<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Music on Rails</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.song-list.net</link>
	<description />
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/MusicOnRails" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>WordPress Hack</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/26/wordpress-hack/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/26/wordpress-hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 06:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It turned out that the upgrade did not solve the problem as it was header.php in my theme that was modified to include a &#60;u&#62;  element with display:none  that included a long list of bad links. (see excerpt at http://www.pastie.org/223173 ).
I assume it happened via sql injection that I hope had been resolved [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It turned out that the upgrade did not solve the problem as it was header.php in my theme that was modified to include a &lt;u&gt;  element with display:none  that included a long list of bad links. (see excerpt at <a href="http://www.pastie.org/223173">http://www.pastie.org/223173</a> ).</p>
<p>I assume it happened via sql injection that I hope had been resolved in WordPress 2.5.1</p>
<p><span style="display: none; text-decoration: underline;">I assume it got in via sql injection that the new version has solved.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/26/wordpress-hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hacked</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/25/hacked/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/25/hacked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[song-list]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This blog has been hacked in a very peculiar way. See the summaries for the various blog entries on Google:

Google&#8217;s cache and the pages themselves seem &#8220;clean&#8221;  - no mention of various drugs and such and no &#8220;bad&#8221; links. So I am unsure what is the benefit to the hackers. In any case I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog has been hacked in a very peculiar way. See the summaries for the various blog entries on Google:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.song-list.net/wp-content/uploads/screenshot-hacked.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-27" title="Song List Blog on Google" src="http://blog.song-list.net/wp-content/uploads/screenshot-hacked-300x257.png" alt="" width="300" height="257" /></a></p>
<p>Google&#8217;s cache and the pages themselves seem &#8220;clean&#8221;  - no mention of various drugs and such and no &#8220;bad&#8221; links. So I am unsure what is the benefit to the hackers. In any case I used this as an opportunity to upgrade to WP 2.5.1.</p>
<p>Hopefully the problem will go away when Google &amp; Yahoo  reindex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/06/25/hacked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Mood Swings</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/01/30/google-mood-swings/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/01/30/google-mood-swings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/2008/01/30/google-mood-swings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned this in an earlier post about how the site&#8217;s traffic from google has wild fluctuations without any significant change to the site.
Overall the traffic to the site has been growing as a result of additional content, but I have periods that the traffic dries to practically zero only to rebound again. Its not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned this in an earlier post about how the site&#8217;s traffic from google has wild fluctuations without any significant change to the site.</p>
<p>Overall the traffic to the site has been growing as a result of additional content, but I have periods that the traffic dries to practically zero only to rebound again. Its not that the pages are not indexed - they <strong>are</strong>, but for some reason during the &#8220;dry spells&#8221; they are buried deep in the search results.  Take a look at this report from google analytics:</p>
<p><a class="imagelink" title="Google Analytics Report" href="http://blog.song-list.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ga-graph.jpg"><img id="image18" src="http://blog.song-list.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ga-graph.jpg" alt="Google Analytics Report" /></a></p>
<p>As you can see every so often the traffic drops significantly - usually for a few days, but in December this lasted for about two weeks. In these periods the site &#8220;practically&#8221; vanishes from search results (though as I mentioned the pages are all indexed and can be found if searching for them specifically).</p>
<p>No particular keyword contributes more than 1% of total traffic to the site, but I do  track a couple of keywords which warn me of this phenomena : &#8220;song list&#8221; is usually ranked in the #2 or #3 spot , but during the Google &#8220;mood swing&#8221; it is not in the 1st 1000 results.</p>
<p>If you visit Google&#8217;s webmaster central forums. Many complain about a drop in their ranking for a particular keyword  from top page to &#8220;buried&#8221;. The response from the participants (mostly conjectures, since most of Google&#8217;s methods are not public) is that something is &#8220;wrong&#8221; with the site: bad linking, non valid markup, bad practices etc&#8230;.</p>
<p>This does not seem to apply to song-list.net, since (a) I do not change anything substantial on the site apart from adding content and (b) If  I have done something &#8220;bad&#8221; in Google&#8217;s eyes then the ranking/traffic would not  rebound back.</p>
<p>Even if Google continuously tweaks the search algorithm continuously why would it cause such enormous fluctuations. I can understand that the ranking for a  particular keyword could fluctuate considerably , but not <strong>all</strong> keyword would fluctuate.</p>
<p>Anyone care to postulate what is happening ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2008/01/30/google-mood-swings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Integrated “Share This”</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/08/19/integrated-share-this/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/08/19/integrated-share-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/2007/08/19/integrated-share-this/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I installed the &#8220;Share This&#8221; Plugin by Alex King on this web site. I thought it maybe nice to have this work on the main site for the various song lists. What I really liked was that it was a javascript pop-up that also worked when javascript was off via a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago I installed the <a title="Share This" href="http://alexking.org/projects/wordpress/">&#8220;Share This&#8221; Plugin by Alex King</a> on this web site. I thought it maybe nice to have this work on the main site for the various song lists. What I really liked was that it was a javascript pop-up that also worked when javascript was off via a dedicated page.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a fairly dirty conversion to rails. The original used the Wordpress internal code to call the mailer so I&#8217;ve added a controller to call ActionMailer, the same controller is responsible for the non-javascript page. As usual most of the time went into layout and CSS issues <img src='http://blog.song-list.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Maybe sometime I&#8217;ll clean it up and re-release it as a rails generator, but we&#8217;ll see if I get to it - I am drowning with lots of things to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/08/19/integrated-share-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Release</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/31/new-release/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/31/new-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[song-list]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally I&#8217;ve upgraded to Rails 1.2.2 with a new database (now around 3100 artists) and added DVD and Book boxes to the song list page.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally I&#8217;ve upgraded to Rails 1.2.2 with a new database (now around 3100 artists) and added DVD and Book boxes to the song list page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/31/new-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs. Yahoo Redeux</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/23/google-vs-yahoo-redeux/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/23/google-vs-yahoo-redeux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 06:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost immediately after my last post, Google traffic plummeted by about 80% - was anyone reading the blog ??? ;-), so the majority of traffic is now coming from Yahoo even though it has indexed much less of the site. The Google bot still visits much more aggressively than  Yahoo slurper. I am very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost immediately after my last post, Google traffic plummeted by about 80% - was anyone reading the blog ??? ;-), so the majority of traffic is now coming from Yahoo even though it has indexed much less of the site. The Google bot still visits much more aggressively than  Yahoo slurper. I am very curious as to the cause of the drop in traffic - most of the hits before and after are from pages in the supplemental index and I cannot imagine that the distribution of queries has changed. The different behavior is just about 4 weeks old - I am just working on other things, waiting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/05/23/google-vs-yahoo-redeux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs. Yahoo</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/04/27/google-vs-yahoo/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/04/27/google-vs-yahoo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My traffic currently is split about evenly between Google and Yahoo (both bringing about 40%). The way they bring traffic is totally different. The Yahoo traffic is directed whereas Google&#8217;s traffic is much more random. Let me elaborate.
I track both the artist pages and the total site pages (they are mostly individual track pages) that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My traffic currently is split about evenly between Google and Yahoo (both bringing about 40%). The way they bring traffic is totally different. The Yahoo traffic is directed whereas Google&#8217;s traffic is much more random. Let me elaborate.</p>
<p>I track both the artist pages and the total site pages (they are mostly individual track pages) that are indexed by both engines. Here is today&#8217;s report:</p>
<ul>
<li>Google: 2,130 artist pages out of 89,900 total</li>
<li>Yahoo: 457 artist pages out of 2,852 total</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see Google has indexed 30 times more pages than Yahoo ! It is easy to see that also from the logs - Google&#8217;s Bot is extremely aggressive - it spiders the site all day - last week it hit 20,000 pages in one day. Yahoo Slurps at a more casual rate - a few hundred to a thousand pages  - dependent on its mood ;-).</p>
<p>One would think that Google would dominate the traffic, but this is not the case. Here are a few keyword hits from both engines:</p>
<p><strong>Yahoo:</strong></p>
<p>list of 50 cent songs<br />
celine dion list of songs<br />
list of ray charles song<br />
list of eric clapton songs<br />
list of jay z songs<br />
lil jon songs</p>
<p><strong>Google:</strong></p>
<p>www.song play.com<br />
theclarksisters<br />
HECTOR LAVOE.COM<br />
morcheeba songlist<br />
&#8220;soft by boney james&#8221;<br />
le notti di cabiria rota listen<br />
&#8220;song of delilah&#8221;<br />
THEHAPPYGOODMAN<br />
Songlist Farewell Angelina<br />
cunla song wikipedia<br />
lil boosie distant lover</p>
<p>The Yahoo traffic comes primarily from searchers that are looking for song lists and the site ranks well for these searches as I would hope. Google&#8217;s traffic is coming from particular word combinations that match certain pages very well even if they are hidden in the supplemental index. I hope that the main artist pages will get indexed in the main index and ranked reasonably so I will get the same kind of hits from Google that I am getting from Yahoo. I am sure many people are searching for &#8221; [artist name] song  list&#8221;, but the site does not pop up in the first few pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/04/27/google-vs-yahoo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I’ve been slashdotted !!!!!!!</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/11/ive-been-slashdotted/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/11/ive-been-slashdotted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s official - Song List is part of web 2.0. I&#8217;ve been slashdotted here.  The torrent was hard to withstand&#8230; a total of 10 hits!  Nonetheless - a milestone.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s official - Song List is part of web 2.0. I&#8217;ve been slashdotted <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=225962&#038;cid=18298606">here</a>.  The torrent was hard to withstand&#8230; a total of 10 hits! <img src='http://blog.song-list.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> Nonetheless - a milestone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/11/ive-been-slashdotted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>External Links</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/07/external-links/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/07/external-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 05:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have interest in seeing how the site is being used.  The logs and google analytics give a very nice snapshot of that. What I don&#8217;t get is visibility to the clicks to external sites. With Google Analytics you can instrument click-outs but you need to add Onclick javascript code to each link.
So.. I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have interest in seeing how the site is being used.  The logs and google analytics give a very nice snapshot of that. What I don&#8217;t get is visibility to the clicks to external sites. With Google Analytics you can instrument click-outs but you need to add Onclick javascript code to each link.<br />
So.. I added a level of indirection. Now when the users click on an online music store icon - it comes back to the Song List controller. For example:</p>
<p>http://www.song-list.net/mp3/itunes/949650/949525</p>
<p>The MP3 action then redirects to the appropriate music library (in this case itunes). I keep all the neccesary information in the url so the controller doesn&#8217;t need to do a database call. I&#8217;ve seen some shopping sites do the same only the real link is transmitted via a key - requiring a DB call, and taking much more time.<br />
Now I can see in the logs which music libraries get clicked more often (answer: so far it is Rhapsody).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/07/external-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Crossed the 2000 Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/04/crossed-the-2000-mark/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/04/crossed-the-2000-mark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 02:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[song-list]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.song-list.net/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just released a new version of the database. There are now over 2,000 artists listed. This is of course just a drop in the sea of available music.
I&#8217;ve started a new job, so I have a limited amount of time to enhance the site and collect more data. At the moment I am trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just released a new version of the database. There are now over 2,000 artists listed. This is of course just a drop in the sea of available music.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve started a new job, so I have a limited amount of time to enhance the site and collect more data. At the moment I am trying to get the current content indexed a bit better by google and yahoo. This has been challenging - more in a future post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.song-list.net/2007/03/04/crossed-the-2000-mark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.569 seconds -->
