<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Lupton Fawcett LLP - Openbrief » Contract</title>
	
	<link>http://www.openbrief.com</link>
	<description>An update service from Lupton Fawcett LLP</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Openbrief_contract" /><feedburner:info uri="openbrief_contract" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="?format=xml" src="http://www.logos.com/media/blog/feedburner/browser_chicklet.png">Subscribe with Your Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Misleading Advertising - a recent ASA decision</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~3/x5KzKj-v5o0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Kingscott</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Advisory Services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Regulation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law &amp; Regulatory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dispute Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description>The ASA Council (Non-broadcast) has recently held a retailer in breach of the CAP Code for having insufficient stock to meet anticipated demand.  It found that internet retailer, Simply Be, has breached the CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 16.4 (Availability of products), 27.4 (Sales promotion rules) and 30.1 (Availability), by an email it [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~4/x5KzKj-v5o0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose law applies?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~3/lxjNhvpRRHQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/10/07/whose-law-applies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Kingscott</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Advisory Services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description>In a contract between parties situated in different countries, whose law applies? The answer is usually straightforward where the parties have signed a contract which states which law is to apply. In such cases, or where it can be implied that they have chosen a particular country&amp;#8217;s law, the chosen law applies. However, in cases [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~4/lxjNhvpRRHQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/10/07/whose-law-applies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/10/07/whose-law-applies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Contract assignment basics</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~3/gFAo0QYtOG0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/19/contract-assignment-basics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/19/contract-assignment-basics/</guid>
		<description>A contract in a basic sense can be seen as a benefit (often the payment of money) to one party and a burden (obligations) on the other. Of course, contracts are usually more complex than this with a series of interlinked benefits and burdens. But the concept of benefits and burdens is important to understanding when [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_contract/~4/gFAo0QYtOG0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/19/contract-assignment-basics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/19/contract-assignment-basics/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

