<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0" xml:base="http://orangepolitics.org">
<channel>
 <title>OrangePolitics - Progressive perspectives on Orange County, NC.</title>
 <link>http://orangepolitics.org</link>
 <description>The purpose of this website is to encourage residents of Orange County, NC to get involved in their community by offering progressive perspectives on local and regional issues.
</description>
 <language>en</language>
<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OPfrontpage" /><feedburner:info uri="opfrontpage" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><geo:lat>35.912786</geo:lat><geo:long>-79.109318</geo:long><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>OPfrontpage</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
 <title>Municipal Election Filing Nears: Potential Candidates for Chapel Hill Town Council</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/M3NDy69pHfM/municipal-election-filing-nears-potential-candidates-for-chapel-hill-town-council</link>
 <description>&lt;div&gt;In a little over a month, on July 5, candidate filing will open at the Orange County Board of Elections for municipal elections and the Chapel Hill/Carrboro School Board. There hasn't been much media attention yet to potential candidates for any of these offices, but with &lt;a href="http://chapelboro.com/news/local-government/gary-kahn-announces-intention-to-run-for-town-council/" target="_blank"&gt;Gary Kahn announcing today&lt;/a&gt; his intention to run for Chapel Hill Town Council, it's certainly about that time when election speculation begins.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;With many discussions about the future of Chapel Hill -- particularly the future of economic development -- occurring simultaneously right now, who runs and who wins in November could have a significant impact on shaping the direction in which Chapel Hill grows. As such, let's take a look at who we might expect to see emerge as candidates for Town Council as the filing period nears.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/municipal-election-filing-nears-potential-candidates-for-chapel-hill-town-council"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/M3NDy69pHfM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/municipal-election-filing-nears-potential-candidates-for-chapel-hill-town-council#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/elections">Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issue/elections/2013">2013</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/chapel-hill-town-council">Chapel Hill Town Council</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tjcrayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7019 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/municipal-election-filing-nears-potential-candidates-for-chapel-hill-town-council</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Is Chapel Hill ready for a Public Engagement Advisory Board?</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/3fs-MeekEUM/is-chapel-hill-ready-for-a-public-engagement-advisory-board</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;With all the talk about &lt;a href="/2013/05/advisory-board-restructuring-two-information-sessions-this-week"&gt;restructuring Chapel Hill's advisory boards&lt;/a&gt;, I thought it might be good time to publicly share my idea for a new board to help foster better civic engagement and more open government, while also addressing the gap left by &lt;a href="/2006/04/chapel-hill-may-disband-two-boards"&gt;firing the technology advisory board 7 years ago&lt;/a&gt;. I shared this proposal with the Mayor's Committee on Communications



 in late 2010, but there didn't seem to be much interest at the time. 
Maybe now there is an opportunity to do something to make Chapel 
Hill more participatory and democratic. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-chapel-hill-ready-for-a-public-engagement-advisory-board"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/3fs-MeekEUM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-chapel-hill-ready-for-a-public-engagement-advisory-board#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government/the-democracy-problem">Democracy &amp;amp; Open Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/advisory-boards">advisory boards</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/civic-engagement">civic engagement</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/opengov">opengov</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 15:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ruby Sinreich</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7015 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-chapel-hill-ready-for-a-public-engagement-advisory-board</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Chapel Hill's Dwight Bassett makes the case for economic development</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/6wHiYXIDhu0/chapel-hills-dwight-bassett-makes-the-case-for-economic-development</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday at noon, Chapel Hill's Economic Development Officer 
Dwight Bassett provided a brief, one-hour presentation outlining some 
key facts and developments concerning retail, housing, and office space 
in Chapel Hill. The full presentation can be viewed &lt;a href="http://chapelhill.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=9&amp;amp;clip_id=1832" target="_blank"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I attended and live-tweeted the meeting. You can see the play-by-play below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/chapel-hills-dwight-bassett-makes-the-case-for-economic-development"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/6wHiYXIDhu0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/chapel-hills-dwight-bassett-makes-the-case-for-economic-development#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/economy-038-downtown">Economy &amp;amp; Downtown</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/ch2020">CH2020</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/design-2020">Design 2020</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/downtown">downtown</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/dwight-bassett">Dwight Bassett</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/economic-development">economic development</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/ephesus-church">Ephesus Church</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/housing">housing</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/retail">retail</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/rosemary-imagined">Rosemary Imagined</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 17:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>tjcrayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7013 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/chapel-hills-dwight-bassett-makes-the-case-for-economic-development</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Advisory Board Restructuring: Two Information Sessions This Week</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/nrAN1SImHho/advisory-board-restructuring-two-information-sessions-this-week</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Tonight
 is the first of two public information sessions regarding changes to 
Chapel Hill's advisory board structure. For the past several years, the 
Town of Chapel Hill has been in the process of reevaluating most of its 
operations. This includes changes in department organizational policies 
and procedures, employee compensation and classification, and Council 
guidelines for more efficient meetings. However, one area of the Town's 
operations that has not yet been restructured are its advisory boards. 
There has been a Council committee in place since 2010 (currently 
comprised of Council Members Gene Pease, Laurin Easthom, and Matt 
Czajkowski) to evaluate the advisory boards, and last Wednesday Council 
Member Pease presented their recommendations for board restructuring at a
 Council work session&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/advisory-board-restructuring-two-information-sessions-this-week"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/nrAN1SImHho" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/advisory-board-restructuring-two-information-sessions-this-week#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/planning-transportation">Planning &amp;amp; Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/advisory-boards">advisory boards</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/development-review">development review</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 11:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erin Crouse</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7012 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/advisory-board-restructuring-two-information-sessions-this-week</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Orange County to Discuss Strategic Library Plan Tuesday Night</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/E30ScpXGS-E/orange-county-to-discuss-strategic-library-plan-tuesday-night</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;At 7:00 pm on Tuesday night, at the Southern Orange Human Services center at 2501 Homestead Rd in Chapel Hill, the Orange County Comissioners will discuss the Orange County Public Library Draft Strategic Plan for 2013 - 2016.  The draft plan can be found in &lt;a href="http://www.co.orange.nc.us/occlerks/130514.pdf"&gt;the Work Session agenda&lt;/a&gt; (PDF) on the county website.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last time the library was discussed at the BOCC, the county staff suggested that the plan, which is being written up by Dr. Anthony Chow, an assistant professor in the Department of Library Science at UNC-Greensboro, would be critical to informing the site selection of the Southern Branch of the Orange County Library.  The plan begins on page 29 of the PDF after Dr. Chow's Curriculum Vitae.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/orange-county-to-discuss-strategic-library-plan-tuesday-night"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/E30ScpXGS-E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/orange-county-to-discuss-strategic-library-plan-tuesday-night#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/arts-038-culture">Arts &amp;amp; Culture</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/orange-county">Orange County</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/planning-transportation">Planning &amp;amp; Transportation</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/events">Events</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/carrboro">Carrboro</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/library">library</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/orange-county">Orange County</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/strategic-plan">Strategic Plan</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Patrick M</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7009 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/orange-county-to-discuss-strategic-library-plan-tuesday-night</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Refining the Obey Creek/ S15-501 Exploratory Phase process</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/ziaA-yLwAog/refining-the-obey-creek-s15-501-exploratory-phase-process</link>
 <description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;During their April 29, 2013 work session, Chapel Hill Town Council continued to discuss and refine a process plan and schedule for Obey Creek and S15-501.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;The process consists of two phases – an Exploratory phase during which a team of consultants will facilitate a planning process and, if the resulting project plan is deemed appropriate for a Development Agreement, a Negotiation and Implementation phase will follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;Focus during the council work session was on a fleshed out plan for the Exploratory Phase which is the product of a collaborative effort between town staff, East West Partners and two community members. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;The new plan calls for a six to nine month public engagement process that includes many opportunities for public engagement.   However, the plan provides no formalized mechanism for citizen inclusion in decision-making or process leadership. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/refining-the-obey-creek-s15-501-exploratory-phase-process"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/ziaA-yLwAog" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/refining-the-obey-creek-s15-501-exploratory-phase-process#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/growth-development">Growth &amp;amp; Development</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/ch2020">CH2020</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/development-agreement">development agreement</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/obey-creek">Obey Creek</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/s15-501">S15-501</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/steering-committee">steering committee</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 12:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jeanne Brown</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7008 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/refining-the-obey-creek-s15-501-exploratory-phase-process</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Welcome to the OP Posse, Travis Crayton!</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/3SVSaKSAp6s/welcome-to-the-op-posse-travis-crayton</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today I am very happy to announce that we have a new member joining 
the OrangePolitics Posse (a.k.a. editorial board)! Travis Crayton has 
been &lt;a href="/blog/tjcrayton"&gt;a regular poster &amp;amp; commenter here on OP for almost 2 years&lt;/a&gt;. Travis first became interested in local issues when he served as 
treasurer and an active volunteer for Lee Storrow's 2011 campaign. Since
 then, he's become particularly interested in transit, economic 
development, town-university relations, and all things downtown. He 
graduates &lt;span class="aBn"&gt;&lt;span class="aQJ"&gt;this Sunday&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt; from UNC with a degree in political science and public policy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/welcome-to-the-op-posse-travis-crayton"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/3SVSaKSAp6s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/welcome-to-the-op-posse-travis-crayton#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/about-this-web-site">About This Web Site</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/%5Bvocab%5D/%5Bcat%5D-1">OP Posse</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/travis-crayton">Travis Crayton</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ruby Sinreich</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7007 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/welcome-to-the-op-posse-travis-crayton</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Is there a fine line between engagable government and too sassy?</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/Aj9-En-GW-0/is-there-a-fine-line-between-engagable-government-and-too-sassy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hat tip to our friend Lee Storrow for noticing this blog post on &lt;a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/jonathancoby/16-sassy-tweets-from-the-nations-16th-largest-sch-afb2"&gt;&amp;quot;16 Sassy Tweets From The Nation's 16th Largest School District&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; about &lt;a href="https://twitter.com/wcpss"&gt;Wake County Schools' Twitter feed&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-there-a-fine-line-between-engagable-government-and-too-sassy"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/Aj9-En-GW-0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-there-a-fine-line-between-engagable-government-and-too-sassy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government/the-democracy-problem">Democracy &amp;amp; Open Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/schools">Schools</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/the-triangle">The Triangle</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/chccs">CHCCS</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/twitter">twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/wake-county">Wake County</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 04:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>James Barrett</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7005 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/05/is-there-a-fine-line-between-engagable-government-and-too-sassy</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Rosemary Imagined: New process to develop our community dream for Rosemary Street</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/Aeg-tYI1Tpg/rosemary-imagined-new-process-to-develop-our-community-dream-for-rosemary-street</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rosemary Street in downtown Chapel Hill has a lot of untapped potential and is already a vibrant intersection for students and permanent residents (including long-time residents of the historically African American Northside neighborhood). The Town of Chapel Hill Economic Development Office and the Chapel Hill Downtown Partnership have teamed up to create a new process they are calling '&lt;strong&gt;Rosemary Imagined&lt;/strong&gt;,' which they are promoting as &amp;quot;&lt;em&gt;an innovative community-led process to 
refine our thinking of how Rosemary Street fits into the development and
 growth of Downtown Chapel Hill&lt;/em&gt;.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/rosemary-imagined-new-process-to-develop-our-community-dream-for-rosemary-street"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/Aeg-tYI1Tpg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/rosemary-imagined-new-process-to-develop-our-community-dream-for-rosemary-street#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/economy-038-downtown">Economy &amp;amp; Downtown</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/chapel-hill">Chapel Hill</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/chapel-hill-downtown-parntership">Chapel Hill Downtown Parntership</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/development">development</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/rosemary-street">Rosemary Street</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Molly De Marco</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">7004 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/rosemary-imagined-new-process-to-develop-our-community-dream-for-rosemary-street</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Count-down on rural curbside recycling</title>
 <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~3/5dTJT2mF3eU/count-down-on-rural-curbside-recycling</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;On
 Tuesday evening, the Board of County Commissioners will hold a public 
hearing on recycling. There has been a change in the way the law is 
being interpreted which makes the current fee system questionable. 
Currently the county is divided into 3 sections. Some of the rural 
community pays for 2 of the 3R fees (availability and convenience 
centers) and the portion of the rural community that gets curbside 
collection on recycling pays for those same 2 + an additional fee of $38
 for collections. A new funding source is needed for the curbside 
collections portion of the fee (a service that effects about 13,000 
residents). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The
 county is considering 3 options to get around this legal issue. 1) go 
to a solid waste authority (like OWASA) that would be a separate 
operational and financial unit, 2) create 3 solid waste tax districts, 
or 3) eliminate curbside collection for neighborhoods outside of a city 
limit. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/count-down-on-rural-curbside-recycling"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OPfrontpage/~4/5dTJT2mF3eU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/count-down-on-rural-curbside-recycling#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/environment">Environment</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/government">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/issues/orange-county">Orange County</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/county-commissioners">County Commissioners</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/recycling">recycling</category>
 <category domain="http://orangepolitics.org/tags/waste-reduction">waste reduction</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 22:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Terri Buckner</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">6997 at http://orangepolitics.org</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://orangepolitics.org/2013/04/count-down-on-rural-curbside-recycling</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
