<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ohio Gaming Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2021 19:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">119934911</site>	<item>
		<title>Sports Betting Has Come to Ohio</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2643</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2021 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 29]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2643</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sports gaming is finally coming to Ohio. The legislature passed House Bill 29 which authorizes sports gaming in Ohio no later than January 1, 2023. The new version of the bill that came out of months’ of negotiation within the conference committee provides numerous opportunities for entities wishing to enter Ohio’s sports gaming market. Types [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sports gaming is finally coming to Ohio. The legislature passed House Bill 29 which authorizes sports gaming in Ohio no later than January 1, 2023. The new version of the bill that came out of months’ of negotiation within the conference committee provides numerous opportunities for entities wishing to enter Ohio’s sports gaming market.</p>
<strong>Types and Number of Licenses Available</strong>
<p>Ohio will provide three types of gaming licenses:</p>

Type A, online sport gaming proprietors;
Type B, brick and mortar sports gaming proprietors; and
Type C, lottery sports gaming proprietors.

<p>Each type of license will be limited though there is the possibility the Casino Control Commission could issue more than the initial limit of type A licenses. Initially, there will be no more than 25 type A licenses, 40 type B licenses, and 20 type C licenses.</p>
<strong>Bars and Sports Gaming</strong>
<p>Type C licenses will authorize type C sports gaming proprietors to offer lottery sports gaming. Lottery sports gaming means sports gaming conducted by a Type C sports gaming proprietor on behalf of the state lottery commission and offered through type C licenses hosts. Any D-1, D-2, or D-5 liquor permit holder may apply to be a type C license host. A type C license host will be allowed to have, initially, up to two sports betting kiosks or clerk operated sports gaming terminals where limited bets will be allowed. Type C sports gaming proprietors will only be allowed to offer the following types of bets:</p>

Spread wagers;
Over-under wagers;
Moneyline wagers; and
Parlay wagers that are based on not more than four component wagers.

<p>Type C self-service terminals or clerks will not be allowed to accept wagers aggregating more than $700 in a calendar week from any one participant.</p>
<strong>License Fees</strong>
<p>The law sets out initial and renewal license fees for each license type but have left the application fee to be set by the Casino Control Commission. License fees vary not only by license type but also within certain license types depending on whether or not the applicant is a professional sports organization or how many skins the applicant may have or how many license types the applicant may have.</p>
<p>The law also sets out various criteria each applicant must meet at a minimum but also leaves some room for the Casino Control Commission to establish rules and criteria for the application process.</p>
<strong>Timeline</strong>
<p>Casino Control Representatives have stated that though sports gaming is finally coming to Ohio it will be later rather than sooner. The Commission will have to craft rules, offer them for public comment, and then get them approved. This process is expected to take at least five to six months. Realistically, this means hopeful market participants will not be able to even apply for a license until summer or fall of 2022.</p>
<p>The Ohio Casino Control Commission has already issued its first set of proposed rules which can be found <a href="https://mcusercontent.com/1c618d44ec5c718843ae2e7bb/files/b01de22b-e007-5e7f-f1cb-c362db9205d3/SG_Rules_Batch_1_Combined.pdf">here</a>.</p>
<p>Feel free to <a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/sports-betting/">contact us</a> if you have any questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2643</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Update on Sports Betting in Ohio</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2600</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 13:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last week, a substitute Senate Bill 176 was introduced, which made a litany of changes to Ohio’s proposed sports betting industry. And today, a few days after those changes were introduced, an omnibus amendment was passed to make even more changes to the bill, which was referred out of the Ohio Senate over to the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Last week, <a href="https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2573">a substitute Senate Bill 176 was introduced</a>, which made a litany of changes to Ohio’s proposed sports betting industry. And today, a few days after those changes were introduced, an omnibus amendment was passed to make even more changes to the bill, which was referred out of the Ohio Senate over to the House. Here is a summary of some of the most significant changes. </p>



<p><strong>The Lottery is Out, but Bars and Restaurants are In</strong></p>



<p>The sports gaming lottery pool has been removed from the
bill. Instead, there will now be an unlimited number of Type C host licenses
available to D liquor permit holders that wish to be licensed to host sports
betting kiosks in their establishments. D liquor permit holders wishing to host
sports betting kiosks must be licensed by the Casino Control Commission and pay
a $6,000 license fee, which will be good for three years with a $6,000 fee due
upon each renewal. Sports betting kiosks will be limited in the bets they can
offer to moneyline, spread, and over/under bets, and no patron can bet more than
$200 per day on a sports betting kiosk. There can also be no more than two
kiosks in each licensed establishment. The kiosks must accept only credit and
debit cards and payouts must be made back to the card.</p>



<p>Sports betting kiosks will be provided by Type C sports
gaming proprietors (a nomenclature change from “gaming agent” made throughout
the bill). No fewer than 3 and no more than 20 Type C proprietor licenses will
be granted. Type C proprietor licenses will have an initial fee of $100,000 and
a renewal fee of $25,000 every three years. Type C proprietors will be held to
the same standards in respect to suitability, background checks, and financial
proof as A and B licenses. </p>



<p><strong>More Licenses, but Geographic Limits on Type B</strong></p>



<p>The amount of available Type A licenses (online gaming)
increases from 20 to 25. The amount of Type B licenses (brick and mortar)
increases from 20 to 33. However, Type B licenses shall be allowed only in
counties with populations greater than 100,000, per the 2010 census. The volume
of licenses available in the county will be:</p>



   <strong>Population   </strong><strong>   No. of Type B  Licenses   </strong>   Less than 100,000      
  0
     100,000-500,000      
  1
     500,000-1,000,000        
  2
  
  1,000,000+
  
  3
  



<p></p>



<p>Type B licenses will be available only to entities that can
demonstrate significant economic activity in the county in which the license is
to be operated. Type B licenses will be subject to an initial application fee
of $100,000 with $25,000 renewal fees due every three years. Type A licenses
will have an initial fee of $1,000,000 and the same is due upon renewal every
three years. </p>



<p><strong>Ohio Professional Teams Get Preference</strong></p>



<p>Ohio professional teams (NBA/NFL/MLB/NHL/MLS) and facilities
that host annual PGA Tour tournaments (i.e. Muirfield) and the promotor of a
NASCAR race in the state (Mid-Ohio Sports Car Course) will all have preference
for Type A and B Licenses. However, if a team leaves Ohio it automatically
loses its licenses. </p>



<p><strong>Additional Changes and Items of Note</strong></p>



<p>Other changes include the creation of a definition for
Mobile Management Service Provider for Type A licenses, the express inclusion
of Esports as included in the definition of sporting events, and the
elimination of the prohibition on wagering on events with participants younger
than 18. With respect to the age prohibition, the logic is that some tennis
matches and Olympic competitors may be younger than 18, so the Casino Control
Commission will have discretion on whether to authorize wagering on those
events. This also harmonizes the reporting threshold for back taxes and child
support with the threshold found in the IRS code. </p>



<p><strong>Timing</strong></p>



<p>Ohio Senator Kirk Schuring, chair of the Senate Select
Committee on Gaming, stated that the goal would be to pass the legislation no
later than June 30. One of the changes to the bill was to eliminate the
prohibition on wagering before January 1, 2022. However, that doesn’t mean
wagering on sports will necessarily be allowed before then as the omnibus
amendment instituted new requirements that the Casino Control Commission accept
sports gaming proprietor licenses beginning on January 1, 2022, and begin issuing
licenses no later than April 1, 2022. It would be safe to assume there will be
no wagering before the first licenses are issued, so sports wagering may not be
available in Ohio until April or May of 2022. </p>



<p>Now that the bill has passed the Senate, it’s onto the Ohio
House and we will see what, if any, changes await it there. </p>



<p><em>This article was co-authored by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/dove">Robert Dove</a>, a gaming law attorney with Kegler Brown,
and&nbsp;<a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/zatezalo">Mike Zatezalo</a>, chair of the firm’s Gaming Law
practice. Robert and Mike will continue to provide updates on this evolving
legislation and are already partnering with established operators and emerging
businesses on potential licensure, lobbying assistance and supply chain
strategy as those businesses prepare to maximize their opportunities in
anticipation of new sports betting opportunities in Ohio.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2600</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Substitute Bill Already in the Works for Sports Gaming</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2573</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2021 17:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Less than a week after Senate Bill 176 (“SB 176”) was introduced, significant changes have been made and will be introduced via a substitute bill soon. At the first hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Gaming since SB 176 was introduced, sponsors Manning and Antani announced a substitute bill will be introduced soon, which [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a week after Senate Bill 176 (“SB 176”) was <a href="https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2567">introduced</a>, significant changes have been made and will be introduced via a substitute bill soon. At the first hearing of the Senate Select Committee on Gaming since SB 176 was introduced, sponsors Manning and Antani announced a substitute bill will be introduced soon, which will make several key changes.<br />
<strong>Sports Gaming Facility + Casinos/Racinos</strong><br />
One of the changes is to authorize casinos or racinos that receive a Type B license (brick and mortar license) to build a sports gaming facility within their existing casino or racino premises. The original bill allowed casino and racinos to apply for a Type B licenses, but prohibited them from building the licensed facility within their current premises.<br />
<strong>Connection to Ohio</strong><br />
Another change was made to the requirements for applicants of a Type A license, which will authorize the licensee to offer online or mobile sports gaming. Under the expected substitute bill, all Type A sports gaming agents must have a connection to Ohio, including a requirement that they maintain at least one place of business in Ohio. The purpose of this change, per the sponsors, is to avoid untethered online operators with no presence in Ohio. Additionally, Type A sports gaming agents will be authorized to contract with as many mobile app providers as they wish, assuming those providers hold a management services provider license from the Ohio Casino Control Commission.<br />
<strong>No More “First-Come, First Served”</strong><br />
Finally, another key change was the elimination of language stating that licenses would be awarded on a “first-come, first-served” basis. The purpose of this elimination, per the sponsors, is to provide the Casino Control Commission with discretion to instead choose the strongest applicants to receive licenses. The proposed change will authorize the Commission to consider various factors when comparing applicants, with the goal of ensuring license holders are best positioned to provide the services for which they are licensed. One of those factors is regional geography; specifically referring to the type and volume of economic development the applicant may bring to the state.</p>
<p>An update will be provided once the substitute bill is released and as further changes are proposed.</p>
<p><em>This article was co-authored by <a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/dove">Robert Dove</a>, a gaming law attorney with Kegler Brown, and <a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/zatezalo">Mike Zatezalo</a>, chair of the firm’s Gaming Law practice. Robert and Mike will continue to provide updates on this evolving legislation and are already partnering with established operators and emerging businesses on potential licensure, lobbying assistance and supply chain strategy as those businesses prepare to maximize their opportunities in anticipation of new sports betting opportunities in Ohio.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2573</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports Gaming Legislation Introduced in Ohio</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2567</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2021 17:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ohio’s newest omnibus gaming bill was introduced on Thursday, May 6. Senate Bill 176 (“SB 176”) covers a range of topics, including the authorization of sports betting, the creation of a sports betting pool within the lottery, online sports gaming, authorization of electronic instant bingo, and also established a committee to study the potential effects [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohio’s newest omnibus gaming bill was introduced on Thursday, May 6. Senate Bill 176 (“SB 176”) covers a range of topics, including the authorization of sports betting, the creation of a sports betting pool within the lottery, online sports gaming, authorization of electronic instant bingo, and also established a committee to study the potential effects of online lottery ticket sales (known as iLottery) on retail ticket sales in Ohio. Upon analyzing the wide breadth of topics (SB 176 is more than 250 pages), this article will provide a breakdown of several key provisions related to the proposed authorization of sports gaming.<br />
<strong>The Authorization of Sports Betting</strong><br />
SB 176 proposes to legalize and regulate sports betting in Ohio through a sports gaming lottery offered by the Ohio Lottery Commission and sports gaming agents licenses with regulation by the Ohio Casino Control Commission (the “Commission”). The proposed law expressly prohibits any bets from being placed prior to January 1, 2022.<br />
<strong>Permitted Sporting Events for Betting</strong><br />
Predictably, “sports gaming” is not defined under the bill to include already-authorized gaming activity, such as casino gaming, fantasy contests, lottery games (other than the sports gaming lottery), or pari-mutuel horse race wagering. A “sporting event” may be any professional sport or athletic event, any collegiate sport or athletic event, any motor race event, any Olympic or international sports competition, the individual performance statistics of athletes or participants in any of the aforementioned event or events, or any other special event authorized by the Commission.</p>
<p>Even though the Commission may authorize betting on any of the above-approved events, it is not required. The Commission can restrict betting on approved event types, independently or at the request of any person or sports governing body. Further, specific bet types may also be restricted or requested to be restricted. Betting will not be allowed on primary or secondary school events or athletes.<br />
<strong>Sports Gaming Lottery</strong><br />
The bill would authorize the Lottery Commission to offer a sports gaming lottery in the form of a sports pool. Entrants, who must be at least 21 years old, will pay $20 for a ticket where they select an outcome of a sporting event or events, the Lottery Commission will retain a fixed portion of each entry fee and the remainder will be split equally among the winning entrants. All other forms of sports betting will fall under the purview of the Ohio Casino Control Commission.<br />
<strong>Sports Gaming Agents</strong><br />
Under the bill, the Ohio Casino Control Commission will be able to issue 20 “Type A” licenses and 20 “Type B” licenses to qualified applicants who will then become “sports gaming agents.”</p>
<p>An applicant must do each of the following:</p>
<p> 	Submit a written application to the Commission;<br />
 	Pay a nonrefundable fee in an amount to be determined by the Commission;<br />
 	Pass a criminal background check;<br />
 	Provide a surety bond to the state in an amount approved by the Commission, and submit to an audit of the applicant’s financial transactions and condition of the applicant’s total operations for the previous fiscal year; and<br />
 	Satisfy any other requirements under the bill or established by Commission rules.</p>
<p>If approved for a Type A or B license, a sports gaming agent must pay a nonrefundable license fee of $1 million and their license is valid for 3 years. A licensee may submit for a renewal license every three years, fulfilling all the same requirements, unless their license was previously revoked.<br />
<strong>Type A Licenses (Online/Mobile Gaming)</strong><br />
Type A licenses authorize a sports gaming agent to offer sports gaming through an online sports pool under one brand name. An “online sports pool” means an application whereby a bettor can place a sports bet through an online or mobile device. The bill currently limits the availability of Type A licenses to 20, which will be awarded to eligible applicants on a first-come, first-served basis. A sports gaming agent that fails to offer sports gaming under a Type A license for a continuous period of one year or more can have its license revoked. No one individual (person or corporation) may hold more than five Type A licenses at a time.</p>
<p>Type A sports gaming agents must utilize geofencing to ensure bettors are physically located in the state. The servers accepting the wagers must also be located in Ohio. Bettors must set up sports gaming accounts in their full legal name and may establish the account either in person or online, so long as the registration is done in a manner that complies with the sports gaming agent’s internal controls.<br />
<strong>Type B Licenses (Brick and Mortar Gaming)</strong><br />
A Type B license authorizes a sports gaming agent to offer sports gaming at a single sports gaming facility. Like the Type A license, these will be limited to 20 licenses awarded on a first-come, first-served basis. “Sports gaming facility” means a designated area of a building, that is specifically not a casino or racino, in which bettors may place wagers on sporting events with a Type B sports gaming agent. A casino or racino may hold a Type B license, but the facility must be located on a separate premise from the casino or racino.</p>
<p>Type B sports gaming agents may offer wagers from individuals who are at least 21 and who are physically present in the sports gaming facility, either in person or through self-service machines. Bettors will be required to provide their full names and any other information the Commission requires.<br />
<strong>Additional Sports Gaming Related Licenses</strong><br />
The bill also creates a variety of licenses and licensing processes for sports gaming support services. This includes Commission-granted sports gaming occupation licenses for those employees of a sports gaming agent who will provide security, accept wagers, handle money in any way, or perform other duties that have the ability to alter material aspects of sports gaming conducted by their employers. Anyone who provides a sports gaming agent with sports gaming equipment or related services must be licensed through the Commission as a sports gaming supplier. The bill allows for reciprocity for either license type among jurisdictions that the Commission deems to impose substantially similar requirements for licensure.<br />
<strong>Integrity Monitoring</strong><br />
The bill requires the Commission to monitor all sports gaming conduct in the state with an independent integrity monitoring provider to identify unusual betting activity or patterns. Every sports gaming agent must also participate in the system as part of its minimum internal control standards. The system and its information is not a public record, though anonymized data can be provided at the request of a sports governing body that believes the integrity of its games may have been compromised.</p>
<p>There is no language in the proposed bill mandating the use of official league data or integrity fees to be paid to governing leagues.<br />
<strong>Taxes and Revenue</strong><br />
Sports gaming agents must pay a 10% tax on their net revenue from sports gaming regulated by the Commission. This tax is imposed on the “sports gaming receipts,” which means the total amount received as wagers minus any winnings paid and voided wagers. Sports gaming agents must file daily tax returns showing their gaming receipts and pay the tax due. Negative receipts may be allowed to be carried over against the next day’s receipts. Sports gaming agents who are not casinos will be subject to Ohio’s commercial activity tax, as well. Casinos are taxed on their gross casino revenue.</p>
<p>Revenue from the sports gaming lottery in excess of operation costs for the State Lottery Commission will be deposited into the Lottery Profits Education Fund for the benefit of elementary, secondary, vocational, and special education programs.</p>
<p>Further, revenue from all other forms of sports gaming will be deposited into a newly created Sports Gaming Revenue Fund, which, after deducting any amounts needed to pay tax refunds or to cover the Department of Taxation’s administrative expenses, will be used as follows:</p>
<p> 	98% must go to the Sports Gaming Profits Education Fund to support K-12 education programs as determined in appropriations by the General Assembly; and<br />
 	2% must go to the Problem Sports Gaming Fund.</p>
<p><em>This article was authored by <a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/dove">Robert Dove</a>, a gaming law attorney with Kegler Brown, and <a href="https://www.keglerbrown.com/zatezalo">Mike Zatezalo</a>, chair of the firm’s Gaming Law practice. Robert and Mike will continue to provide updates on this evolving legislation and are already partnering with established operators and emerging businesses on potential licensure, lobbying assistance and supply chain strategy as those businesses prepare to maximize their opportunities in anticipation of new sports betting opportunities in Ohio.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2567</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penn National – Barstool Deal Breakdown</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2564</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barstool Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penn National Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The last week of January brought news of a unique deal between casino operator Penn National Gaming, owner of two casinos and two racinos in Ohio, and Barstool Sports. Penn National will make an initial investment of $163 million for a 36% interest in the Barstool Sports media company. The initial $163 million investment consists [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last week of January brought news of a unique deal between casino operator Penn National Gaming, owner of two casinos and two racinos in Ohio, and Barstool Sports.</p>
<p>Penn National will make an initial investment of $163 million for a 36% interest in the Barstool Sports media company. The initial $163 million investment consists of approximately $135 million in cash and approximately $28 million in shares of non-voting convertible preferred Penn stock.</p>
<p>Additionally, under the terms of the deal, Penn will increase its stake in Barstool to 50% in three years for an additional investment of approximately $62 million. The deal also contains an option for Penn to eventually purchase the remaining interest in Barstool.</p>
<p>Penn National is hoping that the deal will drive some of Barstool’s 66 million monthly consumers to one of Penn National’s 41 casinos in 19 states. Penn secured exclusive rights to Barstool’s brand for use at Penn’s properties and for its online gaming operation. The deal has a 40 year term and will enable Penn to capitalize on Barstool’s already established sports betting presence.<br />
Sports Betting Opportunities<br />
Sports betting is currently occurring in 14 states with 14 more considering sports betting legislation. Six states have passed legislation and will roll out sports betting within this year. Mobile betting has proven to be responsible for the lion’s share of legal sports betting, accounting for about 80% of wagering in New Jersey in 2019. Penn is banking on that percentage applying nationwide as more and more states legalize.</p>
<p>Barstool, established in 2003, has always had a focus on sports betting and offered tips since its inception as a Boston based print publication.  In 2019, Barstool had a soft launch for its site Barstool Bets, which, according to Penn National, has already had about 100,000 people sign up since September. Sports bettering attracts a generally affluent, male customer base and Barstool’s primary audience is male. Sixty-five percent of Barstool’s audience falls between the ages of 21 and 44 and 62% of them gamble on sports. Of that 62%, 44% claim to bet weekly with an average bet of $51. The strength of the Barstool brand and its cohesiveness with sports betting is what Penn wants to capitalize upon and monetize.</p>
<p>Under the terms of the deal, Barstool will maintain editorial control over its websites but will incorporate Penn National advertisements. Similarly, Penn National will brand its brick and mortar sportsbooks and its mobile app, debuting in August, as Barstool.</p>
<p>Penn National has agreements with other sports betting companies DraftKings, PointsBet, theScore, and The Stars Group to operate online betting in its casinos. But Penn has not captured the massive increase in online sports wagering that other properties have who have partnered with other sports media companies like FanDuel. Penn seeks to change that with this new deal.<br />
Additional Benefits<br />
Penn hopes to see additional benefits beyond sports betting through this deal in the form of a younger customer base. Penn’s CEO Jay Snowden noted that their average customer is in their mid-50s but both Barstool’s audience and sports bettors are a younger demographic. Snowden stated, “Sports betting is a great nexus for us to attract and convert younger sports bettors.” Since 65% of Barstool’s audience is between the ages of 21 and 44 this provides the opportunity for Penn to reach its target market while also lowering the average age of its customers.</p>
<p>&#8220;We needed to find a sports media partner that had a great brand, had a loyal audience, that wanted to fully integrate and align with Penn National Gaming and that wanted skin in the game with us,&#8221; Snowden stated. &#8220;And Barstool is that partner.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2564</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports Betting in Ohio Not If but When</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2562</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 194]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lottery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Casino Control Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Lottery Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 111]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Last year, two competing bills were introduced that would authorize and regulate sports betting in Ohio. House Bill 194 was introduced by Representatives Dave Greenspan and Brigid Kelly. Senate Bill 111 was introduced by Senators John Eklund and Sean O’Brien. The House bill received eight hearings in 2019 while the Senate Bill only received two [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year, two competing bills were introduced that would authorize and regulate sports betting in Ohio. House Bill 194 was introduced by Representatives Dave Greenspan and Brigid Kelly. Senate Bill 111 was introduced by Senators John Eklund and Sean O’Brien. The House bill received eight hearings in 2019 while the Senate Bill only received two but neither has received a hearing since the first week of November 2019.</p>
<p>While the process has slowed down in Ohio it is highly unlikely that it has ended. Especially, considering that in December Michigan became the fourth of Ohio’s neighboring states to legalize sports betting. The only neighbor left to legalize, Kentucky, advanced for a full House vote earlier this month. Ohio does not want to be left behind or abdicate the money its citizens will inevitably spend sports betting to neighboring states. So what is the hold up in Ohio?</p>
<p>The key difference between the House and Senate sports betting bills is who will be the agency in charge of overseeing sports betting. The Senate version places sports betting under the purview of the Ohio Casino Control Commission. This is the preferred regulating agency for both the Governor and the Senate President. The House version places this responsibility with the Ohio Lottery Commission. The House Speaker prefers the Lottery Commission regulate sports betting.</p>
<p>Other differences between the two bills are the tax on the betting and the use of the proceeds. The House Bill contains a 10% tax rate and earmarks the funds for education and problem gambling programs. The Senate version contains a 6.25% tax rate and has no earmarks on the proceeds and instead directs them into the general fund. Additionally, the House version, with regulation falling to the Lottery Commission would open the door to businesses other than casinos, such as bars and restaurants.</p>
<p>That difference is mitigated by the fact both proposals would legalize mobile betting. Given the ubiquity of smart phones, from a consumer perspective, the benefits of placing sports betting terminals in bars or restaurants would seem slim. Instead, those establishments may be better served investing in and advertising strong wireless internet services. This is the tact taken by many bars and restaurants in other states with legal mobile gaming to entice customers into their facility and keep them there.</p>
<p>It is likely the two bills meet in conference committee and some agreement is hammered out between the House and Senate. Undoubtedly, neither chamber wants to see money flow to neighboring states that could be used in Ohio. The question is, how quickly an agreement can be reached.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2562</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio Casinos and Racinos See Record Highs in January 2020</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2560</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 20:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belterra Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Rock Northfield Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hard Rock Rocksino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Columbus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Dayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Mahoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood Toledo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JACK Cincinnati]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JACK Cleveland Casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miami Valley Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scioto Downs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thistledown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first month of 2020 was an exceptional one for Ohio’s casinos and racinos which shattered their previous January record high for gambling revenue. The casinos and racinos combined for $167 million in gambling revenue up 19% from the previous high set last year of $140.7 million. Each year the casinos and racinos have increased [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first month of 2020 was an exceptional one for Ohio’s casinos and racinos which shattered their previous January record high for gambling revenue. The casinos and racinos combined for $167 million in gambling revenue up 19% from the previous high set last year of $140.7 million. Each year the casinos and racinos have increased their January gambling revenue over the previous year but never by such a high margin.</p>
<p>Hollywood Casino Columbus had the best January of Ohio’s Casinos bringing in $20.4 million from slot machines and table games, though Jack Cincinnati saw the greatest gambling revenue increase from the prior January with a 22% jump. The top performing slots-only racino was MGM Northfield Park with $22.9 million but Miami Valley Gaming saw the greatest increase from the prior January with a 24% jump in gambling revenue. The increases may be partially attributed to the extra Friday in January this year.</p>
<p>The full breakdown of increases among the casino is Hollywood Columbus ($20.4 million) up 18%, Jack Cincinnati ($18.7 million) up 22%, Hollywood Toledo ($15.7 million) up 11%, Jack Cleveland ($18.3 million) up 17%. Among the racinos, Jack Thistledown ($11.8 million) was up 22%, MGM Northfield Park ($22.9 Million) was up 17%, Hollywood Mahoning Valley ($11.1 million) was up 18%, Scioto Downs ($15.6 million) was up 22%, Miami Valley Gaming ($15.6 million) was up 24%, Belterra Park ($7.3 million) was up 20%, and Hollywood Dayton ($10 Million) was up 23%. All percentages were rounded up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2560</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>But Is Sports Betting Really Worth It?</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2551</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Six states started sports betting in 2018. Revenues fell short of projections in four of the states. Several reasons why. Among them &#8211; slower than expected rollout, lack of online betting and even the Super Bowl. Rhode Island projected monthly revenues of $1 million. The reality – about $50,000 a month. Rhode Island is the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Six states started sports betting in 2018. Revenues fell short of projections in four of the states. Several reasons why. Among them &#8211; slower than expected rollout, lack of online betting and even the Super Bowl.</p>
<p>Rhode Island projected monthly revenues of $1 million. The reality – about $50,000 a month. Rhode Island is the only New England state that offers sports betting. Who’s going to bet against Tom Brady and the Pats who, as expected, covered the spread in a lackluster Super Bowl. Also, Rhode Island didn’t offer online betting until this month.</p>
<p>West Virginia projected annual revenue of $5.5 million. Through the first eight months of their fiscal year, actual revenue amounted to $862,000. A contract dispute led to a shutdown of two sports books and the only sports betting app at the outset of the NCAA basketball tournament.</p>
<p>Mississippi and Pennsylvania have generated revenues about half of what was projected. Mississippi faces competition from a gambling complex in Arkansas and Pennsylvania doesn’t allow online sports betting. Although Pennsylvania hopes to offer online betting sometime this summer.</p>
<p>New Jersey and Delaware are the only states to meet projections. For New Jersey, the availability of online betting is significant. State tax revenues of $1.8 million monthly is nearly the same as Nevada, which has had sports betting for decades. In Delaware, football betting is established, having been around since 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2551</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sports Betting in Neighboring States</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2549</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Casino Control Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 111]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While Ohio mulls over legalizing sports betting, virtually every surrounding state either has a law on the books or proposed legislation on the fast track. Pennsylvania and West Virginia have already legalized sports betting. In Kentucky, a House panel has passed a bill that would allow sports betting at approved locations such as a licensed [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Ohio mulls over legalizing sports betting, virtually every surrounding state either has a law on the books or proposed legislation on the fast track.</p>
<p>Pennsylvania and West Virginia have already legalized sports betting.</p>
<p>In Kentucky, a House panel has passed a bill that would allow sports betting at approved locations such as a licensed horse racing track or the Kentucky Speedway. In person and via an app would be permitted. The bill still has to make its way through the rest of the legislature.</p>
<p>In Indiana, the Senate has approved a comprehensive gambling bill that would allow sports betting. The House is now considering the bill. Indiana would also allow in person and online betting.</p>
<p>Michigan was on the fast track to legalize sports betting. A bill quickly passed through the House and Senate. But the lame duck Governor vetoed the bill in December, 2018. Legislators plan to reintroduce the bill sometime in 2019.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2549</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dueling Sports Betting Bills Introduced</title>
		<link>https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2547</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ogadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 194]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Casino Control Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Lottery Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 111]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VLT]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ohiogaming.keglerbrown.com/?p=2547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Ohio House and Senate have each introduced their own version of how sports betting should be regulated in the state. The Senate came first, introducing Senate Bill 111 in March. The House followed by introducing House Bill 194 in early April. There are differences between the two bills. Among the differences: The Senate bill [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ohio House and Senate have each introduced their own version of how sports betting should be regulated in the state. The Senate came first, introducing Senate Bill 111 in March. The House followed by introducing House Bill 194 in early April. There are differences between the two bills. Among the differences:</p>
<p> 	The Senate bill calls for the Ohio Casino Control Commission (OCCC) to regulate sports betting, where revenues would go to the state’s General Revenue Fund. The House bill would put control under the Ohio Lottery Commission, which would direct revenues towards K-12 education;<br />
 	The Senate bill imposes a 6.25% tax on revenues while the House bill calls for a 10% tax;<br />
 	The Senate bill would allow online betting. The House bill doesn’t address the issue;<br />
 	The Senate bill calls for each operator to pay a nonrefundable $100,000 application fee and an additional $100,000 every five years to continue operations. Additionally, each operator would have to apply for a management services provider license from the OCCC for a nonrefundable $10,000 fee and an annual nonrefundable renewal fee of $1,000. The House bill would require each operator to obtain a sports gaming agent license for a nonrefundable $100,000 application fee plus an annual renewal fee which would be the lesser of $100,000 or 1% of the licensee’s handle over the previous one year license term. Fraternal and veterans organizations would contract with a sports gaming agent to offer sports betting on a single terminal at the organization’s establishment. Each organization would pay a nonrefundable $1,000 application fee and an additional nonrefundable $1,000 fee annually to renew its contract.</p>
<p>Both bills would prohibit sports betting by anyone under 21. Betting on professional and college sporting events would take place in Ohio’s casinos and racinos. The House bill would also allow betting in any place with an approved sports gaming terminal.</p>
<p>Legislative researchers estimate annual revenue of $30 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2547</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
