<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Supreme Court Watch | PBS NewsHour Podcast | PBS</title><link>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/indepth_coverage/law/supreme_court/</link><description>The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court.</description><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><itunes:summary>The latest news and analysis about key cases and critical arguments before the Supreme Court.</itunes:summary><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright ©2012 MacNeil/Lehrer Productions. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:25:23 EDT</pubDate><lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:25:23 EDT</lastBuildDate><itunes:image href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/images/rss/promo_podcast.jpg" /><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics" />
<itunes:category text="News" />
<itunes:category text="Politics" />
<itunes:category text="Public Radio" />
<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit><itunes:keywords>News, NewsHour, Court, Supreme Court, scotus, Law, Constitution, Arguments, Decisions, Justice, Chief Justice, Politics, Congress, Capitol</itunes:keywords><itunes:owner><itunes:name>PBS NewsHour</itunes:name><itunes:email>onlineda@newshour.org</itunes:email></itunes:owner><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast" /><feedburner:info uri="newshoursupremecourtpodcast" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>In Ariz. Immigration Case, Supreme Court Weighs Limits of Federal, State Powers</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/Gx_W7Nau6OQ/20120425_arizona.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>As the Supreme Court heard arguments on Arizona's contentious immigration law Wednesday, justices appeared skeptical of the Obama administration's claim that the state had overstepped federal law. Gwen Ifill and Marcia Coyle discuss the arguments and the four distinct parts that are being challenged.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/Gx_W7Nau6OQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>As the Supreme Court heard arguments on Arizona's contentious immigration law Wednesday, justices appeared skeptical of the Obama administration's claim that the state had overstepped federal law. Gwen Ifill and Marcia Coyle discuss the arguments and the four distinct parts that are being challenged.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/25/20120425_arizona.mp3" length="3300" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/25/20120425_arizona.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>07:23</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/25/20120425_arizona.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court to Weigh Contentious Arizona Immigration Law</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/BQ1TJNoz00s/20120424_immigration.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:32:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Arizona's contentious immigration law Wednesday, with focus on so-called show-me-your-papers provisions that authorize police to verify the immigration status of anyone suspected of being undocumented and arrest anyone believed to have committed a deportable offense. Tom Bearden reports.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/BQ1TJNoz00s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Arizona's contentious immigration law Wednesday, with focus on so-called show-me-your-papers provisions that authorize police to verify the immigration status of anyone suspected of being undocumented and arrest anyone believed to have committed a deportable offense. Tom Bearden reports.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/24/20120424_immigration.mp3" length="2300" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/24/20120424_immigration.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>09:55</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/24/20120424_immigration.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>SCOTUS v. POTUS: The Role of the Supreme Court, Historically</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/3d-GzZZeTVA/20120404_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 18:38:00 EDT</pubDate><description>President Obama made his feelings known this week on the Supreme Court, "judicial activism" and "those who would overturn" the health reform law. Some say he's gone too far. Jeffrey Brown discusses the historical tug-of-war between the president and the Court with Georgetown Law's Louis Michael Seidman and Randy Barnett.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/3d-GzZZeTVA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>President Obama made his feelings known this week on the Supreme Court, "judicial activism" and "those who would overturn" the health reform law. Some say he's gone too far. Jeffrey Brown discusses the historical tug-of-war between the president and the Court with Georgetown Law's Louis Michael Seidman and Randy Barnett.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/04/20120404_scotus.mp3" length="5800" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/04/20120404_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>12:47</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/04/20120404_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Upholds Inmate Strip Searches Regardless of Charges</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/EiAxEXABUxM/20120402_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 18:48:00 EDT</pubDate><description>In a Supreme Court case that pit jail security needs against personal privacy rights, justices ruled 5-4 against Albert Florence, and said Florence's civil rights were not violated when he was strip searched after being arrested on an out-of-date warrant for an unpaid fine. Margaret Warner and Marcia Coyle discuss the decision.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/EiAxEXABUxM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>In a Supreme Court case that pit jail security needs against personal privacy rights, justices ruled 5-4 against Albert Florence, and said Florence's civil rights were not violated when he was strip searched after being arrested on an out-of-date warrant for an unpaid fine. Margaret Warner and Marcia Coyle discuss the decision.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/02/20120402_scotus.mp3" length="2400" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/02/20120402_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>05:37</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/04/02/20120402_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Shields, Brooks on Supreme Court 'High Tension,' Health Reform's Future</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/LxE0V-kofoY/20120330_shieldsbrooks.mp3</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:28:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks discuss the week's top political news including the Supreme Court's big week of hearings on health care reform, the validity of the law's individual mandate, the dangers of the Court evolving into a "political institution" and the Paul Ryan budget.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/LxE0V-kofoY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Syndicated columnist Mark Shields and New York Times columnist David Brooks discuss the week's top political news including the Supreme Court's big week of hearings on health care reform, the validity of the law's individual mandate, the dangers of the Court evolving into a "political institution" and the Paul Ryan budget.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_shieldsbrooks.mp3" length="5500" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_shieldsbrooks.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>12:12</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_shieldsbrooks.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Health Reform's Fate: How the Supreme Court Will Decide</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/Y0UpjdXJXoA/20120330_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>After three days of hearings on health care reform, Supreme Court justices held a secret preliminary vote Friday to deliberate the Affordable Care Act's future. Their decision is expected in late June. Jeffrey Brown and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the steps ahead as the justices begin their deliberations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/Y0UpjdXJXoA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>After three days of hearings on health care reform, Supreme Court justices held a secret preliminary vote Friday to deliberate the Affordable Care Act's future. Their decision is expected in late June. Jeffrey Brown and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the steps ahead as the justices begin their deliberations.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_scotus.mp3" length="3000" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:39</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/30/20120330_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>After Hearings, GOP Candidates Redouble Health Reform Critiques</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/rJsZNa_9mRE/20120329_healthcare.mp3</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>As the Supreme Court decides how to rule on the health reform law following this week's hearings, Republican candidates Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney touched on the topic Thursday. Judy Woodruff, The Washington Post's Amy Gardner and The Boston Globe's Brian Mooney discuss how health care is being debated on the campaign trail.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/rJsZNa_9mRE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>As the Supreme Court decides how to rule on the health reform law following this week's hearings, Republican candidates Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney touched on the topic Thursday. Judy Woodruff, The Washington Post's Amy Gardner and The Boston Globe's Brian Mooney discuss how health care is being debated on the campaign trail.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/29/20120329_healthcare.mp3" length="5200" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/29/20120329_healthcare.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>11:27</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/29/20120329_healthcare.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Wraps Up Health Reform Law Hearings: What's Next?</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/jLOm9pkUMj4/20120328_scotusday3.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>In the final day of Supreme Court hearings on the Affordable Care Act, justices questioned the constitutionality of requiring states to expand Medicaid coverage to more individuals. Betty Ann Bowser reports, and Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss with Gwen Ifill whether the law could survive without an insurance mandate.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/jLOm9pkUMj4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>In the final day of Supreme Court hearings on the Affordable Care Act, justices questioned the constitutionality of requiring states to expand Medicaid coverage to more individuals. Betty Ann Bowser reports, and Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss with Gwen Ifill whether the law could survive without an insurance mandate.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/28/20120328_scotusday3.mp3" length="6800" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/28/20120328_scotusday3.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>14:59</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/28/20120328_scotusday3.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Is Health Law's Individual Mandate Constitutional? Legal Scholars Debate</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/-x0istzYr6k/20120327_mandate.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:20:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Justices at the Supreme Court Tuesday heard arguments over the health care law and whether requiring citizens to buy health insurance is constitutional. Former Solicitor General Walter Dellinger and Georgetown University's Randy Barnett debate the legality of the health reform law's so-called individual mandate.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/-x0istzYr6k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Justices at the Supreme Court Tuesday heard arguments over the health care law and whether requiring citizens to buy health insurance is constitutional. Former Solicitor General Walter Dellinger and Georgetown University's Randy Barnett debate the legality of the health reform law's so-called individual mandate.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_mandate.mp3" length="4300" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_mandate.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>09:30</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_mandate.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Considers Health Reform Day 2 Recap: Individual Mandate on Trial</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/M1TAvOsabVQ/20120327_scotusday2.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Arguments at the Supreme Court Tuesday dealt with whether Congress had the authority to require citizens to purchase health insurance and whether the government could issue a financial penalty for those who decline. Betty Ann Bowser reports then Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss the crux of the hearings with Gwen Ifill.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/M1TAvOsabVQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Arguments at the Supreme Court Tuesday dealt with whether Congress had the authority to require citizens to purchase health insurance and whether the government could issue a financial penalty for those who decline. Betty Ann Bowser reports then Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss the crux of the hearings with Gwen Ifill.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_scotusday2.mp3" length="6500" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_scotusday2.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>14:15</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/27/20120327_scotusday2.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Considers Health Reform Day 1 Recap: Jurisdiction, Tax Questions</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/cp2eU24PnfI/20120326_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Demonstrators gathered Monday outside the Supreme Court as justices kicked off three days of hearings on the health care reform law. Betty Ann Bowser reports then Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss the day's proceedings and the core issues of the day's arguments with Gwen Ifill.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/cp2eU24PnfI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Demonstrators gathered Monday outside the Supreme Court as justices kicked off three days of hearings on the health care reform law. Betty Ann Bowser reports then Marcia Coyle and Susan Dentzer discuss the day's proceedings and the core issues of the day's arguments with Gwen Ifill.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/26/20120326_scotus.mp3" length="8500" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/26/20120326_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>18:55</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/26/20120326_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>A Viewer's Guide to Supreme Court Arguments on Health Care Law</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/aX_3Tc1d2fQ/20120322_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 18:43:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court is set to hear three days of arguments next week over challenges to the health reform law President Obama signed two years ago. Judy Woodruff, The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and Health Affairs' Susan Dentzer preview the upcoming arguments.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/aX_3Tc1d2fQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court is set to hear three days of arguments next week over challenges to the health reform law President Obama signed two years ago. Judy Woodruff, The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and Health Affairs' Susan Dentzer preview the upcoming arguments.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/22/20120322_scotus.mp3" length="4900" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/22/20120322_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>10:56</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/22/20120322_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Weighs Cheney Confrontation Arrest</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/c9x_zKJOo84/20120321_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:16:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt a blow to the EPA, siding with an Idaho couple in a property-rights dispute. It also heard arguments over whether a Colorado man can sue the Secret Service over a 2006 confrontation with former Vice President Dick Cheney. Jeffrey Brown and Marcia Coyle sift through the justices' busy day.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/c9x_zKJOo84" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court on Wednesday dealt a blow to the EPA, siding with an Idaho couple in a property-rights dispute. It also heard arguments over whether a Colorado man can sue the Secret Service over a 2006 confrontation with former Vice President Dick Cheney. Jeffrey Brown and Marcia Coyle sift through the justices' busy day.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/21/20120321_scotus.mp3" length="3600" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/21/20120321_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>07:55</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/21/20120321_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Weighs Life Without Parole for Juvenile Murder Convicts</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/ATilRckfRl0/20120320_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:12:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether 14-year-olds convicted of murder should be required to spend life in prison without the possibility of parole. Gwen Ifill and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the arguments and the issues under consideration.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/ATilRckfRl0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday on whether 14-year-olds convicted of murder should be required to spend life in prison without the possibility of parole. Gwen Ifill and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the arguments and the issues under consideration.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/20/20120320_scotus.mp3" length="3200" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/20/20120320_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>07:09</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/20/20120320_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are Children Conceived After Father's Death Entitled to Survivor's Benefits?</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/Nj74TKWvqms/20120319_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:31:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether children conceived after the death of their biological father, using his frozen sperm, should be entitled to Social Security benefits. The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle said it's not the first time a court has faced reconciling an old law with new technology.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/Nj74TKWvqms" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday on whether children conceived after the death of their biological father, using his frozen sperm, should be entitled to Social Security benefits. The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle said it's not the first time a court has faced reconciling an old law with new technology.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/19/20120319_scotus.mp3" length="2800" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/19/20120319_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:18</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/03/19/20120319_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Weighs Corporate Liability in Human Rights Cases</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/6Wn9Mt7C58s/20120228_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:39:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday, weighing whether victims of abuses overseas should have the right to use U.S. courts to prove companies should pay for alleged involvement in human rights atrocities. Gwen Ifill and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the potential liability implications for corporations.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/6Wn9Mt7C58s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday, weighing whether victims of abuses overseas should have the right to use U.S. courts to prove companies should pay for alleged involvement in human rights atrocities. Gwen Ifill and The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle discuss the potential liability implications for corporations.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/28/20120228_scotus.mp3" length="2900" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/28/20120228_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:24</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/28/20120228_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Hears Free Speech Case Over Stolen Valor Act</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/cMs4lRk29No/20120222_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 18:36:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Falsely claiming a Congressional Medal of Honor could land you in jail according to the Stolen Valor Act, a federal law making it a crime to lie about a military decoration. Margaret Warner and Marcia Coyle discuss a case involving that law under review by the Supreme Court plus a case involving ownership of Montana riverbeds.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/cMs4lRk29No" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Falsely claiming a Congressional Medal of Honor could land you in jail according to the Stolen Valor Act, a federal law making it a crime to lie about a military decoration. Margaret Warner and Marcia Coyle discuss a case involving that law under review by the Supreme Court plus a case involving ownership of Montana riverbeds.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/22/20120222_scotus.mp3" length="3700" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/22/20120222_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:20</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/02/22/20120222_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Want to Use a GPS-Tracking Device? Get a Warrant, Supreme Court Tells Police</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/LOztF95vzCI/20120123_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:20:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that police violated the Constitution by attaching a GPS-tracking device to a car owned by a Washington, D.C., club owner, eventually leading to a cocaine-trafficking conviction. Jeffrey Brown discusses their reasoning and the implications with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/LOztF95vzCI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that police violated the Constitution by attaching a GPS-tracking device to a car owned by a Washington, D.C., club owner, eventually leading to a cocaine-trafficking conviction. Jeffrey Brown discusses their reasoning and the implications with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/23/20120123_scotus.mp3" length="2900" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/23/20120123_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:30</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/23/20120123_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Electoral Maps 'Huge Setback' for Democrats</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/dh-4Di7a1rM/20120120_texas.mp3</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court rejected the new Texas redistricting map Friday, creating disarray for the upcoming primary election. Ray Suarez discusses the decision's political and legal implications with Richard Hasen of the University of California Irvine School of Law and Shira Toeplitz, a political reporter for Roll Call.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/dh-4Di7a1rM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court rejected the new Texas redistricting map Friday, creating disarray for the upcoming primary election. Ray Suarez discusses the decision's political and legal implications with Richard Hasen of the University of California Irvine School of Law and Shira Toeplitz, a political reporter for Roll Call.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/20/20120120_texas.mp3" length="3700" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/20/20120120_texas.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:17</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/20/20120120_texas.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Upholds 'Ministerial Exception' From Anti-Bias Laws</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/ASuwg2AnHls/20120111_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 18:37:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the Constitution provides ministers an exemption to anti-discrimination laws. Margaret Warner discusses the implications of the court's recognition of a "ministerial exception" with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/ASuwg2AnHls" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Wednesday that the Constitution provides ministers an exemption to anti-discrimination laws. Margaret Warner discusses the implications of the court's recognition of a "ministerial exception" with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/11/20120111_scotus.mp3" length="2600" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/11/20120111_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>05:50</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/11/20120111_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>What Role Should FCC Play in Policing Profanity on the Airwaves?</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/8SFuRF1nto8/20120110_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:21:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case involving freedom of speech on broadcast television and the constitutional debate over federal regulation of indecency. Jeffrey Brown discusses the arguments and the potential effects for the FCC with Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/8SFuRF1nto8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case involving freedom of speech on broadcast television and the constitutional debate over federal regulation of indecency. Jeffrey Brown discusses the arguments and the potential effects for the FCC with Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/10/20120110_scotus.mp3" length="3100" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/10/20120110_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:54</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/10/20120110_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Texas Redistricting, Environmental Rules</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/NDWdZ9PZ0pE/20120109_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:35:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday involving a redistricting dispute in Texas. Jeffrey Brown discusses the case's broad implications for the future political landscape of the state -- and potentially the entire nation -- with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/NDWdZ9PZ0pE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The Supreme Court heard arguments Monday involving a redistricting dispute in Texas. Jeffrey Brown discusses the case's broad implications for the future political landscape of the state -- and potentially the entire nation -- with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/09/20120109_scotus.mp3" length="4100" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/09/20120109_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>09:10</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/09/20120109_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Are Super PACs Living Up to Supreme Court's Intentions?</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/UJo7TIWB4u0/20120105_superpac.mp3</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:23:00 EDT</pubDate><description>In Iowa, Super PACs pumped millions of dollars into last-minute negative television ads. What influence will they have in the rest of the GOP primary season and beyond? Judy Woodruff discusses the myriad of super PACs with the Sunlight Foundation's Bill Allison and CQ Roll Call's Eliza Newlin Carney.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/UJo7TIWB4u0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>In Iowa, Super PACs pumped millions of dollars into last-minute negative television ads. What influence will they have in the rest of the GOP primary season and beyond? Judy Woodruff discusses the myriad of super PACs with the Sunlight Foundation's Bill Allison and CQ Roll Call's Eliza Newlin Carney.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/05/20120105_superpac.mp3" length="3700" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/05/20120105_superpac.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:20</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2012/01/05/20120105_superpac.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Lines up Potentially 'Explosive' Election Year Docket</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/S0vymk7LyHI/20111213_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 18:44:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Supreme Court justices agreed Monday to take up a tough immigration law from Arizona that would, among other things, punish illegal immigrants who apply for work in the state. Gwen Ifill discuses this and other controversial cases with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and author Jeff Shesol.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/S0vymk7LyHI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Supreme Court justices agreed Monday to take up a tough immigration law from Arizona that would, among other things, punish illegal immigrants who apply for work in the state. Gwen Ifill discuses this and other controversial cases with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and author Jeff Shesol.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/13/20111213_scotus.mp3" length="3900" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/13/20111213_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:41</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/13/20111213_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Hears Dispute Over Ownership of Montana's Rivers</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/IQ5gHUM7e98/20111207_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:25:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Montana's rivers are pristine and iconic, but they are also at the center of a property rights dispute that wound up before the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Gwen Ifill discusses the details of the dispute with Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/IQ5gHUM7e98" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Montana's rivers are pristine and iconic, but they are also at the center of a property rights dispute that wound up before the Supreme Court on Wednesday. Gwen Ifill discusses the details of the dispute with Marcia Coyle of The National Law Journal.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/07/20111207_scotus.mp3" length="1600" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/07/20111207_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:50</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/12/07/20111207_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Health Reform Law to Face Constitutional Test in Supreme Court</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/vZzBL50RVrY/20111114_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:03:00 EDT</pubDate><description>On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments next spring on the constitutionality of the  health care reform law. Jeffrey Brown discusses the political and legal implications with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and NPR's Julie Rovner.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/vZzBL50RVrY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>On Monday, the Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments next spring on the constitutionality of the  health care reform law. Jeffrey Brown discusses the political and legal implications with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and NPR's Julie Rovner.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/14/20111114_scotus.mp3" length="9000" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/14/20111114_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:05</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/14/20111114_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Hears Landmark GPS Tracking Case</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/jJFA6gahn30/20111108_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 18:32:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Can the government track a suspect using a GPS device without a warrant? That question was at the center of a high-profile case before the Supreme Court on Tuesday. Judy Woodruff discusses the oral arguments in the case with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/jJFA6gahn30" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Can the government track a suspect using a GPS device without a warrant? That question was at the center of a high-profile case before the Supreme Court on Tuesday. Judy Woodruff discusses the oral arguments in the case with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/08/20111108_scotus.mp3" length="6700" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/08/20111108_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:06</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/11/08/20111108_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Weighs Constitutionality of Routine Jailhouse Strip Searches</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/DfT8Yb1ag8c/20111012_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:19:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Do routine jailhouse strip searches for people accused of minor offenses violate the Constitution? Supreme Court justices heard a case Wednesday centering on that issue. Judy Woodruff discusses the case, which pits privacy rights against security concerns, with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/DfT8Yb1ag8c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Do routine jailhouse strip searches for people accused of minor offenses violate the Constitution? Supreme Court justices heard a case Wednesday centering on that issue. Judy Woodruff discusses the case, which pits privacy rights against security concerns, with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/12/20111012_scotus.mp3" length="7800" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/12/20111012_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>07:02</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/12/20111012_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Supreme Court Considers Case on Discrimination in Religious Schools</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/oGxRnknr_FI/20111005_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:16:00 EDT</pubDate><description>Judy Woodruff discusses a Supreme Court case that considers the founding principle of the separation of church and state with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/oGxRnknr_FI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>Judy Woodruff discusses a Supreme Court case that considers the founding principle of the separation of church and state with the National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/05/20111005_scotus.mp3" length="2800" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/05/20111005_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>06:21</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/05/20111005_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Immigration, Affirmative Action on New High Court Docket; Health Reform Awaited</title><itunes:author>PBS NewsHour</itunes:author><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~3/Ae2xIlTTXX4/20111003_scotus.mp3</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 18:18:00 EDT</pubDate><description>The U.S. Supreme Court returned to work Monday and the court has a docket full of controversial cases on topics ranging from obscenity to strip searches to warrantless surveillance. Gwen Ifill previews the new term with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and Scotusblog.com's Tom Goldstein.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NewsHourSupremeCourtPodcast/~4/Ae2xIlTTXX4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><itunes:summary>The U.S. Supreme Court returned to work Monday and the court has a docket full of controversial cases on topics ranging from obscenity to strip searches to warrantless surveillance. Gwen Ifill previews the new term with The National Law Journal's Marcia Coyle and Scotusblog.com's Tom Goldstein.</itunes:summary><enclosure url="http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/03/20111003_scotus.mp3" length="3900" type="audio/mpeg" /><guid isPermaLink="false">http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/03/20111003_scotus.mp3</guid><itunes:duration>08:33</itunes:duration><feedburner:origLink>http://newshour-tc.pbs.org/newshour/rss/media/2011/10/03/20111003_scotus.mp3</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

