<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" gd:etag="W/&quot;AkAHQXsyfSp7ImA9WxJUE00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101</id><updated>2009-07-11T11:38:50.595+01:00</updated><title>Net Bet Blog</title><subtitle type="html">News, views and analysis of online gaming, stock prices and discussion of the current global regulatory framework. PartyGaming, Neteller, 32Red, 888.com, Sportingbet, William Hill, Ladbrokes will be carefully monitored</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>732</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NetBetBlog" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">NetBetBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04ESH86eCp7ImA9WxJUEkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-246713060454281858</id><published>2009-07-10T20:53:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-10T20:58:29.110+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-10T20:58:29.110+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BWIN" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sportingbet" /><title>Are BWIN going to "TOON"</title><summary type="html">Are BWIN about to pull off a very good deal and get involved with buying Newcastle United?  Newcastle are a massive club that are going cheap.  BWIN need a higher UK presence.  They are big in Europe but small in the UK at the moment.  This would certainly help.  Sportingbet have Wolves and other betting companies are involved in premiership sponsorship.This could be a very good move.bwin Named </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/246713060454281858/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=246713060454281858" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/246713060454281858?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/246713060454281858?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/are-bwin-going-to-toon.html" title="Are BWIN going to &quot;TOON&quot;" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcDRns-eCp7ImA9WxJUEk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-5820908642894510239</id><published>2009-07-10T13:44:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-10T13:47:57.550+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-10T13:47:57.550+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Neteller" /><title>Paypal can be used to fund gambling sites</title><summary type="html">This news came as rather a shock.  I am surprised Paypal have gone down this route and it clearly has implications for Neteller and others.When did ebay change its policy?  Why did I not know this before?This could be a major boost for European gaming companies.  32Red online casino accepts PayPal [Casino Portal]Casino, based in Gibraltar has just announced that they will be accepting deposits </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/5820908642894510239/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=5820908642894510239" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5820908642894510239?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5820908642894510239?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/paypal-can-be-used-to-fund-gambling.html" title="Paypal can be used to fund gambling sites" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEcHSXs-fip7ImA9WxJUEUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-9185216605106042612</id><published>2009-07-09T12:55:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-09T13:20:38.556+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-09T13:20:38.556+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Netplay TV plc" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Playtech" /><title>Netplay and playtech in liveplay deal</title><summary type="html">Another good deal for Playtech the picks and shovels gaming company.  A separate placing my Netplay is also good news for them as the shore up their balance sheet.It will be interesting to see how Liveplay takes off but Playtech are well positioned to benefit from any growth (which could be substantial).Both companies are now more attractive to buy although only Netplay's share price has reacted </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/9185216605106042612/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=9185216605106042612" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/9185216605106042612?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/9185216605106042612?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/netplay-and-playtech-in-liveplay-deal.html" title="Netplay and playtech in liveplay deal" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUNQ30yeCp7ImA9WxJUEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-5998119966836942185</id><published>2009-07-08T08:25:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-08T08:31:32.390+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-08T08:31:32.390+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iMEGA" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="UIGEA" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><title>iMEGA still chasing UIGEA all over the US</title><summary type="html">iMEGA are persistent.  With the funds from the gambling industry they are dedicated to ruling UIGEA as unconstitutional.The implications for European quoted companies is still not clear.  US entry remains a distant dream and all this could do is bolster Fulltilt and Pokerstars.There is no doubt that a positive result (due in 30 days at best) would send stocks flying.  It might be worth taking </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/5998119966836942185/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=5998119966836942185" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5998119966836942185?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5998119966836942185?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/imega-still-chasing-uigea-all-over-us.html" title="iMEGA still chasing UIGEA all over the US" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQAQH8zfyp7ImA9WxJUEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-6826309294479039877</id><published>2009-07-07T22:40:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-07T22:49:01.187+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-07T22:49:01.187+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><title>Norway to ban online gaming - here we go again</title><summary type="html">Will governments never learn? Online gaming cannot be stopped only regulated.This time Norway are trying to protect their monopoly.  This is ultimately doomed.Norway appear to be trying the US financial transaction route.  We don't need to go through all the arguments why it will fail but a quick look at the amount of money that Fulltilt and Pokerstars have made should be enough </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/6826309294479039877/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=6826309294479039877" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6826309294479039877?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6826309294479039877?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/norway-to-ban-online-gaming-here-we-go.html" title="Norway to ban online gaming - here we go again" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">2</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkUGRngycCp7ImA9WxJVFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-2956407525677814985</id><published>2009-07-02T11:10:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-02T11:23:47.698+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-02T11:23:47.698+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gaming CV" /><title>Will it be a Betboo hoo for GVC Holdings?</title><summary type="html">GVC yesterday announced their long awaited Latin America venture.  For the princely sum of $4 million plus a 3 year earn out (capped at $30m) GVC have bought Betboo.com based in Brazil.Betboo currently has 3000 active monthly players.  This is not that many in the grand scheme of things. Does this warrant a price tag of $4m?What are they going to do with it to expand numbers?  Entering foreign </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/2956407525677814985/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=2956407525677814985" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2956407525677814985?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2956407525677814985?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/will-it-be-betboo-hoo-for-gvc-holdings.html" title="Will it be a Betboo hoo for GVC Holdings?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkAGQn05fCp7ImA9WxJVFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-1868067282409055626</id><published>2009-07-02T08:38:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-07-02T08:45:23.324+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-02T08:45:23.324+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Pokerstars" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fulltilt" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>Learn poker at the Partygaming academy</title><summary type="html">Partygaming really are listening.  Perhaps someone over at PRTY is even reading this blog because they are finally implementing some very basic ideas that have worked on other sites.To compete with Fulltilt they have to match Fulltilt on the following:1. Liquidity  - not far behind and they do have enough players and tables2. Table structures - Partygaming need to keep the Jackpot, deep stack and</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/1868067282409055626/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=1868067282409055626" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/1868067282409055626?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/1868067282409055626?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/07/learn-poker-at-partygaming-academy.html" title="Learn poker at the Partygaming academy" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkIDQHc-eyp7ImA9WxJVE0k.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-5025156117094526133</id><published>2009-06-30T08:52:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-30T08:56:11.953+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-30T08:56:11.953+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Betfair" /><title>Betfair enters the US racing market</title><summary type="html">The European re-invasion of the US has started with Betfair leading the charge.Now betfair is a real success story - pity it is in private ownership.  I suspect that this is another great move by Betfair.  They rarely make a mistake.This is an extract from a long and well written article.Betfair takes a punt on US horseracing [Times]Betfair, the online betting company, is gambling on an easing of</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/5025156117094526133/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=5025156117094526133" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5025156117094526133?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5025156117094526133?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/betfair-enters-us-racing-market.html" title="Betfair enters the US racing market" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YBRns4cCp7ImA9WxJVEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-3464049606192025926</id><published>2009-06-29T08:50:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T09:45:57.538+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T09:45:57.538+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fulltilt" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>PartyPoker to go "Professional"</title><summary type="html">Sometimes I wonder if company executives actually read this blog.  As part of my research into pokersites I of course had to, at a large personal cost to myself, register and play on a large number of poker sites.Having compared Fulltilt and Partypoker in the past I made the observation on this site that "Professionals and sponsorship" really do matter.But why should they? I can see why Party </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/3464049606192025926/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=3464049606192025926" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3464049606192025926?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3464049606192025926?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/partypoker-to-go-professional.html" title="PartyPoker to go &quot;Professional&quot;" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0ADSHs6cCp7ImA9WxJVEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-4404402756841062849</id><published>2009-06-29T08:47:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T08:49:39.518+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T08:49:39.518+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Other" /><title>Comments back on</title><summary type="html">Thanks to a reader for pointing out that comments were still not active.  After a particularly bad "spam" attack I had to remove this option.  I was not convinced that my readers needed to know about hotels in Vegas 500 times.Comments are again live.  I believe they make a valuable addition to the site and look forward to further insights..</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/4404402756841062849/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=4404402756841062849" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/4404402756841062849?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/4404402756841062849?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/comments-back-on.html" title="Comments back on" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0IASHc7fCp7ImA9WxJVEks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-875488624372833394</id><published>2009-06-29T08:36:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-29T08:45:49.904+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-29T08:45:49.904+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ladbrokes" /><title>Ladbrokes on the slow train to nowhere?</title><summary type="html">This blog keeps a very close eye on sector trends not least because being ahead of the curve is essential for making good investment calls.For sometime now I have ben concerned about the direction that Ladbrokes is taking.  In the past I was very critical of William Hill and they very poor online offering which was badly thought and and poorly executed.  They then pulled off a very good deal with</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/875488624372833394/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=875488624372833394" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/875488624372833394?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/875488624372833394?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/ladbrokes-on-slow-train-to-nowhere.html" title="Ladbrokes on the slow train to nowhere?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08HSHk5eSp7ImA9WxJWFU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-5579908079507220333</id><published>2009-06-20T21:17:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-20T21:30:39.721+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-20T21:30:39.721+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Poker" /><title>Do we need women friendly poker sites?</title><summary type="html">In academic where I spend my real life there is a large literature that examines the differences in behaviour (economic) of men and women.  There are certainly differences.  The odds are that these differences translate to the poker table but why and how?One observation that I have from playing a lot of poker on a lot of sites (for research purposes of course) is that a lot of men have female </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/5579908079507220333/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=5579908079507220333" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5579908079507220333?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/5579908079507220333?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/do-we-need-women-friendly-poker-sites.html" title="Do we need women friendly poker sites?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYCRnkycSp7ImA9WxJWFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-6086666528187841983</id><published>2009-06-20T10:21:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-20T10:29:27.799+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-20T10:29:27.799+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sportingbet" /><title>Sportingbet to finally pay off the DoJ?</title><summary type="html">The only thing that has prevented Sportingbet being snapped up by a larger online gaming company is the fact that it has the DoJ UIEGA sword hanging over it.This has proved a blessing and a curse.  One thing is for sure, as soon as the DoJ settlement has been concluded there will be a new wave of sector consolidation.  There are a number of companies with a for sale sign outside include </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/6086666528187841983/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=6086666528187841983" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6086666528187841983?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6086666528187841983?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/sportingbet-to-finally-pay-off-doj.html" title="Sportingbet to finally pay off the DoJ?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYFQHwyeyp7ImA9WxJWE0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-946541816996058216</id><published>2009-06-18T22:43:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T22:55:11.293+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T22:55:11.293+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gambling" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Advertising" /><title>SEO and online gaming</title><summary type="html">Search engine opitmization (SEO) is very important.  When I was younger this mattered and I put a lot of effort into optimization of other sites just for fun.  Now I can't be bothered sadly otherwise I would be trying to push this blog up from it current page rank of 4 (which is important).Netbetblog was at 5 and 6 at one point. With a bit of work.....maybe one day.This is of interest at it links</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/946541816996058216/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=946541816996058216" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/946541816996058216?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/946541816996058216?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/seo-and-online-gaming.html" title="SEO and online gaming" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEQEQHs7fyp7ImA9WxJWE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-7388698273195995791</id><published>2009-06-18T21:13:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T21:18:21.507+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T21:18:21.507+01:00</app:edited><title>Partygaming putting a squeeze play on 888?</title><summary type="html">Could Partygaming about to pull a classic squeeze play on 888 by stealing Cashcade and Foxybingo from under their noses?This might explain the recent poor performance in 888's share price.  I fear that 888 are not big enough to compete once Party start throwing their paper about.Foxybingo is a strategic asset and a centre pin of 888's Bingo liquidity.  Party should strike and snap up Cashcade.  </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/7388698273195995791/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=7388698273195995791" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/7388698273195995791?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/7388698273195995791?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/partygaming-putting-squeeze-play-on-888.html" title="Partygaming putting a squeeze play on 888?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0EHRXg9fip7ImA9WxJWE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-8254282279779271458</id><published>2009-06-18T20:56:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T21:07:14.666+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T21:07:14.666+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gaming CV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="888" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>Where Italy leads others are sure to follow</title><summary type="html">The recent online gaming news from Italy could not be better for the sector and explains today's good share price recoveries for a number of shares such as GVC and PARTYGAMING.  I will return to 888 later - they may be suffering the classic problem of not quite being big enough.The key is that the Italian government have quickly learnt that gambling regulation can lead to large and important tax </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/8254282279779271458/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=8254282279779271458" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/8254282279779271458?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/8254282279779271458?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/where-italy-leads-others-are-sure-to.html" title="Where Italy leads others are sure to follow" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak4FQXw_eCp7ImA9WxJWEUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-2681525649214846627</id><published>2009-06-16T11:40:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-16T11:41:50.240+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-16T11:41:50.240+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Playtech" /><title>Playtech broker update</title><summary type="html">Useful upgrade for Playtech.  The accounting procedure for the William Hill joint venture has never been entirely clear to me but it appears that Deutsche Bank have worked it out and that it looks good."Deutsche Bank raises Playtech (PTEC.LN) target price to 630p from 610p. Notes the online joint venture with William Hill (WMH.LN) is now launched and trading in line with expectations. "We have </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/2681525649214846627/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=2681525649214846627" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2681525649214846627?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2681525649214846627?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/playtech-broker-update.html" title="Playtech broker update" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUYBSHk-cSp7ImA9WxJWEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-2283395851140707377</id><published>2009-06-15T22:36:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-15T22:59:19.759+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-15T22:59:19.759+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Webis Holdings" /><title>Webis and beinternet pulling in the punters</title><summary type="html">Webis is very small and very cheap.  Almost priced to go bust it is seems to be making a fist of things.This is getting tempting although it is still so small and the market is so competitive.Still a little risky but one to watch.  Betinternet is a nice little site and they are busy sponsoring races - I have seen too many of these companies go under though.More research required.Webis Holdings </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/2283395851140707377/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=2283395851140707377" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2283395851140707377?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/2283395851140707377?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/webis-and-beinternet-pulling-in-punters.html" title="Webis and beinternet pulling in the punters" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEAGRH06eyp7ImA9WxJWE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-6347945282969679092</id><published>2009-06-12T11:29:00.004+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-18T21:25:25.313+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-18T21:25:25.313+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Poker" /><title>Should you teach your children to play poker?</title><summary type="html">An interesting topic and an interesting poker article.  This post in poker news daily is an excellent summary the sentiment of which I agree with entirely (although you can be sure this view will not be held by many mothers out there).The sentiment expressed here is similar to how Economists are trained.  It is rule of logic and mathematics over emotion.  This is why economists get a bad press.  </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/6347945282969679092/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=6347945282969679092" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6347945282969679092?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/6347945282969679092?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/should-you-teach-your-children-to-play.html" title="Should you teach your children to play poker?" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0cMSXczcSp7ImA9WxJXF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-3807152744411864600</id><published>2009-06-12T09:10:00.005+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-12T09:24:48.989+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-12T09:24:48.989+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Gigamedia" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>Everest melting away</title><summary type="html">We are used to good news stories in the sector with results usually surprising on the upside.  However, when there are winners their are usually some losers.Fulltilt and Pokerstars have been very successful in brand marketing.  Partygaming and not exactly catching up but they are managing to just about cling to their coattails.For others, if the management take their eye off the ball a downward </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/3807152744411864600/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=3807152744411864600" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3807152744411864600?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3807152744411864600?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/everest-melting-away.html" title="Everest melting away" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CU8ESHg5eSp7ImA9WxJXF0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-54040491019064620</id><published>2009-06-11T10:43:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-11T10:50:09.621+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-11T10:50:09.621+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="888" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>Financial times talk US poker crackdown</title><summary type="html">Whilst this small quote tells you nothing that a reader of this blog would not already know it is good to see coverage in the esteemed pink sheet.I agree entirely with this quotation.  As a small example I played PartGaming Poker last night and a couple of hours of PKR and steered clear of Fulltilt.  For netbetblog research purposes of course.  I believe my fulltilt backroll is very safe though </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/54040491019064620/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=54040491019064620" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/54040491019064620?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/54040491019064620?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/financial-times-talk-us-poker-crackdown.html" title="Financial times talk US poker crackdown" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEUMSXc-eSp7ImA9WxJXFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-7317932498617602431</id><published>2009-06-10T15:59:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-10T16:04:48.951+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-10T16:04:48.951+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Pokerstars" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Fulltilt" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="888" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PartyGaming" /><title>Confirmed - player accounts seized for Fulltilt and pokerstars</title><summary type="html">I have been banging away about the unfair competitive advantage that Fulltilt and Pokerstars have over 888 and Partygaming for a long time.I have also said that the UIGEA if properly applied could be good for Partygaming IF it wiped out the US competition (which is really next to impossible).There share price reaction today for PARTY and 888 which moved sharply up in afternoon trading shows the </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/7317932498617602431/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=7317932498617602431" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/7317932498617602431?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/7317932498617602431?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/confirmed-player-accounts-seized-for.html" title="Confirmed - player accounts seized for Fulltilt and pokerstars" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkAFQnw4fip7ImA9WxJXFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-1944586200615894620</id><published>2009-06-10T14:29:00.001+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-10T14:31:53.236+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-10T14:31:53.236+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><title>Pokerstars account frozen?  $30m at stake</title><summary type="html">Breaking news - is the US government finally going to get its teeth into Pokerstars?Some $30m has been frozen - who, what, how?This is breaking news.United States Federal Government Freezes $30 Million in Online Poker Funds [pokerdaily]Over $30 million belonging to at least 24,000 online poker players has been frozen by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, according to </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/1944586200615894620/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=1944586200615894620" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/1944586200615894620?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/1944586200615894620?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/pokerstars-account-frozen-30m-at-stake.html" title="Pokerstars account frozen?  $30m at stake" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYCRnY-fip7ImA9WxJXFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-3927987214710700849</id><published>2009-06-10T13:44:00.002+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-10T14:22:47.856+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-10T14:22:47.856+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="IG index" /><title>IG index gains from volatility</title><summary type="html">I need to give more coverage to spread betting especially fiancial spreadbetting.There is a certain irony about spreadbetting on the performance of companies in the gaming sector that I like.IG Index is the spreadbetting daddy and they report good figures building on stockmarket volatility.  This volatility has since subsided and as always these results are backward looking.As an investment I am </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/3927987214710700849/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=3927987214710700849" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3927987214710700849?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/3927987214710700849?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/ig-index-gains-from-volatility.html" title="IG index gains from volatility" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0AHQ3c_fSp7ImA9WxJXFUo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9083380776754450101.post-8672487724076206801</id><published>2009-06-09T20:17:00.003+01:00</published><updated>2009-06-09T20:28:52.945+01:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-06-09T20:28:52.945+01:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Regulations" /><title>Minnesota backs down on "black list"</title><summary type="html">In a further "pro-regulatory" move, Minnesota backed down on their attempt to get certain gaming internet sites banned.This was always going to be futile - why US states persist with these time wasting attempts at turning back the tide is beyond me.They have clearly seen that regulation is the only way forward.  However, in the meantime there will be a great number of battles and accounts </summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/feeds/8672487724076206801/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9083380776754450101&amp;postID=8672487724076206801" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/8672487724076206801?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9083380776754450101/posts/default/8672487724076206801?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.netbetblog.com/2009/06/minnesota-backs-down-on-black-list.html" title="Minnesota backs down on &quot;black list&quot;" /><author><name>Economist</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11930968800381397814" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total></entry></feed>
