<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
    <title>NewsTrust.net - Blog</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-153477</id>
    <updated>2009-11-05T12:57:03-08:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Promoting quality journalism</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Newstrust" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">Newstrust</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
        <title>NewsTrust Member Awards - First Winners</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/11/oct-awards.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/11/oct-awards.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-11-06T20:30:15-08:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a6ac4529970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-05T12:57:03-08:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-05T13:30:24-08:00</updated>
        <summary>Today, we're pleased to announce the first winners of the NewsTrust Member Awards! This new monthly program rewards members of the NewsTrust community who make exceptional contributions to our cause (see our original blog announcement). For the month of October,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Community News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="awards" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="good journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="member awards" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="newstrust" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="opinion" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ratings" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="reviews" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social networks" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news network" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Today, we're pleased to announce the first winners of the <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/awards.html">NewsTrust Member Awards!</a> </p>

<p>This new monthly program rewards members of the NewsTrust community who make exceptional contributions to our cause (see our original <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/awards.html">blog announcement</a>).</p>

<p>For the month of October, we're delighted to feature six outstanding reviewers for their leadership in fulfilling our mission, and for their achievements in a variety of
categories, such as Top Rated or Most Active Reviewer (see below).</p><strong /><p><strong><br />Meet the Winner s</strong><br />
Here are our Member Award winners for October 2009: <strong><br /><br /></strong>• <em>Top Rated Reviewer </em>- <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/chris-finnie">Chris Finnie</a><br /><br />• <em>Most Thorough Reviewer</em> - <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/richard-riehl">Richard Riehl</a><br /><br />• <em>Most Active Reviewer </em>- <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/dwight-rousu">Dwight Rousu</a><br /><br />• <em>Top Rated Post - </em><a href="http://newstrust.net/members/patricia-blochowiak"><em>Patricia</em> Blochowiak</a><br /><br />• <em>Most Reviewed Post</em> - <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/cynthia-gilbert">Cynthia Gilbert</a><br /><br />• <em>Trusted Member of the Month</em> - <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/jo-bobenhouse-smith">Jo Bobenhouse Smith</a><strong><br /><br /></strong>Congratulations to our first round of Member Awards winners! It's a true pleasure to honor your enlightening contributions to our site --
and to the NewsTrust mission. Your participation is an inspiration to
us all. </p><p>Here's a breakdown of each winner's contributions this month -- and how they were selected for their award.<strong><br /><br />Highest Rated Reviewer </strong><br />The October award for Highest Rated Reviewer goes to <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/chris-finnie">Chris Finnie</a>. Chris earned high ratings on her insightful and witty reviews of stories from the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332661/reviews/115347">Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/335994/reviews/115535">New York Times</a>, <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/258082/reviews/112622">MinnPost</a> and others. She has once again shown herself to be one fo the most respected members of our community.<br /><br />The Highest Rated Reviewer award goes to the member whose story reviews
have the highest average rating for the month. The member must have
completed ten or more reviews and received at least ten ratings from
other trusted members.<br /><br /><strong>Most Thorough Reviewer </strong><br /><a href="http://newstrust.net/members/richard-riehl">Richard Riehl</a>
took the time and care to answer as many as 20 questions in many of his
story reviews, earning him October's Most Thorough Reviewer award. Richard
used our review form to the max and added his notes and comments on
important stories from the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/372681/reviews/116997">Chicago Tribune</a>, the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/356985/reviews/116448">Daily Beast </a>and more.<br /><br />The reviewer whose reviews are the most thorough -- filling out most or all fields of the review form -- wins the Most In-Depth Reviewer award for the month. We calculate this by finding the average number of answers a reviewer provides; the reviewer must have done ten or more story reviews to qualify.<br /><br /><strong>  Most Active Reviewer</strong> <br />The Most Active Reviewer award goes to NewsTrust <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/dwight-rousu">NewsHound Dwight Rousu</a>,
who reviewed 135 stories in the month of October. That's an average of
more than 4 story reviews per day. On top of that, Dwight often had a
quip to go along with his ratings.<br /><br />The Most Active Reviewer is a simple but key award that goes to the reviewer who posted the most story reviews for the month.<strong><br /><br />Highest Rated Post </strong><br /><a href="http://newstrust.net/members/patricia-blochowiak">Patricia Blochowiak</a> is the winner of the October award for Highest Rated Post, for posting <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/290588">"More is Less,"</a> a top-rated podcast from NPR's <em>This American Life</em>,
that investigated forces behind rising health care costs. The story
garnered an overall rating of 4.6 from NewsTrust members. <br /><br />The award for Highest Rated Post goes to the member who posted the story that got the most favorable reviews from other trusted members. To qualify, the story must have at least five reviews.  <br /><br /><strong>Most Reviewed Post </strong><br />October's winner for Most Reviewed Post is <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/cynthia-gilbert">Cynthia Gilbert</a>, who posted <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316">"Tricky o's 'doctored' photo"</a>
from the New York Post. Seventeen NewsTrust members reviewed the news
report, which got an overall rating of 2.1 (Cynthia gave it a 1.3),
earning it a spot as one of the featured stories during our <em><a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism-results.html">Bad Journalism News Hunt</a></em>.   <br /><br />The member who posts the story with the most reviews earns this award for the month. Candidates must have received five or more favorable reviews from trusted members to win this prize.   <br /><br /><strong>Trusted Member of the Month  </strong><br />Our Trusted Member of the Month is <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/jo-bobenhouse-smith">Jo Bobenhouse Smith</a>, whose frequent reviews and thoughtful notes helped our ratings of some of October's most important news items. Since signing up in October, Jo has reviewed well over 100 stories -- thank you for your wonderful contributions, Jo!<br /><br />The Trusted Member award goes to the member who, through his or her reviews and other activity on the site, best embodies the NewsTrust spirit in the eyes of the editors. Candidates must have done ten or more reviews, and their validation must have increased to a three or more in the past month.</p>

<p>As a small token of our appreciation, we are sending each of this month's winners this NewsTrust mug:<br /><br /><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a6acfe41970c-pi" style="display: inline;"><img alt="-1" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a6acfe41970c " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a6acfe41970c-800wi" style="width: 174px; height: 142px;" title="-1" /></a> </p>

<p><br /><strong>Win a Member Award  </strong><br /> If you are a regular NewsTrust reviewer, you too could win one of our monthly awards. Here are some of the ways you can qualify for a member award and increase your own member level:<em><br /></em></p><p><em>• Review often</em><strong> </strong><br />Our top rated reviewers
review and post stories regularly and thoroughly. Try to review at
least a couple times per week and answer as many questions as you can.
To review stories on our site, click 'Review' next to any story title;
a good place to start is our <a href="http://newstrust.net/">home page</a>.<strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;"><br /><br />• Focus on the journalism</span></em> </strong><br />Here
at NewsTrust, we try to rate stories based on the quality of the
journalism, not whether we agree with the views presented in these
stories. For tips on how to review on our site, check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">review guide</a>.  <em><br /><br />• Fill your profile</em><strong> </strong><br />Take a moment to update your <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/my_account#profile">member profile</a>,
so other members can get to know you. The more you share about
yourself, the higher your member level, and the more your ratings
count. Be sure to <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/my_account#picture">add a picture</a> if you can.  </p><p><strong> How Member Awards Work </strong><br /> At the end of each month, NewsTrust
editors tally the results for each award and announce the winners in a
blog post and email newsletter.
Winners can only win one award per year. If they qualify for two
awards in the same month, they're awarded the "higher" prize.   NewsTrust staff and
directors cannot not qualify for these awards. Member awards
will be given through the end of the year, for reviews posted in November and December. Tell us what you think of
this new community program. Drop a comment here on the blog -- or email us
directly at editors-at-newstrust.net.</p>

<p><br /><strong>Support our Work</strong><br />This week, we're calling on you to support our work by making a <a href="http://newstrust.net/donate">personal donation</a> to NewsTrust. For the past three years, we've provided our free public service thanks to the MacArthur Foundation, the Ashoka Foundation, the Ayrshire Foundation, the Sunlight Foundation, Hap Perry, Mitch Kapor, Craig Newmark and many other generous donors. But the economic crisis has changed everything, and foundation grants or large donations have become very scarce. <br /><br />So we're turning to valued members like you to support our cause. Our continued growth depends on you. If you find our service useful, please <a href="http://newstrust.net/donate">donate today</a>, so we can continue to help citizens find quality news --<br />and make informed decisions. Your contribution will fund site improvements, new tools, community outreach, news literacy programs and much more. We're independent and nonprofit, which means anything you give goes directly to our cause -- and it's <a href="http://newstrust.net/donate">tax-deductible</a>.<br /><br />Help us promote good, reliable journalism -- <a href="http://newstrust.net/donate">make a donation to NewsTrust today</a>!<br /><br />
<a href="http://newstrust.net/donate" style="display: inline; font-family: yui-tmp;"><img alt="-1" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a6ad01d3970c " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a6ad01d3970c-800wi" title="-1" /></a> <br /> </p>

<p>by Derek Hawkins, Kaizar Campwala and Fabrice Florin</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Bad Journalism: News Hunt Results</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism-results.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism-results.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a626fc92970b</id>
        <published>2009-10-28T12:45:20-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-10T15:40:16-08:00</updated>
        <summary>Last week, we hosted our first-ever News Hunt for Bad Journalism, to identify news reports and opinions with serious flaws -- stories that we found inaccurate, biased, irresponsible or superficial. With the help of professor Sally Lehrman and her journalism...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/least_trusted?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25" style="float: right;"&gt;&lt;img  alt="Glenn_beck_column" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a674d988970b " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a674d988970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" title="Glenn_beck_column" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Last week, we hosted our first-ever &lt;a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism.html"&gt;News Hunt for Bad Journalism&lt;/a&gt;, to identify news reports and opinions with serious flaws -- stories that we found inaccurate, biased, irresponsible or superficial.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;With the help of professor &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/sally-lehrman"&gt;Sally Lehrman&lt;/a&gt; and her journalism students from &lt;a href="http://www.scu.edu/cas/comm/academics/Journalism_SCU.cfm"&gt;Santa Clara University&lt;/a&gt;, we reviewed a wide range of news reports, blog posts, columns, cable news and radio talk shows from across the political spectrum. (See SCU's own&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.scu.edu/fyi/blog.cfm?b=136&amp;c=5920"&gt;news release&lt;/a&gt; about this project)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;For an overview of this &lt;em&gt;News Hunt&lt;/em&gt;, check our original &lt;a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism.html"&gt;blog post&lt;/a&gt; (which was updated throughout the week with new stories for review). Together, we posted 32 stories which we considered to be bad journalism, 21 of which received a NewsTrust rating. For a full listing of stories reviewed in this News Hunt, check all our &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/all_rated_stories?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25"&gt;rated stories&lt;/a&gt;, as well as our&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/least_trusted?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25"&gt;least trusted stories&lt;/a&gt; posted in the past 90 days.&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;Here are the results of this&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;News Hunt for Bad Journalism&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Least Trusted Stories&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
For this&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;News Hunt&lt;/em&gt;,&amp;nbsp;NewsTrust editors hand-picked stories for review, focusing mostly on political topics covered by mainstream sources, with the goal of highlighting flawed or questionable stories from some of the news outlets that people read and watch most (e.g. cable news and talk radio). We also took great care to feature stories representing political viewpoints from the left, right and center. What we wound up with is not a "worst of the worst" list, but a roundup of stories from a variety of media that our staff and community found to be examples of bad journalism.&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;Here are some of our &lt;a href:"http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/least_trusted?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25"&gt;least trusted stories&lt;/a&gt; for this &lt;em&gt;News Hunt&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;News Report (U.S.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316/toolbar"&gt;Tricky o's 'doctored' photo&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Charles Hurt&lt;/strong&gt; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;News Report (U.K.)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/195567/toolbar"&gt;Racial tension simmers on Martha's Vineyard as Barack Obama arrives&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Daily Telegraph&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Opinion from the Right&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/320361/toolbar"&gt;Excuses wearing thin for Obama, media pals&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Steve Huntly&lt;/strong&gt; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chicago Sun Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Opinion from the Left&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328894/toolbar"&gt;Republicans hit new low&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Randi Rhodes&lt;/strong&gt; (blog)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cable News Pundit from the Right&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322948/toolbar"&gt;What's Obama gonna give me?&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Glenn Beck&lt;/strong&gt; - &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Fox News&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt; (video)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Cable News Pundit from the Left&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322994/toolbar"&gt;Conservative infighting dismantles GOP&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Keith Olbermann&lt;/strong&gt; - &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;MSNBC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (video)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Media Watchdog from the Right&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/281663/toolbar"&gt;MSNBC Goes Into Astroturf Mode&lt;/a&gt; by &lt;strong&gt;Jeff Poor&lt;/strong&gt; - &lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Newsbusters&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Media Watchdog from the Left&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332044/toolbar"&gt;Attack on White House criticism of Fox follows years of GOP assaults on media&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;- &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Media Matters&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;We compared different types of stories throughout this&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;News Hunt&lt;span style="font-style: normal;"&gt;: news reports on Monday, opinions on Tuesday, pundits from the right on Wednesday,&amp;nbsp;pundits from the left on Thursday, media watchdogs on Friday, and&amp;nbsp;fact-checkers&amp;nbsp;on Saturday. &amp;nbsp;Here are our findings for each category.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Biased News Reports&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of the three news reports we featured, reviewers noted sourcing and fairness as major problems. They were most aggressive with &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316/toolbar?go=review"&gt;"Tricky o's 'doctored' photo"&lt;/a&gt; from the New York Post, which decried a group of physicians President Obama invited to the White House to show their support for health care reform. The story quoted two Republican opponents of reform, but didn't seek comments from the doctors themselves -- nor the reported "thousands" in the medical community who oppose reform. "The author makes many claims that are not backed up with evidence," Danielle S. Scharf &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316/reviews/114914"&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt;. "This article is very opinionated and one-sided."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An article on the Obama Administration's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/313889/toolbar?go=review"&gt;criticism of Fox News&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;em&gt;written by&lt;/em&gt; Fox News -- quoted the network's staff and commentators, including Karl Rove, but did not seek response from White House officials or third-party sources. And an &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/195567/toolbar?go=review"&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; in the Telegraph on Obama's summer visit to Martha's Vineyard contained no interviews, only quotes from the comments section of a local newspaper. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Irresponsible Opinions&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;The opinions we reviewed were harder to pin down. Our reviews tended to involve questions of responsibility and context, rather than the more straightforward principles of fairness and sourcing (which are not required for opinions, unlike news reports). An op-ed from the Chicago Sun-Times overwhelmingly earned our community's disapproval: presumptive and short on factual evidence, Steve Huntly's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/320361/toolbar?go=review"&gt;"Excuses wearing thin for Obama, media pals"&lt;/a&gt; was condemned by almost all of the NewsTrust members who reviewed it -- Huntly "makes assertion upon assertion but fails to provide documentation," &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/peter-henry"&gt;Peter Henry&lt;/a&gt; said in his review. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our community was split on the other two opinions we featured in this comparison: &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/271308/toolbar?go=review"&gt;"Lack of universal health care is a mass killer"&lt;/a&gt; from the Progressive received a mediocre 3.0, while &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/311118/toolbar"&gt;"Why Fox News is un-American"&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;from Newsweek received a 3.5 overall -- but widely divergent ratings from different members (compare reviews from SCU student &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/311118/reviews/115576"&gt;Christine Ahlstrom&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/311118/reviews/114761"&gt;Jim Lang&lt;/a&gt;). Join the discussion and add your reviews to these stories. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Worst Pundits from the Right and Left&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Wednesday and Thursday we examined stories from some of the most contentious and notoriously partisan names in broadcast journalism. Our community readily called out cable and radio pundits for their political bias, lack of fairness and cherry-picking of facts, and our overall ratings don't reflect a favoritism for either side. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;From the right, we reviewed clips from Fox News's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/324289/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Sean Hannity&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322948/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Glenn Beck&lt;/a&gt;, and a comment from &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322996/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Rush Limbaugh's&lt;/a&gt; radio show. We followed a similar pattern for those on the left, reviewing clips from MSNBC's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322994/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Keith Olbermann&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328795/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Rachael Maddow&lt;/a&gt;, and a blog post from liberal radio personality &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328894/toolbar?go=review"&gt;Randi Rhodes&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The highest rated was Maddow's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328795/toolbar?go=review"&gt;"Keeping the pressure on Reid,"&lt;/a&gt; which received a poor 2.8; Beck's &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328795/toolbar?go=review"&gt;"What's Obama gonna give me"&lt;/a&gt; scored lowest at 1.6.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Partisan Media Watchdogs&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;Media critics and watchdogs can be a valuable resource to identify bad journalism. But we found that&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: normal;"&gt;some media watchdogs have their own political agendas, leading them to spread more bias and misinformation as a result&lt;/span&gt;. A NewsBusters &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332167/toolbar?go=review"&gt;analysis&lt;/a&gt; called Keith Olbermann hypocritical for "cheerleading" the Obama Administration's fight with Fox News after having defended MSNBC against similar charges from the Bush Administration; several of our members criticized it for being shallow, unfair and poorly contextualized. An almost &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332044/toolbar?go=review"&gt;mirror-image story&lt;/a&gt; from Media Matters slammed Republican leaders for a history of attacks on media outlets, including CNN and the New York Times. Our reviewers pointed out that neither piece commented on whether either administration's media strategy was &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332044/reviews/115372"&gt;effective&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332167/reviews/115594"&gt;justified&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Neutral Fact-Checkers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;We&amp;nbsp;closed out our &lt;em&gt;News Hunt for Bad Journalism&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;on a positive note, by featuring some of our most trusted fact-checkers. The final two stories we reviewed in this News Hunt received overwhelmingly positive reviews. PolitiFact &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/334220/toolbar?go=review"&gt;compiled a list&lt;/a&gt; of "recent distortions" and "a few truthful statements" about health care reform and offered brief explanations of why each was false or accurate. And FactCheck &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332036/toolbar?go=review"&gt;looked at&lt;/a&gt; the ambiguity of polls attempting to measure public attitudes toward a government-run health insurance program. Both of these stories were carefully non-partisan, supported by ample factual evidence and consulted multiple independent sources in their analysis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For a full listing of the stories we reviewed last week, visit our &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/all_rated_stories?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25"&gt;rated stories page&lt;/a&gt; -- and for a list of our lowest-rated stories, check our &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/least_trusted?end_date=2009.10.25&amp;start_date=2009.7.25"&gt;least trusted stories&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Thanks to our partners&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;We'd like to thank Santa Clara University professor &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/sally-lehrman"&gt;Sally Lehrman&lt;/a&gt; and her journalism students for participating in our first &lt;em&gt;News Hunt for Bad Journalism&lt;/em&gt; last week. Kudos to the following, who added their reviews to some of the news and opinion we posted: &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/danielle-s-scharf"&gt;Danielle S. Scharf&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/christine-ahlstrom"&gt;Christine Ahlstrom&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/megan-wirth"&gt;Megan Wirth&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/kathryn-klein"&gt;Kathryn Klein&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/taylor-bernal"&gt;Taylor Bernal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/krista-kelley"&gt;Krista Kelley&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/xenia-pineda"&gt;Xenia Pineda&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/morgan-doherty"&gt;Morgan Doherty&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/ada-onuegbe"&gt;Ada Onuegbe&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We'd also like to thank our advisors &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=3&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAC&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.smartmobs.com%2F&amp;ei=lM_nSpCkD8-h8AauuvGdBw&amp;usg=AFQjCNFowV0NYwv_lanxU5zVngbcv6RI1A&amp;sig2=HCqR1_BswLBfygZj9dD0Mw"&gt;Howard Rheingold&lt;/a&gt; (Stanford University) and &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/members/michael-bugeja"&gt;Michael Bugeja&lt;/a&gt; (Iowa State University), who wrote the NewsTrust News Literacy Guides that we use as reference in our searches for good -- and bad -- journalism. Howard recently published &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/crap-detection-101"&gt;"Crap Detection 101"&lt;/a&gt; and Michael penned &lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/think-like-a-journalist"&gt;"Think Like a Journalist." &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;If you come across other examples of bad journalism in coming months, please&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/post"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; them on our site (be sure to tag them "Bad Journalism" under "Topics," so the stories will be listed in our &lt;em&gt;Bad Journalism &lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;pages).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism" &gt;&lt;img  alt="BadJournalismNewsHuntBadge" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e201287576853e970c  selected" src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e201287576853e970c-800wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" title="BadJournalismNewsHuntBadge" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; 

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Support our work&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you think NewsTrust provides a valuable service, please consider making a&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.newstrust.net/donate"&gt;donation&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;to our cause. Your contribution will help promote good journalism -- and pay for quality news feeds, new tools, site improvements, community outreach and educational programs. We're nonprofit and funded through grants and donations from members like you. Can you show your support today with a one-time, tax-deductible&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.newstrust.net/donate"&gt;donation&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-- by Derek Hawkins and Fabrice Florin, with Kaizar Campwala&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Photo: AP&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Help Expose Bad Journalism</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/bad-journalism.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-10-19T18:12:37-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5ee2b9f970b</id>
        <published>2009-10-19T12:43:20-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-28T10:44:49-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This week, help us promote good journalism by exposing the bad. Bad Journalism News Hunt From Monday through Sunday, we'll be hosting a News Hunt for Bad Journalism, to highlight journalism with serious flaws -- news reports and opinions that...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Community News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social News and Filters" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="bad journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="bias" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="good journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="inaccurate" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="irresponsible" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news hunt" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="newstrust" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="opinion" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ratings" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="reviews" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="santa clara university" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="scu" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social networks" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news network" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="spin" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="superficial" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This week, help us promote good journalism by exposing the bad.</p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Bad Journalism News Hunt</span><br />
From Monday through Sunday, we'll be hosting a <em><a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism">News Hunt for Bad Journalism</a></em>, to highlight journalism with serious flaws -- news reports and opinions that are inaccurate, biased, irresponsible or superficial. For this special <em>News Hunt</em>, we will be joined by journalism students from <a href="http://www.scu.edu/cas/comm/academics/Journalism_SCU.cfm">Santa Clara University</a>, led by professor Sally Lehrman. </p>

<p />

<p>Each day this week, we'll feature different examples of bad journalism from a variety of sources across the political spectrum, and ask you to rate them, so we can identify the worst stories at the end of the week. Here's how we're breaking it down: </p>

<ul>
<li>Monday - News Reports</li>
<li>Tuesday - Opinions</li>
<li>Wednesday - Pundits from the Right</li>
<li>Thursday - Pundits from the Left</li>
<li>Friday - Media Watchdogs </li>
<li>Saturday - Fact-Checkers</li>
</ul>

<p />

<p>(note that this blog post was updated throughout the week with new stories for review -- see below)</p>

<p><strong>News Literacy Guides</strong><br />
Since this <span style="font-style: italic;">News Hunt for Bad Journalism</span> is a departure from our normal routine, we encourage you to consult our <em>News Literacy Guides</em> for helpful tips. First, read these articles from two of our esteemed advisors, who are both journalism professors:</p>

<p />

<ul>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/crap-detection-101">"Crap Detection 101"</a> by Howard Rheingold (Stanford University)</li>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/think-like-a-journalist">"Think Like a Journalist"</a> by Michael Bugeja (Iowa State University)</li>
</ul>

<p />

<p>Also check out NewsTrust's <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">Quick Review Guide</a> on how to review a story. These articles and tutorials will help you ask the right questions and quickly identify bias, misinformation, weak sourcing, shallowness and other problems in reporting.</p>

<p />

<br />

<p><strong>News Comparisons</strong><br />How do you rate the stories below? Throughout this week, we've compared questionable stories from several categories. </p>

<p />

<p><span style="font-weight: bold; ">News Reports</span></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/313889/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Obama team continues efforts to isolate Fox News</a> - <em>Fox News</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Tricky o's 'doctored' photo</a> - <em>New York Post</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/195567/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Racial tension on Martha's Vineyard simmers as Barack Obama arrives</a> - <em>Daily Telegraph</em></p>

<p />

<p><strong>Opinions</strong></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/320361/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Excuses wearing thin for Obama, media pals</a> - <em>Chicago Sun-Times</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/271308/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Lack of universal health care is a mass killer</a> - <em>The Progressive</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/311118/toolbar?go=review" target="_blank">Why Fox News is un-American</a> - <em>Newsweek</em></p>

<p />

<p><strong>Pundits from the Right</strong></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322948/toolbar?go=review">What's Obama gonna give me?</a> - Glenn Beck (<em>Fox News</em>)<br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322996/toolbar?go=review">America 2009: Banana Republic</a> - Rush Limbaugh (<em>Rush Limbaugh Show</em>)<br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/324289/toolbar?go=review">Does Kevin Jennings support NAMBLA?</a> - Sean Hannity (<em>Fox News</em>)</p>

<p />

<p><strong>Pundits from the Left</strong></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/322994/toolbar?go=review">Conservative infighting dismantles GOP</a> - Keith Olbermann (<em>Countdown</em>)<br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328894/toolbar?go=review">Republicans hit new low</a> - Randi Rhodes (<em>Randi Rhodes Show</em>)<br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/328795/toolbar?go=review">Keeping the pressure on Reid</a> - Rachel Maddow (<em>The Rachel Maddow Show</em>)</p>

<p />

<p><span style="font-weight: bold; ">Media Watchdogs</span></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332661/toolbar?go=review">Neutralizing the opposition</a> - <em>Washington Post</em> - by Howard Kurtz<br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332044/toolbar?go=review">Attack on White House criticism of Fox follows years of GOP assaults on media</a> - <em>Media Matters</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332167/toolbar?go=review">Obama bashed Bush Administration for criticizing NBC in 2008</a> - <em>NewsBusters</em> - by Noel Sheppard</p>

<p />

<p><strong>Fact-Checkers</strong></p>

<p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/334220/toolbar?go=review">Health care reform: A summary of recent distortions</a> - <em>PolitiFact</em><br /><br />
• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/332036/toolbar?go=review">Heather Graham Teaches Us About Polls</a> - <em>FactCheck</em></p>


<p />


<p>Join our <em>News Hunt </em>this week,to help us expose more stories that<span style="font-size: 13px; font-family: Arial;"> fail to uphold the journalistic standards that citizens rely on. To keep track of our scores, check</span> our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism/least_trusted">Least Trusted Stories</a> page (listing our lowest-rated stories so far), as well as our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism">Bad Journalism</a> page (featuring recent stories for review).</p>

<p>And if you come across another example of bad journalism, please <a href="http://newstrust.net/post">post</a> it on our site (be sure to tag it "Bad Journalism" under "Topics," so it will be listed in our <em>News Hunt</em> pages).</p>

<p />

<br />


<p><a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/bad_journalism" style="display: inline;"><img alt="-1" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5f04f5f970b selected " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5f04f5f970b-800wi" title="-1" /></a> <br /> </p>

<p />

<br />


<p><strong>Make A Donation</strong><br />If you believe in our cause, please consider making a <a href="http://www.newstrust.net/donate">donation</a> to NewsTrust. Your contribution will help promote good journalism -- and pay for quality news feeds, new tools, site improvements, community outreach and educational programs. We're nonprofit and funded through grants and donations from members like you. Can you show your support today with a one-time, tax-deductible <a href="http://www.newstrust.net/donate">donation</a>?</p>

<p />

<p>-- by Fabrice Florin, Derek Hawkins and Kaizar Campwala</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Health Care News Hunt - Final Results</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/health-care-results.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/health-care-results.html" thr:count="3" thr:updated="2009-10-26T21:50:12-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a63b2b29970c</id>
        <published>2009-10-14T12:05:02-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-14T13:15:12-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Tuesday we wrapped up a 10-day Health Care News Hunt with the Huffington Post and its Eyes and Ears team. For an overview of this collaboration, check our HuffPost partner Matt Palevsky's first blog post, as well as our...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Community News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social News and Filters" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="good journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health care" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health care reform" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huff post" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huffington post" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huffpost" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news hunt" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="newstrust" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="opinion" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="public option" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="quality news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ratings" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="reviews" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social networks" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news network" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>
</p>

<p>On Tuesday we wrapped up a 10-day <em>Health Care News Hunt</em> with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/">Huffington Post</a> and its <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eyes-and-ears/">Eyes and Ears</a> team. For an overview of this collaboration, check our HuffPost partner Matt Palevsky's first <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-palevsky/health-care-news-hunt-mak_b_268359.html">blog post</a>, as well as our own <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/healthcare-huffpo.html">project update</a>.</p>

<p>With the help of our hosts, <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/kristin-gorski">Kristin Gorski</a> and <a href="http://http://newstrust.net/members/patricia-blochowiak">Patricia Blochowiak</a>, as well as 95 new members from the Huffington Post, we posted about 146 health care stories, 51 of which received a NewsTrust rating.  Recent stories on this topic can be found on our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care</a> page.</p>

<p>Here are the final results of our <em>Health Care News Hunt</em>.</p>

<p><strong>Top Rated Stories on Health Care</strong><br />Here are some of our top rated stories for this <em>News Hunt</em>:</p>

<p />

<ul>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/290588/toolbar">More is Less</a> - This American Life / NPR (podcast, 1 hour)</li>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/278093/toolbar">In Netherlands, Insurers Compete Over Quality of Care</a> - NewsHour / PBS (video)</li>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/279260/toolbar">Going Out of Business?</a> - FactCheck (News Analysis)</li>
<li><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/opinion/06mcgarr.html">A Texas-Sized Health Care Failure</a> - New York Times (Opinion) (<a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272848/">see reviews</a>)</li>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/289765/toolbar">The Lie Machine</a> - Rolling Stone (Special Report)</li>
<li><a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/274269/toolbar">"Don't Get Sick": The Truth About GOP Health Plans?</a> - Huffington Post (News Analysis)</li>
</ul>
<p /><p>For a full listing of health care stories reviewed in this News Hunt, check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care/top_rated?end_date=2009.10.13&amp;page=1&amp;start_date=2009.10.03">top rated stories</a>, as well as the list of <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care/top_stories?end_date=2009.10.13&amp;page=1&amp;start_date=2009.10.03">all stories</a> posted in the past 10 days.</p>

<p>We focused on different types of stories throughout this <span style="font-style: italic; ">News Hunt<span style="font-style: normal; ">: mainstream news on Monday, opinions on Tuesday, TV news on Wednesday, fact-checkers on Thursday, comedy news on Friday, worst journalism on Saturday, and breaking news in the final days.  Here are our findings for each category.</span></span></p>

 <p><strong>News Reports - The Public Option</strong><br />We began our <em>News Hunt</em> last Monday, October 5th, by comparing news reports on debate in Congress over whether to include a government-run insurance plan -- a "public option" -- in a final health care reform bill. Most news stories we reviewed focused on how Congress would merge a bill that contains a public option provision with one that doesn't. Our top stories came from the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/267074/toolbar">Great Falls Tribune</a>, the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/270722/toolbar">Hill</a>, and <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272963/toolbar">Salon</a> (read our original analysis <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/healthcare-huffpo.html">here</a>).</p>

<p><strong>Opinions - The Public Option<br /></strong>The following Tuesday we compared three opinions that took different views on the controversial public insurance measure. A Republican state senator from Maryland <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/273965/toolbar">argued against it</a> in the Baltimore Sun; the founder of a failed insurance exchange firm wrote in the New York Times that without a public option <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272848">reform would be ineffectual</a>; and a blogger from Think Progress said <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272722/toolbar">political maneuvering</a> is the Democrats' best hope for slipping the controversial measure past Republicans. Our community posted more than 20 reviews on these stories and found Cappy McGarr's op-ed in the Times to be most insightful (read our full results <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/healthcare-huffpo.html">here</a>).</p>

<p />

<p><strong>TV News on Health Care</strong><br />On Wednesday we featured TV news on health care. Our top rated video came from PBS's NewsHour, which <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/278093/toolbar">examined</a> the health care system in the Netherlands and the overhaul that took place there in 2006. The special report garnered high ratings from a dozen reviewers, who were  impressed by its detail and diversity of sourcing. <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/276649/">Fox News</a> and <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/277743/">MSNBC</a> ran news reports on the public option, which our community dismissed as too partisan. <br /><strong><br />Fact-Checkers on Health Care</strong><br />Since arguments over how to reform the nation's health care system boiled over with misinformation and accusation this summer, we've gone out of our way to feature those news outlets that scrutinize claims from all sides. On Thursday we focused on news analysis from fact-checkers and found that matters had calmed down significantly since August's <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/08/sparring-results1.html">death panel rumors</a> dominated coverage. </p>

<p>FactCheck.org <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/279260/toolbar">debunked</a> a new health care ad from Americans for Prosperity that purported Medicare will be bankrupt in eight years. "Yikes," FactCheck wrote: <br /><br />"Quite a scary claim to make about a program that <a href="http://www.kff.org/medicare/upload/7731.pdf">encompasses</a> 16 percent of the federal budget and benefits <a href="http://www.kff.org/medicare/">45 million Americans</a>. But the word "bankrupt" is far too strong to accurately describe Medicare’s problems. ... We don’t mean to say that the projections about the future of the HI trust fund shouldn’t be taken seriously, or that Medicare in general
isn’t facing long-term funding issues. But it’s not going to be
“bankrupt in eight years.”<br /><br />We also featured the indefatigable PolitiFact's excellent <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/281940/toolbar">roundup of high-profile statements about health care</a>, as rated on their Pulitzer Prize-winning Trust-O-Meter. Nine pages of vetted public statements earned a high rating from NewsTrust -- and we'll be checking back as a reform bill makes its way through Congress.</p>

<p />

<p><strong>Comedy News on Health Care</strong><br />We closed out  our week with a comparison of three Daily Show clips on the health care debate -- two from August and one from September -- to see how leading news comedian and media critic Jon Stewart had covered this topic. In his most recent clip, Stewart <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/285170/toolbar">knocked</a> Democrats in Congress for failing to include a public option in the Finance Committee's bill, despite holding a super majority in the Senate. </p>

<p />

<p><strong>Bad Journalism on Health Care<br /></strong>Over the weekend, we compared our dogs of the week -- the lowest-rated stories we found on health care. "<a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/276452/">What we would have told Obama</a>" from Fox News, "<a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/275316">Tricky 'O's doctored photo</a>" from the New York Post, and a <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/281663">news analysis</a> from NewsBusters each received a rating of 2.0 or lower from our community. </p>

<p />

<p><strong>Breaking News: Insurance Industry Report<br /></strong>This Monday, October 12th, ahead of the Finance Committee's vote, the accounting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC) released a report commissioned by the top health insurance industry trade group that said reform proposals in Congress would increase costs for American families.  The report was cited in most stories we reviewed on the Finance Committee's vote -- and drew swift condemnation from the White House, Congressional Democrats and many observers. We rounded up reactions from prominent health care bloggers. </p>

<p>Ezra Klein, of the Washington Post, was extremely critical, <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/293569/toolbar">comparing</a> the report to similar studies conducted by PWC on behalf of tobacco companies:</p>

<p>"[I]f the PWC's report doesn't offer much in the way of trustworthy
policy analysis, it is an interesting looking at the changing politics
of the issue. In short, the insurance industry is getting scared. After
many months of quiet constructiveness, they're launching a broadside on
the week of the Senate Finance Committee's vote. The White House, which
had a pleasant meeting with the industry's leadership last week, was
shocked by the report, and so too was the Senate Finance Committee. The
era of cooperation seems to be over, and they weren't given much
advance warning. But the report might have another impact, too: The
evident anger and fear of the insurance industry might do a bit to
reassure liberals that this plan is worth supporting, after all."<br /><br />The New Republic's Jonathan Cohn <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/292282/toolbar">noted</a> several omissions and inconsistencies in the PWC report, and in an update said the insurance industry's conflict of interest was all too clear. And Kevin Drum, of Mother Jones, <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/293901/toolbar">said</a> a weakening of the penalty in the Baucus Bill for not purchasing health insurance probably motivated the report.</p>

<p />

<p><strong>Breaking News: Senate Finance Committee Votes</strong><br />Our <em>News Hunt</em> ended this Tuesday with breaking news coverage of the highly anticipated vote on the Senate Finance Committee's health care bill. Nicknamed the "Baucus Bill" after Sen. Max Baucus, the Democratic committee chairman, the legislation won approval yesterday with 13 Democratic votes and one Republican vote from Maine Senator Olympia Snowe. </p>

<p>The Politico <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/297722/toolbar">portrayed</a> the vote as a milestone for both Baucus and President Obama, who has repeatedly called health care his top domestic priority. And since the committee was widely expected to approve the bill along party lines, several publications featured the defection of Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe as a key aspect of the story -- but some news outlets were split over just how her vote was secured. <br /><br />"The vote moves President Barack Obama's goal of overhauling the nation’s health care system one step closer to reality," the Politico wrote, adding: <br /><br />"Baucus’s hand was strengthened markedly when Snowe became the only Senate Republicans to vote for health reform —- ending weeks of
speculation about whether any Republicans would sign onto the
Democratic reform bill."<br /><br />
But <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/297718/toolbar">according to</a> the LA Times, Snowe's vote was less an achievement for Baucus than for the White House, "which had
heavily courted Snowe, and it allowed overhaul advocates to claim that
there was a vestige of GOP support for the measure." Bloomberg <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/297724/toolbar">echoed</a> this notion in its story on the vote: <br /><br />"That marked the first time a Republican in either the Democratic-controlled Senate or House has supported the revamp legislation, President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. ... Baucus had spent months courting Snowe and other Republicans, making his committee the last of five congressional panels to complete its version of the legislation."</p>

<p><span style="font-weight: bold; ">Thanks to our Partners and Hosts</span></p>

<p>We'd like to thank our partners at the<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/"> Huffington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eyes-and-ears/">Eyes and Ears</a> for making this a lively and successful News Hunt! It was a pleasure to work with HuffPost Citizen Journalism Editor <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-palevsky/roundup-best-health-care_b_314319.html">Matt Palevsky</a>, as well as HuffPost Politics editors Dan Froomkin and Rachel Weiner, and all 95 Huffington Post members, who made invaluable contributions to our search for great journalism on health care. Kudos as well to our gracious hosts <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/kristin-gorski">Kristin Gorski</a> and <a href="http://http://newstrust.net/members/patricia-blochowiak">Patricia Blochowiak</a>, who led our community in this effort, reviewing dozens of stories and posting some true journalistic gems on this important issue. Last but not least, we're deeply grateful to our wonderful NewsTrust reviewers. Your collective recommendations have helped thousands of citizens find health care journalism that is informative, substantive and meaningful to their lives. Many thanks to you all for your hard work and great insights!<br /><br />As Congress continues to negotiate a health care reform bill, we'll be tracking the best (and the worst) coverage from across the political spectrum on NewsTrust. Check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care</a> and <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/us_congress">U.S. Congress</a> topic pages to weigh in on the latest news and opinion on this landmark debate -- and if you find a great story on health care, be sure to <a href="http://newstrust.net/post">post</a> it on NewsTrust for review!</p>

<p>- by Derek Hawkins and Fabrice Florin, with Kaizar Campwala</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Health Care News Hunt Update</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/healthcare-huffpo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/healthcare-huffpo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5c981a5970b</id>
        <published>2009-10-07T11:37:58-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-07T11:47:46-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Monday we kicked off a week-long partnership with the Huffington Post and its Eyes and Ears team in to find great journalism about health care reform. For this Health Care News Hunt, our communities have teamed up to review...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Community News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social News and Filters" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="good journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health care" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health care reform" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="health news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huff post" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huffington post" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="huffpost" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="journalism" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news hunt" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="newstrust" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="opinion" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="public option" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="quality news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="ratings" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="reviews" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social networks" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="social news network" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>On Monday we kicked off a week-long partnership with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/">Huffington Post</a> and its <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eyes-and-ears/">Eyes and Ears</a> team in to find great journalism about <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">health care reform</a>. For this <em>Health Care News Hunt</em>, our communities have teamed up to review news coverage of the ongoing health care debate, as Congressional leaders negotiate how to merge competing versions of a reform bill. </p><p>We'd also like to give a warm welcome to the eighty new members who have signed up for this News Hunt from Huffington Post so far. Thanks for joining forces with us for this important cause! For tips on how to review on NewsTrust, read our <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">quick guide</a>. And if you haven't already, check our HuffPost partner Matt Palevsky's excellent <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matthew-palevsky/health-care-news-hunt-mak_b_268359.html" /><a href="http://">blog post</a> about our goals for this project.  </p><p>Here's an update on what we found so far, as well as as an invitation to review new stories today, with a focus on TV news coverage of this important issue.</p><p><strong>First Results</strong><br />Most of the news and opinions we've reviewed so far have dealt with the behind-the-scenes politics of passing reforms, as the bill enters the final stages of creation. This is a far cry from what we found in our <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/08/healthcare-reform.html">last Health Care News Hunt</a> in August, when coverage was dominated by raucous town hall meetings and false claims about "<a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/08/sparring-results1.html">death panels</a>." <br /><br />Yesterday, in our weekly <em>Sparring Opinions</em> feature, we asked NewsTrust members to review two op-eds and a blog post on whether Congress should include a provision for a government-run insurance program -- a "public option" -- in the bill it will put to a vote in coming weeks. A Republican state senator from Maryland <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/273965">argued against it</a> in the Baltimore Sun; the founder of a failed insurance exchange firm wrote in the New York Times that without a public option <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272848">reform would be ineffectual</a>; and a blogger from Think Progress said <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272722">political maneuvering</a> is the Democrats' best hope for slipping the controversial measure past Republicans. <br /><br />Based on 24 reviews between the three stories, our members rated Cappy McGarr's op-ed in the New York Times, "<a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272848">A Texas-sized health care failure</a>," highest. Founder of the now-defunct Texas Purchasing Alliance, McGarr wrote that personal experience convinced him health insurance exchanges -- a prominent alternative to the public option -- don't create enough competition to cut costs. "It would be smarter for Congress to revisit the idea of creating a
public plan that could provide an attractive choice for consumers and
real competition for private insurers, to give them the incentive to
offer good coverage at affordable prices," he concluded. <br /><br /><a href="http://newstrust.net/members/kristin-gorski">Kristin Gorski</a>, co-host of this week's Health Care News Hunt, called McGarr's story "compelling" and "clearly written," and <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/patricia-berrini">Patricia Berrini</a> gave it high marks for the author's expertise on the issue. <br /><br />Igor Volsky's blog post from Think Progress also received a positive rating, though several members, like <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/kiku-botura">Kiku Botura</a>, questioned the logic of waiting to add a public insurance option to the bill until late in deliberations. Our community dismissed the Baltimore Sun op-ed from Maryland State Senator Andy Harris for being light on factual evidence and rejecting the public option without explanation. <br /><br />On Monday we opened our News Hunt by comparing news and analysis on the public option from mainstream sources. News centered on Montana Senator Max Baucus, who, as chair of the Senate Finance Committee, has emerged as the key player in crafting a health care reform bill. <br /><br />The Great Falls Tribune, a daily newspaper from Baucus's home state, <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/267074/toolbar">wrote</a> that Baucus had upset Montana progressives when he voted against including a public option in his committee's bill. </p><blockquote>"Baucus said "there's a lot to like" about a public option — a
government-run insurance plan that would compete with private insurers
— but in the end Baucus said he didn't see how a health care reform
bill containing such a provision could pass the full Senate.<span class="aa" /></blockquote><blockquote><p><span class="pp" />"My
job is to put together a bill that will become law," Baucus told the
committee before voting "no" on two public-option amendments on
Tuesday. "In the Senate, that means my job is to put together a bill
that gets 60 votes. Now I can count, and no one has been able to show
me how they can get to 60 votes with a public option in the bill."<span class="aa" /></p><p><span class="pp" />... Baucus
says he supports the public option, having drafted a version of a
public-option plan in his white paper released last November. But
Baucus' critics say he has done little to try to make the public option
a reality."</p></blockquote><p>The Hill <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/270722/toolbar">reported</a> Baucus's decision pitted him against other Senate Democrats, including Majority Leader Harry Reid, who have vowed to deliver on a public option. </p><blockquote>"Having deferred the issue to Baucus this summer, Reid signaled on
Thursday that he is prepared to join Sens. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and
John Rockefeller (D-W.Va.), who both pushed a public option amendment
that failed in a committee vote last Tuesday.<br /><br />“We are going to
have a public option before this bill goes to the president's desk,"
Reid said in a conference call with constituents on Thursday, as
reported by the Las Vegas Sun. “I believe the public option is so
vitally important to create a level playing field and prevent the
insurance companies from taking advantage of us.”<br /><p>On the same
day, [Iowa Sen. Tom ] Harkin gave The Des Moines Register the same message, suggesting
clearly that he will side with Reid against Baucus."</p><p /></blockquote><p /><p>In a similar story, the Washington Post <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/267983/toolbar">suggested</a> negotiations could continue through November without the full support of Senate Democrats like Rockefeller and Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden, both of whom have said the current versions of reform bills are deficient. <br /><br />Meanwhile, the <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/269212/toolbar">Los Angeles Times</a> and <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272963/toolbar">Salon</a> both spoke with Congressional and White House aides who say that the Obama Administration has been privately working to shore up Senate support for the public option ahead of a vote. </p><p><strong>Today's Comparison: TV News on Health Care</strong><br />All week long we'll be searching for quality news and opinion on health care reform and the bill making its way through Congress now. </p><p>Today we're focusing on how TV news networks are covering this issue (see our recommended stories below); on Thursday we'll feature fact-checkers, and on Friday we'll feature comedy news. <br /><br />How are TV news networks covering the debate on health care reform? Which outlets are providing the best coverage, reporting on the issues with substance and balance? Try comparing these three TV news segments:</p><p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/278093/toolbar">In the Netherlands, insurers compete over quality of care</a> - <em>PBS NewsHour </em></p><p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/276649/toolbar">Breaking the bank?</a> - <em>Fox News</em><br /><br />• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/277743/toolbar">House behind a public option</a> - <em>MSNBC</em></p><p>Join our News Hunt with the Huffington Post and Eyes &amp; Ears -- visit our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care page</a> and review or <a href="http://newstrust.net/post">post</a> a story today. </p><p>-- by Derek Hawkins, with Fabrice Florin and Kaizar Campwala</p><p><a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Nt_badge_healthcare_newshunt" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a621353a970c " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a621353a970c-800wi" title="Nt_badge_healthcare_newshunt" /></a> <br /> </p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sparring Opinions: The Public Option</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/sparring-option.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/10/sparring-option.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a61af78c970c</id>
        <published>2009-10-06T12:13:05-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-06T12:15:10-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This week we are partnering with the Huffington Post and its Eyes and Ears team for a Health Care News Hunt. We would like to welcome our new members from Huffington Post and thank them for joining forces with us...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>This week we are partnering with the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/politics/">Huffington Post</a> and its <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eyes-and-ears/">Eyes and Ears</a> team for a <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care News Hunt</a>.<br /><br />We
would like to welcome our new members from Huffington Post and thank
them for joining forces with us to find quality news and opinion about
health care reform and the new bill that’s now being debated in
Congress. Each day this week, we're inviting you to compare stories
in different categories: mainstream news on Monday, opinions on
Tuesday, cable news on Wednesday, fact-checkers on Thursday, and comedy
news on Friday. <br /><br />Today, we're featuring <em>Sparring Opinions.</em> In recent weeks, debate over health care reform has hinged on whether Congress should include a controversial public insurance option in its final bill. For today's <em>Sparring Opinions, </em>we're comparing two op-eds and a blog post that offer different perspectives on this issue.<br /><br />Andy Harris, a Republican state Senator from Maryland, rejects a public insurance option, arguing that <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/273965/toolbar">insurance exchanges, along with other "common sense" reforms</a>, are the most effective way to lower costs: </p><blockquote>"Creating a health care "exchange" allows for affordable, accessible and portable insurance for millions of Americans. An "exchange" would let everyone choose their health care insurance from a broad range of options and allow their employer to help pay for it. Competition among insurers would bring down the cost of health care insurance, just as it brings down the cost of car or homeowners insurance."<br /></blockquote><br />In the <em>New York Times</em>, Cappy McGarr, founder of a failed insurance exchange firm in Texas, says he knows from experience that such alternatives to a public insurance program <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/opinion/06mcgarr.html">don't create enough competition to cut costs</a>: <br /><blockquote>"If Congress now creates new exchanges, as seems increasingly likely, it must prevent this phenomenon by setting two national rules: Insurers have to accept everyone and have to charge everyone the same rates regardless of health status.<br /><br />Such rules would force insurers to spread risk. But enforcement would also be difficult. ... It would be smarter for Congress to revisit the idea of creating a public plan that could provide an attractive choice for consumers and real competition for private insurers, to give them the incentive to offer good coverage at affordable prices."<br /></blockquote><br />Igor Volsky of <em>Think Progress</em> takes a different view entirely -- political maneuvering, he argues, is the only safe way for Congressional Democrats to <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272722/toolbar">secure a public insurance option in the final bill</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>"Excluding the public option from the Senate bill could broaden the health care debate. Republicans will complain that they need assurances that a public option won’t be added in during conference. They’ll spend more energy questioning the constitutionality of the individual mandate, the wisdom of eliminating the overpayments to private insurers participating in Medicare Advantage, rationing abortions to women, and ensuring that legal immigrants don’t have access to care ... Democrats will preserve the integrity of the public option. It will remain intact, away from reformers who seek to transform it into a co-op or a “network” of state-based public plans.<br /></blockquote><blockquote>Democrats could then add the public option to the final health care bill during conference, when they reconcile the House and Senate bills."<br /></blockquote><p><br />Which one of these do you find most insightful? Weigh in by adding your review to these three stories:<br /><br />• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/273965/toolbar">Reform, not overreach</a> - <em>Baltimore Sun</em><br /><br />• <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/06/opinion/06mcgarr.html">A Texas-sized health care failure</a> - <em>New York Times</em><br /><br />• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/272722/toolbar">Why Reid shouldn't include the public option in the merged Senate bill </a>- <em>Think Progress</em><br /><br />Thanks in advance for joining our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care News Hunt</a> this
week -- the more you review stories on health care reform, the more
informed we all get about this important topic. If you need tips on how
to review a story on our site, check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">quick review guide</a>.
You're also welcome to <a href="http://newstrust.net/post">post</a> new stories on this topic. If you
have any questions or comments, <a href="mailto:help@newstrust.net">email us</a>. Look forward to
seeing your reviews and posts on our <a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care">Health Care page</a>.<br /><br /><a href="http://newstrust.net/topics/health_care" style="display: inline; font-family: yui-tmp;"><img alt="Nt_badge_healthcare_newshunt" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5c53954970b " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5c53954970b-800wi" title="Nt_badge_healthcare_newshunt" /></a> </p><p>-- Derek Hawkins</p><p /></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Win a Member Award</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/awards.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/awards.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a601679c970c</id>
        <published>2009-09-30T11:12:49-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-05T13:22:08-08:00</updated>
        <summary>We're pleased to announce the NewsTrust Member Awards! Starting in October, NewsTrust will present monthly awards to some of of our best reviewers, to recognize their contributions in a variety of categories, such as Top Rated or Most Active Reviewer...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Community News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Social News and Filters" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Contest" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="news" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We're pleased to announce the NewsTrust Member Awards! </p>

<p>Starting in October, NewsTrust will present monthly awards to some of of our best reviewers, to recognize their contributions in a variety of categories, such as Top Rated or Most Active Reviewer (see below).</p>

<p>We hope this will give our most committed members the honor they deserve for their hard work and dedication to NewsTrust's <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">values</a>.</p>

<p>In the first week of November, NewsTrust editors will analyze member activity from October and announce the winners on this blog, as well as on our home page and email newsletters. (UPDATE: <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/11/oct-awards.html">Meet our Winners for October 2009</a>)</p>

<p>Here are the six awards we're offering for reviewers who participate in the month of October. All NewsTrust members are eligible -- good luck!</p>

<p />

<p><strong>• Top Rated Reviewer</strong><br />
This award will go to the member whose story reviews have the highest average rating for the month. The top rated reviewer must have completed ten or more reviews that month and received at least ten ratings from trusted members (with a member level of three or more).<strong><br /><br />• Most Thorough Reviewer<br /></strong>This award will go to the member whose reviews are the most in-depth, based on their average number of answers that month (e.g.: number of ratings, notes, links or quotes per review). The reviewer must have done ten or more story reviews that month to qualify.<strong><br /><br />• Most Active Reviewer<br /></strong>This award will go to the member who reviewed the most stories for the month. Ten or more reviews are needed to qualify.<strong><br /></strong></p>

<p />

<p><strong>• Top Rated Post<br /></strong>This award will go to the member who posted this month's top rated story. To qualify, this top rated story must have at least five reviews from trusted members. <strong><br /><br />• Most Reviewed Post<br /></strong>This award will go to the member who posted the story with the most reviews that month. To qualify, this story must have at least five favorable reviews from trusted members. <br /><br /><strong>• Trusted Member of the Month </strong><br />This award will go to the member who best applies the NewsTrust <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">values</a> in the eyes of the editors, through the quality of his or her reviews and other contributions to our cause. This member must have done ten or more reviews that month, these reviews must be favorably rated by other trusted members and his or her member level must be three or more.</p>

<p /><p>Member award winners will be featured on our home page, newsletters and blog, and will also receive a NewsTrust mug or similar gift, as a token of our appreciation.</p>

<p />

<p>Winners can only receive one award per year. NewsTrust staff and directors cannot not qualify for these awards. Member awards will be given for the next three months, through the end of the year.</p>

<p />

<p>Here are some of the ways you can qualify for a member award and increase your own member level:</p>

<p><em>• Review often</em><strong> </strong><br />Our top rated reviewers review and post stories regularly and thoroughly. Try to review at least a couple times per week and answer as many questions as you can. To review stories on our site, click 'Review' next to any story title; a good place to start is our <a href="http://newstrust.net/">home page</a>.</p>

<p><strong><em><span style="font-weight: normal;">• Focus on the journalism</span></em> </strong><br />Here at NewsTrust, we try to rate stories based on the quality of the journalism, not whether we agree with the views presented in these stories. For tips on how to review on our site, check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">review guide</a>.  </p>

<p><em>• Fill your profile</em><strong> </strong><br />Take a moment to update your <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/my_account#profile">member profile</a>, so other members can get to know you. The more you share about yourself, the higher your member level, and the more your ratings count. Be sure to <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/my_account#picture">add a picture</a> if you can.  </p><p>Do you know someone who also appreciates good journalism? Send them an <a href="http://newstrust.net/members/invite">invitation</a> to try out NewsTrust for themselves.<a href="http://newstrust.net/members/invite" target="_blank"><br /></a></p>

<p>Please tell us what you think about this new community program! Drop a comment here on the blog, or email us directly at editors-at-newstrust.net.</p><p>UPDATED 11/05/09</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sparring Opinions: Iran's Nuclear Program</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/sparring-iran.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/sparring-iran.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-09-29T18:15:13-07:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a60018f3970c</id>
        <published>2009-09-29T11:46:22-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-29T12:19:29-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Western leaders are reassessing their approach to Iran after recent disclosures about a secret nuclear facility and new missile tests. How should they address Iran's nuclear ambitions at this week's diplomatic talks in Geneva? How should President Obama approach Iran's...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Current Affairs" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="In the News" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Sparring Opinions" />
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="diplomacy" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Iran" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="nuclear power" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="nuclear weapons" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Obama" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Qom" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="Security Council" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="UN" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="United Nations" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Western leaders are reassessing their approach to Iran after recent
disclosures about a secret nuclear facility and new missile tests. How should they address Iran's nuclear ambitions at this week's diplomatic talks in Geneva? How should President Obama approach Iran's leadership? <br /><br />In today's <em>Sparring Opinions</em> we're comparing two op-eds that discuss these questions.<br /><br />Scott Ritter, a prominent UN weapons inspector, argues in the Guardian that Iran's disclosure of the facility in Qom <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/245359/toolbar">should not be met with tough language from Western leaders</a>. Iran's move, he writes, should mark a step toward non-proliferation: </p><p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">"the emergence of the
existence of the Qom enrichment facility could very well mark the
initiation of a period of even greater transparency on the part of
Iran, leading to its full adoption and implementation of the IAEA
additional protocol ... Calls for "crippling" sanctions
on Iran by Obama and Brown are certainly not the most productive policy
options available to these two world leaders. Both have indicated a
desire to strengthen the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. Iran's
action, in declaring the existence of the Qom facility, has created a
window of opportunity for doing just that, and should be fully
exploited within the framework of IAEA negotiations and inspections,
and not more bluster and threats form the leaders of the western world."</p><p><br />Former National Security Council staffers Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, writing in the New York Times, agree that sanctions would be counterproductive, but call for<a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/249596/toolbar"> intervention from the Obama Administration and international community</a> that curbs weapons development and serves Iran's needs: </p><p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">"the
administration should seek a strategic realignment with Iran as
thoroughgoing as that effected by Nixon with China. This would require
Washington to take steps, up front, to assure Tehran that rapprochement
would serve Iran’s strategic needs. </p><p class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">On that basis, America and
Iran would forge a comprehensive framework for security as well as
economic cooperation — something that Washington has never allowed the
five-plus-one group to propose. Within that framework, the
international community would work with Iran to develop its civil nuclear program, including fuel cycle activities on Iranian soil, in a transparent manner rather
than demanding that Tehran prove a negative — that it’s not developing
weapons. A cooperative approach would not demonize Iran for political
relationships with Hamas and Hezbollah, but would elicit Tehran’s commitment to work toward peaceful resolutions of regional conflicts" </p><p><br />Tell us which of these <em>Sparring Opinions </em>you find most insightful -- and add your reviews to these two stories:<br /><br />• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/245359/toolbar">Keeping Iran honest</a> - <em>The Guardian</em></p><p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/249596/toolbar">How to press the advantage with Iran</a> - <em>New York Times<br /><br /></em></p><p>-- Derek Hawkins</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Our New Toolbar: A Visual Guide</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/toolbar.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/toolbar.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e889a3970c</id>
        <published>2009-09-23T12:15:57-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-23T16:05:59-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Last week we launched a new version of our website, and you've probably noticed a lot of changes and improvements. Among the many new features we've created to make your NewsTrust experience better is the NewsTrust Toolbar. Our Toolbar makes...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="home page" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="newstrust" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="review form" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="toolbar" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Last week we launched a new version of our website, and you've probably noticed a lot of <a href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/check-our-new-site.html">changes and improvements</a>. Among the many new features we've created to make your NewsTrust experience better is the NewsTrust Toolbar. Our Toolbar makes reviewing and posting stories easier than ever. <br /><br /><strong>The NewsTrust Toolbar At a Glance</strong><br />Here's a quick overview of how to use our new toolbar. </p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e939a6970c-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="-1" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a592abc5970b image-full " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592abc5970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px;" title="-1" /></a></p><br /> <div>Next time you use our toolbar, try clicking on all these buttons to get the most of this new feature. </div><div><br />Here's a quick step-by-step walk-through on how to review a story with our new toolbar.<strong><br /><br />Reviewing a Story</strong><br />To review a story on the new NewsTrust site, click on the story's title or on its yellow or gray "Review" button, just like before. </div><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e876b8970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p> <p><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e877ab970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p> <p><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5920a1b970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p> <p><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5923b64970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592e8c6970b-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="Clickstory" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a592e8c6970b image-full " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592e8c6970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px; width: 438px; height: 147px;" title="Clickstory" /></a>
</p> <p><br />Clicking either of these links will take you to the story's original page; the NewsTrust Toolbar will display at the top, with the review form on the right hand side. </p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e89649970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5923bd7970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592ea3c970b-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="Toolbarreview" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a592ea3c970b " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592ea3c970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px; width: 447px; height: 267px;" title="Toolbarreview" /></a></p><p class="asset asset-image"><br />
</p> 
 
 <p>Read and review the story. If the review form is blocking part of the story's text, click the "Close" link  in the bottom left, or click "Review" at the top. The Toolbar will remain at the top of the screen. To reopen the review form, click "Review" again. </p><p class="asset asset-image">To close the Toolbar and only show the story on its original page, click the blue "X" in the top-right corner. <br /><br />When you're finished your review, click the yellow "Save" button at the bottom of the review form. Once you do this, you can edit the story's info, share your review with a friend, or see all NewsTrust member reviews for the story. To go back to the NewsTrust home page, click the NewsTrust logo in the top-left corner in the Toolbar. </p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5920bdc970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e8caad970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592eb06970b-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="Toolbardone" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a592eb06970b " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a592eb06970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px;" title="Toolbardone" /></a>
</p> <br />
 
 <p><strong>Posting a Story<br /></strong>To post a new story on NewsTrust<strong> </strong>using the Toolbar, copy the URL of the story you want to post, then click the yellow "Post a Story" link in the top-right corner of the NewsTrust home page. Paste the URL into the box that drops down. </p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5920265970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e89833970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5923d0c970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e97857970c-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="Post" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e97857970c image-full " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e97857970c-800wi" style="margin: 0px; width: 478px; height: 193px;" title="Post" /></a>
</p> <br />
 
 <p class="asset asset-image">The story you've chosen will open automatically, with the NewsTrust Toolbar at the top and the story edit form on the right. </p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e8998d970c-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5923d74970b-pi" style="display: block;" /></p><p class="asset asset-image"><a href="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e978ae970c-pi" style="display: block;"><img alt="Toolbaredit" border="0" class="at-xid-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e978ae970c " src="http://florin.typepad.com/.a/6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e978ae970c-800wi" style="margin: 0px;" title="Toolbaredit" /></a>
</p> <br />
 
 <p>Some of the story's info will be entered automatically -- check to make sure it's right, and add anything that's missing (author's name, topics, content type). When you're finished, click "Save" -- then give it a review! For an alternative way to post stories to NewsTrust, check our handy <a href="http://newstrust.net/tools/bookmarklet">bookmarklet tool</a>. For more info on how to review a story check our <a href="http://newstrust.net/guides/how-to-review">News Literacy Guide</a>.</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Sparring Opinions: Climate Change</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/sparring-climate.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://blog.newstrust.net/2009/09/sparring-climate.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d834861f6869e20120a5e4500d970c</id>
        <published>2009-09-22T12:36:10-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-22T12:36:10-07:00</updated>
        <summary>World leaders met today at the United Nations summit to begin developing international policy on curbing emissions and preventing irreversible climate change. In today's Sparring Opinions we're comparing two op-eds that offer different views on whether the global economy is...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Derek Hawkins</name>
        </author>
        
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="carbon emissions" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="climate change" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="g20" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="global economy" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="global warming" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="greenhouse gas" />
        <category scheme="http://sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" term="united nations" />
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://blog.newstrust.net/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>World leaders met today at the United Nations summit to begin developing international policy on curbing emissions and preventing irreversible climate change. In today's <em>Sparring Opinions </em>we're comparing two op-eds that offer different views on whether the global economy is prepared to make large-scale changes to attain this goal.<br /><br />British Prime Minister Gordon Brown penned an opinion in <em>Newsweek</em>, arguing that the international community must <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/229494/toolbar" target="_blank">reach a consensus by the end of the year</a>, when leaders gather in Copenhagen to develop a formal plan. "If we miss this opportunity, there will be no second chance sometime in the future," he says, adding:<br /></p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">"Some argue that, amid demanding economic conditions, our resolve to
meet environmental commitments should weaken, that the costs are too
high. In fact, the opposite is true; a strong agreement in Copenhagen
is essential for global economic recovery. For that recovery depends on
the investment that an agreement will unleash. The economies that
embrace the green revolution earliest will reap the greatest rewards."<br /></div><p><br />Overhauling our current energy consumption will take <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/229490/toolbar" target="_blank">too great a toll on world economies to be worthwhile in the short-term</a>, writes Stephen F. Hayward, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, in the Wall Street Journal:<br /></p><div class="blockquote" style="margin-left: 40px;">"the idea that we must act now to avoid bigger costs down the road just
doesn't hold water. Simply put, the world of tomorrow will be
considerably richer than today—and much better able to absorb the costs
of climate change. Yale University's William Nordhaus, one of the top
climate economists, thinks it is sound to allow about half or more of
the prospective damage from climate change to simply occur—since the
world 40 or 60 years from now will be in a much better situation to
handle the economic effects."<br /></div><p><br />Which of these op-eds do you find most insightful? Make your voice heard -- add your review to these two stories: </p><p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/229494/toolbar">Copenhagen or bust</a> - <em>Newsweek</em></p><p>• <a href="http://newstrust.net/stories/229490/toolbar">Alternatives are simply too expensive</a> - <em>Wall Street Journal</em><br /><br />-- Derek Hawkins</p></div>
</content>


    </entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:from_kauri -->
