<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>Euro Pacific Capital – Peter Schiff's Economic Commentary</title><link>http://www.europac.net/archives.asp</link><description>Peter Schiff’s weekly commentary is delivered every Friday. Peter addresses major development affecting the economic health of America, and key markets abroad, with the same honest insight that allowed him to call the economic crisis years before “mainstream” economists.</description><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item><title>The Truth Behind China's Currency Peg</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/D4OfQi-i_Vw/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>During President Obama's high profile visit to China this week, the most frequently discussed, yet least understood, topic was how currency valuations are affecting the economic relationship between the United States and China. The focal problem is the Chinese government's policy of fixing the value of the renminbi against the U.S. dollar. While many correctly perceive that this 'peg' has contributed greatly to the current global imbalances, few fully comprehend the ramifications should that peg be discarded.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/D4OfQi-i_Vw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, November 20, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17695</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Job Losses Demystified</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/Cx__sAyA4RY/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>As the unemployment rate crossed the double digit barrier for the first time since Michael Jackson learned to moonwalk, President Obama announced that he will convene a “jobs summit” to finally bring the problem under control. Using all the analytic skill that his administration can muster, the President is determined to figure out why so many people are losing their jobs and then formulate a solution. That's a relief; for a while there, I thought we were in real trouble! In fact, the absolute last thing our economy needs is more federal government interference. If Obama really wants to know what's behind entrenched joblessness, he should start by looking at the man in the mirror.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/Cx__sAyA4RY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, November 13, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17648</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Lousy Jobs, In Such Small Portions</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/SgEL8_2JxhU/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>Two dissatisfied customers comment about a restaurant.  One says, "The food here is terrible."  The other replies, "I know, and such small portions!"  In many ways, they could be describing our current employment picture.  Not only are the portions shrinking, but the jobs themselves are steadily losing quality.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/SgEL8_2JxhU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, November 06, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17598</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Hair of the Dog</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/lrnxXYm4upg/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>The GDP numbers out yesterday, which showed economic growth at 3.5% in the third quarter, brought a deafening chorus from public and private economists who all agreed that the recession is officially over. With such a strong report, they are happy to tell us that not only has the Fat Lady finished her aria, but she has left the building and is sipping champagne in the bath. As usual, it falls on me to rain on the parade.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/lrnxXYm4upg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, October 30, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17544</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>King Dollar Forced to Abdicate</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/pv1fc27LkRI/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>For the most part, the value of the dollar is given cursory attention by the financial media.  Typically, its movements are assigned an importance on par with much less determinative metrics such as natural gas futures and construction permits.  It's only when major milestones are reached that anyone really takes notice of the dollar.  We are living through one of those times.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/pv1fc27LkRI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, October 23, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17494</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Ignorance Is Bliss</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/Gy6hxy7ltSY/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>While all the talk at present is about economic corners turned and markets charging ahead, no one is paying much notice to an American economy deteriorating before our eyes. These myopic commentators seem to be simply moving past the now almost-universally held conclusion that before the crash of 2008, our economy was on an unsustainable course. If these imbalances had been corrected, then perhaps I too would be joining in the euphoria.  But evidence abounds that we have not veered at all from that dangerous path.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/Gy6hxy7ltSY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, October 16, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17446</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Recovery That Isn’t</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/4H8WCCCTVv4/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>For those market boosters who are prattling on about the possibility of a “jobless recovery,” I offer an invitation to join me for a breakfast of “fat-free bacon,” “eggless omelets,” and “no-carb bread.” As unappetizing as such a meal may sound, it would nevertheless offer more substance than the oxymoronic concept of an economic resurgence without job creation.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/4H8WCCCTVv4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, October 02, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17345</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>The Price of Pretense in Pittsburgh</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/ihDCmDk8C6Y/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>As another G20 meeting rolls around, this time on home soil, the time comes once again for the economically curious but politically unconnected to wonder what is really happening behind closed doors. But while admiring the pageantry, chuckling at the awkward group photos, and parsing the joint communiqués like newly found Dead Sea scrolls, the overwhelming majority of observers will miss the meeting’s dominant theme: hypocrisy.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/ihDCmDk8C6Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, September 25, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17297</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Lehman Brothers Revisited</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/YBNHDYgcC0A/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>As we pass the one year anniversary of the fall of Lehman Brothers, journalists,
politicians and market analysts have seized on the occasion to offer seemingly sober
assessments of what went wrong and what went right in the lead up and aftermath
of the biggest financial event since Black Tuesday.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/YBNHDYgcC0A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, September 18, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17249</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Canary in the Coal Mine</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~3/4xvVT8Ehp3E/pschiff-article.asp</link><description>Like a battering ram in a medieval siege, gold keeps hammering away at the gate. For the third time in less than twelve months, the yellow metal is once again crashing into the $1,000 per ounce level.  As of press time, it looks like gold will close above that level today and will set a new record in the process.  Even if the breach is fleeting, who can doubt that it will mount another assault soon?  In the meantime, there is no shortage of market analysts who are not buying gold while questioning the motives of those who are.  Although they offer a variety of strained reasons, they nearly all agree that it has nothing to do with inflation, which is nearly universally considered dead and buried.  As a self-confessed gold bug, I can assure all that inflation is the only reason I buy gold. And recently, I'm buying a lot.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/PeterSchiffsEconomicCommentary/~4/4xvVT8Ehp3E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><pubDate>Friday, September 11, 2009</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://www.europac.net/pschiff-article.asp?id=17199</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
