<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xml:base="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/ongoing.atom" xml:lang="en-us">
 <title>ongoing by Tim Bray</title>
 
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/</id>
 <link href="./" />
 
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="101" href="/home/tbray.org/www/html/ongoing/comments.atom" />
 <logo>rsslogo.jpg</logo>
 <icon>/favicon.ico</icon>
 <updated>2013-05-19T19:11:01-07:00</updated>
 <author><name>Tim Bray</name></author>
 <subtitle>ongoing fragmented essay by Tim Bray</subtitle>
 <rights>All content written by Tim Bray and photos by Tim Bray Copyright Tim Bray, some rights reserved, see /ongoing/misc/Copyright</rights>
 <generator uri="/misc/Colophon">Generated from XML source code using Perl, Expat, Emacs, Mysql, Ruby, Java, and ImageMagick.  Industrial-strength technology, baby.</generator>

<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Ongoing" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="ongoing" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/18/">
 <title>IO in the Rearview</title>
 <link href="IO-Rearview" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="5" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="IO-Rearview#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/18/IO-Rearview</id>
 <published>2013-05-18T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-19T15:43:52-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology/Web" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Web" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business/Google" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Google" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I enjoyed it more than any other so far. More APIs, less hardware. More sessions, each shorter.  One keynote.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I enjoyed it more than any other so far. More APIs, less hardware.
More sessions, each shorter.  One keynote.</p>
<h2 id="p-5">Scale</h2>
<p>IO has been at Moscone West, its attendance thus capped at
five-thousand-and-change people, for a while now.  I predict it stays that
way.  Yeah, it sells out instantly and we could probably draw five times that
number.  All this is true of Apple’s WWDC too; In 
<a href="http://www.randsinrepose.com/archives/2013/05/19/unknowable.html">Unknowable</a>,
Rands says 
smart things about the advantages of smaller size.</p>
<img src="DSCF3504.png" alt="The crowd at Google IO 2013" />
<div class="caption"><p>Moscone West, about as crowded as it’s legally
possible for it to be, and it’s still a pretty decent space.</p></div>
<p>But there’s another factor; it’s really hard to grow much over 5-6K
because then you don’t fit in Moscone West, which is a reasonably light, airy,
pleasant space; see above.  The only alternative that I know of is Moscone
North/South, which is sort of a grungy basement shithole, and an insanely
bigger investment of cash and work for whoever’s putting the show on.</p>
<p>If someone came along and built a nice venue that could handle say, 10K,
without turning attendees into troglodytes, I bet we and Apple would both give
it a serious look.  For now though, I’d be surprised if things change much.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">What Larry Said</h2>
<p>The keynote surprise was a walk-on from Larry Page, which by the way takes
a certain amount of courage for a guy with
<a href="https://plus.google.com/106189723444098348646/posts/aqy6DvvLJY1">voice
problems</a>.  His speech drew a certain amount of eye-rolling, but I can
testify that it wasn’t put on for the occasion; that’s just what he sounds
like when he’s speaking internally to Googlers.</p>
<p>I think
<a href="http://daringfireball.net/2013/05/google_versus">John Gruber’s
pushback</a> mostly misses the mark. First off, Larry is obviously right that
the Net biz isn’t zero-sum.  Look, for example, at iOS and Android clawing
each other ferociously for market share; who’s winning depends on what
measures you use, but the key thing is that no matter how you measure, both
sides are growing and growing fast.  And I’ll totally unsurprised if one of
Microsoft or BlackBerry or Mozilla or someone nobody’s watching yet gets a
spot on that mobile-software growth curve.</p>
<img src="DSCF3439.png" alt="The bicycle corral at Google IO 2013" />
<div class="caption"><p>The bicycle corral.  It was busy every day.</p></div>
<p>Also, more or less all growth is by accretion. There were tablets from
Microsoft five years before the iPad; MapQuest was on the Web a decade
before Google Maps got interesting; the list of examples is endless.</p>
<p>Great things that didn’t previously exist don’t burst like Athena from some
deity’s forehead, but grow by relentless layering-on of improvements and
additions; eventually this produces something so much better and different
that it’s in effect qualitatively new.</p>
<img src="DSCF3506.png" alt="A Pixel’s innards" />
<div class="caption"><p>Inside a Chromebook Pixel.</p></div>
<h2 id="p-2">What I Said</h2>
<p>My speech, an overview of Identity tech, was pretty rough. Literally 10
minutes before showtime, my Keynote preso corrupted itself and wouldn’t play.
I managed to export it as PDF so the audience could see it, minus the nifty
animations and transitions, but I couldn’t see my speaker notes. Fortunately I
remembered most of the 50 minutes’ worth of material, but there’s a whole lot
of hemming and hawing and I am totally unrelaxed.</p>
<p>The talk is
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uZfHF4tQmQE">up on YouTube</a>, but I
don’t recommend it for anyone who reads this space, because I’ll eventually
work through all the material here in a probably-more-coherent form.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">The Girl/Boy Thing</h2>
<p>IO, like every other tech gathering, suffers from horrible gender
imbalance. I don’t know what to do about it but I don’t think it’s
appropriate to ignore, and I’ll keep highlighting it as long as I keep seeing
it.</p>
<p>By the way, I had sort of thought there was not much new to be said about
high-tech gender tension, but I was wrong; I recommend
<a href="http://thehawkeyeinitiative.com/post/50432219744/special-guest-edition-the-hawkeye-initiative-irl">The Hawkeye Initiative IRL!</a>
by “K2” and
<a href="http://sushee.no-ip.org/opensourceisnotawarzone.txt">Open Source Is Not A Warzone. Not Every Man Is A Dick</a>
by a girl-Perl-geek collective.  I don’t 100% agree with everything they
say, but any new contribution to this conversation is obviously A Good Thing.</p>
<img src="DSCF3492.png" alt="Geek at Google IO 2013" />
<div class="caption"><p>A geek.</p></div>
<h2 id="p-6">My Tribe</h2>
<p>That gender problem aside, IO left me proud to be a Net nerd. The people
at IO are eclectic, open-hearted, loud-voiced; they are Burning-Man hippies,
calculating entrepreneurs, concurrency obsessives, amateur opera singers; they
come from everywhere, in all colors. (Those that are American
include more or less no Republicans, because one thing that’s not cool among
us is the celebration of ignorance.)  I love them.  There’s nothing I’d rather
do.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/17/">
 <title>Ingress Chase Scene</title>
 <link href="Ingress-Move" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="1" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Ingress-Move#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/17/Ingress-Move</id>
 <published>2013-05-17T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-18T16:20:02-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Life Online" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Life Online" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I hadn’t been out to play in a long time, but I heard of a cross-faction event at IO, and I’d never done one of those. It got way out into crazy-space; Even non-players might enjoy the story.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I hadn’t been out to play in a long time, but I heard of a cross-faction
event at IO, and I’d never done one of those.
It got way out into crazy-space; Even non-players might enjoy the story.</p>
<p>Previously in this series:
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2012/12/08/Ingress">Ingress</a>,
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/01/09/Things-about-Ingress">Things About
Ingress</a>, 
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/01/29/Ingress-Month-3">Ingress, Month 3</a>,
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/02/06/Improving-Ingress">Ingress Weekly</a>, 
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/03/30/Ingress">Ingress Tourism</a>, and
<a href="http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/21/Advanced-Ingress">Advanced
Ingress</a>.
</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Steve at the Diamond</h2>
<p>My Tuesday plane to San Fran was late so I missed the geek dinners.
Restless, I checked the Ingress map and discovered there was a
major level-8-portal farm down around the ballpark.  Thus a late-evening
walk round the diamond by the bay, admiring the waves’ twinkles.</p>
<p>I ran into a few local players farming away, notably this one guy whom I’ll
call “SteveMcQ” even though that’s not his real or in-game name. He’s a
high-energy fast-talking Hong-Kong-American who 
really loves his Ingress. We hung out, chatted, strolled, loaded up on virtual
goodies.</p> 
<h2 id="p-2">At IO</h2>
<p>There was an Ingress booth where eager young staffers dealt out
schwag.  They had you fire up the game to verify your level, and I got
the only in-real-life compliment I’ll ever get from an in-real-life young woman
for video-game achievement; that and a cheesy level-8 T-shirt, and a
blue Resistance badge with flashing LEDs.  Faintly ludicrous, but
cheerful.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">Roll the Cameras</h2>
<p><a href="https://plus.google.com/events/cct0tpgkbvrfe7gf3f8403i68d0">Operation Bowstring</a>
was a cross-faction event organized by Niantic for IO attendees and interested
local players. There was one big central portal and
a dozen or so others you could win points for your faction by holding or
enclosing at 3 checkpoints: 7:30, 8:00, and 8:30 PM.</p>
<p>My faction didn’t organize much, just a brief gathering on a SoMa
sidewalk. SteveMcQ showed up
and decided I should join him to contend for a portal at the
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palace_of_Fine_Arts">Palace of Fine
Arts</a>.  “I drive, let’s go!” he said. Except
for, the Palace is way over at the other side of San Francisco, it was already
after 7, and the third L8 in our party, a nice San Franciscan woman playing as
“thecatspaws”, was missing. We found the car, we 
found thecatspaws, and SteveMcQ <em>put the hammer down</em>.</p>
<p>Suddenly I was in 
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2wD64vlMxLA">the chase scene from
Bullitt</a>.  OK, I exaggerate; SteveMcQ is a terrific driver and got us there
in the <em>absolute minimum</em> 
possible elapsed time without actually breaking laws. A police officer might
have wanted to dispute some of the finer points, but we didn’t see any of
those.  All the while 
talking double-time Ingress shop in Cantonese English, frequently waving both
hands in the air.  If you’re gonna joyride
like a complete fucking madman across a major American city, I think San Fran’s
a good choice.</p>
<p>The Palace portal was held by the Enlightened. You can’t drive
there; it’s in the middle of a green space the
other side of a big pond from the nearest street.
thecatspaws’ phone locked up just as we got close; so SteveMcQ jerked to a stop in the
middle of the street at 7:27.
He yelled at her “You park it, we go!” 
and we hit the ground running.</p>
<img src="DSCF3527.png" alt="The Palace of Fine Arts in San Francisco" />
<div class="caption"><p>The Palace of Fine Arts. It’s pretty, I recommend a visit.</p></div>
<p>SteveMcQ and I ran like hell through the beautifully-manicured grounds, 
leaping hedges, terrifying poodles, banking around corners.  For the last
hundred yards we had our Androids out, firing off L8 bursters fast as we
could punch the screen.</p>
<p>The other side was there but, not having seen any of us, had relaxed a
bit.  I will long treasure the look on the face of Enlightened agent
“mercurio” when SteveMcQ and I came hurtling through the Palace arches at
7:29:30 
or so, resonators smashing left and right.  Later, we found out that
mercurio’s app had locked up too, just a moment before.  So with that and the
element of surprise, even though there
were three of them to two of us, we held the portal at the crucial moment,
scoring a point for our team.</p>
<p>Then I couldn’t help laughing out loud between gasps for breath.  It
was impossible not to be madly exuberant.</p>
<p>The next hour was pleasant, with time between bouts for
sandwich-grabbing and picture-taking; it’s a nice bit of San Fran.
Also, we won both the 8:00 and 8:30PM rematches,
the second I think mostly on luck, the third because they 
tried to fake us out and build a field round the portal. Once we’d scotched
that, they hadn’t time for a serious attack.</p>
<p>Then we drove back cross town for the finale at 
“Cupid’s Arch”, that big bow-and-arrows sculpture by the Embarcadero, where our
side was comprehensively crushed by the better-organized opposition; 
SteveMcQ and thecatspaws and I 
brought in three of the miserable <s>eight</s> nine Resistance points.</p>
<p>Still, it
was cool being out by the bay with hundreds of nerds, nearly everyone badged
in flashing green or blue.  Then everyone went off to a bar; it was OK but I
got claustrophobic and left, found another bar where I talked with random IO
geeks about OAuth and queuing systems.</p>
<p>Ingress, it can be serious fun.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/16/">
 <title>Fun at IO</title>
 <link href="Fun-at-IO" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="0" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Fun-at-IO#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/16/Fun-at-IO</id>
 <published>2013-05-16T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-17T14:58:31-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business/Google" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Google" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Places/San Francisco" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Places" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="San Francisco" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">There is a conscious effort to make Google IO not just an information-dense environment, but a party.  I joined in the fun for all three evenings I was free in San Fran.  This included one photo-walk, one rock &amp; roll performance, and one cross-faction Ingress event.  Here are words and pictures.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>There is a conscious effort to make Google IO not just an information-dense
environment, but a party.  I joined in the fun for all three evenings I was
free in San Fran.  This included one photo-walk, one rock &amp; roll performance, and one cross-faction Ingress event.  Here are words and pictures.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Photo Walk</h2>
<p>As in, the
<a href="https://plus.google.com/events/cm6l1qj16ktg9f8sv69ep7b2rhk">Google+
San Francisco PhotoWalk with Thomas and Trey</a>, where T&amp;T are short for
<a href="http://thomashawk.com/">Thomas Hawk</a> and
<a href="http://www.stuckincustoms.com/trey-ratcliff/">Trey Ratcliff</a>, two
photogs of renown at least on G+.</p>
<p>Over a thousand people signed up and a few hundred actually turned up. I
heard 400-ish which, if true, means that each
<a href="https://plus.google.com/events/gallery/cm6l1qj16ktg9f8sv69ep7b2rhk">uploaded ten photos</a>, more or
less.   The
camera ecosystem seems vigorous, the photwalkers wielding everything from
exotic monsters in the 
<a href="http://www.alpa.ch/">Alpa</a> and
<a href="http://www.phaseone.com/">Phase One</a> flavors to the pocket
computers that most actual photos are taken with these days. Here’s one of
those:</p>
<img src="DSCF3409.png" alt="Picture-talking on a San Francisco PhotoWalk" />
<p>But wow, were there ever a lot of mirrorlesses in evidence.</p>
<p>While I took away a few general-purpose downtown-San-Francisco shots, I
thought the most interesting local subjects were the photographers at work,
for example here:</p>
<img src="DSCF3401.png" alt="Street guitarist being photographed" />
<p>After about 800 pictures of this grizzled rocker had been taken I laid a
couple bucks on him and I hope lots of other photogs did too.</p>
<p>Is this a great-looking photographer or what?</p>
<img src="DSCF3417.png" alt="Photographer on a San Francisco PhotoWalk" />
<p>This was my first-ever PhotoWalk and I’d like to try it again, on a smaller
scale.</p>
<h2 id="p-2">Rock and Roll</h2>
<p>I strolled into the Google IO after-hours party not knowing who was going
to be playing — rumor had suggested Daft Punk — and thought, as I walked in,
“that looks like Billy Idol”; and so it was.</p>
<img src="DSCF3476.png" alt="Billy Idol at Google IO" />
<p>Billy’s in good shape and moves well even if the years haven’t been
kind to his face.  I have a lot of respect for straight-ahead hard rock played
unironically and well; some fools think that’s an easy thing to do. Billy’s
band did, and while a few of the tracks were flat, everyone’s gotta love the
chestnuts like <cite>White Wedding</cite> and <cite>Mony Mony</cite>.</p>
<p>And then they played <cite>LA Woman</cite>. I’ve always loved that song
for its loping rhythms and chromatic crescendos and genuine menace,
but (I realized) had never heard it played live by a competent rock band. I am
sincerely grateful to Billy and the 
band for doing it up just fine.</p>
<img src="DSCF3481.png" alt="Billy Idle at Google IO" />
<p>When a rocker’s playing a corporate gig I guess they have to throw in a few
words for the crowd to illustrate that they know where they are.  So Billy
said something along the lines of “Hope you guys go out there and have good
luck with your apps. Some of the money I get for doing this will probably go
into them.  Isn’t it great to do the thing you most love to do and get paid
for it?” It is! I was actually sort of touched.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">Ingress</h2>
<p>My first ever
<a href="https://plus.google.com/events/cct0tpgkbvrfe7gf3f8403i68d0">Ingress
cross-faction event</a>. Sixteen or so portals scattered round San Francisco
were designated as special and the factions could score by enfielding or
owning them.</p>
<p>My own Resistance faction wasn’t remotely organized and so we got our butts
kicked; but, as usual with Ingress, I saw some places I wouldn’t have
otherwise seen, and met some people I wouldn’t have otherwise met.</p>
<p>My own little role, admittedly in a side-show, was wildly entertaining and
I’ll write it up separately.  Here are a couple pictures from the closing
ceremony down by the Bay Bridge, processed into what I fondly hope is a
vaguely Ingress-y style.</p>
<p>Here, a boat pulls up to the pier to deliver a couple satchels-full of
prize goodies.</p>
<img src="DSCF3530.png" alt="Ingress cross-faction meetup prize delivery" />
<p>It was kind of nice, if chilly, to be down by the bay with this
wildly-random assortment, both IO geeks and local San Fran Ingress
nerds.  Thanks to Niantic for a decent night out.</p>
<img src="DSCF3536.png" alt="I’m thinking “Virtual Light”" />
<p>Yes, in between the fun, meaningful technology happened and there’s more to
come; but the pictures aren’t as good.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/08/">
 <title>Springies</title>
 <link href="Springies" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="0" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Springies#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/08/Springies</id>
 <published>2013-05-08T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-08T21:29:20-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Garden" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Garden" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I used to run lots of flower pix; it was almost a trademark for this blog in its early days.  Their absence hasn’t been a matter of policy; whatever mental subsystem it is that pulls the camera up to the eye operates several levels below the one where I think about things.  But the sun was just right after supper tonight.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I used to run lots of flower pix; it was almost a trademark for this blog
in its early days.  Their absence hasn’t been a matter of policy; whatever
mental subsystem it is that pulls the camera up to the eye operates several
levels below the one where I think about things.  But the sun was just right
after supper tonight.</p>
<p>From top to bottom: Poppies, the
<i>Rugosa</i> that’s winning this year’s Rose Race, and a <i>Lonicera
ciliosa</i> Honeysuckle. Nothing I can say can add much.</p>
<img src="DSCF3337.png" alt="Welsh poppies and their shadows" />
<img src="DSCF3343.png" alt="Pink Rugosa rose blossom" />
<img src="DSCF3346.png" alt="Lonicera Ciliosa" />
<p>While on the subject of flowers: This spring in my neighborhood, many of
the women are wearing simple dresses in floral prints, mostly lightweight stuff
with a bit of swing and float to it.  There are no words for how good they
look; any more than with these blossoms.</p>
<p>Still enjoying my time with the Fujifilm X-E1 and (especially) the 35mm F1.4.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/06/">
 <title>Springtime Tab Sweep — The World</title>
 <link href="Tab-Sweep-World" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="3" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Tab-Sweep-World#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/06/Tab-Sweep-World</id>
 <published>2013-05-06T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-06T21:49:13-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Politics" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Politics" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Environment" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Environment" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">The only unifying theme is that they’ve been building up in the browser for months, and are generally consistent with my worldview.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>The only unifying theme is that they’ve been building up in the browser for
months, and are generally consistent with my worldview.</p>
<h2 id="p-2">Why it’s OK to hate banks</h2>
<p>From <cite>The Economist</cite>,
<a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/02/equity-capital-requirements?fsrc=rss">The people versus the bankers</a>,
an approachable, quantitative discussion of why banking is systemically
broken, and why it would be good for society to inflict severe financial pain
on bankers.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Who you are and where you come from</h2>
<p>From <cite>Pacific Standard</cite> magazine, of which I know nothing, Ethan
Watters writes
<a href="http://www.psmag.com/magazines/pacific-standard-cover-story/joe-henrich-weird-ultimatum-game-shaking-up-psychology-economics-53135/">We Aren’t the World</a>,
in which it’s revealed that peoples’ cultural roots influence their
perceptions and behaviors, um, <i>radically</i> (etymology joke there), which
isn’t surprising, and that quantitative social science has never really wired
in this apparently-an-axiom, which is.</p>
<h2 id="p-2">Unequal Urbanism</h2>
<p>Geoff Meggs is a leading light on Vancouver city council and a good blogger
too.  I read
<a href="http://www.geoffmeggs.ca/2013/03/09/would-a-high-tech-boom-hurt-or-help-reduce-vancouvers-inequality/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=would-a-high-tech-boom-hurt-or-help-reduce-vancouvers-inequality">Would a high tech boom hurt or help reduce Vancouver’s inequality?</a>
which referenced Richard Florida’s
<a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/jobs-and-economy/2013/01/more-losers-winners-americas-new-economic-geography/4465/">More Losers Than Winners in America's New Economic Geography</a>
and, from <cite>Urbanophile</cite>,
<a href="http://www.urbanophile.com/2013/02/03/is-urbanism-the-new-trickle-down-economics/">Is Urbanism the New Trickle-Down Economics?</a>
and
<a href="http://www.urbanophile.com/2010/05/02/failure-to-communicate-beyond-starbucks-urbanism/">Failure to Communicate: Beyond Starbucks Urbanism</a>.</p>
<p>Hmf; I’d sort of uncritically thought that a reasonably well-working city
should be an engine of progress, by and large, but the data don’t seem to
support that.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">Feeds</h2>
<p>In these days of <i>Readerdammerung</i> there is fresh new thinking on this
topic. John Battelle offers
<a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/2013/03/who-owns-the-right-to-filter-your-feed.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+JohnBattellesSearchblog+%28John+Battelle%27s+Searchblog%29">Who owns the right to filter your feed?</a>
in which he feels helpless before the Twitter torrent and casts about for
strategies to deal with it. I think he’s missing the point, because the
torrent’s eddies always bring the important stuff back to me; but John is
always interesting.</p>
<h2 id="p-4">Pomobilly</h2>
<p>As practiced by
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=willy+moon">Willy
Moon</a>, of whom I’d known nothing, but I think I’ll have to check him
out. What a voice!</p>
<h2 id="p-5">Serious Schneier</h2>
<p>Bruce is iconic of course, and usually what he writes gets the attention it
deserves, but I thought that
<a href="http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2013/03/our_internet_su.html">Our Internet Surveillance State</a>
should have lit up more neurons than it apparently did. I’m not sure I agree
with all of it, but it’s an energizing read. We need
Mr Schneier.</p>
<h2 id="p-6">Sunlight!</h2>
<p>For some reason this isn’t a news story, but the efficiency of
solar energy generation has been increasing steadily for some years now and
apparently isn’t slowing down. I have
repeatedly heard 14%-per-annum as a typical estimate of recent growth, and
while those aren’t Moore’s-law numbers, they’re gonna change the world in not
too many years no matter how cheap fracked natural gas gets.  Juan Cole, who
usually covers Mideast politics, does a roundup in
<a href="http://www.juancole.com/2013/05/incredible-shrinking-projects.html">The Incredible Shrinking Cost of Solar Energy Drives Mega-Projects around the World</a>
and yeah, smells big to me.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/06/">
 <title>Springtime Tab Sweep — Tech</title>
 <link href="Tab-Sweep-Tech" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="5" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Tab-Sweep-Tech#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/06/Tab-Sweep-Tech</id>
 <published>2013-05-06T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-06T21:47:36-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology/Web" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Web" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology/Software" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Software" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Ouch, some of these tabs are <em>old</em>.  Unifying theme: none.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Ouch, some of these tabs are <em>old</em>.  Unifying theme: none.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Corroding Style Sheets</h2>
<p>Liking the look of
<a href="http://learnboost.github.io/stylus/">Stylus</a>. All these
tantalizing alternatives when what we really want is to take the ship up and
nuke CSS from orbit.</p>
<h2 id="p-9">Wisdom</h2>
<p>From <cite>CACM</cite>,
<a href="http://m.cacm.acm.org/magazines/2013/2/160173-the-tail-at-scale/fulltext">The
Tail at Scale</a> by Jeff Dean and Luiz André Barroso. Maybe the deepest
thinking about large-system performance characteristics you’re apt to read in
any given year.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">Git Joy</h2>
<p>Both good:
<a href="http://pcottle.github.io/learnGitBranching/">LearnGitBranching</a>
and
<a href="http://stevelosh.com/blog/2013/04/git-koans/">Git Koans</a>.</p>
<h2 id="p-4">Emacs Joy</h2>
<p><a href="http://emacsrocks.com/e13.html">Multiple-cursor</a> madness.
“And, it’s fun!” Eek.</p>
<h2 id="p-7">Mongo Joy</h2>
<p>Specifically,
<a href="https://blog.gregbrockman.com/2012/05/high-availability-with-mongodb-for-fun-and-profit/">High
Availability with MongoDB for Fun and Profit</a>.  I haven’t built a
high-volume site in some years, and while I’ve not missed it that much, I
would like a chance to play with some of the new database tech.  I’m relaying
this not because I think Mongo Is The One, but just because the whole
postrelational space continues to be super-interesting.</p>
<h2 id="p-8">Web Joy</h2>
<p>I don’t know if the Paul Ford who wrote this is
<a href="http://www.ftrain.com/">that Paul Ford</a>, but
<a href="http://www.wired.com/magazine/2013/04/http/all/1">Meet the Web’s
Operating System: HTTP</a> is a fine piece of work. Everyone knows that HTTP
is at the center of everything and it’s still, by any sane measure,
underappreciated.</p>
<p>In the center of that HTTP-powered ecosystem lives Pamela Fox, currently in 
the trenches at Coursera, who is for my money one of the most interesting
writers at the Web coalface. 
<a href="http://blog.pamelafox.org/2013/05/frontend-architectures-server-side-html.html">Server-side HTML vs. JS Widgets vs. Single-Page Web Apps</a>
is well-described by its title, and who doesn’t care about that stuff?
Recommended.</p>

</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/05/02/">
 <title>Rock and Roll Story</title>
 <link href="Blues-Highway-Blues" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="1" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Blues-Highway-Blues#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/05/02/Blues-Highway-Blues</id>
 <published>2013-05-02T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-05-03T00:16:51-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Books" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Books" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I just finished reading <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1612183530/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1612183530&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=ongoing-20">Blues Highway Blues</a> by <a href="http://www.eyreprice.net/">Eyre Price</a>, which is said to be one of a series called <cite>Crossroads Thrillers</cite>. If you like either American music or crime fiction, you might like this. If you like both, your chances are pretty high.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I just finished reading
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1612183530/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1612183530&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=ongoing-20">Blues
Highway Blues</a> by
<a href="http://www.eyreprice.net/">Eyre Price</a>, which is said to be one of
a series called <cite>Crossroads Thrillers</cite>. If you like either American
music or crime fiction, you might like this. If you like both, your chances
are pretty high.</p>
<img src="Blues-highway-blues-cover.png" class="inline" alt="Blues Highway Blues" />
<p>You might want to visit Price’s site linked under his name there; it’s
somewhat unique, which is getting hard to be on the Web these days. As of May
2013, 
<a href="http://www.eyreprice.net/Writing.html">his description</a> of
<cite>Blues Highway Blues</cite> is perfectly accurate; I can’t improve on it,
plus it comes with the audio of one of the songs in the book.  Go have
a look.</p>
<p>So, this novel has vaguely-Elmore-Leonard-flavored (that’s a compliment)
villains, violence painted in comic-book colors (meh),
lots of American-heartland ambiance (good), and immense pop-music erudition
(good) but with a bit of recourse to cheap mythology: Crossroads, Atibon, and
so on.</p>
<p>Now, I enjoyed the gleeful insertion of famous rock
lyrics and rock 
people into the narrative, but maybe not everyone would. Example: Billy
Gibbons finds the murder victim at the gas station. Example: At the Rock &amp;
Roll Hall of Fame in Detroit, our protagonists are involved in a smash &amp;
grab on the ashes of Alan Freed for reasons which are too complex to include
here; as you might expect, alarms go off and there are incoming uniformed
officials. Our hero calls out “We gotta get out of this place.” Hard not to
smile.</p>
<p>The plotting is sloppy in places, and a couple of characters who deserve
better are relegated to bit parts, but hey: You get to go on a road trip
around America with intensely colorful people, none of them wholly good, a few
really intensely bad, and you’ll learn something about roots &amp; rhythm
along the way.</p>
<p>Also, on top of being pretty good, it’s pretty cheap.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/29/">
 <title>Who Owns Your Pictures?</title>
 <link href="Picture-Rights" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="22" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Picture-Rights#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/29/Picture-Rights</id>
 <published>2013-04-29T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-29T14:47:23-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business/Publishing" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Publishing" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">People are claiming that a new British law is going to allow anyone to steal your online pictures and sell them and keep the money.  I think they’re mostly wrong about that law, but in the process of checking it out I ran across some bad behavior by social-media companies.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>People are claiming that a new British law is going to allow anyone to
steal your online pictures and sell them and keep the money.  I think they’re
mostly wrong about that law, but in the process of checking it out I ran
across some bad behavior by social-media companies.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">OMG they’re stealing my pretties!</h2>
<p>Someone linked, with a gasp of horror, to 
<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/">UK.Gov
passes Instagram Act: All your pics belong to everyone now</a> by Andrew
Orlowski.  I was prepared to blow it off because 
Orlowski is generally wrong about everything.  This is the man
who, back in 2004, referred to Wikipedians as “Khmer Rouge in nappies” and
has continued to get attention with lurid Internet contrarianism; which has
also worked for Jaron Lanier, Andrew Keen, and lately Evgeny Morozov.  The
Net is important enough that it needs sensible pushback, but we can do better
than these guys; I miss the days when Cliff Stoll was our best-known
naysayer.</p> 
<p>In this case it’s not just Andrew; the <cite>British Journal of
Photography</cite> is less alarmist in
<a href="http://www.bjp-online.com/british-journal-of-photography/news/2264780/controversial-copyright-framework-receives-royal-assent">Controversial copyright framework receives Royal Assent</a>,
but they’re still upset.</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Um, maybe not</h2>
<p>I haven’t read the British legislation, but what it apparently does is turn
people loose to re-use “orphan works”; those for which the creator’s and/or
rights-holders’ identities can’t be established.  I think this is sensible
enough; the tricky bit is in identifying the orphans.</p>
<p>Orlowski says “the user only needs to perform a ‘diligent search’” to
establish orphan-hood.  So, what’s the problem?  The things I publish online,
as for example here, tend to appear on pages which clearly assert they’re by
Tim Bray and that
<a href="/ongoing/misc/Copyright">certain rights are
reserved</a>.  So you wouldn’t have to be very diligent at all to establish
parenthood, at least in my case.</p>
<p>But then I read, in the <cite>BJP</cite> piece, “a large number of online
services, such as Facebook, Twitter and Flickr, strip the metadata from
uploaded images, creating millions of new orphan works each day” and I
thought, that <em>can’t</em> be right.  But it is, partly.</p>
<h2 id="p-3">Side trip: On Exif</h2>
<p>(Those of you who know about it can skip to the next section.)</p>
<p>It turns out
that electronic photograph files contain not just the pixels that form the
image, but also textual fields containing “metadata”, information about the
picture.  This is generally referred to as
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format">Exif</a>,
and it identifies some or all of: the camera, lens, date,
location (if there’s a GPS), size, aperture, and lots of other arcane
photographic details.
Plus, crucially, the name of the creator.</p>
<p>Exif is super-useful but also sort of a disorganized mess; there’s poor
compatibility 
between cameras and photo-editing packages.  For example, there are at least
three fields you can store authorship in: <i>Artist</i>, <i>By-line</i> and <i>Creator</i>.</p>
<p>There are plenty of tools that let you peek behind the pixels at the
Exif; most photo-editing packages will do this, and those of us who like the
old-school command-line approach use
<a href="http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/">ExifTool by Phil
Harvey</a>.</p>
<p>Most serious photographers arrange that when they publish an electronic
photo, the Exif data includes their name.  And getting back to the legal
discussion, a “diligent search” to determine who owns a picture would
obviously include checking out the Exif.</p>
<img src="DSCF3231.png" alt="A tugboat by night on the Fraser River in New Westminster" />
<h2 id="p-4">Metadata amputation</h2>
<p>I decided to check and see whether the <cite>BJP</cite> was right. So I
took the picture above, made sure it had my name in the Artist, By-line, and
Creator fields, and
<a href="https://twitter.com/timbray/status/328985929635221504">posted it to Twitter</a> using the Web interface. 
Then I downloaded the picture and checked the Exif, and sure enough Twitter
had nuked it.  There were 245 lines of Exif info going in, 58 coming out, and
none of them included my name.</p>
<p>In fact, Twitter
<a href="https://support.twitter.com/articles/20156423-posting-photos-on-twitter">clearly
states</a>
“We remove the Exif data upon upload. It is not available to those who view
your photo on Twitter.”</p>
<p>Now, I don’t think Twitter is evil.  And I suspect there are some fields
where this makes all sorts of sense. Lots of cameras and phones put GPS data
into pictures, without telling you, and I think it’s probably sensible to keep
from sharing your location with the entire world by default.</p>
<p>But I think removing the photo’s attribution is a serious mistake and
Twitter should fix it.</p>
<p>Also, it’s not just Twitter;
<a href="https://plus.google.com/104019628676287434335/posts">kora foto morgana</a>
pointed me at the
<a href="http://www.embeddedmetadata.org/">Embedded Metadata Manifesto</a>
site, which has done the digging and published
<a href="http://www.embeddedmetadata.org/social-media-test-results.php">Social
Media sites: photo metadata test results</a>.  
If they’re accurate, they reveal that Facebook, Flickr, Photobucket, 
and Twitter are losing attribution.  On the other hand, DropBox, Google+,
Pinterest, and Tumblr are doing the right thing.</p>
<h2 id="p-7">Oops, me too</h2>
<p>I checked the pictures right here on the blog and, uh, blush...  It turns
out that the
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/29/-big/DSCF3231.jpg.html">original
image</a> (what you see if you click on my picture) retains the attribution,
but the reduced drop-shadowed version just above lost it somewhere along the
pipeline through
<a href="http://www.imagemagick.org/script/index.php">ImageMagick</a> and then also
<a href="/ongoing/When/200x/2006/04/08/Picture-Frames">Framer</a>, which I
wrote.</p>
<p>Practically speaking it’s not a problem, because anyone who wants to use
one of my pictures will want to start with the larger version. But this does
show that it’s easy to get this wrong.  Doesn’t mean that Twitter should,
because some of the competition doesn’t, and they’re supposed to be pros.</p>
<h2 id="p-6">Summing up</h2>
<p>So yeah, Orlowski was wrong as usual; “diligent search” seems to me an
entirely reasonable way to determine whether any digital artifact is an orphan
or not, and even with missing Exif, the amount of diligence to required to
figure out if a picture in a Twitter stream is an orphan or not isn’t that
onerous.
And unleashing the digital orphans into the public commons is a good
thing.</p>
<p>On the other hand, certain well-known social sites are engaging in what
feels to me like egregiously abusive behavior in stripping authorship
information from works whose publishing they facilitate.</p>
<p>Please fix that up, Twitter and Flickr and Facebook. Or we might start
suspecting your motives.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/25/">
 <title>Johannesburg Noir</title>
 <link href="Zoo-City" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="7" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Zoo-City#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/25/Zoo-City</id>
 <published>2013-04-25T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-25T23:34:00-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Books" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Books" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0857662163/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0857662163&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=ongoing-20">Zoo City</a> is by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Beukes">Lauren Beukes</a>, published in 2010; she’s written another since then and I’ll make a point of reading it; which should be indicative.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0857662163/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0857662163&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=ongoing-20">Zoo
City</a> is by
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauren_Beukes">Lauren Beukes</a>,
published in 2010; she’s written another since then and I’ll make a point
of reading it; which should be indicative.</p>
<img src="Zoo-city-cover.png" class="inline" alt="Zoo City by Lauren Beukes" />
<p><i>[Background: I was looking at the bookshelf screens on my tablet
and realized I’ve read quite a few recently without sharing anything,
even though while none of them have been life-changing, a few are well worth
the price of an e-book.  This is bad behavior in a blogger, so I’ll try to run
a few short reviews and get caught up.]</i></p>
<p>This book is seriously nasty, and I mean that in the nicest possible way.
Poor people living hard-ass lives in surprising spaces, in and out of crime, with
considerable sex &amp; drugs &amp; rock &amp; roll, not to mention appalling
violence.  What’s not to like?</p>
<p>Well, some of the plot dots aren’t fully connected, like exactly what the
deal is with the convicts’ animals, and if that bothers you, well, then this
novel will too.  And a few times my suspension of disbelief in this particular
alternative future was screaming for mercy.  Also it’s maybe a little longer
than it really needs to be.</p>
<p>But hey, the characters are charmingly ambiguous and some aspects of this
future are 
pretty fascinating, and the story <em>moves right along</em>.  The horror gets
visceral but goes by so fast that you find yourself looking over your
figurative shoulder as you flip through the pages.  Well except for the
closing climax, which I think will make anyone gasp and blench a little.</p>
<p>Also, if you’re South African or otherwise know Johannesburg, you’ve
probably already read this, but if not really consider it.  
I’ve never been there but it drips with a
sense of the place, which given the quality of the writing and the fact that
Ms Beukes is South African, seems likely to be genuine.</p>
<p>Also, anyone who’s lived on the Net will be struck by the portrayal of our
heroine’s side-job as a 419-scam operative, and a very plausible walk-through of
what the successful closing of a 419 might just be like.  It must happen often
enough, or they wouldn’t be doing it.</p>
<p>Anyhow, it’s fun, it moves right along, and it’s not really like anything
else I’ve ever read.  So I suspect a lot of you would like it.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/22/">
 <title>HP7 — Draperies</title>
 <link href="Draperies" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="0" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Draperies#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/22/Draperies</id>
 <published>2013-04-22T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-22T17:55:46-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Places/Hawaii" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Places" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Hawaii" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">My <b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem is solved, or anyhow I’m out of Big-Island pictures I feel compelled to share.  These last two have absolutely nothing specific to the geography.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>My <b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem is solved, or anyhow I’m out of Big-Island
pictures I feel compelled to share.  These last two have absolutely nothing
specific to the geography.</p>
<p>This appeared by the pool at our resort in
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keauhou,_Hawaii">Keahou</a>. What you 
can’t see is the banner; it featured the
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triskelion">triskelion</a> which thought
was for the
Isle of Man; but it turned out to be the
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Sicily">Flag of Sicily</a>.
</p>
<img src="DSCF2677.png" alt="Setup for a Sicilian celebration" />
<p>And sure enough, a bunch of Sicilians showed up to eat and drink by the pool
by the ocean. Someone played guitar and they sang rousing Sicilian songs.
It was an afternoon thing, over by suppertime.  Don’t know if they were
Big-Island or vacationing Sicilians.</p>
<p>Now here’s something completely different; at a random beach on the West
coast of the Big Island.  I don’t know why they were sharing the sarong.</p>
<img src="DSCF2764.png" alt="Two women share a sarong" />
<p>That’s it for Hawaii, already feels a long time ago, except for the lava
walk; that memory will remain intense as long as my memory circuits work, I
think.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/21/">
 <title>Advanced Ingress</title>
 <link href="Advanced-Ingress" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="5" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Advanced-Ingress#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/21/Advanced-Ingress</id>
 <published>2013-04-21T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-21T17:40:20-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Life Online" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Life Online" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Wherever you go these days there are Level-8 players, and even the occasional L8 portal.  It’s a different game at that level. What may be my last piece on the subject; with a side-trip into BioShock Infinite.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Wherever you go these days there are Level-8 players, and even
the occasional L8 portal.  It’s a different game at that level. What may be my
last piece on the subject; with a side-trip into BioShock Infinite.</p>
<p>Previously in this series:
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2012/12/08/Ingress">Ingress</a>,
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/01/09/Things-about-Ingress">Things About
Ingress</a>, 
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/01/29/Ingress-Month-3">Ingress, Month 3</a>,
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/02/06/Improving-Ingress">Ingress Weekly</a>, and
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/03/30/Ingress">Ingress Tourism</a>.
</p>
<img src="L8.png" alt="I got to Ingress Level 8" class="inline" />
<p>A couple of our local enthusiasts got to L8 in less than 30 days’ play.  It
took me well over four months, and that’s with a few road-trips to places
oozing with portals;  I confess that when I
got real close to L8, I did put in a lengthy weekend afternoon driving
around 
to places in Vancouver to find juicy green fields to smash and relink.</p>
<h2 id="p-4">What Matters</h2>
<p>Someone who’s made it to L8 is likely fitter and
lighter than when they started, they’ve made some new friends, and
started to build a microculture.  In Vancouver, Resistance level-8 culture
centers on pubs with good chicken-wing specials; perhaps not what I would
have picked, but there you go.</p>
<p>You hear stories about spectacular Ingress
weight losses, which is a good thing; and also, to be fair, Ingress traffic
tickets.</p>
<h2 id="p-2">BioShock Infinite</h2>
<p>While on the subject of games... I kept hearing people talk about this one,
so thought the family should give it a try.
The graphics are beautiful, the “Vigors” (magic spells) are cool, the
arena is built with real imagination, but after less then ten hours, I’m
done.  There are no other people playing and I’m stuck
in my living room; why would I want to do that?</p>
<h2 id="p-1">Advanced Ingress Strategy</h2>
<p>Once you no longer care about leveling up, everything changes.  At the
moment there’s not much of an endgame, unless you’re in a neighborhood where
the Niantic people stage one of their events, or you organize your own.  But
let’s assume there’s going to be one.  If you want to be on the winning side
then, you need to have more high-level players than the other side. So what
matters more than anything else is recruiting new players and leveling them
up.  On that basis:</p>
<ul>
<li><p><em>Don’t</em> build big linked fields.  You’re taking away leveling
opportunities from your junior players and creating them
for the other side.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Do</em> build farms.  You can’t do anything without ammunition, and
so you need occasional access to clusters of L7 and L8 portals.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Don’t</em> try to play defense. Ingress is ludicrously tilted in
favor of the attacking player — an L6 can take down any portal in the game,
and an L8 can tear up a whole neighborhood in no time at all.</p>
<p>There have been recent changes to the game that might make defense a
little less impossible, but for the time being, it’s not a good use of your
time or resources.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Do</em> make pop-up farms.  The consequence of the last two points
is that you need to get groups of high-level players together, upgrade a bunch
of portals clustered in a small area, and farm them all dry, ideally before
the other side arrives to smash.  In Vancouver this is done with the help of
chicken wings.</p>
<p>We also had  a suburb a half-hour’s easy drive away with a
compact riverfront downtown bulging with portals, and a couple of our more
fanatical players lived there. We managed to keep L8’s up
for days and days there, and for quite a while had the other side outgunned as
a consequence. But it seems they’ve caught on, so I guess it’s back to
pop-ups.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Don’t</em> capture portals. If you’re attacking an enemy L7, don’t
capture it or even turn it grey. Leave it in the opposition’s hands, but with
almost all the portals destroyed and the rest weakened. That way, you’re not
leaving the fat first-resonator bonus on the table for the other side.</p>
<p>Unless, of course, there’s a lower-level player from your faction somewhere
not too far away.  In which case...</p></li>
<li><p><em>Do</em> offer smash/key service.  L8 players should be available,
when one of your lower-level players is around, to come out, weaken or smash
the opposition portals, and load the junior up with portal keys, so they can
capture and deploy and link.</p></li>
<li><p><em>Don’t</em> let the other side have farms. My neighborhood is
currently full of opposition portals and I just don’t care.  But I and our
other L8’s keep our eyes open for any of them
hitting L7, and we’re pretty good at cleaning them up PDQ when that
happens.</p></li>
</ul>
<h2 id="p-3">How Big Is It?</h2>
<p>A lot of people are playing; somewhere over 500 just here in Vancouver. But
the rate of growth has slowed, I think; anecdotal, but I definitely
have the feeling.</p>
<p>It seems that there are quite a few people who just don’t want to come out
and play. They genuinely don’t feel the appeal of getting out there on the
streets in their neighborhood. This is hard for me to understand.</p>
<p>Of course, there’s a huge untapped pool of highly-qualified players: the
millions and millions of 
people in iOS-land.  My feelings are mixed; I think Ingress is both fun and
good for its players. So more people is better. But I’ve also enjoyed the
distinct flavor (not necessarily better, just different) that follows on the
absence of Apple People.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/19/">
 <title>News Fail</title>
 <link href="Boston-News" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="6" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Boston-News#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/19/Boston-News</id>
 <published>2013-04-19T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-19T09:15:57-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Places/America" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Places" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="America" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology/Publishing" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Technology" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Publishing" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">So yeah, I sat up till 2AM (Pacific, 5AM in Boston), fascinated by the situation in Cambridge and Watertown.  I listened to the police radio online, watched a few live Twitter feeds, and had a couple Google Maps windows zoomed in on streets that I’d never heard of but now know where they are: Hazel, Dexter, Laurel.  The professional news media knew less than I (3 timezones away) did, but said more; somewhere between nauseating and just silly.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>So yeah, I sat up till 2AM (Pacific, 5AM in Boston), fascinated by the
situation in Cambridge and Watertown.  I listened to the police radio online,
watched a few live Twitter feeds, and had a couple Google Maps windows zoomed
in on streets that I’d never heard of but now know where they are: Hazel,
Dexter, Laurel.  The professional news media knew less than I (3 timezones
away) did, but said more; somewhere between nauseating and just silly.</p>
<p>I tried a few live-TV streams but the inconsequential arm-waving and flow
of bloviation-with-good-hair-on-top was unbearable.  And clearly they weren’t
listening to the scanner or watching the right Twitterers.</p>
<p>One little example: After the big Watertown shootout, some police
official said something like “Two suspects accounted for, we are searching for
more.” And instantly the so-called news professionals began speculating about
not just two guys, but larger gangs and wider plots.  If you’d been following
the primary sources, you knew perfectly well that there’d been <em>two</em>
guys, one was dead or in custody after the shootout at Dexter &amp; Laurel,
the other’s location was unknown.  There were lots more like this.</p>
<p>This morning, when I got up, the good papers (NYT, WSJ) had well-reported
stories about the Tsarnaev brothers and the night’s mayhem, which corresponded
well to what I’d heard in real-time.  So maybe there’s hope for journalism;
but just not in real-time.</p>
<p>Thanks to Danny Sullivan for an excellent
<a href="https://twitter.com/dannysullivan/watertown">curated Twitter
feed</a>, and whoever it was at
<a href="http://www.radioreference.com/">RadioReference</a> that put up the
nice robust police-scanner stream.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/18/">
 <title>HP6 — Greens</title>
 <link href="Hawaii-Greens" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="0" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Hawaii-Greens#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/18/Hawaii-Greens</id>
 <published>2013-04-18T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-18T22:06:06-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Places/Hawaii" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Places" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Hawaii" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This, I promise, is the second-last outburst consequent upon the <b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem where my Lightroom is all bulgy with nifty Big-Island photos.  Today, shades of green at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akaka_Falls_State_Park">Akaka Falls State Park</a>.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>This, I promise, is the second-last outburst consequent upon the
<b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem where my Lightroom is all bulgy with nifty
Big-Island photos.  Today, shades of green at
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akaka_Falls_State_Park">Akaka Falls
State Park</a>.</p>
<p>It’s a nice park at the end of nice drive north from Hilo, with a
worthwhile side-trip to that
<a href="/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/14/Hawaii-Botanicals">botanical garden</a>
then through the pleasant village of Honomu.</p>
<p>The park itself is an unchallenging half-hour ramble along causeways
through pretty dense rainforest up to where there’s a nice view of the falls.
Except for the green stuff was more interesting that the long twisting white
stream of water. Like this:</p>
<img src="DSCF3138.png" alt="Greenery in Akaka Falls state park, Hawaii" />
<p>Oh, and the waterfall.</p>
<img src="DSCF3136.png" alt="Akaka Falls, Hawaii" />
<p>Since very few monitors out there are correctly calibrated, it’s unlikely
that any two people will see the same 50 or so shades of green, but most of
the variations will still probably look pretty good.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/16/">
 <title>Measure the Pain</title>
 <link href="Turnaround-Time" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="6" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Turnaround-Time#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/16/Turnaround-Time</id>
 <published>2013-04-16T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-16T23:41:56-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Life Online" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Life Online" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business/Software" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Business" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Software" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Learning isn’t free; re-learning is paying the price twice. Many of the people who use what we geeks make would like to re-learn less.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Learning isn’t free; re-learning is paying the price twice.
Many of the people who use what we geeks make would like to
re-learn less.</p>
<p>One of them is
<a href="http://fixingthehobosuit.com/">Patric King</a>, interviewed in 
<a href="http://patric.king.usesthis.com/">The Setup</a>, an instructive and
enjoyable publication.  I’m excerpting his
whole last paragraph but the rest is good too:</p>
<blockquote><p>I would love to see a return to a longer turnaround between
software packages. There’s an artificial churn happening in how quickly we
need to re-learn tools, because companies are learning to move their software
products to a subscription basis. I am seriously tempted to jump off that
bandwagon, if I were confident I could find a workflow and OS that wouldn’t be
painful to re-learn on a bi-annual basis, rather than every six
months.</p></blockquote>
<p>At Apple historically it was like this: If Steve and Jony wanted to make a
big change (say, reverse scrolling in Lion), they just told
the engineers to do it, and the engineers did it. People complained, but
because Steve and Jony had great instincts, usually ended up ahead of
where they’d been.</p>
<p>At Google historically, someone proposes a change (say, rework the
Gmail compose window), and there’d be
agreed-on metrics as to what part of the user experience they were trying to
improve, and they’d run big studies, and if the metrics moved the right way,
the change rolled out. People complained, but because the data mostly doesn’t
lie,  usually ended up ahead of where they’d been.</p>
<p>OK, I’m stereotyping: Apple measures things, and Google has 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matias_Duarte">Matias Duarte</a>.  And
crucially, 
both strategies give the same weight to the interim pain, when people are
figuring out how to do again what they could do before: <em>Zero</em>.</p>
<p>This hurts me.  I’m an old guy with lots of civilian friends, and when
they ping me and say “OMG why did you BREAK my Gmail?!?!” I get pissed, not
because they’re ruining my day but because we partly ruined theirs.</p>
<p>Am I a Luddite?  Am I just change-averse?  Do I want to stick with “good
enough” when on the Internet, tomorrow is axiomatically better than today?  Do
I want us to ignore all the people building better things that people will
switch to if we don’t build even better things?</p>
<p>Well, no, mostly. It’s called “software” because it’s soft,
you can change it.  But I hate to ruin anyone’s day.  And I’d like to measure
the pain not just the gain.</p>
</div></content></entry>

<entry xml:base="When/201x/2013/04/15/">
 <title>HP5 — Lava Context</title>
 <link href="Lava-Context" />
 <link rel="replies" thr:count="1" type="application/xhtml+xml" href="Lava-Context#comments" />
 <id>https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/201x/2013/04/15/Lava-Context</id>
 <published>2013-04-15T12:00:00-07:00</published>
 <updated>2013-04-15T23:19:37-07:00</updated>
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts/Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Arts" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Photos" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World/Places/Hawaii" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="The World" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Places" />
 <category scheme="https://www.tbray.org/ongoing/What/" term="Hawaii" />
 <summary type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Having bombarded you with lava pix while dealing with my need-to-overshare  <b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem, I thought it’d be nice to show the story of where the hot rock came from.</div></summary>
<content type="xhtml"><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Having bombarded you with lava pix while dealing with my need-to-overshare 
<b>H</b>awaii <b>P</b>roblem, I thought it’d be nice to show the story of
where the hot rock came from.</p>
<p>Let’s take that literally; all those glowing-lava pix were part of what the
Hawaiian Volcano Observatory calls the “Peace Day flow from
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pu%CA%BBu_%CA%BB%C5%8C%CA%BB%C5%8D">Pu`u
`O`o</a> vent” (check out the nifty
<a href="http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/activity/kilaueastatus.php">Recent Kilauea
Status</a> page). Here’s its path down Kilauea’s side to the sea. You
might have to enlarge the photo to see the line of 
plumes: volcanic smoke, steam, and burning vegetation.</p>
<img src="DSCF2920.png" alt="The Peace Day flow from Pu`u `O`o vent coming down Kilauea" />
<p>The black-and-white version of that photo is remarkably dramatic, but I’m
storytelling here and this one has more truth.</p>
<p>Let’s back off a bit.  This isn’t that much of a photo, but does have 
a story to tell.  We’re looking across the crater of
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C4%ABlauea_Iki">Kilauea Iki</a>, which
was last a lava lake in 1959, out at the main Kilauea caldera. To the left is
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halemaumau_Crater">Halemaumau
crater</a>, which holds a lava lake right now, that’s why there’s smoke coming
out of it.  And the gentle bulge at the right rear is 
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauna_Loa">Mauna Loa</a> itself, the Big
Mama volcano that all these are fleas on the side of. One of the park guys
told us that when Mauna Loa erupts, it pumps lava at a rate ten times
greater than all of Kilauea put together.  It’s erupted 32 times since 1843,
most recently in 1950, 1975, and 1984.  It’s pretty well due.</p>
<img src="DSCF3003.png" alt="Kilauea Iki, Halemaumau, and Mauna Loa" />
<p>Now let’s look at some old lava.  If you started from where that last
picture was taken and headed a little west of north up to the top of Mauna Loa
and went down the other side into the saddle between it and Mauna Kea, you’d
come to a small, very old, cinder cone on which is the Kipuka Pu’u
Huluhulu Nature Reserve. It’s got a little parking lot, a
steep-and-slightly-scary path up the side, and the nicest little soft-green
spot imaginable at the top, perfect for a picnic.</p>
<p>This is from there; these lava flows are, I don’t know, a <em>whole
lot</em> older than those to the south; could be a hundred or a hundred
thousand years. There’s not much rain up here so the lava weathers slowly.</p>
<img src="DSCF3155.png" alt="View from the Kipuka Pu’u Huluhulu Nature Reserve" />
<p>Lava, it’s full of stories.</p>
</div></content></entry>

</feed>
