<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
<title>Ogletree Deakins</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ogletree.com/?feed=all" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ogletree.com/</link>
	<description>Employers and lawyers. Working Together</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:38:12 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Won’t Hear Challenge to NLRB Member Removal</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/supreme-court-wont-hear-challenge-to-nlrb-member-removal</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Brian E. Hayes and Zachary V. Zagger]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traditional Labor Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 19, 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States declined to hear a case brought by former National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member Gwynne Wilcox, who had asserted that statutory for-cause removal protections for NLRB members limited the president’s authority to remove her from office in 2025.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Refuses to Block Executive Order Barring ‘Racially Discriminatory DEI Activities’ by Federal Contractors</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/court-refuses-to-block-executive-order-barring-racially-discriminatory-dei-activities-by-federal-contractors</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: T. Scott Kelly, Nonnie L. Shivers, and Zachary V. Zagger]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Contracting and Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workforce Analytics and Compliance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 14, 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland declined to preliminarily enjoin President Donald Trump’s executive order requiring federal contractors to agree not to engage in “racially discriminatory” diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities, or to stay related Federal Acquisition Regulatory (FAR) Council guidance.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Jersey Considers CREAMMA Drug-Testing Amendment for Certain Safety-Sensitive Positions</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/new-jersey-considers-creamma-drug-testing-amendment-for-certain-safety-sensitive-positions</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Michael J. Riccobono]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug Testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trucking & Logistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2026, New Jersey State Senator Brian P. Stack introduced <a href="https://pub.njleg.gov/Bills/2026/S5000/4685_I1.HTM">Senate Bill S4685</a>, which, if enacted into law, would prohibit certain groups of employees—specifically, law enforcement officers, first responders, drivers with a commercial driver’s license (CDL), and operators of heavy equipment—from using cannabis recreationally, whether on or off duty. The legislation would therefore eliminate existing employment protections for such employees by allowing employers to take adverse action against them for using cannabis.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecticut Adopts Law Governing Electronic Monitoring in the Workplace</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/connecticut-adopts-law-governing-electronic-monitoring-in-the-workplace</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: John G. Stretton]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence and Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Developments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective October 1, 2026, Connecticut employers must provide employees with written notice before engaging in workplace monitoring.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beltway Buzz, October 16, 2026</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/beltway-buzz-october-16-2026</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 22:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: James J. Plunkett]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Governmental Affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The <em>Beltway Buzz</em><sup>®</sup> is a weekly update summarizing labor and employment news from inside the Beltway and clarifying how what’s happening in Washington, D.C., could impact your business.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delaware Employers Face Tighter AI and Profiling Rules Effective January 2027</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/delaware-employers-face-tighter-ai-and-profiling-rules-effective-january-2027</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 21:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Harris S. Freier and Elizabeth R. Lash]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence and Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity and Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Developments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="https://attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/fraud/personal-data-privacy-portal/frequently-asked-questions/">New amendments</a> to Delaware’s data privacy law that will take effect on January 1, 2027, may have an impact on how employers use artificial intelligence (AI) tools in employment decisions.]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Federal Court Enforces Noncompete Against Former Executive Employee</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/massachusetts-federal-court-enforces-noncompete-against-former-executive-employee</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 15:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Michael Clarkson and Kathryn Couture]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Competition and Trade Secrets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Massachusetts recently granted an employer’s application for a preliminary injunction against its former executive employee, finding the company’s noncompete provisions enforceable under the Massachusetts Noncompetition Agreement Act (MNAA). This decision provides important guidance to employers pertaining to the enforceability of restrictive covenants under Massachusetts law. ]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-Border Catch-Up: Managing Employee Travel to High-Risk Locations Worldwide (Podcast)</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/podcasts/2026-10-15/cross-border-catch-up-managing-employee-travel-to-high-risk-locations-worldwide</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Samantha R. Duncan and Jane Jeong]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross-Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersecurity and Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_podcast&#038;p=93785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of our Cross-Border Catch-Up podcast series, Samantha Duncan (Washington, D.C.) and Jane Jeong (New York) discuss the key pillars of an effective risk management framework for multinational employers whose employees travel to or work from high-risk locations. Jane and Samantha cover how to classify risk using resources like the U.S. State Department’s [&#8230;]]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-Border Catch-Up: Fixed-Term Employment Contracts Outside the U.S. (Podcast)</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/podcasts/2026-10-15/cross-border-catch-up-fixed-term-employment-contracts-outside-the-u-s</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 12:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Samantha R. Duncan and Kristyn L. Lambert]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cross-Border]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_podcast&#038;p=93783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this episode of our Cross-Border Catch-Up podcast series, Samantha Duncan (Washington, D.C.) and Kristyn Lambert (New Orleans) examine why fixed-term employment contracts, which U.S. employers often treat as simple scheduling tools, operate under a separate set of rules in most  countries. Kristyn and Samantha discuss how fixed-term and indefinite contracts differ in justification, termination, [&#8230;]]]></description>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington State DOSH Proposes Update to Construction PPE Rules</title>
		<link>https://ogletree.com/insights-resources/blog-posts/washington-state-dosh-proposes-update-to-construction-ppe-rules</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[By: Jeff T. Leslie and Kenneth M. Rock]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Safety and Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ogletree.com/?post_type=od_insight&#038;p=93746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 6, 2026, the Washington State Department of Labor &#38; Industries (L&#38;I) Division of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) filed a <a href="https://www.lni.wa.gov/rulemaking-activity/AO26-08/2608Proposal.pdf?utm_medium=email&#38;utm_source=govdelivery">proposed rulemaking</a> seeking to update Washington’s construction personal protective equipment (PPE) rules. ]]></description>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 81/98 objects using Memcached
Page Caching using Memcached (Requested URI contains query) 

Served from: ogletree.com @ 2026-10-19 19:49:30 by W3 Total Cache
-->