<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 01:41:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>S. 2488</category><category>cross post</category><category>congress</category><category>elections</category><category>Oregon</category><category>tarp</category><category>FOIA</category><category>House</category><category>publicresource.org</category><category>democratic</category><category>lobbyists</category><category>travel</category><category>poia</category><category>cost estimate</category><category>video</category><category>congressional hearings</category><category>representatives</category><category>malamaud</category><category>staff costs</category><category>congressional</category><category>primary</category><category>veterans</category><category>Internet Archive</category><category>Freddie</category><category>procurement</category><category>budget</category><category>CBO</category><category>O'Reilly Radar</category><category>federal legislation</category><category>studies</category><category>Legistorm</category><category>legal opinion</category><category>Fannie</category><category>GSE</category><category>international</category><category>clinton</category><category>treasury</category><category>obama</category><category>HFA</category><category>copyright</category><category>florida</category><category>hardest hit</category><category>regulations</category><category>open government</category><category>senators</category><category>sunshine week</category><category>sunlight foundation</category><category>california</category><category>copenhagen</category><category>Realtors</category><title>Open Government News and Issues, Oregon</title><description /><link>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>23</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon" /><feedburner:info uri="opengovernmentnewsandissuesoregon" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><itunes:owner><itunes:email>noreply@blogger.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle><feedburner:emailServiceId>OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-9055383536089445154</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-04-17T10:51:33.826-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">treasury</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">hardest hit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">florida</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">california</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">tarp</category><title>Cross Post: Florida Hardest Hit Housing TARP Spending Plan Out; California Refuses to Disclose Their $700 Million Plan.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;In a new post &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2010/04/arizona-goes-summary-route-with-their.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;on my &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/span&gt;, I  provide a link to Florida's plan to spend $418 Million in TARP Hardest  Hit housing funds. This plan was sent to Treasury on April 16th along  with plans from 4 other states (Arizona, California, Michigan, Nevada).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regretfully,   the same post also points out that  California is refusing to disclose  how it plans to spend their $700 Million TARP Hardest Hit funding  allocation, claiming that Treasury won't let them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I have  noted in prior posts, I am optimistic that Oregon will provide a much  better example of open government than any of the first round Hardest  Hit funded states [ Florida clearly was the best of the first round  states].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I expect Oregon will have more community meetings and  more specific alternatives, and at some point will publish the complete  draft plan for Oregonians to comment upon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(A link to my earlier  cross post about absence of public disclosure in first round states is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2010/04/cross-post-public-disclosure-lacking-in.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;;  you can find all of my posts on this topic on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;  with a keyword search on the blog using term "hardest hit").&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally   created and posted on the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/"&gt;Open Government, News and  Issues Oregon Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-9055383536089445154?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/_SN9GmSd26s" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/_SN9GmSd26s/cross-post-florida-hardest-hit-housing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2010/04/cross-post-florida-hardest-hit-housing.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-8557044709517816094</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-04-13T09:57:57.899-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HFA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Oregon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">open government</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cross post</category><title>Cross Post: Public Disclosure Lacking in State Applications for $1.5 Billion in Hardest Hit Housing TARP Funding.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Oregon Housing Blog Post &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2010/04/1st-round-hardest-hit-state-hfa.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; details lack of public disclosure from first round states applying for $1.5 billion in Hardest Hit housing TARP funding.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt; Four days prior to the application submission deadline of April 16th these states have provided very little specifics about how they plan to spend the money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Post also highlights required plan contents and opportunity for Oregon to provide a public disclosure model for the $88 Million plan they will submit as a second round Hardest Hit state, NLT June 1, 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/"&gt;Open Government News and Issues, Oregon Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-8557044709517816094?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/SDrEagakIX0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/SDrEagakIX0/cross-post-public-disclosure-lacking-in.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2010/04/cross-post-public-disclosure-lacking-in.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-2572298122503592722</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-18T08:35:08.124-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sunlight foundation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">poia</category><title>New Federal Public Online Information Act Introduced.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Sunlight Foundation&lt;/span&gt; has new web page &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/policy/poia/"&gt;HERE &lt;/a&gt;explaining this new federal legislation, aka POIA, that has now been introduced in the House.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-2572298122503592722?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/VEuwieoLVAQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/VEuwieoLVAQ/new-federal-public-online-information.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-federal-public-online-information.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-699076978218891553</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-03-18T07:59:17.629-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cross post</category><title>Cross Post: Oregon Housing Blog Sunshine Week Recap.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;A recap of past activity related to Sunshine Week from my &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/span&gt;, as well as continuing challenges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Post is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2010/03/sunshine-week-oregon-housing-blog.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-699076978218891553?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/lcCoTv2nmpc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/lcCoTv2nmpc/cross-post-oregon-housing-blog-sunshine.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2010/03/cross-post-oregon-housing-blog-sunshine.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-674427846322993864</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-08-30T09:09:39.739-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">elections</category><title>Sarah Palin Financial Disclosures.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif; font-size: small;"&gt;Sarah Palin financial disclosures can be found&lt;b style="color: red;"&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href="http://aws.state.ak.us/apocinterim/pofdSearch.aspx?s_last_name=palin"&gt;&lt;b style="color: red;"&gt;HERE&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-674427846322993864?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/ZQ2ZHd0P_4E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/ZQ2ZHd0P_4E/sarah-palin-financial-disclosures.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/08/sarah-palin-financial-disclosures.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-3045003143512113449</guid><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-19T13:25:12.255-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">copyright</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Oregon</category><title>Oregon Disclaims ORS Copyright.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;I attended a hearing today where the Oregon Legislative Counsel Committee voted &lt;/span&gt;unanimously&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; to disclaim any future copyright claims on the Oregon Revised Statutes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;My prior post with background leading up to this decision is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/state-assertion-of-copyright-for-oregon.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-3045003143512113449?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/i21axKYvqHE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/i21axKYvqHE/oregon-disclaims-ors-copyright.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/06/oregon-disclaims-ors-copyright.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-4400368990665067681</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-17T10:05:55.604-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sunlight foundation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Oregon</category><title>Sunlight Foundation Picks Up on My Prior Highlighting of a YouTube Post.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;The [highly recommended] &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Sunlight Foundation Blog&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;, in a&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt; "Local Sunlight " &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;post, picked up on one of my recent posts about a House Small Business &lt;/span&gt;Committee&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; upload of a &lt;/span&gt;RESPA&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; hearing onto &lt;/span&gt;YouTube&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;This &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Sunlight Foundation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Blog&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; post, which includes other "Local Sunlight" examples can be found &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2008/06/16/local-sunlight-2/"&gt;HERE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-4400368990665067681?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/Yp2oTPA2muw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/Yp2oTPA2muw/sunlight-foundation-picks-up-on-my.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/06/sunlight-foundation-picks-up-on-my.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-7962411749325610713</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-06-02T07:59:23.006-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">video</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">congressional hearings</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulations</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">House</category><title>Creative Open Government: U.S. House Committee Posts RESPA Hearing Video on YouTube.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;The House Small Business Committee recently held a hearing on proposed HUD rules for the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act&lt;/span&gt;, AKA "RESPA". &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition to the usual posting of written testimony from various government and housing industry officials, the Committee has posted a number of videos on &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;YouTube&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; of hearing testimony and question and answers &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-family: verdana; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=3D2119D212C338A1"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Staff took the time to break up a long video into a number of shorter videos to allow viewers to focus on speakers of interest. Kudos to the Committee and staff for their efforts in making the video of this hearing available to the public in a timely, easy to use fashion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Below is one of the hearing videos featuring an official from the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Center for Responsible Lending:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/We0JmLickYA&amp;amp;hl=en"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/We0JmLickYA&amp;amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-7962411749325610713?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/ugI87BUznl4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/ugI87BUznl4/creative-open-government-us-house.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><enclosure url="http://www.youtube.com/v/We0JmLickYA&amp;amp;hl=en" length="1050" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><media:content url="http://www.youtube.com/v/We0JmLickYA&amp;amp;hl=en" fileSize="1050" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The House Small Business Committee recently held a hearing on proposed HUD rules for the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act, AKA "RESPA". In addition to the usual posting of written testimony from various government and housing industry officials, </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>The House Small Business Committee recently held a hearing on proposed HUD rules for the Real Estate Settlement and Procedures Act, AKA "RESPA". In addition to the usual posting of written testimony from various government and housing industry officials, the Committee has posted a number of videos on YouTube of hearing testimony and question and answers HERE. Staff took the time to break up a long video into a number of shorter videos to allow viewers to focus on speakers of interest. Kudos to the Committee and staff for their efforts in making the video of this hearing available to the public in a timely, easy to use fashion. Below is one of the hearing videos featuring an official from the Center for Responsible Lending: </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>video, congressional hearings, regulations, House</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/06/creative-open-government-us-house.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-4727700461570515829</guid><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-31T08:35:32.280-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">copenhagen</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cost estimate</category><title>Copenhagen Consensus 2008 Results: Vitamin/Mineral Supplements Came Up As Top Priority.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;I previously posted about the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;2008 Copenhagen Consensus&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; process &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/copenhagen-consensus-to-rank.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;The 2008 process is now complete and the panel &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;[which included 5 Nobel laureate members] &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;considering various options to spend $75 Billion over a 4 year period came out with their list of the top 30 priorities.  You can see the list of 2008 priorities they chose &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fCC08%2fPresse++result%2fCC08_results_FINAL.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;; the logic for the &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;top&lt;/span&gt; priority reads like this:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;"Providing micronutrients for 80% of the 140 million children who lack essential vitamins in the form of vitamin A capsules and a course of zinc supplements would cost just $60 million per year, according to the analysis. More importantly, this action holds yearly benefits of more than $1 billion.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;In effect, this means that each dollar spent on this program creates benefits (in the form of better health, fewer deaths, increased future earnings, etc) worth more than 17 dollars."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-4727700461570515829?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/h1fqrw4Edi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/h1fqrw4Edi0/copenhagen-consensus-2008-results.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><enclosure url="http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fCC08%2fPresse++result%2fCC08_results_FINAL.pdf" length="189713" type="application/octet-stream" /><media:content url="http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fCC08%2fPresse++result%2fCC08_results_FINAL.pdf" fileSize="189713" type="application/octet-stream" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>I previously posted about the 2008 Copenhagen Consensus process HERE. The 2008 process is now complete and the panel [which included 5 Nobel laureate members] considering various options to spend $75 Billion over a 4 year period came out with their list o</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>I previously posted about the 2008 Copenhagen Consensus process HERE. The 2008 process is now complete and the panel [which included 5 Nobel laureate members] considering various options to spend $75 Billion over a 4 year period came out with their list of the top 30 priorities. You can see the list of 2008 priorities they chose HERE; the logic for the top priority reads like this: "Providing micronutrients for 80% of the 140 million children who lack essential vitamins in the form of vitamin A capsules and a course of zinc supplements would cost just $60 million per year, according to the analysis. More importantly, this action holds yearly benefits of more than $1 billion. In effect, this means that each dollar spent on this program creates benefits (in the form of better health, fewer deaths, increased future earnings, etc) worth more than 17 dollars."</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>copenhagen, cost estimate</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/copenhagen-consensus-2008-results.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-8282425991639049739</guid><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-26T11:16:01.775-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">publicresource.org</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Oregon</category><title>State Assertion of Copyright for Oregon Revised Statutes.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;A battle simmering for the last couple of months looks like it will reach a new stage in June. The battle is over the State of Oregon's attempt to assert copyright over the Oregon Revised Statutes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Complainants include &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://onward.justia.com/useful-tools-web-sites-203-cease-desist-resist-oregons-copyright-claim-on-the-oregon-revised-statutes.html"&gt;Justia &lt;/a&gt;and &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://public.resource.org/oregon/#trail"&gt;PublicResource.Org,&lt;/a&gt; which also includes in their post on this topic a "Paper Trail" of many of the documents associated with this issue.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;A summary of the battle to date can be found at &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Ars Technica&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080521-sites-sue-oregon-for-right-to-publish-its-laws-online.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;While a court filing is possible in early June, Oregon seems to be backing off a bit with a letter last week &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://public.resource.org/scribd/3044652.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;, requesting that the complaintants&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; present their objections to a legislative &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;committee in mid June.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-8282425991639049739?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/gJ5z7zvIpyc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/gJ5z7zvIpyc/state-assertion-of-copyright-for-oregon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><enclosure url="http://public.resource.org/scribd/3044652.pdf" length="54826" type="application/pdf" /><media:content url="http://public.resource.org/scribd/3044652.pdf" fileSize="54826" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>A battle simmering for the last couple of months looks like it will reach a new stage in June. The battle is over the State of Oregon's attempt to assert copyright over the Oregon Revised Statutes. Complainants include Justia and PublicResource.Org, which</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>A battle simmering for the last couple of months looks like it will reach a new stage in June. The battle is over the State of Oregon's attempt to assert copyright over the Oregon Revised Statutes. Complainants include Justia and PublicResource.Org, which also includes in their post on this topic a "Paper Trail" of many of the documents associated with this issue. A summary of the battle to date can be found at Ars Technica HERE. While a court filing is possible in early June, Oregon seems to be backing off a bit with a letter last week HERE, requesting that the complaintants present their objections to a legislative committee in mid June.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>publicresource.org, Oregon</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/state-assertion-of-copyright-for-oregon.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-2326950923529834639</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-23T09:29:42.413-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">international</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">studies</category><title>Copenhagen Consensus to Rank Cost/Benefits Of Solving Global Problems Next Week.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Interesting WSJ story &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121141221734512357.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; about effort to rank cost/benefits of solving a wide range of global problems. Effort is called Copenhagen Consensus; Wikipedia page about Copenhagen Consensus, with all of the usual caveats and a current focus on earlier conference held in 2004, is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_Consensus"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Another story &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.utdallas.edu/news/2008/05/21-002.php"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; reports on findings of one related study about cost/benefits on war on terrorism.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Copenhagen Consensus 2008 web site is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Default.aspx?ID=953"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;. (Appears that 2008 conclusions will be announced next week, look for additional news stories then).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-2326950923529834639?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/bvRyjryfROo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/bvRyjryfROo/copenhagen-consensus-to-rank.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/copenhagen-consensus-to-rank.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-278441186218241572</guid><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:46:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-21T09:23:48.545-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CBO</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cost estimate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">veterans</category><title>GI Education Bill Benefit Now 54% Below Inflation Adjusted Vietnam Era Benefit.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;As a strong supporter and prior user of the GI educational benefit, I have been interested in the growing political battle over the GI Bill, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-family: verdana;" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:s22:Current"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;S.22&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt; Senator McCain has opposed the expansion of benefits that this bill will provide while many other Congressional members support the expansion. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;I went back and looked at the cost levels for S.22, as detailed by the Congressional Budget Office. Their estimate &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.cbo.gov/cedirect.cfm?bill=s22&amp;amp;cong=110"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; is that the average benefit cost would be $90,000 for 36 months of benefits--4 years of college. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;I then went back and constructed a table &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/gibillcompare.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; showing what education benefits would be if Vietnam era benefit levels were adjusted, using the rate of college tuition inflation since 1970.  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;Three Conclusions: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;Current GI educational benefit levels are 54% below what they would be if they were at the same level of benefits available to Vietnam era veterans, after adjusting for tuition inflation. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;S. 22 benefits levels are somewhat more generous than called for by tuition inflation alone. Using CBO's benefit estimate of $90,000, the benefit provided by S.22 would be about 8% more--nearly $9,000 more- than what Vietnam era benefit levels would be adjusted through 2007 for tuition inflation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:verdana;"&gt;After inflation adjustments for 2008 are added, the proposed benefit levels in S. 22 are only marginally higher than they should be if they were adjusted only for tuition inflation since 1990. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-278441186218241572?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/OrD4m-rh6_k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/OrD4m-rh6_k/gi-education-bill-benefit-now-54-below.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><enclosure url="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/gibillcompare.pdf" length="257334" type="application/pdf" /><media:content url="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/gibillcompare.pdf" fileSize="257334" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>As a strong supporter and prior user of the GI educational benefit, I have been interested in the growing political battle over the GI Bill, S.22. Senator McCain has opposed the expansion of benefits that this bill will provide while many other Congressio</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>As a strong supporter and prior user of the GI educational benefit, I have been interested in the growing political battle over the GI Bill, S.22. Senator McCain has opposed the expansion of benefits that this bill will provide while many other Congressional members support the expansion. I went back and looked at the cost levels for S.22, as detailed by the Congressional Budget Office. Their estimate HERE is that the average benefit cost would be $90,000 for 36 months of benefits--4 years of college. I then went back and constructed a table HERE showing what education benefits would be if Vietnam era benefit levels were adjusted, using the rate of college tuition inflation since 1970. Three Conclusions: Current GI educational benefit levels are 54% below what they would be if they were at the same level of benefits available to Vietnam era veterans, after adjusting for tuition inflation. S. 22 benefits levels are somewhat more generous than called for by tuition inflation alone. Using CBO's benefit estimate of $90,000, the benefit provided by S.22 would be about 8% more--nearly $9,000 more- than what Vietnam era benefit levels would be adjusted through 2007 for tuition inflation.After inflation adjustments for 2008 are added, the proposed benefit levels in S. 22 are only marginally higher than they should be if they were adjusted only for tuition inflation since 1990. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>CBO, cost estimate, veterans</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/gi-education-bill-benefit-now-54-below.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-5277283936064824140</guid><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-05-20T10:09:48.313-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">congress</category><title>Oregon Congressional Members Net Worth--Smith Net Worth 85 Times Wu's.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;From &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Sunlight Foundation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;, new website shows net worth for Oregon congressional delegation &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://fortune535.sunlightprojects.org/state/or/"&gt;HERE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Gordon Smith is # 1 with net worth of more than $23 M.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;David Wu is last with net worth of $272k.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Average families net worth $93k&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Note: Sort of ALL members of Congress by net worth available &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://fortune535.sunlightprojects.org/bywealth/"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Highest net worth is by one of women members of Congress, Jane Harman from California, with a net worth of more than $409 million.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-5277283936064824140?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/npdAisLqGCU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/npdAisLqGCU/oregon-congressional-members-net-worth.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/05/oregon-congressional-members-net-worth.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-2597559834078018019</guid><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-22T10:01:11.165-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sunshine week</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FOIA</category><title>Sunshine Week Activities.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;Listing of activities/events&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.sunshineweek.org/"&gt; HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-2597559834078018019?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/_s8OxJZQX54" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/_s8OxJZQX54/sunshine-week-activities.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/03/sunshine-week-activities.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-5741462100583301460</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-09T11:04:00.753-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">GSE</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Realtors</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Freddie</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Fannie</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">lobbyists</category><title>U.S. Senate Data: Real Estate Lobbyists Spent $65M+ in 2007.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;From U.S. Senate lobbyist disclosure database at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a style="font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/overview.asp?txtindextype=s"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;opensecrets.org&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;Results for real estate industry are &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.opensecrets.org/lobbyists/indusclient.asp?code=F10&amp;amp;year=2007&amp;amp;sort=A"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt; Realtors, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;private mortgage insurance companies, Fannie, and Freddie top the list.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-5741462100583301460?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/mxe4SYcNIiI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/mxe4SYcNIiI/us-senate-data-real-estate-lobbyists.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/03/us-senate-data-real-estate-lobbyists.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-6816899408673307585</guid><pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-03-07T13:07:49.795-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">procurement</category><title>Air Force Tanker Procurement: CRS Report Has Facts.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Congressional members from Washington state are making a lot of noise about the recently announced decision to award a larger tanker contract to Northrup Grumman instead of Boeing. (It's only a matter of time IMO that Oregon lawmakers will be asked to weigh in on Boeing's behalf).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;For those interested more in the facts than the politics, the Congressional Research Survey issued a report &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://opencrs.cdt.org/getfile.php?rid=62843"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; at the end of February 2008 that does a good job of explaining what the procurement was intended to accomplish and the evaluation factors that were used in the procurement process. This report was issued before the procurement decision was announced.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-6816899408673307585?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/jgJo_g6N_wg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/jgJo_g6N_wg/air-force-tanker-procurement-crs-report.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/03/air-force-tanker-procurement-crs-report.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-8160549903773111284</guid><pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-28T07:37:39.259-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">clinton</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">elections</category><title>Slate's Delegate Calculator Shows Daunting Clinton Task Ahead.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Great use of web &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.slate.com/features/delegatecounter/"&gt;HERE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Using sliders, user can see pledged delegate counts that would result from different Democratic primary election results in all of the remaining primary states.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Even with a highly unlikely scenario, Obama still ends up with more pledged delegates. The scenario and results:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ul style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Clinton beats Obama by&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt; 60% to 40%&lt;/span&gt; in 4 primaries Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, and Puerto Rico AND by &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;54% to 46% in ALL of the other primaries.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Clinton ends up with 1,599 pledged delegates, but Obama &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;STILL has more&lt;/span&gt; pledged delegates at 1,610.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Both are short of the 2,025 delegates needed--that's where super delegates would come into play.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-8160549903773111284?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/kus5IrOKuWE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/kus5IrOKuWE/slates-delegate-calculator-shows.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/02/slates-delegate-calculator-shows.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-981464412498805705</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-21T08:35:11.250-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">senators</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">travel</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">staff costs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">representatives</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">federal legislation</category><title>Oregon Congresssional Delegation and Staff: Privately Financed Travel--Gordon and Earl In the Lead.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;From &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Legistorm,&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; shows all privately paid for member and staff trips and also includes link to show staff salaries paid. Free sign up allows you to view actual post disclosure form filed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;Note that many of these trips are from several years ago, but some are more current. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Clicking on the column headings sort data by that column--so you sort the date column for example to see the most recent trips first.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Privately Paid for trips&lt;/span&gt;, and their source for all Oregon Reps and Senators can be found &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip_browse_by_approver/index/state/OR.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt; in table format.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the years covered, Senator Smith, and his staff lead with 97 approved trips taken at a cost of $190,000+, with Rep. Blumenhauer coming close,with a much smaller district, with 70 approved trips for $156,000+&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Click on any individual Rep or Senator in left column to get more detailed information. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-981464412498805705?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/MaEIQWVHPsY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/MaEIQWVHPsY/oregon-congresssional-delegation-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/02/oregon-congresssional-delegation-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-1690834759127268107</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-11T11:14:24.659-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">primary</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">democratic</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">elections</category><title>Democratic ELECTED Delegate Counts and Comparisons.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;"  &gt;It is suprisingly difficult to find a breakout of elected delegate counts in the Democratic presidential contest. The Chicago Tribune Associated Press &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2008/by_state/delsuper_DEM.html?SITE=ILCHTELN&amp;amp;SECTION=POLITICS"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; has a breakout that shows total delegates, and super delegates, but NO count of the delegates elected in the primaries and caucuses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SO.... I took the Feb 11, 2008 AP total delegate count and subtracted their super delegates to get a breakout of what I call &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;elected delegates&lt;/span&gt;.   The results of this comparison are available as a PDF &lt;a style="color: rgb(204, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/021108apdelegatecounts.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="text-decoration: underline; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(204, 0, 0);"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;"  &gt;Obama leads in the count of elected delegates 952 to 893, a 12% lead.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;"  &gt;Obama has a total of 20 states where he won the elected delegate count and Senator Clinton has 15 states where she won--i.e , he has won a third more states than she has. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:verdana;font-size:85%;"  &gt;&lt;br /&gt;For the record--I am an Obama supporter and contributor. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-1690834759127268107?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/DhnAzP0RBFU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/DhnAzP0RBFU/democratic-elected-delegate-counts-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><enclosure url="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/021108apdelegatecounts.pdf" length="96810" type="application/pdf" /><media:content url="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/021108apdelegatecounts.pdf" fileSize="96810" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>It is suprisingly difficult to find a breakout of elected delegate counts in the Democratic presidential contest. The Chicago Tribune Associated Press HERE has a breakout that shows total delegates, and super delegates, but NO count of the delegates elect</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>It is suprisingly difficult to find a breakout of elected delegate counts in the Democratic presidential contest. The Chicago Tribune Associated Press HERE has a breakout that shows total delegates, and super delegates, but NO count of the delegates elected in the primaries and caucuses. SO.... I took the Feb 11, 2008 AP total delegate count and subtracted their super delegates to get a breakout of what I call elected delegates. The results of this comparison are available as a PDF HERE. Obama leads in the count of elected delegates 952 to 893, a 12% lead. Obama has a total of 20 states where he won the elected delegate count and Senator Clinton has 15 states where she won--i.e , he has won a third more states than she has. For the record--I am an Obama supporter and contributor. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>primary, democratic, elections</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/02/democratic-elected-delegate-counts-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-3280561601572140326</guid><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-27T10:36:17.494-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">federal legislation</category><title>Congressional Salaries and Allowances.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;New Congressional Research Service PDF report &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-family: verdana;" href="http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL30064_20070830.pdf"&gt;HERE. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;Haven't seen anything similar for Oregon legislators, have you?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-3280561601572140326?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/UvsP8ke5XSk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/UvsP8ke5XSk/congressional-salaries-and-allowances.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><enclosure url="http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL30064_20070830.pdf" length="106254" type="application/pdf" /><media:content url="http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/RL30064_20070830.pdf" fileSize="106254" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>New Congressional Research Service PDF report HERE. Haven't seen anything similar for Oregon legislators, have you? </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</itunes:author><itunes:summary>New Congressional Research Service PDF report HERE. Haven't seen anything similar for Oregon legislators, have you? </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>federal legislation</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/01/congressional-salaries-and-allowances.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-4679949275508368088</guid><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-01-02T09:14:11.730-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">S. 2488</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FOIA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">federal legislation</category><title>Federal Freedom of Information Act Amendments Signed Into Law.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;S. 2488 was recently signed into law by the President. The bill is seen generally as a push back against increasing secrecy during this administration. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;A good summary of its provisions can be found at this &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;GovTrack&lt;/span&gt;.US summary of the bill &lt;a style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-2488&amp;amp;tab=summary"&gt;HERE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;"&gt;An AP story on the bill can be found &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: verdana;" href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g2h-wOpWezQJGWaZ7AwxYmTJKxgAD8TSPOPG0"&gt;HERE. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-4679949275508368088?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/4UfyDnp9jbk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/4UfyDnp9jbk/federal-freedom-of-information-act.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2008/01/federal-freedom-of-information-act.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-648538807740910747</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-10-06T10:21:41.015-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">travel</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Oregon</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">congressional</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Legistorm</category><title>Site Provides Details on Privately Paid Congressional Travel Expenses (And More)</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/"&gt;Legistorm&lt;/a&gt; is a great site to see privately paid for travel by members of Congress &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;and &lt;/span&gt;their staffs. It includes Google maps and has additional links to bios, staff salaries, and personal finances. Can search by member, organization, or key word search. For example “Housing” as a key word works.&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;p style="font-family: verdana;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Privately Paid for Travel by Members of Oregon delegation: &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="font-family: verdana;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Senate &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Sen_Gordon_Smith/89.html"&gt;Gordon Smith&lt;/a&gt; &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Sen_Ron_Wyden/101.html"&gt;Ron Wyden&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="font-family: verdana;" class="MsoNormal"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;House&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Rep_Earl_Blumenauer/131.html"&gt;Earl Blumenauer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Rep_Peter_DeFazio/201.html"&gt;Peter DeFazio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Rep_Darlene_Hooley/288.html"&gt;Darlene Hooley&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in; font-family: verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Rep_Greg_Walden/521.html"&gt;Greg Walden&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: 0.5in;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: &amp;quot;Verdana&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;sans-serif&amp;quot;;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: verdana;font-size:85%;" &gt;&lt;a href="http://www.legistorm.com/trip/approver/Rep_David_Wu/541.html"&gt;David Wu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-648538807740910747?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/frBKOEAl7aw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/frBKOEAl7aw/site-provides-details-on-privately-paid.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2007/10/site-provides-details-on-privately-paid.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7129420178525190630.post-5664601875010936108</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-08-22T08:44:41.753-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">sunlight foundation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">O'Reilly Radar</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">legal opinion</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Internet Archive</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">malamaud</category><title>Expanding Availability of Federal Congressional Hearing Video</title><description>&lt;div  style="text-align: justify;font-family:verdana;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.sunlightfoundation.com/carl_malamud_strikes_again"&gt;The Sunlight Foundation&lt;/a&gt; has an interesting story about progress being made by Carl Malamaud to free federal congressional hearings video from CSPAN control and back into public domain.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Direct information about video hearings project progress can be found at Internet Archive &lt;a href="http://www.archive.org/details/us_congress"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;HERE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;; a direct link to a Google Video with Malmaud explaining the background of his efforts to make federal Congressional hearings available to the public is &lt;a style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2633159172413478267"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;font-size:100%;" &gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/08/carl_malamud_ta.html"&gt;O'Reilly Radar&lt;/a&gt; (not &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;font-size:100%;" &gt;that&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt; O'Reilly) adds details about additional Malamaud open government projects, including release of historical legal opinions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/7129420178525190630-5664601875010936108?l=opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~4/on5En0ymxPI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OpenGovernmentNewsAndIssuesOregon/~3/on5En0ymxPI/congressional-video-availability.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://opengovnewsoregon.blogspot.com/2007/08/congressional-video-availability.html</feedburner:origLink></item><language>en-us</language><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating></channel></rss>

