<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nwp</title>
	<atom:link href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Molecules of the world, FLOW!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2014 03:34:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">330772</site><cloud domain='naxos.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Nwp" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='https://naxos.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
	<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deleuze FB Group</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-5/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Wayne and Robbert: it is very naive to think that Badiou, Hallward or Zizek are critics of Deleuze, they are rather Deleuze detractors (there is a big difference between one and the other). I think that what Pierre is bringing here is not much of a critique but the ideological consequences of &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/12/02/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-5/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deleuze FB&#160;Group</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3321</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deleuze FB Group</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-4/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the problem here is the way we are up to understand what is the value involved in the act of reading and what this value is for. On the one hand: yes, certainly, we can read all kind of things so as to know what is all about them. But this is most &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-4/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deleuze FB&#160;Group</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3319</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deleuze FB Group</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-3/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 19:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On my part, what it is needed to be said is that for Deleuze (just as Deleuze understands it, and just as Deleuze invites us to infer and understand): Conatus is active and not reactive. As I see it, Mr. Keith in-sists to put it as reactive on his own self-absorbed right, but while doing &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/11/01/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-3/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deleuze FB&#160;Group</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3317</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deleuze FB Group</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 02:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How curious, I thought it was rather me who was not willing to argue with Keith, who seems to react against what I have commented, however, I never suggested that for Deleuze’s understanding of Spinoza’s essence is not regarded to interiority, as Keith seems to understand: what I have said is that this interiority is &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deleuze FB&#160;Group</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3313</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deleuze FB Group</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 23:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Conatus is an active encounter or collision of the forces of attraction/ repulsion which constitute the outside , and if the body is violently ‘immersed’ in conatus it is because its intensive and extensive parts are always exposed to such an outside, so, as its composites, they are all the way continuously forged by it, &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/conversation-in-deleuze-fb-group/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deleuze FB&#160;Group</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3311</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Quora</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/conversation-in-quora-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/conversation-in-quora-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 22:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not at all. It is like many have said here: it is love what leads to knowledge, and this applies to everything. It is love the very matter with which one is able to get to know things: how to comprehend anything without one openning to it, without an unselfish movement, without an opened heart? &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/conversation-in-quora-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Quora</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/29/conversation-in-quora-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3120</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation In Quora</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/conversation-in-quora/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I honestly do not think that one can experience ego death as such, say, as a full and absolute empirical blown of the ego, without any psychedelic substances. But the use of these substances does not guarantee such experience either. The full and absolute blown of the ego that means its death is the experience &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/conversation-in-quora/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation In Quora</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3209</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in The Tragic Community</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes I think we agree. Nietzsche is a magmatic reference in AO which revitalizes Marx but also that gives Nietzscheanism a broader perspective to consider. I think that what is underneath such perspective is still an unformed sort of Nietzschean communism -which needs further development so as to be uncovered-. I personally see that becoming &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in The Tragic&#160;Community</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3139</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in The Tragic Community</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 10:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is interesting. I myself wrote something very alike in this direction, however I still find that the way Deleuze and Guattari invoke Nietzsche is regarded to the acceleration of the process but with respect to the deterritorialized flow of the schizo, not of the deterritorialized flow of capital. This leads to all kind of &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in The Tragic&#160;Community</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/30/conversation-in-the-tragic-community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3138</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in AGENT SWARM</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/conversation-in-agent-swarm-5/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/conversation-in-agent-swarm-5/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2014 06:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Putting aside the postscript, I celebrate everything you say in the main commentary, which I find very schizosophical. I also appreciate a lot your thoughts on dreams, verticality and horizontality, they are very enriching and of course I felt alluded with regards to my recent post 😉 Comentado por Naxos en: THERE IS MADNESS IN &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/conversation-in-agent-swarm-5/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in AGENT&#160;SWARM</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/conversation-in-agent-swarm-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3130</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Department of IRL Studies</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-department-of-irl-studies/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-department-of-irl-studies/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Schizoanalysis is a radical conceptual reformulation of anti-psychiatry: it posits the question of a schizo anti-psychiatric practice and its program is the production and induction of intensities. This is hard to grasp for conventional people (which I am not, personally) because there is necessarily an epistemological rupture implied precisely in order to avoid to staying &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-department-of-irl-studies/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Department of IRL&#160;Studies</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-department-of-irl-studies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3136</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in AGENT SWARM</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-agent-swarm-4/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-agent-swarm-4/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The trick is to not create expectations with regards to whether your posts will be commented or not, otherwise one ends up generating an affective debt for oneself, while good comments today are few and rare. In the same sense, when someone makes a comment that space in your blog gets filled, and this is &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-agent-swarm-4/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in AGENT&#160;SWARM</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/10/conversation-in-agent-swarm-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3128</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Speculative Humbug</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dave, please see that a scholastic view is always narrow: it is meant to be something that gives a specific sense to the practice of an endogenous group inside a specific field of knowledge, so it is a view which is always with regards to the specific doxa constituted by the ways with which those &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Speculative&#160;Humbug</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3134</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Speculative Humbug</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 11:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hopefully Deleuze scholars will finally take the bull by the horns and confront their narrowed scholastic view of Deleuze with the post-Deleuze that Deleuze actually came to be as part of schizoanalytic project. I personally have my doubts, because the point of such a project is not quite oriented to a ‘scholarly understanding’ of D&#38;G’s &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Speculative&#160;Humbug</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/09/02/conversation-in-speculative-humbug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3132</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in AGENT SWARM</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/conversation-in-agent-swarm-3/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/conversation-in-agent-swarm-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my experience I cannot but see that scholars and academics are of the same type: while they are not the same as you say, they ‘belong’ to the same type. They can have different degrees of passion, yes, but they are enlisted in the same category of interest, as their passion is anyway stimulated &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/conversation-in-agent-swarm-3/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in AGENT&#160;SWARM</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/conversation-in-agent-swarm-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3126</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Progressive Geographies</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-4/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-4/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3121</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is clear that these letters are an exercise of Deleuzian ventriloquism, we just need to read them between lines and see how they connect with the concerns that Deleuze manifested about Bergson. John Protevi posted this but he did not seem to notice the experimental and sensible nature of the exchange, neither Nathan Widder, &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-4/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Progressive&#160;Geographies</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3121</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Urban Future (2.1)</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/conversation-in-urban-future-2-1/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 14:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that Deleuze and Guattari schizoanalytic activism is not a Nietzscheanized quasi-Marxism. Because this is to say that it had the aim to be a marxism but could not be. This is not quite so: D&#38;G’s schizoanalytic project enhances marxism to the point of an ideological rupture, so it overcomes marxism without dismissing it. &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/03/05/conversation-in-urban-future-2-1/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Urban Future&#160;(2.1)</span></a>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3207</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Progressive Geographies</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/01/06/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-3/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/01/06/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think that if we consider what Chomsky once asserted regards to Foucault –that he had never meet someone so completely amoral like Foucault- i.e, in light of the three moral principles that Foucault mentions and applies to himself, we can extract by defect and as a logical consequence as well, the three principles that &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/01/06/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-3/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Progressive&#160;Geographies</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2014/01/06/conversation-in-progressive-geographies-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3118</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in attempts at living</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-4/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-4/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arran, thanks for your reply, though it s a fruitless response for a Nietzschean with respect to nihilism. You can try to speak in favour of Levi whatever you want, but it is enough for me to see that my point is not moot despite your efforts, something that you cannot but respect (Tim Morton? &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-4/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in attempts at&#160;living</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3114</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in attempts at living</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-3/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arran, thanks for your reply. I respect the fact that you do not seem to understand enough the schizoanalytical mode, what leads me to say that maybe I do understand it better than you. So firtsly I would say that D&#38;G does not privilege the schizo in the sense of saying: &#8216;let us *decide* to &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-3/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in attempts at&#160;living</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3111</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Noir Realism</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-noir-realism-5/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-noir-realism-5/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am somehow delighted with Arran&#8217;s commentaries and his re-emerging Nietzscheanism, which I celebrate as good news in the blogosphere. I just recently commented something about the question concerned to the meaning of life that i want to share here (just to illustrate about what might mean to think life from a post nihilistic condition, &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-noir-realism-5/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Noir&#160;Realism</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-noir-realism-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3108</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in attempts at living</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-2/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3106</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a Deleuzo-Nietzschean, I also prefer to think in terms of an active nihilism (which is better referred to the practice of experimenting life and the intensities it carves against any encysted negativity) rather than in terms of a post-nihilism (which still does not overcome the mourning of what the world could be, of what &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in attempts at&#160;living</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3106</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in attempts at living</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 23:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The quote is neat: there is nothing strange about it, but I agree with dmfant that there is a need to specify which sort or experience or state may be the model to think our modern/western condition. To my mind, this theme has already a schizoanalytical firm: as i see it, this specificity can be &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in attempts at&#160;living</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/conversation-in-attempts-at-living/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3104</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation at An Emphatic Umph</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-at-an-emphatic-umph/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-at-an-emphatic-umph/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Interesting and nice to read. I am kind of ambivalent about this issue: I consider myself a self-forged philosopher, and as such i have given myself all the freedom to think whatever i might be up to think about philosophy, but this does not exclude some rigour in my thinking, in my writing and in &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-at-an-emphatic-umph/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation at An Emphatic&#160;Umph</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-at-an-emphatic-umph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3102</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deterritorial Investigations</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 02:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey I just noticed that you are the one who writes this blog, cool, I was wondering what happened to your edmundberger.wp.com! Thanks for your reply, I think we agree with the main idea. But I admit that I am always watching myself out from splicing some of D&#38;G’s terms together with other non schizoanalytical &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deterritorial&#160;Investigations</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3099</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Deterritorial Investigations</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 00:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Another great post, Thanks. However, I would not say with Baudrillard that the Oedipus complex is molecular even if we understand it as a process. On the contraire: it is a bodily molar investment, a sedimentation/segregation/secretion brought by symbolic order and by its structures: it may be everywhere as symbolic as it is, and it &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Deterritorial&#160;Investigations</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/05/08/conversation-in-deterritorial-investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3097</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in plastic bodies</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/conversation-in-plastic-bodies/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/conversation-in-plastic-bodies/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congratulations for the publication. I am kind of intrigued about how it is considered Bourdieu&#8217;s concept habitus in relation with the notion of habit. In Bourdieu, habitus is not quite referred as habit, it is much more dynamic and systematic with respect to Bourdieu&#8217;s main conceptualization of the field, and this to the point that &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/conversation-in-plastic-bodies/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in plastic&#160;bodies</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/30/conversation-in-plastic-bodies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3095</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in AGENT SWARM</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-agent-swarm-2/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-agent-swarm-2/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3093</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Harman&#8217;s &#8216;frankness&#8217; is just idiotic ontologized self-cheating, there is no need to be elegant to say it. You forgot to mention his reaction on Jussi Parikka&#8217;s post, which was also pretty symptomatic about his schismogenetical manners. My salutes to you, Terence 🙂 Comentado por Naxos en: HOW WE BECAME POST-VICARIOUS: Why Graham Harman can never &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-agent-swarm-2/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in AGENT&#160;SWARM</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-agent-swarm-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3093</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in Maverick Philosopher</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-maverick-philosopher/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-maverick-philosopher/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 13:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That what we ask when we are asking about the meaning of life is in fact that life&#8217;s matter, the matter of life which is life itself, is meaningless. Life itself has no existential meaning. This lack of meaning is the line from which to departure any philosophical thinking of life itself and its absoluteness. &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-maverick-philosopher/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in Maverick&#160;Philosopher</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/conversation-in-maverick-philosopher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3091</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conversation in An und für sich</title>
		<link>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/conversation-in-an-und-fur-sich-3/</link>
					<comments>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/conversation-in-an-und-fur-sich-3/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[. . : : Naxos : : . .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 13:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Convo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://naxos.wordpress.com/?p=3089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some days ago I had a conversation with Dorothea Olkowski (via Facebook) saying precisely that the so called new materialism is just a form of objectivism (Delanda, as the most prominent), and that Deleuze’s opened the path to understand life itself as the very flow of non-organized life that it materially is: an understanding that &#8230; <a href="https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/conversation-in-an-und-fur-sich-3/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Conversation in An und für&#160;sich</span></a>]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://naxos.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/conversation-in-an-und-fur-sich-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3089</post-id>
		<media:content url="https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c751b8cb839e0f792a4187e05328d8be0ac92fe16b901a70e810b6a41ce92fa0?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Naxos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
