go to the doctor about it for days. Man the fuck up Marianne!

Just when you think she's pretty robust and healthy again, Willoughby basically dumps her and she gets ill from this. Then she goes out walking to gaze upon Willoughby's house, but it's raining, so naturally, she falls ill to the point where she's about to die. We've all definitely been out in the rain before without a raincoat on and didn't nearly die because of it! People in these times were supposed to be more hardy, but she's just a pathetic human being.

Then there's (the BBC adaptation of) Persuasion. Louisa it a total idiot and jumps off the Cobb and Lyme Regis in the hope that the man she fancies will catch her. He doesn't and she gets sick. Ok she does actually get a head injury or something, so that's pretty serious. But who jumps off anything just expecting someone's going to catch you? It's ridiculous.

Anyway, there we go, some films that we absolutely love, but can't stand when watching them with a critical eye. There are others... don't even get us started on all the problems with Stuart Little, for example... actually, that might be one for the ideas board.

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Tim Burton's Films and the Church

2012-03-13T13:27:00.001+00:00

It's kind of strange that no one seems to have written anything about this before (although we doubt this is an original piece of writing - try Googling it). This humble writer used to be a huge Tim Burton fan when I was about 15, he probably got me into paying attention to directors and film in general. I have to admit, I have found his last few films pretty displeasing, but I'll always have a soft spot for him. The point of this post is to look at his portrayal of religion in his films as a one-dimensional embodiment of all that is bad about the world.

Edward Scissorhands is the first film that springs to mind. If it wasn't for the religious fanatic (Esmerelda?) then basically none of the bad stuff in the film would have happened. She warns all the women that there's something wrong with Edward, and the next thing is they're all organising a lynch mob to try and stop him. None of the other characters in the film mention religion, she is the only one who is portrayed as a religious person, and she is the only person who is unwelcoming towards Edward (at first, anyway). Religion in the film is basically portrayed as a cult, intolerant and closed-minded. A particular theme running through Tim Burton's portrayal of religion is that the religious characters often see the worst in things that are different, assuming they are demons or from hell, such as Edward, or as we shall see, the dead in Corpse Bride.

In Coprse Bride, religion is also not given a good name. The priest in the film the Pastor (Galswells) is not a nice character. He tricks Victoria into believing he will help her find out about Victor's marriage to the Corpse Bride, Emily, but only hands her over to her horrid family who locks her away to marry the murderer. He also tries to prevent the dead from entering the church, despite the fact that all the villagers realise that they are not evil or from hell, they are just their loved ones. Once again, the church is portrayed as intolerant and close minded, not to mention the fact that the Pastor is definitely quite sinister - Burton's casting of Christopher Lee (a horror movie veteran) as Pastor Galswells confirms this intention.

Sleepy Hollow presents a much more disturbing view of the Church. Set in flashbacks, the character of Ichabod Crane's past is examined. His mother is shown as a loving, spirited woman, but she is clearly a pagan, or some sort of 'child of nature'. She dances in the trees and puts flowers on the fire - presumably for 'magic' purposes. The Young Ichabod is not damaged by her, in fact, it's all innocent fun. Until his crazily religious father turns up, chastising the mother for her lifestyle, in once scene actually using a Bible. The father is shown to be an intimidating man, who Ichabod is afraid of. It culminates with Ichabod discovering the body of his mother in an iron maidan (torture device) in a Church. Yup, that's right, a Church. What more could you want?

Did Tim Burton have some sort of horrifying experience of the Church, or religion, or does he just not like it? Are his films trying to preach something? Who knows, but it's become a bit of a habit...

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Why We Love: Midnight in Paris

2012-03-08T01:46:00.000+00:00

Midnight in Paris is a pretty standard Woody Allen film but it was set in Paris, with fantasy, and Owen Wilson was playing Woody Allen. This might not sound like a great combination to you, but we were hooked. Owen Wilson's contributions to indie comedies are much more enjoyable than his roles in frat-pack films such as You, Me and Dupree or blockbusters like Meet The Parents (although we always have a soft spot for Zoolander. Who doesn't though, really?!). His work with Wes Anderson in particular made many reassess their opinion of him

Firstly, Owen Wilson is a superb Woody Allen. From the way he walks, talks and even some of the looks, you can tell he's really spent his time studying the classic Woody Allen stock character. Secondly, he's almost slightly more believable than Woody Allen ever was in his roles. It's always slightly mystifying at the end of the film when somehow, he normally ends up with the girl. Or having affairs left right an center. Owen Wilson is not a short, bespectacled dweeb and he's believably good-looking enough to have the pick of the three girls in the film.

Rachel McAdams plays the dismissive fiancee wonderfully. Her character and her family say they are open minded, but ultimately, they are not prepared to accept that Paris isn't in the USA. In an almost flashback to Annie Hall, an irritating friend, Paul Bates seems to know everything about all the places the couples visit, and Wilson's portrayal of Pender's annoyance at this shines though, you are almost expecting him to say "Well, that's funny, because I happen to have XXX right here..."

Now for the story. A young betrothed couple (Wilson and Rachel McAdams) are staying Paris, and struggling with writer's block, Gil Pender (Wilson) goes on nightly strolls around the city, which he always finds beautiful at night. When the clocks strike midnight, he is transported back in time to the roaring 1920s, spending his nights with authors such as Hemmingway and F. Scott Fitzgerald and artists such as Picasso, Matisse and Dali (captured brilliantly in a small cameo by Adrian Brody). Pender is in awe, believing the 1920s to be a 'golden era' for, well, just about everything. Falling in love with the slightly mysterious Adrianna, he starts to wonder about his imminent marriage and life in 2011.

The film's ultimate message seems to be that everyone looks to the past as a golden era, without realising they may well be living in one right now. It once again proves that Woody Allen can still make amazing films!

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Joseph Kony mk II (-write to your MP, don't share a video)

2012-03-07T11:29:00.003+00:00

So I got all annoyed about this whole Invisible Children thing. Basically, how can you achieve change through liking a status and/or sharing a video? If you want to influence the government and your Facebook privacy settings are anything like mine, they're not even going to be able to see that I've shared the video/liked the Facebook page/pledged my support anyway. So I drafted some letters you could write to your MP and possibly even a Lord, to show you feel strongly on the issue. I've already advised against donating money to Invisible Children until things become a bit more transparent with regards to their finances, so this is something to do in the interim if you feel strongly. Or you could always donate some money to Save the Children...

If you would like to copy and paste it (make sure you change the name of the MP and the name of the constituency/area you live in) then please do! If you don't know who your MP is, or how to contact them, here is a good place to start (or try Googleing them; most MPs have websites these days). As if doing good for the world wasn't enticing enough, if you write the a letter, they send one back on really posh paper! Or maybe you want to write to your MP on a totally other issue. Well now you know how. Remember, they have thousands of letters to read and reply to every day, so it might take a while before you get a response. Try not to be mean or aggressive, even if they're not from the party you support - you want to get them on side!

"Dear Mr/Mrs -------

I am writing to you today to express my deep concern about events that have been happening in Uganda for the last 26 years. After watching the viral video by ‘Invisible Children’, ‘Kony 2012’, I was stunned that such atrocities can go on behind the world’s back. If a government was snatching children in this country, forcing them to kill, maim and mutilate our citizens, not only would the rest of the world condemn us, but every single news channel would be reporting it.

Unless you have not got an Internet connection, I trust that you have seen the video by now. If not, it is easily accessible by Google, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube, and you should probably watch it now, before you read any further. The video may seem idealistic and very American, but the sentiment is true. Invisible Children may not be the most reputable of charities, but their work bringing this to light has to be commended and their main aim: to bring about the arrest of Joseph Kony has my full support. Not just the British Government, but the whole of Parliament should be endorsing the arrest and removal from power of Joseph Kony. While I am stunned this is not already on the lips of every single person in Britain, it is not too late to change this.

I urge you to put your full support to and to encourage your fellow MPs, not to mention Lords, interns, researchers, security guards, cleaners and canteen staff be they Labour, Liberal Democrat or Conservative to do the same. It is you who can make a difference on the world stage. Please, pledge your support to the cause and use the influence you have to raise the issue in the Government, and spread awareness to your constituents in ------.

Yours sincerely,

---------"

It's hardly going to win any awards for the Best Letter Written Ever in the Whole Entire World competition, but I think it does the job. If you want to write your own letter, remember to include:

Your name and address
An outline of the Kony issue
Mention of the video
The fact that you want the government to do something about it
If you support the Invisible Children, feel free to mention that too

I then used writetothem to send a message to a Lord. You can use the search engine to write to a Lord who already knows about the issue - type in 'Kony' in the top box. Or maybe you want to raise awareness of the issue to a Lord who hasn't already spoken about the issue.

"Dear Lord ---,

It was with disgust that I viewed a viral video made by 'Invisible Children' about Joseph Kony. I had previously not been aware of the state off affairs in Uganda and was shocked that this has not been in the news every day for the last 26 years. Invisible Children may not be the most reputable of charities, but their work bringing this to light has to be commended and their main aim: to bring about the arrest of Joseph Kony has my full support. I have written to my MP, urging him to use his influence to raise awareness and support for the arrest of this dreadful man. I wished to write to a Lord as well, and through the topic search engine on 'writetothem' I found that you have spoken about Kony before in the Lords.

I urge you to readdress the issue, particularly as now is a time when knowledge of Kony's hideous crimes is becoming prevalent. Thousands upon thousands of people are viewing this video and speaking out against Kony, but the people of Britain are powerless unless those in power sit up and listen to what we are saying. Enough is enough and more needs to be done, by Britain and the world to stop him.

Yours sincerely,

----- "

Who is Joseph Kony and just who are Invisible Children?

2012-03-07T10:35:00.000+00:00

No doubt if you're into social media, you will have heard of 'Kony' or 'Invisible Children' over the last few weeks, days and hours. It's the new viral thing. But with a change. This isn't a video of a kid biting his little brother's finger to make you laugh. This is a video claiming to be an experiment, to see what social media can do. So here it is. Watch it and make up your own mind:

If anything it is inspirational! The only thing I would say is that for a 'worldwide' video, it sure is aimed mostly at the USA! Anyway, share it, talk about it, sign the pledge, do what you want in reaction to it. After you have read all the facts. But remember, this is only one of the terrible things going on in the world today, perhaps we need to focus on more than one issue at a time. Spreading awareness of something this awful can't be a bad thing, surely, and together perhaps something can be done about it. However, I am not going to endorse buying anything from the Invisible Children's website and I am going to try and explain why.

Some people are claiming that Kony is no longer at large (see the WordPress article). That he has moved into other parts of Africa and his atrocities committed in Uganda have largely blown over. So what? He committed the crime, and one of the number one points that Invisible Children are campaigning for is to have him arrested. This is surely not a bad thing, even if it has blown over. He has turned young girls in to sex slaves, allowed the rape of hundreds of women and stolen young boys away from their families, turning them in to child soldiers. Therefore, regardless of whether or not this has all blown over, surely it is important to bring this man to justice. Remember the Nazis? Well, long after the war ended there were all sorts of organisations trying to find Nazi's who had committed horrifying acts and bring them to justice and had fled (many to South America) following the war. Why should this be any different?

As I've already stressed, Joseph Kony is only one person in the world committing atrocities, there are many more who should also be stopped and/or brought to justice, but this is a start. The important thing is, it's got people thinking about more than last night's episode of Eastenders. It's inspiring enough to watch the video, and then to see it shared all over your Facebook news feed, by people who have never previously shown any interest in what's going on in the world outside their country. I think this in itself is brilliant. I hope that at least some of those people continue to stay interested and this isn't a one off thing. If somehow a campaign like this can help this awful man be brought to justice, then in some ways, whether or not he has left Uganda or the issue has 'blown over' is a little bit irrelevant. OK, if the world had sat up and taken notice in 2004 or 2005, it may have been dealt with quicker, and less children would have been affected, but at least something is being done now. After all, short of having a time machine, we can't go back and change things.

Now for the real bad bit. I have linked to a reddit post at the bottom of this article. This claims (along with the Visible Children tumblr - really worth a read) that Invisible Children hardly spend any of the money that they receive in donations on actually helping their own cause. Most of it goes on 'expenses'. The figure quoted is 32% of their income going on direct services. Many charities have between 80% and 90% going on direct services. This is obviously worrying. I can't verify this, but there's more than one person saying it, in fact, there's quite a lot, and they're starting to shout it. Obviously, make up your own mind. I've shared the video on all my social media platforms; I find it inspirational. I will not, however, be supporting Invisible Children; just their cause.

On balance, Joseph Kony is a man who I would like to see the back of, but I don't think Invisible Children are the ones we should be throwing money at to make it happen. If anyone knows of any charities that spend their money more appropriately, then please link me to them and I will include them in here for those who still want to donate something.

If you want to help, write to your MP or a Lord (or if you're from outside the UK, whoever represents you). Get involved that way, but I would urge people to keep hold of their money until things become a little more transparent. Remember, sitting through a 30 minute video on a subject does not make you the expert. Charities do have motivations and it is important to read up on the facts before getting swept away. I shared the video on facebook, and also shared some articles to the contrary. The sentiment of the video - bringing about change through mass awareness, protest and pressure on governments is fine, but donating to certain charities doesn't always do the good you think it is going to do. It's sad, but it's the truth.

If you've read this and feel truly disheartened, I'm sorry. The video is inspirational, and hopefully some people have sat up and taken notice of an issue on the global stage which normally wouldn't interest them at all. Campaigning for something you truly believe in is brilliant, but always make sure you do your research.

Here are some links to counter articles to add some balance (I have referred to these):
http://ilto.wordpress.com/2006/11/02/the-visible-problem-with-invisible-children/
http://visiblechildren.tumblr.com/post/18890947431/we-got-trouble
http://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/qk0pd/kony_2012_help_raise_awareness_and_stop_joseph/c3ycvhb

For those of you who are too lazy to read this, my basic sentiment is: Sure, go and spread the word and the video, but please please please don't donate to Invisible Children!

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Open Letter To Sky Movies (Oscars 2012: Episode III: Revenge of the John Williams Fans)

2012-02-27T17:26:00.001+00:00

Dear Sky Movies,

I settled down at 11.30pm on Sunday 26th February 2012 for a 5 hour viewing of your Oscars coverage. I was excited. This is arguably the most important day of the calendar year for the film, fashion and television industry. I expected laughter, tears, frustration, joy (with regards to the awards) and Billy Crystal doing something incredibly American and cheesy. No doubt the speeches, dresses and spectacle would be talked about for weeks to come.

At 11.30 your 'Red Carpet' coverage began. I enjoy watching the stars arrive and I thought what better way to do it than with Sky Movies, a package that I would be lost without. They know what they're talking about, don't they? They always seem to be showing films that I enjoy and want to see, they must have some sort of amazing coverage planned. So you can imagine my surprise when Alex Zane, Nick Moran, Natalia Tena and a film critic from Heat Magazine (Heat Magazine have a film critic?) were broadcasting from a studio. If I had wanted to hear a bunch of people chatting about the films nominated, I would have started a conversation about the Oscars with my friends. I don't think one meaningful insight into films was made, yet the 'panel' were discussing how 'totally awesome' The Artist was as if they were wisened scholars.

Nick Moran. Who is Nick Moran? Has he ever been nominated for an Oscar? Who is he? Seriously, can someone please tell me. Alex Zane set himself up for a fail by introducing him as "the guy who terrorised Harry Potter and has recently turned his hand to directing". The guy I thought terrorised Harry Potter and has recently turned his hand to directing was Ralph Fiennes, and for a moment I was pretty impressed that Sky Movies had managed to get someone so famous on their show. But no. I'm not saying that people shouldn't be entitled to their views, but he was about as contrary as he could possibly be. He simply had to express the view that is not held by the masses. Fair enough if he's not into mainstream films, but that is essentially what the Oscars are about, is it not? I don't recall an award for best independent picture.

I think this Nick Moran (whoever he is) probably received a hard enough time on Twitter for his horrifying remarks about John Williams, one of the most famous and well-loved film composers of all time, but it really was out of line. Just in case he was wondering, I can sing Schindler's List and then Harry Potter with no trouble whatsoever. His soundtracks might have a very distinctive sound, but they don't all sound the same by a long way, and he's written some brilliant music for fantasy, sci-fi, war, dramas and comedies. Just because he always uses a full traditional orchestra it really doesn't make him boring. Fair enough he's rather mainstream, and probably filthy rich, but he's had 47 Oscar nominations... he's not exactly lazy is he? If his soundtracks really do all sound the same, I'm pretty sure someone at the Academy would have thought 'hang on, this soundtrack to War Horse is the spit of the Jaws soundtrack, he's clearly self-plagarising' and not nominated him.

(Totally on a rant here, but: besides, there's brilliant composers that self-plagarise way more than Williams - Hans Zimmer literally lifted a whole part of the Pirates of the Caribbean soundtrack from his Gladiator score, and his Batman Scores are definitely from the same family as his Dan Brown scores (Da Vinci Code etc). Composers recycle ideas, get over it. It's better for a composer to use his own idea again and again than to use someone else's again and again. Film music works because the audience are comfortable with a set of rules that most mainstream film music sticks to - they know how to read the music - John Williams is brilliant at this, why should he change just because Nick Moran wants something different. No thank you.)

In fact, I'd go so far as to say I'd advocate censoring Nick Moran's views on film music because he is quite obviously wrong.

As for Natalia Tena, I've always found her annoying, but tonight she really brought it to new levels. She should have been forgotten about after About A Boy, but no, they had to bring her back. She was probably the least pleasing member of the 'panel' because at least Nick Moran tried to express some sort of intelligent opinion, I don't think she said anything worthwhile the whole time she was there. Plus she fiddled. ALL THE TIME. She was like a small child who had been given way too much Coca-Cola.

Oh well, I thought, it can't be too much of them just chatting about how 'overrated' Hugo was or how Meryl Streep leaves Nick Moran 'cold'. After all, it's the red carpet coverage. So after an hour, I was getting a little worried. I could see from Twitter that people such as FilmFour and Total Film were seeing red carpet coverage somewhere, but Sky Movies was still lacking in any interviews with celebrities. I finally switched over to E! where the majority of people on Twitter seemed to be headed, and that was what I wanted to see. Some guy with a mic asking celebrities who they were wearing and a couple of questions about who they thought should win. Then there was a panel gossiping about the dresses and stars. If you're not going to have a proper debate about the films and nominees, then please go the whole hog and have really shallow discussion about the films. Given that all the credible film critics are probably at the Oscars, this is probably a safer bet than having people who think they know what they're talking about chat mindlessly about their favourite films.

Next year, please sort yourself out and actually give some decent coverage of the red carpet, or just don't bother. Also you could save a lot of money by not putting on the panel after each advert break, but rather just broadcast the whole ceremony live without any interruptions from annoying television presenters like Alex Zane.

Yours sincerely,
The writers at Movies, Music and Soap

Hey, you! Like the blog? Want to be involved? We're now on Twitter (@MoviesMusicSoap) so feel free to follow and drop us a line. Maybe there's something you want us to write about or maybe you have an idea you want to write yourself, get in touch! If you're a band, filmmaker or any other kind of artist and want us to review you, again, please get in touch! Or hey, maybe you're just lonely and fancy a chat...

Oscars 2012 (Episode II: Attack of the Academy Awards)

2012-02-23T17:26:00.000+00:00

This is actually the serious post about the Oscars, following the last shambles! We're not making predictions, this is just a post about which films we want to win. We usually end up backing the films that don't end up winning the award, so we're not much good there, but such is life. The ones in red are the ones we want to win, and the ones in blue are the ones we think will win.

Best Picture:

The Artist

The Descendants

Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close

The Help

Hugo

Midnight in Paris

Moneyball

The Tree of Life

War Horse

The Tree of Life was a pretentious load of garbage, and we haven't heard brilliant things about War Horse or Extremely.. (although the latter does look interesting). The Descendants was a really nice film, despite being generally quite scathing of George Clooney's performances. We think The Artist may win, if the BAFTAs and the worldwide crush the entire population of film critics seems to have on it, but we're supporting Hugo for this one. It was a beautifully made film, a lovely story and had a fantastic cast - even the kids were good! We didn't see it in 3D, and can't imagine it actually being that good in 3D as a lot of the beautiful set design would have been lost (that's our main problem with 3D films). Obviously we're always going to cheer on any Woody Allen film too, but Hugo was just lovely.

Best Director:

The Artist - Michel Hazanavicius

The Descendants - Alexander Payne

Hugo - Martin Scorsese

Midnight in Paris - Woody Allen

The Tree of Life - Terrence Malick

We didn't rate the Tree of Life, but it's the kind of thing that critics might enjoy. The Artist might get this too, just because it's the 'in thing' at the moment. The Descendants wasn't particularly unusual or stunning, so maybe it shouldn't win this particular award. As you may have guessed, we love Woody Allen, so any directing award for him is a good thing. Especially when you consider how hard he must work, and how much he does for his films, he usually writes, directs and produces them. However, he doesn't actually care about winning any Oscars, so we think Scorsese should get it for Hugo, just because it's such a lovely picture!

Actor in a Leading Role

Demian Bichir - A Better Life

George Clooney - The Descendants

Jean Dujardin - The Artist

Gary Oldman - Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

Brad Pitt - Moneyball

Surely it's got to be Clooney?! It'll probably go to Jean Dujardin (again, The Artist seems to be flavour of the month, so it really wouldn't surprise me). George Clooney was very good in The Descendants. Perhaps Gary Oldman should win an Oscar, but we don't think he will this year, and let's face it, everyone knows he's a top actor, maybe that's why we want Clooney to win.

Shamefully, we haven't seen any of the films that feature any of the actors nominated for Actress in a Leading Role, so we'll gloss over that with a Star Wars-esque scene sweep.

Actress in a Supporting Role

Berenice Bejo - The Artist

Jessica Chastain - The Help

Melissa McCarthy - Bridesmaids

Janet McTear - Albert Nobbs

Octavia Spencer - The Help

Shailene Woodley was robbed of a nomination for The Descendants and that's all we have to say about that. Probably one of the actors from The Help will win it as the Academy seem to like films about white people helping solve racism (see Sandra Bullock's performance in The Blind Side). It would be nice to see a comedy win an acting award, because that so rarely happens, so we're going to back Melissa McCarthy!

Music (Original Score)

The Adventures of Tintin - John Williams

The Artist - Ludovic Bource

Hugo - Howard Shore

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy - Alberto Iglesias

War Horse - John Williams

Kudos to John Williams for getting nominated twice! He's pretty much the most famous/successful/commercially viable film composer ever, so it's not like he needs the award. If he doesn't win, people aren't going to say "hey, there's that guy who almost won the Oscar once. Don't think we want him doing our movie." Also if you're making a movie that looks like it needs a John Williams soundtrack/are Steven Spielberg making any movie at all, chances are, you can afford to get John Williams to write the soundtrack. The music must carry The Artist, what with it being silent and all, but from what we've seen of it , it seemed like all music that's played in any 1920s movie ever or in any movie since that's depicting the 1920s. The music for Tinker Tailor Solider Spy, wasn't noticeable. If a film's soundtrack didn't stand out for us, chances are it wasn't very impressive, but that's just because we're massive soundtrack geeks!
This leaves Howard Shore. I guess he's a bit like John Willams really - he's been pretty successful since Lord of the Rings (he won three Oscars for two of the three films - two for the third one), and he's one of those people who if you're making some sort of epic film, you probably want him to write the music for it. However, he's done a lot of soundtrack work that wasn't epic orchestral work, plus he's the only composer to work with Tim Burton who wasn't Danny Elfman, so maybe it's time for him to win another Oscar?! Here's to guessing he might be nominated for one or both of The Hobbit films coming out this year and next year, so maybe he can wait. But we want it to be him! As far as the actual award goes, it's pretty open - John Williams is a favourite of everyone, so he's a safe choice, but they may feel they have to give Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy something.

It would be nice to see Harry Potter win the awards it's been nominated for - particularly Best Visual Effects, as it seems to have done a lot for visual effects in films, just because of what was required from J. K. Rowling's writings!

What would you like to see more of on Movies, Music and Soap?
	More music reviews
	More film reviews
	More funny stuff
	More pop culture stuff
	More serious analysis

pollcode.com free polls

Should they make a Buffy movie?
	Yes
	No
	Maybe
	Don't Care

pollcode.com free polls

Did you see The Dark Knight Rises this weekend?
	Yes
	No

pollcode.com free polls