MTKilla The King

Updates Coming Soon.....

2012-02-19T22:07:00.001-06:00

I'm so sorry brothers and sister or (whoever is reading this blog) but I've been extremely busy lately, school, my business etc. That I havn't had time to update my blog as accordingly, but however I have already 5 articles that I have yet to publish and I will publish them soon. most likely I should have something up this week (next week coming up lol)

I have also not answered many emails, due to being flooded with them heavily and everyone knows I have multiple emails! until then stay tuned.

What is "African Consciousness"?.....

2012-01-10T03:14:00.001-06:00

What is African Consciousness? there exist so many different definitions for this ideal state of mind for someone of African descent to have. African Consciousness as defined by many is much complex then a single state of mind, it's a transitional state of mind, that allows those of African descent to have knowledge of themselves, from all aspects of their life, either from history, spiritual or religion. (Since you can be Conscious and still be Religious or Spiritual) But what I have been debating about is what makes "African Consciousness" more unique then someone who just happens to be "African" and "Conscious"? or perhaps being "African Conscious" is different then someone who is just "Conscious"? (I am still debating)

Since I have been questioning the "Legitimacy" of this ideal state of consciousness? I am convince that "Consciousness" does not guarantee you are "Intelligent"; and here is why, To be conscious one must be intelligent or have some form of "Intelligence", but being "Intelligent" which is simply defined by "Reason" alone is not necessarily a state of "Consciousness" so therefor Consciousness is not truly Intelligence. I think that "Consciousness" is simply based on "Perception" let alone, rather then Intelligence, I say this because one can be concsious of many things such as surroundings, people, objects, politics, religion etc. But this does not guarantee you have true knowledge about them (Intelligence) which is based on knowledge, and knowledge alone, whereas consciousness is rather rooted in "Theory" then in "Practice. For example people are conscious about government conspiracies, people also tend to speculate (Form theories). But however in reality most people have no "True" knowledge about the conspiracies, so in theory governments are known to plot conspiracies, but in practice no one really knows for sure (Unless there is verifiable evidence).

Often people confuse consciousness and intelligence (As I have done in the past) However there indeed exist a clear difference between the two, as I have shown. But I am trying to understand what is the difference between this ideal state of "African Consciousness" and how does it differ from just being "Conscious"; Because I now understand how easy it is for one to be conscious about problems within the world, but have no true knowledge about how they form, or give practical solutions to solving them. So I must once again question the legitimacy of not just "African Consciousness" but let alone the ideal state of "Consciousness" and how it is indeed not "Intelligence". Allow me to give an example of "Conscious" and "Intelligent" behavior, so there will not be any confusion.

My uncle has "Dementia" which is a form of Alzheimer's disease, he displays several traits of irrational thinking (Unreasonable) but this is only due to his disease, though in his state he is still conscious of his surroundings, and himself (Not fully) but he knows my name, my mothers name, my brothers and so fourth. He even remembers his own address, and phone numbers (Which is remarkable) he also have some memories that are intact, he also remember certain songs word for word. However he is unable to reason from his own will, he does not know to wash up, he does not know to brush his teeth or to use the bath room. (Unless we tell him or direct him) when he is in the bathroom, he remembers how to wash up, brush his teeth, and put on his clothes, and this isn't because he is in "Conscious" state, it's because he is still Intelligent enough to know these things, and he has not completely forgotten how to do these "Basic" things.

His conscious state is that he is indeed aware of these things, (but he will not do this unless we tell him to) however his intelligence enables him to do fulfill these goals, so by his intelligence alone, does not require him to be conscious of doing these things. So there is indeed a difference between "Consciousness" and "Intelligence". It is obvious that Intelligence, is a form of experience, knowledge, reasoning and memory, whereas "Consciousness" is a state that is not necessarily "Intelligence". Because the "Intelligence" is why there exists a "Conscious" state, but to be Intelligent one does not necessarily have to be "Conscious". So with my understanding of the ideal state of "African Consciousness" it is no different then regular "Consciousness" it just so happens, to be attached with the Pan-African ideals of the world and people of African descent. Thus we call it "African Consciousness". But as I stated before Consciousness is not Intelligence.

And to prove another point of why I believe Consciousness is not Intellligence, I will use the example of electronics such as a "Playstation" (Video Game Console) One can easily argue that a Playstation is not "Intelligent" because you are the player, who controls all the functions. But the argument can be dismiss because the Playstation is able to perform Intelligent tasks, such as playing a movie, viewing pictures, playing games, searching the internet, these are the functions that someone have programmed into this machine, but the system is able to act out on what it has been programmed to do without an available state of "Consciousness"; sure you can argue that I am the one performing these functions utilizing the system, but it does not dismiss the overall argument of how the system is able to perform intelligent functions it was programmed to do without an avaliable state of consciousness. There is nothing practical about applying attributes to a system with no state of consciousness such as saying "This should be", because the system is only able to act out intelligent functions as it has been programmed to do by it's programmer.

Now that I have gotten my 3rd example out of the way, I have now came to the conclusion that "African Consciousness" is no more or less valid then any form of "Consciousness" and it is not essentially "Intelligence" because it applys to different individuals and as such it could be utilize in many and different ways, and this state is not necessarily "Intelligence". Because it is known that many of us who proclaim "Pan-African" or "Black Nationalism" can be "Conscious" but are not very "Intelligent". We can profess consciousness but still do irrational things, we can profess consciousness about the foods we eat, sexual attraction, hygiene,clothing, religion etc. But still display a form of "Rational Ignorance" about our choices. (Making reasonable decisions for yourself but lacking in true knowledge) You can also be "Intelligent" without having a state of consciousness about these things, thus displaying just a form "Ignorance" (Lacking in knowledge) Hopefully readers can understand the huge difference, between Intelligence and Consciousness.

The "Problem" with "African Consciousness"

The problem with "African Consciousness" as defined by many, is the equation of "Intelligence" that is simply the defining factor of one being conscious, even if the individual is not truly intelligent about certain beliefs, religions, ideologies, politics, government etc. African consciousness as defined by many is basically grouping all "Africans" into an ideal state of view, and identifying solely based on "Perception", rather then "Knowledge"; what I am saying is for example, let us consider the following.

Brother A: Believes that consciousness is the defining factor for someone who whichs to understand his or her surrondings, and they must come to accept the harsh truths of reality if they are truly "Conscious". His state of Intelligence is being aware of governments, politics, race, sexual orientation, clothings, foods, etc.

Brother B: Believe that Intelligence is the defining factor for somone who which to understand his or her surroundings, and they must accept the harsh truths of reality only through "Intelligence". His state of Intelligence is only based on what he "Truly" knows simply through observation and practice, he does not need to be conscious to understand this.

However the following does not state that Brother A is "Less Intelligent" it further proves my point that even though Brother "A" is defining his ideal state simply as "Consciousness" he still have a state of "Intelligence" because he is aware that the following does exist, so this is not "Consciousness" this is (Intelligence), whereas Brother B, does not really need a "State" of Consciousness, because he acts off reason, (obervation) rather then "Perception". The state of "African Consciousness" as professed by many Pan-Africans is not "Intelligence" it is simply apart of "Intelligence" so therfor it is not the same. Which brings me back to my post about the "Conscious Community" and much of the irrational thinking many have displayed, when it comes to things such as "Politics", for example: some would say "Politics don't solve anything", in many theories politics are usless, however in practice politics can work. (Everything around us is politics)

African Consciousness, is not Intelligence, for it is only apart of intelligence (Perception) many African-Americans are "Conscious" that they are the descendents of slaves, but they are not Intelligent enough to know why. Many Pan-Africans are conscious of "Racism" but it is not "Intelligent" to "Believe" that every non-African is racist. So this further proves my point once again, that Intelligence is not Consciousness. (However this does not mean African Consciousness focus is Racism) African Consciousness as stated is just Consciousness, which the word "African" attached, but it does not gurantee "Intelligence". For I have stated and proved numerous times, that "Conscious" people "Believe" stupid and irrational things. But "Consciousness" is not a maeasure of "Intelligence" for only "Intelligence" is needed for a state of "Consciousness" and "Perception".

And in this ideal "State" of "Consciousness" I am sure it is safe to ask this Question once again, What is "African Consciousness? and How can Africans be "Conscious if there is no gurantee of us being "Knowledgable" rather then our own "Perception" of what exists?

On Another Note: Read this Article by Brother Wambui Mwangi, his take on "African Consciousness" is actually questioning the legitmacy of Africans state of "Consciousness". What is African Consciousness by the way?

Adressing my Critics.....and you BOOTLICKING ASS NIGGAS!!

2012-01-04T19:42:00.105-06:00

I understand my thinking is complex and many of you simple individuals can never follow my logic, and that is the beauty of being a philosopher, not everyone have the ability to understand intellect when they come into contact with a force of nondestructive intelligence and analytical skills. (The cockiness of this ass-hole is talking) Don't let the former throw you off, I have always been humble with my approach to obtaining knowledge, I am humble with my educational experiences, because I am hungry to learn more. I have no problems with changing my current views, this is what a philosopher does anyway; but what is important, is that I always think "Deep" and question things, that may be too "Simplified" to be deemed as the "Right" or considered the "Norm".

Many people have told me "You philosophize too much"; the fact that I philosophize so much, is the reason why I am able to construct and think critically, and understand certain beliefs, ideologies, and personal virtues. The fact that I am able to philosophize about the nature and complexity of life, is why I have obtained the knowledge of existence, and know the key to solving not only the problem of African people, but the problem with humanity as a whole, and the key to this is simply "Education" though I understand the paradox here, because those with education can use their knowledge for bad and good purposes. And the reason I know this is because I fucking philosophize, so if you do not agree then who gives a shit? life goes on and then you die,so I'll like to see you pathetic muthafuckas do a much better fucking job?

I am tired of people telling me "You think you know everything" it's not that "I" think I know everything, the problem is "YOU"..."THINK"..."I"..."KNOW"..."EVERYTHING". I am well aware I don't know everything, and If I did that would be fucking unreal and scary, me having an intelligent conversation and correcting someone when they are wrong does not have anything to do with thinking I am more "Intelligent"; because everyone is "Intelligent" in their own right, I have had many people who could be considered less "Intelligent" then me, correct me on various topics, studies and activities. I have also learned from everyone, including the dumb ass who tries to equate race with intelligence. I have learned from everyone, everything and everywhere, my ability to philosophize is why I am still trying to elevate my mind beyond all comprehension. What I seek is not an "Super Intelligent Evil Genius MindFucker" personality, but a mind that is able to utilize critical thinking, and superb analytical skills that is far beyond the so-called "Average" person could ever experienced.

Many of you have criticize my way of handling the issues of our "Nationalist Agenda" and have often said it's "Passive"; but what I would like to point out, is that the articles I have written about Nationalist agendas and perspectives, isn't any where on this blog to be found, so I don't have no idea what the fuck you are talking about, I have never went into concrete details about my plans or solutions that can help African people, I always ask for people to FUCKING EMAIL ME! because my views isn't anything "Passive", if anything they are very assertive and completely logical and scientific. The problem is my blog is not feeled up with "Kill Whitey" and all that other bullshit that plague other so-called "Pro-Black" blogs, forums and sites. I don't spend my day, searching on the Internet about crimes and murders white people are doing, I am worry about what happens in my own backyard, and what my people are doing to each other. In Chicago, a young brother was killed on 36th Halsted, over a pair of Air Jordan 11 concords, and guess who killed him? it wasn't a whitey, it was someone who looked like him? I wonder why? because most racial crimes happen within one's own ethnic group. Blacks kill more Blacks, Whites kill more Whites, Asians kills more Asians etc.

But you can't talk to these so-called "Revolutionaries" who are sitting back at home being a "Vegan" debating on what is truly "African" or what is not, or when their "Black Space God Alien" ancestors are going to arrive in 2012 of this year, you can't talk to them about economics, or politics and how we can utilize these methods of building and growth development within the communities, or form a social body that will give ourselves legitimate powers because their paranoia of white people, and "Government Conspiracies" (From which they have NO concrete evidence of) will always object and denounce reason, because they are not interested in anything that sounds too fucking intelligent, they are 1000% confident they'll win a race war, because "Africans were the first on the planet, and from the black wombman, came all the other mutants" TYPICAL shit I hear from most of them. They are confident they are gonna take the white man's cars, jets, submarines, arial craft, nuclear bombs and use it against them!

Some have even convince themselves that the only TRUE liberation for "People of color" on the planet is to mate with "White Women" to breed out the "Mutant Caucasoid", and here is the rationale for this, since everyone else on the planet originate from the original man and wombman (Africans) they are essentially apart of us, so having sex with white women, will not "Dilute" our blood, but strengthen the overall African population, because according to these Psedoscientific Afrocentrics and so-called "Master Philosophers" this is why a lot of Black men should seek out white women and mate with them. Thus would contribute to the end of White people, little do they know anything about how genetics work (But as stated you cannot convince many of them, with anything that requires them to think). Some of the critics have also pointed out my notion about "Supporting Black Women's feminism"...

See what these so-called "Revolutionaries" don't understand is that "African feminism" (Africana Womanist Feminism) has existed way before a confounded "Rome"; African women from Ethiopians, to Kemet has always implemented feminist elements throughout it's cultures. in West African civilizations such as the Ashante, and Yoruba women are seen as the natural equivalent to their male counterparts, and often HIGLY respected. (How's that for a slap in the face) In America, Black Women here, face a lot of sexual objectification from not only the dominated white male patriarchal soceity, but even from their own men (And this is mainly due to the Western influences upon both African men and Women within America); White women were facing sexual objectification and stereotypes from their own men, such as not being able to do what a man does, or their only place should be in the kitchen etc. Many Black Men took upon these typical male "American" views, and eventually such found it's way into the black communities, (Which still exist today within the American society). Women were often oversexualized, and not seen as people but as sexual creatures, Black Women's character has been distorted and oversexualized by caricatures such as the "Jezebel", and sadly many black women act into these stereotypes. No different then Black Men who are labeled as whore mongers and womanizers, and who actively protray these stereotypes.

So addressing the dumbasses, who disagree with me because I went into historical details about how black women became feminists, it's not necessarily a "European" thing, it's a "Woman" thing you would not know that because you do not understand women as HUMAN BEINGS! every race of female on this earth, will react to their surroundings, and often women are known to bond with each other and identify with each other, no different then men feeding their egotistical male nature. The misconceptions is that men mistaking women for being "Less Intelligent" then them and not seeing them as more then just sexual objects, but women in all societies have been oppressed and demoralized, the notion that black women becoming "Independent" and "Feminists" is the main reason for the destruction of the black community is what I've said before JUST FUCKING ABSURD!! and holds no true evidence.

Some have criticize me for taking it upon myself to focus on primarily "Black/African" people, which is just outrageous and utter stupidity to complain about, I am not Asian which is why I don't focus on Asians, I am not European which is why I don't focus on Europeans, I am African WHICH IS WHY I FOCUS ONLY ON AFRICANS, my mission is to identify the problems that exists with US, and how we can fix and correct those problems, I DO NOT FUCKING CARE ABOUT THAT WHITE MAN, HE DOES NOT CONTROL MY FUCKING THINKING, I AM A MENTALLY "LIBERATED NIGGA"; whitey does not control my ideologies, HE CONTROLS YOURS! which is why you create websites about him, which is why you conform to his ways of control, but not me; I have no intentions focusing my energy into what is whiteys next move, what for exactly? I belong to a race of people who obviously don't care about their own well being? who are obviously in love with fictious religious characters from a 3000 year old book that have been written over, over, and over; so what power do I really have against the white man's ways or his form of control? if I don't have a people to build with or unify with? What threat are we? we don't have an "Identity" (I am talking about a Political, and Economical Identify, NOT a Racial one) I am tired of saying the same shit over, and over, and over again.

The other's who criticize me, are the one's who just LOVE being in a weaken state, they love White People, they don't like to see anyone like me trying to only focus on the problems of African people, they often come in with this typical argument such as "Why not help the human race, why just black people" FOR THE LAST FUCKING TIME "HOMO SAPIENS SAPIENS" are NOT a FUCKING "RACE" they are a "SPECIES" do you know what a fucking species is? This isn't a science blog, but I will school your ass if I have to. Why should I be concern with everyone else, when everyone else isn't concern about black people?, hell black people isn't concerned about black people, but I happen to be a member of the African race, I am affected by the problems that plague my race. There exist a "Caste System" which is based on "Skin Color" and those who happen to be "Black" is put in a 4th level from moving upwards. And that is a HUGE problem for me, but see these BOOTLICKING ass niggas, will do whatever they can to make sure white folks remain in power, because according to these niggas "They ain't African" which is the usual uneducated response by these pathetic negroes, who sitting around buckdancing, clowning and cooning and showing their asses for massa. These are the same type of niggas, who'll sell you water if you couldn't walk to the nearest river.

They simply LOVE white people, they love that they are in power, these negroes are convince that whatever they do is only right when it is approved by whites, or perhaps their imaginary so-called "Heavenly Father"; these are same type of niggas, that will sell us their limited "Blackness" just to overthrow us and exploit our weakness to Whites. These negroes are a cancer, they often post stupid fucking comments or send stupid emails such as "Ewww why are you so pro-black", and my response to them are EWWWW WHY THE FUCK DO YOU LOVE BEING SO DAMN WEAK?. I swear these bootlicking ass Negroes are just sad and pathetic, they often try to come off as "Real Educated" with the same ol cliche statements such as "I am educated, with a bachelors" BLA,BLA,BLA,BLA, WHO THE FUCK CARES? your degrees don't mean shit, I HAVE A FUCKING DEGREE, AND? your point exactly? It has been verified that those with the so-called "Top-Knotch" degrees are some of the most dumbest muthafuckas on the planet; and the reason for this is simply because they are only educated in what they have been taught, or what they have chosen to learn "Specifically"; they haven't opted to seek other education in forms of thought and reasoning, they are just plain ignorant to much of the REAL world around them.

These buckdancing, tapdancing, kool-aid drinking, electric sliding, harlem shaking, massa loving negroes will do whatever they can to make sure Africans are never in a state of control over their lives, because the "Western" way is the "Right" way, and anything less isn't good enough. I swear these fools are something else smh. But you know what I am done ranting, and venting so if anything one of you so-called Revolutionaries and Buckdancing Negroes have anything else to say, comment or send a fucking email. But at the end of the day, You are lucky I am giving a response, but in reality I don't have the time.

THE KING HAS RETURNED.....

2012-01-04T14:33:00.000-06:00

After getting over my illness, I have much to get off my chest, reguarding some anti-intellectual, retards, bootlicking negroes, and arm-chair revolutionaries so stay tuned.

Extremely Sick, and Not Doing Well

2011-12-21T21:17:00.000-06:00

If you are wondering where I been, I am extremely sick, caught a winter cold, so if you left me any emails, or message and I have not responded it's due to my current illness, until next time stay tuned.

THE COLD-HEARTED TRUTH, Do NOT be a Martyr with a false CAUSE!!!!

2011-12-08T13:17:00.001-06:00

***CAUTION*** Reality is about to SLAP YOU IN YOUR FUCKING FACE!!!!

You know, I am a real deep thinker, and many times I can think about something up to 8 hours, watching and interacting with members of my "Race", It becomes clear that too many of us are asleep, maybe not fully asleep to everything around us, but the vast majority of us are absolutely oblivious to this current system of White Supremacy, Either we acknowledge that it exists, and don't care about freeing ourselves from it, or perhaps we enjoy this capitalistic system of drunken wealth if we can benefit from it; or perhaps we honestly do not know that it exists? but either way it doesn't change the fact that all three mindsets are equally oblivious to this system that is based on illusions of democracy, wrapped up in a bag called "Freedom", but inside this bag contains a racist ideological system that perpetuates systematic and economical exploitation and subjugation of different people globally.

But to make my point short, I ask this question to myself and that is exactly "What are we fighting for?" this is a deep philosophical and complex question every true and sincere "Pan-African" or Black Nationalist must ask themselves; it's a question that deserves a very perplexing answer. Because it's a valid question and there is much merit to it, I look around within the Black Communities and in parts of Africa, and notice that there are more people who are against Black Unity, then they are for it. If we are for it, it has certain limitations if it's only going to benefit someone on a personal level; those of us who are against it expresses this anti-unity behavior in indirect ways. This ranges from the way we interact with each other, our competitive nature amongst each other, the color complex, self-hate, good-hair vs bad-hair etc. All these things deserve deep thoughts, there is absolutely no cherry picking.

It seems to be the most common phrase I keep hearing amongst many of these so-called "Black-Americans" is the fact they are not "African" because they were not born there, they have so many reasons for why they are not African, but they are INDEED aware that there physical appearance is the product of someone who has lived in Africa, the mindset within the African-American communities has honestly got on my last damn nerve. We are like drones walking around, lacking self-awareness, crabs in a barrel complex, quick to tear one another down, trying to prove our worth and gain white acceptance; the murders that is rampant; little kids getting killed, and black women getting raped within our communities. It's funny how so many of us who are so-called "Consciously" aware keep pointing fingers towards the "White Man"; but not seeing the bigger end of the spectrum? However many of us are self-aware to something within this country, but the fact that we keep acting like everything has changed, and many of our living conditions are "Suitable" is completely beyond me.

We have been dumbed down by the system, every time I attempt to help a brother or sister; or shed some light, give knowledge rather in Columbia college, rather on the street, people are quick to turn their heads, whenever I bring up economical strategies, political ideologies that govern rational thought, nobody knows what the hell I am talking about? I make myself look like a complete fool trying to explain to individuals who don't know the damn difference between liberalism or conservatism; Why do many of us claim we are "Liberals" but cannot define what is so-called righteous and just? Why do many of us claim we are "Conservatives" when we don't have no traditional values to conserve?".

We honestly don't understand how politics work; if we did we would know how to use the system to our adavantage, and tricking the state or government into giving out checks every month is not a "Rational" way of thinking to outsmart the system. Something we cannot and never will do, Is outsmart a system that was implemented to keep you at a specific class; we have got to wake up from this kind of thinking. I hear so much within the black communities; from the young to elders alike, those of us who "Get It" needs to just accept this harsh cold reality, and that is our people in this country are "DOOMED"; we cannot undo over 300 years of sociological conditioning, it's impossible especially when there is only a handful of us in this country who utilizes our brain, especially when those of us who talk about such things within the black community is less then 10%.

Cooning has completely taken it's life-force to another level, there are more younger black women with blond hair then I have ever seen, There are more blonds in the black community then there are in the White community (Not literally of course); Black men are becoming more and more weak willed, mo-hawks, tight jeans all these people are followers, but no body is trying to be leaders; this life, this illusion we are living in is just sad, I honestly feel like I am the only one within this place that can see the bigger picture, and as I stated many times before we do NOT have another 50 years; we are completely ignorant and dumb to the system system, we are JUST lost; and this goes for the Negroes in the suburbs too, because they are no better. I keep asking myself why am I trying to help people, who obviously do not want any help. Those of us who are Pan-Africans and Black Nationalists it's time for us to consider these harsh truths and I am going to list them below.

1.Most blacks in this country will not dare question "Massa" (Because massa, have all the power)

2.Most blacks in this country has been indoctrinated with western perceptions of Africa

3.Most blacks in this country, diaspora and in the continent are broken beyond repair (Mentally)

4.Most blacks in this country are not interested in working together for a common interest (Hence our current condition)

5.Most blacks in this country have no interest in "Black Unity" (Because many of us don't know where to begin, when it's absolutely SIMPLE, it starts with ourselves)

6.You cannot and will not reach everyone. (It will be futile and absurd to try and "Save" everyone just because they so happen to have "Black" skin, and is part of the same race as you; I'm a firm understander of the "Lesser the more stable")

7.We need to just up and leave (This is the only rational and viable solution, if only 9% of us get it so be it, that is all we need)

8.Negroes love this capitalist system, because we have been consumed by greed, but are the most broke muthafuckas on the planet.

10. Many of our brothers and sisters in Africa and in the diaspora, do not have any interests within Pan-Africanism. You cannot convince different cultures, and kingdoms that they are the "Same"; or in the same "Condition".

11.We have been trained to just "Go to school & get a good paying job" (which is not gonna cut it for us as a collective, the issue is much more complex then our own selfish desires.)

12.Most Blacks in this country are Anti-Intellectual. (Our lack of unity is evidence of that)

14.Most African people in the world do not understand or care to understand what "White Supremacy" is and how it functions, and how they are manipulated by it.

15. It is impossible to change black people abrahamic beliefs, Judeo-Christian and Islamic etc, they are a conquered people, you cannot remove over 1,400 years of brainwashing in a spec of a time, we essentially are deeply rooted and spiritual people, it has always been a part of us, so belief in our conquerors religions just help reinforce what we have already believed in. (Hence, us mixing traditional African beliefs with Christianity and Islam) I.E see (Senegal, Nigeria, Gambia, Angola, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Kenya etc)

16.We DO NOT want to UNIFY, it is our natural right to "Self-Preservation" so differences isn't anything new to African people or any other race of people, however we seem the be the only one's who have such a problem with our Unity, we generally just don't give a damn; or we are not serious, or we don't know where to start.

17.Black Men and Women, are not Intellectually dependent; our so-called "Gender War" is a prime example of how we have been played into thinking in a "Western" perspective when it comes to our suitable mates.

We keep talking about "Fighting for the cause" what cause exactly? there is no real good legitimate cause we can really fight for, because we don't have "Legitimate Power" all the power we have has been used and abused, the church and religious sectors in the black community, use whatever power they have to suppress our thinking, maintain control over the politics and accumulate a huge cache of funds. Our so-called "Leaders" are only interested in what they "Understand" instead of what they need to KNOW, talking about racism, and white cops beating a black man, is not obtaining legitimate authority, we must do what the Asians have done; they focus on the "Politics" they understood the "Politics" and they have utilize the "Politics" to their own advantage, now in return are able to control their portion of economics and capitalize off anyone (Especially us). Everyone is able to play monopoly with us, but yet we are still stuck on "Go" and yet to make our way to "Boardwalk".

The Conscious Community, absolutely annoys me (Not all of them, of course) but as I have laid out before my personal opinions about many of them. It must be brought to the readers attention once gain, the conscious community are not all that "Intelligent' as they make themselves out to be. a lot of them attaches the title of "Intellectual" to their personal advantage and self description without having a true understanding of what an "Intellectual" means. An intellectual is someone who is able to utilize inductive, and deductive reasoning, someone who is able to use intelligence to understand or observe a person, place or thing. An "Intellectual" is usually a "Philosopher"; there are not too many philosophers within the "Conscious" community. if so what sane philosopher would tell a whole group of people to not get involved within the "White Man's politics" or "The Occupy Wallstreet movement"? when they are affected by such systems and ideologies?

That isn't someone who is an "Intellectual"; that is someone who is a "Cynic" and a "Naive" individual, this way and form of thinking is not "Conscious"; for in order to be "Conscious" you must be "Intelligent"; talking about being a vegan, and our "Spiritual" being is not going to get the job done, why is it we are always talking in tongues? why is it we are always looping in some divine mystic perception of reality with our lives? are we that damn pathetic? I don't care about "Vegan Talk", I don't care about "Spiritual Talk" and I am damn well tired of hearing about these "Black Space God Aliens" coming to save us in 2012; what the fuck does any of this have to do with the social, economical or political advancement of African people? how the fuck are we thinking about some Black Aliens from 800 million light years away, and equating it to the shit we are dealing with now? we need to stop talking about IRRELEVANT SHIT!!! and get practical with our planning and strategies! THE SHIT IS SO FUCKING SIMPLE!! if you want solutions? here's my fucking email mtkillatheking@hotmail.com, I have the whole plans mapped and laid out, I have studied extensively night and day, even without fucking sleep! WHERE ARE ALL THE SMART AND INTELLIGENT MUTHAFUCKAS!!!!!??!!?!?

I am not done yet; I don't see the progression, even after all the events I have attended out of curiosity I have gotten nothing but lectures, about the same shit I have read over and over and seen Youtube clips of. I have been apart of many associations but they are not all what they are cut out to be, they are either bent or stuck on the perception of becoming "Kemetian" and "Cushitics" (Though ALL or MOST of these fools are of West African descent); I have tried to understand many of them, and so far I have found absolutely nothing but logical fallacies surrounding their thinking?; you cannot equate business or doing business with someone who happens to not be "African", if so you are automatically labeled a "Sellout" from these conscious "Kemetic" dummies, just because you need some money in your pocket, or trying to get your business started or getting into a "Specific" school, maybe it had never occurred to many of them, that you might be utilizing various resources to YOUR ADVANTAGE!?

Because in order to be "Pro-Black" you must be absolutely Anti everything that is Non-African, everything you do must automatically generate and receive approval by the "African Elite" and their imaginary political power and ridiculous Kemetic names, but how does this mean you think independently for yourself? how does this not equate to a "Group Think" mentality amongst those who deem themselves as "Conscious"? This way of thinking isn't "Black Nationalism" and it's damn sure no where near close to "Pan-Africanism", I call this way of thinking "DMS" (Dumb Muthafucka Syndrome) because this seem to be an epidemic in the black community, and with us globally. I am just tired of the weakness, the self pity, the self hate, and lack of self-awareness, us black men and women are completely invisible in this world and society, and yet we have strive not to do anything about it, we tried in the past during the 20's onto the early 70's but after that I guess we have just given up? I guess we have just decided that our place is to be at the bottom of the feeding table collecting scraps and crumbs from massa's plate, I guess we have just decided that we are absolutely no good but for entertainment purposes, and trying to "Look" good.

Our Ignorance, is why we have been stuck in this position for so long, our lack of knowledge when it comes to the White Supremacist system and it's agenda has confuse us, so in return we are confused by everything else that surrounds us. If we try to understand the system, it further confuses us because we have not studied or attempted to study it's nature and observe it's characteristics. What is there really to die for? who to die for? our people are afraid of death, many of us are not willing to die for something far greater then ourselves, many of us are too attached to life, and value it too much. Or perhaps we still are not willing to accept the situations we have been place in, and the caste system that attacks us on both sides of the spectrum, we are in deep shit and It actually pains me to see what is going to happen to us in the next 50 years and where would we be?

I don't fear for my people because we are trying to be accepted by everyone, I fear for my people because we are trying to become everyone, we have not self-observed ourselves and questioned the nature of our OWN existence. The cold-hearted truth is that time is running out, and the African race will not survive any longer, the birth of a new era will come, but when will we take advantage of what our most prize possession? which is our "Brain"; right now our backs are against the wall, I cannot pull out now and think about "What if's" I am all about finding our "What is"; I am about defining what truly exists rather then what I "Think" exists, we don't have any more time something must change, I cannot bail out now, but the reality is all too real you will die sitting around worrying about the plight of a whole group of people who are not even on the same page as you, you would die with regrets knowing you could never satisfy your own beliefs and your own ethics. What is the point of dying for something that is not real? to itself what is the point in dying for a cause that doesn't truly exist?

What is the point in dying for a group of people that is broken beyond repair? my great great great great grandfather tried? his son tried, his son tried, his son never tried, his son tried and now I am trying? but the reality is all to real, so why be a martyr without a true cause? I am still trying to figure out the complexity of this question? I am still talking to myelf, I am still pondering about the nature of my existence as it pertain to the existence of African people? what is it's purpose? since with life you must give it purpose so there exists a reason why you are here to exist? or perhaps what you can contribute with your existence whether your actions are just or unjust? what is the true nature of your existence? I still have not found mine, and it's not everyday that I am confused. but however I am confused by the complexity of this question, until I find a rational answer.

I have yet to see.....

My Problem With The "Field Nigga" Caricature......

2011-11-29T23:21:00.003-06:00

Once again, I find myself always questioning the context of social labels; especially how it relates to the African people within this country and throughout the globe. Something that seems to be a popular terminology that differentiates amongst a certain social class of Blacks, is one being defined as a "House Nigga" and the other being defined as a "Field Nigga". The problem I have is not the use of the word "Nigga" (Which is Black in Portuguese) but the use of the word "House" and "Field", neither one of these terms would be endeared intellectually, so I took it upon myself to question the nature of it's context, essentially the definition of a "House Nigga" is a man or woman of African descent who is subordinate to Whites, he/she caters to the white will, and the white supremacist agenda, during the days on the plantation, whites had a special "Negro" who they consider to be better then most, depending on how much they respected their master, some house slaves could be considerd "Indentured Servants" at some point, some were even paid wages.

The definition of a "Field Nigga" is defined simply as the rebellious slave who was the slave owners least favorite; these forms of slaves were mostly used for production, I.E (Wageless Labor); however according to deep research and history, many if not most of the slaves who were strays actually worked in the house and on the field as well. But enough about the history between the two terms, let's get into the philosophical aspects of this terminology. My position is to prove to you (The reader) why being even a "Field Slave" is as worse as a "House Slave" and here's why with a simple answer....YOU ARE STILL A MENTAL SLAVE!

Those of us who profess the quote "I am a field nigga, y'all are house niggas" trust me being a "Field Nigga" isn't anything one should quote, or take pride in being, because essentially you recognize yourself as a "Slave"; so at some logical point one must come to a conclusion based on the philosophical nature of it's existence. If anything, why would we profess we are "Field Niggas"? if anything working on the field you are considered lowest of the low, there was absolutely nothing to take pride in being a "Field Nigga" let alone a "House Nigga" because both of these individuals are "Mentally Enslave".

If someone profess themselves as a "Field Nigga" then they must accept the fact, they are mentally enslave to a certain point; and whites still have control over your thinking process, if anything I am not a "Field Nigga" but what I will say is that I am a "Liberated Nigga" because once you are educated, with the knowledge of self, there is absolutely no way, I would profess that I am a "Field Nigga"; because the right to knowledge is the right to obtain liberation mentally, those without knowledge of self will never understand or obtain this liberation.

How can one deem himself as "Conscious" yet still profess to be that of a "Field Nigga"?; most field slaves were not rebellious as many believe, they were actually ordained with a form of "Inferiority" over themselves where they equated and placed whites above them, absolutely no different then the house nigga caricature they were given special privileges but still revered whites as "Superior". There is absolutely nothing logical about the field nigga term; if anything it stills places us in a "Inferior" status; which still caters to the "White Supremacist" agenda and ideology; once you have the knowledge, an educated mind will uplift from the mental process of captivity and enslavement and opt to seek physical freedom with the knowledge he/she have obtained.

Harriet Tubman for example; she quoted "I freed 1000 slaves, I could have freed 1000 more if only they knew they were slaves".

This quote further proves my point, that there is actually 3 forms of classes, if anything 3 forms and types of "Niggas".

1. House Niggas
2. Field Niggas
3. Liberated Niggas

The Liberated Nigga, is the most intellectually defining out of all 3 classes, because the individual who have obtained this knowledge of of his/her existence opt to seek freedom from a revolutionary standpoint, this is completely different then the house nigga and the field nigga who have absolutely no TRUE knowledge of his/her enslavement. Essentially the Liberated nigga, could be an ex-house nigga, or ex-field nigga, many times both, he would be an ex-slave who took his freedom, he does not ask about his nature, he does not ask to be "Free" he essentially takes his own freedom, because he have found the knowledge installed within himself and the nature of his existence, and his natural born right to freedom.

The field nigga, may be aware of his status as a "Slave" but yet make no opportunities to seek physical freedom, because his mind has been implemented with the concept that he is "Inferior"; so how can one find self-endearment with labeling themselves as a "Field Nigga"? I would rather be neither the house nigga, or the field nigga, because it further displays my inability to be intellectually independent, capable of using abstract reasoning, critique myself, self-observe, identify and explain my surroudings and situation.

The field nigga, may display a form of "Rational Ignorance" the rational part is identifying the fact and modes that he is enslaved, but the ignorant part is "Participating" in his enslavement, by not opting to seek physical freedom, so he is still enslave mentally. The House nigga, is aware of his status and his opportunities (Which has limits); his rational status is taking advantage of the opportunities that has been granted to him by his master; his ignorance is still participating in his enslavement, and not taking control of his life, so he is still enslave mentally. The Liberated nigga, is beyond all means conforming to the masters orders of authority, because he seeks his freedom, he takes his freedom, and he has no regrets and is willing to die and not compromise if his freedom is being threatened, he is now in complete control of his life mentally and physically.

The house nigga, is no more lower then the field nigga, only in status (Which has it's limits) but personally they are comparable, intellectually they are comparable; but they do not come close to the status of being a "Liberated" nigga, because they have bathed in a tub of ignorance, and instilled with an inferiority complex. Whereas the "Liberated" nigga, have one goal, one ideology and one strategy and that is to take his natural born right to freedom, by any means necessary.

Pan-Africans who are 100% against "Capitalism"....Yeah about that?

2011-11-28T00:14:00.003-06:00

Let me tell you, I have never in anyway fully said or promoted the abolishment of "Capitalism" ENTIRELY though it can be a good idea, depending on what "Economy" you are living in or perhaps what "World/Planet" you are living on. though I am a "Socialist" I understand and have studied the pros and cons with both of these ideologies, but I am not in anyway about to debate and discuss the pros and cons on capitalism and socialism. What I am here to talk about is many of my fellow Pan-Africans; who profess that they are 100% against capitalism?

The problem seems to be, is that many of my fellow Pan-Africans might not have a good understanding of what "Capitalism" truly is, it's absolutely more then "Capitalizing" and "Profiting" it has become a way of the modern world, specifically in the "Western World" where much of all production is privately owned; hence it's term "Capitalism".

Now I was having a discussion with a few friends of mine, who happens to be Pan-Africans as well; we begin to discuss the current economical situation within this country, and primarily shifting our focus towards African countries such as Nigeria (My second home lol) and Ghana, we even begin discussing the economical functions of such countries like Liberia, a friend of my friend brought up the notion, that we must find a "way" to truly abolish "Capitalism" from Africans in America, and those throughout the diaspora.

I begin to question on will completely "Abolishing" capitalism be a good thing? he began to talk in circles never really laying out examples on why we should entirely implement a full blown "Socialist" body; if we are to achieve some form of "State Sovereignty"; though I highly doubt in this country; because African people have barely a good understanding of these various ideologies within this country let alone a good idea of what "State Socialism" means, he obviously had no clue as well.

But to get right to the point; if we are for the economical improvement of our people, investing and starting businesses which many Pan-Africans and Black Nationalists are for, isn't that not a form of "Capitalism"? isn't creating "Employment" not a form of capitalism? if anything this is ENTIRELY Capitalism. If we are to start a businesses within the "Black Community" or perhaps throughout the globe; we would need to "Invest" once we invest into "Private Properties" we would be the sole owners of this property; we would need to produce, but of course we would need to hire "Workers" to produce these "Goods" to begin with, if we are talking about "Buying Black" what do you call that exactly? sounds like "Capitalism" to me? and this is why I can never be 100% entirely against capitalism, because if we are to build economically that is going to take some money; we can't build simply off of communistic essentials or socialist based ideologies; there is not a nation founded on this planet that has never constituted a form of "Capitalism" to help build it's economy.

Talking about the abolishment of "Capitalism" is not "Socialism" as he was saying, what he is saying is essentially "Communism" which many people seem to get confused with. Communism is about the abolishment of classes and a stateless society where there is absolutely NO private ownership of goods and properties; having a communist country or state for that matter is like a "Black Utopia" this is completely different then "Socialism' specifically "State Socialism" lol I have no idea how he could have gotten this confused, unless he didn't know what he was talking about begin with; specifically talking out his ass.

For some odd reason, whenever you spew a socialist ideology people are quick to label it as communism, and for some reason many people seem to think that socialism is communism; since communism has been use to control a socialist society before I.E (Soviet Russia, though heavily debated about it's legitimacy). I think some people really need to read up on Karl Marx's the "Communist Manifesto"; gives a good insight on communism and how it would be used, and it's arguments against capitalism.

But back to the point; whenever I have a discussion about this; no one really seems to understand what socialism and capitalism is, I think it's the "Names" that get people; Capitalism helps promote "Wage Labor" and competition people who get their asses up to work everyday are benefiting from capitalism, I own a business free-lance graphic designing; that in itself is a form of "Capitalism" I profit from work that I do for others so I'm getting paid for doing a specific job, Socialism is not about the ending of "Wage Labor" as he had profess, that is 100% Communism; once again an entirely different ideology from "Socialism". If the Black Community is in dying need of "Money" as he had stated, how would this work in a "Communist" based society? because what would be the need of money in a communist society to begin with? since we don't have to purchase anything?...LMFAO!!!

We could do work for free entirely, there is no money to be made, we produce goods for each others just for the hell of it; we can live wherever we want; take whatever we want; so once again where does "Socialism" play within this? well if we were talking about the redistribution of "Wealth" to solve the general good of the people's problem then yes; Socialism is not about the abolishment of classes, if anything Socialism is nice and concrete with these following words "Hey, you have too much money, you don't need that much, this can go to schools and poor children"...lol

But we know damn well that people are not that fucking nice, Implementing a full blown "Socialist" body can create even more inequalities, just like capitalism; these two ideologies are not perfect, because what we must understand is that every single individual has a desire to be different then the next. If we are to "Profit" simply on a "Socialist" based ideal, then yes it could work, this form of "Socialism" is called "Market Socialism" known to some as "Social Capitalism"; which is simply joint-owning properties, the money that is made will be redistributed to workers or the public in general for the good of all.

If anything, he may have been talking about this form of "Socialism' but I know he was not when he talked about the "End of wage labor" then went on to talk about "Making money"??....LMFAO!! sometimes I just don't know who to talk to; because I may have went in over my own head, I hate when I have discussions like this, and people ask me all the questions, then try and turn it around and say "Well that's what I am saying, I just worded it in a different way" well.... that's one hell of a way to word it different, you gave it a complete different ideology, that isn't anything close to it's TRUE form.

But most Pan-Africans, are entirely Socialist or Marxist/Communist; I believe there are some who are even Capitalist; I think if we are to actually have any hope in succeeding in our goals, we must function entirely as a unit, so we can form some kind of "Body Politic"; but who knows maybe I might just be in over my head as I stated previously. :/

I Honestly Dont "Hate" anybody.......Why Should I?

2011-11-18T13:40:00.005-06:00

You know, I honestly have to question the intellectual legitimacy of individuals within the "Conscious Community" or those who proclaimed themselves for the "Cause" (Whatever that really fucking means?); for it is already known that my solutions differ then many of those within the "Conscious Community" I am more of a philosophical solutionist, and strategist I am studying extensively about politics and governments, so in return I can utilize what form of political power we have and to use it to our advantage; simply put our best route to obtaining liberation is only within our minds, but however many of the "Militant" Pro-Black Revolutionists and Extremists begs to differ.

They believe in solving the problem of African people, is simply by "Killing Whites" and "Hating them"; some have even went so far to ordain some form of ideology of "Black Supremacy" which does not exist; because it has no foundation and no contributor to it's legitimacy, thus leaving a door open to systematic exploitation by outside forces. This imaginary "Black Supremacy" that many of them keep ranting about, is not Pan-Africanism, as far as I am concerned it's not essentially "Black Nationalism"; it's a form of hatred that is not rooted in rational thinking, and political thought. You cannot be an advocate for something far greater then yourself and allow your philosophy and ideologies to be flawed in "Reasoning"; and this is where I differ then "Most".

I will not tell anyone that we don't have any "Chance" in the American political system, because in reality we do; we are just so happen to not "Understand" it's entirety and how it works and functions, though personally I do not believe we will obtain a state of "Sovereignty" within this country; just the thought of it is completely unrealistic, and is completely outdated and needs 'Modern Revamping" and employed with new methods, this is how old outdated ideologies will evolve to suit the modern era.

You don't talk strategies and methods, with the same ol outdated 1960's concepts; it's not smart and not logical, but whenever I come across a brother or sister about a discussion on politics and governments or anything that deals with social and economical problems that plauge the African people globally, they will always assert something like "Fuck those crackas, or kill them mutants"; I personally believe that this is a form of running away from the "Problem" that is at hand, we can discuss about killing whites people, or "Cracka Babies"; but what about the millions of black children dying on our streets everyday? who is behind the trigger? who is raping our women within the communities? why is it we have such a low effort in being educated on things that are necessary and fundamental to this current society and world around us? killing the white man, will not help us obtain liberation, it just prove that we are not intellectually reasonable and we are only governed by the conflictions of our past and the emotions which play into it. (Which is one of the main problems with black/African people) We are too damn emotional; we let our emotions define our thinking and reasoning skills.

"Hatred" is a form of emotions you have obtained from an individual or thing, you developed these emotions of "Hatred" simply because you are angry, being angry and allowing yourself to be focus entirely on one group of people, will only allow further exploitation from outside forces, In other words what I am saying is, "Hating" a group or race of people, you are allowing your emotions to be exploited and taken advantage of, and this is all due to the fact that you "Care" about these individuals. You care enough about them to "Hate" them; this is how they function and feed, they feed off of emotions. And this has been the problem with all "Oppressed" peoples; as I recall many of our intellectuals, leaders and freedom fighters, never profess sole hatred of other individuals but only profess "Self-Determination" and "Self-Love"; I cannot understand how one would deem himself as "Conscious" without having a conscience, or philosophical knowledge of existence?.

If you are so-called "Conscious" then you must automatically be intelligent, intelligence is having the ability to display abstract thoughts, critical thinking, analytical reasoning etc. These are all forms of intelligent, "Being Conscious" is not rooted in hate, and you cannot be entirely conscious if you "Hate"; if anyone begs to differ prove me wrong philosophically? I will accept your challenge. Right now, I am not thinking about the "White Man" because they do not control my thinking, I have no set of emotions or distaste for them; As far as I am concerned the knowledge I have obtained from all people, from difference races; defines my intellectual reasoning; The love I have for my people is the only emotions that are rooted solely based on Intellect.

I am simply worrying about Black Issues, I do not care about the sole destruction of White Supremacy; the only thing we should be worrying about is freeing ourselves from it (ONLY). Talking about the death of White Supremacy, is like talking about the death of something that's traditional; it's not going anywhere too soon, and I have also lately been questioning the legitimacy of "White Supremacy", and it's ideal concepts of Whiteness; I think the issue is much more complex then solely base on being European (But that is another article) But back to OUR issues, since one would argue "Well the white man is our issue", Yes to a "Certain" extent they are, but they do what they want BECAUSE WE ALLOW IT; and this is how we are continually exploited by other groups, is because we allow it.

While "Whitey" is constructing empires, and figuring our how they are going to continue their global expansion for the next century (With the help from others of course) we are still stuck on trying to define what is "African Consciousness"; the word I myself have a problem with, because it loops all Africans together as if we are defined by only one "Hierarchical" thinking process (Which is shown that we are wayyyyyy far from); how does "African Consciousness" differentiate on just "Consciousness"? what is the sole difference? the name "African" attached at the beginning of the word? does that automatically generate and constitute positive thoughts? (I believe that is an important philosophical) question to ask. Because something needs to be defined when we talk about "African Consciousness" because I don't think Black Space god aliens from another planet, is something a "Conscious" individual should be worried about or connecting it with the philosophical aspects of political ideologies.

But I have also notice is whenever many of the radical pro-black brothers and sisters, profess their ideologies; it's always something that deals with only one pattern of thinking. If we are talking about Nation building, understand that everybody plays a huge role within doing this, if we are only focus on who have the best get up attired, traditional names, ankhs, and is a vegetarian then we are clearly deluded; this is not reality especially for a people who are well diverse in thinking, religious beliefs and political beliefs.

I have come to found out that everyone plays a significant role within structuring a political regime; despite their religious, sexual orientation, gender etc. This is how solely a nation functions, it functions off the people who give it power, solely this power is the legitimacy of the "General will" which will give a government supreme authority over it's individuals. If we are to build a supposed "Nation" or reinvent our own identity and take our own political name, then we must do this based on "Unity"; this does not involve worrying about who wears their hair a certain way, who is more religious, or who is more "Conscious"; it functions simply off the people from whose it's body politic is made up from.

I don't understand why don't many within the CC understand the complexity of this Issue, true enough I was hard on religion; but at the end of the day, I cannot undo over 1,500 years of mental brainwashing, especially on a whole continent full of people, and in the Diaspora, it's not realistic; religions have practically been intergrated into such cultures; it's essentially considered part of it. and apart of it's people, telling the Senegalese/Wolof people that Islam was forced on them, is like telling a child to not suck his thumb at 5 months, you'll get absolutely no where. All this irrational thinking, that many have been doing, makes me fear even worse, and my long strive to find like minded intelligent individuals who are only "Philosophers" and "Rationalists"; is going to be tough; because so far I am not finding too many these days. I guess it's just a matter of time.

Do African-Americans have "Ghetto" Names?

2011-10-24T15:18:00.003-05:00

I keep hearing this statement from various people, whether black or white, and it really annoys me; how can someone have a "Ghetto" name, something that reflects a "Living Condition" I touched on this subject in my article, African-Americans and the Ghetto Stigma. I was on the bus on my way home from school earlier, and these two young sisters were talking about a friend of theirs who named their child "Shaquelle" I guess that is how you spell the name, I am not sure?. But anyways to get to the point, one of the girls stated "Why does she always name her kids those ghetto ass names?" I asked myself just exactly what does naming a child with a "Ghetto Name" really means? So I have decided to look into the history of naming children within the African-American community, and where does the roots of names such as Daniqua, Shaniqua, Anickqua, Tyniecka, Laniqua, Rakelle, Lochelle, etc. comes from, and as obvious it comes from African-Americans "African origin" SURPRISE SURPRISE!!!

That is right, When African slaves were brought to America, they put their own spin on the "English" language, some linguistics teachers would refer to as "African-American Vernacular Language" or perhaps what is European coined and widely accepted as "Ebonics". Which is just another way, for individuals to demean the African population within in America, by asserting "African-Americans don't speak proper English" which brings to question just what exactly is "Proper" English? (That's another subject I will be discussing later)

But anyways let me make my point precise, so it can touch those who are "Intellectually Challenged" XD

Let's take a look at these names, that are more European associated in origin such as these "English" names

Bernie, Thomas, Mark, Jacobs, Adam, Jamie, Kevin, Walter, John, Casey etc.

Now let us take a look at some names that are "Asian" associated in origin such as these Japanese, and Chinese names.

Japanese: Tokoyama, Kaneshiro, Hayashi, Chiba, Kazuya, etc. Chinese: Han, Pai Lei, Pak Ho, Yeun Biao, Ziyi Mai etc.

Now let us take a look at some names that are "African" associated in origin such as some Nigeria, Congo, and South African names.

Nigerian: Ejifor, Adewali, Abaeze, Owoichio, Chintiwele etc. Congo: Vanda, Zayela, Neuchi, Jettie etc. South African: Imelda, Thoalona, Motene, Baruti, Kefilwe, etc.

Now as you can see within each name it reflects a particular "Culture", Racial or Ethnic groups "Identity" the names gives relation to history and belonging, etc.

The point that I am making, is just exactly what is a "Normal" name? are all these names normal in a "Westernized" society?; is a Japanese name normal within a Korean society? So why Is it when African-Americans name their children in a similar fashion that reflects a common "Culture" it is criticized and called not normal?; That is absurd, and we have indeed brought into this mentality by saying we are naming our kids "Ghetto Names" you cannot name a child a name based off a living condition, unless that childs name is simply called "Ghetto"; but how can a name that reflects a person identity be defined under a specific living condition? this is nothing more then ideal concepts that have been installed within a White Supremacist system; why should African-Americans look to Mark, or Becky to name their kids?

One can argue that mark, or adam are not "Normal" names for a person of African descent; but according to history one would beg to differ, as you have adopted your conquerers language, religion and his/her names; so if African-Americans are still criticized for naming their children "Antaniqua" or "Lavarion" this just goes to show you how far people have equated anything that deals with "Whiteness" is perceived as normal.

What Is The "Average" looking "African-American"?

2011-10-03T16:16:00.000-05:00

I wonder exactly what does the "Average" African-American look like? because so far I keep hearing this, from whites and blacks alike, the whole topic goes back to what I discuss in the "Typical African", And the reason for this is I have heard these specific statements from various people below.

"Africans and African-Americans don't look alike, have you ever seen an African they are dark"

"When our Ancestors arrived in America they were all the same complexion, we are not we multiple shades"

"of course africans don't look like african americans take your average african and place him next to the average african-american big difference"

"The average african-american is lightskin brown"

"the average african-american have clearer more sharper features"

Anyways, I am sure you get the point, now keep in mind "Most" people who say these things, are the one's who have never set foot within an African country, Their whole perception is from the immigration of African immigrants into the United States. But these people have absolutely no idea, about the variations of skin tones in Africa, for example: My college friend adeyemi who is of the Yoruba people, but was born here in the united states, was mixtaken continously as "African-American" (Which she is, since she is just an American of African descent) but no one had absolutely no idea she was "Yoruba" because she does not fit the "Typical" African perpective, or moreso the typical yoruba perpective, which is possessing extremely dark-skin, she is actually a dark-brown complexion she also lives within the African-American community she and her family identitfy with other African-Americans, no ones knows that her parents are from Nigeria unless you hear them speak.

They dress like any other "African-American" and have even adopted mannerisms similar to African-Americans, so they just want to "Fit" in, and according adeyemi when she was young she was harrased in school and called an "African bootyscratcher" by other "African kids who looked like her" she didn't understand why people would talk about her parents accent, because to her everyone else accent was weird, (Keep in mind she was born in America with the same "Accent" many African-Americans have adapted) she talked about not fitting in because her parents "Stood out", so her parents decided to blend more in. What's funny is that adeyemi saw other black kids in schools as "African" she said they looked no different then her , the second thing that gave her away was her "Name". So my question is exactly how is it other blacks and white americans, are able to have this "Special" ability to differentiate on who is "African-American" or just "African"? (In that context)

I have came across similar topics about this on several forums such as Topix, Mediatakeout individuals will always state "All our ancestors were the same color" the problem with this is "ALL OUR ANCESTORS DIDN'T LOOK ALIKE" and when individuals state this ridiculous assertion they always post these 2 "Specific" pictures for some "Odd" reason. Check below

The problem with this picture above is First. that these people within this picture are NOT the ancestors of "African-Americans" this picture is around the 13th century. 2nd the people within this picture are "East Africans" mostly Sundanese/Dinka people. Who are known to be some the most tallest, and darkest Africans on the planet, but here's a shocker not ALL "East Africans" are dark, for example Ethiopians, have a variety of complexions, as well as Kenyans. So to those of you who keep posting this picture do some real research, and stop being ignorant.

East African slaves above the Daphne, Once again this is not African-Americans ancestors these people were brought to several places throughout Asia and Europe.

This picture below gives a more "Accurate" representation of how "African-American" WEST AFRICAN ancestors look and this is a damn movie, why? because in West Africa most of them are Brown to Dark Brown complextion. See the Wolof, Mbundu, Mossi, Mandinka, Yoruba, Igbo, Fulani people etc.

Notice the "Brown" complexion and different hair textures of the women? now keep in mind that most of these actors were "African-American" SHOCKER ISN'T IT!? so is these people your "Average" African-American? It is heavily noted and documented, when Purtoguese and English slave masters stole slaves from West Africa, they specifically stated how many of them were "Lighter" then the others, most notable being "Igbos" it is documented how slave masters had a lust for "Igbo" women, due to their more "Brown" and "Fairer" skin complexion. So why I am at it i have decided to dispell the "Myths" amongst many dumb negroes who are easily decieved.

Myth 1: Africans are extremely dark, so in order to be "Pure" you must be extremely dark.

Fact: Africans are not extremely are, you cannot say "Most" africans are extremely dark, because most Africans range from light brown to dark brown. Here is proof......

South African Zulu men....

South African Zulu Women....Notice the women in the back are much darker? and the women in the front are fitting the stereotypical "Average" African-American (Whatever the hell that means)

Children from East Africa, Uganda notice the different shades? I thought all Africans suppose to be "Dark" because it seems that other people are able to arrogantly tell a "Suppose" difference between African-Americans and continental Africans, but these kids look absolutely NO DIFFERENT then the children within my community.

I just love proving people wrong.

These two children represents the predominate skin tones within the African-American community, and guess what? These two children are African-Americans, As someone who live in the black community, surrounded by a whole bunch of black people, who are of African descent within the city of Chicago, I can tell you that most of us range from Brown to Dark Brown, there is no such thing as an "Average" African-American, just like there is no such thing as an "Average" African.

I can keep this up all damn day.....

I GURANTEE you will not find a lot of babies that look like this within the African-American community, so wipe that stupid look off your face, and pick up some knowledge.

Does "Light Skin" exist within West Africa? UMMMMMM YES! I seen them with my own "Eyes"....a reknowned senegolese singer "Vivian Ndour" is light skin, but she is just one of the many light skin Africans walking around in Africa, as someone who have walked into over 5 countries within West Africa, I have the authority to speak on it, but IGNORANT ass Americans will have you think different thanks to over 300 years of social conditioning.

The lovely, beautiful, talented "Viviane Ndour" she is not fitting the "Typical" African profile...so watch the ignorant bufoons state that she must be "Mixed", or "Mixed somewhere down the line" because in this fucked up shithole of a country people have absolutely defined what "Specific" color "Pure" black must come in, in order to be "Pure Black" you must look like this....

As I have stated before, Alek Wek is from East Africa, she belongs to the Dinka People, who are known to be the most tallest, and darkest people on the planet, but their rich cocoa skin makes them ever more beautiful, life began in East Africa, it's hotter and denser in East Africa, no European or confused negroes have the right to define who or what is "Authentically" or "Pure" African, also Alek Wek has Libyan Ancestry....how's that for a punchline?

Now here's some more pictures of REAL African-Americans who live in the damn community

Wow? now which of these kids fit the "Average" African-American "Look" and which of them fits the "Average" African "Look"? I wonder is this picture just some random excuse? because of course the average African-American don't look like none of the kids in the above picture, but sadly these are African-American children, same looking children I see in my neighborhood playing.

Members of the NBBP (New Black Panther Party) Wow? Understand they represent a huge fraction of the African-American communities, and I don't think it's so conviently they don't fit the so-called "Average" African-American archetype. Shall I go on? So now it's time for me to dispell "Myth 2"

Myth 2: African-Americans are light skin because of slave master rape

Fact: 1.Most African-Americans are not Light Skin as proven, 2. Light Skin is not related to rape, it's very common within West and South Africa, 3.Most slave masters never raped their female slaves, and if most African slave women were raped, then who did African men reproduce with? to increse the "Slave Population"?? *Valid Question*

Myth 3: Most African-Americans have European ancestry, and Native American ancestry

Fact: Most African-Americans do not have European Ancestry, and Native American ancestry, because most Slave Masters never raped their female slaves, that is the biggest myth behind this who fiasco. 2.Native Americans rarely had relationships with African slaves, because many of their tribes forbidden marriage or any kind of relationships with non-natives. 3.DNA geneology testing is flawed, and not accurate the tests gives "Estimates" and are NOT definitive, some tests shows up a person can have ancestry from one specific group of people, but may not have none. DO SOME REAL DAMN RESEARCH!!!!! AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!

Myth 4: African Americans do not look like Africans

Fact: As proven "Most" African-Americans (Who are Africans) look like their West, East, and South African counterparts, and to prove this notion even further i'll leave you with this closing statement from National Geographic.

"Africans are the most genetically diverse of humans on this planet, meaning different skin tones, hair textures and facial features" - National Geographic

LET THE LIGHT OF TRUTH BURN THE IGNORANCE FROM YOUR MIND!!!

And for the record....African-Americans do not all look alike.

I am NOT surprised, by the execution of Troy Davis

2011-09-23T16:45:00.108-05:00

Maybe we will never be able to intake "Common" sense, I don't know why? rather we petitioned, protested, or marched nothing will never be ours because we don't have any true power; and we don't fight for true power. I posted the petitioned on my blog, just to give it a shot; But there was absolutely no guarantee they would have freed the brother or granted him clemency, in front of my college "Columbia College Chicago" there were protests, by blacks, whites and whoever else. So the issue of race was of deep concern, but also the matter of injustice that has taken place over the execution of a man who is, or could have been innocent.

When I heard about the execution of brother Troy Davis, I was startled, but then reality hit me in the face, and I took a huge look at my surroundings, and the people within this society, where everyone seems to define "Justice" within their own point of view, since no one have a thorough definition of what "Justice" really means, so it's by far only a "Social Construct" we define justice to suit our own views. I know much about the history of Georgia, and the Injustices that have taken place within the state; but where does an individual who supposedly committed a murder, for whom there is no conclusive evidence of this crime, validates what is just or unjust? How does murdering a man for a crime he supposedly committed is justice?

Many people is still wondering about this?, many were upset about this, people even cried over this incident, but what we are not doing is "Fighting" for our right to live or become intellectually independent. We can protest, petition, scream, holler, moan and shed tears but nothing will never get done if we do not take physical or intellectual action; we are still naive towards the system and how it works; if we for one actually "Thought" that brother Troy Davis was going to be let go, then we are truly in a deep sleep. There was no doubt in my mind, that he was not going to be executed, I seen people pray to "Jesus" and "God"; but as always what does prayer actually delivers? how does it help us when we are against the odds? how does god benefit us when we are staring death in it's face? how did God benefit troy davis? honestly, no god or Jesus will ever give us true justice; you can't beg this system for justice; you take justice into your own hands and in your own matter.

If we were really serious about Justice; we would have began to revolt, we would take this situation to the next level, it would be broadcast globally like the London riots, it would be extremely controversial, wearing shirts that say "I am Troy Davis" is not going to solve absolutely anything, and the individuals who say they are troy davis, NO YOU ARE NOT, troy davis was facing death row for over 20 years, Troy Davis didn't get an ounce of freedom, he has been executed, you cannot even imagine to be in his place, or comprehend the thoughts what it was like to be him, so of all keep the arrogance to yourself. I don't have the right, to even place myself into the same category as Troy Davis; so at the end of the day, what can we actually do? BRACE YOURSELF! because here is a "Reality" check.

Most of us, had absolutely no idea who Troy Davis was, prior to a couple of weeks ago, but that does not mean we don't have the right to be upset; or inferiority over this injustice; so it's not logical to assume or assert such. Each individual whether black, white or whatever; have to take care of their "Own" needs and wants, we have to work to maintain some form of income; We go to school to obtain degrees, that will in return suit and cater to our own "Interest"; what's the first thing we think about when we wake up in the morning? it's not black, white, it's not gay or straight, it's not religion, and it damn sure is not Troy Davis, we wake up the first thing we think about, is ourselves. we think about having enough money, working, health, school, our jobs and most of all our "Image". We don't think about the brother or sister, who is sitting on death row when we wake up. We don't think about the millions of starving kids while we are out shopping for groceries, we don't think about individuals who have diseases, when we are the one's able to afford medicare.

Mostly everything we do. is for our own self-interest; at what point do we come across the man or woman on the street begging for change, and we either ignore them or give them money. But when we give them money, do it make us feel good? are we really sincere about our "Morals" we have accumulated over a course of time, whether through social interactions or our religious beliefs? are we only for making our-self feel good, because we want to feel like we are indeed doing what is "Right", or what is "Just"; how are we sure that the man on the street might actually buy some food with the money we have given them or spend it on drugs or alcohol? why do we have to think about these things if we are actually "Sincere"? about our ethics, I contend we only do things because we "Believe" that it is "Just" in doing so, but we have absolutely no idea.

I for one, can honestly admit, I give money to bums on the streets all the time, I hate seeing people starving, especially my people, but at some point when I am low on cash, I will think about myself first and the last dollar I have within my pocket before I give that individual my last cache of funds. Because of course, I would be the individual who will suffer in the end. But in reality I am very "Sincere" and very ethical in what I do, I don't do what I do, to feel self-validated, I'm not interested in spending an eternity in an imaginary place called "Heaven" I do what I do, because that individual could be me, but will I "Honestly" want to trade places with a person such as that? No i would not, and anyone who tells you otherwise is lying. The point I am making, is that when we wear shirts entitled "I am Troy Davis" it actually does not prove anything, It makes ourselves naive to the complexity of life, and display a level of arrogance towards an individual who has loss their life. or are in a situation where we are too distant to grasp.

Almost every single individual who wore an "I am Troy Davis" shirt, would not want to even trade places with the brother, and that's just the truth. We look for our revolution in all the wrong ways, it's because in reality we don't know what to do. Begging to give the brother clemency is just showing how submissive we are to the system, we talk about "Cracka" this, and "Cracka" that, but just who exactly who we went begging to? because when it came down to it, It wasn't a "White" man decision or a "Black" man decision it was a "Law System" decision, the fact that two of the Supreme Court decision makers was "Black" doesn't determine the outcome of the case, they didn't view Troy Davis as their "Brother", they viewed him as a criminal, even when their was not enough visible evidence for the public to decide on the true outcome. So what you have is a game full of players, but only one "Winner", and the winner was the player with the most control, and the winner is the "System".

We even went so far to try and obtain Obama's attention, I have absolutely no idea what was many of us thinking or trying to accomplish? I witness the Chicago protest, and even talk to a few of the protesters, I signed another petition, but deep down in my heart, I already knew it wouldn't have worked, because we don't have the power to make any changes, especially changes within the system, and putting all our faith within a system, or president is naive. You can't depend on a system or institution that is determined to maintain it's own cast system. It's stupid, I know we tried to do something, I know we tried putting fourth to maintain effort, but we are gonna have to do something better and more logical if we really want to prove something. No one takes us serious, because we don't take ourselves serious; It's time we adjust to reality, as I have, and many have, and the reality is we don't have any power, and we can't save anybody, and not even ourselves......

Busy with School....

2011-09-18T20:18:00.000-05:00

So I havn't been on my blog in a couple of days, due to me being busy with school, and the Current Projects that I am working on, So most likely I will be posting some more work, and expressing my views on various topics. Right now, I have to focus on school. So it is what it is...

Troy Davis Petition Sign...PLEASE SIGN!!!!

2011-09-15T20:21:00.003-05:00

The Brother is Innocent, If we can gather up and go purchase "Lil Waynes" Album, Why can't we save this brothers life? Especially when it is clear he is Innocent?. Click here to sign the petition. or Click the link to the left side of my blog. To read about the Troy Davis case click here, or click here

The signature count is currently at 248,008 And I know damn well, there is more of "Us" who are, or should be "Aware"...smdh, however I have no faith in this petition, because when it comes down to it, however you look at it, we have no power. And we don't control the Supreme Courts descision.

My Top 10 Biggest Pest Peeves! With These "Post-Racial" FUCK TARDS!!!

2011-09-01T17:10:00.002-05:00

We all know how i feel about this "Identity" issue within the African-American communities or with African/Black people in general. After getting back from my 16hr flight from Lagos, Nigeria and arriving back into this country i am startled by much of the ignorance here, especially these so-called "Black People" from various countries such as this one, the Caribbean, and South America etc. These individuals who simply don't want to associate themselves with anything "African", they always find any amount of excuses, or illiterate arguments to come up with a reason why they are not "African", it is really annoying to a certain extent, despite the title this is more of a "Rant" then just "pet peeves", not to mention the arrogance i hear from their "White"-American counterparts, who will always clamber up any argument to support their half understanding of "Obvious" definitions. The annoyance is much greater then someone who can obviously write it off as "Why do you care? let people be what they want?" while that statement has much merit of truth to it the issue is much more complex then that, the fact of the matter is, this mindset that many people who are of African "Descent" exhibit is the same mentality that their ancestors drew upon once they were ripped from their identity, so they resorted to defining themselves simply by the "European Perception" of their skin color being "BLACK" or perhaps "Negro" and the most famous Portuguese equivalent "Nigger".

As stated previously If so-called "Black" people don't know they are indeed an African people, then the most logical word is to call them "Niggers" (That's right, because what's the difference between Black & Nigger?, nothing but the language that is spoken) These dummies simply do not get it, but of course let me list my top 12 biggest annoyances i have with many "Black" people, and other people!

1. "I'm not African i'm American, i was born here, i don't know anyone in Africa, i never been to Africa"

The problem with the above is these individuals, don't know that "African" is a race, and "Black" is not, they believe it's some form of "Nationality" but it's not, "American" is their nationality, hence the term "African-American" it refers to human beings who are "African" living in "America" African-American is an "Ethnic Group" the confusion which many others (Including whites) comes from the ending letters of "Can" such as in "AfriCAN" and "AmeriCAN" but they are not "Nationalities" one is a "Race" the other is a "Nationality", what the hell is so hard about learing the difference? one is based on biological make up and the other is based on CITIZENSHIP!! LEARN THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE FOR FUCKS SAKE!!!

2. "There are White South Africans living in African aren't they African"

The problem with the latter is no different then the former, this problem stems from a false "Identity" that was created by "Dutch" and "British" imperialists (People of European descent) who colonize the south African region, and created their own "Sovereign" identity that simply is the product of "Colonialism" these so-called "Afrikaners" are not "African" they do not speak an "Indigenous" African language, because it was not spoken nor created out the mouths of "Africans", these people are "Europeans", thus "Afrikaner" is a Euro-centric establish identity, so NO! they are not African! "South African" in general is a "Nationality" which encompasses the country of "South Africa", which to little knowledge did the dutch actually acknowledge other "South African" countries within that region such as Zimbabwe, Mozambique etc. It's confusing isn't it? well all fake-identities are!!!!!

3. "I am of African descent but i am not African"

This is ABSOLUTELY!!! the most dumbest if not the most annoying statement ever spoken out the mouths of people who proclaim they are "Black of African descent" these people obviously do not know what the word "Descent" mean, how on earth could your ancestors be African, look the same way that you probably look, same hair, same skin ect But you automatically come to some unstable pre-conceived false sense of understanding by saying "You are not African" or perhaps "I am of African descent but i am not African" LMFAO!! the situation here becomes laughable, justly the slave-masters powers at work. because if someone is saying they are of "African descent" just exactly what does that mean? they obviously admit to being "African" i have heard similar statements with European-Americans! who say things like "I am of European descent does that make me European?" :/ but you will never hear an "Asian" saying "I am Chinese, but does that mean i am of Asian descent?" OBVIOUSLY! in other words! YOU ARE!!!! SO LEARN THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE!!!

4. "I ain't no African i look different"

Just exactly how do an African look? this ignorance comes from a few African immigrants who migrate here and promote the stereotypical look that every African must have, according to MOST Americans! that all Africans must look like Alek Wek, little do they know,that anyone have been to Africa knows that the majority of Africans are Brown to Dark-Brown, and there are also lighter-skin Africans, and all these people have various different looks! but perhaps the propaganda from the Us, and a few interactions with African immigrants these idiots believe they look entirely different, but little do they know that their are TONS of Africans (who immigrated from Africa) born within the states who live presently alongside with African-Americans SHOCKING ISN'T IT!!? AND I GUARANTEE THAT NO ONE WOULD TELL THE DIFFERENCE!!!, put a suti on an African-American, you couldn't tell if he was born in America, put a fitted cap on a Yoruba and some baggy jeans you couldn't tell if he was Nigerian! I GUARANTEE IT!! YOU BIG FUCKING DUMMIES!!!

Now this where these pet peeves get real interesting, you have the one's who know they are African, or have some African in them? but always want to dissociate themselves with just being "African/Black"

5."I'm not just African though, i have European and Native American ancestors"

I can't wait to debunk this myth, because anyone with literal knowledge of "Genetics & Biology" knows geneological DNA tests are not accurate hell even evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins pointed this out within his book entitled the "Selfish Gene" and many Biologists and various articles online have pointed out the "Misleading" results on these tests! but everyone seems to believe that all African-Americans have European and Native American ancestry. And these are same people who don't know anything about Slavery within America, they believe that all slave women were raped! (Myth) and also "White slave masters" did not mate often with their female slaves, it was actually the male slaves (THAT IS OBVIOUS), and most Native American people did not mate with Africans because it was forbidden to mate with "Outsiders" (However europeans were an exception to rule) but these are the same individuals who would dissociate the fact that they came out looking "African" and not "European" or "Asian" (Native American) i swear this problem is mainly with Africans in America, we are so unsure about identity we will always dissociate ourselves being African! It's funny how we can believe in inaccurate results for whom there is no hard core substantial evidence for, but we accept the fact that Christ died on a cross for our sins, when their is substantial and conclusive evidence for why he didn't! people only "Believe" in science if it helps support their views! and this state of mind and reasoning is irrational.

6. "I'm not black, i'm not African i'm human and race is a social construct"

And this has always been a problem with us we are not willing to accept the fact that we are different, our hair texture, skin color, bone structure and our looks itself is a defining factor, not just of human characteristics, but this this simply has always been the defining factor of us! we seem to not want to acknowledge the obvious physical difference between various peoples, but everyone seems to know and point out a "Black Guy" when they see one LOL race is not "Color" blind, it's not just a social construct it is a social reality, it may not exist on a biological level. But it exists on a political, financial, sociological and economical level; our race is simply why we were put in this position we are in today, if we keep lying to ourselves we will forever be used, and taken advantage of and exploited. Our problem is we want to be the "Same", we know deep down inside our skin color and looks is completely and distinctively different then anyone else, we know an African when we see one, we know a European when we see one, we know an Asian when we see one, why is it that we are always the "We are the world" promoters?

7. "My race is Human"

I guess these individuals who spew this nonsense, forgot to take a modern "Anthropology" class, or perhaps a biology class, whether they are black, white, blue green or purple i hear this NONSENSE! there is not one chapter or page,within any biology book that lists a race called "Human", however there is a "Species" known as "Homo Sapiens" (Humans) humanity is not a "Race" it is a "Species" LEARN THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE!!!!!

8."I am against black unity, i am for human unity, we are all equal now"

I swear these individuals have to be the most annoying, most aggravating,most insulting, most arrogant individuals on this planet, i hate how many of us walk around thinking everything has "Changed" and black people are just as "Equal" as everyone else yeah we might be in a "Biological" sense but even that has it's limits, these individuals are the types of people who choose to hinder anything productive black people can do as a whole to benefit ourselves, they will sit back and let the current plight of "White Supremacy" run it's course for the next 100-200 years, while they maintain the ideologies of "Unifying" with everyone else, well here's a news flash, Europeans didn't unify with black people to get where they are, Asians didn't unify with black people to get where they are, Hispanics (not a race) didn't or is really interested in unifying with black people to get where they need to go!, So all these various people who market and capitalize off of African people, if much of any "Unity" they do it on a minimal and strategic basics so they can become "Self-Sufficient" so that's going to only help benefit THEMSELVES!!! so why on earth are you against African black people unifying? YOUR ASS IS CRAZY!!! you want to unify with everyone else BUT DON'T NOBODY WANNA UNIFY WITH YOU!!! AIN'T SHIT CHANGED SO PUT DOWN THE KOOL-AID AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!

9. "I'm not racist but uh..."

I hate individuals who always find someway to justify their masked, or subliminal racism by asserting the following "I'm not racist but i have black friends but why are black people so loud?" the obvious prejudice is condescending, and easily passed off as something a "Non-Racist Post-Racial" era loving dickhead would say, don't get me wrong, some individuals may not be "Racist" but what is the point of telling us you have friends of another racial group? hell even the American Nazi Party and Nation of Islam got along at some point in time!

And now for the number "10" biggest pet peeve that get's on my fucking nerves....*DRUM ROLL*

10."It's 2011 racism still exist?"

OMFG! i don't even know where to begin, i hear this so-much i want to ask myself am i a damn martian? what is my interaction with other humans? who view my "Obvious" appearance as somewhat friendly? or menacing? (I have no answer to this question) but it doesn't take a rocket scientist, to know that if "Certain" groups never really gotten alone in history based on "Skin" color they really wouldn't so much now, because one particular group is obviously in a better position then this group, because of past history, and racial segregation within various communities is obvious! but just because you have a few or many friends who don't happen to be apart of your race and you get along, isn't the defining factor for everyone else within that race! SO WAKE THE FUCK UP OR SIT THE FUCK DOWN!!!...

whew!!!.......i need another vacation!

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! FRED HAMPTON!!! August 30, 1948 – December 4, 1969

2011-08-30T04:49:00.000-05:00

"You can kill a revolutionary, but you can't kill the revolution" - Fred Hampton

"You can jail a revolutionary, but you can't jail the revolution" - Fred Hampton

"I believe I'm going to die doing the things I was born to do. I believe I'm going to die high off the people. I believe I'm going to die a revolutionary in the international revolutionary proletarian struggle." - Fred Hampton
"We've got to face the fact that some people say you fight fire best with fire, but we say you put fire out best with water. We say you do'nt fight racism with racism. We're gonna fight racism with solidarity." - Fred Hampton

Today is the great Fred Hampton's birthday born on August 30,1948, and died on December 4, 1969, He is simply one of the most influential figures within the Pan-African movement also one of the leading members of the original and true, Black Panther Party, he was the leader and Chairman of the Chicago and Illinois Black Panther chapter. To read more click here

My Problem With The "Concious Community" READ WITH CAUTION

2011-08-20T04:40:00.002-05:00

NOTE: Before i begin to discuss several issues i have with the conscious communities, and various individuals within the communities who promote "Pseudo" Ideologies, guided by "Pseudo" Ethics, I want those of you who are reading this, to understand this does not apply to "ALL" of the individuals within the CC, but it apply to "MANY" of you, because it needs to be said. And honestly i could give a rats ass about who have a problem with much of what i say, because i value "Reason" and "Logic", wheres many within the conscious community do NOT.

I have never proclaimed myself as a "Member" of the so-called "Conscious" community, due to me valuing the thoughts of reason, but never blinded by individualism, because I believe the best tactics to obtaining a common goal is through strategic planning amongst individuals (Working together). However I never really seen a reason to associate myself with the so-called "Conscious" because I find many of them to be not who they honestly say they are. I am always open to new views, discussions and opinions; I have came across several conscious individuals whether it be through, Youtube, Skype, MediaTakeOut, Topix, or Facebook ect I even come across many of them out here in the Chicago area. Many of those who align themselves within the conscious community give good thoughts and opinions on the issues of the Black/African communities today, and the crisis and current state that Black/Africans on a global economical scale are facing. Whether we are in the diaspora, or on the continent. Many of them give good lectures as far as Education, Finance, Business, Marketing, Health resources, ect.

So there is much good that comes from the conscious community. But the problem I have is with the "Bad" that also comes from the conscious communities and the big "Package" that it delivers, the problem I have is the "High Expectations" from various individuals, or perhaps the "Idol Worshiping" of "Particular" individuals; and also, the "Misogynists" exploits within the community. The Pseudo "Ethics" that guild many of them, and the self-defined principles that individuals hold in "Truth". Many of those within the conscious community, would proclaim they indeed have the "Truth", but at what cost?, what is the truth? the so-called "Truth" that many of them hold, does not and never will obscure from fact, which is based on substantial and conclusive evidence. Allot of members within the CC, have some sort of "Moral" guideline an individual must "Follow" for themselves to be considered "Conscious", because keep in mind, if anyone fails within this moral guideline they will be criticized, ostracized and neglected by many within the conscious community.

There are numerous individuals within the CC who criticized others for a different way of life, or different point of view, or perhaps a different ideology. If your view does not meet the standard set by a conformed structure of someone else, they are quick to tell you how you are misguided. A lot of them give lectures, a lot of them give speeches at a few small associations, and a lot of them worry about meaningless topics that is not going to help them achieve absolutely nothing, a lot of them are also very picky within the topics they read or choose, a lot of them have close-minded views on political thought, and advance social sciences, some are even absolutely ignorant about these things, but they are first to apply a "Militant" step to the problem. this is not "Consciousness" this is ignorance, and arrogance. Many of them don't even work together, because they themselves subconsciously are blinded by "Individualism".

Some are even arrogantly open with it, some are even simply trying to gain a small supportive group of "Followers" or perhaps blossom and become a self-absorbed individual. We should all be striving to become leaders, this isn't a matter of being a chief with no Indians, this is simply about strategic thinking, critical analyzes and the value of rationale thought, simply guided by the minds own intellectual comprehension. But too many of them are appraising the best "Talkers" and not the best "Doers", many are only hopping on the bandwagon, for what sounds "Socially Correct" whether it's being discuss within topics like Race, Religion, Ethics, Politics, Finance etc. But not many have offer a real solution to these problems. Which leads me to question many of those within the CC, on an "Intellectual" level.

But they are yet no different then their counterpart so-called "Unconscious" blacks, who are completely oblivious towards the plight of African people on a global economical scale. They exhibit the same pessimistic behavior towards many topics, whenever it disagrees with their own ideologies, many cannot even comprehend the basics of literal thought, this is not "Consciousness" as i stated, this is simply ignorance. Alot of them manifest their animosity towards the "White Establishment" some even proclaim themselves to be the "Militant Forefront", but yet they have no armies, no combat strategies, no F1 raptor jets, no submarines, no guns or ammunition stocks, what about enough rations? everything is "White Owned" & white manufactured to fit the European ideal image, but there is nothing in the African image, but his dignity that is completely being compromise or given away.

Many within the conscious community, live by a standard of "What's right" or "What's wrong" who defines this standard? (I have absolutely no idea), many go so far to define what is "African" and what is not. Many of them, probably have never set foot within Africa, because Africans don't embrace all that is "African", considering the fact, that most if not all Africans don't agree or identify with a common ideology whether it be through politics, finance or economical routing, Africa is complex, There is no way, you can get a average continental African or average diaspora African to agree on the same political anarchy. You cannot even get most Africans within America to agree on a common goal, so the conscious community is no different. They don't embrace "Diversity" many think with a narrow-minded point of view, what is "African"? how do we define what an African should be ? or suppose to do? what is morally "African"?

African is simply a race of individuals who originate off the continent of Africa, if we took a time machine back 3,000 years ago; There is absolutely no way, an Ancient Kemetic individual would define himself as "African" or "Black" or agree with you on a specific goal, because of different culture, different lifestyle, different beliefs and different gods. So the point of this analogy is very clear, and this is why the Conscious Communities are as divisive as they are, because they don't embrace "Diversity", they don't practice what they preach, they don't self-observe, or self-critique, or practice self-realization. Many only define themselves on the moral aspect of what is right, or perhaps what is genuinely considered "African"? and that is one of their biggest problems. This is simply nothing more then a game of semantics, you define ethics in your point of view, but your point of view cannot and will not define the point of view for others.

So once again, I don't expect no one to agree. And it's logical for someone to be skeptical, but those within the CC need to be less ignorant, less judgmental, more smart, and strategic, and embrace more diversity. The brutal slaying of "BlaqueIndigo" was a product of those who proclaimed themselves to be the most righteous of "African centered people", but yet they allow this misfortune to continue?, this does not excuse the actions of BlaqueIndigo's hypocrisy, but it gives much of a wake up call to those who deem themselves as "Conscious". Judgment should be based simply on reason, and observation, not self-confined creeds or opinions from different individuals who they themselves may have some skeletons in their closet.

Taking this route and deeming one's self as "Conscious" isn't about perfection, it's simply about quality and skills, the skills various individuals have obtained through education; who in return can utilize these useful skills to the struggle of African people, so this is indeed heavily needed. But yet many of them consistently ignore these important things; A prostitute who happens to be well educated in the field of Political science would be more of use, then an individual who resides in the conscious community trying to define what is "Authentically African" and have absolutely no skills to offer, the arrogance that many within the CC exhibits is an insult to intellectual thought. If much these are the individuals that need to be held by a certain standard or criteria, while the prostitute will more likely offer some rational explanation for her "Personal Lifestyle" with less of the criticism.

Many of them within the CC, profess themselves to be "Pan-African", and I wonder do many of them know the exact definition of being "Pan-African"? this ideology must be revise and up to date to suit a modern standard or it's going to completely die out. Pan-Africanism can only work based on "Diversity" and not on "Divisiveness" if such this problem will completely contradict Pan-Africanism. But many within the CC simply do not understand the true definition or have a real broad understanding of this goal, because everyone wants to be leaders but only in a self-individualized perception. This is not intelligence, this is not logical, embrace the complexity of different individuals, whether or not different views or opinions are shared, this is how a nation works, it's a "Balance" that is installed for the government or any nation to function correctly, in other words it's called "Democracy", but this shall not or will ever substitute the means to true economical liberation.
Many within the CC, have no true understanding of liberation, because it's simply a self-define word. Liberation can and will only be achieved by the means of the educated mind, and the intellectual thought that it values. The logic and reason that processes thoroughly, once we are free of all religions, pseudo-ethics, traditional ideologies, conformed governments, and conspiracy theories; then the individual by all means have achieved liberation on a mental scale. The social economic aspect of liberation, is freedom within a self-beneficial society that will stop capitalist controlled motives, and the money that is being distributed in paverse ways. By all means, those in the conscious community must know and understand the difference between the two.

The conscious community are no more human then the next, who are they to define what is morally right and what is morally wrong?, which it self is simply subjective; who defines the way a black woman should where her hair?, who defines whether a black woman should not take pride in her natural born state of nudity? who defines the standards of whether a black man is sexually equip to meet a black woman's standards? who or what defines what is "Authentically African"? by all means, it's ALL a social construct. This does not mean, high standards should not be expected, and it does not mean power should be abuse, or the image shall be misguided or condescending, this is simply by all means the basic of interacting amongst each other on a "Reasonable" level heterogeneously. This is the value of intellect, instead of blinded morality, because in the end all morals and standards are set by an "Accustomed" society, so in reality it's all the same, just a different stamp of approval.

The Misogynists exploits within the community are one thing, and the colorism and sexism is another, as well as the paranoia of individuals being an "Agent", these are issues that must be addressed, because if a different individual offers a different solution, or does something others might consider "Strange" they call them an "Agent", or perhaps those who are of white and black heritage, but identify solely with their black side are called names like "Mutt", "Half-Cast" and "Halfrican" the list goes on, but these are the same "Individuals" who deem themselves as "Conscious" you cannot be "Conscious" if you do not project Intellectual thought, you cannot be "Conscious" if you are not intelligent, for only one can be "Conscious" if you are "Intelligent", so why the lack of reasoning within the CC?

The sexism and misogynists exploits of African/Black women within the CC, and the ignorance that perpetuate the belief of a woman being completely "Submissive", those females who object to this so-called "Morally Right" choice of submissiveness are branded as "Feminists" sexist males would use this argument to justify their own sexist male-pseudo ideologies, so once again who defines a woman to be "Submissive"? who sets this standard? the CC must answer these questions, many females within the conscious community, become used as sexual exploits, to fill the need of misogynistic males who deem themselves as "Polygamist"; the sociological aspect of this situation is obvious, females who find comfort within individuals who they perceived as "Conscious", and "African-Centered" and then the men who play on these females emotions, this is not someone who is for Pan-Africanism, this is someone who is self-absorbed, this is not the product of a so-called African-Centered "Conscious" male.

Diversity should be embrace, but a low-tolerance should be given, especially to those who are put on pedestals and initiate into this kind of behavior, but this is the same consciousness many of these individuals find no fault in. Idol worship is the problem here, the dying need for everyone to gain some form of attention is rampant, everyone wants the spot light, but i guarantee no one wants all the problems.

In conclusion:

Much of the conscious community is not much any different from the "Unconscious" community, the only difference being the level of awareness many within the CC display compared to the majority of those in the black communities. Each has their flaws, cause no one if perfect, but it's a problem when someone sets a specific standard and everyone adjusts to these standards, this is no different then mental slavery, moreso mental masturbation. The arrogance by many within the CC offends me, but honestly what am i so rattled about? i am not apart of the "Conscious" community. i just value Intellectual thought, but if one professes to be Pan-African, he/she should be willingly to embrace diversity, but even that has it's limits!

HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!! MARCUS GARVEY!!! August 17, 1887 - June 1940

2011-08-17T09:14:00.000-05:00

He was born in St. Ann's Bay, Jamaica, he was a Writer, Publisher, Leader, Pan-African, Black Nationalist, Entrepreneur, and the sole leader of the "Back To Africa" movement, and one of the forefathers of Pan-Africanism, his own Pan-African philosophy was known as "Garveyism" To learn more click here
or here

This damn "Afro-Romance" Ad is Insulting....

2011-08-17T03:17:00.001-05:00

I did two rebuttal articles that is against placing "Whites" on pedestals as compatible mate for black men and women, which reasons were obviously superficial (As always) and to have this damn insulting "Afro-Romance" ad on my blog (Thanks google) is a slap in the face to me.

The Ad is for the website called "Afro-Romance" now you would think by the way this website sounds it promotes "Love" between Black-Men and Women (Which is obviously needed) but yet it's a site that mainly caters to "Interracial Dating" (Claps, more propaganda) why do they call it "Afro-Romance" is simply beyond me, but it is obvious that there is an "Agenda" behind this. I just find it funny, that this interracial dating amongst black men and especially women is trying to take it's own image, and slap it on every stamp that so happens to have something to do with a black man or black woman, but yet you don't see the same thing with whites!? hmmmm? i wonder why?

List of Content Coming Soon.

2011-08-17T03:08:00.000-05:00

I want to give a list of the new content and articles that is soon to be making it's way unto my blog.

1.Blog: Layout Change and Structure.
2.Blog: Links to affiliate sites.
3.Article: DNA flaws in Admixture testing, The Slave Master Rape Myth.
4.Article: Black Hebrew Israelite, Rejection Of Africa and Distorted Truth.
5.Article: Black Men Vs Black Women, Animosity Of Two Fools (Full Article)
6.Entertainment: Video Section, Music, Instrumentals etc.
7.Entertainment: African Intellectual Thought, and Intelligence

And that's pretty much it everyone, stay tuned.

8 Reasons You Might Consider Dating a White Woman (My Response)

2011-08-17T02:41:00.001-05:00

You all just didn't think i will only attack the sisters point of view, now would you? it's time to attack the ignorance from both sides. As always the individuals who allow themselves to be consumed by main-stream media, with all this "Interracial Propaganda" it's all going to passed around like the "Halo" effect (Whew) As i did some goggling around on the Madame Noire website, while reading the "8 Reasons To Date A White Man" i looked at the bottom of the site and seen a "Similar" article written by fellow African-American Intellectual Boyce Watkins, though i am surprise he would even write an Article like this as a sign of "Rebuttal" i personally believe he himself as an "Intellectual;" and a very outspoken brother should have went about it in a more "Logical" and reasonable way, besides that's what being an "Intellectual" is about! we don't stoop to the levels of others, we are much better then that, the Article titled "8 Reasons You Might Consider Dating a White Woman" doesn't offer any Intellectual thought, it once again jump to the defense for superficial reasons black men, may choose to date white women. So let's the start the analyzes! "First, I’ll start this article by saying, “just kidding.” I have immense loyalty to black women, and that’s all I’ve ever dated in my adult life. But after reading the article “8 Reasons to date a white man,” I just had to respond for the brothers. We know white men are just as imperfect as the rest of us. But the idea that the author decided to put white males on a pedestal above black men without considering the challenges of being black in America had me fuming. So, here are some reasons that those brothers who date white women might have decided to do so:"
Brother Watkins start the article off with a meaningless phrase "Just kidding", honestly within the state of the black community, and this current gender war, you may want to be careful on how you choose your words and your rebuttal! Being "Loyal" to Black Women, don't result into Pseudo rebuttals like this. As an intellectual you are better then that; The one's who feed into this gender war, are looking for problems amongst each other, comparing ourselves to "Whites" has never been a smart or intelligent thing for us to do. Why should we put them on pedestals whether we are joking or not? But anyway, anyhow maybe i could be thinking to deep? but let's give a critical look at the reasons listed. 1) They don’t blame all their problems on black men

"If you’re beautiful, educated, successful and can’t keep a man, must it always be because black men are fundamentally flawed? How about taking some responsibility for what happens in your own life? You can start by getting your relationship advice from someone other than Steve Harvey – you do know he’s a comedian, right? If you’re getting relationship advice from a comedian, don’t be surprised when your love life turns into a complete joke."
I can't say i disagree with all of what he said, (And it has nothing to do with me being a black male, this is just a real good argument he has presented to black women, which is questioning your own self, and observing your own flaws.) However i would like the add, that as men we should also take responsibility for our own flaws as well, it is only reasonable to do such. (Because we are no better) The notion of "Black Male Blaming" can be seen on "YouTube" and read on forums like "Topix" And also the "Black Female Blaming" can be seen on Youtube and read on Topix ect. It's an ongoing conflict, but these individuals do not represent the majority of African-Americans. Though it's rampant within the media who take's statistical readings and blow them out of proportion. . However this shouldn't be a reason for dating "White Women", because these females doesn't represent the majority of black women. (It's another superficial reason)

2) Being nice is not a crime

"This isn’t representative of all sisters, but I’m sure you know the angry black woman whose face stays crinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil, and every situation is begging for a fight. Black women sometimes breed a natural toughness among one another, and that toughness can be rough to deal with. Your soul doesn’t have to be made of beef jerky and a man shouldn’t have to fight through 45 layers of bitter resentment to find the window to your kindness."

My problem with the above statement, is he specifically said "This isn't representative of all sisters", but then finds comfort to committing a fallacy known as "Appeal To Composition", he discusses the plight of the angry (black woman whose face stays crinkled up like a piece of aluminum foil, and "Every" situation is begging for a fight, and then he goes on to say Black Women "Sometimes" breed a natural toughness among one another, and that toughness can be rough to deal with). The reason does not honestly give a clear explanation on why black males should find comfort with a white woman, because this is supported by the following "This isn't representative of all sisters" therefor the statement is made vague.

Because this simply depends on the class of "Black Women" we are talking about, all black women do not share similar characteristics, and it would not be logical of us to assert such. This will still be a superficial reason because it only describes a few, or many but certainty not most. Also another fallacy that has been committed is "Bias Sample" because this only describes a "Few" black women, it's still not substantial for a good "Reason" to date "White Women", and another fallacy that was also committed is known as "Appeal To Belief", because he asserted the following

"I’m sure "you" know the angry black woman"

The problem with his assertion is that it applies to the reader (Mostly men) this will result into "Personal" situations when dealing with the "Angry" black woman, so this of course would be consider as "Truth" to many people, and since most could relate to this assertion, therefore the claim could be considered "True". :/

3) They understand that a woman can be independent without emasculating every man in her path

"Yes, I know you don’t “need no man to take care of you.” I know that you’re not going to “let no man tell you what to do.” I know you’re not going to bend over backward to make a man happy, or to make him want to be with you. But perhaps there’s something to the idea of making a man feel like a man, especially if you expect your man to make you feel like a woman"

The problem with the above statement once again, does not give a "Good" reason for why a black males should date a white woman, it presents a generalize statement in support of white females, who are understanding, confident, and independent without being overbearing or emasculating the male. This is simply the same fallacy as previous "Appeal To Belief" because most would probably accept this as "Factual" many people would consider it "True", but the issue is much more complex, because i doubt that all white females share a general "Consensus" with one another. So this fallacy is also identified as the "Common Practice", because of the following.

1.White "Women" understand they can be independent without emasculating men.
2.So therefor white women are understandable, and obviously justified.

4) They don’t chase after the thing they hate the most

"We all know this sister. She’s the Halle Berry type, as fine as she can be, but always ends up crying with you at dinner over a glass of wine. Every man she meets starts off as the answer to her prayers and ends up being the devil incarnate. She is approached regularly by nice guys, but finds herself turning them down for the exciting, wealthy, well-dressed, smooth brother who always breaks her heart. Even worse, she ends up with the thugged out, baby-mama-having cheater whom she finds to be irresistible. That’s when she comes to the insightful and consistent conclusion that “black men aint sh*t.”

LMFAO! this has some "Element" of truth to it, but it's a ridiculous generalization, "We all know this sister." ( I DON'T!!! :D) as his statements continues "Every man she meets starts off as the answer to her prayers and ends up being the devil incarnate" Honestly i doubt that many women or perhaps black women comes across a man, who they believe is the answer to her "Prayers" let's be honest here, Black Men and Black Women, or anyone for that matter do not have enough knowledge to make a clear judgment on exactly who they are dating. Dating is all about speculations, being skeptical, and getting to understand the individual. A relationship is much more "Personal" it involves confidence, it involves stability. Women and Men are no more different when it comes to these choices. However men and women, can both have superficial reasons for wanting to date someone, whether it's based on looks, financial income, social status etc. The list continues to go on. Black Men and Women, have both numerous superficial reasons for wanting to date someone, it's seems like the attraction is based more on attention and lust, rather then reason and observation.

The assertion "She is approached regularly by nice guys, but finds herself turning them down for the exciting, wealthy, well-dressed, smooth brother who always breaks her heart. Even worse, she ends up with the thugged out, baby-mama-having cheater whom she finds to be irresistible" The problem with the above statement is simply about the "Caliber" of black women he is describing, because many sisters don't always fall into this category, and if much. there could be a reason why a black woman, may choose the "Thug", or the "Nice Guy", or the "Pretty Boy", there is several numerous factors for this.

1.Social
2.Appearance
3.Attraction

Black Women, who normally would date the so-called "Thug Brothers" mainly are the females who live around these individuals, it's simply their community as the factor, whatever you grew up around is most likely what you would be comfortable with or influenced by.

This is the Social aspect of these choices, the appearance is what they are more comfortable with, and the attraction is simply based on this. in other words it's completely "Physiological", like the attraction that most black men and women, have towards each other. I am in no way justifying the sisters action for dating these horrible black men, but also the assertion doesn't make us look good either, because it leaves black men open to more "Criticism". Because we will be Chastised as the "Cheating, Baby Making, No Good, Smooth-Talking, Long-legged Mack daddies" Us black men, are absolutely no different in this category, a lot of us have been attracted to females simply because she have, nice hips, pretty face, light-skinned, big booty, big breasts etc. Black Men and Women, are no different within this category, we all date for superficial reasons at one point. But as stated previously NOT all or even most black women do not share this view of "Black Men ain't shit" so this fallacy is known as the "Appeal to Consequences of a Belief"

The article is clear with this fallacy,

1."We all know this sister" who is nice looking, who always ends up crying over past relationships or present (I would presume)
2.She is a gullible woman, who believes every man is the answer to her prayers.
3.However she is "Approached" by nice guys on the "Regular", but finds herself turning them down.
4.She is attracted to the smooth-talking guy whose exciting and wealthy, who in returns break her heart.
5. She ends up with the no-good bastard baby-making cheater who is no good.
6. She comes to the conclusion that "Black Men ain't shit"

Anyone see the problem with the above fallacy? this is simply based on belief, and is absolutely fallacious, because we don't know what "Specific" caliber of black women we are dealing with. Because for all we know the bastard baby making cheater could have been the "Regular" guy from the start, or perhaps the "Smooth-Talking" brother who is wealthy (But this is all just speculation). We have absolutely no amount of evidence to make an unstable conclusion, neither does the female who comes to the conclusion that "Black Men" ain't shit. We simply don't know the different characteristics of these individuals. The fact of the matter, that this is a female who has dated or been involved with several different "Men", all who possesses "Individual" characteristics.

The problem i am having, is how do we really define a "Regular" guy? or perhaps how do we define what makes a guy "Regular"? there is no answer to this, because most relationship choices on based on "Attraction". The same thing applies to men, who would come to the conclusion "Black Women ain't shit" (It's all a game of choices, men and women both have no idea who they are getting into a relationship with) So the above reason is once again superficial, and logically inept.

Because i am sure "White Women" do the "Exact" same thing. They just say "White Men ain't shit" ROFLMFAO! :D

5) They don’t worship their pastors and judge their men by church attendance

"Many black women state that they only want a man who is “equally yoked,” which pretty much makes me a bad egg (yes, I always thought the word “yoke” had an “L” in it, which tells you how often I go to church). You really think that a man in the church is more ethical, kind and considerate than the rest of us? Give me a break. Also, some of us wonder why you put your preacher on a pedestal and expect us to do the same. If you only choose men you meet in church, you won’t have much to choose from. In fact, you might just end up sharing the pastor with other women."

This has some element of truth to it, but it's still not a logical reason and also very superficial, because many women in general regardless of race will always want a man to do right in the name of "GOD". (Hispanic Women are often very religious, and many of their men abide by various religious ethnics, as well as many Christian White Women and men) So black women, in this category is absolutely no different, many of them are raised by the church, so their thinking has been altered to fit their "Religious" perspectives and beliefs. This is something that was mainly taught to them as a child, (Mainly from their parents), so of course it's logical to assume why many sisters want a man, who is "God-Fearing" (At least i know i don't fit this criteria, so brother boyce you are not ALONE!!! LMFAO! >:D).

But as for what white women "Do" or "Don't" i would not know this, how does Brother Boyce Watkins know this ( I have absolutely no idea), although he does raise several good points i had asked myself (Being honest here) he asserts the following..

"Also, some of us wonder why you put your preacher on a pedestal and expect us to do the same."

I have date many sisters who are overly religious, so i understand where this question is coming from. (cause I'm not even religious!) though this statement doesn't apply to all black women. His next assertion is....

"If you only choose men you meet in church, you won’t have much to choose from. In fact, you might just end up sharing the pastor with other women"

ROFLMFAOooooOOO!! this is actually funny, not really much to say about this! because its not always true, but it is known about "Mr.Pastor" and his several delusional concubines!

However, his fallacy about what religious standards white women apply to men, is known as "Appeal To Belief" (Once again)

1.Most people believe black women, hold men by religious standards
2.Therefore most black women, hold men by religious standards

1.Most believe that white women, don't hold men by religious standards
2.Therefore most white women, don't hold men by religious standards.

This reason is also superficial.

6) They don’t think that material success and physical attraction are everything

"Never in my life have I valued physical beauty or financial success more than inner beauty. But if you listen to some sisters talk, the entire conversation starts and ends with how good they look, how educated they are, and why no man is smart enough to appreciate it. If you are only judging yourself and other people on shallow and superficial attributes, then you will ultimately have a shallow and superficial life."

The problem i have with this assertion, is that it admits to open honesty. But at the same time neglects it, and still offers a superficial reason. They key statement that stands out is the following assertion "if you listen to "some" sisters talk", at least he is reasonable, which leaves me to make another reasonable conclusion that is perhaps another superficial reason for dating a white woman. (LOL) But however this reason does not apply just to black women, white women are actually known for "Materialism", the prada, the gucci, the luxury, lavish life, hotel suites, penthouse and $200,000.00 cars! you name it! (But this would be an obvious generalization, because this still depends on the caliber of women we are describing, because her skin color should not define her characteristics) So this really shouldn't be a good "Reason", because i am sure white women, have standards set for their mates, and themselves. (Because they are still women). I went to college, (around white people) and white women boast about their "Success" and "Education", and about what type of men they should deserve, and what type of men they don't want! So once again, this is simply a fallacy based on "Belief", appeal to "Popularity", and also "Bias Sample".

Appeal To Belief fallacy.....

1.Many people believe black women, are materialistic driven, and self-absorbed
2.Therefor black women, are materialistic driven and self-absorbed

(Many Black men do the exact same damn thing.)
(Many White Women do the exact same damn thing.)

Appeal To Popularity fallacy.....

1.Many people approve of the materialistic, sophisticated, educated strong black woman, who have achieved success, she only lives by financial and material standards!
2.Therefor this claim is true, because white women don't often talk about it.

Bias Sample fallacy....

1.Some black women are materialistic worshiping idol mongers
2.Therefor black are prone to be materialistic worshiping idol mongers.

Once again, this is just another superficial reason a black man might want to "Consider" dating a white woman!.

7) They don’t consider you a failure if you struggle economically

"The most humiliating thing in the world is a woman who clowns a man for not having enough money or getting his credit card declined. But we all know the sister who does just that. I hate the idea of a woman running to white men because they have more money. Yes, white males have more money, because that’s what happens when you can oppress and rob a group of people for half a millenium. Face it: The average black man is not going to have the same wealth level as the average white man, because white men had a 400 year head start."

Oh shit, LMFAO! i have said this several times, in regards to many sisters who just think it's easy being a black male in this system of "White Supremacy" and not to mention most of the world in general. However this isn't a reason for a black man to actually go off and get a "White Woman" Because the effect of this, would be no different then the cause of black women choosing to date or marry white men for financial stability, we would be still contributing to the images of "White Supremacy" and "Black Inferiority"; almost as we are just not good enough for each other. So both reasons are vague, and superficial and overly shallow. So this is still not a good reason. But the statement has tons of truth to it. (And i don't think this is a good representation of black women, many sisters are aware of this system of white supremacy, and being a black man or black woman, in this system of white supremacy.)

However white women, are capable and many have done the same to their men, for not meeting a certain standards, so once again this is no more then a "Bias Sample". and not really a good reason.

8. They might be willing to self-reflect

"The breakdown of the black family is not solely the fault of the black man. There’s usually a woman in every relationship. Also, if your kids don’t have their father, remember that you may have played a role in pushing the man out of their lives. If you grow up in a home without the male present, you may be tempted to see the man as an accessory rather than a necessity. So, when things get rough, you tell him to hit the road or choose to make life miserable for him. Also, the give and take of relationships is typically learned from watching our parents, so the single parent homes in black America don’t provide a very good incubator for good relationship choices. This goes for both men and women, not just us men."

The title of this reason, is not really a reason because the key word is "Might", however the whole paragraph has no errors, because it does not addresses specifics factors for why black men would really want to "Date" a white woman. However the article addresses the current state of the black community, and the role black men and women played within the current state of it. (I guess brother Boyce's intellectual capacity got the best of him? LMFAO!)

His following article leaves nothing much to critique...

"To conclude, I must apologize to all the good black women across America. But for the bitter, nasty, judgmental, angry, arrogant women on the block, I refuse to apologize. If you were reading the other “8 Reasons” article about black men and finding this to be a justification for your own inability to make a man want to be with you, then you’ll only find yourself perpetually frustrated. You can change the complexion of your love interest, but the consistent variable in your tortured love life is always going to be you."

My Conclusion:

This article, was not near as worse as the critiquing i did on this article. But however brother Boyce Watkins, let the actions of reason define his conclusion, but his rebuttal was in reality more of the same unnecessary rhetoric! because it stills places whites on pedestals! which is just not smart, i am sure he could have found a better rebuttal! as i have demonstrated towards both articles. (Maybe because i'm an Intellectual Ass-hole? or maybe because i'm an Ass-Hole, who also happens to be a Pan-African? or both? LMFAO! >:D) But as stated, an intellectual does not stoop to the levels of others and take part of this "Gender-War" nonsense, i don't defend the actions of those who date inter-racially, or take part in it. I simply do not CARE!, people have various reasons for why they do, many times they have been truly hurt by members of their own race, sometimes they been criticized by their own, sometimes it's "Mental", sometimes it's Self-Hatred, many times it's Superficial, and often many times based on "Lust" and some even do it out of "Open-mindedness" (Whatever that really fucking means?)

But hey? whatever!

8 Reasons to Date a White Man (My Response)

2011-08-11T06:18:00.190-05:00

I have not checked my Hotmail account in just over 2 days, i was sent an article from a friend of my mine; she sent me a link to the website known as Madame Noire the link lead me to an article titled "8 Reasons to Date a White Man". This article was written well over a year ago, during September 27, 2010 by a woman named "LaShaun Williams", she began to list several reasons why Black women should open and expand their options for dating White men. Much of the reasons she listed were very superficial (As with many who promote interracial dating). I personally do not care about interracial dating which is why i never touched the subject, because most black men are with black women, and vice verse. And i honestly do not care who anybody dates or marry, that issue is simply beyond me and beneath my concerns.

I believe the whole problem between Black Men and Women, is completely sociological, economical, and self-induced behaviors cause by the pressures of society. Both black men and women wanting each others to meet up to the standards set by someone else, many of us are motivated only by self-interest; and much of this have lead to the decay of the black community which resulted into a diverse power struggle amongst the two. I outlined this in my article (I am still writing) titled "Black Men Vs Black Women : Animosity of Two Fools". But what's interesting about this article, is that the writer is married to a black man, she specifically stated

"I am married to a Black man—dark-skinned, 100 percent cocoa. To me, there is nothing more physically beautiful on this earth. Notice I said physically. Outside of that, there are plenty of more financially, intellectually and emotionally stable options"

I like how she pointed out the "Physical" aspect and traits and masculinity of black men, which she admitted she is attracted to on a physical level. But she also stated out of this physical attraction to black men, there are "other" financially stabled, intellectually and emotionally options.(Did she married someone she is only physically attracted to, but not on a emotionally, intellectual or financially level?, i have no idea so it's not logical to assume.) Allow me to continue, what she stated..

"It’s time to taste the unknown. There are just too many—too many bright and beautiful single Black women waiting for their Black prince charming, only to see more and more of them riding off with their porcelain-skinned beauties."

The logic behind this is very flawed, (as with most individuals who take part in joining the "Statistical Media") they will always resort to condescending forms of thought to simply express their opinion. Because there are just as many single black men, as there are black women. And her assertion of "Porcelain-Skinned beauties" I.E (White Women, Asian women? or perhaps Lighter Skin "Black" women?) the funny thing about this, is that most black men as i stated who are in relationships are mostly in relationships with black women, and many do not have a dream of marrying a white woman or women of other races. If much, most of us go for what is primarily available for us within our community which is black women. (Since most black men and women live together within the community) So the assertion of "More and more" black men riding off to non-black women is absurd! because it's not as rampant as her assertion make it seems. She continues her message by delivering the following unscrupulous assertion. She also commits a fallacy known as "Biased Sample".

"My question is what are you waiting for—a baby and no ring? Black men are obviously seeing a lot in others they like. As an open-minded woman, I can tell you from experience some things about white are right. In no particular order, here are the reasons you should be giving vanilla a chance."

She proclaimed she is an "Open-Minded" woman, (A grave insult to intellectual thought), but yet this is not the ability of a woman who is well socially tenable. she outright asserts "What are you waiting for-a baby and no ring? black men are obviously seeing a lot in others they like". The article she is presenting to the reader is cunning and "Persuasive" which is not reasonable to those who are searching for a "Compatible" mate. She expresses her view of black men impregnating black women, and not marrying them but impregnating women of other races and marrying them; thus the reflection of this article will persuade black women to date white men to avoid this from happening. As if this condition is something primarily attributed to only black men. The logic behind here is indefensible, she presents her argument in a tenable manner. It is open to criticism and reflects inexcusable reasoning. (Hence: why I am critiquing it). This fallacy is known as "Bias Sample", she has already expressed her "Bias" views when she asserted "what are you waiting for a baby and no ring?" she has expressed prejudice views on many of "Black Women" who have had children out of wedlock, by black men. So I guess it is logical to persuade black women to date white men for a "Superficial" bias and prejudged illogical reason just because of her prejudice and irrational point of view. (As if she knows most Black Women "Personal situation" which I highly doubt)

Please Note: (I have in no way, misrepresented the following writers previous proponents, everything i have stated is based on empirical analyzes to utilize the methods of inductive and deductive reasoning.)

Now she presents herself giving the following reasons for why "White Men" are (I presume) better choices for Black Women.

1.They open wide instead of down low

"Gay White men tend to be more forthcoming about their sexuality with family and friends. The down low phenomenon is less prevalent, which preserves the battery usage on your gaydar and relieves the stress of dissecting every male relationship."

First off, she has committed a "Logical Fallacy" known as the "Red Herring Fallacy" The article should be guided towards "Heterosexual" black women, who choose to date "Heterosexual" white men. What does being "Homosexual" white male, have to do with finding a suitable mate for "Heterosexual" black women?; She also stated that "gay white men tend to be more forthcoming about their sexuality with their family" (How does she know this exactly? i have absolutely no idea!) the assertion by logic is a "Stereotype" and once again, i doubt any black women would be wanting to date an open "Homosexual" White male to begin with. (So that issue is irrelevant) She states the "Down low" phenomenon is less prevalent, (In other words most black men, who are gay are most likely in the closet, maybe she haven't been to Atlanta?) the problem with this assertion is, I doubt she have ever met most gay white males, or most gay black males (Or black males who are in the closet) to come to this irrational unstable conclusion.

The outcome is simply based on a stereotype of the "Down low" brother. So she assumes that "All" white men who are gay, are not on the down low; this fallacy is known as "Appeal To Belief", she believes (what many other believe about black men who are "Homosexuals" that they are on the down low) Now there is absolutely no way, to "believe" this is "Fact". The only conclusion she draws out is based on "Speculation" that "White Men are more open with their sexuality" (Maybe because they are the majority?) however this position is still not logical; so why do she jump to this ridiculous conclusion and support this claim with "Pseudo-Reasoning"? (I have absolutely no idea) She once again expresses the fallacy known as "Bias Sample". The 1st reason for dating "White Men" is simply a "Generalization" based on a Pre-conceived notion, how is this a logical reason? i have absolutely no idea.

Her second reason....

2. Not looking for someone to take care of them

"Thanks to the absence of family, fathers and marriage in the Black community, a great number of our men have backward expectations when it comes to romantic relationships. A higher percentage of White men come from stronger family structures and more traditional gender roles, where the men seek to care for the women."

First off where does she get this idea that "Black Men" want "Black Women" to take care of them? and where does she jump to this enormous conclusion that there are "White Men" who are not getting taken "Care" of by their spouse? that fallacy is know as "Bias Sample" (Once again) She specifically stated "Thanks to the absence of family, fathers and marriage within the black community, a great number of our men have backwards expectations when it comes to romantic relationships" But she fail to give any amount of evidence, or "Statistical" data for this assertion.

This fallacy is also known as "Questionable Cause" she presents the argument in a condescending manner to support her reasons for dating "White Men" (That's very manipulative) she asserts the problems of, absent fathers, lack of marriage and absence of family morals within "Black Men" (Generalization) is a good reason for dating "White Men", she specifically stated that we have "Backward" expectations when it comes to marriage. (As if she knows most black men reject marriage, and if most black women want to get married?), she neither do i have absolutely no idea what goes on into the lives of "INDIVIDUAL" black men and women). So how does she jump to this unstable conclusion, that have absolutely no weight.

She has absolutely dismiss several factors within the black communities that could be the reason for the lack of structure and marriage within the black communities. Such as poverty, drugs, alcohol, infrastructure, economical hardships and sociological endangerment etc. All which plays a huge factor within the black communities. She draws another conclusion that white men (generalization) comes from a more structured home and traditional gender roles as oppose to black men (One reason could be because many whites come from a far more economically and financially stabled communities as opposed to most black communities today).

And she also says that white men seek to care for their women (Generalization) I doubt she even knows all white men, and most black men for that ridiculous claim. As I stated previously her fallacy is a "Questionable Cause" she is drawing conclusions based on the lack of, or insufficient evidence to support this absurd claim. And she also commits her previous "Famous" fallacy known as "Biased Sample" (smdh)

3. Attend and graduate from college

"Black women are graduating from college and Black men continue to drop out. As a result, degrees become intimidating when dating Black men. In White culture, education is valued and expected. Thus, White men have no problem dating educated women with advanced degrees. It is impressive rather than intimidating."

Wow? well I graduated with an associates degree, and I am getting a bachelors in a few months, and then I will be on my way to earning a doctorates. (But of course I'm not cut out for it). Once again she has expressed bias views, and have not offered absolutely no statistical data for her claims (Not LOGICAL). She expresses once again a condescending way to "Persuade" the reader (Black Women) to seek out white men, because black women graduate more often then black men, and we drop out! and we are intimidated by "Educated Women" Now tell me is that not a superficial, illogical, self-egotistical, generalized, bias assertion? (I don't even know most educated black women with degrees). And I highly doubt that black men are intimidated by "Educated Women", I think many men want an intelligent woman, why are only white men an exception to this rule? However she specifically goes right back to her famous fallacy known as "Bias Sample" (smdh)

She also commits a fallacy known as "Appeal To Tradition" by specifically stating "In White culture, education is valued and expected." first of all what is a "White Culture"? (White people have various cultural differences) But more or less, she commits this fallacy known as "Appeal To Tradition" by stating that education is valued within "White Culture" (In other words) education is not valued within black culture (As if we have no educational standards ourselves?) she supports this argument by stating "thus White men have no problem dating educated women with advanced degrees" (She does not know most white men, another generalization, where does she get this claim i have absolutely no idea.) She supports her fallacy by the following...

1. white culture is based on education, and more traditional values
2. therefor white men love women with education and advanced degrees because of traditional white culture.

(Do anyone see the problem with this? this is not reasonable and not logical)

Once again her argument is made vague, prejudiced, opinionated, generalized and gloriously absurd.

4. At least attempt to marry before making babies

For whatever reason, White men just don’t have children sprinkled all over the world like Black men. And, if they do, most of them were married to the mother at some point. Sure, they divorce but you can only divorce if you at least attempt a marriage.

The author of this article position and view of black men is very clear, (Who is supposedly married to a black man) She has stated that "White men don't have children sprinkled all over the world like black men" (Maybe she forgot about Brazil?, and several other countries where European invaders and Conquerors mated with native populations, primarily with the Women) I highly doubt that "Black Men" (Which is at least 3-400 million men globally) are spreading their seed around the "World" (Or is she specifically talking about African-American men?, that i highly doubt too) My problem with this author is where does she jump to these unrealistic and unstable conclusions? where does she get her facts from? And once again her fallacy is expressed as a "Bias Sample" she does not know how many children are produced around the world by White Men, neither does she know this by Black Men. This is simply an Argument from Ignorance, (Lacking in literal knowledge)

She continues her fallacy by stating "if they do, most of them were married to the mother at some point." (Once again, how does the author know this?, Is she notified by some sort of White-Male population contribution instant messenger application installed within her smart phone?) She does a better job then White Men, keeping up with their global expansion, not to mention she does it without proof (That's smart) her fallacy is known as "Appeal To Popularity" she assume that white men don't have children around the world, and if they do, they were most likely married to the mother, because this claim would be more "Inclined" as truth, it is logical to "Assume" that this claim is true, and black men are seed spreaders, who are not capable of marriage. Once gain, she is using a "Persuasive" tendency, to mislead the reader.

"Sure, they divorce but you can only divorce if you at least attempt a marriage."

^Her following assertion does not make any logical sense; because you can only "Divorce" if you are married, there is no "Attempt" or "Least", you have marriage = 2, (Together) and then you have divorce = 1. (Separated) Once again, the reader presents a bias assertion to mislead the reader.

5. They don’t glamorize ignorance

They may listen to rap music, but they are smart enough not to act it out. The “thug life” is not something to be aspired. White men have a firmer grasp on what really defines manhood.

Once again, the author presents a "Bias Sample" she have offered absolutely no proof for this assertion, for the simple fact "Hip-Hop" does not represent all black males. And she has no evidence to support her theory of White Men not conforming to these standards. And how does a woman speak for the definition of "Manhood" which itself is a game of "Semantics", man-hood can only be defined by a "Man". It's like a man trying to define the nature of women, it's simply all "Perception" you would not know because you are not a "Male". Her fallacy is known as the "Appeal To Ridicule", she insults black men by saying they are not intelligent enough because they act out "Hip-Hop" (I had no idea you can act out hip-hop, can i act out R&B?) wheres White men, may listen to hip-hop but are intelligent enough to not act it out. Well how do she explain this guy?....

LMFAO! I wonder what is her opinion of him? but yet she gives another "Superficial" reason for why black women should choose white men. But according to her generalization, white men don't glamorize "Ignorance" as if ignorance comes in a specific "Color", that happens to be "Black". (Smdh)

6. Financial planning and stability

Black people, especially men, are always trying to shine—often spending more money than they have. White men tend to be more educated in the area of finance with a greater understanding of retirement planning, savings, investments, etc. This is mostly due to a higher level of exposure and teaching, but all that matters is they know and make better decisions than Black men when it comes to managing money.

Once again, she continues to persuade the reader with misleading information (Not that white men don't make more money then black men, because everybody knows that! LMFAO!) but she presents black men as being materialistic individuals who are trying to get our "Shine" own, but she has dismissed the fortune 500 buildings, global expansions, luxury cars, expensive "Italian" suits, Diamond laced Rolex watches, European capitalistic control societies, corporate offices, and mass media product marketing, global engineering, and the current economical defunct that is currently being exploited, because all these are simply product of "White men trying to get their shine own". :/

But of course White Men, are more smarter when it comes to "Finance", well that same argument can be made towards the black community in general who spends over 2 billion dollars a year in consumed and imported goods (That includes both black men and women), but once again, the reader commits the usual fallacies of "Appeal To Popularity" and "Appeal To Flattery" she expressed her own "Materialistic" individual self-driven motives based on White Males accumulative wealth, something you cannot compare black men with. (Where has she been? does she know history?) But also black men don't plan or save money, (I guess i am an exception to the rule?)and we obviously don't know when to "Retire" or have a real good understanding of "Retirement Planning" (But at least we still wanna work). But of course as the "Author" stated... "All that matter is they know financially planning better then black men" (I would love to see how much she knows?, so far absolutely nothing.) because this assertion gives you good insight about the authors thoughts. She's obviously been drinking the "Kool-Aid"

7. Have the ability to look beyond your past

"Ever wonder why White people can date the friends of exes and so on? It’s because they don’t let the past hinder the present. Promiscuous Black men think they deserve to settle down with virgins, and allow past relationships to haunt the present. Not White men. They have no problem turning a hoe into a housewife."

Once again, the author has expressed her "Opinion" to mislead the reader, first of all i am someone who have once dated the EX of a friend, hell i even had mad feelings for her, and yes she had a "Past" (Something i will not go into detail about) but guess what? i took her in, i could care about her past, hell i actually "Loved" her (No Lie) but she broke up with me lmfao (Slap in my face).

And i know many brothers out here who date females who have a "Past", but yet the author of this article (Being a woman) uses a "Double Standard" (Another logical fallacy) to describe the "Promiscuous" tactics of various Black men, as if Black Women are saints. Promiscuity is not limited to Black men, if much i can contend that Whites actually do it more, (I know because i went to college with them), she makes it seems like White Men don't have a fond for virgins? (How does she know this?) but yet she is obligated to express an irrational and vague opinion about black men wanting virgins. I live in the black community, and i highly doubt "Promiscuous" black men think they "Deserve" some virgins (I wouldn't know what they think, so what gives her the right? such arrogance). Her fallacy is known as "Appeal To Emotion" she is trying to manipulate the "Female" reader's emotions (Black Women) to accept this claim as "Truth" so in return black women will run searching for the "Pure White" guy with no sins to bury.

She has so much knowledge about "White People" that she even resorts to displaying this level of arrogance by stating "White people have no problem dating Exes" (Once again how does she know this? where is the App for this kind of information? LMFAO) but she knows "Black Men have a problem with dating Ex's" (She's is obviously talking from a personal opinion, which her interaction with some black men, does not describe a vast or even half percentage of black men) and also, I doubt that most men, regardless White/European, Black/African, or Asian have dreams of "Turning A Hoe Into A House Wife", most men, want a woman who have not been passed around more then the Heisman trophy. So why is she is so righteous and opinionated?

NOTE: (Did anyone notice, how she defended the women who are "Hoes", but yet slams the "Promiscuous" men?, such hypocrisy, she doesn't deserve to tell black women "Who they should date")

As stated her opinion, is vague, ignorant, and gloriously absurd! she has been drinking too much "Kool-Aid", i loss count of the logical fallacies she has committed. (Number check please?)

8. Don’t take everything as a challenge to their masculinity

"Intimidation and insecurity are two reasons for the rift between Black men and women. As a result of their insecurities and low self-esteem, Black men are intimidated by the strength of an educated and ambitious Black woman. Rather than seeing her as a strong teammate, she is a threat to their manhood. Thus, they feel the need to overcompensate. White men, on the other hand, are more secure. What Black men see as threatening is what makes a great wife and business partner to them."

Wow, she continues with her vague reality, and distorted point of view, and honestly it's funny and sickening how many women agreed with her (But she had a whole bunch of sisters who disagreed, i see why). But as with many individuals who blog about "Interracial" dating towards a specific group, rather it be black, white (Most of the times, it's about Black, White) People always expressed "Superficial" reasons, and absurd assumptions, which is not rational, and not logical. Men regardless of color, take many things as a challenge to their "Masculinity" (Since she seems to know so much about black men), we don't vary too much different from any other men, we come in all shapes and all sizes, and have different traits.

But of course to her "Narrow-Minded" point of view black men are "Insecure" and "Intimidated" by the strength of an educated and ambitious black woman. (Says the woman, who bashes men for not trying to turn a hoe into a "Housewife") should black women, really accept the superficial, bias, prejudice and vague reasons for dating a White man? But once again the author commits a number of fallacies, Bias Sample (Her Famous one) she commits the fallacy known as "Appeal To Emotion" (Once again) trying to manipulate "Black Women" by stating "Black men are insecure, and are intimidated by a strong black woman, with an education" (In reality she must be intimidated by black men, to make such a ridiculous statement).

Her appeal to "Emotion" fallacy is supported by the following, according to her opinion, "Insecurity, and Intimidation" is one of the biggest reasons for the silly "Gender War" (To her perspective, and many of the other loons who believe her)

1.Black Men's "Masculinity" enables them to be insecure, and intimidated by a strong black woman, with an education.

2.Our "Masculinity" clouds our judgment and enables us to "Overcompensate"

3.Therefor this is a reason to date White Men (Claps)

Also this fallacy is known as "Composition" she asserts that Black Men who are intimidated by a "Strong' educated black woman, see her as a threat to their manhood, therefor this is a reason to date "White Men" (Once again this woman does not know all black men, and she damn sure does not know all white men, what ignorance!) This fallacy is supported by her following....

1. Black Men's masculinity enables them to be insecure and intimidated by,strength, education and ambitious black women
2.So therefore black men are insecure because these reasons. (LMFAO, the logic here is glorious!)

She then expresses the last of her arrogance assertion with the following statement (Drum Roll)

"White men, on the other hand, are more secure. What Black men see as threatening is what makes a great wife and business partner to them."

The remaining problem here is obvious, as with her whole statement, it's logically contradictory, bias, prejudice, arrogant, ignorant and personally opinionated. (A "Black" woman actually wrote this?, whew we are in a deep sleep) She once again expresses the following fallacies, Composition, Bias Sample, and the Appeal to Popularity, because it would be more often "Inclined" that the following is true, because White men can't do no wrong. ( According to the world today, and black men are just mentally shut) whatever.....

Closing Comments: Listen up Black/African men and women within America, you all put so much effort in ridiculing and downsizing each other, based on gender, light skin - dark skin, long hair - good hair, and useless trivial matters such as "Interracial" dating and the propaganda that comes with it, you all buy into the media and accept false information as rational and substantial "Truth". I however along with many of my REAL brothers and sisters are deeply insulted by this current generation of black men and women, who display this amount of arrogance and ignorance towards each other, and result into articles such as this. It's funny how we can dedicate much of our time to uplifting "White People" and not our own. It's funny how we can talk about "Interracial Dating' but not talk about "Black Unity" and a Pan-African economical system that will help benefit our people.

When black people on a global scale are underdeveloped, lacking education! and wasting our time trying to become "Equals" in a System of White Supremacy, but yet you Negros will sit back and scream "Racism doesn't exist, we are equals now" or "We got a black president" or perhaps "I'm not African, i'm American". you will create articles about "Why you should date white women" or "Date white men" or in general date outside your race, because you don't want to help fix the current problems within your "Race", you are a selfish individual, and your only motivation is "Self-Interest" you are one of the reasons why the black communities are in the condition they are in, your arrogance of placing "Whites" above YOUR OWN! shows how "Brainwashed" you Negroes are!, you are being "Culturally Assimilated" and you don't even KNOW it, but it's not the matter of "Knowing" it, it's primarily because you want to be "Americanized" you don't care for the development of your people, you don't care, or love black men and women, you all are APART OF THE PROBLEM!, if you are not for Black Unity, then don't associate yourselves with black people. you are a cancer, that needs to be put in remission or removed, though i suggest the latter!, because we don't need your "Coonery" coming back!

STOP DRINKING THE FUCKING KOOL-AID AND WAKE THE FUCK UP!!!!!

Today is my 22nd Birthday Aug 2nd!!

2011-08-02T06:56:00.000-05:00

Well today is officially my birthday, and before you know, i will be a much older man as time progresses. Hopefully i would have most of my goals accomplished before i am 50, i just don't want to spend my time doing things meaningless especially if their is no guarantee i will benefit from it in the end.

Well anyways, i have a date later on tonight, hehehe leave b-day comments! ttyl folks!

DeRacialized: The White Beauty Myth

2011-07-10T22:02:00.003-05:00

Sad...sad...sad....

What has happen to this Generation Y of Black People? PT: 1

2011-07-01T16:41:00.005-05:00

This current generation of black people, "Generation Y" takes on after the previous "Generation X", this current generation that i am apart of, is absolutely unconscious.I ponder what goes on in the head of my fellow brothers and sisters, and i honestly do not think i can call them even that. I will show you a couple of pictures i have found throughout the internet so you can honestly see there is a dramatically huge difference, between Africans In America of today then yesterday. I will elaborate more on this "Generation Y" later, but for now look where i am going with this.

These were the many Black Men, of yesterday.

These are many of the Black Men today.

Out of our goddamn minds....

These are the many Black Women of yesterday.

These are many of the Black Women today.

Out of our goddamn minds.....

This is how our children are suppose to look!

This is not how our children are suppose to look!!

Yes, i know exactly what you are thinking just horrible....horrible poor baby!

As you can see from the above pictures, alot has dramatically changed we have regressed back into this slave buffoonish mentality. This current generation and last generation are mentally fucked. It's like we are in the Twilight Zone! As i stated i will continue to elaborate on this topic further. But here's something to think about, if this current generation Y is the way it is. Then what is the future for the next generation? ask yourself do we really have another 50 years?