<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Online Media Links</title><description>Selected articles and news on the online advertising and publishing industry</description><link>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>322</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OnlineMediaLinks" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-5537329465935159380</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-12T07:33:14.544-08:00</atom:updated><title>Interview with Ken Auletta, author of Googled - the end of the world as we know it</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.iwantmedia.com/people/people83.html"&gt;I Want Media&lt;/a&gt;: "Google is not composed of cold businessmen; they are cold engineers. The difference is that Google is not obsessed with killing competitors; they're obsessed with eliminating inefficiencies. They're not trying to harm the New York Times with Google News or NBC with YouTube. In some ways, they help them. A reason NBC's 'Saturday Night Live' is reaching a younger audience is because it winks as YouTube downloads its skits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Google and the Internet do disrupt traditional media business models. More than a few traditional media executives fervently believe Google aims to conquer the world. By obsessing about Google's 'evil' intentions they spend too much time playing defense and not enough time figuring out their own digital offense."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-5537329465935159380?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/KpsC6rBoZnY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/KpsC6rBoZnY/interview-with-ken-auletta-author-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/11/interview-with-ken-auletta-author-of.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-4631256013249706231</guid><pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-12T07:17:28.160-08:00</atom:updated><title>Is Facebook a Paradise for Scammers?</title><description>&lt;a href="http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/techtonicshifts/archive/2009/11/06/is-facebook-a-paradise-for-scammers.aspx?utm_source=Revenue+Performance+Newsletter&amp;amp;utm_campaign=9abcfb88dd-11_12_2009&amp;amp;utm_medium=email"&gt;Newsweek.com&lt;/a&gt;: "This week, Silicon Valley blogger Michael Arrington caused a ruckus by suggesting that Facebook itself has been turning a blind eye to the scams because it is sharing in the spoils. Arrington, who runs the influential TechCrunch blog, is on a crusade to pressure Facebook to clean up its act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“Ultimately this is Facebook’s fault,” Arrington says. He says the social-networking site isn’t enforcing its own rules against scam ads. “It’s like with Major League Baseball and steroids. If the rules aren’t enforced, which is what’s happening on Facebook, then people are going to break the rules. Facebook needs to stop this.”"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-4631256013249706231?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/43pMyXAepNw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/43pMyXAepNw/is-facebook-paradise-for-scammers.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/11/is-facebook-paradise-for-scammers.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1139111411940609561</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-06T09:13:05.645-08:00</atom:updated><title>Google Declares War on Facebook</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-04/googles-war-with-facebook/"&gt;The Daily Beast&lt;/a&gt;: "Google announced this week that it is putting a few new bells and whistles on its Friend Connect software. Users visiting sites that have the application installed will be able to fill out little profiles of themselves and see the profiles of others who have been there. Presumably, regular visitors of the same sites will seek each other out based on shared opinions and preferences. And make friends. Think of it as Facebook functionality without the Facebook."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1139111411940609561?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/YN1_ZYQTiW0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/YN1_ZYQTiW0/google-declares-war-on-facebook.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/11/google-declares-war-on-facebook.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-2946199831478818607</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-06T09:11:47.280-08:00</atom:updated><title>Study: Internet use leads to more diverse networks</title><description>&lt;a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20091104/ap_on_hi_te/us_tec_techbit_internet_isolation"&gt;Yahoo! Tech&lt;/a&gt;: "Online activities such as e-mail, blogging and frequenting Internet hangouts can even lead to larger, more diverse social networks, according to the study released Wednesday by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. The study refutes research earlier in the decade suggesting that people's growing embrace of technology has come at the expense of close human connections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;'Social isolation has not changed that much since 1985,' said Keith Hampton, the main author of the study professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Annenberg School for Communication. This means that very few adults — 6 percent of the population — say they have no one to talk to about important matters in their lives."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-2946199831478818607?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/1AD6Bon-9Jk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/1AD6Bon-9Jk/study-internet-use-leads-to-more.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/11/study-internet-use-leads-to-more.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-3574641884274213858</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-06T05:30:51.657-08:00</atom:updated><title>As Facebook Ages, Gen Y Turns to Twitter</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/as_facebook_ages_gen_y_turns_to_twitter.php"&gt;ReadWriteWeb&lt;/a&gt;: "Over the course of the year, there have been countless reports - some more substantial than others - but all with the same message: Generation Y is just not interested in Twitter. The reports generally cited members of this demographic as saying Twitter was 'pointless' and 'narcissistic.'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apparently, that's beginning to change. Well, maybe not their perception of Twitter, but certainly their use of it. Today, Twitter is now the second-youngest of the top four social networking sites. Its median age is 31. MySpace's is 26, LinkedIn is 39, and, as noted above, Facebook is 33."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-3574641884274213858?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/Lf1uroJezJM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/Lf1uroJezJM/as-facebook-ages-gen-y-turns-to-twitter.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/11/as-facebook-ages-gen-y-turns-to-twitter.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-8562320918892020688</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-14T14:14:04.752-07:00</atom:updated><title>Google Accounts for 6% of All Internet Traffic</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/external/readwriteweb/2009/10/13/13readwriteweb-google-accounts-for-6-of-all-internet-traff-90323.html"&gt;NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt;: "Now, instead of traffic being distributed among tens of thousands of networks, only 150 networks control some 50% of all online traffic. Among these new Internet superpowers, it's no surprise to find Google listed. In fact, the search giant accounts for the largest source (6%) of all Internet traffic worldwide."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-8562320918892020688?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/GK0eGI_dkSw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/GK0eGI_dkSw/google-accounts-for-6-of-all-internet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/10/google-accounts-for-6-of-all-internet.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1996721506091935091</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-09T08:48:47.146-07:00</atom:updated><title>The PC is becoming the new TV, survey shows</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-online-tv9-2009sep09,0,3144574.story"&gt;latimes.com&lt;/a&gt;: "A survey by the nonprofit Conference Board released Tuesday showed that nearly a quarter of households in the U.S. now view television programs online. That's up from 20% last year."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1996721506091935091?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/yYd-R3FWqYw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/yYd-R3FWqYw/pc-is-becoming-new-tv-survey-shows.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/09/pc-is-becoming-new-tv-survey-shows.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-2396794890690154437</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-02T06:39:46.627-07:00</atom:updated><title>Social networking sites grab big slice of Web ads</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE5805QX20090901"&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;: "The study by comScore, released on Tuesday, said social media sites represented 21.1 percent of U.S. Internet display ads in July, with MySpace and Facebook accounting for more than 80 percent of those ads."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-2396794890690154437?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/o7EWgC63fxQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/o7EWgC63fxQ/social-networking-sites-grab-big-slice.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/09/social-networking-sites-grab-big-slice.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-2646174408223601518</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-01T12:52:37.850-07:00</atom:updated><title>Facebook Sets Sights On Online Payments Business</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.smartmoney.com/news/ON/?story=ON-20090831-000127-0805"&gt;SmartMoney.com&lt;/a&gt;: "This month, the company revealed it is testing a system for users to buy physical merchandise, like real roses, through Facebook's payment platform. It also launched a test to let some users buy Facebook Credits by billing their mobile phones."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-2646174408223601518?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/vnsy2qOWr0A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/vnsy2qOWr0A/facebook-sets-sights-on-online-payments.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/09/facebook-sets-sights-on-online-payments.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-70475681497333365</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-26T09:19:14.932-07:00</atom:updated><title>Media multitasking doesn't work say researchers</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE57N55D20090824"&gt;Reuters&lt;/a&gt;: Multitaskers of media activities like watching YouTube, writing e-mail and talking on the phone are not very good at any of their tasks, according to a Stanford University report on Monday.&lt;span id="midArticle_1"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;       &lt;span id="midArticle_2"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;       &lt;p&gt;"Heavy multitaskers are lousy at multitasking... The more you do it, the worse you get," said Stanford communications professor Clifford Nass.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-70475681497333365?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/uDd4YPOO_4c" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/uDd4YPOO_4c/media-multitasking-doesnt-work-say.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/media-multitasking-doesnt-work-say.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1488776468332261692</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-26T09:16:43.998-07:00</atom:updated><title>Addicted to the Internet? $14,500, please, at first US rehab</title><description>&lt;a href="http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/08/addicted-to-the-internet-14500-please-for-first-us-rehab.ars"&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/a&gt;: "A rehab center has opened in Washington state that aims to treat Internet Addiction Disorder with counseling, psychiatric help, and other activities geared toward getting patients back on track with normal life. If you believe in the disorder, then this is a great first step—but not everyone does."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1488776468332261692?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/NRihz8mqEok" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/NRihz8mqEok/addicted-to-internet-14500-please-at.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/addicted-to-internet-14500-please-at.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-4007111434427228522</guid><pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-25T09:42:58.363-07:00</atom:updated><title>Milestone: Local online tops traditional</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.insideradio.com/Article.asp?id=1465446&amp;amp;spid=32061"&gt;Inside Radio / M Street Publications&lt;/a&gt;: "For the first time, digital media use exceeds that of radio, newspaper, television and other traditional media among small and medium-sized businesses.  BIA/Kelsey’s Local Commerce Monitor study shows 77% of local businesses are doing some form of digital marketing.  At the same time, traditional media usage slips to 69%."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-4007111434427228522?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/i-0Z4hX83XM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/i-0Z4hX83XM/milestone-local-online-tops-traditional.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/milestone-local-online-tops-traditional.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-7198076697037107147</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-14T07:52:36.380-07:00</atom:updated><title>Study shows there is not a lot of news on Twitter</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/sanantonio/stories/2009/08/10/daily36.html"&gt;San Antonio Business Journal&lt;/a&gt;: "After randomly sampling a public timeline of tweets — 140 character comments on Twitter — for 10 days, Pearanalytics found that 40.5 percent of the updates fell in the “pointless babble” category. An example: “I am eating a sandwich now.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Other findings:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 37.5 percent of the comments were conversational — a back-and-forth discussion on a topic&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 8.7 percent had pass-along value — tweets that were re-broadcast or re-tweeted&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 5.8 percent were self promotional&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 3.75 percent were spam — the equivalent of junk mail&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;• 3.6 percent were news"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pearanalytics.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/Twitter-Study-August-2009.pdf"&gt;Read the original research report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-7198076697037107147?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/NN1aOe_VOKc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/NN1aOe_VOKc/study-shows-there-is-not-lot-of-news-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/study-shows-there-is-not-lot-of-news-on.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-5938507772977893240</guid><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-12T08:21:54.710-07:00</atom:updated><title>Media buyers: Twitter is for, well, twits</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.medialifemagazine.com/artman2/publish/New_media_23/Media_buyers_Twitter_is_for_well_twits.asp"&gt;Media Life Magazine&lt;/a&gt;: "Twitter earns a big thumbs down from more than half of the media planners and buyers who responded to a recent Media Life survey on new media advertising and the areas of promising growth.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked to finish the statement: 'Twitter is,' 52 percent agreed with this statement: 'For twits. I predict we'll look back on this silly craze as the Friendster of 2009. It holds little promise for advertisers (or anyone else).'"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-5938507772977893240?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/RWJUv7RifYc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/RWJUv7RifYc/media-buyers-twitter-is-for-well-twits.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/media-buyers-twitter-is-for-well-twits.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-411174351296226128</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-06T10:51:08.210-07:00</atom:updated><title>Celeb Endorsements Come to Twitter</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/3634617"&gt;ClickZ&lt;/a&gt;: "Izea launched Sponsored Tweets this week to connect popular tweeters with advertisers -- who, in turn, pay tweeters to tweet. And reaction is mixed. Some experts say this is a natural progression of Twitter and that paid tweets are no different than any celebrity using their clout to endorse a brand. Others go so far as to say paid tweets are the end of Twitter as we know it."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-411174351296226128?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/qWf866PMbxU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/qWf866PMbxU/celeb-endorsements-come-to-twitter.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/celeb-endorsements-come-to-twitter.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-5902890901603283642</guid><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-06T10:48:38.182-07:00</atom:updated><title>Social sites losing popularity with young</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6cfa1006-8207-11de-9c5e-00144feabdc0.html"&gt;FT.com&lt;/a&gt;: "The proportion of British 15- to 24-year-olds with a profile on a social networking site such as Facebook or MySpace fell for the first time last year from 55 per cent to 50 per cent"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-5902890901603283642?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/ebdWQaLxySA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/ebdWQaLxySA/social-sites-losing-popularity-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/08/social-sites-losing-popularity-with.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-2820816037328574225</guid><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-29T05:25:05.295-07:00</atom:updated><title>Microsoft, Yahoo to Take on Google With Search Deal</title><description>&lt;a href="http://adage.com/digital/article?article_id=138177"&gt;Advertising Age&lt;/a&gt;: "Through the pact, Bing will become the default search engine on Yahoo, creating a search player with close to 30% market share of search queries, compared with Google's 65%, according to ComScore data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the most interesting wrinkles involves who takes ownership of search sales: Yahoo is likely to take on exclusive representation of Bing inventory to eliminate channel conflict and complexity for advertisers, but not before both sides unwind the thousands of advertiser relationships and proprietary systems through which many large advertisers buy search ads. Microsoft's AdCenter is expected to be the sales-technology platform."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-2820816037328574225?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/_tNZj4e71ic" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/_tNZj4e71ic/microsoft-yahoo-to-take-on-google-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/07/microsoft-yahoo-to-take-on-google-with.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-8718273256069091812</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-09T10:13:09.060-07:00</atom:updated><title>Best Buy/TiVo Partner To Push Home Entertainment</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;amp;art_aid=109476"&gt;MediaPost&lt;/a&gt;: "Part of the new agreement will have the two companies developing a new cable set-top box, sold in Best Buy stores, that allows the retailer to deliver its own advertising message to TiVo subscribers."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-8718273256069091812?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/h-ypxcbgnUE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/h-ypxcbgnUE/best-buytivo-partner-to-push-home.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/07/best-buytivo-partner-to-push-home.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-3736261366715889972</guid><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-01T07:24:05.556-07:00</atom:updated><title>Mainstream media failing to make news understandable to public, says new report</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/534969.php"&gt;Journalism.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;: "We were struck by the confidence that people expressed in the internet generally and Google specifically as the most trusted resource of explanation and analysis"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-3736261366715889972?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/-Xz24Mny7CI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/-Xz24Mny7CI/mainstream-media-failing-to-make-news.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/07/mainstream-media-failing-to-make-news.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-3576737215112968713</guid><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-22T13:32:41.569-07:00</atom:updated><title>Pew Center illustrates how Craigslist is killing newspapers</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10247668-93.html"&gt;CNET&lt;/a&gt;: "Not that this is big news but the Pew Center helps to illustrate just how devastating online classifieds has been on newspapers. A graph of newspaper classified ad revenue since 1980 to last year ... shows that the industry saw a high in 2000 with about $19.6 billion. Last year, newspapers recorded $9.9 billion."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-3576737215112968713?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/tJi8VtpgGC4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/tJi8VtpgGC4/pew-center-illustrates-how-craigslist.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/05/pew-center-illustrates-how-craigslist.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1119304631992245472</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-11T08:09:09.388-07:00</atom:updated><title>Hulu's tug of war with TV</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-hulu11-2009may11,0,5771665.story"&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/a&gt;: "But in making a bid for the next generation of Internet- attuned viewers, Hulu's owners have strained their lucrative relationships with cable and satellite operators. Companies like Time Warner Cable Inc. and DirecTV Group Inc. pay cable networks billions of dollars each year to carry programming. Believing that they should have exclusivity because their payments support the enormous cost of producing TV shows, such companies have been pushing back against the Hulu freebies."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1119304631992245472?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/2nIme_9b89U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/2nIme_9b89U/hulus-tug-of-war-with-tv.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/05/hulus-tug-of-war-with-tv.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-5421862370626645306</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-11T08:01:05.604-07:00</atom:updated><title>How the next internet revolution will save your favourite TV shows, newspapers and magazines</title><description>&lt;a href="http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article6256359.ece"&gt;Times Online&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-5421862370626645306?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/D2Udu5bMNrY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/D2Udu5bMNrY/how-next-internet-revolution-will-save.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/05/how-next-internet-revolution-will-save.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1505701067763684916</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-21T06:21:14.481-07:00</atom:updated><title>Brand Mentions Preferred over Ads</title><description>&lt;a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?R=1007050"&gt;eMarketer&lt;/a&gt;: "Compared with banner ads, pop-up ads, e-mail offers and sponsored links, articles that include brand information were most likely to lead US Internet users to read—and act."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1505701067763684916?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/gKiiwS4AJfE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/gKiiwS4AJfE/brand-mentions-preferred-over-ads.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/04/brand-mentions-preferred-over-ads.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-4453768000181190661</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:26:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-21T00:26:32.896-07:00</atom:updated><title>Bloggers: America's Newest Profession</title><description>&lt;a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124026415808636575.html"&gt;WSJ.com&lt;/a&gt;: "In America today, there are almost as many people making their living as bloggers as there are lawyers. Already more Americans are making their primary income from posting their opinions than Americans working as computer programmers, firefighters or even bartenders."&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-4453768000181190661?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/ZqbloTRET4Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/ZqbloTRET4Y/bloggers-americas-newest-profession.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/04/bloggers-americas-newest-profession.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4394335483992772753.post-1263495086360617678</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-04-08T13:58:52.365-07:00</atom:updated><title>Techmeme founder: WSJ, NYT are aggregators</title><description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10215444-93.html"&gt;CNET&lt;/a&gt;: "'All successful Web publishers want their content quoted and linked,' Rivera wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com. 'The benefits are clear. Some prefer that the quotes remain short...these are precisely the kind that Google and Techmeme use. So for AP and News Corp. to discourage quoting is a clue that they don't really get the Web and are in danger of shooting themselves in the foot.'"&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/4394335483992772753-1263495086360617678?l=onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com'/&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~4/MhGCm5aw990" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMediaLinks/~3/MhGCm5aw990/techmeme-founder-wsj-nyt-are.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Graham Jenkin)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://onlinemedialinks.blogspot.com/2009/04/techmeme-founder-wsj-nyt-are.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
