<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for No Runny Eggs</title>
	
	<link>http://norunnyeggs.com</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/NoRunnyEggsComments" /><feedburner:info uri="norunnyeggscomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Comment on GAO – Unfunded liabilities over the next 75 years – $41.1-$76.4 trillion by J. Houston</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/gao-unfunded-liabilities-over-the-next-75-years-41-1-76-4-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-38512</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Houston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8366#comment-38512</guid>
		<description>The current debate and near term passage of obama care continues to ignore this huge issue.  How can we expect to have leaders deal with this issue when they act as though they know nothing about it. Based upon their financial acumen it may well be true. But they have to be able to understand the concept and size of the issue to do the job one would think.

Does anyone estimate the unfunded liabilities from a proposal like the reconcilation health care bill or does the detail needed not exist at this point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The current debate and near term passage of obama care continues to ignore this huge issue.  How can we expect to have leaders deal with this issue when they act as though they know nothing about it. Based upon their financial acumen it may well be true. But they have to be able to understand the concept and size of the issue to do the job one would think.</p>
<p>Does anyone estimate the unfunded liabilities from a proposal like the reconcilation health care bill or does the detail needed not exist at this point?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/4lkp4HkDVZo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on They Put One of Yours in the Hospital… by Wyatt Earp</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/they-put-one-of-yours-in-the-hospital/comment-page-1/#comment-38510</link>
		<dc:creator>Wyatt Earp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8476#comment-38510</guid>
		<description>I love Tom Coburn.  Absolutely love him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Tom Coburn.  Absolutely love him.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/Gp2q_O3zMjQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wednesday HOT read – Field v. Clark by Limbaugh channels No Runny Eggs… « DaTechguy's Blog</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/wednesday-hot-read-field-v-clark/comment-page-1/#comment-38509</link>
		<dc:creator>Limbaugh channels No Runny Eggs… « DaTechguy's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8468#comment-38509</guid>
		<description>[...] finished reading Steve Eggleston’s post here concerning what constitutes when a bill passes and when not: Allow me to translate that for you – as of right now, the ONLY court-acceptable evidence that an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] finished reading Steve Eggleston&#8217;s post here concerning what constitutes when a bill passes and when not: Allow me to translate that for you – as of right now, the ONLY court-acceptable evidence that an [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/WhN-G0f0kic" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GAO – Unfunded liabilities over the next 75 years – $41.1-$76.4 trillion by steveegg</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/gao-unfunded-liabilities-over-the-next-75-years-41-1-76-4-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-38508</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8366#comment-38508</guid>
		<description>Point of order - I'll submit that a lot of the elected officials don't know about it.  I'll relate a story from my locale, Oak Creek, Wisconsin, a city of roughly 34,000.  A bit over a year ago, an actuarial study was undertaken on the long-term liability of the self-funded health insurance the city has, and the actuaries stated there was a $63 million unfunded liability.  Out of the 7 elected officials with the power to do anything about funding said liability, only two even knew the study existed, and the only one that had any concerns is now an ex-alderman.

The point that the $76.4T is in present-velue dollars is well-noted.  I specifically did not compare the total unfunded liabilities versus total GDP because it is misleading.  However, not all comparisons against GDP are misleading - the yearly comparisons are still quite valid, and frankly, quite frightening.

In fact, in terms of GDP, the CBO stopped calculating the publicly-held debt versus GDP once they predict it hits 200% GDP.  That is somewhere between 2032 and 2051.  That actually supports your calculation that the unfunded liability, in terms of today's dollars, is 30 times total federal revenues.

At the same time, not all of that has to be funded at once.  The bad news is exactly $0.00 is going to fund that.  The worse is the unfunded liability is growing at something north of 10% per year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point of order &#8211; I&#8217;ll submit that a lot of the elected officials don&#8217;t know about it.  I&#8217;ll relate a story from my locale, Oak Creek, Wisconsin, a city of roughly 34,000.  A bit over a year ago, an actuarial study was undertaken on the long-term liability of the self-funded health insurance the city has, and the actuaries stated there was a $63 million unfunded liability.  Out of the 7 elected officials with the power to do anything about funding said liability, only two even knew the study existed, and the only one that had any concerns is now an ex-alderman.</p>
<p>The point that the $76.4T is in present-velue dollars is well-noted.  I specifically did not compare the total unfunded liabilities versus total GDP because it is misleading.  However, not all comparisons against GDP are misleading &#8211; the yearly comparisons are still quite valid, and frankly, quite frightening.</p>
<p>In fact, in terms of GDP, the CBO stopped calculating the publicly-held debt versus GDP once they predict it hits 200% GDP.  That is somewhere between 2032 and 2051.  That actually supports your calculation that the unfunded liability, in terms of today&#8217;s dollars, is 30 times total federal revenues.</p>
<p>At the same time, not all of that has to be funded at once.  The bad news is exactly $0.00 is going to fund that.  The worse is the unfunded liability is growing at something north of 10% per year.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/pb9dzVPbm6Y" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GAO – Unfunded liabilities over the next 75 years – $41.1-$76.4 trillion by Gregg Prentice</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/gao-unfunded-liabilities-over-the-next-75-years-41-1-76-4-trillion/comment-page-1/#comment-38507</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Prentice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8366#comment-38507</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for blogging on this topic. There are way to few that even know about it. And, even though ALL our elected officials know about it, they behave as if it doesn’t exist: Their current Healthcare proposal = Case Closed.

One point though about your post: Things are MUCH worse than your “$1 trillion deficit every year for the next 75 years” implies, because the GAO’s $76.4T is PRESENT VALUE. i.e. all 75 years of deficits DISCOUNTED to today equals the $76.4T.

Also, comparing our unfunded liabilities against GDP is extremely misleading, as no one can personalize their personal devastation. Try this instead:

$76.4T is conservatively 30 times the size of the federal revenues of $2.5T. Federal revenues are primarily funded by annual social security and income taxes. So then, how is every taxpayers portion of the unfunded liabilities not 30 times what they pay annually in social security and income taxes? Due TODAY! 30x!?!? 

The majority of the unfunded liabilities are Medicare, and we’re supposed to be weak-kneed at the current healthcare proposal that doesn’t even spit at the problem.

Would someone help raise the bar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for blogging on this topic. There are way to few that even know about it. And, even though ALL our elected officials know about it, they behave as if it doesn’t exist: Their current Healthcare proposal = Case Closed.</p>
<p>One point though about your post: Things are MUCH worse than your “$1 trillion deficit every year for the next 75 years” implies, because the GAO’s $76.4T is PRESENT VALUE. i.e. all 75 years of deficits DISCOUNTED to today equals the $76.4T.</p>
<p>Also, comparing our unfunded liabilities against GDP is extremely misleading, as no one can personalize their personal devastation. Try this instead:</p>
<p>$76.4T is conservatively 30 times the size of the federal revenues of $2.5T. Federal revenues are primarily funded by annual social security and income taxes. So then, how is every taxpayers portion of the unfunded liabilities not 30 times what they pay annually in social security and income taxes? Due TODAY! 30x!?!? </p>
<p>The majority of the unfunded liabilities are Medicare, and we’re supposed to be weak-kneed at the current healthcare proposal that doesn’t even spit at the problem.</p>
<p>Would someone help raise the bar?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/iWfYvpJhZBo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling The Plug by J. Strupp</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/pulling-the-plug/comment-page-1/#comment-38505</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Strupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8461#comment-38505</guid>
		<description>Yeah exactly my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah exactly my point.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/Wz--gxa0nBY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread Thursday – DemonPass edition by The ObamaCare Lay Away Plan | The Lonely Conservative</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/open-thread-thursday-demonpass-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-38502</link>
		<dc:creator>The ObamaCare Lay Away Plan | The Lonely Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8470#comment-38502</guid>
		<description>[...] looks like they’re set to vote on Sunday. Bloody Sunday.Where will they send the bill with the President in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looks like they&#8217;re set to vote on Sunday. Bloody Sunday.Where will they send the bill with the President in [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/rm8D4AJlkRA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Thread Thursday – DemonPass edition by M.E.</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/open-thread-thursday-demonpass-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-38501</link>
		<dc:creator>M.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8470#comment-38501</guid>
		<description>Congrats on the Hot Air link!  I guess that's an Instalance by proxy, seeing as Glenn just linked to Hot Air.

Is the word verification ALWAYS wtf ??  Because that sure is appropriate, given the subject of Demonpass etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the Hot Air link!  I guess that&#8217;s an Instalance by proxy, seeing as Glenn just linked to Hot Air.</p>
<p>Is the word verification ALWAYS wtf ??  Because that sure is appropriate, given the subject of Demonpass etc.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/-xFeI-cSf3w" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling The Plug by Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/pulling-the-plug/comment-page-1/#comment-38500</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8461#comment-38500</guid>
		<description>"Life goes on, the sun will rise in the east tomorrow morning and in the long run we're all dead"

Yup, I'm pretty sure the same thing was said by the Captain of the Titanic as he ignorantly attempted to chastise the crew member who reported "Uh, sir, we have a leak"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Life goes on, the sun will rise in the east tomorrow morning and in the long run we&#8217;re all dead&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, I&#8217;m pretty sure the same thing was said by the Captain of the Titanic as he ignorantly attempted to chastise the crew member who reported &#8220;Uh, sir, we have a leak&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/swMLFQv0uUE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling The Plug by J. Strupp</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/pulling-the-plug/comment-page-1/#comment-38499</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Strupp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8461#comment-38499</guid>
		<description>You definately have a knack for over-dramatization.  

Life goes on, the sun will rise in the east tommorrow morning and in the long run we're all dead.

Believe it or not, we'll all survive this rather small blip in American history and live to see another day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You definately have a knack for over-dramatization.  </p>
<p>Life goes on, the sun will rise in the east tommorrow morning and in the long run we&#8217;re all dead.</p>
<p>Believe it or not, we&#8217;ll all survive this rather small blip in American history and live to see another day.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/RMRzVGOblig" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wednesday HOT read – Field v. Clark by dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/wednesday-hot-read-field-v-clark/comment-page-1/#comment-38498</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8468#comment-38498</guid>
		<description>Buy.  More.  Ammo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buy.  More.  Ammo.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/swk0BVz8R1U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Roll bloat – DemonPass edition by Sissy Willis</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/roll-bloat-demonpass-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-38497</link>
		<dc:creator>Sissy Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8466#comment-38497</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words and links.

Am adding you to my blogroll too.

Now get back out there and fight the good fight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words and links.</p>
<p>Am adding you to my blogroll too.</p>
<p>Now get back out there and fight the good fight!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/IBWPYQRXufY" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pulling The Plug by Chris from Racine</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/pulling-the-plug/comment-page-1/#comment-38496</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris from Racine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8461#comment-38496</guid>
		<description>First - great to see you posting again - good luck in your new position.

Second - EXCELLENT analogy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First &#8211; great to see you posting again &#8211; good luck in your new position.</p>
<p>Second &#8211; EXCELLENT analogy!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/GqYCNosrimo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s tourney time, baby! by Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/its-tourney-time-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-38495</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8459#comment-38495</guid>
		<description>It's obvious, it's Kansas....Go Cats! (did I sound like a native?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s obvious, it&#8217;s Kansas&#8230;.Go Cats! (did I sound like a native?)</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/edaoa1zBzmw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on It’s tourney time, baby! by Paul - Berry Laker</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/its-tourney-time-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-38494</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul - Berry Laker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8459#comment-38494</guid>
		<description>Did Obama pick Arkansas-Pine Bluff to win it all? Didn't he pick the winners in Mass, NJ and wasn't it Virgina? 

Good luck to all on your brackets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Obama pick Arkansas-Pine Bluff to win it all? Didn&#8217;t he pick the winners in Mass, NJ and wasn&#8217;t it Virgina? </p>
<p>Good luck to all on your brackets.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/2-MuyS6CcZU" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give them an inch, they’ll take you a mile by steveegg</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/give-them-an-inch-theyll-take-you-a-mile/comment-page-1/#comment-38493</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8455#comment-38493</guid>
		<description>That is always implied around these parts.

Now, can I afford some .50 BMG?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is always implied around these parts.</p>
<p>Now, can I afford some .50 BMG?</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/ObJ6NFA0PWQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Give them an inch, they’ll take you a mile by dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/give-them-an-inch-theyll-take-you-a-mile/comment-page-1/#comment-38492</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8455#comment-38492</guid>
		<description>Au contraire, Steve-O!

Here's what remains to be said:

BUY MORE AMMO!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Au contraire, Steve-O!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what remains to be said:</p>
<p>BUY MORE AMMO!!!</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/gEAj3mRKJrI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wednesday Hot Read – Warner Todd Huston’s “Illinois Shows Limitations of Tea Party Movement” by steveegg</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/wednesday-hot-read-warner-todd-hustons-illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-38491</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8125#comment-38491</guid>
		<description>I tend to take the Grover Norquist view of that - outside RINOs and perhaps "Christian" Socialists (not to be confused with the Christian right), we tend to actually be rather harmonious.  Most of that coalition realize that the best way to the goals of each of the individual blocs is for a small, unintrusive government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to take the Grover Norquist view of that &#8211; outside RINOs and perhaps &#8220;Christian&#8221; Socialists (not to be confused with the Christian right), we tend to actually be rather harmonious.  Most of that coalition realize that the best way to the goals of each of the individual blocs is for a small, unintrusive government.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/lamvQsMO6vw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wednesday Hot Read – Warner Todd Huston’s “Illinois Shows Limitations of Tea Party Movement” by Zerk</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/wednesday-hot-read-warner-todd-hustons-illinois-shows-limitations-of-tea-party-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-38490</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8125#comment-38490</guid>
		<description>Frankly as disorganized as the Demos coalition of bloc interests is,
how disorganized would a coalition of the 'christian right' 'liberterian less taxes/Govt' 'independent tea partiers' 'trandional conservative repubs' and of course 'Rinos" be?
If this Ocare passes and unemployment stays above the 'reported' figure of 9% November should be interesting to say the least.  As you know, the chinese invoke 'interesting times' as a curse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly as disorganized as the Demos coalition of bloc interests is,<br />
how disorganized would a coalition of the &#8216;christian right&#8217; &#8216;liberterian less taxes/Govt&#8217; &#8216;independent tea partiers&#8217; &#8216;trandional conservative repubs&#8217; and of course &#8216;Rinos&#8221; be?<br />
If this Ocare passes and unemployment stays above the &#8216;reported&#8217; figure of 9% November should be interesting to say the least.  As you know, the chinese invoke &#8216;interesting times&#8217; as a curse.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/aLzJACWtLoo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sean Duffy endorsed by the 7th District Republican caucus by RIchard Kackley</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/sean-duffy-endorsed-by-the-7th-district-republican-caucus/comment-page-1/#comment-38489</link>
		<dc:creator>RIchard Kackley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8382#comment-38489</guid>
		<description>Hey Ed,

Are you threatening people? You suggest Sean be careful?  Well, let's see, I suggest you not worry so much about the endorsement.  If it means nothing,then you and your boy Mielke have nothing to worry about.  The only one who decides if Mielke will be on the ballot is Mielke. But you don't care about that.  Your whole schtick is to spread lies and false information. I have been to your facebook page.  You claim to hold real American Ideals, but yet you are guilty of the same tactics the Obama Administration is guilty of.  Its too ba, you seem like someone that the Republicans could use to get Obey defeated.  Too bad you drank too much kool-aid.  

If you want to respond, tell me how the endorsement infringes on anyone's right to vote?  If Mielke gets enough signatures, he will be on the ballot.  So what is your beef?  Oh yes, I keep forgetting the obviousness of your supporting Mielke and not being an objective voter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed,</p>
<p>Are you threatening people? You suggest Sean be careful?  Well, let&#8217;s see, I suggest you not worry so much about the endorsement.  If it means nothing,then you and your boy Mielke have nothing to worry about.  The only one who decides if Mielke will be on the ballot is Mielke. But you don&#8217;t care about that.  Your whole schtick is to spread lies and false information. I have been to your facebook page.  You claim to hold real American Ideals, but yet you are guilty of the same tactics the Obama Administration is guilty of.  Its too ba, you seem like someone that the Republicans could use to get Obey defeated.  Too bad you drank too much kool-aid.  </p>
<p>If you want to respond, tell me how the endorsement infringes on anyone&#8217;s right to vote?  If Mielke gets enough signatures, he will be on the ballot.  So what is your beef?  Oh yes, I keep forgetting the obviousness of your supporting Mielke and not being an objective voter.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/uoDu4KUQS_4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would the “lockbox” have worked? by Zerk</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/would-the-lockbox-have-worked/comment-page-1/#comment-38488</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8444#comment-38488</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your time in delving into the devils details.  The uninformed but common sense citizens have known since the previous crisis in SS, that it is a Ponzi scheme destined to fail upon the retirement of the baby-boom generation.  Guess what? Common sense was right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your time in delving into the devils details.  The uninformed but common sense citizens have known since the previous crisis in SS, that it is a Ponzi scheme destined to fail upon the retirement of the baby-boom generation.  Guess what? Common sense was right.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/Gt8h0fSH7Lk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Associated Press starts to catch up on the Social Security Crater by steveegg</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/the-associated-press-starts-to-catch-up-on-the-social-security-crater/comment-page-1/#comment-38482</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8440#comment-38482</guid>
		<description>Actually, you are a racist.  It's what happens when big-S Socialists get in power, be they white, black, yellow, green, purple, polka-dotted, gray, blue, or whatever color.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you are a racist.  It&#8217;s what happens when big-S Socialists get in power, be they white, black, yellow, green, purple, polka-dotted, gray, blue, or whatever color.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/fk0FPyVcXec" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Associated Press starts to catch up on the Social Security Crater by Ilpalazzo</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/the-associated-press-starts-to-catch-up-on-the-social-security-crater/comment-page-1/#comment-38481</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilpalazzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8440#comment-38481</guid>
		<description>That's what happens when a white woman marries a black man! Oh, I'm a racist bigot! Oooh! Actually, just a misanthrope tellin it like it is after years of observing the human race..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what happens when a white woman marries a black man! Oh, I&#8217;m a racist bigot! Oooh! Actually, just a misanthrope tellin it like it is after years of observing the human race..</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/stDcJT56sk4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Associated Press starts to catch up on the Social Security Crater by steveegg</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/the-associated-press-starts-to-catch-up-on-the-social-security-crater/comment-page-1/#comment-38480</link>
		<dc:creator>steveegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:25:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8440#comment-38480</guid>
		<description>Point noted on what the "Trust Funds" represent.  The only difference between them and publicly-held debt is ownership for a few years.

Sending the excess to individuals for investment might have worked, but somehow I doubt that's what Al Gore had in mind for the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point noted on what the &#8220;Trust Funds&#8221; represent.  The only difference between them and publicly-held debt is ownership for a few years.</p>
<p>Sending the excess to individuals for investment might have worked, but somehow I doubt that&#8217;s what Al Gore had in mind for the money.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/-vZliA6Z4Y0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Would the “lockbox” have worked? by No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Associated Press starts to catch up on the Social Security Crater</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/03/would-the-lockbox-have-worked/comment-page-1/#comment-38479</link>
		<dc:creator>No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The Associated Press starts to catch up on the Social Security Crater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8444#comment-38479</guid>
		<description>[...] Glenn Reynolds wanted to know what happened to the “lockbox”, I decided to take a somewhat-quick back-of-the-spreadsheet look at what would have happened had a &amp;#...      [Comments (13)]  [link]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Glenn Reynolds wanted to know what happened to the &#8220;lockbox&#8221;, I decided to take a somewhat-quick back-of-the-spreadsheet look at what would have happened had a &amp;#&#8230;      [Comments (13)]&nbsp; [link]&nbsp; [...]</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/NoRunnyEggsComments/~4/Q7isakVYXOs" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
