<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;A0EEQX85fip7ImA9WxBaEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250</id><updated>2010-03-19T10:40:00.126-04:00</updated><title>PR Back Talk</title><subtitle type="html">Insights and attitude about PR, journalism and traditional and social media.</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>508</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PrBackTalk" /><feedburner:info uri="prbacktalk" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0EEQX84fSp7ImA9WxBaEE0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-7563192353252262606</id><published>2010-03-19T10:40:00.003-04:00</published><updated>2010-03-19T10:40:00.135-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-19T10:40:00.135-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oracle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Microsoft" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="MarketWatch" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wall Street Journal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="H-P" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media stories" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EMC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="validated" /><title>MarketWatch Validates Our Prediction on Top Media Stories in 2010</title><content type="html">Another validation of our prediction of the top media stories that "reporters are sure to be working on this year.

First was the Wall St. Journal, which validated (as reported here yesterday) our pick that the media would cover competition between Google vs. Apple vs. Microsoft and EMC vs. H-P vs. Oracle

Now MarketWatch (also owned by the WSJ), which wrote, "H-P, Cisco face-off highlights rival CEOs' contrasting styles; New rivalry pits an operations maestro against a charismatic...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/J3j2hkay_zc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/7563192353252262606/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=7563192353252262606" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/7563192353252262606?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/7563192353252262606?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/J3j2hkay_zc/marketwatch-validates-our-prediction-on.html" title="MarketWatch Validates Our Prediction on Top Media Stories in 2010" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/marketwatch-validates-our-prediction-on.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0UGQX08eyp7ImA9WxBbGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-3369291297182895525</id><published>2010-03-18T10:07:00.005-04:00</published><updated>2010-03-18T10:07:00.373-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-18T10:07:00.373-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wall Street Journal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="media stories" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="H-P" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oracle" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Google" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="EMC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Apple" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Microsoft" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="validated" /><title>WSJ Validates Our Prediction on Top Media Stories in 2010</title><content type="html">Earlier this year. we issued a dozen predictions, and have seen a number of them quickly validated.

One of the predictions listed what we think will be top media stories that "reporters are sure to be working on this year (though not necessarily in the order)" we presented them.

We picked Google vs. Apple vs. Microsoft and EMC vs. H-P vs. Oracle -- shorthand for intense competition across a range of traditional and new battleground technologies.  For example, Google Android and Nexus One vs....&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/_pfbhyJrDxI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/3369291297182895525/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=3369291297182895525" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3369291297182895525?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3369291297182895525?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/_pfbhyJrDxI/wsj-validates-our-prediction-on-top.html" title="WSJ Validates Our Prediction on Top Media Stories in 2010" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/wsj-validates-our-prediction-on-top.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QEQX8_fCp7ImA9WxBbGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-7068405202322579085</id><published>2010-03-17T10:15:00.006-04:00</published><updated>2010-03-17T10:15:00.144-04:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-17T10:15:00.144-04:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ROI" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="B2B" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dunkin' Donuts" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="metrics" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="meaurement" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="B2C" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Twitter" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ZipCar" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Staples" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Forrester Research" /><title>Does Social Media Really Pay Off for Big Companies?</title><content type="html">As part of the new normal, we're seeing increased need for ROI. That's a challenge with social media because the right metrics may well be different for each company.

In "Turning tweets into sales: Twitter’s allure is tough to translate into dollars, though Dunkin’ Donuts is tracking results," The Boston Business Journal wrote an interesting story that provided some details about how Dunkin' Donuts,  Staples and other companies approach social media.

Here are some interesting facts:
35...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/qyZqJR6BqLQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/7068405202322579085/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=7068405202322579085" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/7068405202322579085?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/7068405202322579085?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/qyZqJR6BqLQ/does-social-media-really-pay-off-for.html" title="Does Social Media Really Pay Off for Big Companies?" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/does-social-media-really-pay-off-for.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0EGSXY7fip7ImA9WxBbEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-1545141032107758889</id><published>2010-03-09T10:53:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-09T11:20:28.806-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-09T11:20:28.806-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DailyDeal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online subscription" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Rupert Murdoch" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="TheDeal" /><title>TheDeal Validates Our Prediction About Online Subscriptions</title><content type="html">Last month, we issued our annual list of predictions, and posted more details on Feb. 2, Prediction #3: 2010 will be the year of online subscriptions.  The New York Times has already validated our prediction in an article last month. Now, TheDeal has validated the prediction, too.

In an article, "Creeping Towards Ubiquity: the Pay-for-Play Traditional Media is Striking Back, Winning Some Small Victories Over Digital Free-Content Rivals," Richard Morgan, who covers the media for TheDeal,...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/bZNITUzARxw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/1545141032107758889/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=1545141032107758889" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/1545141032107758889?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/1545141032107758889?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/bZNITUzARxw/thedeal-validates-our-prediction-about.html" title="TheDeal Validates Our Prediction About Online Subscriptions" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/thedeal-validates-our-prediction-about.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0ACQXw6cSp7ImA9WxBUF0Q.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-3441771185760762953</id><published>2010-03-05T09:36:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-05T09:36:00.219-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-05T09:36:00.219-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York Times" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hyperlocal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wall St. Journal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="local coverage" /><title>Wall St. Journal to Launch NY-Metro Edtion</title><content type="html">The Wall St. Journal has announced another front in its battle against the New York Times: a local section for New York, to be launched in April.  The new section has been an open secret for months now, but the WSJ announced it officially this week, here.

The new section will appear six days a week, include 16 pages of content and ads, and cover state and local politics, business, culture, sports and real estate.  About 35 reporters and editors will be assigned the new section, which will be...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/tTDDCLAOBD4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/3441771185760762953/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=3441771185760762953" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3441771185760762953?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3441771185760762953?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/tTDDCLAOBD4/wall-st-journal-to-launch-ny-metro.html" title="Wall St. Journal to Launch NY-Metro Edtion" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/wall-st-journal-to-launch-ny-metro.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0YMRnw6eyp7ImA9WxBUF0w.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-6055059748803619976</id><published>2010-03-03T20:21:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-04T10:06:27.213-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-04T10:06:27.213-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="year of online subscriptions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hulu.com" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Viacom" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="The Daily Show" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Colbert Report" /><title>Another Prediction Appears to be Correct: Viacom Drops Daily Show &amp; Colbert Report...</title><content type="html">We predicted that 2010 would be the year of online subscriptions, and today's news from the Wall St. Journal report, "Hulu Loses Stewart, Colbert," appears to support that.

According to the Journal, the reason Viacom, which owns Comedy Central, which produces The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, is pulling those programs from Hulu.com is that it was not seeing enough revenue from Hulu.com.

Hulu.com, which is advertising supported, shares a percentage of the advertising dollars with content...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/nx7Zd5OL948" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/6055059748803619976/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=6055059748803619976" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6055059748803619976?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6055059748803619976?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/nx7Zd5OL948/another-prediction-appears-to-be-corrct.html" title="Another Prediction Appears to be Correct: Viacom Drops Daily Show &amp; Colbert Report..." /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/03/another-prediction-appears-to-be-corrct.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0IMQ30zeyp7ImA9WxBUEUQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-2256507294628900268</id><published>2010-02-26T09:40:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-26T09:46:22.383-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-26T09:46:22.383-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Network TV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="network news" /><title>Is ABC Killing the Brand Known as "Network News"? -- Part Two</title><content type="html">The cuts at the network news divisions is going to have an impact on the brand, as I mentioned in yesterday's article.  What I didn't mention then is the impact digital journalism may have on PR functions.

With fewer resources, journalists will need to rely more on PR functions (departments, agencies) to get information, B-roll, etc.

There will be two challenges
Reaching these already too-busy reporters.Getting them to trust that the content you're providing is of a high quality and...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/8YeyV4Xf0Sc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/2256507294628900268/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=2256507294628900268" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2256507294628900268?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2256507294628900268?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/8YeyV4Xf0Sc/is-abc-killing-brand-known-as-network_26.html" title="Is ABC Killing the Brand Known as &quot;Network News&quot;? -- Part Two" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/is-abc-killing-brand-known-as-network_26.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Dk8EQX85fSp7ImA9WxBUEUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-3056179305821093205</id><published>2010-02-25T11:20:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-25T11:20:00.125-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-25T11:20:00.125-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Dilbert" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PowerPoint" /><title>Dilbert's take on PowerPoint</title><content type="html">It's like those people who say, "The plan is self-explanatory, but I'd like to walk you through it anyway."


&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/Fq9D95gUJiI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/3056179305821093205/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=3056179305821093205" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3056179305821093205?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3056179305821093205?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/Fq9D95gUJiI/dilberts-take-on-powerpoint.html" title="Dilbert's take on PowerPoint" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/dilberts-take-on-powerpoint.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAGQX08fSp7ImA9WxBUEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-3827195007773519214</id><published>2010-02-25T09:22:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-25T09:22:00.375-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-25T09:22:00.375-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Network TV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ABC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="network news" /><title>Is ABC Killing the Brand Known as "Network News"?</title><content type="html">According to the New York Times, "ABC News to Cut Hundreds of Staff Members," ABC will cut about 25% of its news staff or roughly 300 to 400 jobs.

The Times' Brian Stetler reported, "The cuts at ABC, a unit of the Walt Disney Company, are among the steepest ever conducted by a network news division, and are likely to be seen as a further erosion of the company’s news-gathering arm."

That's part of why I think ABC is killing the brand experience of Network News.  I've seen Network News teams...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/g5ScKg9cqDY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/3827195007773519214/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=3827195007773519214" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3827195007773519214?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/3827195007773519214?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/g5ScKg9cqDY/is-abc-killing-brand-known-as-network.html" title="Is ABC Killing the Brand Known as &quot;Network News&quot;?" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/is-abc-killing-brand-known-as-network.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cBRH09fCp7ImA9WxBUEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-4064587251270379610</id><published>2010-02-24T09:07:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T09:17:35.364-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T09:17:35.364-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pseudonym" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bloggers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="transparency" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="accountability" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FTC" /><title>Is the Use of a Pseudonym Reason to Fire a Blogger?</title><content type="html">The Wall St. Journal's Nick Wingfield wrote about Randall Kennedy, an InfoWorld blogger who used a pseudonym when interviewing sources for his blog.  It's an interesting article, "The Second Life of a Tech Blogger."

Famous writers throughout history have used pseudonyms, including Benjamin Franklin, Walt Whitman and Samuel L. Clemens, to name a few.  There's a grand tradition.  Stephen King has published books using a pseudonym.

Of course, some of those named above are known for their...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/Oee_ALGOwe8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/4064587251270379610/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=4064587251270379610" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4064587251270379610?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4064587251270379610?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/Oee_ALGOwe8/is-use-of-pseudonym-reason-to-fire.html" title="Is the Use of a Pseudonym Reason to Fire a Blogger?" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/is-use-of-pseudonym-reason-to-fire.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQDRXw7eip7ImA9WxBUEE8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-6067976499931719329</id><published>2010-02-22T07:11:00.008-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-24T09:06:14.202-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-24T09:06:14.202-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Jeff Jarvis" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Facebook" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="customer service" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Comcast" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="BuzzMachine" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Twitter" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Yellowbook" /><title>Customer Service in the Social Media Age</title><content type="html">Traditionally, many companies looked at customer service as a cost center, a necessary expense that had a negative impact on margins.  They saw it as an obligation, and tended to underfund the fuction. Key metrics for customer service included: how quickly customer service representatives could resolve an issue (i.e., get a customer off the phone), and how inexpensively could the company train and pay its reps.

Those sort of metrics aren't designed to deliver customer service. They're designed...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/YHVuCK2sOWE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/6067976499931719329/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=6067976499931719329" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6067976499931719329?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6067976499931719329?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/YHVuCK2sOWE/customer-service-in-social-media-age.html" title="Customer Service in the Social Media Age" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/customer-service-in-social-media-age.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkMBRHsyfCp7ImA9WxBVFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-2047779706893467988</id><published>2010-02-18T13:20:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-18T13:40:55.594-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-18T13:40:55.594-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="layoffs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online newsrooms" /><title>Online CT Newsroom Shuts Down</title><content type="html">Last year, we predicted that Online Sites Will Not be Immune to Advertising Slowdown. We saw some bumps over the past year.  And today's New York Times had an interesting article about the role of local nonprofit political and news sites.  Check out: It Won’t Line a Bird Cage, but It’s Still News.


&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/zJz7DzKIUiU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/2047779706893467988/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=2047779706893467988" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2047779706893467988?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2047779706893467988?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/zJz7DzKIUiU/online-ct-newsroom-shuts-down.html" title="Online CT Newsroom Shuts Down" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/online-ct-newsroom-shuts-down.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cCQ3s9fip7ImA9WxBVFUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-8268250825961636610</id><published>2010-02-18T11:33:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-18T11:37:42.566-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-18T11:37:42.566-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="New York Times" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="newssites" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hyperlocal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="AP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Wal St. Journal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Rupoert Murdoch" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Boston Globe" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Kindle" /><title>Our Track Record on 2009 Predictions</title><content type="html">A lot of organizations issue predictions without looking back to see what they got right and what they, um, didn't.  We decided to take a look at the predictions we issued in Jan. 2009, Top 14+ Media Trends for 2009.
We did pretty well with those predictions: We were right in saying we need a new term for newspaper once they            stop printing on paper. However, our designated term "newssites"            has not taken off.We were (sadly) correct that a lot of print newspapers and...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/9AU0X6IPb94" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/8268250825961636610/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=8268250825961636610" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/8268250825961636610?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/8268250825961636610?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/9AU0X6IPb94/our-track-record-on-2009-predictions.html" title="Our Track Record on 2009 Predictions" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/our-track-record-on-2009-predictions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEMERnc8fyp7ImA9WxBWGE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-5335411293872022128</id><published>2010-02-10T16:11:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T16:13:27.977-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-10T16:13:27.977-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="David Letterman" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Jay Leno" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBS" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NBC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Oprah" /><title>What's the impact of the Leno-Letterman commercial</title><content type="html">It was a great move by Letterman/CBS &amp;amp; Leno/NBC to run the commercial during the Super Bowl.

The ad was the funniest aired during the Super Bowl, and was one of the funniest things Leno has down in sometime. Inside baseball, sure -- my kids didn't get it -- but they're not the target audience for late night TV, yet. It showed they both could laugh at themselves, and it generated buzz, not a bad thing for either show. It won't stop the audience erosion that all network TV is experiencing,...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/MBNHASaE2XA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/5335411293872022128/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=5335411293872022128" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/5335411293872022128?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/5335411293872022128?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/MBNHASaE2XA/whats-impact-of-leno-letterman.html" title="What's the impact of the Leno-Letterman commercial" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/whats-impact-of-leno-letterman.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUAHRX4zfip7ImA9WxBWGEw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-5457522080583700848</id><published>2010-02-10T10:58:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-10T11:02:14.086-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-10T11:02:14.086-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="WSJ" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPhone" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPad" /><title>WSJ parody: Interview with an Person Experiencing iPhone/iPad Withdrawal</title><content type="html">Actually pretty funny.




&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/pMBtwje2b1k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/5457522080583700848/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=5457522080583700848" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/5457522080583700848?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/5457522080583700848?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/pMBtwje2b1k/wsj-parody-interview-with-person.html" title="WSJ parody: Interview with an Person Experiencing iPhone/iPad Withdrawal" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/wsj-parody-interview-with-person.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYFSHk7eCp7ImA9WxBWFkg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-8459986022194429736</id><published>2010-02-08T11:33:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T14:41:59.700-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-08T14:41:59.700-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online only" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="3-D TV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="print journalism" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Walt Mossberg" /><title>2010 Predictions, 1 through 12</title><content type="html">Each year, Birnbach Communications compiles an annual list of media trends for our clients, helping them to work more effectively with the media, both at traditional and online outlets, including blogs and social networking sites. Here's a list of some of our top trends in one place, to make it easier to review them all; let us know if you agree or disagree with what we've said.
Traditional print journalism will continue to be important.  Even as the resources allocated to practicing it...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/05h069SwenI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/8459986022194429736/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=8459986022194429736" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/8459986022194429736?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/8459986022194429736?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/05h069SwenI/2010-predictions-1-through-12.html" title="2010 Predictions, 1 through 12" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/2010-predictions-1-through-12.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYEQXY5eCp7ImA9WxBWFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-2557794297210107495</id><published>2010-02-08T10:15:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T10:15:00.820-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-08T10:15:00.820-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="bloggers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="reviewers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online credibility" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Walt Mossberg" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="FTC" /><title>Prediction #12: Online Credibility Will Continue To Be Important,</title><content type="html">Online credibility will continue to be important, but new FTC rules requiring bloggers to disclose the receipt of free samples, gifts and cash payments will get confusing because many who don't blog are not required to make similar disclosures.  Currently, tech reviewers at newspapers get free samples but don't need to disclose that fact (though Walt Mossberg and others do…on their websites and blogs). Theater reviewers often get free tickets while many freelance travel writers get all their...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/4QVhn1xGp8A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/2557794297210107495/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=2557794297210107495" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2557794297210107495?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2557794297210107495?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/4QVhn1xGp8A/prediction-12-online-credibility-will.html" title="Prediction #12: Online Credibility Will Continue To Be Important," /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-12-online-credibility-will.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkAGQX07eCp7ImA9WxBWFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-4172282653425455220</id><published>2010-02-08T08:12:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-08T08:12:00.300-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-08T08:12:00.300-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="interactive" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Super Bowl" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Olympics" /><title>Prediction #11: The Intersection of Social Media and Traditional Journalism Will Be Increasingly Busy</title><content type="html">For example, while the Super Bowl continues to be the biggest non-holiday event for which Americans gather together, and while people comment on the ads as much as the games, advertisers themselves are looking beyond the ads, often offering websites with extended versions of some ads, driving viewers to their sites. Another example: Olympic sponsors are changing their approach this year -- rather than having social media simply an add-on to advertising and their PR activities- they are...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/bUqq7G7HW5M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/4172282653425455220/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=4172282653425455220" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4172282653425455220?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4172282653425455220?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/bUqq7G7HW5M/prediction-11-intersection-of-social.html" title="Prediction #11: The Intersection of Social Media and Traditional Journalism Will Be Increasingly Busy" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-11-intersection-of-social.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEECQX48fyp7ImA9WxBWE0U.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-6974137343159522073</id><published>2010-02-05T10:11:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-05T10:11:00.077-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-05T10:11:00.077-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Facebook" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="videostream" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill Cosby" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Cosnarati" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Twitter" /><title>Prediction #10: Live Integrated Real-time Interactive Multimedia Web Events Will Become More Common in 2010</title><content type="html">Live integrated real-time interactive multimedia web events, which combine live video, and offering the ability to post and read comments on Twitter and Facebook windows, will become more common in 2010.  Last year, Bill Cosby conducted the first-ever interactive townhall to introduce Cosnarati, a socially conscious hip hop group that he produces (http://www.ustream.tv/billcosby), offering a live videostream with a real-time Q&amp;amp;A function and the ability to post comments on Twitter and...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/hLSrXjmqGwg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/6974137343159522073/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=6974137343159522073" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6974137343159522073?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6974137343159522073?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/hLSrXjmqGwg/prediction-10-live-integrated-real-time.html" title="Prediction #10: Live Integrated Real-time Interactive Multimedia Web Events Will Become More Common in 2010" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-10-live-integrated-real-time.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0UMQX07eCp7ImA9WxBWE0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-4695994854952548309</id><published>2010-02-05T08:08:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-05T08:08:00.300-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-05T08:08:00.300-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Facebook" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Social Networking Fatigue" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Twitter" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="social media marketing" /><title>Prediction #9: Social Media Platforms will Survive the Recovery.</title><content type="html">Some critics have said that Twitter and Facebook did well during the downturn because people had available time, either because they had less to do or because they had lost their jobs. People  will continue to use Twitter, Facebook and other social media services but they might not be updating their pages quite as often.  Social media sites will consider rolling out new ways for users to post and engage via multimedia (audio and video).


&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/Jx1I8LHrdVI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/4695994854952548309/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=4695994854952548309" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4695994854952548309?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/4695994854952548309?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/Jx1I8LHrdVI/prediction-9-social-media-platforms.html" title="Prediction #9: Social Media Platforms will Survive the Recovery." /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-9-social-media-platforms.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D04EQXk5eCp7ImA9WxBWEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-6916005041470222168</id><published>2010-02-04T10:05:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-04T10:05:00.720-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-04T10:05:00.720-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Network TV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="TiVo" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Hulu.com" /><title>Prediction #8: The Decline and Fall of TV Networks...Won't Happen in 2010...</title><content type="html">But networks are definitely on the decline. Case in point: "The Jay Leno Show" vs. "The Tonight Show with Conan O'Brien." In the end, NBC has been shedding viewers, and no change of hosts or programs may bring them back.  It's not as though those viewers were sticking around for drama at 10 p.m. on other networks. Most likely they were turning to cable programs or on-demand offerings, TiVo, Hulu.com or the Internet.


&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/z0zs-E0Q2JE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/6916005041470222168/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=6916005041470222168" title="4 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6916005041470222168?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/6916005041470222168?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/z0zs-E0Q2JE/prediction-8-decline-and-fall-of-tv.html" title="Prediction #8: The Decline and Fall of TV Networks...Won't Happen in 2010..." /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-8-decline-and-fall-of-tv.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0EMQXczfSp7ImA9WxBWEkQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-1596502014279124019</id><published>2010-02-04T09:12:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-04T11:08:00.985-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-04T11:08:00.985-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="3D TVs" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="3-D TV" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Forbes" /><title>Forbes &amp; Times Validate Prediction #5 by Writing about 3-D TV</title><content type="html">Another day, another validation of our predictions.  This time: Forbes, in an article, What's Better Than 3-D TV? 3-D TV And Beer! And the New York Times: The Pluses, and Oddities, of 3-D TV.

Last month, we issued a set of predictions that included top business story angles (available here). And very quickly, we're seeing those predictions validated by new reports and articles.

In its article, which appeared yesterday, Forbes took the approach that most others will take: That network TV is...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/QMPsSjGHs4E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/1596502014279124019/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=1596502014279124019" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/1596502014279124019?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/1596502014279124019?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/QMPsSjGHs4E/forbes-validates-prediction-5-by.html" title="Forbes &amp; Times Validate Prediction #5 by Writing about 3-D TV" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/forbes-validates-prediction-5-by.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkIGQX04eyp7ImA9WxBWEkU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-416790180866503964</id><published>2010-02-04T08:02:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-04T08:02:00.333-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-04T08:02:00.333-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="video" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPods" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="texting" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="&quot;Video Killed the Radio Star&quot;" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Radio" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="iPads" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CDs" /><title>Prediction #7: Video May Have Killed the Radio Star but Radio Will Continue to Survive -- For Now</title><content type="html">But in two years, we may not be making the same prediction.  Today's kids do not listen to radio as much as previous generations did.  They listen to iPods and soon, iPads.

We believe that radio continues to be important, especially during drive-time commutes. We think record companies should continue to support radio stations because people still listen to radio to discover new songs and then decide to download songs (or buy CDs, if they're boomers) based on what they hear on the radio.

But...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/doaCKzXyLkg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/416790180866503964/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=416790180866503964" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/416790180866503964?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/416790180866503964?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/doaCKzXyLkg/prediction-7-video-may-have-killed.html" title="Prediction #7: Video May Have Killed the Radio Star but Radio Will Continue to Survive -- For Now" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-7-video-may-have-killed.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkADQXY-fCp7ImA9WxBbEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-155514535118010220</id><published>2010-02-03T11:43:00.005-05:00</published><updated>2010-03-09T11:06:10.854-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-03-09T11:06:10.854-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="online subscription" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Richard Perez-Pena" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="predictions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="trends" /><title>NYTimes Quickly Validates Our Prediction about Online Subscriptions</title><content type="html">Last month, we issued our annual list of predictions, and posted more details on Feb. 2, Prediction #3: 2010 will be the year of online subscriptions. In today's New York Times, blog favorite Richard Perez-Pena wrote, "Some News Outlets Ready to Try Charging Online Readers."

It's nice to be validated -- so quickly.


&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/EOE6iUsmAkE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/155514535118010220/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=155514535118010220" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/155514535118010220?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/155514535118010220?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/EOE6iUsmAkE/nytimes-already-validates-our.html" title="NYTimes Quickly Validates Our Prediction about Online Subscriptions" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/nytimes-already-validates-our.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEAAQXs4cCp7ImA9WxBWEkw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2878145139485098250.post-2365512396282053077</id><published>2010-02-03T10:59:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2010-02-03T10:59:00.538-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-03T10:59:00.538-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="business videoconference" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Lufthansa" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="in-flight Internet access" /><title>Prediction #6: In-flight Internet Access Will Take Off</title><content type="html">We will see more in-flight Internet access in 2010 – by 2011; it won’t even be something airlines tout as another reason to fly with them.  Lufthansa rolled out new service: web surfing from 30,000 ft at $3/min. (What does it cost for tech support?) We can expect more conference calls and emails, and flying cross country no longer means being unable to respond to email. But battery life, additional sockets, and headphones will be boom businesses. The rise of business videoconference calls may...&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;br/&gt;
[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~4/O6LIrEp5-k4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.birnbachcom.com/feeds/2365512396282053077/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2878145139485098250&amp;postID=2365512396282053077" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2365512396282053077?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2878145139485098250/posts/default/2365512396282053077?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PrBackTalk/~3/O6LIrEp5-k4/prediction-6-in-flight-internet-access.html" title="Prediction #6: In-flight Internet Access Will Take Off" /><author><name>Norman</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/05964900498679420101</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="17237777735849063691" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://blog.birnbachcom.com/2010/02/prediction-6-in-flight-internet-access.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
