http://www.openbrief.com An update service from Lupton Fawcett LLP Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:17:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 en Subscribe with Your Browser http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_private-client/~3/pI40UtgMaG8/ http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/%e2%80%9cpre-nups%e2%80%9d-again/#comments Fri, 01 Feb 2008 16:11:06 +0000 Sally Clark http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/%e2%80%9cpre-nups%e2%80%9d-again/ Following on from our article published in October last year on the topic of “pre-nups” and “post-nups” we thought that it would be useful to provide a brief update. The issue of the “pre-nup” between Mr and Mrs Crossley came before the Court of Appeal in December of last year. The parties had both been [...]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_private-client/~4/pI40UtgMaG8" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/%e2%80%9cpre-nups%e2%80%9d-again/feed/ http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2008/02/01/%e2%80%9cpre-nups%e2%80%9d-again/ http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Openbrief_private-client/~3/XVUeh9xoK4c/ http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/pre-nuptial-agreements/#comments Mon, 08 Oct 2007 09:31:15 +0000 Anne Braithwaite http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/pre-nuptial-agreements/ These are headline news following recent cases like Charman with wealthy or the once bitten divorcee wanting damage limitation before marrying. Whilst the best advice (until they change the law on cohabitation) is “don’t do it”, there is a growing pressure to give ‘pre-nups’ and ‘post-nups’ more weight. What are they? [...]<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Openbrief_private-client/~4/XVUeh9xoK4c" height="1" width="1"/> http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/pre-nuptial-agreements/feed/ http://www.openbrief.com/index.php/2007/10/08/pre-nuptial-agreements/