<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/start.asp?submitted=true&amp;court=OK&amp;days=30</link><description>The last 10 published decisions for the Oklahoma Supreme Court Cases</description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 03:05:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>OSCN Feed Generator 3.4.0[www.oscn.net]</generator><language>en-us</language><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><webMaster>webmaster@oscn.net</webMaster><item><title>IN RE: Modernization of Law Libraries in Counties having a population of less than 300,000, 2026 OK 43, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=552157</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: Reinstatement of Credentials of Registered Courtroom Interpreter, 2026 OK 44, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=552160</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>RE: FEE SCHEDULE FOR CERTIFIED COURTROOM INTERPRETERS, 2026 OK 45, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=552136</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>IN THE MATTER  OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF OBA MEMBERS FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH MANDATORY CLE, SCBD-7905, 2026 OK 46, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=552144</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>IN THE MATTER OF THE STRIKING OF NAMES OF OBA MEMBERS FOR NONPAYMENT OF 2025 DUES, SCBD-7906, 2026 OK 47, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=552153</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>IN THE MATTER OF THE SUSPENSION OF MEMBERS OF THE OBA, SCBD 8136, 2026 OK 42, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=551905</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. STEFFEN, SCBD 8101, 2026 OK 41, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=551882</link><description><![CDATA[No Description Available, please check the website.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. OBA v. REEVES, SCBD 8019, 2026 OK 37, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=551746</link><description><![CDATA[&para;0 Pursuant to Rule 7.7 of the Oklahoma Rules of Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2011, ch. 1, app. 1-A, Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association, caused documentation to be transmitted to the Chief Justice of this Court following public reprimand and public censure in the states of Texas, Tennessee, and Alabama based on a sanctions order in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for using generative artificial intelligence to fabricate citations in two motions.         RESPONDENT PUBLICLY REPRIMANDED. ]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>OKLAHOMA SCHOOLS RISK MANAGEMENT TRUST v. LEXINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 123469, 2026 OK 38, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=551744</link><description><![CDATA[&para;0 Petitioner brought claims against the Respondent school districts for failure to pay one or more invoices and sought a declaratory judgment that an agreement between Petitioner and the Respondent school districts created an obligation for the Respondent school districts to pay the invoices. Petitioner and Respondent school districts filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment regarding Open Meeting Act compliance. The trial court rendered partial summary judgment in favor of Respondent school districts, finding that Petitioner willfully violated the Open Meeting Act. The trial court certified its order for interlocutory review. We granted Petitioner's petition for certified interlocutory appeal. We hold that Petitioner willfully violated the Open Meeting Act.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item><item><title>STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. STITT v. CITY OF TULSA et al., 123368, 2026 OK 39, ___ P.3d ___</title><link>http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/DeliverDocument.asp?CiteID=551748</link><description><![CDATA[&para;0 Petitioner brought this action seeking a writ of prohibition or mandamus and declaratory relief that Respondents entered into an invalid settlement agreement with Muscogee (Creek) Nation. Original jurisdiction is assumed, and the relief sought by Petitioner is granted.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 21:00:00 CST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>