<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CEACQ3s7fyp7ImA9WhRaFE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613</id><updated>2012-02-16T06:32:42.507-08:00</updated><category term="relative substitution" /><category term="Accounting profit" /><category term="Price leadership" /><category term="Opportunity cost principle" /><category term="principles of production" /><category term="Equi-marginal principle" /><category term="pricing issues" /><category term="dealing with uncertainty" /><category term="demand forecasting" /><category term="business trip management" /><category term="perfect competition" /><category term="input proportion" /><category term="Oligopoly" /><category term="substitutes replacing main  ingredient" /><category term="economic profit" /><category term="Diversification of risk" /><category term="Baumol’s model" /><category term="Bundling" /><category term="Product  differentiation" /><title>MS-09 Managerial Economics</title><subtitle type="html" /><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>17</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics" /><feedburner:info uri="ms-09managerialeconomics" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>Ms-09ManagerialEconomics</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QDSHY-fyp7ImA9WxJXGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-2151796024564367511</id><published>2009-06-12T11:27:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T11:29:39.857-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T11:29:39.857-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="principles of production" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="relative substitution" /><title>Explain the theoretical principles of production to explain ....</title><content type="html">Explain the theoretical principles of production to explain the relative&lt;br /&gt;substitution of one input for another occurring as a result of the increased price&lt;br /&gt;of labour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Answer. The production theory deals with quantitative relationships, i.e., technical and&lt;br /&gt;technological relations, between inputs, especially labour and capital, and between&lt;br /&gt;output and input.&lt;br /&gt;The Laws of production&lt;br /&gt;This law states the relationship between output and input. The traditional theory studies&lt;br /&gt;the marginal input-output relationships under short run and long run. In the short run,&lt;br /&gt;input – output relations are studied with one variable input, other inputs held constant&gt;&lt;br /&gt;the laws of production under these conditions are called ‘The laws of variable&lt;br /&gt;proportions’. In the long run input-output relations are studies assuming all the inputs to&lt;br /&gt;be variable. The long run relations are studies under ‘Laws of return to scale’.&lt;br /&gt;Input Prices - Substitution Effect&lt;br /&gt;Input prices do not remain constant. When input prices change, it changes the least&lt;br /&gt;cost input-combination and also the level of output, given the total cost. If all the input&lt;br /&gt;prices change in the same proportion, the relative prices of inputs remain unaffected.&lt;br /&gt;But, when the prices change at different rates in the same direction, or change at&lt;br /&gt;different rates in opposite direction or price o only one input changes while the price of&lt;br /&gt;the other input remains constant, the relative prices of the inputs change. A change in&lt;br /&gt;relative input-output prices changes both input-output-combination and the level of&lt;br /&gt;output.&lt;br /&gt;The change in the input-output combination results from the substitution effect of&lt;br /&gt;change in relative prices of inputs. A change in relative prices of inputs implies that&lt;br /&gt;some input has become cheaper in relation to the other. The cost minimizing firms,&lt;br /&gt;therefore, substitute relatively cheaper input for the costlier one. This is known as&lt;br /&gt;substitution effect of change in the relative input prices.&lt;br /&gt;Substitution effect = Price effect – Budget effect&lt;br /&gt;If the price of one input, say labour, increases, the firm will adjust the input mix by&lt;br /&gt;substitution capital for labour. If the price of labour declines, thus making labour&lt;br /&gt;relatively less expensive, labour will be substituted for capital. In general, if the relative&lt;br /&gt;prices of inputs change, managers will respond by substituting the input that has&lt;br /&gt;become relatively less expensive for the input that has become relatively more&lt;br /&gt;expensive.&lt;br /&gt;The isoquant – isocost framework can be used to demonstrate this principle. Let us&lt;br /&gt;suppose the firm is currently operating at point a where 100 units of output are&lt;br /&gt;produced using the resource combination (K = 10, L = 2). This is an efficient resource&lt;br /&gt;mix because the 100 unit isoquant is tangent to the isocost line CC. If the firm’s goal is&lt;br /&gt;to maximize production subject to a cost constraint (i.e., the firm is limited to resource&lt;br /&gt;combinations on a given isocost function).&lt;br /&gt;If the price of labour falls while the price of capital remains unchanged (i.e., labour has&lt;br /&gt;become relatively less expensive), the isocost pivots to the right from CC to the isocost&lt;br /&gt;CC1. The reduction in the price of labour means that the firm is able to increase the&lt;br /&gt;rate of production. Hence the firm moves from point a to point b, which is a new&lt;br /&gt;efficient resource combination. That is, the new isocost is tangent to the 120 –unit&lt;br /&gt;isoquant at point b. Now 9 units of capital and 6 units of labour are employed/. At point&lt;br /&gt;a, the efficient ratio of capital to labour was 5 : 1. Now the efficient ratio of two inputs is&lt;br /&gt;3: 2. The reduction in the price of labour has caused the firm to substitute that relatively&lt;br /&gt;less expensive input for capital.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-2151796024564367511?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/snPFh_eKe9svCf3_CFJugCUkK2o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/snPFh_eKe9svCf3_CFJugCUkK2o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/snPFh_eKe9svCf3_CFJugCUkK2o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/snPFh_eKe9svCf3_CFJugCUkK2o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/mtiqYD4-jrg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/2151796024564367511/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/explain-theoretical-principles-of.html#comment-form" title="38 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/2151796024564367511?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/2151796024564367511?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/mtiqYD4-jrg/explain-theoretical-principles-of.html" title="Explain the theoretical principles of production to explain ...." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>38</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/explain-theoretical-principles-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cFRnk8fSp7ImA9WxJXGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-1521147015604141535</id><published>2009-06-12T11:21:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T11:23:37.775-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T11:23:37.775-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oligopoly" /><title>Oligopolists are more likely to match the price-cut than a price increase by a competitor. Why?</title><content type="html">Oligopolists are more likely to match the price-cut than a price&lt;br /&gt;increase by a competitor. Why? Explain with the help of examples.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oligopoly: Oligopoly is a situation in which only a few firms (sellers) are&lt;br /&gt;competing in the market for a particular commodity. The distinguishing characteristics&lt;br /&gt;of oligopoly are such that neither the theory of monopolistic competition nor the theory&lt;br /&gt;of monopoly can explain the behaviour of oligopolistic firm.&lt;br /&gt;These characteristics are briefly explained below:&lt;br /&gt;Under oligopoly the number of competing firms being small, each firm controls an&lt;br /&gt;important proportion of the total (industry) supply. Consequently, the effect of a&lt;br /&gt;change in the price or output of one firm upon the sales of its rival firms is&lt;br /&gt;noticeable and not insignificant. When any firm takes an action its rivals will in all&lt;br /&gt;probability react to it. (i.e., retaliate). The behaviour of oligopolistic firms is&lt;br /&gt;interdependent and not independent or automistic as in the case under perfect or&lt;br /&gt;monopolistic competition.&lt;br /&gt;The demand curve of an individual firm under oligopoly is not known and is&lt;br /&gt;indeterminate because it depends upon the reaction of its rivals, which is&lt;br /&gt;uncertain. Each theory of oligopoly therefore makes a specific assumption about&lt;br /&gt;how rivals will (or will not) react to an individual firm’s action.&lt;br /&gt;In view of the uncertainty about the reaction of rivals and interdependence of&lt;br /&gt;behaviour, oligopolistic firms find its advantageous to co-ordinate their behaviour&lt;br /&gt;through explicit agreement (cartel) or implicit, hidden, understanding (collusion).&lt;br /&gt;Also because the number of firms is small, it is feasible for oligopolists to establish&lt;br /&gt;a cartel or collusive arrangement. However, it is difficult as well as expensive to&lt;br /&gt;monitor and enforce an agreement or understanding. Very few cartels last long&lt;br /&gt;particularly when oligopolistic firms significantly differ in their cost conditions.&lt;br /&gt;Under oligopoly, new entry is difficult. It is neither free nor barred. Hence the&lt;br /&gt;condition of entry becomes an important factor determining the price or output&lt;br /&gt;decisions of oligopolistic firms, and preventing or limiting entry an important&lt;br /&gt;objective.&lt;br /&gt;Given the indeterminacy of the individual firm’s demand and, therefore, the&lt;br /&gt;marginal revenue curve, oligopolistic firms may not aim at maximization of profits.&lt;br /&gt;Modern theories of oligopoly take into account the following alternative objectives&lt;br /&gt;of the firm:&lt;br /&gt;Sales maximization with profit constraint.&lt;br /&gt;Target or "fair" rate of profit and long-run stability.&lt;br /&gt;Maximization of the managerial utility function.&lt;br /&gt;Limiting (preventing) new entry.&lt;br /&gt;Achieving "satisfactory" profits, sales, etc. That is, the firm is a "satisficer" and not&lt;br /&gt;"maximizer".&lt;br /&gt;Maximization of joint (industry) profits rather than individual (firm) profits:&lt;br /&gt;TWO UNIQUE ASPECTS OF OLIGOPOLY COMPETITION&lt;br /&gt;In oligopoly industries, competition occurs in ways that are unique to these industries.&lt;br /&gt;Two unique aspects of oligopoly competition are mutual interdependence and repeated&lt;br /&gt;interaction.&lt;br /&gt;MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE&lt;br /&gt;Mutual interdependence exists when the actions of one firm has a major impact on the&lt;br /&gt;other firms in the industry. For instance, if Coke decides to sell more of its product (and&lt;br /&gt;to do so they reduce their prices), Pepsi will certainly notice that its sales fall. Coke's&lt;br /&gt;behavior affects Pepsi: mutual interdependence exists with in the US soft drink market.&lt;br /&gt;But, if a corn farmer in Kansas decides to plant another few more of corn, the sales of&lt;br /&gt;other corn farmers in the US will not be affected. An individual corn farmers' output is a&lt;br /&gt;very small part of US corn output; changes in output by one farmer will have no impact&lt;br /&gt;on the corn market. Mutual interdependence does not exist in the corn market. Mutual&lt;br /&gt;interdependence exists within an oligopoly industry because each of the oligopolists&lt;br /&gt;has a sizable part of the market. As a consequence, when it changes its sales, its&lt;br /&gt;prices, or its marketing strategies, this oligopoly firm will likely affect the sales of other&lt;br /&gt;firms within the industry. An analogy is the following. If you are on a ocean liner that&lt;br /&gt;holds 1,000 people you can stand up and jump up and down and have no effect on the&lt;br /&gt;other passengers. This is because you are very, very small compared to the boat and&lt;br /&gt;to the number of other passengers on the boat. But, if you are in a small rowboat with 2&lt;br /&gt;other people and you stand up the other 2 people will instantly notice that the boat is&lt;br /&gt;more unstable and, perhaps, threatens to capsize. They must actively shift their weight&lt;br /&gt;to keep the small boat from tipping over. The 3 people in the small row boat are&lt;br /&gt;mutually interdependent: what one person does can directly affect what happens to the&lt;br /&gt;other people on the boat.&lt;br /&gt;REPEATED INTERACTION&lt;br /&gt;Often the oligopolists within an industry have been competing with one another for a&lt;br /&gt;long time. For instance, Pepsi and Coke have competed within the same market for&lt;br /&gt;decades. Ford, GM, and Chrysler have faced one another in the US auto market for a&lt;br /&gt;very long time. Oligopolists in other markets might have competed with one another for&lt;br /&gt;a much shorter period of time, perhaps only a few years. But, in each of these cases,&lt;br /&gt;the oligopolists within these industries have experience with the others within the&lt;br /&gt;industry. For instance, whenever Pepsi decides to lower the price of its products it&lt;br /&gt;knows how Coke responded in the past to previous reductions in price by Pepsi.&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps Coke matches a Pepsi price reduction 10 out of the past 12 times Pepsi&lt;br /&gt;reduced its prices. In this case, Pepsi likely anticipates that when it lowers its prices&lt;br /&gt;this time, the odds are that Coke will respond in kind. Coke, on its part, also remembers&lt;br /&gt;what happened in its past competitive interactions with Pepsi. Coke and Pepsi&lt;br /&gt;remember, and take into account, what happened in the past when they design their&lt;br /&gt;current competitive strategies. The situation is characterizes as "repeated interaction."&lt;br /&gt;OLIGOPOLISTS ARE MORE LIKELY TO MATCH THE PRICE-CUT THAN A PRICE&lt;br /&gt;INCREASE BY A COMPETITOR - KINKED DEMAND CURVE&lt;br /&gt;The kinked demand curve has features common to most oligopoly markets. The kinked&lt;br /&gt;demand curve analysis does not deal with price and output determination. Rather, it&lt;br /&gt;seeks to establish that once a price quantity combination is determined, an oligopoly&lt;br /&gt;firm does not find it profitable to change its price even if there is a considerable change&lt;br /&gt;in cost of production. The logic behind this proportion is as follows. An oligopoly firm&lt;br /&gt;believes that if it reduces the price of its products, rival firms would follow and&lt;br /&gt;neutralize the expected gain from price reduction. But, if it raises its prices, rival firms&lt;br /&gt;would either maintain their prices or may even cut their prices down. In either case, the&lt;br /&gt;price raising firm stands to lose, at least a part of its market share. This behavioural&lt;br /&gt;assumption is made by all the firms with respect to others. The oligopoly firms,&lt;br /&gt;therefore, find it more desirable to maintain their price and output at the existing level.&lt;br /&gt;Examples&lt;br /&gt;In the cigarette business, as in many other American industries, we have what is known&lt;br /&gt;as an oligopoly, where a few large firms dominate the market and by various more or&lt;br /&gt;less legal means contrive to keep the prices for all brands uniform. Demand for&lt;br /&gt;cigarettes in general is thought to be highly inelastic, meaning that people will buy&lt;br /&gt;about the same number no what the price is; but demand for individual brands is highly&lt;br /&gt;elastic--people are fickle, and will readily switch to another brand if it's priced&lt;br /&gt;significantly lower. What this means is that if one manufacturer cuts his prices, he'll sell&lt;br /&gt;a lot more cigarettes, but mainly at the expense of his competitors. Knowing this, the&lt;br /&gt;competitors would immediately have to drop their own prices, and the upshot is that&lt;br /&gt;everybody ends up selling about as many cigarettes as before, only at a lower profit&lt;br /&gt;margin. For this reason the manufacturers try to avoid price competition if at all&lt;br /&gt;possible.&lt;br /&gt;Let’s take another example of Dell computers and Gateway. If either firm changes&lt;br /&gt;prices, they generally expect the worse. If Dell increases prices, Gateway does nothing&lt;br /&gt;and Dell gets hurt. If Dell reduces prices, Gateway responds by imposing their own&lt;br /&gt;price cut and the ensuing price war likely hurts Dell. Why would Gateway do this?&lt;br /&gt;Simply because these actions best help Gateway protect or increase its profit. If Dell&lt;br /&gt;increases their prices and Gateway does not, then Gateway will experience a boost in&lt;br /&gt;demand (Gateway computers and Dell computers are substitute products). As Dell&lt;br /&gt;computers are now higher priced, more consumers will buy from Gateway (although&lt;br /&gt;Gateway kept the same price as before). This can only help Gateway's sales, revenue,&lt;br /&gt;and profits. It is rational, then, for Gateway to keep their prices the same when Dell&lt;br /&gt;raises their prices. If Dell reduces their prices and Gateway does not, then Gateway will&lt;br /&gt;find they lose many sales to the (now) lower-priced competitor, Dell. In this situation,&lt;br /&gt;Gateway might find it is best to respond with their own price reduction in order to help&lt;br /&gt;maintain their sales, revenues, and profits. It is likely rational for Gateway to reduce&lt;br /&gt;prices when Dell reduces prices. As is clear, competition within this industry can be&lt;br /&gt;very nasty as firms attempt to take advantage of other firms (if these other firms raise&lt;br /&gt;their prices) or firms act to protect themselves by matching price reductions.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-1521147015604141535?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LxDJnbNjHsO9DKhzEcnlkPbWRuc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LxDJnbNjHsO9DKhzEcnlkPbWRuc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LxDJnbNjHsO9DKhzEcnlkPbWRuc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LxDJnbNjHsO9DKhzEcnlkPbWRuc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/5haHNEjiNVQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/1521147015604141535/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/oligopolists-are-more-likely-to-match.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1521147015604141535?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1521147015604141535?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/5haHNEjiNVQ/oligopolists-are-more-likely-to-match.html" title="Oligopolists are more likely to match the price-cut than a price increase by a competitor. Why?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/oligopolists-are-more-likely-to-match.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQHRnc_fip7ImA9WxJXGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-231533395461733261</id><published>2009-06-12T11:09:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T11:12:17.946-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T11:12:17.946-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pricing issues" /><title>Issues related to pricing are very important regarding introduction of competition. Discuss some of the important pricing issues...</title><content type="html">Issues related to pricing are very important regarding introduction of&lt;br /&gt;competition. Discuss some of the important pricing issues with special reference&lt;br /&gt;to the software industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Determination of prices is an important managerial function in all enterprises.&lt;br /&gt;Price affects the profit, demand, revenue, cost. The quantity sold varies with variations&lt;br /&gt;in the price. Thus pricing plays a vital role in profit planning. Banker is interested in&lt;br /&gt;how to mobilize the resources. Fire fighters are interested in how to prevent the fire&lt;br /&gt;rather than extinguish it. In the same manner every management attempts to maximize&lt;br /&gt;the level of output, minimize the cost and thereby accrue maximum level of profit. This&lt;br /&gt;could be best judged only by pricing. So setting up of an appropriate price is important&lt;br /&gt;for every enterprise.&lt;br /&gt;According to traditional economic theorists, the buyers and sellers alone determine the&lt;br /&gt;price. But now-a-days the determination of prices and outputs of various products&lt;br /&gt;depends upon the type of market structure in which they are produced, sold and&lt;br /&gt;purchased.&lt;br /&gt;Pricing theory under this hypothesis suggests that, given the demand and cost curves,&lt;br /&gt;price and output are so determined that profit is maximized, i.e., at the level of output&lt;br /&gt;where MR = MC. Some empiricists have however, produced the evidence, inadequate&lt;br /&gt;through, that the firms follow a pricing rule other the one suggested by the marginality&lt;br /&gt;rules. Besides, in a complex business world, business firms follow by them.&lt;br /&gt;Competition&lt;br /&gt;If a firm is not the market leader, competitive prices will influence the pricing of&lt;br /&gt;products or services. Market leaders have often created a "pricing standard" against&lt;br /&gt;which other product/service prices are compared. So if a firms product or service is&lt;br /&gt;reasonably competitive with the market leader's offering then it can set a price that is&lt;br /&gt;near the "standard". If the firm has the ability to price lower than the competition and&lt;br /&gt;still be profitable, it may be able to capture a greater market share which can benefit it&lt;br /&gt;over time.&lt;br /&gt;The firm’s decision to compete with a lower price should not be made lightly. If the&lt;br /&gt;competitor perceives that your low pricing has the potential of reducing their market&lt;br /&gt;share or impacting their influence in the industry, they may respond with an even lower&lt;br /&gt;price. Then, instead of increasing your market share, you could be faced with no&lt;br /&gt;opportunity to profitably penetrate the market at all. It is always of value to know the&lt;br /&gt;capabilities and tendencies of your competitors.&lt;br /&gt;A different form of competition is the 'alternative solution'. The prospect's first&lt;br /&gt;alternative is always, if the price is too high, a decision that they really don't need your&lt;br /&gt;offering or any of your direct competitor's offerings. There may also be a variety of&lt;br /&gt;ways for the prospect to solve their problem. For example, if you offer an airline&lt;br /&gt;service, you are really in the business of transportation. So your prospect has the&lt;br /&gt;option of your service versus trains, busses, rental vehicles, personal vehicles,&lt;br /&gt;hitchhiking, bicycles, walking or (back to the first alternative) staying at home. The&lt;br /&gt;availability of numerous alternative solutions will usually limit your pricing flexibility.&lt;br /&gt;SOFTWARE PRICING&lt;br /&gt;If you're a services company that's anxious to turn a reusable piece of code you&lt;br /&gt;developed into a product, one of your greatest challenges will be determining an&lt;br /&gt;appropriate price for your product. When you start thinking about how to determine the&lt;br /&gt;price, you'll probably naturally move toward cost-based pricing (a formula that is related&lt;br /&gt;to your development costs), or competition-based pricing (a formula related to what&lt;br /&gt;your competitors charge). Before you settle on a price using either of those basic&lt;br /&gt;pricing models, go back and reassess the opportunity for value-based pricing,&lt;br /&gt;especially if your product has a strong vertical market affinity.&lt;br /&gt;Value-based pricing requires that you be attuned to your potential customers and how&lt;br /&gt;they'll really use your product. Your competitors may not have used a value-based&lt;br /&gt;pricing model, so there may be an opportunity to define a new model that will mean&lt;br /&gt;higher profits for your company. Using informal survey techniques at industry trade&lt;br /&gt;shows, or even a focus group, you may find that your competitors' pricing models have&lt;br /&gt;created substantial pockets of would-be users who cannot effectively relate to the&lt;br /&gt;existing pricing model. For example, the product may be unaffordable for businesses&lt;br /&gt;with a certain number of users, or a certain number of daily transactions. Perhaps the&lt;br /&gt;up-front charges on the software are a barrier-to-entry for businesses of a certain size.&lt;br /&gt;Perhaps there are many businesses who can't use 50% of the functions provided by&lt;br /&gt;your competitors, and simply aren't willing to pay the price for functions they won't use.&lt;br /&gt;It's not uncommon to discover that customers are willing to pay your company more,&lt;br /&gt;maybe without even realizing it, as long as your fees match the structure or nature of&lt;br /&gt;that particular business. Decision-making can often be linked to simple and realistic&lt;br /&gt;calculations of the value that might be received by using a product.&lt;br /&gt;There are a wide variety of approaches, some of which can be used in conjunction with&lt;br /&gt;one another that can be used when you create a value-based pricing structure. These&lt;br /&gt;include user-based licensing, usage- or transaction-based licensing, site licensing,&lt;br /&gt;function-oriented fees, support-based fees, customization fees, customer revenuebased&lt;br /&gt;fees, and even leasing options. Needless to say, the pricing analysis can be an&lt;br /&gt;enlightening experience.&lt;br /&gt;Pricing strategy relies on a good understanding of customer price sensitivity. The&lt;br /&gt;Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector, including the software&lt;br /&gt;industry, is no different. Yet, some issues in this industry present unique challenges.&lt;br /&gt;1) Software is often a substantial investment both in relative and absolute terms&lt;br /&gt;Switching can be costly. Especially as time passes and more users become versed in&lt;br /&gt;the software. Beyond direct cost, maintenance and support, indirect costs such as&lt;br /&gt;training and implementation also make switching difficult. As a result, customers&lt;br /&gt;typically ascribe high value to reliability of the product and expected availability of the&lt;br /&gt;vendor for the long term. Reliability of the software and stability of the company will&lt;br /&gt;attract a less price-sensitive customer. Estimating the impact of these two factors will&lt;br /&gt;have a bearing on quantifying the price/value relationship.&lt;br /&gt;2) Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)&lt;br /&gt;A customer may be more interested in total price when assessing the investment in&lt;br /&gt;software. Often a customer expects the vendor to assume some of the risks associated&lt;br /&gt;with TCO. This has given rise to pricing structures such as subscription models, which&lt;br /&gt;avoid high up-front prices, spreading them over a longer period of time.&lt;br /&gt;3) Value perception among segments&lt;br /&gt;No uniform formula exists for assessing the benefit of a particular software. Most&lt;br /&gt;vendors try to provide an ROI that estimates and quantifies potential benefits. But real&lt;br /&gt;value varies from one customer to another. Segmenting customers into a number of&lt;br /&gt;distinct groups based on perceived value guarantees an understanding of price&lt;br /&gt;sensitivity.&lt;br /&gt;4) Shifting demand&lt;br /&gt;The largest proportion of software license investments are a one-time deal. A company&lt;br /&gt;buys a number of modules, and license seats for users to access the modules. Buyers&lt;br /&gt;may add modules or seats. Industry growth, however, is expected from new sales.&lt;br /&gt;Markets become saturated. The adoption of new software starts with large companies&lt;br /&gt;and eventually trickles down to smaller customers. As a product matures, growth&lt;br /&gt;opportunities come from smaller customers who are more price sensitive due to less&lt;br /&gt;buying power. The subscription model emerged to address this challenge.&lt;br /&gt;5) Software maturity&lt;br /&gt;Software maturity results from the lack of differentiation among offerings. At this point&lt;br /&gt;software vendors with greater brand recognition and larger market shares benefit. This&lt;br /&gt;is due to their cost leadership and greater ability to compete on price. Here is one&lt;br /&gt;illustration of a method for determining software price sensitivity.&lt;br /&gt;Factor Attribute Direction of&lt;br /&gt;price sensitivity&lt;br /&gt;1) Investment&lt;br /&gt;Quality/reliability/longevity of product&lt;br /&gt;primarily perceived in relation to the&lt;br /&gt;reputation of the vendor&lt;br /&gt;Increased&lt;br /&gt;2) TCO High TCO, increasing in relative terms as&lt;br /&gt;market demand shifts downwards&lt;br /&gt;Increased&lt;br /&gt;3) Price structure Emergence of subscription models and&lt;br /&gt;outsourcing&lt;br /&gt;Increased&lt;br /&gt;4) Value perception&lt;br /&gt;Some functionalities perceived very&lt;br /&gt;valuable, and some less valuable&lt;br /&gt;depending on the industry&lt;br /&gt;Depends&lt;br /&gt;5) Demand Rapidly shifting down to mid-market and&lt;br /&gt;low mid-market&lt;br /&gt;Increasing&lt;br /&gt;6) Differentiation Substitutes very easy to find; increased&lt;br /&gt;number of new entrants&lt;br /&gt;Increasing&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-231533395461733261?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zNIS1HUHaXGh9ayWIVaoGEW7D8M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zNIS1HUHaXGh9ayWIVaoGEW7D8M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zNIS1HUHaXGh9ayWIVaoGEW7D8M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/zNIS1HUHaXGh9ayWIVaoGEW7D8M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/9i60xOykr0c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/231533395461733261/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/issues-related-to-pricing-are-very.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/231533395461733261?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/231533395461733261?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/9i60xOykr0c/issues-related-to-pricing-are-very.html" title="Issues related to pricing are very important regarding introduction of competition. Discuss some of the important pricing issues..." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/issues-related-to-pricing-are-very.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0ENRn8_eCp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-3259615855604066630</id><published>2009-06-12T10:59:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T11:01:37.140-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T11:01:37.140-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Price leadership" /><title>‘Price leadership is an alternative cooperative method used to avoid tough competition’. Comment.</title><content type="html">‘Price leadership is an alternative cooperative method used to avoid&lt;br /&gt;tough competition’. Comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Answer. Price leadership is an observation made of oligopolic business behavior in&lt;br /&gt;which one company, usually the dominant competitor among several leads the way in&lt;br /&gt;determining prices, the others soon following.&lt;br /&gt;When business conditions permit, the price leader will raise prices with the expectation&lt;br /&gt;that the others will follow. The practice of price leadership prevails in many industries:&lt;br /&gt;automobiles, breakfast cereals, beer, steel and bank loans are among the many goods&lt;br /&gt;and services that are usually priced in this manner.&lt;br /&gt;On the surface, it looks as though the effect of price leadership is the same as the&lt;br /&gt;effect of the fixing of prices by a cartel or a trust. But there is a fundamental difference.&lt;br /&gt;The trust or cartel assigns production quotas to its members in order to keep&lt;br /&gt;production down. Competition does not exist in any form. Oligopolies that follow a price&lt;br /&gt;leader do not engage in price competition, but they still contest for market share with a&lt;br /&gt;variety of forms of non-price competition. Pepsi and Coke each spend billions on TV&lt;br /&gt;ads designed to entice the consumer to switch cola brands, but those expensive ads&lt;br /&gt;never mention price.&lt;br /&gt;An example. Company A has two principal competitors and a number of smaller niche&lt;br /&gt;players. The niche players serve focused geographic areas or offer specialty products&lt;br /&gt;or services to unique segments of the customer base. Company A is a premium priced&lt;br /&gt;producer and is a price leader. Each time it raises or lowers prices, its competitors also&lt;br /&gt;make a price move. If Company B has a current price which is 90% of Company A, then&lt;br /&gt;when Company A lowers its price Company B will adjust proportionally. Thus Company&lt;br /&gt;B will still have a price 90% of Company A. The reverse occurs when Company A takes&lt;br /&gt;a price increase.&lt;br /&gt;PRICE LEADERSHIP- AVOIDING TOUGH PRICE COMPETITION&lt;br /&gt;Price Leadership: Changing a price is always a dangerous practice for an oligopoly. If&lt;br /&gt;the firm lowers the price, its competitors are also likely to lower theirs, then all will&lt;br /&gt;suffer from lower profits. On the other hand, raising prices may lead to a loss of market&lt;br /&gt;share unless competitors also raise their prices. In many industries, one firm (usually&lt;br /&gt;the largest) is accepted by the others as the price leader. The price leader will be the&lt;br /&gt;first to adjust prices to new conditions (higher labor costs, lower raw materials costs,&lt;br /&gt;etc.) and the others will fall into line. Of course this arrangement is entirely informal and&lt;br /&gt;unwritten - since any actual agreement to follow such a practice would violate the&lt;br /&gt;antitrust laws.&lt;br /&gt;Price Setting: But on what basis does the price leader set prices? The interplay of&lt;br /&gt;supply and demand forces so beloved by neoclassical economists loses its cogency as&lt;br /&gt;a theory of prices when 1) there is too little competition to force prices to equal&lt;br /&gt;marginal costs and marginal benefits through a Darwinian struggle; 2) costs per unit fall&lt;br /&gt;with increased output as the firm is able to spread its fixed costs over a larger number&lt;br /&gt;of units; and 3) demand is itself subject to manipulation by the firm through advertising.&lt;br /&gt;Institutionalists and Post-Keynesians claim that the structure of oligopoly leads to a&lt;br /&gt;form of administered pricing. The price leader will use its average cost as a basis for&lt;br /&gt;price setting. Prices will be set at a level which achieves a target level of operating&lt;br /&gt;profits. This target level will be sufficient to enable the firm to self-finance expansion&lt;br /&gt;without the need to issue new stock or to borrow amounts of money that might threaten&lt;br /&gt;the firm's independence. Rather than constantly move the price up and down in order&lt;br /&gt;to sell as many units as the firm is capable of producing at a profit, the firm will normally&lt;br /&gt;adjust its output in order to maintain its target price. When this form of administered&lt;br /&gt;pricing is combined with the normal tendency of firms to expand, one result is that firms&lt;br /&gt;will usually have more production capacity than they use. When demand increases,&lt;br /&gt;they will increase output rather than prices.&lt;br /&gt;Enforcement of Price Leadership In the economic as in the political arena, leadership&lt;br /&gt;will occasionally be challenged. Sometimes the mere threat of lowering prices suffices.&lt;br /&gt;In 1989, Miller and Coors tried to expand their market shares by discounting their&lt;br /&gt;premium beers. Anheuser-Busch, with 41 percent of the U.S. beer market, simply&lt;br /&gt;issued a press release:&lt;br /&gt;We cannot permit a further slowing in our volume trend... [the company will take]&lt;br /&gt;appropriate competitive pricing actions to support our long-term market share growth&lt;br /&gt;strategy.&lt;br /&gt;Actually the Anheuser statement is simply a warning to competitors that if they do not&lt;br /&gt;stop discounting they will face a costly battle which they will certainly lose.&lt;br /&gt;But sometimes actual price reductions are necessary. In the late 1960s, Chrysler tired&lt;br /&gt;to break away from the pricing pattern then set by General Motors. But GM was a&lt;br /&gt;larger and more efficient producer and was not about to abandon its price-leader role.&lt;br /&gt;So GM lowered prices below the cost of production in those lines in which Chrysler was&lt;br /&gt;competitive. Thus Chrysler was left with a lower margin per vehicle sold but was still&lt;br /&gt;unable to expand its market share. When GM raised their prices again in 1971 Chrysler&lt;br /&gt;quickly followed. Chrysler also filed suit charging GM (and Ford) with predatory pricing,&lt;br /&gt;but Ford and GM were acquitted due to lack of evidence.&lt;br /&gt;Predatory Pricing A large or diverse firm that can stand temporary losses can cut its&lt;br /&gt;prices below the cost of production until it runs competitors out of business or&lt;br /&gt;establishes its price leadership. Then it can raise prices again. This is illegal. But it is&lt;br /&gt;very hard to prove, since normal competitive pressures can lead to prices set&lt;br /&gt;temporarily below the cost of production.&lt;br /&gt;SOME PRICE LEADERSHIP MODELS&lt;br /&gt;Barometric price leadership: The barometric price leadership is not a dominant firm.&lt;br /&gt;One firm in a group of firms of more or less comparable size comes to pay the role of&lt;br /&gt;price leader, not because of its dominant position in the market but because other firms&lt;br /&gt;regard its actions as a suitable barometer of changing market conditions. They are&lt;br /&gt;willing to follow its policies in the belief that competitive disturbances are minimized by&lt;br /&gt;so doing. But the actual powers of a barometric price leader are greatly restricted by its&lt;br /&gt;realization that other firms will follow him only with reasonable limits.&lt;br /&gt;Two simplified models of price leadership:&lt;br /&gt;Suppose there are only firms in the industry and they have assigned half of the market.&lt;br /&gt;Furthermore, suppose that they are producing homogeneous products, but one firm&lt;br /&gt;has lower costs that the other. The price and output policies of the two firms differ&lt;br /&gt;because of the different cost of the two firms.&lt;br /&gt;This can be illustrated with the following figure:&lt;br /&gt;DD presents the market demand curve and dd represents the firms demand curve. The&lt;br /&gt;firm 1 fixes the price at op 1 and its level of output is OM1 where as the firm 2 fixes its&lt;br /&gt;price at op 2 and produces OM2 amount of output. The firm 2 has comparatively&lt;br /&gt;advantageous position than the firm 1 because of its lower cost. Hence, the firm 2&lt;br /&gt;becomes the price leader.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-3259615855604066630?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uIGxGnFE07wekNAx6iz15rHHk2w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uIGxGnFE07wekNAx6iz15rHHk2w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uIGxGnFE07wekNAx6iz15rHHk2w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uIGxGnFE07wekNAx6iz15rHHk2w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/INw-sxSu6b4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/3259615855604066630/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/price-leadership-is-alternative.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/3259615855604066630?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/3259615855604066630?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/INw-sxSu6b4/price-leadership-is-alternative.html" title="‘Price leadership is an alternative cooperative method used to avoid tough competition’. Comment." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/price-leadership-is-alternative.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0QBRnY9fyp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-1397587311348231048</id><published>2009-06-12T10:55:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:55:57.867-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:55:57.867-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="economic profit" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Accounting profit" /><title>Differentiate between Accounting profit and economic profit.</title><content type="html">Differentiate between Accounting profit and economic profit.&lt;br /&gt;Illustrate with the help of examples.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Profit is defined as the residual value gained from business operations.&lt;br /&gt;However, the exact method of calculation differs between accountants and economists.&lt;br /&gt;Political economists may define profit in still other ways. Sidney Hook defined it as the&lt;br /&gt;cash value of unpaid labor, i.e. the value of all production after the breakeven point.&lt;br /&gt;This avoids deeply vague terms like "residual" and "gained." Economists and&lt;br /&gt;accountants measure profit in slightly different ways, profit will only be the same when&lt;br /&gt;all the factors of production have been credited their full opportunity cost.&lt;br /&gt;Economic profit&lt;br /&gt;Economists usually define profits as revenues less the opportunity costs of labor,&lt;br /&gt;capital, and materials. Furthermore, profits are divided into two types:&lt;br /&gt;Normal profits are the salaries paid to executives in exchange for their&lt;br /&gt;entrepreneurial skills.&lt;br /&gt;Economic profits are what remain after normal profits are subtracted. It is the&lt;br /&gt;economic profit that economists see as the incentive for firms to enter or leave a&lt;br /&gt;market.&lt;br /&gt;Some economists define further types of profit:&lt;br /&gt;Abnormal (or supernormal profit)&lt;br /&gt;Subnormal&lt;br /&gt;monopoly profit&lt;br /&gt;Economic profit is calculated as:&lt;br /&gt;where:&lt;br /&gt;p = profit&lt;br /&gt;P = price per unit&lt;br /&gt;Q = quantity of units sold&lt;br /&gt;AVC = average variable cost&lt;br /&gt;F = total fixed costs&lt;br /&gt;Economic profit can also be calculated by&lt;br /&gt;where C(q) is the cost function with respect to quantity.&lt;br /&gt;The derivative of the cost function is the marginal cost, and the value of the cost&lt;br /&gt;function with quantity 0 are the total fixed costs.&lt;br /&gt;Accounting profit&lt;br /&gt;In the accounting sense of the term, net profit (before tax) is the residual after&lt;br /&gt;deduction of all money costs such as; wages, rent, fuel, raw materials, interest on loans&lt;br /&gt;and depreciation. Gross profit is profit before depreciation and interest, Net profit after&lt;br /&gt;tax is after the deduction of either corporate tax (for a company) or income tax (for an&lt;br /&gt;individual). Operating profit is a measure of a company's earning power from ongoing&lt;br /&gt;operations, equal to earnings before the deduction of interest payments and income&lt;br /&gt;taxes.&lt;br /&gt;Another definition of accounting profit is the total revenue minus costs properly&lt;br /&gt;chargeable against the goods sold.&lt;br /&gt;TR = Total Revenue&lt;br /&gt;TC = Total Cost&lt;br /&gt;AR = Average Revenue&lt;br /&gt;AC = Average Cost&lt;br /&gt;Q = Quantity demanded/sold&lt;br /&gt;Profit = TR - TC&lt;br /&gt;Profit = (AR * Q) - (AC * Q)&lt;br /&gt;Profit = Q * (AR - AC)&lt;br /&gt;TR = TC results in normal profit.&lt;br /&gt;TR &gt; TC results in supernormal profit.&lt;br /&gt;Economic profit versus Accounting profit&lt;br /&gt;In calculating economic profit, opportunity costs are deducted from revenues earned.&lt;br /&gt;Opportunity costs are the alternative returns foregone by using the chosen inputs. As a&lt;br /&gt;result, you can have a significant accounting profit with little to no economic profit.&lt;br /&gt;For example, say you invest $100,000 to start a business, and in that year you earn&lt;br /&gt;$120,000 in profits. Your accounting profit would be $20,000. However, say that same&lt;br /&gt;year you could have earned an income of $45,000 had you been employed. Therefore,&lt;br /&gt;you have an economic loss of $25,000 (120,000 - 100,000 - 45,000).&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-1397587311348231048?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tgwW5qCWkNOOydMi7FOZMWmyoHE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tgwW5qCWkNOOydMi7FOZMWmyoHE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tgwW5qCWkNOOydMi7FOZMWmyoHE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tgwW5qCWkNOOydMi7FOZMWmyoHE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/PjNS98cMS4k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/1397587311348231048/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/differentiate-between-accounting-profit.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1397587311348231048?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1397587311348231048?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/PjNS98cMS4k/differentiate-between-accounting-profit.html" title="Differentiate between Accounting profit and economic profit." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/differentiate-between-accounting-profit.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YBRXo5eSp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-429567607493422427</id><published>2009-06-12T10:48:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:52:34.421-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:52:34.421-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="demand forecasting" /><title>What do you understand by demand forecasting?</title><content type="html">What do you understand by demand forecasting? Survey method is&lt;br /&gt;one of the techniques of demand forecasting. Discuss its different types.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Demand forecasting is predicting future demand for a product. The&lt;br /&gt;information regarding future demand is essential for planning and scheduling&lt;br /&gt;production, purchase of raw materials, acquisition of finance and advertising. It is much&lt;br /&gt;more where large-scale production is being planned and production involves a long&lt;br /&gt;gestation period.&lt;br /&gt;TYPES OF DEMAND FORECASTING&lt;br /&gt;There are two broad categories of forecasting. They are:&lt;br /&gt;Short-term forecasting&lt;br /&gt;Long –term forecasting&lt;br /&gt;Short-term Forecasting&lt;br /&gt;Forecasts for short periods normally do not exceed a year. There are number of&lt;br /&gt;purposes for which short term forecasts may be used. They are:&lt;br /&gt;In most companies knowledge of condition in the immediate future is essential for&lt;br /&gt;evolving a suitable sales policy. Production schedules have to be geared to expected&lt;br /&gt;sales, rather than to actual sales. If the firm assumes that prevailing conditions&lt;br /&gt;continue in the next year also, then it only has to face the problem of over production or&lt;br /&gt;short supply. Evolving suitable production policy is necessary to avoid the problem of&lt;br /&gt;over –production and the problem of short supply.&lt;br /&gt;Knowledge of near future conditions is important in purchasing. If prices of materials&lt;br /&gt;are expected to rise or shortages are expected, businessman may take advantage of&lt;br /&gt;the rise by easier buying. Proper price forecasting may, thus, help the firm in reducing&lt;br /&gt;costs of operation.&lt;br /&gt;Sales forecasting is useful to the businessman in determining appropriate price policy.&lt;br /&gt;An increase of price is avoided when future market conditions are not expected to be&lt;br /&gt;strong and the lowering of prices is avoided when costs and sales levels are likely to&lt;br /&gt;rise substantially.&lt;br /&gt;Many companies use forecasting for setting sales targets and for establishing controls&lt;br /&gt;and incentives. If targets are set too high, they will be discouraging salesman who fail&lt;br /&gt;to achieve them. If set too low, the targets will be achieved easily and hence incentives&lt;br /&gt;will prove meaningless.&lt;br /&gt;Short term sales forecasting will be of assistance. In short term financial forecasting&lt;br /&gt;cash requirements depend on sales levels and production operators. Moreover it takes&lt;br /&gt;time to arrange for funds on reasonable terms. Neglect of sales forecasting will&lt;br /&gt;therefore complicate financial planning of the company.&lt;br /&gt;Long-term Forecasting&lt;br /&gt;In short term forecasting, a company is concerned only about the use if its existing&lt;br /&gt;production capacity. But in the long term, capacity can be expanded or reduced. If the&lt;br /&gt;capacity is too limited some orders can not be filled and potential business is lost. In&lt;br /&gt;order to minimize these errors, the businessman must know something about long term&lt;br /&gt;demand for his product.&lt;br /&gt;Forecasts are important for several aspects of long term planning. They are as follows:&lt;br /&gt;Planning of a new unit as expansion of an existing unit must start with an analysis of&lt;br /&gt;the long-term demand potential of the products of the firm. A multi product firm must&lt;br /&gt;ascertain not only the total demand situations, but also the demand for different terms.&lt;br /&gt;If a company has better knowledge than its rivals of the growth trends of the aggregate&lt;br /&gt;demand and of the distribution of the demand, its competitive position would be much&lt;br /&gt;better. Once the demand potential is assessed it will easier for company to engage in&lt;br /&gt;long term financial planning. Planning for raising funds require considerable advance&lt;br /&gt;notice.&lt;br /&gt;Man power requirement in existing as will as new firms must be based on long-term&lt;br /&gt;forecasts of the company’s growth. Man power planning requires considerable lead&lt;br /&gt;time as training and personnel development are long term prepositions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Opinion Poll Methods&lt;br /&gt;a. Expert’s opinion survey method: Obtaining views from a group of specialists&lt;br /&gt;outside the firm has the possible advantages of speed and cheapness. This method is&lt;br /&gt;best suited in situations where intractable changes are occurring. Example: forecasting&lt;br /&gt;future technological states. It is possible that in cases where basic data are lacking&lt;br /&gt;experts may give divergent views, but even then it is possible for the manager to adapt&lt;br /&gt;his thinking on the basis of these views. Although this method is simple and&lt;br /&gt;inexpensive, it has its own limitations. First, estimates provided by the sales&lt;br /&gt;representatives or professional experts are reliable only to an extent depending on&lt;br /&gt;their skill to analyze the market and their experience. Second, demand estimates may&lt;br /&gt;involve the subjective judgement of the assessor that may lead to over or under&lt;br /&gt;estimation. Finally, the assessment of market demand is usually based on inadequate&lt;br /&gt;information available to the sales representatives they have only a narrow view of&lt;br /&gt;market.&lt;br /&gt;b. Delphi Method: This method is an extension of the simple expert opinion poll&lt;br /&gt;method. At its simplest, panel members are asked by letters to give their predictions of&lt;br /&gt;the likelihood of occurrence of specified events. Postal anonymity from other panel&lt;br /&gt;members minimizes the impact of personal inhibitions on the making of speculations&lt;br /&gt;about the future. Panel members are then informed by letters of the outcome and&lt;br /&gt;particulars of the consensus. Those who dissent are invited to give reasons or else&lt;br /&gt;modify their forecasts. This process may be repeated and the final range of outcome is&lt;br /&gt;regarded as a probabilistic forecast.&lt;br /&gt;c. Market Studies and Experiments: An alternative method of collecting necessary&lt;br /&gt;information regarding demand is to carry out market studies and experiments on&lt;br /&gt;consumer’s behaviour under actual, though controlled, market conditions. This method&lt;br /&gt;is known in common parlance as market experiment method. Under this method, forms&lt;br /&gt;first select some areas of representative markets- three or four cities having similar&lt;br /&gt;features, viz., population, income levels, etc. Then they carry out market experiments&lt;br /&gt;by changing prices, advertisement expenditure and other controllable variables in the&lt;br /&gt;demand function under the assumption that other things remain same. The controllable&lt;br /&gt;variables may be changed over time. After such changes are introduced, the&lt;br /&gt;consequent changes in the demand over a period of time are recorded. On the basis of&lt;br /&gt;data collected, elasticity coefficients are computed. These coefficients are then used&lt;br /&gt;along with the variables of the demand function to assess the demand for the product.&lt;br /&gt;2. Consumers survey method&lt;br /&gt;This method uses the most direct approach to demand forecasting by directly asking&lt;br /&gt;the consumers about their future consumption plan. It is of three types:&lt;br /&gt;Complete Enumeration Survey&lt;br /&gt;Sample Survey&lt;br /&gt;End-use Method&lt;br /&gt;a. Complete Enumeration survey: In the complete enumeration survey, the probable&lt;br /&gt;demands of all the consumers for the forecast period are summed up to have the sales&lt;br /&gt;forecast for the forecast period. For example, if there are n consumers and their&lt;br /&gt;probable demands for commodity X in the forecast period are x1, x2, x3…………… xn, the&lt;br /&gt;sales forecast would be&lt;br /&gt;?X = X1 + X2 + X3 + X4&lt;br /&gt;The advantages of this method are:&lt;br /&gt;it gives an unbiased information&lt;br /&gt;if all consumers expect accurately. The forecast will be accurate.&lt;br /&gt;However, the disadvantages are:&lt;br /&gt;contact with a large number of consumers&lt;br /&gt;tedious and cumbersome&lt;br /&gt;the authenticity of data is doubtful.&lt;br /&gt;Nevertheless, sales forecasts for products having a few consumers may be attempted&lt;br /&gt;by this method.&lt;br /&gt;b. Sample Survey: Under the sample survey method, the probable demand expressed&lt;br /&gt;by each selected unit is summed up to get the total demand of sample units in the&lt;br /&gt;forecast period. It is then blown up to find the total demand in the market. That is, the&lt;br /&gt;total sample demand id multiplied by the ratio of number of consuming units in the&lt;br /&gt;population to the number of consuming units in the sample.&lt;br /&gt;This method when carefully applied gives good results especially for new products and&lt;br /&gt;brands. Care should be taken is choosing a sample size which should not be too small&lt;br /&gt;(it will have high sampling error) or too big (it will have little error but will be costly and&lt;br /&gt;tedious). The advantages of sample survey over complete enumeration method are:&lt;br /&gt;less tedious&lt;br /&gt;less costly&lt;br /&gt;less data error&lt;br /&gt;c. End use method: The sale of the product under consideration is projected on the&lt;br /&gt;basis of demand survey of the industries using this product as an intermediate product.&lt;br /&gt;Demand for the final product is the end-use demand of the intermediate product used&lt;br /&gt;in the production of this final product. However, an intermediate product may have may&lt;br /&gt;end-uses (like steel can be used in agricultural machinery, construction, etc). It may&lt;br /&gt;have demand in both domestic and international markets. The demands for final&lt;br /&gt;consumption and exports net of imports are estimated through some other forecasting&lt;br /&gt;method and its demand for intermediate use is estimated through survey of its user&lt;br /&gt;industries regarding their production plans and input-output coefficient. Then the sum&lt;br /&gt;of final consumption demand and exports net of imports of any commodity can be&lt;br /&gt;obtained with the help of an input-output coefficient. Then the sum of final consumption&lt;br /&gt;demand and exports demand net of imports of any commodity can be obtained with the&lt;br /&gt;help of an input-output model.&lt;br /&gt;Such a method is feasible for national planning organizations only and not industry.&lt;br /&gt;The weaknesses of this method are:&lt;br /&gt;(i) It requires every industry to furnish its plan of production correctly and well-ahead of&lt;br /&gt;time.&lt;br /&gt;(ii) Individual industry will have to rely on some other method to estimate the future&lt;br /&gt;demand of its product for final consumption.&lt;br /&gt;(iii) Only the intermediate demand or the input demand part of total demand for a&lt;br /&gt;commodity can be predicted.&lt;br /&gt;The advantages of this method are:&lt;br /&gt;(i) Provides use-wise or sector-wise demand forecasts.&lt;br /&gt;(ii) Does not require any historical data.&lt;br /&gt;(iii) If the number of end users of a product is limited, it will be convenient to use this&lt;br /&gt;method.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-429567607493422427?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bd2Ls8G2uGnj_aB1-j8LumrAPEI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bd2Ls8G2uGnj_aB1-j8LumrAPEI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bd2Ls8G2uGnj_aB1-j8LumrAPEI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Bd2Ls8G2uGnj_aB1-j8LumrAPEI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/yo3F-7_rXbc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/429567607493422427/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/what-do-you-understand-by-demand.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/429567607493422427?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/429567607493422427?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/yo3F-7_rXbc/what-do-you-understand-by-demand.html" title="What do you understand by demand forecasting?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/what-do-you-understand-by-demand.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAFQH88eyp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-6310210065051554644</id><published>2009-06-12T10:43:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:45:11.173-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:45:11.173-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Opportunity cost principle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Equi-marginal principle" /><title>Opportunity cost principle, Equi-marginal principle</title><content type="html">Write short notes on:&lt;br /&gt;a. Opportunity cost principle&lt;br /&gt;b. Equi-marginal principle&lt;br /&gt;Illustrate your answers with examples.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(a) Opportunity cost principle&lt;br /&gt;Opportunity costs are cash outflows prevented by taking one course of action instead&lt;br /&gt;of another. They include returns, which the entrepreneur could have earned in&lt;br /&gt;alternative use of his services and capital.&lt;br /&gt;The concept of opportunity cost occupies a very important place in modern economic&lt;br /&gt;analysis. The opportunity costs or alternative costs are the return from the second best&lt;br /&gt;use of the firm’s resources which the firm forgoes in order to avail itself of the return&lt;br /&gt;from the best use of the resources. To take an example, a farmer who is producing&lt;br /&gt;wheat can also produce potatoes with the same factors. Therefore, the opportunity cost&lt;br /&gt;of a quintal of wheat is the amount of the output of potatoes given up. Thus we find that&lt;br /&gt;opportunity cost of anything is the next best alternative that could be produced instead&lt;br /&gt;by the same factors or by an equivalent group of factors, costing the same amount of&lt;br /&gt;money. Two points must be noted in this definition. Firstly, the opportunity cost of&lt;br /&gt;anything is only the next best alternative foregone. Secondly, in the above definition is&lt;br /&gt;the addition of the qualification or by an equivalent group of factors costing the same&lt;br /&gt;amount of money.&lt;br /&gt;The alternative or opportunity cost of a good can be given a money value. In order to&lt;br /&gt;produce a good the producer has to employ various factors of production and have to&lt;br /&gt;pay them sufficient prices to get their services. These factors have alternative uses.&lt;br /&gt;The factor must be paid atleast the price they are able to obtain in the alternative uses.&lt;br /&gt;Suppose a businessman can buy either a washing machine or a press machine with his&lt;br /&gt;limited resources and suppose that he can earn annually Rs. 40,000 and 60,000&lt;br /&gt;respectively from the two alternatives. A rational businessman will certainly buy a press&lt;br /&gt;machine that gives him a higher return. But, in the process of earning Rs. 60,000 he&lt;br /&gt;has foregone the opportunity to earn Rs. 40,000 annually from the washing machine.&lt;br /&gt;Thus, Rs. 40,000 is his opportunity cost or alternative cost. The difference between&lt;br /&gt;actual and opportunity costs is called economic rent or economic rent or economic&lt;br /&gt;profit. For example, economic profit from press machine in the above case is Rs.&lt;br /&gt;60,000 –Rs. 4000 = Rs. 20,000. So long as economic profit is above zero, it is rational&lt;br /&gt;to invest resources in press machine.&lt;br /&gt;(b) Equi-marginal principle&lt;br /&gt;The equi-marginal principle was originally associated with consumption theory and the&lt;br /&gt;law is called ‘the law of equi-marginal utility’. The law of equi-marginal utility states that&lt;br /&gt;a utility maximizing consumer distributes his consumption expenditure between various&lt;br /&gt;goods and services he/she consumes in such a way that the marginal utility derived&lt;br /&gt;from each unit of expenditure on various goods and services is the same. The pattern&lt;br /&gt;of consumer’s expenditure maximizes a consumer’s total utility.&lt;br /&gt;The law of equi-marginal principle has been applied to the allocation of resources&lt;br /&gt;between their alternative uses with a view to maximizing profit in case a firm carries out&lt;br /&gt;more than one business activity. This principle suggests that available resources&lt;br /&gt;(inputs) should be so allocated between the alternative options that the marginal&lt;br /&gt;productivity gain (MP) from the various activities are equalized. For example, suppose&lt;br /&gt;a firm has a total capital of Rs. 100 million which it has the option of spending on three&lt;br /&gt;projects, A, B, and C. Each of these projects requires a unit expenditure of Rs. 10&lt;br /&gt;million. Suppose also that the marginal productivity schedule of each unit of&lt;br /&gt;expenditure on the three projects is given as shown in the following table.&lt;br /&gt;Units of Expenditure Marginal Productivity (MP)&lt;br /&gt;(Rs. 10 million) Project A Project B Project C&lt;br /&gt;1st 501 403 354&lt;br /&gt;2nd 452 305 306&lt;br /&gt;3rd 357 208 209&lt;br /&gt;4th 2010 10 15&lt;br /&gt;5th 10 0 12&lt;br /&gt;Going by the equi-marginal principle, the firm will allocate its total resource (Rs. 100&lt;br /&gt;million) among the projects A, B and C in such a way that marginal product of each&lt;br /&gt;project is the same i.e., MpA = MPB = MPC. It can be seen from the above table that&lt;br /&gt;going, by this rule, the firm will spend 1st, 2nd, 7th, and 10th unit of finance on project A,&lt;br /&gt;3rd, 5th, and 8th unit on Project B, and 4th, 6th, and 9th unit on project C. In all, it puts 4&lt;br /&gt;units of its finances in project A, 3 units each in projects n and C. In other words, of the&lt;br /&gt;total finances of Rs. 100 million, a profit maximization firm would invest rs. 40 million in&lt;br /&gt;project A, Rs. 30 million each in projects B and C. This pattern of investment maximizes&lt;br /&gt;the form’s productivity gains. No other pattern will ensure this objective.&lt;br /&gt;The equi-marginal principle suggests that a profit maximizing firms allocates&lt;br /&gt;MpA = MPB = MPC = … = MPN&lt;br /&gt;If cost of project (COP) varies from project to project, then resources are so allocated&lt;br /&gt;that MP per unit of COP is the same. That is, resources are are allocated in such&lt;br /&gt;proportions that&lt;br /&gt;The equi-marginal principle can be applied only where (i) firms have limited investible&lt;br /&gt;resources, (ii) resources have alternative uses, and (iii) the investment in various&lt;br /&gt;alternative uses is subject to diminishing marginal productivity or returns.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-6310210065051554644?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RQotmFZnCk9dPDbqDaJ-Y3K5kiY/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RQotmFZnCk9dPDbqDaJ-Y3K5kiY/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RQotmFZnCk9dPDbqDaJ-Y3K5kiY/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/RQotmFZnCk9dPDbqDaJ-Y3K5kiY/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/47Q3Ggzq7hE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/6310210065051554644/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/opportunity-cost-principle-equi.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/6310210065051554644?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/6310210065051554644?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/47Q3Ggzq7hE/opportunity-cost-principle-equi.html" title="Opportunity cost principle, Equi-marginal principle" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/opportunity-cost-principle-equi.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYFSHo9fyp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-53802254087089558</id><published>2009-06-12T10:34:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:35:19.467-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:35:19.467-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bundling" /><title>‘Bundling’ has emerged as an important aspect of ‘ consumer pricing ?</title><content type="html">‘Bundling’ has emerged as an important aspect of ‘ consumer pricing ?  Discuss this with  special  reference to the telecom sector?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Everyone must have come across campaigns  of the following  kind. “Buy one, get the second at half-price.” A camera is sold in a box with a free film; a hotel  room often comes with accompanying breakfast. These  are examples of bundling. Bundling  is the  practice of selling two more separate. Products together  for a single price i.e bundling  takes  place  when goods  or services which could  be sold separately are sold as a package. A  codification of  bundling  practices and definitions of selling strategies is;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pure bundling   :  Products are sold only as bundles;&lt;br /&gt;Mixed bundling : Products are sold both separately and as a bundle, and &lt;br /&gt;Tying                 : The purchase of the main  product ( tying product) requires&lt;br /&gt;The purchase of another product( tied product ) which is          generally  an additional complementary products.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; This is not  an  exhaustive list but  covers the most frequently encountered cases. Pure bundling involves selling two products only as a package and not separately.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    Pure Bundling &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;   Bundling   Product&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;     Product&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;     Product     &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Example of Telecom:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Reliance WLL- Cell phone  instrument (handset) and connection are only available  together and not  available separately. Microsoft’s  bundle of windows  and Internet Explorer  could be considered a pure bundle. Also Cable TV Channels are an example of pure  bundling. In North America it is not possible to get only Disney Channel has it is always bundled with other premium Channels. In India, the prospective CAS (Conditional Access System) also  similar channel packages where some of the channels can’t be purchases separately  like  Zee TV , would  only be available with other, Zee channels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Bundling can be good for consumers it can reduce “ search costs” as well as the producer ‘X’ distribution costs. There are lower “ transaction costs”. And the producer may be a more efficient bundler than the  customer. Few of us choose, after all, to buy the individual parts of a computer to assemble them over selves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In  perfectly competitive markets, bundling  should happen only if it is more efficient than selling the products separately. Where there is less than perfect competition that is, most markets-economic models  suggest that bundling  sometimes benefits consumers and sometimes producers. When  firm have a measure of market power, they can  engage in price discrimination, charging different prices to different customers, bundling  can play a part in price  discrimination, as different bundles of goods and prices may appeal to different customer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bundling  of services in Telecom sector:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; There is an investing  change  in this sector. Which is the multiple licenses owned by a single company. India has issued separate licenses for basic, cellular, NLD, ILD,ISP, services. In view of the fact  that a single operator has  acquired multiple licenses and   can thus offer multiple services, one  of the innovations that has occurred relates to bundled offers. The ability to offer  bundles, however, does not depend upon possession of multiple licenses, but allows an integrated operator to design more boundless and innovative schemes compared to a stand-alone operator. Some of the bundled offers are described below.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) CUG (Closed User Group):- Forming a group of customers where the colls within  group are either not charged or are charged very low and the colls made outside the group are charged higher.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) Fuends &amp; Family:- Unlimited free talk time to a selected number for a cost a fixed monthly charge.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3) Free  VAS (Value Added Services) :-  Such  as SMS,CUP Free with certain  tariff plans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(4) Unlimited usage free:- Tariffs with high monthly  rental and unlimited free usage. This may  attract the high collers and this type of packages also ensures a minimum ARPU ( Average Revenue Per User) to the service provides.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(5) Zero Rental:- Packages with no Zero rental and high calls charges. This type of package may attract very low users, who want to own a phone use it very rarely.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(6) Prepaid  plans with  no administrative charges  or plan  free. This ensures a fixed  ARPU to service provider.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(7) Plans to lack customers for a longer period of time:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Tariff plan for  minimum commitment  of 3 years. Although it provides a facility  to the customer to exist the plan but at  Avery high cost, which discourages the customers from exiting the plan.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-53802254087089558?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpzO44SwrHQavSl7b9LaRegjM4s/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpzO44SwrHQavSl7b9LaRegjM4s/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpzO44SwrHQavSl7b9LaRegjM4s/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpzO44SwrHQavSl7b9LaRegjM4s/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/bb2oMV3Atas" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/53802254087089558/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/bundling-has-emerged-as-important.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/53802254087089558?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/53802254087089558?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/bb2oMV3Atas/bundling-has-emerged-as-important.html" title="‘Bundling’ has emerged as an important aspect of ‘ consumer pricing ?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/bundling-has-emerged-as-important.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUICSHk9cSp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-7964488089376384650</id><published>2009-06-12T10:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:26:09.769-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:26:09.769-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="perfect competition" /><title>Discuss  the relevance of perfect competition  in the present context?</title><content type="html">Discuss  the relevance of perfect competition  in the present context?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans: Perfect competition in that situation  of the market wherein  there are large number of buyers and sellers of a homogeneous product  and the price of such product and the price of such product is determined by the  market forces i.e. the industry.  All the firms sell the product at this price.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According  to left witch,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“ Perfect  competition  is a market  in which there are many firms selling identical  products with no firm large enough relative to the entire market to be able to influence market price”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Features of perfect competition :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Large  number but small size of Buyers and Sellers:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The number of  buyers and sellers of a commodity is very large under perfect  competitors, but each buyer and each seller is so small in comparison with the entire market of the product, that by changing the quantity of the product bought &amp; sold by him, he cannot  influence its price, it means, under perfect  competition no firm can influence the market5 price by changing  the quantity of its product.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) Homogeneous products:- The other assumption of homogeneous units of given product.  The units sold by Ram &amp; Co. are exactly  similar to the units sold by Sham &amp; Co. consequently buyers have no lea son to prefer the product of one seller to the one  of another seller. Because of large number of seller and homogeneous products, a firm operating under the condition of perfect competition in mearly as price takes and not a price maker..&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; (3) Perfect knowledge:- Buyers and sellers are fully aware of the price of the product prevailing in the market. Buyers  have perfect knowledge about the price being  charged by the sellers for a given  product. Sellers also known well, where and from which  buyer, they can charge more price. Because of this knowledge and awareness, all sellers will change one price  for one product from all will change one buyers without any distinction. There will therefore, be no uncertainty in the market.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;4) Free entry and  Exit of firms:- Under perfect  competition, in the long run, any new firm can enter any industry and any old firm can  withdraw  from any industry . There  is no legal or social  restriction on the entry of new firms into any industry. This assumption is subsidiary to the first assumption  regarding  large number  of sellers it is because of free entry of firms that their number is very large.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(5)Free from checks:- Buyers and sellers are free from any  checks of restriction which regard to their buying and selling  of any product. There is no agreement between buyers and sellers in respect of the production, quantity or price of a good. Nor have the buyers any attraction to buy the from a particular seller Government also imposes no restrictions in this matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(6) Perfect mobility:- Another important assumption of perfect competition is that in such a market there in perfect mobility of factors as well as goods &amp; services.  Factors of production  are free to seek employment in any industry that they like. No factor of production is monopolized by anyone. Each firm can get as many  factors  as it needs. Goods and services can be sold at any place where they are libely to fetch good price .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(7) Lack  of Selling  Costs:-  In a perfect competition  a seller does not spend on advertisement and publicity etc. It is  so because all firms sell homogeneous product. Hence, there is no need on the part of a firm to incur selling cost.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(8) Same price:- Under competitive market, each seller charges the same price for the same product. Price is determined by the industry. All firms have to sell their products at this price. Average revenue and marginal revenue of the product are equal, firms under perfect competition are price-takes and not price-maker. According to a case,  In 1931, the Pepsi-Cola company  was in  bankruptcy for the second time in 12 Years. The president  of Pepsi, Charles G.Guth, even tried to sell the company  to Coca-Cola, but coke wanted  no part of the deal. In order to reduce  costs, Guth purchased a large supply  of recycled 12- ounce beer bottles. A that time, both  pepsi and coke were sold in six ounce  bottles. Initially pepsi priced the bottles  at 10 cents, twice the amount of the original six  ounce bottles, but with little success. Then, however , with had the brilliant idea of selling the 12 ounce bottles of cokes. Sales took off, and by 1934, pepsi was out of bankruptcy and soon making a very nice profit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; After Marshall, a famous 19th   century,  economist,  used a fish market as  an example of perfect competition. For the sake of agreement, consider a fishmonger selling Cod. How would he price his product? First, he would looks around and find out at what price his numerous competitors were selling cod. He certainly could not price above the competitors, Since cod is  pretty much  identical and consumers should not care from whom  they purchase . Further more, in fish markets, it is quite easy for  customers to compare price. So, if he priced above his competitors, he would not sell any fish. Suppose  he decided to price  below his competitor. All of the customers would certainly purchase from him. However, if he were still making a profit at the lower price and would march the price cut in order to retain their  customers. They may even  consider lowering  price more, if they could still make a profit and capture further customers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; This reasoning , along  with the case of entry for new fish mongers, if there is  a profit to be made, ensures that the price being charged is equal  to the cost of supplying an additional fish, or the marginal cost. A fish monger will be  a price-taker, setting his price identically to his competitors prices. A firm is a monopoly if it has exclusive control over the supply  of  a product or services. Therefore, a monopolist, in his pricing  decisions, cannot consider the pricing  decision of rival firms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The smart monopolist consider the incremental effect of his decision, i.e what is the revenue to be  received from selling  one additional unit of a product and what are the costs of selling one additional  unit of a product. Certainly  if the costs of selling  one additional units of a product. The low of demand says that he could raise  the price of his product and thus sell less. Alternatively, if the revenues of selling an additional units of a product and thus sell less. The law  of demand  says that he could  sell more by lowering his price.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Thus by setting  the price correctly, the monopolist can sell the exact number of units such that  the costs of selling  one additional out exactly equals the revenue  of selling the additional unity which by the above reasoning, is the only optimal price.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-7964488089376384650?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xTXadE69sOh6iiZdNljxrYLgbAE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xTXadE69sOh6iiZdNljxrYLgbAE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xTXadE69sOh6iiZdNljxrYLgbAE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xTXadE69sOh6iiZdNljxrYLgbAE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/zQYSOdtJjiY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/7964488089376384650/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-relevance-of-perfect.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7964488089376384650?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7964488089376384650?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/zQYSOdtJjiY/discuss-relevance-of-perfect.html" title="Discuss  the relevance of perfect competition  in the present context?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-relevance-of-perfect.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUMMSHY4fSp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-628513640091419740</id><published>2009-06-12T10:24:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:24:49.835-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:24:49.835-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="input proportion" /><title>‘In the long- run, no input must be used in fixed proportions’. Discuss.</title><content type="html">‘In the long- run, no input must be used in fixed proportions’. Discuss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans: Yes, it is true in the long run, that no input  must be used  in fixed proportions if the minerals become increasingly scare, and their price rise substantially, alternative processes will be found that use less of these minerals. As the price of the minerals rise, producers will find ways to decrease the proportions in which these minerals are used.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; So,  in the long run, no input must be used in fixed all the inputs are invariable proportions. In 1970, people found ways to use less as it become more expensive. Before that period no one thought that would be possible. During world war II, manufacturer learned to use synthetic rubber when natural rubber become almost on existent. As wood  become more expensive  at the turn of the century people learned to useless wood. For this reasons we will  continue to concentrate on production under variable proportions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In long run, all inputs one variable, there is no input is used in fixed proportions if in the long run inputs are used in  fixed  proportions then their will be scarcity of inputs. The  natural inputs are very  scare in nature if these inputs are lost in future then there is no alternative availed except the use of its substitutes. So, that’s why in the long run, according  to the demand of the products, the inputs are used. The proportion of inputs in the long period can be increased or decreased but according to the demand &amp; supply of demand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; So, In the long run no input used in fixed proportions.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-628513640091419740?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fF8IAVClHBWWI4XDyjKALufdE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fF8IAVClHBWWI4XDyjKALufdE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fF8IAVClHBWWI4XDyjKALufdE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/d2fF8IAVClHBWWI4XDyjKALufdE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/jpi3K5SyMvY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/628513640091419740/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/in-long-run-no-input-must-be-used-in.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/628513640091419740?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/628513640091419740?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/jpi3K5SyMvY/in-long-run-no-input-must-be-used-in.html" title="‘In the long- run, no input must be used in fixed proportions’. Discuss." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/in-long-run-no-input-must-be-used-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUNRHY8fCp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-7285731763866000367</id><published>2009-06-12T10:20:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:21:35.874-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:21:35.874-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="substitutes replacing main  ingredient" /><title>It is necessary that the substitutes can replace the main  ingredient . Discuss..</title><content type="html">It is necessary that the substitutes can replace the main  ingredient (minerals in this case) ? Why or why not? Discuss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans:- Why   Yes substitutes can replace the main  ingredient substitutes  is used when there is any particular  thing is available in scare condition.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; As in the case of “SOUTH AFRICA’S MINERALS”, South Africa Plays key role in producing of several vital minerals. They produce huge  amount of chromium, used in  stainless steel and an important fraction of the total world output of manganese. If  the supply  of these minerals is not availed in present time to due to scarcity of these minerals. Then the solutions is to find substitutes for the South African Minerals. For many uses, Aluminum is working stainless steel other metals and ceramics, through not as efficient, could replace platinum as a catalyst.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why not &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;If we  denote use the  substitutes for the usage of minerals then the natural minerals would be totally scared from the world. During  world war II, manufacturers learned to use synthetic rubber when  natural rubber become almost  not existent. When one particular thing  is become more expensive then one should go for substitute of that  thing which less expensive &lt;br /&gt;So, this is not totally necessary that the substitutes can replace  the main ingredient. Substitutes can replace the main ingredient up to some  extent  but not replace the whole thing. Like for many uses, aluminum and manganese could replace Chromium in making stainless steel.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-7285731763866000367?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/orOdWAxrPQbDNitmeGjr8uc1m14/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/orOdWAxrPQbDNitmeGjr8uc1m14/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/orOdWAxrPQbDNitmeGjr8uc1m14/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/orOdWAxrPQbDNitmeGjr8uc1m14/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/1kYo738ZFgA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/7285731763866000367/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/it-is-necessary-that-substitutes-can.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7285731763866000367?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7285731763866000367?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/1kYo738ZFgA/it-is-necessary-that-substitutes-can.html" title="It is necessary that the substitutes can replace the main  ingredient . Discuss.." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/it-is-necessary-that-substitutes-can.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUGQHs5eSp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-4303233467828830470</id><published>2009-06-12T10:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:20:21.521-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:20:21.521-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="business trip management" /><title>Discuss the factors that determine the total  cost of of business trip.</title><content type="html">Suppose  that you manage a business and have  to make a business trip of two or four days at least once  in a month. Discuss the factors that determine the total  cost of the help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans. Factors  to determine the total cost of the business trip is the sum of both explicit cost of implicit cost. It means Total Cost +Implicit Cost.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Explicit Cost:- Explicit cost are those cost that involve an actual payment to other parties. In other word explicit cost is the monitory payment made by a firm for the use of an input owned or controlled by others.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the words of  lift witch, “ explicit cost are those cash payments which firms make to outsiders for their services and goods.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examples of explicit cost of business trip:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Transportation cost &lt;br /&gt;2. Business Expenses&lt;br /&gt;3. Cost of raw material&lt;br /&gt;4. Salaries of Workers&lt;br /&gt;5. Purchasing of business equipment.&lt;br /&gt;6. Rent of business premises&lt;br /&gt;7. Interest of an takes for business&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; All these expenses are called explicit cost. Which are paid to others for the use of their resources and services. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(II) Implicit Cost :- Implicit cost  represent the value of forgone opportunities but do not involve  an actual cash payment. Implicit cost are just as important as explicit cost but are sometimes neglected because they are not as obvious.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In other word implicit cost are the cost of an entrepreneur’s own  factors or resources. These arise when a firm makes use of its own resources.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The examples of implicit cost is&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Own land on which business settled&lt;br /&gt;2. Own  building for business purposes.&lt;br /&gt;3. Own capital applied for running their business&lt;br /&gt;4. Salary payed to owner manager&lt;br /&gt;5. Interest on  owners equity etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All these expenses are called implicit cost, which arises when a firm makes use of its own resources. According to left witch&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; “Implicit cost are costs of self-employed resources”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So it means:     Total Cost = Explicit Cost + Implicit Cost&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, Combinations of all explicit  expenditure and implicit expenditure firm can determine the total cost of the trips.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-4303233467828830470?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/X6f8nTR3EzmReC9sS02t8XH9LwM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/X6f8nTR3EzmReC9sS02t8XH9LwM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/X6f8nTR3EzmReC9sS02t8XH9LwM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/X6f8nTR3EzmReC9sS02t8XH9LwM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/Ze_F8jVoVhQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/4303233467828830470/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-factors-that-determine-total.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/4303233467828830470?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/4303233467828830470?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/Ze_F8jVoVhQ/discuss-factors-that-determine-total.html" title="Discuss the factors that determine the total  cost of of business trip." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-factors-that-determine-total.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8MRn0-cCp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-5704865723264800544</id><published>2009-06-12T10:14:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:14:47.358-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:14:47.358-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Diversification of risk" /><title>Define risk. What do you understand  by ‘Diversification ‘ of risk?</title><content type="html">Define risk. What do you understand  by ‘Diversification ‘ of risk? Illustrate your answer with some examples.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans. The meaning of risk is that there is some possibility of advise happening . In other words risks in uncertainty of Income / capital appreciation or loss or both.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We can  define risk as &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“risks is that in which  there is some chances of adverse happening whether it could be in the form of profits or in  the form of loss”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So, from  the above definition it is now clear that risk means uncertainty of income, capital appreciation or loss  or it can be both.&lt;br /&gt;The two major types of risks are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Systematic or market related risk and un-systematic  risk ( or diversifying  risk) or company related risks. The systematic risks are the market problems, raw material availability tax policy or any Government policy, inflation risks, interest rate risk and financial risk. The systematic risk or  diversifying risk are like mismanagement, increasing inventory wrong financial policy, defective marketing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Diversification of risks:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Risk is an uncertain  thing. Risk can be minimized only if it is diversified in to few companies belonging to various industry groups, assets groups or different types of instruments like equity shares, bonds, debentures etc. Thus assets  classes are bank deposits, company deposits, gold silver, land, real estate, equity shares etc. Industry groups are  tea, sugar, paper, cement, steel electricity, electronics, computer software etc. Each  of them  have different risks-return  characteristics and investments are to be made; based on individual risk preferences.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Diversification of risk can be of three type:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Business Risk:-&lt;br /&gt;(2) Financial Risk:-&lt;br /&gt;(3) Default of Insolvency Risk:-&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Business Risk: This  relates to the variability of business, sales, income, profits etc. Which in  turn depend on the market conditions for the product mix,  input supplies, strength of competitors etc. This business risk is sometimes external to the company due to the change of Government or in Govt. policies or strategies of competitors or  unforeseen market conditions. They may be internal due to full in production, lab our problems, raw material problems or inadequate supply of electricity etc. The internal Business risks lead to fall in revenues and in profits of the company, but can be corrected by certain changes in the company’s policies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(2) Financial Risk:    This relates to the method of financing , adopted by the company, high leverage leading to large  debt servicing problems or short-term liquidity problems due to bad debts, delayed receivables and fall in current assets or risk in current liabilities. These problems could no doubt  be solved, but they may lead to fluctuations in earnings, profits, these may lead to fall in returns to investors or negative returns. Proper  financial  planning and other financial adjustments can be used to correct this risk and as such it is controllable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(3)   Default or insolvency Risk :-      The borrower or issuer of securities may become insolvent or may default, or  delay the  payments due, such as interest installments or principal payments. The  borrower’s credit rating  might have fallen suddenly and he become default prone and in its extreme from  it may be  take to insolvency or bankruptcies. In such cases, the investor may get  no return or negative returns. An investment in a healthy company’s share might turn out to be a waste paper, if within  a short span, by the deliberate mistakes of management or acts of God, the company become risk and its share price tumbled below its face value.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examples&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There is two investors, I and II are being considered. Both investments require and initial cash  outlay of Rs.100 and have a life of 5 year. The return on each depends on the rate of inflation over the 5 year period. Of course, the inflation  rate is not known with certainty, but suppose that the collective judgment of economists is that the probability of moderate inflation is 0.5. and the probability of rapid inflation is 0.30 years. These outcomes for each state of nature (i.e rate of inflation ) for each investment are as&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Probability distribution for Two Invt. Alternatives &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;State of Nature    Probability(p1) Outcome(x1)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No inflation      Investment I   100&lt;br /&gt;Moderate inflation        200&lt;br /&gt;Rapid inflation        400&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No inflation     Investment 11  150 &lt;br /&gt;Moderate inflation        200&lt;br /&gt;Rapid inflation        250&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Analysis of these investments  can be made by calculating  and comparing the three evaluation statistics for each  alternative. The expected value U is an  estimate of the expected return for the investment. Because risk has been defined in terms of the variability is outcomes, the standard deviation S is a measure of risk associated with the investment. The larger the U the greater is the risk. Risk per rupee of expected return is measured by the coefficient of variation.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-5704865723264800544?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fSNljTINXFJUWk4QCPHA2B2S7E/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fSNljTINXFJUWk4QCPHA2B2S7E/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fSNljTINXFJUWk4QCPHA2B2S7E/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/5fSNljTINXFJUWk4QCPHA2B2S7E/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/T8VTA12gjOM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/5704865723264800544/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/define-risk-what-do-you-understand-by.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/5704865723264800544?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/5704865723264800544?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/T8VTA12gjOM/define-risk-what-do-you-understand-by.html" title="Define risk. What do you understand  by ‘Diversification ‘ of risk?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/define-risk-what-do-you-understand-by.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAMSXg-eip7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-7830863379164395305</id><published>2009-06-12T10:12:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:13:08.652-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:13:08.652-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="dealing with uncertainty" /><title>discuss any three methods of dealing with uncertainty.</title><content type="html">discuss any three methods of dealing with uncertainty. Illustrate with relevant examples .&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans.  Uncertainty is  a situation  where there is more  than one possible outcome to a decision but the probability of each specific outcome occurring is not known or event meaningful. This may be due to insufficient information or instability in the nature of variables. In extremes cases of uncertainty, the outcomes may be uncertainty  is necessary subjective.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Decision making under uncertainty:- &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this  care the probabili9ties associated with the   different state of nature  are unknown. Moreover, there  is no  previous  date of information available  which could allot  the probability  of the occurrence of states of nature. As such  they decision ,makes cannot  calculate the expected pay-off for the  course of action. The decision maker faces problem  when he desires to introduce new plan  of production. A number of decision criteria  have been  provided for decision making  under  such state of  nature. Each of these criteria makes an assumption about the extent to which a decision makes is an  optimist or pessimist. There exists another criterion for a decision maker who compromise between  optimism and pessimism. Hence “Decision criterion under uncertainty  depends on the attitude of the decision make. The  decision maker  may  choose  any one of the following&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Maxi min&lt;br /&gt;2. Maxi max&lt;br /&gt;3. Mini max Regret&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. Maxi min:-  The course of action that maximize  the  minimum  possible  pay-off  is selected. The decision  maker lists down the minimum outcome within each course of action and then  selects the strategy with the minimum number. This is also known as a pessimistic decision criterion  as it locates the strategy having  least loss.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suppose, the maximum  pay off of each course of action are&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a1 : 40        Since the course of action a4 has the maximum pay-off so the&lt;br /&gt;a2 : 42    decision maker will select this alternative.&lt;br /&gt;a3 : 44&lt;br /&gt;a4 : 46&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;2. Maxi max :- In this case the  course of action that maximizes the maximum pay-off is taken . The decision maker lists down the maximum pay-off associated with each  course of action  then selects that alternative having maximum number.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This may be called an  optimistic decision criterion as the  decision  decision         maker selects the alternative  of  highest possible gain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Suppose, the maximum  pay- off  each course of action  are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;a11  : 40  Since the course of action a4 has the maximum pay off so  &lt;br /&gt;a2 : 42           the decision  maker will select this alternative.&lt;br /&gt;a3 : 44&lt;br /&gt;a4 : 46          &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;3. Mini max Regret : The regret (i.e  opportunity loss) for each course of action are to be  calculated with reference to the list pay off  various alternative acts. Now  obtain  the maximum regret and hence select course of action with the minimum of the maximum regret values.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-7830863379164395305?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uso8OJnPkkbQYYh4bxJV-W9BDBo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uso8OJnPkkbQYYh4bxJV-W9BDBo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uso8OJnPkkbQYYh4bxJV-W9BDBo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/uso8OJnPkkbQYYh4bxJV-W9BDBo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/nFUHoJ6Urg4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/7830863379164395305/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-any-three-methods-of-dealing.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7830863379164395305?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/7830863379164395305?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/nFUHoJ6Urg4/discuss-any-three-methods-of-dealing.html" title="discuss any three methods of dealing with uncertainty." /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-any-three-methods-of-dealing.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEIMQHk9fCp7ImA9WxJXGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-6528179213735478081</id><published>2009-06-12T10:09:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T10:09:41.764-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T10:09:41.764-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Baumol’s model" /><title>Discuss the reliance of Baumol’s model of sales revenue maximization in the present  context?</title><content type="html">Discuss the reliance of Baumol’s model of sales revenue maximization in the present  context?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ans: There are many economists who have examined the objectives of the firms. In which are economists in Baumol.&lt;br /&gt;According  Baumol’s model of most managers will try to maximize sales revenue. There are many reasons for this like an example.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) The salary and other  earnings of managers are more closely related to sales revenue than  to profits.&lt;br /&gt;(2) Banks and financers looks at sales revenue while financing  the corporation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sales revenue trend is a readily available  indicator of performance of the firm. Growth in sales increases the competitive strength of the firm. However  in the long run, sales maximization  of profit maximization may converge into are objective.&lt;br /&gt;The  main objective of each of every firm is to earn maximum profits. Any  firm can  maximize  their profits by following methods. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) By increasing  sales revenue&lt;br /&gt;(2) By increasing  their capital investments&lt;br /&gt;(3)  By controlling risks of uncertainty of business&lt;br /&gt;(4) By decreasing cost of production etc.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, there are many  more objective except profit  maximization. Which can be&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1) Maximization  of firm’s growth rate&lt;br /&gt;2) Maximization of managers own  utility of satisfaction&lt;br /&gt;3) Making  a satisfactory rate of profit&lt;br /&gt;4) Long run survival of the firm and&lt;br /&gt;5) Entry – prevention and risk avoidance&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But  according  to Baumor’s model of sales revenue maximization, firm can increase his sale though increase in sales revenue most  firms have sidelined short-term profit as their objective firms are often found to sacrifice their short-term profit for increasing  the future long-term profit. Thus, for example, firms undertake research and development  expenditure, expenditure on new capital equipment or major  marketing  programmes which require  expenditure initially but are meant to generate future profits. The objectives of the firm  is this to maximize the present  of discounted value of all future profits and can be stated as:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PV (II)  =  n      II t&lt;br /&gt;        E   (1-r) t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PV  = present  value of all expected future profits&lt;br /&gt;II n  = Expected profit in 1,2   ------ n years&lt;br /&gt;R    = Appropriate discount rate&lt;br /&gt;T   = Time period&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; Assumed profit is equal to total  revenue minus Total cost, then the value  of the firm can also be rated as&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;             Value  of firm = n       Tr t – Tct&lt;br /&gt;    E    &lt;br /&gt;                                       t=1      (1+r) t&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This maximizing  the discounted value of all future profits is  equivalent to maximizing the value of the firm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; A careful inspection of the equation suggests how a firms manages and workers can  influence its value for example, in representatives work hard to increase its total revenues, while its production managers and manufacturing  engineers strive to reduce its total  costs. At the same time, its financial  managers play a major role in obtaining capital, and hence influence the equation, while its research  and development personal invent  and reduce its total cost.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In banking  sectors variety of loan  and financial help[s provided to the  various customers. But  Banks provide  it only those where, they can earn maximum returns of p0rofit by selling  their loans. So Banks  and financers look  at sales revenue while financing  the corporations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; From maximizing of sales revenue, their will be increase in the strength of the firm. So, sales revenue trend is a readily available  indicator of performance of the firm. Growth in sales increases the competitive strength of the firm.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; In the long run, sales maximization  and profit maximization may converge into one objective.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-6528179213735478081?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m8Hqrb2OT4o78mUc3shuNo7LOLc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m8Hqrb2OT4o78mUc3shuNo7LOLc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m8Hqrb2OT4o78mUc3shuNo7LOLc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m8Hqrb2OT4o78mUc3shuNo7LOLc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/kTymNnBG3gI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/6528179213735478081/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-reliance-of-baumols-model-of.html#comment-form" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/6528179213735478081?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/6528179213735478081?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/kTymNnBG3gI/discuss-reliance-of-baumols-model-of.html" title="Discuss the reliance of Baumol’s model of sales revenue maximization in the present  context?" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/06/discuss-reliance-of-baumols-model-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUMRHY6fCp7ImA9WxJQF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-3753232579323007219</id><published>2009-05-31T10:50:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-31T10:51:25.814-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-05-31T10:51:25.814-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Product  differentiation" /><title>Product  differentiation :</title><content type="html">According  to Prof. Chamberlin, one of the main feature of monopolistic competition  is product differentiation. Product differentiation  means that goods are close substitutes but are not homogeneous. They differ in colour, name, packing , size, quality etc. one gets variety of tooth pastes in a monopolistic market, namely, fortans, libaca, colgate, signal, choice etc. likewise there are different varieties of soft-drink, such as, compa cola, Thumps up, limca etc. These products are close substitutes, but at the same time they differ from  one another.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Main features of product differentiation:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Because of product  differentiation, goods are not homogeneous as in  perfect competition &lt;br /&gt;(2)  Product  differentiation is a real situation of the market.  These  goods are close substitutes.&lt;br /&gt;(3) Product differentiation may be both real and artificial.&lt;br /&gt;(4) Under  product  differentiation, producer gets the name  or brand of his product legally patented it means  that producer alone has the legal monopoly of producing  the patented product  under the given  name, design  etc. For example, maruti udyog limited  alone can  produce  maruti cars, Remington . Electronic Typewriter. These  firms  get the trade  marks of their  products  registered. No others firm  can use that mark on  its product. However , it can  produce close-substitute under another trade mark and thus complete with other sister firms.&lt;br /&gt;(5) Aim  of product  differentiation in to control,   price and increase profit . Product differentiation may increase  average cost.&lt;br /&gt;(6) According  to Chomberlin, product differentiation  satisfies peoples urge for variety. Hence  it becomes necessary to pay a little higher price.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Definition  of Product Differentiation:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; So for all above you can define according to Chamberlin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“ A general class of product is differentiated if only  sufficient basis exists for distinguishing  the goods ( or services) of one dealer from  those of another. Such a basis may be real of fancied, so long as it is of any importance whatever to buyers and leads to a preference for any  variety of the product over another”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Examples of product  Differentiation :&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Examples of product  differentiation are as follows. Like they forhans, cibaca , colgate, choice etc. Simillary in soft-disk such as  campa cola, Thumsup, Limca etc.&lt;br /&gt;So from  above example, this is clear that product  differentiationn menas that goods are close substitutes but are not homogeneous.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-3753232579323007219?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yTBbj8qgtE4C5mzY4nMO3bILUZE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yTBbj8qgtE4C5mzY4nMO3bILUZE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yTBbj8qgtE4C5mzY4nMO3bILUZE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yTBbj8qgtE4C5mzY4nMO3bILUZE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/cQ-PePwReuE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/3753232579323007219/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/05/product-differentiation.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/3753232579323007219?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/3753232579323007219?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/cQ-PePwReuE/product-differentiation.html" title="Product  differentiation :" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/05/product-differentiation.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUFR30-cSp7ImA9WxJQF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8241748837047620613.post-1266204203383009389</id><published>2009-05-31T10:49:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-05-31T10:50:16.359-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-05-31T10:50:16.359-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oligopoly" /><title>Oligopoly:-</title><content type="html">Oligopoly is a form  of market organization in which there are few cellars of a homogenous or differentiated product if there are only  two sellers, we have a duopoly if the product is homogenous, we have a pure oligopoly, if the product is differentiated, we have a differentiated oligopoly.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So we  can define  oligopoly as that&lt;br /&gt;“oligopoly is the form of market organization in which  there are few sellers of a homogeneous or differentiated product”.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oligopoly is the most prevalent form of market organization in the manufacturing sector of most  nations some oligopolistic industries in India are automobiles, primary aluminum, steel,  electrical equipment, glass, breakfast cereals, cigarettes some of these  production  like steel  and aluminum  are homogeneous, while others such as  automobiles, soaps and detergents are differentiated. Oligopoly  exists also when transportation corts limit the market area. For example, even  though  there are many cement producers in India, competition  in limited to the few local producers in a particular area.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources of oligopoly:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sources of oligopoly are generally  the same as for monopoly. That  is&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(1) Economics of scale may operate over a sufficiently large range of outputs as to leave only a few firms supplying  the entire market.&lt;br /&gt;(2) Huge  capital investments and specialized inputs are usually required to enter an oligopolistic industry like automobiles, aluminum, steel, and similar industries and this acts as an important natural barrier to entry.&lt;br /&gt;(3) A few firms may own a patent for the exclusive right to produce a commodity or etc to use a particular process.&lt;br /&gt;(4)  Established firms may have a loyal following of customers based on product quality and service that new firms would  find very difficult to match.&lt;br /&gt;(5) A few firms may own or control the entire supply of a row  material required  in the production  of the product and &lt;br /&gt;(6) The Government  may give a franchise to only a few firms to operate in the market.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The above  are not only the sources of oligopoly but also represent the barriers to another  firms entering the market in the long run.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8241748837047620613-1266204203383009389?l=managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVBb3pkAPiWVUkAJZBdTHv5ZVTw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVBb3pkAPiWVUkAJZBdTHv5ZVTw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVBb3pkAPiWVUkAJZBdTHv5ZVTw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/XVBb3pkAPiWVUkAJZBdTHv5ZVTw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~4/cp2W5mN4sG4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/feeds/1266204203383009389/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/05/oligopoly.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1266204203383009389?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/8241748837047620613/posts/default/1266204203383009389?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Ms-09ManagerialEconomics/~3/cp2W5mN4sG4/oligopoly.html" title="Oligopoly:-" /><author><name>Satish Raj Pathak</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://managerialeconomics09.blogspot.com/2009/05/oligopoly.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

