<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2enclosuresfull.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 11:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Oregon Housing Blog</title><description /><link>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Tom Cusack)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1354</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OregonHousingBlog" /><media:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</media:keywords><itunes:owner><itunes:email>housepdx@gmail.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>Tom Cusack</itunes:name></itunes:owner><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>Oregon Housing Blog</itunes:subtitle><itunes:summary>A HOUSEPDX blog focused only on housing issues and news related to the state of Oregon.</itunes:summary><feedburner:emailServiceId>OregonHousingBlog</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-5665062216829405192</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-24T08:20:18.175-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">private mortgage insurance</category><title>Private Mortgage Insurance Companies Get Lump of Coal for Christmas With Credit Rating Downgrade.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Housing Wire&lt;/span&gt; has story &lt;a style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2009/12/23/sp-downgrades-five-mortgage-insurers/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HousingWire+%28HousingWire%29"&gt;HER&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housingwire.com/2009/12/23/sp-downgrades-five-mortgage-insurers/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+HousingWire+%28HousingWire%29"&gt;E&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-5665062216829405192?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=IJiKKNTFpss:wZFp71Fon7Q:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/IJiKKNTFpss" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/IJiKKNTFpss/private-mortgage-insurance-companies.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/private-mortgage-insurance-companies.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-8137237616840143869</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-23T16:17:42.701-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">RESPA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>HUD Publishes New Consumer RESPA Booklet.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;PDF of booklet &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;(&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Shopping for Your Home Loan&lt;/span&gt;) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.hud.gov/utilities/intercept.cfm?http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/documents/Settlement%20Booklet%20December%2015%20REVISED.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;HUD RESPA page is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/ramh/res/respa_hm.cfm"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-8137237616840143869?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=LC8cxEckKuM:XrCvf9N5izo:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/LC8cxEckKuM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/LC8cxEckKuM/hud-publishes-new-consumer-respa.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/hud-publishes-new-consumer-respa.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-2271867494354884293</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-26T10:35:34.919-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">chronic homeless</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>HUD Homeless Grants Announced, Oregon Gets $17.2 Million.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;HUD press release is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/press/press_releases_media_advisories/2009/HUDNo.09-239"&gt;HERE.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Excel file with Oregon grants is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/homeless/budget/2009/09_oregon_totals.xls"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;$17.2 Million for Oregon appears on the surface to be a significant reduction from &lt;a style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-weight: bold;" href="http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/02/hud-awards-oregon-grantees-nearly-213.html"&gt;$20.1 million for Oregon for FY 2008&lt;/a&gt;, however the number of multi-year grants can vary by year, so it is impossible to make an "apples to apples" comparison.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It also appears that this announcement may ONLY be for renewal grants and that NEW grants will not be announced until 2010. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Note also that Oregon received significant Recovery Act funding for homeless programs, so TOTAL HUD dollars for homeless programs this year is WAY up (2X+) compared to last.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-2271867494354884293?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=dQkqQilTYg0:gOtKVtlNaQk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/dQkqQilTYg0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/dQkqQilTYg0/hud-homeless-grants-announced-oregon.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/VeTfY4tmIYk/09_oregon_totals.xls" fileSize="35840" type="application/vnd.ms-excel" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>HUD press release is HERE. Excel file with Oregon grants is HERE. $17.2 Million for Oregon appears on the surface to be a significant reduction from $20.1 million for Oregon for FY 2008, however the number of multi-year grants can vary by year, so it is i</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>HUD press release is HERE. Excel file with Oregon grants is HERE. $17.2 Million for Oregon appears on the surface to be a significant reduction from $20.1 million for Oregon for FY 2008, however the number of multi-year grants can vary by year, so it is impossible to make an "apples to apples" comparison. It also appears that this announcement may ONLY be for renewal grants and that NEW grants will not be announced until 2010. Note also that Oregon received significant Recovery Act funding for homeless programs, so TOTAL HUD dollars for homeless programs this year is WAY up (2X+) compared to last. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/hud-homeless-grants-announced-oregon.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/VeTfY4tmIYk/09_oregon_totals.xls" length="35840" type="application/vnd.ms-excel" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/homeless/budget/2009/09_oregon_totals.xls</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-5111314058090454616</guid><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-23T11:00:16.422-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">waste fraud abuse</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>Correction: Improper Government Payment/Error Rate Transparency Heating Up; HUD Should Welcome.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Correction: I corrected text below to read that NET over payment errors were 1.6%, after underpayments were subtracted from over payments.&lt;br /&gt;----------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In late November the President issued a new Executive Order that will require Internet publication of improper payment data by federal agencies by May 2009. The Executive Order is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/executive-order-reducing-improper-payments"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Government Executive&lt;/span&gt; news story &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/1109/111809e1.htm"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; includes a PDF table &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/111809e1.pdf"&gt;HERE &lt;/a&gt;showing error rates for select agencies and programs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You will see that HUD's 3.5% error rate (total gross errors/total dollars spent)  compares very favorably to error rates for other federal programs. (Gross Error rates include both over and underpayment, if underpayments were &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;subtracted&lt;/span&gt; from overpayments, HUD &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;rental assistance NET overpayments&lt;/span&gt; would be only 1.6%--$453 Million out of $29 Billion in payments).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In contrast to the low error rates for HUD and many other programs check out HIGH program error rates for:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 490px; height: 304px;" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;col style="width: 154pt;" width="205"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 83pt;" width="111"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 91pt;" width="121"&gt;  &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl64" style="height: 16.5pt; width: 154pt; font-weight: bold;" height="22" width="205"&gt;Program&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-left: medium none; width: 83pt; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;" width="111"&gt;Error Rate&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-left: medium none; width: 91pt; font-weight: bold; text-align: center;" width="121"&gt;Total Errors&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Medicaid&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;9.6%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$18,075 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Unemployment&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;10.3%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$12,283 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Earned Income   Tax Credit&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;25.5%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$12,250 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Medicare   Advantage&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;15.4%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$12,010 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;SSI.&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;12.1%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$5,437 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;School   Lunches&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;16.4%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$1,551 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl64" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt; font-weight: bold;" height="22"&gt;HUD Rental   Assistance&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"&gt;3.5%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;"&gt;$1,022 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;VA   pensions&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;11.2%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$425 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Homeland   Security Grants&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;18.8%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$261 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl63" style="border-top: medium none; height: 16.5pt;" height="22"&gt;Disaster   Assistance Loans&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;20.9%&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;$169 &lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;(Why improper payments for Defense contracting do not appear at all on the list is a mystery to me).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Detailed HUD data on improper payments is found within the FY 2009 PAR that I recently posted about; discussion about HUD improper payments start on &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/hudfy2009par.pdf#page=343"&gt;page 343&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Note that HUD income reporting errors are on the rise and will likely receive increased attention in the future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;All in all I think this is a VERY good tool that should improve transparency and allow easier comparison between error rates in different programs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-5111314058090454616?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=b1uTgpRByfQ:_qLpzef7bgE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/b1uTgpRByfQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/b1uTgpRByfQ/improper-government-paymenterror-rate.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/FXi4lQJR6Ug/111809e1.pdf" fileSize="25915" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Correction: I corrected text below to read that NET over payment errors were 1.6%, after underpayments were subtracted from over payments. ---------- In late November the President issued a new Executive Order that will require Internet publication of imp</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Correction: I corrected text below to read that NET over payment errors were 1.6%, after underpayments were subtracted from over payments. ---------- In late November the President issued a new Executive Order that will require Internet publication of improper payment data by federal agencies by May 2009. The Executive Order is HERE. A Government Executive news story HERE includes a PDF table HERE showing error rates for select agencies and programs. You will see that HUD's 3.5% error rate (total gross errors/total dollars spent) compares very favorably to error rates for other federal programs. (Gross Error rates include both over and underpayment, if underpayments were subtracted from overpayments, HUD rental assistance NET overpayments would be only 1.6%--$453 Million out of $29 Billion in payments). In contrast to the low error rates for HUD and many other programs check out HIGH program error rates for: Program Error Rate Total Errors Medicaid 9.6% $18,075 Unemployment 10.3% $12,283 Earned Income Tax Credit 25.5% $12,250 Medicare Advantage 15.4% $12,010 SSI. 12.1% $5,437 School Lunches 16.4% $1,551 HUD Rental Assistance 3.5% $1,022 VA pensions 11.2% $425 Homeland Security Grants 18.8% $261 Disaster Assistance Loans 20.9% $169 (Why improper payments for Defense contracting do not appear at all on the list is a mystery to me). Detailed HUD data on improper payments is found within the FY 2009 PAR that I recently posted about; discussion about HUD improper payments start on page 343. Note that HUD income reporting errors are on the rise and will likely receive increased attention in the future. All in all I think this is a VERY good tool that should improve transparency and allow easier comparison between error rates in different programs. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/improper-government-paymenterror-rate.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/FXi4lQJR6Ug/111809e1.pdf" length="25915" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.govexec.com/pdfs/111809e1.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-8090881021859756491</guid><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-18T08:57:28.145-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">budget</category><title>HUD's FY 2009 Performance and Accountability Report; One Table Shows Loss of 44K HUD Assisted Units from FY 06-09.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;The FY 2009 HUD Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) was recently posted  &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/hudfy2009par.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; on the HUD website.  &lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;It's long but highly recommeneded.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As an example of the important details found in the report, &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/hudaassistedunitsfy20062009.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; is a table I constructed from data in the report; table shows the loss of 44,000 HUD assisted units from FY 2006-FY 2009.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-8090881021859756491?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=yrSDzhNUhOc:xy8qN3xuGDU:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/yrSDzhNUhOc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/yrSDzhNUhOc/huds-fy-2009-performance-and.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pP9ZwiAwZPM/hudfy2009par.pdf" fileSize="5292696" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The FY 2009 HUD Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) was recently posted HERE on the HUD website. It's long but highly recommeneded. As an example of the important details found in the report, HERE is a table I constructed from data in the report; </itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>The FY 2009 HUD Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) was recently posted HERE on the HUD website. It's long but highly recommeneded. As an example of the important details found in the report, HERE is a table I constructed from data in the report; table shows the loss of 44,000 HUD assisted units from FY 2006-FY 2009. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/huds-fy-2009-performance-and.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pP9ZwiAwZPM/hudfy2009par.pdf" length="5292696" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/hudfy2009par.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-2643294237713522556</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-17T08:04:47.328-08:00</atom:updated><title>Two HUD Programs Make Top 10 List of Federal Assistance Programs.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;New GAO report &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10263.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; discusses the factors used to allocate funding for the top 10 largest federal assistance programs. For 2008 those programs and obligation amounts included two HUD programs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;Housing Choice Vouchers and&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;The combined Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)/and Neighborhood Stabilization Programs (NSP).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 448px; height: 380px;" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;col style="width: 214pt;" width="285"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 77pt;" width="102"&gt;  &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Program &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Amount obligated&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Medicaid   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font9"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;$214.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Highway   Planning and Construction &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font9"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;37.4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;TANF &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font9"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;17.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; font-weight: bold;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Section   8 Housing Choice Vouchers &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font10"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;15.6&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Title   I Grants to Local Education Agencies &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;13.9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;IDEA   Part B &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;11.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Federal   Transit Formula Grants Programs &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;8.2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Head   Start &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;6.9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;CHIP &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;6.0&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl67" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; font-weight: bold;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;CDBG   and Neighborhood Stabilization Program &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center; font-weight: bold;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;4.9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15pt; width: 214pt; font-family: trebuchet ms;" height="20" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Total   &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; font-family: trebuchet ms; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=";font-size:100%;" &gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;$334.9&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font5"  style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-2643294237713522556?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=PLlKzxvKKkk:6Oudl1CtSS8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/PLlKzxvKKkk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/PLlKzxvKKkk/two-hud-programs-make-top-10-list-of.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/cjg5QPHjq7I/d10263.pdf" fileSize="336528" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>New GAO report HERE discusses the factors used to allocate funding for the top 10 largest federal assistance programs. For 2008 those programs and obligation amounts included two HUD programs Housing Choice Vouchers andThe combined Community Development B</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>New GAO report HERE discusses the factors used to allocate funding for the top 10 largest federal assistance programs. For 2008 those programs and obligation amounts included two HUD programs Housing Choice Vouchers andThe combined Community Development Block Grants (CDBG)/and Neighborhood Stabilization Programs (NSP). Program Amount obligated Medicaid $214.0 Highway Planning and Construction 37.4 TANF 17.0 Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers 15.6 Title I Grants to Local Education Agencies 13.9 IDEA Part B 11.0 Federal Transit Formula Grants Programs 8.2 Head Start 6.9 CHIP 6.0 CDBG and Neighborhood Stabilization Program 4.9 Total $334.9 Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/two-hud-programs-make-top-10-list-of.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/cjg5QPHjq7I/d10263.pdf" length="336528" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10263.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-1048907511443082630</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-17T07:49:10.388-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">metro</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Portland</category><title>Brookings MetroMonitor Shows Portland Economy Under Performing Relative to 100 Metro Area Average.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Brookings &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.brookings.edu/metro/MetroMonitor.aspx"&gt;MetroMonitor&lt;/a&gt; compares metropolitan performance for 100 largest metro areas on a quarterly basis in areas like employment/unemployment, changes in domestic product, housing prices, and REO.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Portland metro profile is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.brookings.edu/%7E/media/Files/Programs/Metro/metro_monitor/metro_profiles/portland_or_metro_profile.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; and table pasted below, you will see that Portland is under performing the average for metro areas in ALL metrics, except for the metric "REOs per 1,000 mortgageable properties".&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 672px; height: 499px;" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"&gt;&lt;col style="width: 214pt;" width="285"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 77pt;" width="102"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 48pt;" width="64"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 72pt;" width="96"&gt;  &lt;col style="width: 78pt;" width="104"&gt;  &lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr style="height: 31.5pt;" height="42"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="height: 31.5pt; width: 214pt;" height="42" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;" class="font5"&gt;Employment &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"&gt;Portland &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-left: medium none; width: 48pt; text-align: center;" width="64"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"&gt;Rank* &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-left: medium none; width: 72pt; text-align: center;" width="96"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"&gt;100-metro average &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-left: medium none; width: 78pt; text-align: center;" width="104"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font7"&gt;U.S. average &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 31.5pt;" height="42"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl64" style="border-top: medium none; height: 31.5pt; width: 214pt;" height="42" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;Change   in employment from peak (2008Q1) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-5.9 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 48pt; text-align: center;" width="64"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;70 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 72pt; text-align: center;" width="96"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-4.3 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 78pt; text-align: center;" width="104"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-4.6 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;One-quarter change in   employment &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-0.9 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;81 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-0.5 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-0.5 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;" class="font5"&gt;Unemployment &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;Unemployment rate &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;10.7 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;73 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;9.6 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;9.5 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 31.5pt;" height="42"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl64" style="border-top: medium none; height: 31.5pt; width: 214pt;" height="42" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;One-year   percentage point change in unemployment rate &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;5.0 points &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 48pt; text-align: center;" width="64"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;90 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 72pt; text-align: center;" width="96"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;3.6 points &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 78pt; text-align: center;" width="104"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;3.5 points &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;" class="font5"&gt;Gross metropolitan   product (GMP) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;Change in GMP from peak   (2008Q2) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-5.5 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;84 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-2.4% &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-2.5% &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;One-quarter change in   GMP &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-0.1 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;93 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;0.8% &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;0.8 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;" class="font5"&gt;Housing prices &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;One-year change in   housing prices &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-6.0 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;79 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-3.0 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;-1.3 % &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;" class="font5"&gt;Real estate owned   properties (REOs) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl69" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl65" style="border-top: medium none; height: 15.75pt;" height="21"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;REOs per 1,000   mortgageable properties &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;2.89 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;58 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;4.32 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl68" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;3.51 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt;  &lt;tr style="height: 31.5pt;" height="42"&gt;   &lt;td class="xl64" style="border-top: medium none; height: 31.5pt; width: 214pt;" height="42" width="285"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;One-quarter   change in REOs per 1,000 mortgageable properties &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 77pt; text-align: center;" width="102"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;0.57 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 48pt; text-align: center;" width="64"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;91 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 72pt; text-align: center;" width="96"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;0.17 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;   &lt;td class="xl66" style="border-top: medium none; border-left: medium none; width: 78pt; text-align: center;" width="104"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font8"&gt;0.20 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="font6"&gt;&lt;span style=""&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/td&gt;  &lt;/tr&gt; &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-1048907511443082630?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=hK6uwXDo7kA:gH2Cpv_PcXk:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/hK6uwXDo7kA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/hK6uwXDo7kA/brookings-metromonitor-shows-portland.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/SpA-hJ5O3Jc/portland_or_metro_profile.pdf" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Brookings MetroMonitor compares metropolitan performance for 100 largest metro areas on a quarterly basis in areas like employment/unemployment, changes in domestic product, housing prices, and REO. Portland metro profile is HERE and table pasted below, y</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Brookings MetroMonitor compares metropolitan performance for 100 largest metro areas on a quarterly basis in areas like employment/unemployment, changes in domestic product, housing prices, and REO. Portland metro profile is HERE and table pasted below, you will see that Portland is under performing the average for metro areas in ALL metrics, except for the metric "REOs per 1,000 mortgageable properties". Employment Portland Rank* 100-metro average U.S. average Change in employment from peak (2008Q1) -5.9 % 70 -4.3 % -4.6 % One-quarter change in employment -0.9 % 81 -0.5 % -0.5 % Unemployment Unemployment rate 10.7 % 73 9.6 % 9.5 % One-year percentage point change in unemployment rate 5.0 points 90 3.6 points 3.5 points Gross metropolitan product (GMP) Change in GMP from peak (2008Q2) -5.5 % 84 -2.4% -2.5% One-quarter change in GMP -0.1 % 93 0.8% 0.8 % Housing prices One-year change in housing prices -6.0 % 79 -3.0 % -1.3 % Real estate owned properties (REOs) REOs per 1,000 mortgageable properties 2.89 58 4.32 3.51 One-quarter change in REOs per 1,000 mortgageable properties 0.57 91 0.17 0.20 Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/brookings-metromonitor-shows-portland.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/SpA-hJ5O3Jc/portland_or_metro_profile.pdf" length="-1" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.brookings.edu/%7E/media/Files/Programs/Metro/metro_monitor/metro_profiles/portland_or_metro_profile.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-6558465925526608152</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-16T11:50:52.699-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">off topic</category><title>Off Topic: Private Contractor Workforce in Afghanistan.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;Interesting &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;TPM&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt; story &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/afghanistan_contractors_new_congressional_study.php?ref=mp"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Congressional Research Service report is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40764_20091214.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;. Report projects 120-160,000 contract employees in Afghanistan, mostly locals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;g&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-6558465925526608152?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=ZKH0IvDtBOM:eKeZCUy2-XQ:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/ZKH0IvDtBOM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/ZKH0IvDtBOM/off-topic-private-contractor-workforce.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/uoH8sy07W40/R40764_20091214.pdf" fileSize="299417" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Interesting TPM story HERE. Congressional Research Service report is HERE. Report projects 120-160,000 contract employees in Afghanistan, mostly locals. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Interesting TPM story HERE. Congressional Research Service report is HERE. Report projects 120-160,000 contract employees in Afghanistan, mostly locals. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/off-topic-private-contractor-workforce.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/uoH8sy07W40/R40764_20091214.pdf" length="299417" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40764_20091214.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-6400669932013200679</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-16T06:13:51.850-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">twitter</category><title>OHCS Begins Trial Tweets.</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.funbumperstickers.com/images/tweety-bird_1.gif"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 143px; height: 139px;" src="http://www.funbumperstickers.com/images/tweety-bird_1.gif" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;A little bird told me....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sign up for their trial tweet &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://twitter.com/ohcs_oregon"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the&lt;a href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt; &lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;Oregon Housing Blo&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;g&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-6400669932013200679?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=Zl6CoFkNDHg:R8r2rmJmULY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/Zl6CoFkNDHg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/Zl6CoFkNDHg/ohcs-begins-trial-tweets.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/ohcs-begins-trial-tweets.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-624672331609007151</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-16T04:52:33.407-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">housing trust fund</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">jobs</category><title>Jobs Bill Severed from Defense Appropriations Action this Week, Moves to Slow Track.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;So says &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Hill&lt;/span&gt; story &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://thehill.com/homenews/house/72439-house-drops-plan-to-package-jobs-bill-with-defense-appropriations-measure"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;; means that Housing Trust and Public Housing Capital Grant funding will be on a much slower track, and may indeed not pass at all in the Senate,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-624672331609007151?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=fOIQ3xtbE6A:wWQycky789o:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/fOIQ3xtbE6A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/fOIQ3xtbE6A/jobs-bill-severed-from-defense.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/jobs-bill-severed-from-defense.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-126449907914038342</guid><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 07:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-15T23:42:38.215-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">housing trust fund</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FY 2010</category><title>House Jobs Bill Amendment Includes $2 Billion For Public Housing Capital Grants and New Housing Trust Fund.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;The House Rules Committee has posted amendments to the House Defense Appropriations bill to be considered by the House this week. They include $1 Billion in additional HUD Capital Grant program funding and $1 Billion+ for the new Housing Trust Fund.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not clear as to what will finally pass the House or Senate or when, but HUD provisions are in the amendment&lt;span style="color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.rules.house.gov/111/LegText/111_hr2847hamndsamnd.pdf#page=50"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; titled &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2847 - Jobs for Main Street Act, 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-126449907914038342?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=Sef-cMUa3m4:c39sYTb0w9w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/Sef-cMUa3m4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/Sef-cMUa3m4/house-jobs-bill-amendment-includes-2.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/VQFZ6wr4jnA/111_hr2847hamndsamnd.pdf" fileSize="239305" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>The House Rules Committee has posted amendments to the House Defense Appropriations bill to be considered by the House this week. They include $1 Billion in additional HUD Capital Grant program funding and $1 Billion+ for the new Housing Trust Fund. Not c</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>The House Rules Committee has posted amendments to the House Defense Appropriations bill to be considered by the House this week. They include $1 Billion in additional HUD Capital Grant program funding and $1 Billion+ for the new Housing Trust Fund. Not clear as to what will finally pass the House or Senate or when, but HUD provisions are in the amendment HERE titled House Amendment to the Senate Amendment to H.R. 2847 - Jobs for Main Street Act, 2010. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/house-jobs-bill-amendment-includes-2.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/VQFZ6wr4jnA/111_hr2847hamndsamnd.pdf" length="239305" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.rules.house.gov/111/LegText/111_hr2847hamndsamnd.pdf#page=50</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-8377345460172620748</guid><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-15T07:43:59.836-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Excel</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">multifamily</category><title>My Newly Constructed Excel HUD Multifamily REAC Database Allows Retrieval of All Inspection Scores by Year.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;I have constructed a new Excel database &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/excel/housing/hudmfreacscores121509.xlsx"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; showing ALL HUD Multifamily REAC inspection scores as of today, with a breakout for Oregon. I took HUD data and added a (calendar) YEAR field to make viewing inspections by year easier to see.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The default view in the pivot table I constructed shows an alpha list of Oregon properties and a count of inspections by year; double clicking on the count for a specific property IN a specific year will extract the data for that year in a separate worksheet showing you the REAC score(s) for that year. (Data for Oregon shows 107 REAC inspections this year). You can use other filters to extract data for other states, as well as by metro area and county name.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because of the large number or records the file I created is in Excel 2007 format.Some users report when they save Excel 2007 files they end up with a compressed .zip file extension. My suggestion is to RIGHT CLICK and save the file to your PC. Then navigate to the file you downloaded and look at its file extension. IF it appears as .ZIP extension, change the .ZIP extension to Excel 2007 extension (.xlsx), and THEN open the file with Excel 2007.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After downloading and opening look at the READ ME tab to see additional notes, and link to the HUD web page where I downloaded the data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-8377345460172620748?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=wYAjdnA74gc:aNAM0LoR_n8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/wYAjdnA74gc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/wYAjdnA74gc/my-newly-constructed-excel-hud.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/my-newly-constructed-excel-hud.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-2103396789862384703</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-15T06:15:25.152-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">safe</category><title>Updated: HUD SAFE Act Responsibilities Proposed Rule to be Published in FR Tomorrow.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Update: Federal Register link to proposed regulation, from Tuesday Dec 15th., is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-29708.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;----------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Look in tomorrow's /Tuesday Federal Register, an advance copy is available &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-29708_PI.pdf"&gt;HER&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-29708_PI.pdf"&gt;E&lt;/a&gt; (Link will not work after Monday).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In addition to establishing HUD’s responsibilities under the SAFE Act, through this rule, HUD proposes to clarify or interpret certain statutory provisions that pertain to the scope of the SAFE Act licensing requirements, and other requirements that pertain to the implementation, oversight, and enforcement responsibilities of the states.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-2103396789862384703?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=YLLeRp-7sw4:TgXysQgD1J4:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/YLLeRp-7sw4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/YLLeRp-7sw4/hud-safe-act-responsibilities-proposed.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/t97ZXWDj7KM/E9-29708.pdf" fileSize="141344" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Update: Federal Register link to proposed regulation, from Tuesday Dec 15th., is HERE. ---------- Look in tomorrow's /Tuesday Federal Register, an advance copy is available HERE (Link will not work after Monday). In addition to establishing HUD’s responsi</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Update: Federal Register link to proposed regulation, from Tuesday Dec 15th., is HERE. ---------- Look in tomorrow's /Tuesday Federal Register, an advance copy is available HERE (Link will not work after Monday). In addition to establishing HUD’s responsibilities under the SAFE Act, through this rule, HUD proposes to clarify or interpret certain statutory provisions that pertain to the scope of the SAFE Act licensing requirements, and other requirements that pertain to the implementation, oversight, and enforcement responsibilities of the states.Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/hud-safe-act-responsibilities-proposed.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/t97ZXWDj7KM/E9-29708.pdf" length="141344" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-29708.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-5553491428532183799</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-14T09:13:43.700-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">regulation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>Updated: HUD's Fall 2009 Semi Annual Regulatory Agenda Includes 60 Regulatory Actions.</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://images.google.com/url?source=imgres&amp;amp;ct=img&amp;amp;q=http://supplementalscience.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/fedreg.gif&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWFqyxmlkXIpC2j5QJ5Tw-p0s9AA"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 201px; height: 277px;" src="http://images.google.com/url?source=imgres&amp;amp;ct=img&amp;amp;q=http://supplementalscience.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/fedreg.gif&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFWFqyxmlkXIpC2j5QJ5Tw-p0s9AA" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Update: Link &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.reginfo.gov/public/jsp/eAgenda/StaticContent/200910/Statement_2500.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; is to HUD narrative about their regulatory priorities&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;br /&gt;Semi Annual Regulatory Agenda was published about a week ago; as usual HUD provided little notice of publication. Semi Annual agenda provides recap of status of regulations, including completed and planned actions. Primary value for me has been to provide a roadmap of future actions, and sometimes a revelation that a rule has been published that I overlooked.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Links to details for each of the 60 regulatory actions are live in the PDF file I constructed &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/hudsemiannualregulatoryagenda1209.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-5553491428532183799?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=gVbAsPjS5XQ:giZjBbk08Hs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/gVbAsPjS5XQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/gVbAsPjS5XQ/huds-fall-2009-semi-annual-regulatory.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/MPMTYReqV_g/hudsemiannualregulatoryagenda1209.pdf" fileSize="87833" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Update: Link HERE is to HUD narrative about their regulatory priorities. Semi Annual Regulatory Agenda was published about a week ago; as usual HUD provided little notice of publication. Semi Annual agenda provides recap of status of regulations, includin</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Update: Link HERE is to HUD narrative about their regulatory priorities. Semi Annual Regulatory Agenda was published about a week ago; as usual HUD provided little notice of publication. Semi Annual agenda provides recap of status of regulations, including completed and planned actions. Primary value for me has been to provide a roadmap of future actions, and sometimes a revelation that a rule has been published that I overlooked. Links to details for each of the 60 regulatory actions are live in the PDF file I constructed HERE. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog. </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/huds-fall-2009-semi-annual-regulatory.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/MPMTYReqV_g/hudsemiannualregulatoryagenda1209.pdf" length="87833" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/hudsemiannualregulatoryagenda1209.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-3666329911820885287</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-15T13:12:00.239-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FY 2010</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">appropriations</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>Updated-HUD, DOT, Etc. FY 2010 Appropriations  Bill On Way to President for Signature.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Update:&lt;br /&gt;Link to clean copy of PDF of Conference Report is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_reports&amp;amp;docid=f:hr366.111.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;The actual clean copy text of the complete omnibus bill is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_bills&amp;amp;docid=f:h3288enr.txt.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;---------------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senate vote was Sunday afternoon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Links from my prior post:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;blockquote  style="font-style: italic;font-family:trebuchet ms;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Document &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://docs.house.gov/rules/omni2010/hr3288cr_diva_jes.pdf#page=89"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; should open to the HUD Section of the bill conference committee explanation.(Summary table of HUD amounts runs from PDF pages 283-296).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actual legislative language is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://docs.house.gov/rules/omni2010/hr3288cr_diva_txt.pdf#page=114"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;, HUD Section starts at page 114, ends at page 212.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Both conference report and bill links above include handwritten comments, mark outs etc. Eventually cleaner versions of both will appear at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Thomas website for bill (H.R. 3288); link is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.03288:"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-3666329911820885287?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=4EFaMn2yP-A:RGRmx4ejg0g:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/4EFaMn2yP-A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/4EFaMn2yP-A/hud-dot-etc-fy-2010-appropriations-bill.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/a26WAfi8znw/getdoc.cgi" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Update: Link to clean copy of PDF of Conference Report is HERE. The actual clean copy text of the complete omnibus bill is HERE. --------------- Senate vote was Sunday afternoon. Links from my prior post: Document HERE should open to the HUD Section of th</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Update: Link to clean copy of PDF of Conference Report is HERE. The actual clean copy text of the complete omnibus bill is HERE. --------------- Senate vote was Sunday afternoon. Links from my prior post: Document HERE should open to the HUD Section of the bill conference committee explanation.(Summary table of HUD amounts runs from PDF pages 283-296). Actual legislative language is HERE, HUD Section starts at page 114, ends at page 212. (Both conference report and bill links above include handwritten comments, mark outs etc. Eventually cleaner versions of both will appear at Thomas website for bill (H.R. 3288); link is HERE).Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/hud-dot-etc-fy-2010-appropriations-bill.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/a26WAfi8znw/getdoc.cgi" length="-1" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_cong_reports&amp;amp;docid=f:hr366.111.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-7274671798023929413</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-12T17:52:11.596-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">housing trust fund</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">project based vouchers</category><title>More Details on Amendment to Add Housing Trust Fund to Defense Appropriations, Including Project Based Vouchers.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;Culled this from (&lt;/span&gt;Connecticut&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic; font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;Partnership for Strong Communities&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt; website &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: trebuchet ms;" href="http://www.ctpartnershiphousing.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;amp;task=view&amp;amp;id=1312&amp;amp;Itemid=40"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;Amendment is &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: trebuchet ms;" href="http://www.ctpartnershiphousing.com/images/stories/PDF/nhtfamendment12-11-09.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;; would provide $1 Billion AND $65,000,000 for project based vouchers OR project based assistance.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); font-family: trebuchet ms;" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;"&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-7274671798023929413?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=Nkql2A5CuJc:tbPfQUSNFUY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/Nkql2A5CuJc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/Nkql2A5CuJc/more-details-on-amendment-to-add.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/WigqNEEAt4s/nhtfamendment12-11-09.pdf" fileSize="24992" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Culled this from (Connecticut) Partnership for Strong Communities website HERE. Amendment is HERE; would provide $1 Billion AND $65,000,000 for project based vouchers OR project based assistance. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Culled this from (Connecticut) Partnership for Strong Communities website HERE. Amendment is HERE; would provide $1 Billion AND $65,000,000 for project based vouchers OR project based assistance. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/more-details-on-amendment-to-add.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/WigqNEEAt4s/nhtfamendment12-11-09.pdf" length="24992" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.ctpartnershiphousing.com/images/stories/PDF/nhtfamendment12-11-09.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-9114980410530595050</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-12T14:17:28.803-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">metro</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">audio</category><title>Audio of Dec. 10th Portland Metro Council Consideration of Urban Growth Report, With Testimony.</title><description>&lt;a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.rfsearch.com/images/new_iphone.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 125px; height: 165px;" src="http://www.rfsearch.com/images/new_iphone.jpg" alt="" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;I have created an edit of the Metro audio file from the Dec. 10th Council hearing. The discussion of the Urban Growth resolution begins at about 45 seconds into the MP3 audio file &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/multimedia/mp3/housing/metro121009councilmeetingugr.mp3"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;. (File is 62 MB's).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-9114980410530595050?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=7LyJw8EmZMQ:1nJC626Fc1M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/7LyJw8EmZMQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/7LyJw8EmZMQ/audio-of-dec-10th-portland-metro.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/tfBjEdccdSI/metro121009councilmeetingugr.mp3" fileSize="63594916" type="audio/mpeg" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>I have created an edit of the Metro audio file from the Dec. 10th Council hearing. The discussion of the Urban Growth resolution begins at about 45 seconds into the MP3 audio file HERE. (File is 62 MB's). Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housin</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>I have created an edit of the Metro audio file from the Dec. 10th Council hearing. The discussion of the Urban Growth resolution begins at about 45 seconds into the MP3 audio file HERE. (File is 62 MB's). Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/audio-of-dec-10th-portland-metro.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/tfBjEdccdSI/metro121009councilmeetingugr.mp3" length="63594916" type="audio/mpeg" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.housepdx.com/multimedia/mp3/housing/metro121009councilmeetingugr.mp3</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-5909585867731493728</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-12T13:24:07.339-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FY 2010</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>NLIHC's Budget Chart for $46 Billion in FY 2010 HUD Appropriations Bill.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;Bill still requires Senate action (which may occur this weekend), but NLIHC budget table is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.nlihc.org/doc/FY10-chart-12-9-09.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-5909585867731493728?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=baXfFKDb6p8:kxLCtwupAAA:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/baXfFKDb6p8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/baXfFKDb6p8/nlihcs-budget-chart-for-46-billion-in.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pLPCxUk9uZQ/FY10-chart-12-9-09.pdf" fileSize="168242" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Bill still requires Senate action (which may occur this weekend), but NLIHC budget table is HERE. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Bill still requires Senate action (which may occur this weekend), but NLIHC budget table is HERE. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/nlihcs-budget-chart-for-46-billion-in.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pLPCxUk9uZQ/FY10-chart-12-9-09.pdf" length="168242" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.nlihc.org/doc/FY10-chart-12-9-09.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-2681851555879076586</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-16T10:07:05.830-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">loan modification</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">single family</category><title>Updated: New Loan Mod Report Shows 681 Loan Mods in Oregon During November</title><description>&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Updated: Dawned on me that loan mods are processed during work days. In November there were a total of 19 workdays (M-F, and excluding two Federal holidays). That works out to &lt;span style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;"&gt;35-36 loan mods per workday for November.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;---------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have created a report which now has a table showing monthly changes as well as monthly tables with state totals and state share of all loan mods.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Three page PDF file is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; font-family: trebuchet ms; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/112009mhastateloanmods.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;, shows Oregon has a total of 8,241 mods through November, with 681 added during the month or about 22-23 a day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-2681851555879076586?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=L6PKLopmYPw:zIFyMGyhPHs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/L6PKLopmYPw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/L6PKLopmYPw/new-loan-mod-report-shows-681-loan-mods.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/8nDs8IvqZbc/112009mhastateloanmods.pdf" fileSize="78812" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Updated: Dawned on me that loan mods are processed during work days. In November there were a total of 19 workdays (M-F, and excluding two Federal holidays). That works out to 35-36 loan mods per workday for November. --------- I have created a report whi</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Updated: Dawned on me that loan mods are processed during work days. In November there were a total of 19 workdays (M-F, and excluding two Federal holidays). That works out to 35-36 loan mods per workday for November. --------- I have created a report which now has a table showing monthly changes as well as monthly tables with state totals and state share of all loan mods. Three page PDF file is HERE, shows Oregon has a total of 8,241 mods through November, with 681 added during the month or about 22-23 a day. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/new-loan-mod-report-shows-681-loan-mods.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/8nDs8IvqZbc/112009mhastateloanmods.pdf" length="78812" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/112009mhastateloanmods.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-2969027802899782461</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-11T10:04:23.331-08:00</atom:updated><title>NLIHC Alert Says Housing Trust Fund to Be Part of Defense Appropriations, Includes Project Based Vouchers.</title><description>Copy of alert I received today&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Funding for the National Housing Trust Fund could be imminent. Senate and House offices needed to hear from you about the importance of ensuring capitalization of the NHTF at $1 billion and providing project-based voucher funding for most of the NHTF units.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Call your Senators and Representative now.  Ask them to support including this important NHTF funding in the FY10 Department of Defense appropriations bill.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;You can use this toll-free call-in number, &lt;b&gt;877-210-5351, &lt;/b&gt;for the congressional switchboard.  Or click on the blue Take Action link above to find the phone numbers for your senators and representative.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Status of NHTF Funding&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The House and Senate have until December 18 to enact the FY10 Department of Defense appropriations bill. This is a "must pass" bill. House and Senate housing leaders are in agreement to attach the NHTF funding proposal. But all Senate and House offices need to hear your support for including funding for the NHTF and the project-based vouchers in this bill in order to ensure it happens.&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;How Your Calls Can Help&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Senators and Representatives need to know that their constituents support NHTF funding in this last-chance legislative vehicle. To help make your case, NLIHC has estimates of how much your state will receive from an initial $1 billion capitalization and how many construction and permanent jobs will be created. These estimates are available at: &lt;a href="http://capwiz.com/nlihc/utr/1/KQUPLTBWNA/LYIELTBYOB/4385912971" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.nlihc.org/doc/NHTF-&lt;wbr&gt;State-Estimates.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;b&gt;This is It! Congress will adjourn for 2009 after it enacts the FY10 defense spending bill. There will not be another opportunity to enact NHTF funding until sometime later in 2010. &lt;/b&gt;&lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;If you can make one more round of calls to your Representative and Senators, we believe we can secure NHTF funding and move forward in 2010 to allocate these precious resources for the production and preservation of homes affordable to extremely low income households in early 2010.  &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt; &lt;div style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Thank you for your time and dedication.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-2969027802899782461?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=HJvev7EchPY:XG_dNN_YL64:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/HJvev7EchPY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/HJvev7EchPY/nlihc-alert-says-housing-trust-fund-to.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/nlihc-alert-says-housing-trust-fund-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-271642532452681973</guid><pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-14T09:07:38.756-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">metro</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cost burden</category><title>Updated: Metro Meeting Recap, New Sub Area Cost Burden Table.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Update: I added names of organizations that submitted written comments, Housing Land Advocates and REACH Community Development.&lt;br /&gt;---------&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Thursday Dec. 10&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; Metro Council meeting went pretty much as I anticipated,  with Council accepted the Urban Growth Report without any changes.Nonetheless, I thought that there were positives to take away from the meeting:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;ol  style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;There were a total of 7 people who testified on the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;UGR&lt;/span&gt;, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;ALL&lt;/span&gt; testimony included comments on the affordable housing needs section of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;UGR&lt;/span&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Two additional organizations filed written comments on the affordable housing needs component of the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;UGR&lt;/span&gt;. These organizations were Housing Land Advocates and REACH Community Development.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;For first time Council members heard directly from affordable housing community about the extent of the cost burden problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;Data problems in the &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;UGR&lt;/span&gt; are now part of the public record.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;The Council is on record as saying that "policies" would be determined next year, via changes to the Framework plan. (I encourage advocates to pay careful attention to proposed changes in the Framework and Functional plans, including deletions of existing requirements).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Testifying organizations included City of Portland Planning Bureau, Northwest Housing Alternatives, Coalition for a Livable Community, Oregon ON, the Community Housing Fund ( Washington County), and a developer/attorney, and me.  REACH Community Development and Northwest Land Advocates submitted written comments. I am VERY appreciative of ALL who took the time to appear or submit written comments.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Audio Video Resources&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Audio of the Council meeting should be available in a few days from &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonmetro.gov/index.cfm/go/by.web/id=21730/level=4"&gt;THIS&lt;/a&gt; website, look for the Dec 10&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;th&lt;/span&gt; session. Streaming video will also likely show up in a few days &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.tvctv.org/government-programming/government-meetings/metro"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;New Subarea Cost Burden Table&lt;br /&gt;One of defects that I found in the written report was absence of table showing renter cost burdens by sub area. I have now created such a table using Census Tract level data previously sent to me by Metro. (Table &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/metro200530subarearentburdenctdatasource.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;"&gt;replaces ALL other drafts I have done and is DRAFT until I confirm with Metro).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-271642532452681973?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=uJ71nROrbuc:8cJDCBWqwyg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/uJ71nROrbuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/uJ71nROrbuc/metro-meeting-recap-new-sub-area-cost.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/LPc9DNhCZe8/metro200530subarearentburdenctdatasource.pdf" fileSize="32869" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Update: I added names of organizations that submitted written comments, Housing Land Advocates and REACH Community Development. --------- The Thursday Dec. 10th Metro Council meeting went pretty much as I anticipated, with Council accepted the Urban Growt</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Update: I added names of organizations that submitted written comments, Housing Land Advocates and REACH Community Development. --------- The Thursday Dec. 10th Metro Council meeting went pretty much as I anticipated, with Council accepted the Urban Growth Report without any changes.Nonetheless, I thought that there were positives to take away from the meeting: There were a total of 7 people who testified on the UGR, ALL testimony included comments on the affordable housing needs section of the UGR. Two additional organizations filed written comments on the affordable housing needs component of the UGR. These organizations were Housing Land Advocates and REACH Community Development. For first time Council members heard directly from affordable housing community about the extent of the cost burden problem. Data problems in the UGR are now part of the public record. The Council is on record as saying that "policies" would be determined next year, via changes to the Framework plan. (I encourage advocates to pay careful attention to proposed changes in the Framework and Functional plans, including deletions of existing requirements). Testifying organizations included City of Portland Planning Bureau, Northwest Housing Alternatives, Coalition for a Livable Community, Oregon ON, the Community Housing Fund ( Washington County), and a developer/attorney, and me. REACH Community Development and Northwest Land Advocates submitted written comments. I am VERY appreciative of ALL who took the time to appear or submit written comments. Audio Video Resources Audio of the Council meeting should be available in a few days from THIS website, look for the Dec 10th session. Streaming video will also likely show up in a few days HERE. New Subarea Cost Burden Table One of defects that I found in the written report was absence of table showing renter cost burdens by sub area. I have now created such a table using Census Tract level data previously sent to me by Metro. (Table HERE replaces ALL other drafts I have done and is DRAFT until I confirm with Metro). </itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/metro-meeting-recap-new-sub-area-cost.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/LPc9DNhCZe8/metro200530subarearentburdenctdatasource.pdf" length="32869" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://www.housepdx.com/pdfs/housing/metro200530subarearentburdenctdatasource.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-7659857781682469993</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-10T11:04:42.813-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FY 2010 budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">house</category><title>Wow, That Was Quick: House Passes Omnibus FY 2010 Spending Bill.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;Was one hour of debate on Thursday AM. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;Doesn't look like single Republican voted for the bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bill will now move to Senate for action.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Bill web site is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.03288:"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-7659857781682469993?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=RZvnHt4Mwlo:n17QuCCdwEM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/RZvnHt4Mwlo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/RZvnHt4Mwlo/wow-that-was-quick-house-passes-omnibus.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/wow-that-was-quick-house-passes-omnibus.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-717910323725625339</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-10T09:09:58.316-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">congress</category><title>Congressional Directory.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;More than you ever wanted to know is in government publication &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cdirectory/index.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Oregon delegation profiles in PDF are &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_congressional_directory&amp;amp;docid=111th_txt-38.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also includes contact, names, and bios for Cabinet agency officials; HUD section (may be a little out of date as former Commissioner is shown) is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_congressional_directory&amp;amp;docid=111th_txt-96.pdf"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);"&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-717910323725625339?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=h2Z7OAWZCX8:NdOAz1TpIz0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/h2Z7OAWZCX8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/h2Z7OAWZCX8/congressional-directory.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/8vq_i9PF6xE/getdoc.cgi" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>More than you ever wanted to know is in government publication HERE. Oregon delegation profiles in PDF are HERE. Also includes contact, names, and bios for Cabinet agency officials; HUD section (may be a little out of date as former Commissioner is shown)</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>More than you ever wanted to know is in government publication HERE. Oregon delegation profiles in PDF are HERE. Also includes contact, names, and bios for Cabinet agency officials; HUD section (may be a little out of date as former Commissioner is shown) is HERE. Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/congressional-directory.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/8vq_i9PF6xE/getdoc.cgi" length="-1" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=111_congressional_directory&amp;amp;docid=111th_txt-38.pdf</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-5791398335024734192</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-09T14:55:05.940-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">HUD</category><title>HUD Gets New Chief Operating Officer; Former PA. Welfare Agency Head.</title><description>&lt;span style="font-family: trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;" &gt;I recall this being a new position being created, historically this would have been role for HUD's Deputy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Philadelphia Inquirer&lt;/span&gt; news story is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/78893542.html"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-5791398335024734192?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=aZ8i6HFVT0w:OL-SuPeQTAg:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/aZ8i6HFVT0w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/aZ8i6HFVT0w/hud-gets-new-chief-operating-officer.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/hud-gets-new-chief-operating-officer.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2539524345305613896.post-1626449131704237782</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-09T10:09:27.544-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FY 2010 budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">appropriations</category><title>Update:Breaking: FY 2010 HUD Appropriations Conference Report Language.</title><description>&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Update: I pulled out the Oregon HUD Congressional directed (AKA earmark ) funding from conference report. Three projects, $1.3 million:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Salem, Mill Creek employment center,                   pg 239, $500,000&lt;br /&gt;Coos Bay, dock equipment,                                   pg 254, $340,900&lt;br /&gt;Pendleton rodeo facilities,                                   pg 254, $487,000&lt;br /&gt;Total                                                                            &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;  $1,327,900 &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;---------------------------&lt;br /&gt;On a VERY preliminary basis it appears that there MAY be agreement on a conference committee versions of the HUD -Transportation appropriations bill that is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Appears that Conference Report and Bill may be introduced in House at noon today; full House and Senate consideration will be required before Bill can be signed into law.  I would expect usual delays because of amendments and Senate logjam.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Document &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://docs.house.gov/rules/omni2010/hr3288cr_diva_jes.pdf#page=89"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt; should open to the HUD Section of the bill conference committee explanation.(Summary table of HUD amounts runs from PDF pages 283-296).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Actual legislative language is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://docs.house.gov/rules/omni2010/hr3288cr_diva_txt.pdf#page=114"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;, HUD Section starts at page 114, ends at page 212.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(Both conference report and bill links above include handwritten comments, mark outs etc. Eventually cleaner versions of both will appear at &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;Thomas website for bill (H.R. 3288); link is &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:H.R.03288:"&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style=";font-family:trebuchet ms;font-size:100%;"  &gt;&lt;br /&gt;Originally created and posted on the &lt;a style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);" href="http://www.oregonhousing.blogspot.com/"&gt;Oregon Housing Blog&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2539524345305613896-1626449131704237782?l=oregonhousing.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?a=JQ305uj1kmU:79sFYAClYRw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/OregonHousingBlog?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~4/JQ305uj1kmU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~3/JQ305uj1kmU/breaking-fy-2010-hud-appropriations.html</link><author>housepdx@gmail.com (Tom Cusack)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><media:content url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pfC1n98HnXI/hr3288cr_diva_jes.pdf" fileSize="8631273" type="application/pdf" /><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:subtitle>Update: I pulled out the Oregon HUD Congressional directed (AKA earmark ) funding from conference report. Three projects, $1.3 million: Salem, Mill Creek employment center, pg 239, $500,000 Coos Bay, dock equipment, pg 254, $340,900 Pendleton rodeo facili</itunes:subtitle><itunes:author>Tom Cusack</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Update: I pulled out the Oregon HUD Congressional directed (AKA earmark ) funding from conference report. Three projects, $1.3 million: Salem, Mill Creek employment center, pg 239, $500,000 Coos Bay, dock equipment, pg 254, $340,900 Pendleton rodeo facilities, pg 254, $487,000 Total $1,327,900 --------------------------- On a VERY preliminary basis it appears that there MAY be agreement on a conference committee versions of the HUD -Transportation appropriations bill that is part of a larger omnibus appropriations bill. Appears that Conference Report and Bill may be introduced in House at noon today; full House and Senate consideration will be required before Bill can be signed into law. I would expect usual delays because of amendments and Senate logjam. Document HERE should open to the HUD Section of the bill conference committee explanation.(Summary table of HUD amounts runs from PDF pages 283-296). Actual legislative language is HERE, HUD Section starts at page 114, ends at page 212. (Both conference report and bill links above include handwritten comments, mark outs etc. Eventually cleaner versions of both will appear at Thomas website for bill (H.R. 3288); link is HERE). Originally created and posted on the Oregon Housing Blog.</itunes:summary><itunes:keywords>Oregon,Oregon,legislature,single,family,minority,homeownership,multifamily,housing,subsidized,housing,Section,8,public,housing,preservation,LIHTC,tax,credits,Oregon,budget,Oregon,tax,policy,individual,development,accounts,IDA,homeless,comm</itunes:keywords><feedburner:origLink>http://oregonhousing.blogspot.com/2009/12/breaking-fy-2010-hud-appropriations.html</feedburner:origLink><enclosure url="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OregonHousingBlog/~5/pfC1n98HnXI/hr3288cr_diva_jes.pdf" length="8631273" type="application/pdf" /><feedburner:origEnclosureLink>http://docs.house.gov/rules/omni2010/hr3288cr_diva_jes.pdf#page=89</feedburner:origEnclosureLink></item><language>en-us</language><media:credit role="author">Tom Cusack</media:credit><media:rating>nonadult</media:rating><media:description type="plain">Oregon Housing Blog</media:description></channel></rss>
