Musings From the Mind of a Nerd

Perhaps a New Direction is Needed

2011-08-04T02:20:00.001-04:00

What if I've been going about life all wrong? Thinking about it in the wrong way?

I've always seemed to say to myself that my life is better because.....

I don't drink a beer on a weekday, and it keeps me out of trouble.

I don't often cavort with the fairer sex, and I avoid problems.

I stay out of trouble, so people see me as straightlaced.

I......

I think I'm wrong. Maybe I shouldn't avoid problems. Maybe I should embrace them. Maybe, just maybe, they'll make life more worth living.

http://www.tumblr.com/tumblelog/w1n5ton

Culturally Biased

2011-02-16T19:22:00.001-05:00

via hijinksensue.com

It's only fair. I want to be wired in to the It's Academic buzzers.....

Why isn't life in slow motion?

2011-02-13T13:14:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

Inside the Secret Service

2011-02-10T23:50:00.001-05:00

via theatlantic.com

Whatever they show in the movies isn't even close to reality.

Slow Motion?

2011-02-10T20:25:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

Some of this video looks like it was artificially slowed. There's no way a model plane could get airborne while barely moving forwards, is there? Yes, actually there is.
Look at the craftsmanship of the hollow parts made out of hand-rolled balsa veneer. It's about as light as wood can get and still be wood.

He Really is the most interesting man in the world.

2011-02-09T07:13:00.001-05:00

via newyorker.com

And he's jewish. Surprised?

Like the Site Says

2011-02-07T16:26:00.001-05:00

via christian-stoll.com

These photos are epic. Simply astounding in scale.

With the lockout looming.....

2011-02-06T23:04:00.001-05:00

via newyorker.com

Isn't it ironic that the team without an owner has won the Super Bowl? I think so.

Banksy. Yup.

2011-02-06T13:25:00.001-05:00

via banksy.co.uk

The introduction that was based on these storyboards is the best couch 'gag' I've seen from nearly 30 years of the Simpsons. Not that it was funny, but it was poignant.

Buildings Worthy of '70's Sci-Fi

2011-02-05T11:44:00.001-05:00

via gizmodo.com

They're not just worthy of the sci-fi, they’ve appeared in many sci-fi films of the past 25 years.

Hidden Messages are everywhere

2011-02-05T11:31:00.001-05:00

via splitsider.com

Even the Simpsons have hidden things. An entire movie, perhaps?

The Glass Eye Maker on Vimeo

2011-02-03T23:42:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

No comment is necessary

On the PS2

2011-02-03T21:49:00.001-05:00

via kotaku.com

The PS2 will not die, says this article. This brings up a few very salient points. Sony is both the breakout hit and the unbelievable flop of last decade.
Somehow, they did so well with the PS2. It was an instant hit, such that everyone was playing catchup. It was inexpensive from launch, and now sits at a $99 MSRP - and often sells for less than that. It was a DVD player when nobody had them, and extremely powerful to boot. How could Sony get the PS3 so wrong?
The answer is that they didn’t. Yes, the PS3 was too expensive at launch, but that isn’t why it hasn’t sold as well as hoped. It’s because the PS2 was simply so dominant. When the PS3 came out, the PS2 hadn’t even enjoyed its last hit, in God of War II. The PS2 was so dominant that it was the bestselling console into 2008, two years after it had been replaced, and three years after the XBOX 360 had been released.
Because of this, PS2 owners didn’t see a need to buy a PS3, while the owners of the O.G. XBOX longed for an upgrade. Momentum was shifted to Microsoft’s console, and the rest is history.
Meanwhile, Sony has quietly continued to pump out the PS2 - turning it into a downmarket embedded console for kids. It’s now found in backseat DVD systems and inexpensive TVs. They’ve sold more units than any other game system in history - 150 Million. The PS3 is five years into its lifecycle - middle aged. And it’s only just starting to build the momentum that it should have had from the start. Playstation, as an experiment for Sony, is most likely extremely profitable. Selling nearly $100 million - in consoles that were outclassed years ago - should help with that. And that’s not counting the games. I’d like to see some statistics for the back catalogs of PS2 games vs. the PS3’s older titles. Anyone want to bet that SCEA sells more copies of God of War II in a month than they do of Motorstorm 2?
I am.
The PS2 has surpassed the N64 and the SuperNintendo as the greatest game console of all time. It’s a darn shame nobody realizes it.
I still miss my PS2. Last I heard it was in a box in the basement of a friend - who got 3 years of use out of it after my PS3 came along.
What a machine.

Nothing is Original.....even this

2011-02-02T22:18:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

A harrowing, historic week in Egypt

2011-02-02T18:17:00.001-05:00

via boston.com

The Big Picture is one of the best curated collections of photographs in the world.

It's a rainbow of cheese!

2011-02-02T15:27:00.001-05:00

via wired.com

400,000 square feet of your lunchables, stored in a semi-active mine.

The Headline isn't the biggest news.

2011-01-31T16:09:00.001-05:00

via tuaw.com

This graph has been making the rounds this afternoon, under the headline “Apple trumps competition in profit.” But that’s not the most interesting takeaway from the graph. RIM, found just below Apple, has increased in profit share over the past four years. Let’s note that this has come as they’ve lost marketshare to Android and iPhones over that same period. With a 25% reduction in their volume, how have their profits gone up? It’s not the new devices they’re releasing, the last Blackberry that was a ‘hit’ was the original Bold, which went on sale in early 2008. Ever since, the top-level blackberries have flopped - the Storm 2, the Torch, et al. But the low end Blackberry Curve is selling in the millions. And although the curve has a new, swoopy case, and a trick touchpad to replace the rolling ball, the underlying architecture and OS are the same ones launched with the first Curve, back in 2007. The costs for the development and the chips have long been amortized through the sales of hundreds of millions of devices. The list price of a Curve is somewhere near $400, and nearly all of that is profit. This is genius.

Holden Caulfield’s Goddam War

2011-01-30T13:07:00.001-05:00

Holden Caulfield’s Goddam War - Culture

In the autumn of 1950, at his home in Westport, Connecticut, J. D. Salinger completed The Catcher in the Rye. The achievement was a catharsis. It was confession, purging, prayer, and enlightenment, in a voice so distinct that it would alter American culture.

Holden Caulfield, and the pages that held him, had been the author’s constant companion for most of his adult life. Those pages, the first of them written in his mid-20s, just before he shipped off to Europe as an army sergeant, were so precious to Salinger that he carried them on his person throughout the Second World War. Pages of The Catcher in the Rye had stormed the beach at Normandy; they had paraded down the streets of Paris, been present at the deaths of countless soldiers in countless places, and been carried through the concentration camps of Nazi Germany. In bits and pieces they had been re-written, put aside, and re-written again, the nature of the story changing as the author himself was changed. Now, in Connecticut, Salinger placed the final line on the final chapter of the book. It is with Salinger’s experience of the Second World War in mind that we should understand Holden Caulfield’s insight at the Central Park carousel, and the parting words of The Catcher in the Rye: “Don’t ever tell anybody anything. If you do, you start missing everybody.” All the dead soldiers.

Fighter and Writer

Tuesday, June 6, 1944, was the turning point of J. D. Salinger’s life. It is difficult to overstate the impact of D-day and the 11 months of combat that followed. The war, its horrors and lessons, would brand itself upon every aspect of Salinger’s personality and reverberate through his work. As a young writer before entering the army, Salinger had had stories published in various magazines, including Collier’s and Story, and he had begun to conjure members of the Caulfield family, including the famous Holden. On D-day he had six unpublished Caulfield stories in his possession, stories that would form the spine of The Catcher in the Rye. The experience of war gave his writing a depth and maturity it had lacked; the legacy of that experience is present even in work that is not about war at all. In later life, Salinger frequently mentioned Normandy, but he never spoke of the details—“as if,” his daughter later recalled, “I understood the implications, the unspoken.”

As part of the 4th Counter Intelligence Corps (C.I.C.) detachment, Salinger was to land on Utah Beach with the first wave, at 6:30 A.M., but an eyewitness report has him in fact landing during the second wave, about 10 minutes later. The timing was fortunate. The Channel’s currents had thrown the landing off 2,000 yards to the south, allowing Salinger to avoid the most heavily concentrated German defenses. Within an hour of landing, Salinger was moving inland and heading west, where he and his detachment would eventually connect with the 12th Infantry Regiment.

The 12th had not been so lucky. Although it landed five hours later, it had encountered obstacles that Salinger and his group had not. Just beyond the beach, the Germans had flooded a vast marshland, up to two miles wide, and had concentrated their firepower on the only open causeway. The 12th had been forced to abandon the causeway and wade through waist-high water while under constant threat from enemy guns. It took the 12th Infantry three hours to cross the marsh. After meeting up with the regiment, Salinger would spend the next 26 days in combat. On June 6, the regiment had consisted of 3,080 men. By July 1, the number was down to 1,130.

Unlike many soldiers who had been impatient for the invasion, Salinger was far from naïve about war. In short stories he had already written while in the army, such as “Soft-Boiled Sergeant” and “Last Day of the Last Furlough,” he expressed disgust with the false idealism applied to combat, and attempted to explain that war was a bloody, inglorious affair. But no amount of theoretical insight could have prepared him for what was to come. Salinger would count among his most treasured belongings a small casket containing his five battle stars and the Presidential Unit Citation for valor.

Salinger fought, but he also wrote—wrote constantly, from war’s start to war’s finish. He had begun to write seriously in 1939, as a student at Columbia, under the guidance of a professor, Whit Burnett, who also happened to be the editor of Story magazine, and who became for Salinger a mentor and near father figure. By 1941, Salinger was producing stories in rapid succession, each an experiment to find his own writing style. “Slight Rebellion off Madison,” written that year, is the story where Holden Caulfield makes his debut—Salinger described it as “a sad little comedy about a prep school boy on Christmas vacation.” It was spiritually autobiographical, he admitted. Holden is the first character in whom Salinger embedded himself, and their lives would be joined: whatever happened to Salinger would, in a sense, also happen to Holden. Whit Burnett pushed Salinger repeatedly to place Holden Caulfield into a novel, and he kept prodding him even after he was drafted, in 1942.

Burnett had reason to be nervous. Salinger was a short-story writer who was unaccustomed to longer work. To overcome his possible difficulties with length, Salinger chose to construct the novel by writing it in segments—as a series of short stories that might eventually be strung together. By March 1944, he had completed six stories in this manner, most of them somehow featuring Holden Caulfield and other members of the family. There would be nine such stories altogether. Among the Holden stories from this time was one called “I’m Crazy,” which eventually was incorporated wholesale into The Catcher in the Rye, becoming the chapters in which Holden visits Mr. Spencer and leaves Pencey Prep.

Salinger wrote much that has not survived—there are tantalizing references in his letters—and he also produced much work that never appeared in print. A week after D-day, he sent a three-sentence postcard to Whit Burnett saying that he was O.K., but also explaining that, under the circumstances, he was “too busy to go on with the book right now.” The truth, however, is that Salinger never stopped writing. Of all the Salinger stories to remain unpublished, perhaps none is finer than “The Magic Foxhole,” the first story he wrote while actually fighting on the front line, and the only work in which he ever depicted active combat. “The Magic Foxhole” is angry, verging on the subversive.

The story opens days after D-day on a slow-moving convoy. It casts the reader as an anonymous hitchhiking G.I. picked up by the narrator, a soldier named Garrity. Addressing the G.I. only as “Mac,” Garrity recounts the events of a battle fought by his battalion right after the invasion. His tale focuses on the company point man, Lewis Gardner, and the experiences that cause him to lose his mind. The most powerful portion of “The Magic Foxhole” is the opening scene, which describes the landings at Normandy. Among the dead bodies on the beach is a solitary living figure—a chaplain crawling around in the sand, frantically searching for his glasses. The narrator, as his transport nears the beach, watches the surreal scene in amazement, until the chaplain, too, is killed. It was no accident that Salinger chose a chaplain to be the only living man among the dead in the heat of war. It was also no accident that the chaplain should be desperate for the clarity his glasses would provide. A man who believed he held the answer to life’s great questions suddenly discovers that he doesn’t—just when he needs an answer most. It is a critical moment in Salinger’s writing. For the first time, he asks the question: Where is God?

A Nightmare World

On August 25, 1944, the Germans surrendered Paris. The 12th Regiment was ordered to flush out resistance from one quadrant of the city. As an intelligence officer, Salinger was also designated to identify Nazi collaborators among the French. According to John Keenan, his C.I.C. partner and best friend throughout the war, they had captured such a collaborator when a nearby crowd caught wind of the arrest and descended on them. After wresting the prisoner away from Salinger and Keenan, who were unwilling to shoot into the throng, the crowd beat the man to death. Salinger and Keenan could do nothing but watch.

Salinger was in Paris for only a few days, but they were the happiest days he would experience during the war. His recollection of them is contained in a letter to Whit Burnett. The high point was a meeting with Ernest Hemingway, who was a war correspondent for Collier’s. There was no question in Salinger’s mind where Hemingway would be found. He jumped into his jeep and made for the Ritz. Hemingway greeted Salinger like an old friend. He claimed to be familiar with his writing, and asked if he had any new stories on him. Salinger managed to locate a copy of The Saturday Evening Post containing “Last Day of the Last Furlough,” which had been published that summer. Hemingway read it and was impressed. The two men talked shop over drinks.

Salinger was relieved to find that Hemingway was not at all pretentious or overly macho, as he had feared he might be. Rather, he found him to be gentle and well grounded: overall, a “really good guy.” Salinger tended to separate Hemingway’s professional persona from his personal one. He told one friend that Hemingway was essentially kind by nature but had been posturing for so many years that it now came naturally to him. Salinger disagreed with the underlying philosophy of Hemingway’s work. He said that he hated Hemingway’s “overestimation of sheer physical courage, commonly called ‘guts,’ as a virtue. Probably because I’m short on it myself.”

As time went on, Salinger derived great personal strength from his relationship with Hemingway, and knew him by his nickname, “Papa.” The warmth did not necessarily transfer to Hemingway’s writing—at least not if one goes by Holden Caulfield’s later condemnation of A Farewell to Arms. But during the war, Salinger was grateful for Hemingway’s friendship.

The Allied invasion of Normandy, June 6, 1944. J. D. Salinger was part of the second wave attacking Utah Beach. By Robert F. Sargent/Bettmann/Corbis; digital colorization by Lorna Clark.

After the liberation of Paris, General Dwight D. Eisenhower’s chief of staff declared that “militarily, the war is over.” Salinger’s division would have the honor of being the first to enter Germany. Once it had crossed into the Third Reich and breached the Siegfried line, its orders were to sweep away any resistance from the area of the Hürtgen Forest and take up a position to protect the flank of the First Army.

When Salinger entered Hürtgen, he crossed into a nightmare world. The forest was more heavily fortified than anyone had guessed. The Germans employed tree bursts, which exploded well above the soldiers’ heads, resulting in a shower of shrapnel and shredded tree limbs. Then there was the weather—either drenching wet or burning cold. Nearly half of the 2,517 casualties suffered by the 12th Infantry in Hürtgen were due to the elements. Hürtgen is viewed by historians as among the greatest Allied debacles of the war.

Salinger did manage to find one moment of solace. During the battle for the forest, Hemingway was briefly stationed as a correspondent with the 22nd Regiment, just a mile from Salinger’s encampment. One night, during a lull in the fighting, Salinger turned to a fellow soldier, Werner Kleeman, a translator he had befriended while training in England. “Let’s go,” Salinger urged. “Let’s go see Hemingway.” The two men made their way through the forest to Hemingway’s quarters, a small cabin lit by the extraordinary luxury of its own generator. The visit lasted two or three hours. They drank celebratory champagne from aluminum canteen cups.

Salinger’s choice of companion was perhaps an expression of gratitude. Among his commanders in the Hürtgen Forest was an officer whom Kleeman later described as having been “a heavy drinker” and cruel to his troops. The officer had once ordered Salinger to remain in a frozen foxhole overnight, despite knowing that he was without proper supplies. Kleeman secretly delivered two items from Salinger’s belongings that helped him survive: a blanket and a pair of his mother’s ubiquitous woolen socks.

Hürtgen changed everyone who experienced it. Most survivors never spoke of Hürtgen again. The sufferings that Salinger endured are essential to understanding his later work. They gave rise, for instance, to the nightmares suffered by Sergeant X in “For Esmé—with Love and Squalor.”

Ghostly Encounter

From Hürtgen, Salinger sent a letter to his friend Elizabeth Murray, saying that he had been writing as much as possible. He claimed to have completed five stories since January and to be in the process of finishing another three. Years later, Salinger’s counter-intelligence colleagues would remember him as constantly stealing away to write. One recalled a time when the unit came under heavy fire. Everyone began ducking for cover. Glancing over, the soldiers caught sight of Salinger typing away under a table.

The pain of loss dominates Salinger’s seventh Caulfield story, “This Sandwich Has No Mayonnaise,” which was probably written around this very time. As the story opens, Sergeant Vincent Caulfield is at boot camp in Georgia, sitting aboard a truck along with 33 other G.I.’s. It is late evening, and despite a downpour the men are bound for a dance in town. But there is a problem. Only 30 men are allowed to go to the dance, and the group aboard the truck therefore contains 4 too many. The truck is delayed while the men wait for a lieutenant to arrive and resolve the issue. As they wait, the conversation among the men reveals that Vincent Caulfield is in charge of the group and therefore responsible for deciding whom to exclude. In a stream-of-consciousness exploration of loneliness and nostalgia, the narrative concentrates less on what is happening in the truck than on what is going on in Vincent’s mind: Vincent’s younger brother Holden has been reported missing in action in the Pacific, and is presumed dead.

While the men on the truck talk about home, where they come from, and what they did before the war, Vincent experiences a series of flashbacks. He sees himself at the 1939 World’s Fair with his sister Phoebe as they visit the Bell Telephone exhibition. When they come out, they find Holden standing there. Holden asks Phoebe for her autograph, and Phoebe playfully punches him in the stomach, “happy to see him, happy he was her brother.” Vincent’s mind keeps leaping back to Holden. He sees him at prep school, on the tennis court, and sitting on the porch at Cape Cod. How can Holden possibly be missing?

When the lieutenant arrives, he is visibly annoyed. When he asks about the situation, Vincent feigns ignorance and pretends to count heads. He offers a movie to anyone willing to forgo the dance. Two soldiers skulk off into the night, but Vincent still has two men too many. Finally he makes a decision and orders the last two men on the left to leave the truck. One soldier dismounts and slips away. Vincent waits and finally sees another soldier emerge. As the figure comes into the light, the image of a young boy is revealed. All eyes are fixed upon him as he stands in the downpour. “I was on the list,” the boy says, almost in tears. Vincent does not respond. In the end it is the lieutenant who orders the boy back into the truck and arranges for an extra girl at the party to match the extra man.

The boy’s appearance is the climax of the story. A figure emerging from the darkness, he is vulnerable and distressed. He is the spirit of Holden. Vincent reaches out and turns up the boy’s collar to protect him from the rain. As the story concludes, Vincent pleads to his missing brother: “Just go up to somebody—and tell them you’re Here—not Missing, not dead, not anything but Here.”

Battle Fatigue

His intelligence duties brought Salinger face-to-face with the Holocaust. The Counter Intelligence Corps had compiled and disseminated a confidential report to its agents titled “The German Concentration Camps.” C.I.C. officers were instructed that upon entering an area suspected of containing one of these camps it was their duty to make straightaway for its location.

On April 22, after a difficult fight for the town of Rothenberg, the path of Salinger’s division brought it into a triangular region approximately 20 miles on each side, situated between the Bavarian cities of Augsburg, Landsberg, and Dachau. This territory held the vast Dachau concentration-camp system. As the 12th Regiment swarmed into the area, it came upon the camps. “You could live a lifetime,” he once told his daughter, “and never really get the smell of burning flesh out of your nose.”

Salinger’s wartime experiences eventually brought on a deep depression. When the German Army surrendered, on May 8, 1945, the world erupted in celebration. Salinger spent the day alone, sitting on his bed, staring at a .45-caliber pistol clutched in his hands. What would it feel like, he wondered, if he were to fire the gun through his left palm? Salinger recognized the potential danger of his state of mind. In July, he checked himself into a hospital in Nuremberg for treatment.

Most of what we know about Salinger’s hospitalization is derived from a July 27 letter he wrote to Hemingway from the hospital. It began by openly confessing that Salinger had been “in an almost constant state of despondency” and wanted to talk to someone professional before it got out of hand. During his stay, the staff had peppered him with questions: What was his childhood like? How was his sex life? Did he like the army? Salinger had given a sarcastic answer to each question—except for the one about the army. That last question he had answered with an unambiguous “yes.” He very much had the future Holden Caulfield novel in mind when he gave this answer, explaining to Hemingway that he was afraid of the impact a psychological discharge might have on how the book’s author would be perceived.

Some of the irony and vernacular of Holden Caulfield comes through in this letter. “There are very few arrests left to be made in our section,” he writes. “We’re now picking up children under ten if their attitudes are snotty.” Also apparent is Salinger’s need for affirmation. At times, his tone is pleading. Will Hemingway please write to him? Can Hemingway possibly find the time to visit him later, in New York? Is there anything Salinger can do for him? “The talks I had with you here,” he told Hemingway, “were the only hopeful minutes of the whole business.”

When Salinger returned home from the war, he resumed his life as a writer of short stories, many of which appeared in The New Yorker. But he never lost sight of Holden Caulfield. What Salinger had of the novel was a tangle of stories written as far back as 1941. The challenge was to weave the strands together into a unified work of art. He took up the task early in 1949.

The war changed Holden. He had first appeared in the pre-war story “Slight Rebellion off Madison,” which would be absorbed into Catcher. But the passage of time and events completely transformed the episode—Salinger’s own experiences melted into the retelling. In “Slight Rebellion,” Holden is pointedly selfish and confused; he is presented in a third-person voice, far removed from the reader. The same scene in The Catcher in the Rye conveys an impression of nobility. Holden’s words are largely the same, but in the novel his selfishness has evaporated and he seems to be speaking a larger truth. The third-person voice is gone—the reader has direct access to Holden’s thoughts and words.

When Salinger finished The Catcher in the Rye, he sent the manuscript to Robert Giroux, at Harcourt, Brace. When Giroux received the manuscript, he “thought it a remarkable book and considered [himself] lucky to be its editor.” He was convinced that the novel would do well but later confessed that “the thought of a best-seller never crossed my mind.” Assured of the novel’s distinction and having already sealed the deal with a handshake, Giroux sent The Catcher in the Rye to Harcourt, Brace vice president Eugene Reynal. After Reynal reviewed the manuscript, it became clear to Giroux that the publishing house would not recognize the oral contract. Worse still, it was apparent that Reynal did not understand the novel at all. As Giroux later recalled, “I didn’t realize what big trouble I was in until, after he’d read it, he said, ‘Is Holden Caulfield supposed to be crazy?’ He also told me he’d given the typescript to one of our textbook editors to read. I said ‘Textbook, what has that to do with it?’ ‘It’s about a preppie, isn’t it?’ The textbook editor’s report was negative, and that settled that.”

“Those bastards,” Salinger said after getting the news. The manuscript was sent to Little, Brown, in Boston, which snatched it up immediately.

Salinger would endure one further blow. At the end of 1950, his agent delivered The Catcher in the Rye to the offices of The New Yorker, a gift from Salinger to the magazine that had stood by him for so long. He intended for The New Yorker to publish excerpts from the book. The New Yorker’s reaction was conveyed by Gus Lobrano, the fiction editor with whom he had worked closely for many years. According to Lobrano, the Catcher manuscript had been reviewed by himself and at least one other editor. Neither of them liked it. Its characters were considered to be unbelievable and the Caulfield children, in particular, too precocious. In their opinion, “The notion that in one family there are four such extraordinary children … is not quite tenable.” The New Yorker declined to print a single word of the book.

The Catcher in the Rye was published on July 16, 1951. The public impact was greater than Salinger could have hoped for—or perhaps could deal with. Time magazine praised the novel’s depth and compared the author to Ring Lardner. The New York Times called Catcher “unusually brilliant.” Despite its initial reservations, The New Yorker found it “brilliant, funny,” and “meaningful.” The less favorable reviews generally found fault with the novel’s language and idiom. (A number of critics were offended by Holden’s repeated use of “goddam” and especially the phrase “fuck you”—shocking for any novel in 1951.) Catcher soon emerged onto the New York Times best-seller list and would remain there for seven months.

What readers encountered within the covers of The Catcher in the Rye was often life-changing. From the novel’s opening line, Salinger draws the reader into the peculiar, unrestrained reality of Holden Caulfield, whose meandering thoughts, emotions, and memories populate the most completely stream-of-consciousness experience yet offered by American literature.

For Salinger himself, writing The Catcher in the Rye was an act of liberation. The bruising of Salinger’s faith by the terrible events of war is reflected in Holden’s loss of faith, caused by the death of his brother Allie. The memory of fallen friends haunted Salinger for years, just as Holden was haunted by the ghost of his brother. The struggle of Holden Caulfield echoes the spiritual journey of the author. In both author and character, the tragedy is the same: a shattered innocence. Holden’s reaction is shown through his scorn of adult phoniness and compromise. Salinger’s reaction was personal despondency, through which his eyes were opened to the darker forces of human nature.

Both eventually came to terms with the burdens they carried, and their epiphanies were the same. Holden comes to realize he can enter adulthood without becoming false and sacrificing his values; Salinger came to accept that knowledge of evil did not ensure damnation. The experience of war gave a voice to Salinger, and therefore to Holden Caulfield. He is no longer speaking only for himself—he is reaching out to all of us.

Where Does the South Begin?

2011-01-29T13:09:00.001-05:00

via theatlantic.com

Taco Bell

2011-01-24T23:55:00.001-05:00

According to some recent reports, their taco meat is only 36% meat. So there are calls for Taco Bell to label their tacos as full of "meat filling". However, the Department of Agriculture defines a meat filling as having more than 40% meat content.
So there's no legal definition for what goes into Taco Bell's tacos. I hope they get the pants sued off of them.
But a more fitting punishment would be if they were forced to actually eat full portions of Taco Bell.

I'm now very happy that I've never eaten there. Now I never will.

The oldest websites on the internet

2011-01-24T21:27:00.001-05:00

via asylum.co.uk

He's Crazy

2011-01-22T10:18:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

Wow

2011-01-20T23:01:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

...I should be doing homework

LBJ Buys Pants

2011-01-19T18:10:00.001-05:00

via vimeo.com

Even the president has ill-fitting clothes.

And this guy loves windows.

2011-01-18T22:10:00.001-05:00

I’ve complained again and again about Microsoft’s inability to ship software updates for Windows Phone, noting that the sheer number of missing features and bugs requires a steady stream of hot-fixes. They’re not listening, and are instead embarking on an agonizingly slow update cycle that involves monolithic releases (where each release builds off the previous release) on a slow, slow, slow schedule.

This is exactly how they shouldn’t be doing it.

But then Microsoft isn’t the only company with a modern smart phone. Three and a half years years ago, Apple released its first iPhone, and while I instantly grasped the importance of this device, I also recognized at the time that it was a work in progress, especially for Windows users. And so I wrote a number of articles (like this one) in which I complained about missing features and bugs (sound familiar), all back in 2007-2008.

But I did something else as well. As Apple released updates for the iPhone throughout this time period, I documented the updates and changes. And you can look back on this document now and compare and contrast what Microsoft has done with Windows Phone in a similar time period.

Let’s see how they compare, using similar time frames as a comparison.

Microsoft, October 2010 – January 2011 (three months)

Software updates, improvements, bug fixes: 0

This one is easy. Microsoft has done nothing.

Apple, July 2007 – October 2007 (three months)

Software updates, improvements, bug fixes: Many, including:

iPhone 1.01, August 2007 – Bug fixes and security fixes, including stability fixes.

iPhone 1.02, August 2007 – More bug and security fixes.

Major new updates announced, September 2007 – Apple transparently revealed early in the month that coming iPhone updates would add ringtone support, iTunes Wi-Fi support, and Starbucks service support. Apple also announced sweeping price cuts.

Ringtone editing and purchasing, September 2007 – Apple delivered on its ringtone promise just 6 days later.

iPhone 1.1.1, September 2007 – Added the promised iTunes Wi-Fi Music Store, data roaming, double-tap support for the Home button, and much more.

IMAP support for Gmail (added by Google, not Apple), October 2007.

Of course, it didn’t stop there. Apple delivered iPhone 1.1.2 in November 2007, and iPhone 1.1.3 in January 2008. The sheer pace of improvement and innovation there is stunning in retrospect. And it makes what Microsoft has done in a similar time frame—i.e. absolutely nothing—look even sillier by comparison.

To summarize, the Microsoft of 2011 doesn’t compete effectively with the Apple of 2007. How, exactly, are they going to compete with today’s Apple?

It’s a pretty relevant question, I think.

via windowsphonesecrets.com

Paul Thurrott, on software updates: Windows Phone 7 vs. iPhone