<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8CQHo7fyp7ImA9WhZQFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385</id><updated>2011-04-21T21:14:21.407-04:00</updated><title>NexGenLaw Blog</title><subtitle type="html">General news and information about The Anderson Law Firm, Tampa, Florida, and the next generation legal services that we provide</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>10</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Nexgenlaw" /><feedburner:info uri="nexgenlaw" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>Nexgenlaw</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk4GQXw_fyp7ImA9WxdaF0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-8890112895678326797</id><published>2008-08-26T11:05:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-26T17:08:40.247-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-26T17:08:40.247-04:00</app:edited><title>Tampa Tribune Quotes Anderson in Article About Relationship Between Lowry Park Zoo and Safari Wild</title><summary type="html">A  Tampa Tribune article published last  Saturday raised questions about the activities of the executive director  for Tampa's Lowry Park Zoo in connection with his for-profit venture,  Safari Wild.  According to the article, "Lowry Park Zoo is a nonprofit  organization that has been funded with millions of dollars in taxpayer money.  Safari Wild is a fledgling, for-profit business owned by [the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/LKzhDZrg6vg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/8890112895678326797?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/8890112895678326797?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/LKzhDZrg6vg/tampa-tribune-quotes-anderson-in.html" title="Tampa Tribune Quotes Anderson in Article About Relationship Between Lowry Park Zoo and Safari Wild" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/08/tampa-tribune-quotes-anderson-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0ADQnk-fyp7ImA9WxdaGE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-8324758323716394729</id><published>2008-08-25T12:01:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-27T05:36:13.757-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-27T05:36:13.757-04:00</app:edited><title>Who Woulda Thunk It: Experts May Be Biased?</title><summary type="html">The following is an article published today by Fastcase entitled: “Hot Tubbing” Steams Up the Courtroom." It points out that our adversarial system has its advantages, but the so-called "battle of the experts" is not one of them - at least not from the perspective of judges and juries. Perhaps it is time for us to consider a process by which we permit experts to arrive at a general consensus, &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/0IgNcQzoee4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/8324758323716394729?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/8324758323716394729?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/0IgNcQzoee4/who-woulda-thunk-it-experts-may-be_25.html" title="Who Woulda Thunk It: Experts May Be Biased?" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/08/who-woulda-thunk-it-experts-may-be_25.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cEQn4yfip7ImA9WxdaEkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-1612979391728760785</id><published>2008-08-20T10:02:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-08-20T10:03:23.096-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-08-20T10:03:23.096-04:00</app:edited><title>11th Circuit Says Car Rental Companies Cannot Be Held Liable for Negligent Acts of Renters</title><summary type="html">The 11th Circuit  Court of Appeals (the federal appellate court governing appeals in Florida)  ruled yesterday that recently enacted federal legislation known as "the Graves  Amendment" (49 U.S.C. § 30106) preempts state tort claims against car  rental companies under a theory of vicarious liability.  In English, what  the Court said was that the statute passed by Congress, and signed into law  &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/q72ef_pNDoQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/1612979391728760785?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/1612979391728760785?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/q72ef_pNDoQ/11th-circuit-says-car-rental-companies.html" title="11th Circuit Says Car Rental Companies Cannot Be Held Liable for Negligent Acts of Renters" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/08/11th-circuit-says-car-rental-companies.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUEMRHY4fCp7ImA9WxdVGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-2198611359400789406</id><published>2008-07-24T09:58:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-24T09:54:45.834-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-24T09:54:45.834-04:00</app:edited><title>11th Circuit Rules On Florida Pledge of Allegiance Case: Students Must Recite Pledge But May Remain Seated</title><summary type="html">The  Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling yesterday in which it  held that a portion of a Florida statute requiring students to participate in  the pledge of allegiance is unconstitutional, but that the remainder of the  statute may be enforced.  Many people would be surprised to learn that  Florida even has such a statute.  It is known as  "Florida’s Pledge of Allegiance" statute, &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/SMD9y3LldDg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/2198611359400789406?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/2198611359400789406?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/SMD9y3LldDg/11th-circuit-rules-on-florida-pledge-of_24.html" title="11th Circuit Rules On Florida Pledge of Allegiance Case: Students Must Recite Pledge But May Remain Seated" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/11th-circuit-rules-on-florida-pledge-of_24.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkcDRHc_eyp7ImA9WxdVE0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-4693801212331759004</id><published>2008-07-18T10:03:00.002-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-18T10:07:55.943-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-18T10:07:55.943-04:00</app:edited><title>Times They Are A Changin'</title><summary type="html">The American Bar Association reported today in two separate articles that a group of lawyers is starting a "virtual law firm," while law firm giant Holland &amp;amp; Knight is now offering discounted fees coupled with "success fees" if the firm wins their cases. The "virtual law firm" will employ lawyers who work at home, saving on overhead and costing clients less in legal fees. According to the firm &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/XvwmFgYF4Ak" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/4693801212331759004?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/4693801212331759004?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/XvwmFgYF4Ak/times-they-are-changin.html" title="Times They Are A Changin'" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/times-they-are-changin.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4ER388eCp7ImA9WxdWF00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-2670269293125335163</id><published>2008-07-10T10:24:00.001-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-10T10:41:46.170-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-10T10:41:46.170-04:00</app:edited><title>Something We Can Agree On: Passage of Medicare Improvement Act Is "Good Medicine" for Everyone</title><summary type="html">Last night, the United States Senate approved the Medicare Improvement Act for Patients and Providers (H.R. 6331) by a vote of 69 to 30.  In an important demonstration of bipartisan support for the measure, 18 Republican Senators joined with Democratic Senators in voting to approve the legislation.  The House of Representatives had previously approved the legislation by a vote of 355 to 59.  The &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/OF8-3DUlcZ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/2670269293125335163?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/2670269293125335163?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/OF8-3DUlcZ0/something-we-can-agree-on-passage-of.html" title="Something We Can Agree On: Passage of Medicare Improvement Act Is &quot;Good Medicine&quot; for Everyone" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/something-we-can-agree-on-passage-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0QNSHo4fCp7ImA9WxdWFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-1992717657129139195</id><published>2008-07-07T10:02:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-07T10:03:19.434-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-07T10:03:19.434-04:00</app:edited><title>New Filing Fees: The Cost of Justice Just Went Up</title><summary type="html">Effective July 1, 2008, new court filing fees went into effect in Florida state courts that make filing a claim, including a counterclaim or cross-claim, substantially more expensive in certain cases. Most notably, the filing fee for county court evictions increased from $80 to $270, a 238% increase. Additionally, there was previously no fee assessed for filing a counterclaim or cross-claim, but &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/jobB5_M1c2A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/1992717657129139195?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/1992717657129139195?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/jobB5_M1c2A/new-filing-fees-cost-of-justice-just.html" title="New Filing Fees: The Cost of Justice Just Went Up" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/new-filing-fees-cost-of-justice-just.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEIGRX0ycSp7ImA9WxdWE0g.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-6962893554372511742</id><published>2008-07-06T09:58:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-07-06T09:55:24.399-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-07-06T09:55:24.399-04:00</app:edited><title>Lawyers Should Take Note of Comments On Winters &amp; Yonker Case</title><summary type="html"> The local news media has  recently given a great deal of coverage to a case involving two lawyers, Bill  Winters &amp;amp; Marc Yonker, and their former employer, Richard Mulholland.  One article, published in the  St. Petersburg Times last week, provided a detailed account of the allegations  of “theft, sex and deceit,” at issue in the case.&amp;lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns =  "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/2WnhK6hNUVM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/6962893554372511742?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/6962893554372511742?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/2WnhK6hNUVM/lawyers-should-take-note-of-comments-on.html" title="Lawyers Should Take Note of Comments On Winters &amp; Yonker Case" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/07/lawyers-should-take-note-of-comments-on.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DU4ARnsycCp7ImA9WxdXFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-4088704650193936910</id><published>2008-06-27T18:43:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-28T06:12:27.598-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-28T06:12:27.598-04:00</app:edited><title>The Truth On Trial</title><summary type="html">Lately a certain law firm that shall remain nameless has been running virtually nonstop radio ads which appear to be directed toward scaring people into choosing that law firm because it impliedly has the "financial resources" and "trial experience" that others do not. The ads do not mention that, contrary to a popular myth that can easily be exploited to obtain clients, the reality is that most &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/T9JMX6JlyjE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/4088704650193936910?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/4088704650193936910?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/T9JMX6JlyjE/re-truth-on-trial.html" title="The Truth On Trial" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/re-truth-on-trial.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cAQXY7fCp7ImA9WxdXFU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7341895186906280385.post-3244563013035317550</id><published>2008-06-26T15:23:00.004-04:00</published><updated>2008-06-26T15:37:20.804-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2008-06-26T15:37:20.804-04:00</app:edited><title>Florida Aviation Trades Association Selects The Anderson Law Firm as General Counsel</title><summary type="html">The Anderson Law Firm announced today that it has been selected by the Florida Aviation Trades Association (FATA) to act as FATA General Counsel. The FATA is an aviation trade group that has been actively promoting and protecting the rights, interests and development of Florida’s aviation industry since 1946. Attorney Daniel Anderson said that the firm is honored to be selected by such a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~4/4ui7KUu_BNA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/3244563013035317550?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7341895186906280385/posts/default/3244563013035317550?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Nexgenlaw/~3/4ui7KUu_BNA/florida-aviation-trades-association.html" title="Florida Aviation Trades Association Selects The Anderson Law Firm as General Counsel" /><author><name>nexgenlaw</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07708803311932156887</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><feedburner:origLink>http://nexgenlaw.blogspot.com/2008/06/florida-aviation-trades-association.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

