<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Lupton Fawcett LLP - Openbrief » Intellectual Property</title>
	
	<link>http://www.openbrief.com</link>
	<description>An update service from Lupton Fawcett LLP</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Openbrief_intellectual-property" /><feedburner:info uri="openbrief_intellectual-property" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:feedFlare href="?format=xml" src="http://www.logos.com/media/blog/feedburner/browser_chicklet.png">Subscribe with Your Browser</feedburner:feedFlare><item>
		<title>Increase in counterfeit goods blocked by customs agencies</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/4fY8b3QvuL4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/07/14/increase-in-counterfeit-goods-blocked-by-customs-agencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description>The European commission has just issued a press release about the actions in 2008 by EU customs to enforce intellectual property rights at the external borders of the EU. The press release can be found here http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/1106&amp;#38;format=HTML&amp;#38;aged=0&amp;#38;language=EN&amp;#38;guiLanguage=en.
Detentions of counterfeit goods by Customs reached an all time high again - at 49, 000 - surpassing the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/4fY8b3QvuL4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/07/14/increase-in-counterfeit-goods-blocked-by-customs-agencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/07/14/increase-in-counterfeit-goods-blocked-by-customs-agencies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Confidential information and the ex-employee</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/c33aLhEFc1A/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/06/22/confidential-information-and-the-ex-employee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business Advisory Services]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=472</guid>
		<description>This old chestnut has been in court again. The law about what information in a business is regarded as confidential and so must not be taken or used by an ex-employee is complex. The practical effect of the law often seems at odds with commercial common sense depending on the circumstances. In the most recent [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/c33aLhEFc1A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/06/22/confidential-information-and-the-ex-employee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2009/06/22/confidential-information-and-the-ex-employee/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>UK government seeks to protect the British sausage</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/MONqk2jI5d0/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/08/11/uk-government-seeks-to-protect-the-british-sausage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description>Regular readers will recall the stories we posted about the Melton Mowbray pie being granted the status as a protected regional product and that the name Newcastle Brown Ale ceased to be a protected regional product as production was moved from the area where it had been brewed and become iconic. It is still a [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/MONqk2jI5d0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/08/11/uk-government-seeks-to-protect-the-british-sausage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/08/11/uk-government-seeks-to-protect-the-british-sausage/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Nike signs endorsement deal with race horse</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/qxUhbPZzrZo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/nike-signs-endorsement-deal-with-race-horse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description>Nike has signed an endorsement deal with US race horse, Big Brown, over seven years reported to be worth $80 million. Nike technicians created a unique horseshoe for Big Brown featuring Nike&amp;#8217;s patented air cushioning system using gas pressurised in an aluminium and polyurethane structure. Read more about this here http://www.theonion.com/content/news/nike_signs_big_brown_to_90_million &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/qxUhbPZzrZo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/nike-signs-endorsement-deal-with-race-horse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/nike-signs-endorsement-deal-with-race-horse/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Heirs take action to stop use of Steve McQueen name and likeness</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/z4vUhOJo57U/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/heirs-take-action-to-stop-use-of-steve-mcqueen-name-and-likeness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[image rights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[intangible assets]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[personalities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[privacy laws]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[protectable]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Steve McQueen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/?p=159</guid>
		<description>The heirs to the Steve McQueen legacy acting through family trusts have taken action in a New York court to prevent the use of the name &amp;#8216;Steve McQueen&amp;#8217; and his likeness by Belstaff USA Corp according to news reports from the US. The name and image are being used on various types of clothing such [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/z4vUhOJo57U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/heirs-take-action-to-stop-use-of-steve-mcqueen-name-and-likeness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/06/05/heirs-take-action-to-stop-use-of-steve-mcqueen-name-and-likeness/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Melton Mowbray Pork Pie</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/vX5n7T-LJDU/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/07/melton-mowbray-pork-pie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/07/melton-mowbray-pork-pie/</guid>
		<description>The Melton Mowbray Pork Pie Association have applied to register the name ‘Melton Mowbray Pork Pie’ as a protected geographical indication (PGI). The published application can be found at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:085:0017:0020:EN:PDF. The proposed geographical areas is around the town of Melton Mowbray but is defined by boundaries described by reference to various roads in the region. [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/vX5n7T-LJDU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/07/melton-mowbray-pork-pie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/04/07/melton-mowbray-pork-pie/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>View from India on IPR and indigenous peoples</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/NLg9S6UP5vk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/view-from-india-in-ipr-and-indigenous-peoples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 09:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/view-from-india-in-ipr-and-indigenous-peoples/</guid>
		<description>The advantage of extending the existing IPR system to protect traditional knowledge is that it will generate incentives amongst indigenous peoples to conserve and protect their culture and environment. This assumption is drawn from the experience of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander artists in Australia who obtained a national certification trademark which in turn [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/NLg9S6UP5vk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/view-from-india-in-ipr-and-indigenous-peoples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/view-from-india-in-ipr-and-indigenous-peoples/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Zapped for music tributes to Zappa</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/dVtoQA8wipQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/14/zapped-for-music-tributes-to-zappa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/14/zapped-for-music-tributes-to-zappa/</guid>
		<description>Frank Zappa died 14 years ago. Iconic to many people, his muisc has been and still is played by several tribute bands. Like the music of the Beatles, Presley and Abba. But the Zappa Family Trust is not happy about this according to a report in Herald-Review.com and its lawyers have sent letters of claim [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/dVtoQA8wipQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/14/zapped-for-music-tributes-to-zappa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/14/zapped-for-music-tributes-to-zappa/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Trade mark new year’s resolution</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/6vA1S97Fx54/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/11/trade-mark-new-years-resolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/11/trade-mark-new-years-resolution/</guid>
		<description>Why not start the new year with something positive. Check out the company name, logo or design or your product names or the brands used in your business and give them some real value - register a trade mark for them. The cost to apply is fixed, is a few hundred pounds not thousands, and the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/6vA1S97Fx54" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/11/trade-mark-new-years-resolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/11/trade-mark-new-years-resolution/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Pre contract negotiations irrelevant to understanding a contract</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/ga6tZ8KhIW8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/10/pre-contract-negotiations-irrelevant-to-understanding-a-contract/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/10/pre-contract-negotiations-irrelevant-to-understanding-a-contract/</guid>
		<description>Recently the English courts in the case of Eunetworks -v- Abovenet [2007] EWHC confirmed that the interpretation of a written contract in English law requires the court to read the words used in the contract, in any documents attached to it as part of the contract, and in any documents specifically made part of the [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/ga6tZ8KhIW8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/10/pre-contract-negotiations-irrelevant-to-understanding-a-contract/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/01/10/pre-contract-negotiations-irrelevant-to-understanding-a-contract/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Being realistic about intellectual property</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/m50RjprU_jo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/06/being-realistic-about-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/06/being-realistic-about-intellectual-property/</guid>
		<description>What is intellectual property? 
Intellectual Property can mean different things in different contexts.  In a strictly narrow legal sense, intellectual property means legal rights such as patents, trade marks and designs and confidential know-how.  In a commercial sense, intellectual property often includes more than this such as the general know-how in an organisation, [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/m50RjprU_jo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/06/being-realistic-about-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/06/being-realistic-about-intellectual-property/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Staying in control - designed in Europe, made in China</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~3/WmD6bt_znZQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/01/staying-in-control-designed-in-europe-made-in-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 09:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Sykes</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/01/staying-in-control-designed-in-europe-made-in-china/</guid>
		<description>European manufacturing cannot compete with the cheap labour costs in many countries such as China, Turkey, Vietnam and so on. Many products are now made in those countries and more will be in the future. However many product designs are created in Europe and the United Kingdom has a very good track record of design [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_intellectual-property/~4/WmD6bt_znZQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/01/staying-in-control-designed-in-europe-made-in-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/11/01/staying-in-control-designed-in-europe-made-in-china/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

