<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Nielsen Wire » Media + Entertainment</title>
	
	<link>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire</link>
	<description>Consumer Insights, News, Research &amp; Reports</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment" /><feedburner:info uri="nielsenwiremediaentertainment" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Vintage PC Video Games Still Thrive in World of Apps</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/R-WVOEcN30o/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/vintage-pc-video-games-still-thrive-in-world-of-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 20:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PC games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video games]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=32089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even before the Internet and the rapid growth and increased access to free video gaming in a web browser, PC owners in the U.S. played games locally right on their desktop. Bundled in with the operating system, games like FreeCell, Solitaire, Minesweeper, Hearts, and Pinball served as the original free-to-play games.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even before the Internet and the rapid growth and increased access to free video gaming in a web browser, PC owners in the U.S. played games locally right on their desktop.  Bundled in with the operating system, games like FreeCell, Solitaire, Minesweeper, Hearts, and Pinball served as the original free-to-play games.  Even today, these games maintain a sizable audience &#8211; impressive in a world that offers many other avenues to free video gaming on PCs and mobile devices.</p>
<p>PC gaming data from Nielsen’s U.S. metering of home and work panelists provides insights on executable file gameplay, or “.exe’s”, that are launched and played from the desktop.  A look at the last six months’ worth of 2011 metered data for the top five pre-installed game titles revealed the following insights.</p>
<ul>
<li>The total combined average monthly audience (July-Dec 2011) for these titles was 20.3MM</li>
<li>Overall, 58% of metered gameplay came from females</li>
<li>Overall, 88% of metered gameplay came from ‘gamers’ aged 25+</li>
<li>Pinball and Minesweeper were the only games that showed more than a marginal audience under 25, with 31% and 24% of gameplay, respectively, coming from this younger age range</li>
<li>FreeCell had the largest average monthly audience over the timespan, with close to 9.4MM unique players each month (Solitaire was 2nd with an average monthly audience of 7MM)</li>
<li>FreeCell, Solitaire and Hearts resonated highest with the 55+ crowd, with over 50% of players for these three games being part of this older demographic<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-32091" title="Game-Play-Graphic" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Game-Play-Graphic.png" alt="Game-Play-Graphic" width="398" height="382" /></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gameplay-by-age.gif"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-32112" title="gameplay-by-age" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gameplay-by-age.gif" alt="gameplay-by-age" width="575" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>Another interesting dynamic is the amount of time spent and frequency for playing these pre-installed games:</p>
<ul>
<li>The card-based games of FreeCell, Solitaire and Hearts had the highest levels of average minutes of weekly play, with over 150 minutes each for FreeCell and Solitaire and just over 70 for Hearts</li>
<li>FreeCell and Solitaire averaged seven sessions each per week, while Hearts was closer to six</li>
<li>Taking into account the average audiences for these three card-based games, and factoring in the time spent playing, over 44 million hours of combined monthly play can be attributed to them</li>
<li>Pinball and Minesweeper both exhibited lower average weekly play in terms of minutes, 26 and 38 respectively, as well as sessions, two and three respectively.</li>
</ul>
<p>As new tech and devices emerge, it’s easy to assume that older versions of games, or just old games in general, would fall out of favor.  However, old habits die hard, and familiarity with programs and games can have a lot to do with the long tail of gameplay.  This particular data for pre-installed games skews heavily towards an older demographic, which presents an opportunity for developers/publishers to perhaps find ways to make their free-to-play games as easily accessible and bundled in as possible for this audience.  And for advertisers that want to reach this large demographic, it&#8217;s an opportunity to work with device manufacturers and operating system publishers to reach this mass audience if/when these pre-installed games tie-in connectivity or become server-based as the norm. An important question remains though &#8211; how do you convert or transition these gamers to other versions of these same games or change their habits in how they access them on newer, or more social formats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/vintage-pc-video-games-still-thrive-in-world-of-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/vintage-pc-video-games-still-thrive-in-world-of-apps/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Local TV Preferred Method of Advertisment Among Presidential Candidates</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/k5fd0ihiynU/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/local-tv-preferred-method-of-advertisment-among-presidential-candidates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local tv advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=32042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the first quarter of 2012, campaigns for the five leading U.S. presidential candidates—Newt Gingrich, Barack Obama, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum—placed nearly 66,000 advertisements across local broadcast and print, according to Nielsen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the first quarter of 2012, campaigns for the five leading U.S. presidential candidates—Newt Gingrich, Barack Obama, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum—placed nearly 66,000 advertisements on local broadcast media, according to Nielsen. Mitt Romney&#8217;s camp placed over half of those ad units (57%), while the other Republican candidates made up nearly a third of all units placed (32%) with President Obama&#8217;s ads accounting for the remaining 11 percent.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, spot TV was the top choice among all candidates for reaching potential voters, representing nearly 75 percent of all ad units, followed by local/regional cable networks. Rick Santorum&#8217;s campaign showed the greatest balance between the two mediums, placing 59 percent of ads on local TV stations and 34 percent on regional cable networks.  President Obama&#8217;s team leaned more towards spot TV and placed over 80 percent of ads on those stations.  Ads for Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney saw the largest share of local radio placements among the candidates, 13 percent and 12 percent of total campaign advertisements, respectively.</p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Share of Campaign Ad Units by Media Type</caption>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Candidate</th>
<th> Spot TV</th>
<th> Local/Regional Cable</th>
<th> Spot Radio*</th>
<th> Total Ad Units^</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Newt Gingrich</td>
<td>78.8%</td>
<td>8.1%</td>
<td>13.1%</td>
<td>5,978</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Barack Obama</td>
<td>83.2%</td>
<td>15.9%</td>
<td>0.9%</td>
<td>7,388</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Ron Paul</td>
<td>76.2%</td>
<td>22.0%</td>
<td>1.8%</td>
<td>5,601</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Mitt Romney</td>
<td>75.1%</td>
<td>13.1%</td>
<td>11.8%</td>
<td>37,581</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Rick Santorum</td>
<td>59.1%</td>
<td>34.2%</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
<td>9,231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">*Source: Media Monitors Inc.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="5">^Ad units on Spot TV, Local/Regional Cable, Spot Radio and Local Newspapers</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>When looking at ad placements by market, the most targeted was Greenville-Spartanburg-Asheville-Anderson (4,021 advertisements among the five candidates), which spans counties in Georgia, South Carolina and battleground state North Carolina.  Rounding out the top five were Florida markets Miami and Tampa, followed by Columbia, SC and Orlando. <!-- start chart --></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Top 10 Most-Targeted Markets*</caption>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Market</th>
<th> Total Q1 2012 Ad Units</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Greenville-Spartanburg-Asheville-Anderson (SC and NC)</td>
<td>4,021</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Miami-Ft. Lauderdale (FL)</td>
<td>3,781</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Tampa-St. Pete Beach (FL)</td>
<td>3,237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Columbia (SC)</td>
<td>3,025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Orlando-Daytona Beach-Melbourne (FL)</td>
<td>3,011</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Charleston (SC)</td>
<td>2,638</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Jacksonville (FL)</td>
<td>2,539</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Myrtle Beach-Florence (SC)</td>
<td>2,538</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce (FL)</td>
<td>2,448</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Detroit (MI)</td>
<td>2,337</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="2">*Among ad units placed by Newt Gingrich, Barack Obama, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Other findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Seattle was the only market targeted      by all five candidates during Q1 2012.</li>
<li>Although Newt Gingrich was the winner of the South Carolina primary, his campaign placed the      fewest total ad units among the candidates in highly targeted markets Charleston and Columbia.</li>
<li>The top markets for spot TV placements for Team Obama included North  Carolina and Wisconsin, Team Romney focused on several Florida markets and Teams Gingrich, Paul and Santorum advertised heavily on local stations in South Carolina.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/local-tv-preferred-method-of-advertisment-among-presidential-candidates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/local-tv-preferred-method-of-advertisment-among-presidential-candidates/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Basement? Garage? American Teens Will Watch, and Play, Just About Anywhere</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/QGvEG5WtHV4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/basement-garage-american-teens-will-watch-and-play-just-about-anywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to television, the 12-17 demo is proving that times may change, but teens will be teens, spending nearly the same amount of time viewing TV in bedrooms as they do in family rooms. Overall, teenagers spent 47% of their TV time in their bedrooms versus 48% in family rooms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the 18-34 year old demographic juggernaut may be known for their hunger for connectivity—from online video  to social networking—their younger counterparts have an appetite for consumption of a different nature: Gaming. According to Nielsen, 12-17 year olds represent an outsized share of game console usage, more than triple that of their share of TV or DVR usage.</p>
<p>The 12-17 demo is proving that they are also game, quite literally, for watching or playing just about anywhere in the home—including basements and garages. More than half (52%) of their time spent with a gaming console happens in either non-traditional spaces or bedrooms while 48 percent is spent gaming in more social environs, such as a living or family room.</p>
<p>When it comes to television, the 12-17 demo is proving that times may change, but teens will be teens, spending nearly the same amount of time viewing TV in bedrooms as they do in family rooms. Overall, teenagers spent 47 percent of their total TV viewing in their bedrooms versus 48 percent in family rooms.</p>
<p>In contrast, the 35-64 demo spends 62 percent of their total TV in a shared space and only 31 percent of their time in the bedroom. Those 65 and older spend the largest chunk of their viewing time (69%) in a family or living room.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31935" title="Nielsen_Time Spent Using TV by Location" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Nielsen_Time-Spent-Using-TV-by-Location1.png" alt="Nielsen_Time Spent Using TV by Location" width="556" height="434" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/basement-garage-american-teens-will-watch-and-play-just-about-anywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/basement-garage-american-teens-will-watch-and-play-just-about-anywhere/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Global Report: Multi-Screen Media Usage</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/WIlpqGN8h-g/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-report-multi-screen-media-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform media measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Online Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television viewing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Nielsen’s global survey of multi-screen media usage, watching video content on computers has become just as common as watching video content on television among online consumers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nielsen’s <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/global-online-consumers-and-multi-screen-media-today-and-tomorr.html">global survey of multi-screen media usage</a>, watching video content on computers has become just as common as watching video content on television among online consumers. More than 80 percent of Internet respondents in 56 countries reported watching video content at home on a computer (84%) or on TV (83%) at least once a month. By contrast, in 2010, more online consumers reported watching video content on TV (90%) than on a computer (86%) in a month-long period.</p>
<p>While the in-home TV and computer are still the most popular devices to watch video content, usage and growth in online and mobile technologies is making a sustained impact. Three-quarters (74%) of global respondents report watching video via the Internet (on any device), up four points since 2010, and over half of global online consumers (56%) say they watch video on a mobile phone at least once a month and 28 percent at least once a day.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/global-multi-screen.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31886" title="global-multi-screen" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/global-multi-screen.png" alt="global-multi-screen" width="566" height="694" /></a></p>
<p>Mobile video is particularly prominent in Asia-Pacific and Middle East/African regions, where 74 and 72 percent of online consumers, respectively, report watching video on mobile phones at least once a month, and almost 40 percent (38% and 37%, respectively) say they do so at least once a day. While mobile video is currently less prominent in North America than in other parts of the world, it is seeing the highest growth rates in mobile phone video consumption. Thirty-eight percent of North American respondents say they watch mobile video once a month, up eight points compared to the 2010 reported results.</p>
<p>“The convenience of mobile connectivity has revolutionized how people are engaging with digital content and each other around the world,” said Dounia Turrill, SVP, Client Insights, Nielsen. “With the growth of smartphones, mobile video consumption is on the rise for entertainment content, particularly in emerging markets where many consumers leapfrog home Internet altogether in favor of the all-in-one smartphone.”</p>
<p>For more, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/global-online-consumers-and-multi-screen-media-today-and-tomorr.html">Global Online Consumers and Multi-Screen Media: Today and Tomorrow</a></p>
<p><strong>About the report<br />
</strong> The Nielsen Global Survey of Multi-Screen Media Usage was conducted in August/September 2011 and polled more than 28,000 consumers in 56 countries throughout Asia-Pacific, Europe, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and North America. The sample has quotas based on age and sex for each country based on their Internet users, and is weighted to be representative of Internet consumers and has a maximum margin of error of ±0.6%. This Nielsen survey is based on the behavior of respondents with online access only. Internet penetration rates vary by country. Nielsen uses a minimum reporting standard of 60 percent Internet penetration or 10M online population for survey inclusion. The Nielsen Global Survey was established in 2005.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-report-multi-screen-media-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/global/global-report-multi-screen-media-usage/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>For U.S. Consumers, Different Stores Mean Different Smartphone Shopping Behavior</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/u_DYhJ0Rkvc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-u-s-consumers-different-stores-mean-different-smartphone-shopping-behavior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nielsen Wire</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital couponing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent Nielsen survey of U.S. smartphone owners who report using their mobile phones while shopping in a store, indicates that consumers use their phones differently depending on the type of store. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent Nielsen survey of U.S. smartphone owners who report using their mobile phones while shopping in a store, indicates that consumers use their phones differently depending on the type of store. For example, mobile couponing (either using or requesting a coupon) is most popular at grocery stores (41 percent of mobile shoppers reported using coupons there), department stores (41%), and clothing stores (39%).  The more considered the purchase, the more smartphone shoppers rely on their smartphones: At electronics stores, the vast majority of smartphone shoppers read reviews (73%), compare prices with other retail outlets (71%) and scan QR codes to get more product details (57%).</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/smartphone-by-store.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31838" title="smartphone-by-store" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/smartphone-by-store.png" alt="smartphone-by-store" width="558" height="514" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-u-s-consumers-different-stores-mean-different-smartphone-shopping-behavior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/for-u-s-consumers-different-stores-mean-different-smartphone-shopping-behavior/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Winning Vision: Nielsen Reveals Data Viz Contest Judge’s Choice Award Winner and Fan Favorite Contestants</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/Lx9uxpSV-50/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/winning-vision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 17:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>matth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data visualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, we challenged information design enthusiasts of all experience levels to use Nielsen data and create compelling visual stories and insights as part of the Nielsen Data Visualization Contest. We’re pleased to announce the winner of the Judge’s Choice Award is Dustin Poh, a student at Montclair State University.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, we challenged information design enthusiasts of all experience levels to use Nielsen data and create compelling visual stories and insights as part of the<a href="http://nielsen.com/dataviz2012"> Nielsen Data Visualization Contest</a>. We’re pleased to announce the winner of the Judge’s Choice Award is Dustin Poh, a student at Montclair State University.</p>
<p>Now, Nielsen is calling on data visualization enthusiasts from around the world to <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/dataviz2012">cast their vote</a> for the Fan Favorite award.</p>
<p>A panel of Nielsen Data Visualization Contest judges scored the entries for innovation and beauty in design and accuracy of interpretation, and has narrowed the field down to a select group of finalists for the Fan Favorite portion of the contest.</p>
<p>“There was great diversity in the interpretation of the data. Some people told a story, some made the data interactive, and others focused on intriguing visuals,” said Ana Mackay-Sim, Nielsen’s Global Creative Director.</p>
<div id="attachment_31813" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 580px"><a href="http://www.nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/campaigns/dataviz/nielsen-dataviz-dustin-poh.pdf"><img class="size-full wp-image-31813" title="Dustin Poh" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/dataviz-image.jpg" alt="Click to View Full Size" width="570" height="483" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">(Click image to view full size PDF)</p></div>
<p>Dustin Poh is currently completing his degree in graphic design, after serving in the U.S. Air Force for four years. He decided to enter the contest to help build his portfolio as he prepares for a career in marketing and design. For him the contest was “a good opportunity to work with real-world data” while building out his portfolio.</p>
<p>“Before I joined the military, design was always something I wanted to do,” Dustin said “I always had an interest, and college has given me the skills.”</p>
<p>When deciding how to tell the story for his entry, Dustin said it “depends on your audience demographic and your content. I spent so many hours reading over it, trying to connect the dots between stories.”</p>
<p>He started his design by looking at the data, mapping out his ideas, bullet-pointing key statistics to include in his story and ultimately deciding an infographic as his presentation medium because “infographics tend to be more content driven.”</p>
<p>As the winner of the Nielsen Data Visualization Contest Judge’s Choice, Dustin will receive $2,000 in American Express Rewards cards and other prizes. The Fan Favorite winner will receive a similar prize package, so be sure to cast your vote here! Public voting will remain open through May 21, 2012 at 5pm ET, so please <a href="http://nielsen.com/dataviz2012">visit the contest page</a> and vote for your favorites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/winning-vision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/media_entertainment/winning-vision/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: TV Continues to Hold the Lion’s Share of Ad Dollars and Consumers’ Media Time</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/ycsB8lJWaOQ/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-tv-continues-to-hold-the-lion%e2%80%99s-share-of-ad-dollars-and-consumers-media-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising spend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television Audience Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. television ad spend was up 4.5 percent in 2011, according to the third and final part of Nielsen’s Advertising &#038; Audiences Report. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. television ad spend was up 4.5 percent in  2011, according to the third and final part of Nielsen’s  Advertising &amp; Audiences Report.  The report took an in-depth look at media  consumption by platform and found that American advertisers and consumers have a  huge appetite for television, as TV holds the lion’s share of ad dollars and  consumers’ media time. Ad spend for TV reach $72 billion, more than all other ad platforms  combined.</p>
<p>Other  findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Spending on cable TV  has increased steadily over the last few years, up 42 percent from  2007.</li>
<li>The  average TV commercial in 2011 was 28.4 seconds.</li>
<li>Spanish-language  cable and network TV saw double digit growth in ad spend, up 24 percent and 16  percent, respectively, from 2010.</li>
<li>Automotive was the largest category for  advertising spend across all media, with $10.2 billion spent by automotive  brands in 2011, more than twice as much as the second-largest  category—quick-service restaurants.</li>
<li>AT&amp;T and Verizon were the top TV  spenders during 2011 for brands AT&amp;T Wireless Web Access ($1.1 billion) and  Verizon Wireless Web Access ($702.2 million).</li>
</ul>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31779" title="AudiencesAdvertising_MediaSpend" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/AudiencesAdvertising_MediaSpend.gif" alt="AudiencesAdvertising_MediaSpend" width="452" height="605" /></p>
<p>Download all three installments of Nielsen’s State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Report:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Nielsen-Adv-Aud-by-MediaType-Spring-2012.pdf">State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Part 3: By Media Type</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/nielsen-advertising-audiences-report-spring-2012.pdf">State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Part 2: By Demographic</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/nielsen-advertising-and-audiences-spring-2012.pdf">State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Part 1: Primetime by Genre</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-tv-continues-to-hold-the-lion%e2%80%99s-share-of-ad-dollars-and-consumers-media-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-tv-continues-to-hold-the-lion%e2%80%99s-share-of-ad-dollars-and-consumers-media-time/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-Platform Report: How We Watch From Screen to Screen</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/kSzhGl7KfOA/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/cross-platform-report-how-we-watch-from-screen-to-screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 16:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nielsen Cross-Platform Report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consumers are shifting to new technologies and devices that make it easier for them to watch the video they want, whenever and wherever they want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average American watches nearly five hours of video each day, 98 percent of which they watch on a traditional TV set, <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/the-cross-platform-report-q4-2011.html">according to the Nielsen Cross-Platform Report</a>, released today. Although this ratio is less than it was just a few years ago, and continues to change, the fact remains that Americans are not turning off. They are shifting to new technologies and devices that make it easier for them to watch the video they want, whenever and wherever they want.</p>
<p><strong>TV is Still the Center of Viewing</strong><br />
In the past year, the number of homes with an HDTV grew by more than 8 million to 80.2 million, leaving little doubt that the TV screen remains the dominant platform on which to consume video content. But the means by which the content is delivered appear to be shifting.</p>
<p>Traditional—live and timeshifted—TV viewing remains the primary role of the TV, accounting for more than 33 hours per week despite a decline one half of one percent in time spent compared to Q4 2010. To fill the gap, consumers are finding new ways to use their TVs.</p>
<p><strong>Game Consoles Now in Nearly Half of TV Homes<br />
</strong>Consoles have become strategically positioned as a secondary gateway to TV content, and can now be found in 45 percent of TV homes, an increase of three percent over last year. With Netflix and other streaming apps, Blu-ray players, social gaming and point of purchase seamlessly integrated into game consoles, it is no surprise that consumers are relying on their consoles to perform double (and triple) duty. These new activities are adding up and contributing to the growth of content consumption. Interestingly, households without children are leading the way in new game console adoption, demonstrating that game consoles are appealing to a range of audiences for a variety of purposes.</p>
<p><strong>Mobile Viewership Small but Growing<br />
</strong>With improving screens, Internet connectivity and the advantage of being “the best screen available” while on the go, smartphones are increasingly becoming portable TVs. In fact, 33.5 million mobile phone owners now watch video on their phones—an increase of 35.7 percent since last year. While mobile phones won’t replace other screens anytime soon, they are part of the ever-increasing number of ways in which consumers consume content.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/viewing-in-review.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31730" title="viewing-in-review" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/viewing-in-review.png" alt="viewing-in-review" width="570" height="716" /></a>For more information and insights, <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/the-cross-platform-report-q4-2011.html">download Nielsen&#8217;s latest Cross-Platform Report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/cross-platform-report-how-we-watch-from-screen-to-screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/cross-platform-report-how-we-watch-from-screen-to-screen/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: U.S. Media Trends by Demographic</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/2hqjwsmRW5M/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-u-s-media-trends-by-demographic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reports + Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simultaneous viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two of Nielsen’s State of the Media: Advertising &#038; Audiences Report presents an in-depth look at usage by demographic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Millenials to Boomers, males to females, and a variety of racial/ethnic groups, <a href="http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/nielsen-advertising-audiences-report-spring-2012.pdf">part two</a> of Nielsen’s State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Report presents an in-depth look at usage by demographic.  According to Nielsen, white TV viewers use their DVR twice as much as any other group on a daily basis, yet Asians watch the most timeshifted content as a share of overall TV time.  Among popular online destinations for TV content &#8211; Hulu, Netflix and YouTube &#8211; Hispanics were most likely to watch video on Netflix, while Asians were most likely to watch on Hulu and black viewers on YouTube.</p>
<p>Other findings include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Teens used a game console for eight minutes a night, on average, during primetime &#8211; more than twice as much as the general TV population.</li>
<li>When watching TV and using their tablet simultaneously, male tablet users were more likely to look up information related to a TV program while females were more likely to up look info related to a TV ad.</li>
<li>Females spend 61.2 percent of their timeshifted viewing during primetime watching Dramas.</li>
<li>Online adults aged 25-54 are 23 percent more likely than the average U.S. Internet user to follow a brand via social networking and 29 percent more likely to purchase a product online that was featured on TV.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/prime-time-device.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31704" title="prime-time-device" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/prime-time-device.jpg" alt="prime-time-device" width="576" height="504" /></a></p>
<table class="rankings" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<caption>Simultaneous TV and Tablet Usage (Q4 2011)</caption>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th> Activities while watching TV</th>
<th> General Population*</th>
<th> P13-17</th>
<th> P18-34</th>
<th> P35-54</th>
<th> P55+</th>
<th> Males</th>
<th> Females</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Checked email site during the program</td>
<td>61%</td>
<td>52%</td>
<td>58%</td>
<td>65%</td>
<td>65%</td>
<td>58%</td>
<td>64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Checking sport score</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>36%</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>32%</td>
<td>44%</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Looked up coupons or deals related to an advertisement I saw on TV</td>
<td>22%</td>
<td>22%</td>
<td>29%</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>14%</td>
<td>21%</td>
<td>24%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Looked up information related to the TV program I was watching</td>
<td>37%</td>
<td>37%</td>
<td>36%</td>
<td>38%</td>
<td>34%</td>
<td>39%</td>
<td>34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Looked up product information for an advertisement I saw on TV</td>
<td>27%</td>
<td>29%</td>
<td>28%</td>
<td>27%</td>
<td>22%</td>
<td>25%</td>
<td>28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Visited a Social Networking site during the program</td>
<td>47%</td>
<td>62%</td>
<td>50%</td>
<td>47%</td>
<td>33%</td>
<td>44%</td>
<td>50%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="axis">Visited a Social Networking site during a commercial break</td>
<td>45%</td>
<td>52%</td>
<td>52%</td>
<td>44%</td>
<td>32%</td>
<td>43%</td>
<td>48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="8">Source: Nielsen</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="table_meta" colspan="8">*Tablet users aged 13+</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- end chart --></p>
<p>Download Nielsen’s <a href="http://nielsen.com/content/dam/corporate/us/en/reports-downloads/2012-Reports/nielsen-advertising-audiences-report-spring-2012.pdf">State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Part 2: By Demographic</a>.</p>
<p>Download <a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/nielsen-advertising-and-audiences-spring-2012.pdf">State of the Media: Advertising &amp; Audiences Part 1: Primetime by Genre</a>.</p>
<p><em>Primetime is defined as Monday–Saturday 8pm to 11pm and Sunday 7pm to 11pm.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-u-s-media-trends-by-demographic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/report-u-s-media-trends-by-demographic/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Hispanics in U.S. Highly Active on Mobile and Social</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NielsenWireMediaEntertainment/~3/kKPLOf8DFyA/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/hispanics-in-u-s-highly-active-on-mobile-and-social/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>alana</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media + Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online + Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=31565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hispanic consumers’ usage rates of smartphones, television, online video, social networking and other forms of entertainment make them one of today’s most engaged and dynamic targets in the digital space, according to Nielsen’s recent State of the Hispanic Consumer: The Hispanic Market Imperative report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the U.S., Hispanic consumers’ usage rates of smartphones, television, online video, social networking and other forms of entertainment make this group one of today’s most engaged and dynamic populations in the digital space, according to <a href="../consumer/young-mobile-and-growing-the-state-of-us-hispanic-consumers/">Nielsen’s recent State of the Hispanic Consumer: The Hispanic Market Imperative report</a>.  Mobile presents a significant avenue of opportunity for marketers looking to reach Hispanic consumers – Hispanic mobile users send or receive 941 SMS (text) messages a month, more than any other ethnic group.  They also make 13 phone calls per day, 40 percent more than the average U.S. mobile user.</p>
<p>Social is another platform where Latinos are especially active and rising in numbers.  During February 2012, Hispanics increased their visits to Social Networks/Blogs by 14 percent compared to February 2011.  Not only are Latinos the fastest growing U.S. ethnic group on Facebook and WordPress.com from a year ago, but also Hispanic adults are 25 percent more likely to follow a brand and 18 percent more likely to follow a celebrity than the general online population.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-31619" title="Hispanics and Social_v3" src="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Hispanics-and-Social_v3.PNG" alt="Hispanics and Social_v3" width="575" height="854" /></p>
<p>Other digital findings from the report include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Hispanic video viewers are 68      percent more likely than  non-Hispanic White viewers to watch video on the      Internet, and 20  percent more likely to watch video on a mobile phone.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Hispanics outpace all ethnic      groups in mobile downloads of music and pictures.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Hispanics are less likely to      have Internet access at home compared to the U.S. average (62 % and 76%,      respectively), but have increased home broadband use by 14 percent over      the past year, which is higher than the 6 percent growth of broadband use      in the general market.</li>
</ul>
<p>For more information on Hispanic consumers, download <a href="http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/reports-downloads/2012/state-of-the-hispanic-consumer-the-hispanic-market-imperative.html">Nielsen’s State of the Hispanic Consumer: The Hispanic Market Imperative report</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/hispanics-in-u-s-highly-active-on-mobile-and-social/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/hispanics-in-u-s-highly-active-on-mobile-and-social/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.616 seconds. --><!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-27 20:26:52 --><!-- Compression = gzip -->

