Comments for Open GUID

Comment on WordNet links by Qungwmqp

Qungwmqp — Fri, 04 May 2012 23:02:07 +0000

This site is crazy http://ynutofotoucy.de.tl little nymphets nude pictures u know what is wierd, they never show the entire body of those person it sounds to me like FAKE

Comment on Linking classes, concepts, and individuals by Jason

Jason — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 20:08:28 +0000

I was just paraphrasing so the triple would fit on one line…probably not a good enough reason to be inconsistent. Since this post was meant to be read by humans, it seemed safe to use a short hand. An actual RDF document would look more like this.

I actually kind of like the result. I am looking for ways to embed references to Open GUIDs in content in a manner that is usable and resolvable. Using an href seems like a good start…though a float over div with the keywords and description would be better. Hopefully tools will get to the point that we have the best of both worlds.

Comment on Linking classes, concepts, and individuals by Bernard

Bernard — Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:31:15 +0000

Two remarks on this example.

Why do you write oguid:OrganicFood instead of the actual URI
oguid:ea434692-e2c7-102b-9532-00301b462e0a?
This does not seem consistent about what you write everywhere else about the necessary “opacity” and “ugliness” of oguid URIs.

Using so-called “multilingual” URIs such as “bar:LabelAB” or “foo:AlimentosOrganicos” would help to make the point.

Bernard

Comment on WordNet links by Jason

Jason — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:13:00 +0000

I agree that is bad practice. As such, the wn3.0 URL is not published in any RDF documents or hyperlinked from the GUID summary screen. It merely exists as an informational reference to help people understand it’s nature.

Another benefit of maintaining the reference: it can easily become an “active” link if new versions of WordNet RDF/OWL are ever published by the W3C.

Comment on WordNet links by Matthias Samwald

Matthias Samwald — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:15:01 +0000

“2896 concepts were brand new. Since there is not an RDF representation of 3.0, these are maintained with a fictional URL to the W3C, approximately what it would be if they were to publish a new version.”

Uhm, if I understood you right that sounds like a bad idea. Declaring entities in foreign namespaces is really bad practice.

Matthias Samwald
DERI Galway, Ireland // Semantic Web Company, Austria