<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CUEHQHw_cSp7ImA9WhBaEk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842</id><updated>2013-05-22T07:40:31.249-07:00</updated><category term="Utter Access" /><category term="Table Driven Properties" /><category term="table design" /><category term="Access" /><category term="smart tools" /><category term="transactions" /><category term="MS Access" /><category term="normalization" /><category term="developer toolkit" /><category term="normalization for normal people" /><title>... GPG On MS Access</title><subtitle type="html">It's all about the data.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>46</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnAccess" /><feedburner:info uri="onaccess" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YNRXs_fip7ImA9WhBTFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-40665672299837111</id><published>2013-02-10T12:13:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2013-02-11T18:13:14.546-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-02-11T18:13:14.546-08:00</app:edited><title>Look Out for Look Ups</title><summary type="html">For a long time now, I've argued that Lookup Fields in tables are One Bad Idea. I've even  Blogged about it.

Recently it occurred to me that maybe it's not enough to TELL people Lookups are almost always bad. There's  a world famous page that offers eight significant problems with Lookups. My complaints are actually focused on the fallout from Number 6 on that list. Lookup fields in tables &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/gu2EwngAzbY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/40665672299837111/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=40665672299837111&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/40665672299837111?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/40665672299837111?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/gu2EwngAzbY/look-out-for-look-ups.html" title="Look Out for Look Ups" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-98jddZvZzo0/URfyELJ-i_I/AAAAAAAAAOU/icIKQ2LzXkA/s72-c/DepartmentTable.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2013/02/look-out-for-look-ups.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEMCQXY4fyp7ImA9WhNaFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-757311927847744089</id><published>2013-01-29T19:22:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2013-01-29T19:27:40.837-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-01-29T19:27:40.837-08:00</app:edited><title>Ambiguity Is For Poets, Politicians and Comedians</title><summary type="html">Access developers already know this, of course, but sometimes we run into situations where we need to be reminded just how important it is.

The human mind thrives on ambiguity. Poetry is the art of making one multi-faceted word speak with many voices. Politicians couldn't survive in office more than a few minutes without the deft word play that conceals as much as it reveals about their true &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/kzW6yegrpRk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/757311927847744089/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=757311927847744089&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/757311927847744089?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/757311927847744089?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/kzW6yegrpRk/ambiguity-is-for-poets-politicians-and.html" title="Ambiguity Is For Poets, Politicians and Comedians" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2013/01/ambiguity-is-for-poets-politicians-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04DR3c6fyp7ImA9WhNbF0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-8049359408136593007</id><published>2013-01-19T14:04:00.002-08:00</published><updated>2013-01-20T13:06:16.917-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-01-20T13:06:16.917-08:00</app:edited><title>What Does a PCV Do Anyway?</title><summary type="html">My daddy taught me a lot about living a good life. I wish I'd been smart enough to pay better attention when I was 18, but I survived long enough to be able look back and pick out the important stuff through the prism of my own experience. For example, he taught me not to try to fix a PCV without the right tools, the right parts, and the right kind of training. Let me tell you about that.

My &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/KF0roKP5R_o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/8049359408136593007/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=8049359408136593007&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8049359408136593007?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8049359408136593007?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/KF0roKP5R_o/what-does-pcv-do-anyway.html" title="What Does a PCV Do Anyway?" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2013/01/what-does-pcv-do-anyway.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEEQns-cSp7ImA9WhNQGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-121310826477769628</id><published>2012-11-25T18:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-11-25T19:30:03.559-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-11-25T19:30:03.559-08:00</app:edited><title>Yes, We CAN Get There From Here </title><summary type="html">The day after Thanksgiving turned out to be a pretty good day. It was the day I discovered that sometime in the last couple of weeks, Microsoft had turned on a really significant functionality in the 2013 version of  Office 365. Specifically I'm referring to support for creating and deploying Access 2013 "hybrid" databases on Office 365 as well as in on-premises installations. 

This is a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/cUHnWHBjiII" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/121310826477769628/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=121310826477769628&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/121310826477769628?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/121310826477769628?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/cUHnWHBjiII/yes-we-can-get-there-from-here.html" title="Yes, We CAN Get There From Here " /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/11/yes-we-can-get-there-from-here.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0cNRHc7fyp7ImA9WhJVEEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-2186486548743418487</id><published>2012-08-26T15:08:00.003-07:00</published><updated>2012-08-26T15:11:35.907-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-08-26T15:11:35.907-07:00</app:edited><title>That was a CLOSE One!</title><summary type="html">A few days ago I gave in to a bit of discouragement and posted a long diatribe on why I am afraid the story for Office 365 and Access web apps is discouraging.

Well, it turns out I was premature in my efforts at digging a grave for my BFF, Access. What a relief.

Here are the three big reasons I was so pessimistic, and the reasons I now have a lot more reasonable view. Again, keep in mind that &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/amLd4BuXlDQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/2186486548743418487/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=2186486548743418487&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2186486548743418487?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2186486548743418487?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/amLd4BuXlDQ/that-was-close-one.html" title="That was a CLOSE One!" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/08/that-was-close-one.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEQERng9eyp7ImA9WhJWF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1493018478964026998</id><published>2012-08-23T15:17:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-08-23T18:38:27.663-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-08-23T18:38:27.663-07:00</app:edited><title>Data Siloing in Access 2013 Web Apps on Office 365: the spade that could finally bury Access</title><summary type="html">Sometimes, you gotta call a spade a spade. Spades, as you should know, are the tools used to bury things. I’m sitting here staring at my monitor trying to come to grips with the possibility that Access 2013 web apps on Office 365 are the spade that could finally bury Access. 

I’ll explain the three inter-related problems I see with Access 2013 web apps on Office 365 in a moment. First, I want to&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/RsqXci4yt_c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1493018478964026998/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1493018478964026998&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1493018478964026998?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1493018478964026998?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/RsqXci4yt_c/data-siloing-in-access-2013-web-apps-on.html" title="Data Siloing in Access 2013 Web Apps on Office 365: the spade that could finally bury Access" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/08/data-siloing-in-access-2013-web-apps-on.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0YBQXw-cCp7ImA9WhJRE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-2576751842517400646</id><published>2012-07-15T14:46:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-07-15T14:52:30.258-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-07-15T14:52:30.258-07:00</app:edited><title>Why I STILL Love Access</title><summary type="html">Here's to Access, My BFF 

Access has been very, very good to me. For at least the last 10 or 12 years, it's paid my rent, contributed to my daughter's college education and helped me put on a few pounds too many at the dinner table. And that's just the monetary side of things. There's also the on-going personal satisfaction of facing a new challenge from a client, or from a poster on Utter &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/eqOqkX-mJtA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/2576751842517400646/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=2576751842517400646&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2576751842517400646?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2576751842517400646?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/eqOqkX-mJtA/why-i-still-love-access.html" title="Why I STILL Love Access" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/07/why-i-still-love-access.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkQDQngyeCp7ImA9WhNbF04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-9091879023883760536</id><published>2012-03-30T22:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2013-01-20T18:12:53.690-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2013-01-20T18:12:53.690-08:00</app:edited><title>Hammers,  Rubber Washers, Lug Nuts  and Lookup Fields in Tables</title><summary type="html">Many, many years ago, I learned The First Three Rules of Plumbing.

Never start a plumbing project after all the hardware stores have closed.
Locate the main shut off valve before you start.
A hammer is not a good tool for changing rubber washers in a faucet in the kitchen sink.

You can probably guess how I came by that wisdom, so I'll spare you the details. I can assure you, though, The First &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/2ei--d4xy6Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/9091879023883760536/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=9091879023883760536&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/9091879023883760536?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/9091879023883760536?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/2ei--d4xy6Y/hammers-rubber-washers-lug-nuts-and.html" title="Hammers,  Rubber Washers, Lug Nuts  and Lookup Fields in Tables" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/03/hammers-rubber-washers-lug-nuts-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0ADRnkzcSp7ImA9WhRUEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1316579470584703568</id><published>2012-01-21T17:26:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-22T21:16:17.789-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-22T21:16:17.789-08:00</app:edited><title>Migrating Larger Tables to SharePoint</title><summary type="html">
This is the third, and possibly the last, in a series of blog posts on my experiences migrating data from a working Access/SQL Server database to SharePoint, where it now serves me daily. It's a "hybrid" database, in the sense that the Front End is the original Access accdb, complete with all of the original VBA intact, while the Back End lives on SharePoint. 

A couple of posts back I &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/S04l0PB2rZ0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1316579470584703568/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1316579470584703568&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1316579470584703568?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1316579470584703568?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/S04l0PB2rZ0/you-can-get-there-from-here-migrating.html" title="Migrating Larger Tables to SharePoint" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-o0xReUXT1iI/TxjyCXVvvUI/AAAAAAAAALA/_iJU5MWsy4U/s72-c/SourceTableSQLServerLinked.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/01/you-can-get-there-from-here-migrating.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08DRHsyeSp7ImA9WhRUEk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1088128202577244442</id><published>2012-01-14T18:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-21T19:11:15.591-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-21T19:11:15.591-08:00</app:edited><title>Patching Up Relationships On SharePoint Migrations</title><summary type="html">
In my last previous blog post, I described one of the problems with exporting existing tables from Access or SQL Server to SharePoint. SharePoint bumps the existing Primary Key field out of its way and replaces it with a new one which SharePoint generates in its place. Here’s how that looks. In the second table in this screenshot, called “tblCustomer_SPBlog1, SharePoint has renamed the orginal “&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/6iHSUN_f3jw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1088128202577244442/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1088128202577244442&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1088128202577244442?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1088128202577244442?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/6iHSUN_f3jw/you-can-get-to-sharepoint-from.html" title="Patching Up Relationships On SharePoint Migrations" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-srdGbAMLsTs/TxIw9JtplsI/AAAAAAAAAII/GEhbBh15rXE/s72-c/BYEBYEPK.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2012/01/you-can-get-to-sharepoint-from.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08MRH0-eyp7ImA9WhRUEk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-6251282725187888379</id><published>2011-12-21T08:40:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2012-01-21T19:11:25.353-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-21T19:11:25.353-08:00</app:edited><title>Disappearing Primary Keys Notwithstanding, You Can Migrate to SharePoint</title><summary type="html">﻿﻿Recently, a poster at Utter Access asked for help moving Access tables from an existing database to SharePoint tables (or more accurately, to SharePoint lists). His goal was to link to those tables in a Hybrid Access database. One of the issues raised was the supposed limit on the number of records you can export. Fortunately, a couple of really knowledgeable people, Albert Kallal and Bonnie &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/rJ9rTAvQEfk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/6251282725187888379/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=6251282725187888379&amp;isPopup=true" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6251282725187888379?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6251282725187888379?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/rJ9rTAvQEfk/you-can-get-to-sharepoint-from-here.html" title="Disappearing Primary Keys Notwithstanding, You Can Migrate to SharePoint" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-X3Fe8SySeUg/TvFMqqFKRbI/AAAAAAAAAGk/fNEymgA4TtI/s72-c/SQLSERVERTable.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/12/you-can-get-to-sharepoint-from-here.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QASHY-cSp7ImA9WhRQFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1994393541498005867</id><published>2011-12-11T17:35:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2011-12-11T18:02:29.859-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-12-11T18:02:29.859-08:00</app:edited><title>"Microsoft Access in a SharePoint World" Is Available</title><summary type="html">I'm delighted to announce publication of a new, first-of-its-kind, book on Access 2010 and SharePoint 2010. It's been a long time in the writing, but we finally wrapped it up. 

My fellow MVPs, Ben Clothier (MS Access), Tim Runcie (MS Project) and I teamed up to write Microsoft Access in a SharePoint World. Tim’s company, Advisicon, is publishing the book.

For more details or to buy the book, &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/oWwkF9gHFbc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1994393541498005867/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1994393541498005867&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1994393541498005867?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1994393541498005867?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/oWwkF9gHFbc/microsoft-access-in-sharepoint-world-is.html" title="&quot;Microsoft Access in a SharePoint World&quot; Is Available" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/12/microsoft-access-in-sharepoint-world-is.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8MQXsyeip7ImA9WhdaFE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-6324706812196946794</id><published>2011-10-23T20:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-10-23T20:28:00.592-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-10-23T20:28:00.592-07:00</app:edited><title>How Much Does an Access Database Cost?</title><summary type="html">Lately I've been pondering the implications of some of the questions we get at Utter Access. It used to be that I worried more about giving the questioner an answer appropriate to their situation, but lately, I’ve also been asking myself, "How much will that technique cost?" 

Here's an example.

"I need to have users enter a value into a text box on a form. If that value is not found in the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/iW7eqFwQrbc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/6324706812196946794/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=6324706812196946794&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6324706812196946794?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6324706812196946794?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/iW7eqFwQrbc/how-much-does-access-database-cost.html" title="How Much Does an Access Database Cost?" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><georss:featurename>Newcastle, WA, USA</georss:featurename><georss:point>47.5389889 -122.1556769</georss:point><georss:box>47.5241064 -122.1898379 47.5538714 -122.1215159</georss:box><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/10/how-much-does-access-database-cost.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ck4ESX45cCp7ImA9WhdXEEo.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-8370356980180985195</id><published>2011-08-22T20:25:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-08-22T20:41:48.028-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-08-22T20:41:48.028-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Utter Access" /><title>Time Travel, or plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose</title><summary type="html">I've been posting at Utter Access since June of 2002. That's nine years of getting help and giving help. Utter Access is a very fine forum, widely acknowledged to be one of the premier sources of Access help on the web. I absolutely agree that it is, although I am very sure there are other fine forums, staffed by volunteers who are as knowledgeable and dedicated as my friends at UA. I just think &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/mVHGm-FjOe0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/8370356980180985195/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=8370356980180985195&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8370356980180985195?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8370356980180985195?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/mVHGm-FjOe0/time-travel-or-plus-ca-change-plus-cest.html" title="Time Travel, or plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/08/time-travel-or-plus-ca-change-plus-cest.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0IMRHc8cSp7ImA9WhRUEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1943407988266066233</id><published>2011-04-21T21:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2012-01-22T19:33:05.979-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2012-01-22T19:33:05.979-08:00</app:edited><title>Don't Be THAT Guy</title><summary type="html">
This one will be short. A few weeks ago I decided to update an old application I created a few years ago for a friend. It was created with Access 2002. The new version is in Access 2010 and it showcases a few 2010 specific features, as well as an updated table structure. I worked on it off and on over a couple of weeks. One night I was tweaking a form when Access threw an error, informing me it &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/sCjN8OPKXVM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1943407988266066233/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1943407988266066233&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1943407988266066233?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1943407988266066233?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/sCjN8OPKXVM/dont-be-that-guy_21.html" title="Don't Be THAT Guy" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-lkoFyM0gQ1Q/TbD7jVbFqlI/AAAAAAAAAEw/ANrG-KlKq50/s72-c/DeadCodeLrge.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/04/dont-be-that-guy_21.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A04MRn4yeyp7ImA9WhZSFU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-371979541049805417</id><published>2011-03-30T18:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-30T19:53:07.093-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-30T19:53:07.093-07:00</app:edited><title>Sometime I just want to be single, okay?</title><summary type="html">(Guest blog by Banana)On the surface, it appears that VBA does not like it very much when you want to have a Singleton class. Whenever I write a class module, which is kind of rare given the general patterns in Access/VBA development, it's almost inevitable I want a Singleton. The only reason it's a class in first place is because I need some variables declared WithEvents. We can't do that in a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/TpCag-vdx6s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/371979541049805417/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=371979541049805417&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/371979541049805417?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/371979541049805417?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/TpCag-vdx6s/sometime-i-just-want-to-be-single-okay.html" title="Sometime I just want to be single, okay?" /><author><name>Banana</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/03/sometime-i-just-want-to-be-single-okay.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQGR3c8eyp7ImA9WhZTF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1571945667551189413</id><published>2011-03-20T12:07:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-03-21T22:05:26.973-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-03-21T22:05:26.973-07:00</app:edited><title>No, Excel is NOT a Database</title><summary type="html">So, what's got my dander up today? I’m glad you asked. 

Excel is NOT a database. You can't import Excel spreadsheets into Access and call that a database. You can't create "spreadsheets" directly in Access and call that a database. I wish more people understood that. It would make my blood pressure go down, probably down a lot.

Hold off on the Pitchforks and Torches, Please

Excel is a great &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/Ill0C7jzgI0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1571945667551189413/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1571945667551189413&amp;isPopup=true" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1571945667551189413?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1571945667551189413?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/Ill0C7jzgI0/no-excel-is-not-database.html" title="No, Excel is NOT a Database" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2011/03/no-excel-is-not-database.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUIMQn4zeip7ImA9Wx5UFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-6009145801351051830</id><published>2010-10-18T23:37:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-10-19T07:13:03.082-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-10-19T07:13:03.082-07:00</app:edited><title>New, New, New</title><summary type="html">Well. It's been an interesting 6 months.New job.New home.New book project.New Laptop (Rest in peace, worthy Dell Vostro).So I'm long over due for a new blog post.The last post is badly in need of a follow up, but that is going to have to wait a bit longer still--too much on my plate to do a decent job at the moment.My last work project was an enhancement to an Access/SQL Server database for a &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/gVb0rB0W8bo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/6009145801351051830/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=6009145801351051830&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6009145801351051830?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/6009145801351051830?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/gVb0rB0W8bo/new-new-new.html" title="New, New, New" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2010/10/new-new-new.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkIFRXc-cCp7ImA9WxBaGEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-4934924850816152205</id><published>2010-03-28T12:18:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-03-28T14:08:34.958-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-28T14:08:34.958-07:00</app:edited><title>A work in Progress and 64 Bit VBA</title><summary type="html">Recently, I revisited an Access demo I've been puttering around with for a while. In the process, I also had a great chance to take a stroll through the emerging information relating to 64 bit OS's and Access. The event that triggered this was moving this demo into Access 2010 (32 bit flavor) running on a 64 bit OS (Win 7). It didn't work, which called for some changes in API calls to handle the &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/p6BgOmGhXIs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/4934924850816152205/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=4934924850816152205&amp;isPopup=true" title="5 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/4934924850816152205?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/4934924850816152205?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/p6BgOmGhXIs/work-in-progress-and-64-bit-vba.html" title="A work in Progress and 64 Bit VBA" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2010/03/work-in-progress-and-64-bit-vba.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CE8DRnczeCp7ImA9WxBbFkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-5077198469936384858</id><published>2010-03-14T16:23:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-03-14T17:27:57.980-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-14T17:27:57.980-07:00</app:edited><title>Making A "DUAL" Table</title><summary type="html">My friend, Banana, likes to push the envelope sometimes. He's a first class developer who's always trying out new ideas. So it was no surprise to me when he asked me if I knew what a "DUAL Table" was. I figured I was in for another trip past the edge of my existing knowledge and I was not wrong.It's More Than Just a Two-FerTurns out that a DUAL table is a feature in Oracle. I won't waste space &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/o68snuvj1rI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/5077198469936384858/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=5077198469936384858&amp;isPopup=true" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/5077198469936384858?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/5077198469936384858?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/o68snuvj1rI/making-dual-table.html" title="Making A &quot;DUAL&quot; Table" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2010/03/making-dual-table.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak4NQ3k-fyp7ImA9WxBbFk0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-1739984923225140447</id><published>2010-03-14T16:22:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-03-14T16:23:12.757-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-14T16:23:12.757-07:00</app:edited><title>What is May 12th, 2010?</title><summary type="html">Answer: The date on which Office 2010 will officially be released.No, I can't wait.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/SL674qHUpEw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/1739984923225140447/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=1739984923225140447&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1739984923225140447?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/1739984923225140447?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/SL674qHUpEw/what-is-may-12th-2010.html" title="What is May 12th, 2010?" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2010/03/what-is-may-12th-2010.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DU4EQns_cCp7ImA9WxBUEU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-8343144150235664005</id><published>2010-02-25T11:50:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-25T11:58:23.548-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-25T11:58:23.548-08:00</app:edited><title>Access Wiki</title><summary type="html">The big news this week is that Utter Access has added a Wiki to its portfolio. The Utter Access forums, which remains the number one Access help site on the internet, also has a new look and new features.http://www.utteraccess.com/http://www.utteraccess.com/wiki/index.php/Main_PageThe best just keeps on getting better.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/tBQkCd-4_AQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/8343144150235664005/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=8343144150235664005&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8343144150235664005?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/8343144150235664005?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/tBQkCd-4_AQ/access-wiki.html" title="Access Wiki" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2010/02/access-wiki.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEEHRX46eyp7ImA9WxNaFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-4951357329424746841</id><published>2009-11-29T21:11:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-29T22:30:34.013-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-29T22:30:34.013-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Access" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Table Driven Properties" /><title>Now, Where Did THAT Come From?</title><summary type="html">I recently started thinking about setting application properties a little differently than I had been. Well, actually, it's been a while since I really gave it much thought at all, to be honest. A long time ago, I created a module with default constants like "MBTitle" and "AppTitle", and started importing it into new accdbs or mdbs. Then I'd edit the values for the new database. It works, but it &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/Z9NA661pcy8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/4951357329424746841/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=4951357329424746841&amp;isPopup=true" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/4951357329424746841?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/4951357329424746841?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/Z9NA661pcy8/now-where-did-that-come-from.html" title="Now, Where Did THAT Come From?" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_k-iWtT3HxjA/SxNcW-vRFiI/AAAAAAAAAB8/xW1zyJOPif0/s72-c/GPGOnAccess0000.png" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2009/11/now-where-did-that-come-from.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMCQns7cSp7ImA9WxNaFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-2490872897285300406</id><published>2009-11-08T09:27:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-29T22:27:43.509-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-29T22:27:43.509-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Access" /><title>Access on SharePoint</title><summary type="html">Are We There Yet?Actually, I think so. I really do. We still have to unload the car and carry a few bags and boxes into the house, but we're certainly sitting in the driveway.I've done up a small demo with MS Access 2010 (beta) running on the SharePoint 2010 (beta) and shown it to a few folks. It runs on my employer's site, so I can't publish the URL publically, unfortunately. Still waiting for a&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/uf1etsCQC2Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/2490872897285300406/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=2490872897285300406&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2490872897285300406?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/2490872897285300406?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/uf1etsCQC2Q/access-on-sharepoint.html" title="Access on SharePoint" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2009/11/access-on-sharepoint.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMCQns7cSp7ImA9WxNaFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1939941293002854842.post-7959196984374792343</id><published>2009-10-11T19:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-11-29T22:27:43.509-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-29T22:27:43.509-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Access" /><title>And Now For Something (Almost) Completely Different</title><summary type="html">I have a guest blogger today. Ben Clothier has agreed to let me post this article he recently wrote. Ben is an MS Access MVP as well as being a some-time colleague and full-time friend.You'll find more of his excellent posts at Utter Access and at Access Word Forums.Ben writes on the use of Parameterized Queries to achieve the results I've recently described with other techniques involving &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnAccess/~4/7sRrPvpEHBc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/feeds/7959196984374792343/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1939941293002854842&amp;postID=7959196984374792343&amp;isPopup=true" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/7959196984374792343?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/1939941293002854842/posts/default/7959196984374792343?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnAccess/~3/7sRrPvpEHBc/and-now-for-something-completely.html" title="And Now For Something (Almost) Completely Different" /><author><name>Grover Park George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/14873826635955561997</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="26" height="32" src="http://www.gpcdata.com/images/grhtwo.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://gpgonaccess.blogspot.com/2009/10/and-now-for-something-completely.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
