Newly published research utilizing historical solar magnetic field phase analysis documents the impact of solar activity on Earth’s temperature.

Cold “Little Ice Age” periods can be reliably linked to Grand Solar Minima (GSM).

For example, during the Maunder Minimum (late 1600s to early 1700s), solar irradiance is thought to have declined by about 3 W/m², and consequently the Northern Hemisphere cooled by approximately 1°C.

Using pattern analysis, it may be assumed that the onset of the next GSM has arrived, and global cooling will be realized over the next few decades.

“During a GSM a reduction of solar irradiance is expected by about 3 W/m² from the modern level that causes a decrease of the average terrestrial temperature by about 1.0C.”

“In summary, it can be concluded that the modern grand solar minimum (2020-2053) predicted 10 years ago by Zharkova et al, 2015 has arrived and will progress as expected until the mid of century. There is the cold weather with huge frosts and snows recorded in January- February 2026 in the whole Northern hemisphere from the West to the East and from the North to the equator. The little ice age associated with the modern grand solar minimum is here…”

Image Source: Zharkova, 2026

Germany’s online WELT (published mid-May 2026) outlines a major health and climate policy demand made by a “high-level expert commission” to the World Health Organization (WHO).

Symbol image generated by Grok AI

According to WELT, a pan-European expert commission on health and sustainable development, appointed by the WHO and chaired by former Icelandic Prime Minister Katrín Jakobsdóttir, is urging the WHO to declare the climate crisis a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern.” This is the WHO’s highest level of alert, which was previously triggered during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Climate change an acute “medical emergency?

In its report, the commission emphasizes that the climate crisis is no longer an abstract threat to future generations. Instead, it is an acute danger to global health, security, social cohesion, and human rights.

Former German Federal Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach (SPD socialists) is a member of this commission, and he strongly supports the proposal, calling climate change an acute “medical emergency.” He warned that climate change must be placed at the very top of the WHO’s agenda, arguing that waiting makes no sense given the severe health consequences, such as tens of thousands of heat-related deaths and the health impacts of fossil fuel combustion.

Phase out fossil fuels

The WHO report outlines concrete steps for action. Firstly, the WHO should establish a central “Climate Information Hub” to provide scientifically sound forecasts and fact-checks.

Secondly, national governments are urged to firmly anchor climate risks within their security and healthcare policies and to phase out subsidies for fossil fuels.

The steps also call on the WHO reviewing every two years how well individual countries are preparing their healthcare systems for climate change. Furthermore, medical staff should receive better training in sustainability and climate adaptation.

The timing of the report’s submission was strategically chosen to precede the annual World Health Assembly of the WHO in Geneva, aiming to initiate a debate on updating international health regulations.

Donate - choose an amount
5101520501002505001000

Real-world observations show both cooling and warming trends in the Arctic, Antarctic, and Tropical oceans since ARGO monitoring was introduced in 2004.

Real-world observations show no trend in global precipitation since 1979.

Real-world observations show global cloud cover decline since 1985. A decline in cloud albedo means more solar radiation can be absorbed by the surface. Thus, the decline in cloud cover can easily explain the warming of the last 40 years.

Image Source: Humlum, 2026

Germany’s No. 1 party – conservative AfD Party – calls for tangible consequences for politics, the media, and the judiciary after extreme emission scenario “RCP 8.5 is no longer scientifically serious and will no longer be used.

The Germany-based European Institute for Climate and Energy (EIKE) reports that on May 20, 2026, the AfD requested a topical debate (Aktuelle Stunde) in the Bundestag.

The background for the debate was the decision within the scientific IPCC/CMIP7 framework to no longer use the extreme emission scenario “RCP 8.5” (or SSP5-8.5) as a plausible worst-case scenario.

AfD climate spokesperson Karsten Hilse described the scenario as an implausible “horror scenario” and “the greatest fraud in human history”, arguing that it had been used for years to generate panic and justify expensive climate measures, and had even influenced the Federal Constitutional Court’s draconian 2021 climate ruling.

The other political parties (Union, SPD, Greens, Left) rejected the criticism. They argued that the extreme scenario had become unrealistic precisely because of the success of climate protection and renewable energies! Therefore, the AfD Party (the true conservatives) in Germany there is no need to change policy, especially since other scenarios with significant warming (up to approximately 3–3.5 °C) remain in place.

EIKE, however, vehemently contradicts the reasoning of the mainstream parties. Citing data from the Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy 2025, EIKE argues that the global contribution of wind (1.5%) and solar (1.3%) to the primary energy demand in 2024 totaled just around 2.8%.

CO2 emissions have not slowed globally

EIKE views the success of renewables as a sham argument, claiming instead that deindustrialization is the true cause of altered emission trends.

Media coverage following the debate was very restrained, limited, and largely following standard patterns of political polarization. The topic did not trigger a major wave of media attention.

The new video highlights a study from Rutgers University published in Nature Geoscience.

Researchers found that the rapid global warming phase at the end of the last ice age (around 18,000 years ago) coincided with the release of highly saline water—a “salt blob”—that had previously been trapped in the deep ocean.

Scientists have long suspected a link between deep ocean salinity and atmospheric CO2 levels during ice age cycles. Colder water holds more dissolved CO2. When marine organisms die, their carbon-rich remains sink into the deep sea. Variations in salinity act as a barrier, trapping this carbon in the deep ocean layers and preventing it from easily escaping back into the atmosphere.

Ocean currents and shifting layers can transport these deep, carbon-rich waters back to the surface. Once there, they oxidize and release large amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere, rapidly triggering a warming phase.

The Asymptotic Nature of Greenhouse Gases

The video notes that climate alarmists might equate this prehistoric CO2 release to modern industrial emissions. However, it argues this is oversimplified, asserting that greenhouse gases (like CO2 and methane) absorb radiation asymptotically—meaning their warming effect peaks at a certain limit rather than increasing indefinitely.

Historical Context (“Snowball Earth”)

It touches on the “Snowball Earth” phenomenon from 580 million years ago, when low atmospheric CO2 levels likely caused a super ice age.

The video concludes that because Earth’s current CO2 levels are historically low compared to the last half-billion years, even a slight drop can trigger cooling phases, whereas sudden releases of trapped ocean gases can quickly reverse this and instigate warm periods.

Watch the entire video (in German) on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NIx28vEstQ.

“Around 14.0-13.9 cal kyr BP, a short-lived year-round, ice-free, open ocean occurred.”

During the Early to Middle Holocene (10,000 to 4,000 years ago), Arctic sea ice was seasonal, dominated by first-year ice that did not survive the summer melt season.

“The Holocene Yermak Plateau is characterized by a seasonal sea ice cover, which my consist mainly of first-year sea ice … a large part of first-year ice, as opposed to seasonally drifted multi-year ice.”

Today, at 430 ppm CO2, Arctic sea ice is increasingly first-year, but a “multi-year environment” persists. Multi-year sea ice has survived at least one summer melt season, and it continues to thicken over multiple years.

The current phase is similar to the sea ice conditions that predominated ~16,000 years ago, or during the last glacial.

“…a marginal sea ice cover ca. 16 cal kyr BP [characterized by] first-year sea ice in a multi-year sea ice environment, a setting not unlike today.”

If the Arctic can be sea ice-free year-round when CO2 is 230 ppm, but dominated by multi-year ice when the CO2 concentration is 430 ppm, this does not support the alarmist claims that high CO2 concentrations are responsible for enhanced Arctic sea ice melt.

Image Source: Mayers et al., 2026

In recent years, media and political commentary has been dominated by a seemingly relentless cascade of doomsday scenarios. Anyone following the news got the impression that humanity was on the brink of an ecological collapse. Yet, an unexpected U-turn has just emerged —one that is, however, largely being met with a wall of silence in the mainstream media:

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has quietly walked back its most extreme projections.

The End of the 5-Degree Catastrophe

Under the leadership of renowned scientists such as Professor Detlef van Vuuren, 44 officials from the World Climate Council have conceded that previous scenarios predicting a global temperature rise of up to 5°C by the year 2100 are simply implausible.

These drastic model calculations, which for years were sold as indisputable scientific facts, have proven to be entirely untenable.

The paradox here is that while this correction should actually offer a sensational sense of relief to the global community, a telling silence prevails across German politics and the press. They fear losing the painstakingly established narrative of an impending apocalypse.

Political consequences 

The real scandal, however, lies not in the scientific miscalculation itself, but in the far-reaching political consequences drawn from it. Based on these now-discarded horror scenarios, a profound transformation of the economy and society was set in motion:

1. The introduction of the CO2 tax and the ban on internal combustion engines strip the country’s key industry of its foundation, jeopardizing hundreds of thousands of jobs.
2. The premature shutdown of coal-fired power plants has driven electricity and heating costs sky-high, severely undermining Germany’s international competitiveness.
3. Whether it is excessive home insulation that leads to mold growth, the visual destruction of natural landscapes by “wind turbine deserts,” or the legal approval of powdered insects in food—no area of life remains untouched by climate-policy paternalism.

The role of the judiciary is particularly explosive in this context. The Federal Constitutional Court explicitly based its landmark 2021 climate ruling on the very IPCC reports that have now been exposed as exaggerated. Experts like the former Hamburg Environmental Senator, Fritz Vahrenholt, pointed out the methodical flaws in these projections early on, but were defamed in public discourse as “climate deniers.”

Global megalomania vs. realpolitik

While Germany and parts of Europe plunge headlong into an ever-accelerating vortex of climate neutrality, a glance at the global stage reveals the fundamental futility of this national solo run. Germany is responsible for a mere 1.2% of global CO2 emissions. In stark contrast, the industrial giant China accounts for over 30% of global emissions and—much like India or South America—would not dream of sacrificing its own economic growth for Western climate targets.

Conclusion: time for a return to common sense

The perpetuation of climate panic today is to serve as an instrument of power for an burgeoning bureaucracy and a business model for profiteers cashing in on public fear.

Abandoning this ideological dead end would not only pave the way for a new economic miracle, but also restore personal freedom and self-determination to citizens. It is time to turn our attention back to the real problems of the world instead of chasing a ghost whose doomsday scenarios have been canceled by its own creators.

Donate - choose an amount
5101520501002505001000

Ms. Biggers, once a leading climate activist until recently, provides the details regarding why she changed her mind and views on current climate alarmism, discussing a progressive timeline between 2020 and 2025 where she deprogrammed herself from climate alarmism.

Schellenberger and Koonin

One of the major turning points came around 2020, when she began secretly reading books that directly challenged the apocalyptic climate narrative. Specifically, she cites Michael Shellenberger’s Apocalypse Never and Steve Koonin’s Unsettled, the latter of which opened her eyes to the idea that extreme weather patterns are not matching the catastrophic claims pushed by the media.

Glimpse at dystopia

Secondly, the 2020 lockdowns provided a massive wake-up call regarding what “Net Zero” measures actually look like in practice. She realized that despite the global economy completely shutting down and individuals losing their freedoms, global carbon emissions only dropped by about 5%. This made her question the authoritarian nature and feasibility of the movement’s goals.

Realization it’s a destructive mindset

Thirdly, having her first son in 2022 forced her to establish healthier emotional boundaries and take stock of her values. She realized she did not want to pass down a destructive mindset of existential dread and perpetual guilt for consuming resources in a modern world to her children.

What’s really driving the alarmists?

Lucy notes several overlapping psychological, social, and ideological reasons why activists adopt an alarmist mindset, explaining that within left-wing spaces, the prevailing narrative is that being Western, white, or privileged makes you inherently complicit in historical oppression. For many activists, the climate movement serves as a psychological mechanism to “atone for the sins of their birth” by fighting for oppressed or indigenous groups against “evil fossil fuel companies.”

Attention-seeking

Another factor is social pressure and the algorithmic fgeedback loop: Social media and workplace communication tools (like Slack) create an intense “groupthink” environment. Activists get hooked on a constant dopamine feedback loop of validation, moral superiority, and professional accolades when they post alarmist content.

I just started covering that as a 25-year-old… and all the videos that I made went really viral and so there was a feedback loop of I’m getting a lot of professional success from this and so I just made climate change my kind of whole personality and beat for my 20s…”

Conversely, pushing back causes severe social anxiety and the fear of being ostracized as an “enemy.”

Addiction to self-importance

Lucy highlights that the apocalyptic thinking has deep religious undertones, satisfying a modern craving for meaning and legacy. Activists become “addicted to the nihilism” and the intoxicating self-importance of believing they are saving the world from an end-times scenario.

…you get the nihilism, you get addicted to the nihilism, you get addicted to your your own sense of self-importance, you get addicted to the fact that you are right and other people are wrong and then the engagement you receive on social media—it’s a constant feedback loop.”

Biggers adds:

I remember anytime I used to get a critique when I was still in this groupthink, I would spiral… because my sense of self was built on sand. Like I truly was just constantly pinging the group to be like ‘What are my opinions, am I a good ally, am I a good ally, am I doing everything right to show that I’m like part of this movement?’ And it was so exhausting…”

Gore’s propaganda led to “existential dread”

According to Lucy Biggers, her intense anxiety and worry about the climate at an early age was triggered by watching the documentary film An Inconvenient Truth by Al Gore, explaining that she was a sophomore in high school (16 years old) in 2006 when her school played the film during a widespread high school assembly. Lucy describes the overwhelming psychological impact it had on her, which included existential dread and the feeling of having been handed a death sentence

Based on what she took away from the movie, she calculated a timeline for her own survival, stating, “I’m 16, I have till I’m 26… I have 10 years to live… I was racked by anxiety like in my nervous system”.

Watch full video here. 

Donate - choose an amount
5101520501002505001000

Overuse of already refuted climate models

Firstly, Fleischmann questions the reliability of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and the IPCC, accusing them of using “alarmist models” to influence political decisions, such as the German Federal Constitutional Court’s climate ruling [01:40].

Positive climate findings get buried

On the subject of “tipping points”, Dr. Fleischmann argues that the concept is statistically and historically refuted. He claims that original tipping points, like the greening of the Sahara (which he views as positive), were removed from updates because they weren’t “alarmist enough” [03:53].

Moreover, Fleichmann asserts that climate models are based on “ignorance,” citing the wide range of temperature predictions (1–6°C) as proof that scientists do not actually know the impact of CO2 [05:30].

CO2 is an overall benefit

On the subject of CO2, Fleischmann argues that CO2 has a marginal effect on temperature (maximum 1°C increase if doubled) and is primarily beneficial for plant growth, leading to a “greening” of the planet, especially in the Sahel zone [05:51], [25:15].

Change mainly driven by more powerful, natural factors

Fleischmann attributes recent warming not to greenhouse gases, but to changes in absorbed solar radiation (less reflection) and natural oceanic cycles like El Niño [09:58]. He points out that historical temperature data (from 1850) is unreliable because there were almost no measurement stations in the Southern Hemisphere or Africa at that time, making high-precision global temperature claims “propaganda” [19:02].

Wind farms causing far more damage than benefit

Fleischmann further argues that wind farms actually cause local warming and soil drying by disrupting air layers and preventing the ground from cooling at night [31:02]. He explains how infrasound from wind turbines can make people ill by affecting “piezo channels” in human cells and the brain [34:55]. He also claims they kill thousands of tons of insects and numerous birds/bats annually [40:43].

Mass wealth redistribution scheme

Citing PIK Director Ottmar Edenhofer, Fleischmann shows that climate policy is actually a tool for the redistribution of global wealth from the middle class to the “super-rich” [36:46], [39:02].

Concertning the media, he accuses them (ARD, ZDF, Süddeutsche Zeitung) of spreading lies and failing to report scientific facts that contradict the climate narrative [21:07], [27:46].

“No climate crisis”

In summary, Fleischmann concludes that there is no “climate crisis,” warming is generally better for humanity than cooling (citing fewer deaths from heat than cold), and the “energy transition” is a scientific and economic mistake [40:19].

Donate - choose an amount
5101520501002505001000

In the last 300 to 700 years, no precipitation pattern has emerged in Scandinavia, Asia, or Central Greece which can be linked to anthropogenic impacts or post-1950 CO2 increases (Stridbeck et al., 2026, Cai et al., 2026, Sakalis and Kastridis, 2025).

Extreme precipitation deficits (droughts) were much more common and pronounced across sub-Arctic Sweden and the Tibetan Plateau (TP) before 1950 than since.

For example, there were three TP megadroughts from 1865-1950, whereas only one occurred from 1950-2014 (Cai et al., 2026). TP severe drought years were worse in 1735 and 1914 than in 2009.

Image Source: Stridbeck et al., 2026

Image Source: Cai et al., 2026

Image Source: Sakalis and Kastridis, 2025