<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Lupton Fawcett LLP - Openbrief » Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution</title>
	
	<link>http://www.openbrief.com</link>
	<description>An update service from Lupton Fawcett LLP</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution" /><feedburner:info uri="openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="?format=xml" src="http://www.logos.com/media/blog/feedburner/browser_chicklet.png">Subscribe with Your Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Misleading Advertising - a recent ASA decision</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~3/x5KzKj-v5o0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fiona Kingscott</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Advisory Services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business Regulation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Competition Law &amp; Regulatory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dispute Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Miscellaneous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description>The ASA Council (Non-broadcast) has recently held a retailer in breach of the CAP Code for having insufficient stock to meet anticipated demand.  It found that internet retailer, Simply Be, has breached the CAP Code clauses 3.1 (Substantiation), 7.1 (Truthfulness), 16.4 (Availability of products), 27.4 (Sales promotion rules) and 30.1 (Availability), by an email it [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~4/x5KzKj-v5o0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2010/08/23/misleading-advertising-a-recent-asa-decision/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (”The Act”)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~3/vJmzVzqEd7k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/08/corporate-manslaughter-and-corporate-homicide-act-2007-the-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Davidson</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/08/corporate-manslaughter-and-corporate-homicide-act-2007-the-act/</guid>
		<description>The Act came into force on 6 April 2008.
Scope of the Act
An offence is committed under the Act if the way in which an organisation manages or organises its activities:-
(a)	causes a person&amp;#8217;s death and
(b)	amounts to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care owed by the organisation to the deceased.
Gross Breach
The statutory definition of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~4/vJmzVzqEd7k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/08/corporate-manslaughter-and-corporate-homicide-act-2007-the-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/08/corporate-manslaughter-and-corporate-homicide-act-2007-the-act/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Health &amp; Safety Risk Assessment of employees driving company motor vehicles</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~3/NZb-jVyyOCg/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/health-safety-risk-assessment-of-employees-driving-company-motor-vehicles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Forret</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/health-safety-risk-assessment-of-employees-driving-company-motor-vehicles/</guid>
		<description>An employer has a  duty to carry out a risk assessment in relation to employees who drive as part  of their company duties.  In order to  protect the company and the health and safety of employees it is a legal duty  of employers to carry out a thorough risk assessment of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~4/NZb-jVyyOCg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/health-safety-risk-assessment-of-employees-driving-company-motor-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/health-safety-risk-assessment-of-employees-driving-company-motor-vehicles/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Car seats – are your kids sitting legally?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~3/awH4UzDI-Z4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/car-seats-are-your-kids-sitting-legally/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tanya Forret</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Defence &amp; Prosecution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/car-seats-%e2%80%93-are-your-kids-sitting-legally/</guid>
		<description>Do you know the law regarding children and car seats? It is actually quite simple but please take note - in many situations it is the driver’s responsibility to ensure that the child is correctly restrained – if they are not, the driver will be legally liable. Also, the law and the type of child [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_corporate-defence-and-prosecution/~4/awH4UzDI-Z4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/car-seats-are-your-kids-sitting-legally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/car-seats-are-your-kids-sitting-legally/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

