<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="0.92" xml:lang="en-US">
	<channel>
		<title>OLPC News Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Live information from OLPC News Forum]]></description>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OLPCNewsForum" /><feedburner:info uri="olpcnewsforum" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>OLPCNewsForum</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OLPC; current hardware and software state]]></title>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~3/ZyUkONxbs00/index.php</link>
			<description>Fascinating, thank you, kimtoufectis.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If an XO-3 is as durable as an XO-1, I&amp;#39;d get one &lt;img src="http://olpcnews.com/forum/Smileys/default/smiley.gif" alt="Smiley" border="0" /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~4/ZyUkONxbs00" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<category><![CDATA[XO MISC]]></category>
			<comments>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=5037.0</comments>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 19:02:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33685#msg33685</guid>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33685#msg33685</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OLPC; current hardware and software state]]></title>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~3/hAXmhu0fYb4/index.php</link>
			<description>&lt;div class="quoteheader"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33681#msg33681"&gt;Quote from: Dinky on May 12, 2012, 08:12:30 AM&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="quote"&gt;Is the second XO-1.75 keyboard (far right) the &amp;quot;high school&amp;quot; keyboard, i.e., not a membrane keyboard ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What makes the 1.75 keyboard assembly not compatible with the XO-1 ? &amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;[/quote...&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~4/hAXmhu0fYb4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<category><![CDATA[XO MISC]]></category>
			<comments>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=5037.0</comments>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 06:01:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33684#msg33684</guid>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33684#msg33684</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OLPC; current hardware and software state]]></title>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~3/vtQ-SDttNfg/index.php</link>
			<description>Since I&amp;#39;m lucky enough to have an XO 1.5 HS, I can respond to Dinky&amp;#39;s question:&amp;nbsp; while all the other versions (1.75, 1.5, and 1.0) share a membrane keyboard (the 1.75 with hard plastic between keys, the 1.0 and 1.5 without), the 1.5 HS has a more tradi...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~4/vtQ-SDttNfg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<category><![CDATA[XO MISC]]></category>
			<comments>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=5037.0</comments>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 05:38:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33683#msg33683</guid>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33683#msg33683</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OLPC; current hardware and software state]]></title>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~3/lYo4AgWfZSM/index.php</link>
			<description>Hey, this is good news.&amp;nbsp; Thank you.&amp;nbsp; If you have any other photos of the newest XO I&amp;#39;d love to see them.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any word if they might do another GiveOneGetOne?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~4/lYo4AgWfZSM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<category><![CDATA[XO MISC]]></category>
			<comments>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=5037.0</comments>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 02:54:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33682#msg33682</guid>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33682#msg33682</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: OLPC; current hardware and software state]]></title>
			<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~3/7mQ_Zc-HdZ8/index.php</link>
			<description>Is the second XO-1.75 keyboard (far right) the &amp;quot;high school&amp;quot; keyboard, i.e., not a membrane keyboard ?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What makes the 1.75 keyboard assembly not compatible with the XO-1 ? &amp;nbsp;The keyboard proper is physically different, but is the &amp;quot;upper base assembly&amp;quot; c...&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OLPCNewsForum/~4/7mQ_Zc-HdZ8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
			<category><![CDATA[XO MISC]]></category>
			<comments>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?action=post;topic=5037.0</comments>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 15:12:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<guid>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33681#msg33681</guid>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=5037.msg33681#msg33681</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

